To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Facies (Geology) – Texas – Gulf Region.
Journal articles on the topic 'Facies (Geology) – Texas – Gulf Region'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 18 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Facies (Geology) – Texas – Gulf Region.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
Mickus, Kevin L. "Magnetotelluric observations in the western Ouachita Mountains, southeastern Oklahoma." GEOPHYSICS 64, no. 6 (1999): 1680–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.1444672.
Full textAbstract:
The first magnetotelluric (MT) analysis of the Ouachita Mountains region is presented. Magnetotelluric data acquired at 19 sites along a 60-km profile in southeastern Oklahoma were used to image the western extension of the Ouachita Mountains and to determine the poorly known subsurface interaction between the Pennsylvanian Tishomingo‐Belton uplift and the subsurface extension of the exposed western Ouachita Mountains. Drill‐hole data, geologic mapping, seismic reflection profiles, and 1-D and 2-D MT-derived models indicate that lying beneath the low‐resistivity Gulf Coastal Plain sediments are 2–3 km of deep‐water lower Pennsylvanian (Jackfork Group) sediments and 6–8 km of Ouachita facies lithologies, mainly consisting of the Stanley Group. Beneath the profile’s northern section are 2–4 km of Atoka Formation sediments, probably deposited within the Arkoma basin, that underlie thrusted zones of the Stanley Group. The most unique feature is a high‐resistivity zone beneath stations 7–9, interpreted to be Precambrian/Cambrian granite similar to that exposed in the Tishomingo‐Belton uplift. A deep (5–6 km) low‐resistivity zone that may represent the northern border of the subsurface extension of the Broken Bow uplift is located along the Texas/Oklahoma border; however, this zone is not required by the MT data.
2
Lin, Yani, Tianze Zhang, and Kelly H. Liu. "Turbidite lobe deposits in a canyon-fill system." Interpretation 9, no. 2 (2021): C17—C21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/int-2020-0111.1.
Full textAbstract:
Geological feature: Turbidite lobe deposits in a canyon-fill system Seismic appearance: Isolated and irregularly shaped sandstone pods Alternative interpretations: Mid-channel bars in a braided channel system Features with similar appearance: Alluvial fans Formation: Lower Wilcox Group Age: Late Paleocene to Early Eocene Location: Shelf edge at the Central Gulf Coast Region of Texas Seismic data: Donated by a petroleum exploration company in Houston, Texas Analysis tools: Seismic attributes such as instantaneous phase, root-mean-square amplitude, and spectral decomposition
3
Le Roy, Charlotte, and Claude Rangin. "Cenozoic crustal deformation of the offshore Burgos basin region (NE Gulf of Mexico). A new interpretation of deep penetration multichannel seismic reflection lines." Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France 179, no. 2 (2008): 161–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.2113/gssgfbull.179.2.161.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract Along northeastern Mexico close to the Texas-Mexico border, the Burgos basin and its extension offshore was developed and deformed from the Paleocene up to Present time. This is a key triple junction between the sub meridian dextral transtensive coastal plain of the Gulf of Mexico extending far to the south in Mexico, the NE Corsair fault zone offshore and the sinistral Rio Bravo fault zone, a reactivated segment of the Texas lineament. Offshore NE Mexico, in the main study area covered by available seismic profiles, we have evidenced below the main well known gravitational décollement level (5 to 7 s twtt → 6 to 8 km) a Cenozoic deep-rooted deformation outlined by a N010° W trending deep-seated reverse fault zone and crustal folding down to the Moho (11 s twtt → ~ 20 km). Based on extensive offshore 2D industrial multi-channel seismic reflection surveys, deep exploration wells and gravimetric data, we focus our study on the deep crustal fabric and its effects on the gravitational tectonics in the upper sedimentary layers: submeridian crustal transtensional normal faults and open folding of the identified Mesozoic basement were interpreted as Cenozoic buckling of the crust during a major phase of oblique crustal extension. This deformation has probably enhanced gravity sliding along N030° growth-faults related to salt withdrawal and halokinesis in the offshore Burgos basin. We have tentatively made a link between this crustal deformation episode and the Neogene tectonic inversion of the Laramide foredeep basin of the Sierra Madre Oriental. The latter is still affected by crustal strike slip faulting associated with basaltic volcanism observed into the gulf coastal plain. This study favours a dominant crustal Cenozoic tectonic activity along the gulf margin without any clear evidence of Mesozoic tectonic reactivation. We propose that the large gravity collapse of the gulf margin was triggered by subsequent crustal deformation.
