Academic literature on the topic 'Fathers and sons – Religious aspects – Christianity'

In the opening decades of the nineteenth century, Samuel Brown Wylie, an Irish-Presbyterian minister of a group of Scottish and Scots-Irish Presbyterians known as the Covenanters, and William Findley, a United States Congressman and also a descendant of the Covenanters, debated the Constitution's compatibility with Christianity and the proper bounds of religious uniformity in the newly founded Republic. Their respective views were diametrically opposed, yet each managed to borrow from different aspects of earlier political traditions held in common while also laying the groundwork for contrasting political positions which would more fully develop in the decades to come. And more than a few times their views seem to criss-cross, supporting contrary trajectories from what one might expect.Their narrative, in many ways strange, challenges certain “Christian” understandings of early America and the Constitution, yet it also poses a few problems for attempts at a coherent theory of secularity, natural law, and the common good in our own day.Samuel Brown Wylie is an obscure figure in American history. As a Covenanter, Wylie was forced to immigrate to America due to his involvement in the revolutionary United-Irishmen in Ulster. After finding it impossible to unite with other Presbyterians in Pennsylvania, Wylie became the first minister in the “Reformed Presbyterian Church of the United States,” which would also be called “the Synod of the Reformed Presbyterian Church.” According to his great-grandson, Wylie also went on to become the vice-Provost of the University of Pennsylvania.

This study examines depression among Latter-day Saint teens, particularly how religiosity and the parent–child relationship are associated with depressive symptomology. Although there is an abundance of research on adolescent depression and on adolescent religiosity, there is less research addressing the connection between the two. The research questions include: Does religiosity among Latter-day Saint teens reduce their rates of depression? What aspects of religiosity affect depression most significantly? How does religious coping influence depression? How does the parent–child relationship affect depression rates among Latter-day Saint teens? Being a sexual minority and living in Utah were related to higher levels of depression. Greater depression was also associated with more anxiety and poorer physical health. Authoritative parenting by fathers was associated with lower depression for daughters but not sons. Finally, feeling abandoned by God was related to higher depression, while peer support at church was associated with lower depression.

This field research report summarizes the results of interviews during special research trips to Daghestan from 1992-96. These interviews were conducted with both secular and religious leaders in villages, district centers, and the capital of Makhachkala. We found indigenous cultures, ethnic identities, and the entire North Caucasus region in transition from a Russian sphere of cultural and political influence to that of Islam, epitomized by a split cultural and generational identity of fathers versus sons. Yet indigenous cultures show great resilience toward both the former Soviet influences of atheism and modemization and the contemporary revival of Islam, which seeks to integrate all aspects of individual and community life. Curiously, just like the British Empire, the former imperial Soviet State evokes ambivalent feelings of nostalgia and admiration, mixed with apprehension, while Islam now appears as the major agent transformation of indigenous cultures toward a new geo-political identity.

Teesid: 20. sajandil on esile kerkinud mitmeid teatrisuundi, mis on kritiseerinud ja püüdnud ületada Lääne traditsioonilise teatri väidetavat sõnakesksust ning samuti selle võimetust täita n-ö püha kunsti funktsioone. Kuigi seda pühadusedefitsiiti on püütud leevendada ennekõike orientaalsetest teatrivormidest inspiratsiooni ammutades, aitab selle võimalikku tekkelugu mõista ka katoliikliku kultuuri mõjuväljas võrsunud teatrikunsti ning teatrivaenulikuma ortodoksi teoloogia kontekstis välja töötatud ikooniteoloogia võrdlus. Kõrvutades nende kahe konfessiooni teoloogilis-esteetilisi arusaamu, saame analüüsida ka performatiivsuse esteetika seisukohast olulisi kunstiteose loome- ja tajutingimuste vormilisi ja meelelisi aspekte ning nende toimet sakraalse kunsti sihtide seisukohast.SU M M A R YIn the 21st century Western society has seen an increasing interest in topics related to religion. In this context, the connection between the concept of sacrality in Western culture and freedom of verbal and artistic expression has been reconsidered; the very possibility of so-called sacred art within Western culture has been called into question.Already in the 20th century several theatrical movements in the West have expressed the need to strive for religious (or at least quasi-religious) goals by means of the stage. This can already be seen in the work of the symbolists, but such experiments accelerated and became more forceful under the influence of Antonin Artaud’s visions and under the aegis of intercultural theatre. In all of these different quests one can find common elements: discontent with the discursivity of the theatrical canon, a need for a metaphysical dimension in the theatre, and the belief that channels of perception can be opened through contact with exotic ritual cultures.In his book Sacred Theatre Ralph Yarrow has attempted to define the criteria of sacrality in the theatre, drawing upon William S. Haney’s prior determinations, which emphasizes first, that sacred theatre induces a change