4
Kennedy, W. J., and W. A. Cobban. "Upper Cretaceous (upper Santonian) Boehmoceras fauna from the Gulf Coast region of the United States." Geological Magazine 128, no. 2 (1991): 167–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0016756800018355.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractAn upper Santonian fauna dominated by the curved baculitid Boehmoceras Riedel, 1931, occurs as phosphatic moulds in the Tombigbee Sand Member of the Eutaw Formation in Mississippi and Alabama, and also is reworked into the base of the Mooreville Chalk; a similar assemblage is present in the middle part of the Pen Formation of the Big Bend area, Texas. The assemblage is: Pseudoschloenbachia (Pseudoschloenbachia) mexicana (Renz, 1936), Placenticeras syrtale (Morton, 1834), Reginaites leei (Reeside, 1927a), Reginaites exilis sp. nov., Texanites (Texanites) sp. juv. cf. gallicus Collignon, 1948, Texanites (Plesiotexanites) shiloensis Young, 1963, Texanitinae incertae sedis, Hyphantoceras (?) amapondense (van Hoepen, 1921).Glyptoxoceras spp., Boehmoceras arculus (Morton, 1834) and Scaphites (Scaphites) leei Reeside, 1927a, form I. The assemblage is referred to the uppermost Santonian Texanites (Plesiotexanites) shiloensis zone of the Gulf Coast sequence. Common occurrence of Scaphites (S.) leei I and Reginaites leei suggest correlation with the Upper Santonian Desmoscaphites erdmanni zone of the U.S. Western Interior; common occurrence of Boehmoceras arculus (= B. loescheri of European authors) suggests correlation with the Marsupites–granulata zone at the top of the North German Santonian. These data strengthen intercontinental correlation of the Santonian–Campanian boundary sequence. They also provide a biostratigraphic link to a numerical age of 84.2±0.9 Ma from a bentonite at a slightly lower level in the Tombigbee Sand Member of the Eutaw Formation in Mississippi.
5
Ali, Syed Haroon, Osman M. Abdullatif, Lamidi O. Babalola, et al. "Sedimentary facies, depositional environments and conceptual outcrop analogue (Dam Formation, early Miocene) Eastern Arabian Platform, Saudi Arabia: a new high-resolution approach." Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology 11, no. 6 (2021): 2497–518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13202-021-01181-7.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractThis paper presents the facies and depositional environment of the early Miocene Dam Formation, Eastern Arabian platform, Saudi Arabia. Deposition of Dam Formation (Fm.) was considered as a restricted shallow marine deposition. Few studies suggest the role of sea-level change in its deposition but were without decisive substantiation. Here, we describe the facies and high-resolution model of Dam Fm. under varying depositional conditions. The depositional conditions were subjected to changing relative sea level and tectonics. High-resolution outcrop photographs, sedimentological logs, and thin sections present that the mixed carbonate–siliciclastic sequence was affected by a regional tectonics. The lower part of Dam Fm. presents the development of carbonate ramp conditions that are represented by limestones and marl. The depositional conditions fluctuated with the fall of sea level, and uplift in the region pushed the siliciclastic down-dip and covered the whole platform. The subsequent rise in sea level was not as pronounced and thus allowed the deposition of microbial laminites and stromatolitic facies. The southeast outcrops, down-dip, are more carbonate prone as compared to the northwest outcrop, which allowed the deposition of siliciclastic-prone sedimentation up-dip. All facies, architecture, heterogeneity, and deposition were controlled by tectonic events including uplift, subsidence, tilting, and syn-sedimentary faulting, consequently affecting relative sea level. The resulting conceptual outcrop model would help to improve our understanding of mixed carbonate–siliciclastic systems and serve as an analogue for other stratigraphic units in the Arabian plate and region. Our results show that Dam Fm. can be a good target for exploration in the Northern Arabian Gulf.
6
Rigby, J., and Ann Millward. "A Look Back at the Permian Reefs of West Texas and New Mexico." Earth Sciences History 7, no. 2 (1988): 71–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.17704/eshi.7.2.j4jk778715n4q664.