of consciousness in which the subject and the object merge; second, the liminality of the intersubjective environment surrounding the experience of the sacred, in which the verbal and the transcendental unite. When describing the influence of the logocentrism of Christian culture on the experience of sacredness, Yarrow draws on the views of Mark C. Taylor, Rudolf Otto, Mircea Eliade and Georges Bataille. All of these thinkers critique the rationalism attributed to monotheistic religion, which gives an important place to Christ as the mediator of God’s transcendental truth, the logos, and sacred scripture, all of which differ from the numinous experience of the mystic. The art of so-called sacred theatre, where, at least according to tradition, the performative mission, dramaturgy, stage design, and public reception are all part of a unified contemplative whole seems to be missing in Western culture. Indeed, this is what several Western stage experimenters have been looking for, and in their search they have looked eastward.New viewpoints with respect to the perception of a work of art were gained in the „performative turn“ of the end of the 20th century; besides the text, proponents of this new direction became interested in the sensory and bodily processes of creativity and reception. Erika Fischer-Lichte and others have conceptualized these processes on a more general level and reflected upon the aesthetics of performativity; insodoing they have pointed to a dualism in the Western aesthetics of performativity, recognizing that there is a contradiction between the referential, semiotic pole of art and its performative dimension. Although the reasons for this split can be sought in the very origins of Western art as well as that of medieval Christian art, relations between theatre and the church differ according to confession; Yarrow’s definitions do not apply to Christianity as a whole. As distinct from the Catholic church, which, occasional polemics notwithstanding, has been a good neighbour to theatre from the medieval period onward, Orthodox theology has been more wary of theatre, or at least regarded the media and goals of theatre as incompatible with the goals of sacred art.Despite this difference of context, the iconographer of Eastern art and the theatre avant-gardist who longs for sacrality in Western logocentric theatre focus on similar mechanisms and processes. With respect to the origin and development of medieval religious art one might generalize that while the centre of Orthodox liturgy is the fellowship of holy communion, in the Western Church a drive toward analysis and interpretation arose alongside the experience of communion. This analytic drive facilitated the development of interpretive scholastics which translated theology by means of formal logic. Also, a dramaturgic aspect began increasingly to differentiate itself from the Mass and holy communion, finding more commonality with theatre as an independent art form. In the Eastern Church, which preserved the theological heritage of the Church Fathers was preserved, the theology of the icon was developed. According to this, sacred art could not be regarded apart from its liturgical context, nor could an independent aesthetic value be attached to it. The platonic roots of Orthodox theology led to the perpetuation of the attitude of the Church Fathers: theatre could endanger the health of the soul or prevent the pursuit of spiritual goals, that is theosis, because the fictional world of theatre blurs truth and human identity, drawing both the performer and the viewer toward affectivity and escapism. However, despite its conservative theology of the icon, which deplored realism and emotionality, the Orthodox church had its own aesthetic of performativity, which in addition to content draws attention to the creative, functional and perceptual prerequisites for sacred art.The theological and aesthetic differences between Catholicism and the Orthodox church are also reflected today in the theologically-inclined reception of works with religious content. For example, based on the lively theological feedback to Mel Gibson’s 2004 film, The Sufferings of Christ one might claim that the judgments of Catholics mostly concern the m e s s a g e of the work, the appropriateness of its content, that is the referential pole; Orthodox theologians rather place more emphasis on the appropriateness of the m e d i u m to theological goals, that is, the performative effect of the work of art. Besides differences in pure artistic representation, it is also worth examining such questions as Catholic and Orthodox interpretations of the Trinity or the teaching of Gregorius Palamas (1296–1359) on divine energies, which were later declared to be heretical. Thus Orthodox liturgical practice seems to contradict many of the stereotypes that eastward-turning seekers of sacred theatre have attributed to Western sacral culture as a whole, overlooking aspects of dynamism that can be found in the Eastern Christian church. This topic has been discussed in several recent accounts of iconography, which examine the performativity of the icon, distinguishing its processes of creation and perception from the Western representation-oriented concept of the picture (eg Bissera V. Pencheva, Adrian Gorea).Granted, one should be careful when drawing parallels between the strictly rule-bound theology of the icon and aesthetics of performativity focused on the sensory aspect of art. However, this article takes the position that what should be emphasized are the differences between Orthodox and Catholic views of art, by means of which one can elucidate the points of departure of the Western quest for sacred theatre and the performative level to which it aspires.