Full textAbstract:
The Permian reef complexes of West Texas and New Mexico are among the classic carbonate sequences in the world and have significantly influenced geologic thinking for over half a century. Study of the reefs can be subdivided into 6 broad periods. The first period involved early exploration of the region, establishment of regional stratigraphic relationships and attempts at dating stratigraphic units. The Guadalupian Fauna typifies this early period. The second period, during the 1920-30's, was a time of early petroleum exploration in the region, following on discovery of the Kendrick Field in Winkler County, Texas, and resulted in attempts to explain the complicated subsurface stratigraphy. Development of a marginal reef model and research on facies relationships between the basin and shelf resulted in refinement of stratigraphic nomenclature.The third period, here termed the King period, was a time of more intense study of the outcrops and their subsurface extensions. It was a time when facies became more clearly differentiated and when the great diversity and abundance of fossils in the region became appreciated. This period ended when World War II curtailed research in the region. The fourth period began after the war, with heightened interest in reefs and paleoecology. It was a time when carbonate petrology and paleoecology rose as major fields of interest. It was also a time of mega-paleontology. Tens of tons of fossiliferous limestones were processed at the U.S. National Museum and the American Museum of Natural History and collections of literally millions of fossils were assembled. The earlier publication of Geology of the Southern Guadalupe Mountains, Texas and the later publication of The Permian Reef Complex of the Guadalupe Mountains Region, Texas and New Mexico characterize the period.The fifth period is marked by the return of industry investigators to study the reefs and associated rocks, perhaps spurred as much by Dunham's "Vadose pisolites in the Capitan reef" as by any single paper. The period was one of concern about origins of the distinctive pisolites of the complex, nature of the massive Capitan Limestone, diagenesis of carbonates and by concern for understanding the economically significant rocks of the backreef sequence. The sixth period, termed the Wisconsin phase, continued research along lines of the fifth period but was a time when faculty and students of the University of Wisconsin, and their associates, re-examined all facies of the Guadalupe Mountain reef complexes as a major effort, while industry became less broadly involved. Those efforts, and those now initiated by faculty and students of the University of Nebraska and Rice University, bring us essentially to date, but much still remains to be discovered and understood about the reef complexes.
7
Frederick, Bruce C., Mike D. Blum, John W. Snedden, and Richard H. Fillon. "Early Mesozoic synrift Eagle Mills Formation and coeval siliciclastic sources, sinks, and sediment routing, northern Gulf of Mexico basin." GSA Bulletin 132, no. 11-12 (2020): 2631–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1130/b35493.1.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract The sedimentary architecture and provenance of the early Mesozoic incipient northern Gulf of Mexico basin remains controversial due to both lack of outcrop exposure and sample scarcity across the southern United States with subcrop depths approaching 6 km. The Eagle Mills Formation and coeval deposition across the northern Gulf of Mexico provides both a stratigraphic foundation for some ∼15-km-thick overlying Mesozoic and Cenozoic deposits, and a coeval pre-salt equivalent for southern synrift deposits, in one of the most economically significant hydrocarbon basins in the world. This study presents more than 3200 new detrital zircon U-Pb analyses from sixteen Late Triassic pre-salt, siliciclastic, subcrop well samples, and combines over 14,000 linear kilometers of 2-D multi-channel seismic reflection data, 1511 geophysical well logs, and biostratigraphic data from 2478 wells to construct basin-scale pre-salt isochore and structure maps spanning the northern Gulf of Mexico margin from Florida to the USA-Mexican border. The data show that incipient Gulf of Mexico paleodrainage pathways held individual distinctions between basement sources and tectonic controls in three primary regions across the northern Gulf of Mexico: (1) The western Gulf of Mexico paleodrainage extended from the Central Texas uplift highlands to the submarine Potosi Fan on the western margin of Laurentia with local tributary sources from the East Mexico Arc, Yucatán/Maya, and Marathon-Ouachita provinces as evidenced by inverse Monte Carlo unmixing of peri-Gondwanan (ca. 700–500 Ma), Appalachian/Ouachita (500–280 Ma), Grenville (1250–950 Ma), and Mid-Continent/Granite-Rhyolite Province (1500–1300 Ma) detrital zircon ages. Isochore and associated geophysical well and seismic data suggest that by Early Jurassic time this depocenter had shifted into the present-day western Gulf of Mexico as East Mexico Arc development continued. (2) Southerly drainage in the north-central Gulf of Mexico region bifurcated around the Sabine and Monroe uplifted terranes with southwestern flow characterized by peri-Gondwanan detrital zircon ages from late Paleozoic accreted basement or discrete flexural successor basins, and southeastern fluvial networks distinguished by traditional North American basement province sources including Grenville, Mid-Continent, and Yavapai-Mazatzal. (3) Eastern Gulf of Mexico regional paleodrainage, with regional southern flow dictated by the brittle extensional tectonics of the South Georgia Rift as well as the regional southern flexure of the South Florida Basin, resulted in almost all pre-salt detrital zircon siliciclastic ages from this region to be dominated by local Gondwanan/peri-Gondwanan aged sources including the proximal Suwannee terrane and Osceola Granite complex. These regional, synrift sediment provenance models provide the first critical allochthonous evidence of Late Triassic–Early Jurassic paleodrainage stemming from the Appalachian-Ouachita hinterlands into the incipient northern Gulf of Mexico basin with critical implications for pre-salt hydrocarbon exploration and carbon sequestration reservoir potential.