This research was concerned with the possible effects that religion, especially conservative Protestantism, has upon the performance of fatherhood. The influence of religion was assessed using the religious beliefs reported by fathers. The performance of fatherhood focused on the amount of time fathers spent meeting the physical needs of their young children. This research hypothesized that conservative Protestant fathers would spend more time meeting their children's physical needs than other Protestant fathers. Also hypothesized was that the level of conservative Protestant beliefs held by fathers is positively related to the proportion of time they spent meeting the physical needs of their children out of the total time spent by fathers and mothers combined. Finally, it was hypothesized that the level of conservative Protestant beliefs held by fathers was positively related to their membership in conservative religious denominations. In order to test whether conservative Protestantism has an effect upon the amount of time that fathers spend meeting the physical needs of their young children, this study will used data from the first wave of the National Survey of Families and Households (NSFH), completed in 1988. Regression analysis was used to test the first two hypotheses and crosstabulation analysis was used to test the third hypothesis. The first two hypotheses were not supported. However, interaction was detected between the variables of race and conservative Protestantism. Specifically, Black conservative Protestant fathers consistently did more childcare than Black non-conservative Protestant fathers, and all other Protestant fathers, whether conservative or not. The third hypothesis was accepted because an index of conservative beliefs was established using denominational labels. Like other recent studies, there was a lack of consensus about which variables predict how much time fathers will spend with their children. This study also points out the need for further research concerned with conservative Protestants and the impact of their beliefs on families.

Résumé<p><p>de la thèse « Le chemin de la vérité :la persuasion de la puissance divine dans le Contre Celse d’Origène <p><p><p>Les traités du Contre Celse permettent d’aborder la problématique de la persuasion de l’enseignement chrétien en ce qu'ils témoignent de l’affrontement virulent de deux visions du monde, - celle du monde gréco-romain et celle de l’enseignement chrétien. En effet, l’essor du mouvement chrétien devrait beaucoup à la lumière de cette rhétorique, oserons-nous dire cette propagande, qui propose une vision du monde nouvelle en s’appuyant sur une théologie qui s’escrime à dépasser la culture gréco-romaine en l’intégrant dans sa propre vision du monde. En ce, l’École d’Alexandrie en général et Origène en particulier seraient les fondateurs d’une nouvelle lecture théologique tant du point de vue polythéiste que de celui du christianisme.<p>Du point de vue méthodologique, je me suis attelée à ce travail en constatant une insuffisance, pour ne pas dire un manque, d’études consacrées à la pratique rhétorique chez Origène. L’idée d’une rhétorique entendue comme un genre secondaire moins « noble », entre guillemets, que le théologique est sans doute la cause de cette lacune scientifique ;or, force est de constater que les Apologistes ayant précédé le penseurs alexandrin et lui-même sont souvent formés à la rhétorique ce qui ne va pas sans incidence directe sur leurs œuvres attendu que formation et méthodes font souvent un avec l’élaboration de savoirs.<p>L’objet immédiat du travail était de décrire et d’analyser par une lecture centrée sur la rhétorique apologétique les lieux communs et les arguments que celle-ci fournit, et qui affectent la structure de la pensée d’Origène. Pour mieux comprendre le processus de persuasion mis en œuvre par le théologien, j’ai pensé que les topoï qu’il emprunte au savoir classique étaient des éléments tangibles qu’il convenait de prendre au sérieux plutôt que de la ranger au placard des vieilleries scolaires. Somme, mon soupçon, ma seconde approche du corpus, était qu’au travers du plus banal de son œuvre, - son infrastructure scolaire-, je toucherai son originalité. Il restait à prouver si ce paradoxe pouvait s’avérer fécond en analysant le discours d’Origène et en m’efforçant de réévaluer, réinterpréter et intégrer dans les recherches portant sur son œuvre la question négligée de sa pratique rhétorique. Somme toute, j’ai tenté de mieux comprendre comment l’homme de l’Antiquité posait la question du sens. <p>Le plan d’ensemble de ma thèse comprend deux parties. Dans la première partie, j’ai dégagé les grandes lignes de l’approche rhétorique d’Origène en prenant pour fil conducteur la question de la véracité de la révélation qui s’impose comme le thème dominant de son entreprise. Ceci m’a conduit à l’examen de l’idée d’autonomie, que celle-ci agisse sur la pensée comme force centripète ou centrifuge, permettant tantôt de se démarquer en minimisant, voire en gommant les différences, tantôt de les exalter en les proclamant. Dans la deuxième partie, j’ai essayé de démontrer les éléments historiques et philosophiques à partir desquels le modèle de la pensée chrétienne a été configuré. J’ai ainsi dégagé l’idée que le récit évangélique a été élaboré tout à la fois par rapport aux modèles de l’histoire « sainte » biblique et les modèles généalogiques de la tradition gréco-romaine. <p>En premier lieu, j’ai démontré que la démarche apologétique d’Origène consistait à faire se côtoyer la puissance persuasive de la parole transcendante et celle de la parole rhétorique humaine. Or « faire se côtoyer » la puissance persuasive de la parole transcendante et celle de la parole rhétorique ne signifie pas pour autant les mettre sur le même pied. On peut donc affirmer la conjonction de la « rhétorique » ineffable de la puissance divine et de la « bonne rhétorique » dans la méthode apologétique d’Origène.<p><p>L’apologétique chrétienne, s’engageant dans une relation de pouvoir par rapport aux « autres » concurrentiels, est amenée à construire la conception de la vérité chrétienne unique et la plus ancienne par opposition à la diversité des doctrines philosophiques et religieuses de la tradition gréco-romaine, et en continuité avec la doctrine hébraïque perçue comme dépassée. En effet, la vérité chrétienne est identifiée à l’origine, à la pureté et à l’essence. De là les deux arguments apologétiques les plus puissants :démontrer l’unité et l’ancienneté de la doctrine chrétienne et donc construire une généalogie à partir d’une seule source originelle, Dieu. En postulant une « vérité absolue » qu’on identifie avec Jésus Christ, le Logos, l’apologiste interprète les enseignements de ses adversaires comme une déviation de cette vérité ou comme une vérité dépassée. Le double chemin vers l’origine est donc symboliquement barré. Par ailleurs, l’apologiste élabore une forme d’échelle de vérité où les rivaux de l’enseignement chrétien ne sont que des moyens rhétoriques pour démontrer la supériorité chrétienne.<p>L’élaboration de la conception de la vérité absolue chrétienne va de pair avec la constitution discursive de l’« autre ». En tenant compte de la relation discursive intersubjective, je parle d’une constitution discursive de l’« autre ». C’est précisément la finalité apologétique du Contre Celse qui nous permet d’affirmer le caractère construit de la notion de l’« autre » en tant que construction rhétorique. L’« autre », qu’il soit juif ou païen ou gnostique, est constitué à partir du projet chrétien. Mieux, il reçoit sa définition uniquement en fonction de sa différence avec le christianisme. Deux stratégies apologétiques s’imposent ainsi :d’une part minimiser, voire gommer, les différences internes au mouvement chrétien et grossir les différences avec l’« autre » et, d’autre part, grossir les différences en minimisant les ressemblances, en les décrivant comme une imitation ou un vol (le thème du larcin).<p>En second lieu, on peut affirmer que le mythe informe le « récit évangélique » dans la mesure où l’histoire individuelle de Jésus et le mythe du Christ se retrouvent fusionnés d’une manière inextricable dans la narration christologique. Le mythe apparaît ainsi comme une construction symbolique fondée sur les symboles et formes déjà existants ;mais, qui plus est, étant un récit, il reforme et transforme ces symboles dans une nouvelle structure propre à lui. Lorsque je parle du mythe chrétien, j’entends un système dynamique de schèmes qui, sous l’impulsion du schème général mythique de kat‹basiw-Žn‹basiw, tend à se configurer en récit évangélique. Ainsi, le mythe peut traduire l’accumulation d’« essaims » ou de « constellations » de schèmes. C’est en ce sens qu’on parle du message chrétien comme étant exprimé en un langage mythique. J’ai adopté le terme générique de « schème » dans le sens d’un modèle, une « engramme ».