8
Filkorn, Harry F. "A new species of Mexicaprina (Caprinidae, Coalcomaninae) and review of the age and paleobiogeography of the genus." Journal of Paleontology 76, no. 4 (2002): 672–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022336000041949.
Full textAbstract:
A species of the rudist bivalve genus Mexicaprina Coogan, 1973, from the mid-Cretaceous Mai Paso Formation of the Guerrero terrane, southwestern Mexico, is described as new: M. alata. At the type locality of this new species, a 6.5 m thick Mexicaprina-rich floatstone bed conformably overlies a taxonomically diverse build-up of reef corals. This type of facies relationship and implied faunal association has not been observed previously at any other site. Specimens of the type species, M. cornuta Coogan, 1973, also were found at the same locality, but 90 m stratigraphically below the lowest occurrence of M. alata. Compilation and detailed biostratigraphic analysis of the reported occurrences of Mexicaprina demonstrate that the age of the genus ranges from late Albian to early Cenomanian. However, most occurrences are late Albian and the Cenomanian age determinations are questionable and possibly late Albian also. The occurrence of species of Mexicaprina in the allochthonous Guerrero terrane, together with the relatively limited geographic distribution of the genus in the late Albian and early Cenomanian of the Gulf Coast of Mexico, Texas, and Honduras, indicates that this region of the Guerrero terrane was part of the Caribbean paleobiogeographic province during late Albian to early Cenomanian time. This occurrence also suggests that this portion of the Guerrero terrane was very close, possibly accreted, to the southwestern margin of North America by the close of the Early Cretaceous.
9
Sierra-Rojas, María I., Roberto S. Molina-Garza, and Timothy F. Lawton. "The Lower Cretaceous Atzompa Formation In South-Central Mexico: Record of Evolution From Extensional Backarc Basin Margin To Carbonate Platform." Journal of Sedimentary Research 86, no. 6 (2016): 712–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2016.45.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract: Lower Cretaceous depositional systems of southwestern Oaxaquia, in south-central Mexico, were influenced by initiation of a continental arc on mainland Mexico and subsequent accretion of the Guerrero composite arc terrane to mainland Mexico. The Atzompa Formation, defined herein, which crops out in the Sierra de Tentzo, constitutes a succession of conglomerate, sandstone, siltstone, and limestone with Early Cretaceous fauna and detrital zircon maximum depositional ages that range 126–123 Ma (late Barremian to early Aptian). The lower part of the Atzompa records a transition from alluvial to deep lacustrine depositional environments, suggesting the early stages of an extensional basin; overlying deposits of anabranching axial fluvial systems that flowed to the NE–SE accumulated after a period of rapid subsidence in the Tentzo basin, also formerly undescribed. Fluvial facies grade up-section to tidal deposits overlain in turn by a carbonate ramp succession that contains late Barremian to early Aptian fossils. The ramp deposits of the uppermost Atzompa Formation are overlain on a sharp contact by basinal carbonates of early Albian age.The Tentzo basin, formed due to crustal extension of the overriding plate in a backarc setting, was characterized by very high rates of sedimentation (3.6 mm/yr) during the early stages of basin formation (rift initiation and rift climax), and slower rates during the development of tidal systems and the carbonate ramp (post-rift stage). Regional and local subsidence took place in the backarc region of the Zicapa magmatic arc, which was established in the western margin of Mexico by Hauterivian time. Abrupt deepening following Atzompa Formation deposition is attributed to flexural subsidence related to collision of the Guerrero composite volcanic terrane with the western margin of Mexico. Following late Aptian accretion of the Guerrero terrane to Oaxaquia, the carbonate basin eventually shallowed to become a carbonate platform that faced the Gulf of Mexico.
10
Bayless, Jeff. "Regional attenuation models in Central and Eastern North America using the NGA-East database." Earthquake Spectra 37, no. 1_suppl (2021): 1460–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/87552930211018704.
Full textAbstract:
The anelastic attenuation term found in ground motion prediction equations (GMPEs) represents the distance dependence of the effect of intrinsic and scattering attenuation on the wavefield as it propagates through the crust and contains the frequency-dependent quality factor, [Formula: see text], which is an inverse measure of the effective anelastic attenuation. In this work, regional estimates of [Formula: see text] in Central and Eastern North America (CENA) are developed using the NGA-East regionalization. The technique employed uses smoothed Fourier amplitude spectrum (FAS) data from well-recorded events in CENA as collected and processed by NGA-East. Regional [Formula: see text] is estimated using an assumption of average geometrical spreading applicable to the distance ranges considered. Corrections for the radiation pattern effect and for site response based on [Formula: see text] result in a small but statistically significant improvement to the residual analysis. Apparent [Formula: see text] estimates from multiple events are combined within each region to develop the regional models. Models are provided for three NGA-East regions: the Gulf Coast, Central North America, and the Appalachian Province. Consideration of the model uncertainties suggests that the latter two regions could be combined. There were not sufficient data to adequately constrain the model in the Atlantic Coastal Plain region. Tectonically stable regions are usually described by higher [Formula: see text] and weaker frequency dependence ([Formula: see text]), while active regions are typically characterized by lower [Formula: see text] and stronger frequency dependence, and the results are consistent with these expectations. Significantly different regional [Formula: see text] is found for events with data recorded in multiple regions, which supports the NGA-East regionalization. An inspection of two well-recorded events with data both in the Mississippi embayment and in southern Texas indicates that the Gulf Coast regionalization by Cramer in 2017 may be an improvement to that of NGA-East for anelastic attenuation. The [Formula: see text] models developed serve as epistemic uncertainty alternatives in CENA based on a literature review and a comparison with previously published models.
11
Lowery, Christopher M., and R. Mark Leckie. "Biostratigraphy of the Cenomanian–turonian Eagle Ford Shale of South Texas." Journal of Foraminiferal Research 47, no. 2 (2017): 105–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.2113/gsjfr.47.2.105.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract The Cenomanian–Turonian Eagle Ford Shale of south Texas occupies an important gateway between the Western Interior Seaway (WIS) of North America and the Gulf of Mexico. While the Eagle Ford north of the San Marcos Arch and its stratigraphic equivalents to the east of the Sabine Arch are shallow-water sediments dominated by terrigenous clastics, the more distal localities in south Texas are dominated by hemi-pelagic carbonates draped over an Early Cretaceous carbonate platform, called the Comanche Platform, and adjacent submarine plateaus and basins. This region was strongly affected by major oceanographic changes during the Cenomanian-Turonian, particularly a significant transgression that drove localized upwelling and organic matter burial in the Lower Eagle Ford prior to the global Oceanic Anoxic Event 2 (OAE2). These pre-OAE2 organic-rich shales are the basis of Eagle Ford shale gas play, which has spurred commercial and academic research into many aspects of the geology of the Eagle Ford Group. Much of this research has been fairly locally focused, and little effort has been made to understand the timing of events across the platform. We compared new data from three study sites across south Texas—Lozier Canyon in Terrell Co.; Bouldin Creek in Travis Co., near the San Marcos Arch in the center of the Comanche Platform; and Swift Energy's Fasken Core in Webb Co., off the platform on the Rio Grande Submarine Plateau—as well as published data from near Big Bend National Park on the western margin, and from Atacosta and Karnes counties on the eastern margin. Using these data we document the occurrence of key foraminiferal species across the platform and present a regional biostratigraphic scheme incorporating five global planktic foraminiferal zones (and contemporaneous occurrences that may serve as proxies for the zonal markers, which tend to be rare in Texas) and four local origination or acme events that serve as useful secondary markers. The succession of events is: 1) highest occurrence (HO) Favusella washitensis, 2) lowest occurrence (LO) Rotalipora cushmani, 3) “Benthonic Zone”, 4) HO R. cushmani and/or Thalmaninella greenhornensis, 5) “Heterohelix shift”, 6) LO “Anomalina W”, 7) LO Helvetoglobotruncana helvetica, 8) HO H. sp., and 9) LO Dicarinella concavata. Overall, we show that lithologic and geochemical trends through most of the Eagle Ford, particularly the oxygenation at the onset of OAE2 and the concurrent shift to more carbonate-rich lithologies, are synchronous across the Comanche Platform. However, the transition from the Eagle Ford Group to the Austin Chalk varies in age. While Austin Chalk deposition began in the middle Turonian Marginotruncana schneegansi Zone on the Rio Grande Submarine Plateau, a transgressive surface on the Comanche Platform (known as the “Rubble Zone” in central Texas) represents a condensed interval at the top of the Eagle Ford that ends in the upper Turonian D. concavata Zone. This is part of a transgressive disconformity that extends north through the WIS, where it is associated with the Juana Lopez Calcarenite.