<p>L’ingéniosité chrétienne consiste à constituer le schéma mythique de kat‹basiw-Žn‹basiw, sur lequel repose le « mythe fondateur » chrétien. Il est fondé sur la conception d’une histoire sainte articulant expression mythique et expression historique au sein d’un schéma temporel finalisé. J’ai relevé trois modèles principaux de l’histoire sous-tendant les divers types de récits bibliques :l’histoire « blanche », l’histoire-fait, l’histoire-événement. L’histoire « blanche » présente les deux réalités, le « Même » et l’ « Autre », existant chacune pour soi et sans aucun contact entre elles. En revanche, l’histoire-fait présente leur communication en dehors du temps. Enfin, l’histoire-événement présente le passage de Celui qui agit d’un principe à l’autre dans un système où le temps se déroule. On peut retrouver ces modèles de l’histoire concrétisés dans un certain nombre de récits bibliques :le récit de la création, le récit de la séduction ou le récit du péché, le récit de l’alliance ou le récit de la médiation divine.<p>Enfin, j’ai étudié l’élaboration du « récit évangélique » par rapport à un certain nombre de récits qui se transposent et s’entrecroisent entre eux, à savoir le « récit de l’alliance », le « récit messianique » et le « récit généalogique ». La configuration du récit évangélique repose sur le jeu dynamique entre les récits identifiables déjà sédimentés dans des traditions différentes et le récit innovateur d’une déviance réglée. Le « récit évangélique » consiste en la combinaison unique de l’histoire et du mythe, qui se donne comme un récit fondateur mytho-historique. La prédication de Jésus met en place une historicisation du mythe. En même temps, avec les évangiles, on assiste à un processus de mythisation de Jésus qui aboutit à sa divinisation. L’élaboration du « récit évangélique » tire son intelligibilité de l’ensemble des opérations par lesquelles une herméneutique actualisante s’est transposée sur les récits et modèles anciens et les prophéties hébraïques. On peut affirmer que le « récit évangélique » a été configuré à la jonction des représentations bibliques et grecques.<p>L’originalité du christianisme consiste en la perspective universelle que le « récit évangélique » revêt. Ainsi, le devenir est divisé en trois temps qui sont reliés entre eux de manière structurée à travers l’intermédiaire divin de Jésus Christ qui assure les renvois théologiques et contrôle ainsi le monde de tout les temps.<p><br>Doctorat en philosophie et lettres, Orientation histoire des religions<br>info:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublished

Daniel Ferris Born, Ph.D. The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, 2016 Chair: Dr. William F. Cook The figurative use of "son(s) of" phrases in the NT represents the author employing the father-son relationship, and what this relationship represents in the ancient world, as a tool to illustrate and explain various concepts and ideas in NT thought. As a result, the father-son relationship in the ancient world must be employed in the interpretation of these figurative "son(s) of" phrases. Failing to understand the importance of genealogical identification, kinship, and the social implications of the father-son relationship in the ancient world and bring these concepts to bear in interpretation, will result in a failure to understand what the NT authors seek to communicate by using "son(s) of" phrases. Chapter 1 provides an introduction to this topic and a history of how linguists and commentators have approached these phrases in the past. There are very few scholars who have sought to employ the father-son relationship in their interpretation of these phrases and their figurative use. Chapters 2 and 3 survey the use of these phrases inside and outside the NT. Chapter 2 includes the use of בֵּן in the Hebrew Bible, "son(s) of" phrases in the LXX, as well as the use of υἱός plus the genitive in Classical Greek, the OT and NT apocrypha and pseudepigrapha, other early Jewish and Christian writings, coins and inscriptions, and the papyri and ostraca. Chapter 3 surveys the use of υἱός in the NT. Chapter 4 explores the father-son relationship in the social context of the NT in order to distill the major features of the father-son relationship into an interpretive framework which can be utilized in understanding what the NT authors seek to communicate in their figurative use of "son(s) of" phrases. Chapter 5 employs this framework in the interpretation of the figurative "son(s) of" phrases in the NT. Chapter 6 concludes the work, discusses its implications, and recognizes the need for further study in certain areas.