12
Fernando P. Siringan, John B. Ander. "Seismic Facies, Architecture, and Evolution of the Bolivar Roads Tidal Inlet/Delta Complex, East Texas Gulf Coast." SEPM Journal of Sedimentary Research Vol. 63 (1993). http://dx.doi.org/10.1306/d4267c08-2b26-11d7-8648000102c1865d.
Full text
13
Li, Meibai, Ellen M. Rathje, Brady R. Cox, and Michael Yust. "A Texas-specific VS30 map incorporating geology and VS30 observations." Earthquake Spectra, August 25, 2021, 875529302110336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/87552930211033622.
Full textAbstract:
A Texas-specific [Formula: see text] map that uses geostatistical kriging integrated with a region-specific geologic proxy, field measurements of [Formula: see text], and P-wave seismogram estimates of [Formula: see text] is developed. The region-specific geologic proxy is used first to predict [Formula: see text] from the surface geologic conditions across the state, and then geostatistical kriging with an external drift is used to incorporate the local [Formula: see text] measurements/estimates into the map. Compared with the [Formula: see text] map of Texas developed from a topographic slope proxy, the Texas-specific [Formula: see text] map predicts larger [Formula: see text] values across much of Texas, except for the Gulf Coast region where the values are similar. The utilization of kriging brings the Texas-specific [Formula: see text] map into better agreement with the in situ measurements and estimates of [Formula: see text]. The sensitivity of predicted ground motions by ShakeMap to changes in [Formula: see text] values is evaluated with a scenario earthquake in the Dallas–Fort Worth area. The results suggest smaller predicted ground motions due to the generally larger values of [Formula: see text] in the Texas-specific [Formula: see text] map as compared to the [Formula: see text] from the topographic proxy.
14
BLUM, MICHAEL D., University of Neb. "Abstract: Quaternary Alluvial Plains and Incised Valleys, Texas Gulf Coastal Plain: Chronology, Stratigraphic Architecture, and Facies Organization." AAPG Bulletin 82 (1998). http://dx.doi.org/10.1306/00aa81e8-1730-11d7-8645000102c1865d.
Full text
15
Carr, David L.1, M. Turhan Taner2,. "ABSTRACT: Using a hybrid seismic attribute to differentiate lithologies and facies in a deltaic system, Texas Gulf Coast, U.S.A." AAPG Bulletin 84 (2000). http://dx.doi.org/10.1306/a96742f6-1738-11d7-8645000102c1865d.
Full text
16
W. C. Riese, R. S. Olsen. "Submarine Fan Facies Analysis Using Well Logs and 3-D Seismic: An Example from Miocene of Texas Gulf Coast: ABSTRACT." AAPG Bulletin 71 (1987). http://dx.doi.org/10.1306/9488764a-1704-11d7-8645000102c1865d.
Full text
17
Ryan Birkenfeld1, Zuhair Al-Shaieb2. "ABSTRACT: Sequence Stratigraphy as a Major Control of Depositional Facies of the Vicksburg Formation in the South Texas Gulf Coast Area." AAPG Bulletin 85 (2001). http://dx.doi.org/10.1306/8626d65d-173b-11d7-8645000102c1865d.
Full text
18
W. A. Ambrose, N. Tyler. "Facies Heterogeneity, Pay Continuity, and Infill Potential in Barrier-Island, Fluvial, and Submarine Fan Reservoirs: Examples from the Texas Gulf Coast and Midland Basin: ABSTRACT." AAPG Bulletin 73 (1989). http://dx.doi.org/10.1306/703c9bbd-1707-11d7-8645000102c1865d.
Full text