The purpose of this study is to examine if a relationship exists between paternal involvement during emerging adulthood and eudaimonic well-being in sons involved with Cru in the Great Lakes region in the United States. In order to execute this study, sons involved with Cru were surveyed through an adapted Father Involvement Scale and Carol Ryff’s Psychological Well-Being Scale. The design for this research is an explanatory, quantitative method. This quantitative research focused on emerging adult sons, involved with Cru in the Great Lakes region, between the ages of 18 to 25. An online survey was implemented to gather data regarding paternal involvement and well-being. The quantitative data were administered through Google Forms, and the results were analyzed through the execution of paired t-tests, Pearson’s r, Statcrunch, and multiple regression analysis. After the statistical analysis of collected data, 12 sons who completed the quantitative survey and agreed to be interviewed were randomly selected. These interviews served to illustrate quantitative results. The data indicate three aspects of father involvement, companionship, emotional development, and social development correlated to a son’s positive relationships and self-acceptance. Specifically, the data predict the more relational a father was with his son during the ages of 18 to 25 the healthier his son was in accepting himself and establishing positive relationships with others.

Der Vater stellt eine gewichtige gesellschaftliche Größe dar. Er ist neben der Mutter der bedeutendste Sozialisationsagent der frühen Kindheit. Er ist der Zeugende, wird Vater zu dem Zeitpunkt, zu dem die Frau das Kind zur Welt bringt. Eine soziale Rolle ,,Vaterschaft" entwickelt sich hieraus jedoch erst dadurch, dass er bestimmte Aufgaben, die sich im Zusammenhang mit dem Kind ergeben, erfüllt. Die Ausführungen nähern sich diesem überaus vielschichtigen Komplex ,,Vater" dermaßen, dass das Zusammenwirken von Vater und Kind als Interaktion aufgefasst wird und die Bedeutung des Vaters als Modell für das Kind dargestellt wird. ,,Christliche Erziehung" und ,,Rituale" sind die beiden anderen Dimensionen dieser Arbeit und erfahren durch das Thema ,,Vater" ihre inhaltliche Zuspitzung. Eine empirische Untersuchung von Vätern zu diesen Themen mittels Fragebogen ergänzt die theoretische Perspektive. Die vorliegende Arbeit hat das Ziel, die drei angedeuteten Spannungsfelder aufzugreifen, zusammenzudenken und als praktisch-theologische Arbeit einen Beitrag zur Reflexion und Förderung christlicher Vaterschaft zu leisten.<br>The father represents an important figure in society. Together with the mother he is the most important socialization-agent of early childhood. He is involved in the act of procreation and finally becomes father at the time his wife gives birth to their child. However, a social role "paternity" develops only through the fact that he fulfills certain tasks which are connected with the child. The dissertation approaches the extremely multilayered and complex subject "father" as follows: the cooperation between father and child is understood as interaction. The father´s role as model for the child is described. "Christian education" and "rituals" with regard to the topic "father" are the two other dimensions of this dissertation. An empirical survey of fathers about these topics by means of a questionnaire supplements the theoretical perspective. This Master-Dissertation would like to deal with the three mentioned areas, and - as practical-theological thesis - contribute to the reflection and promotion of Christian paternity.<br>Practical Theology<br>M.Th. (Practical theology)

A critical survey of early Church history, the works of the Church Fathers and several councils of the Church reveals a consistent call for unity. Heresies, politic intrigue and struggles for governance have aggravated attempts to remain in the union. The insistence on unity and the persistence of the Church to unify reveals an ontological reality. While our knowledge of the Church can be given in epistemological terms, looking at the Church to discover its essence, what it means to be church, opens a different way of encountering the Church and, eventually, understanding the nature of the Church to be one. The transformations in the early Church as it spread to new cultures, the impact on the Church at the founding of “New Rome” by the Emperor Constantine, the changes brought about when Constantinople fell to the Ottomans in 1453 and the resulting birth of the Renaissance in the West with the beginning of the autocephaly Church in Russia and subsequent reunions, are especially rich in manifestations of unification among dissidence. This paper will focus on these particular moments. The concept of looking at the essence of the Church exposes us to an understanding of what the Church is as a universal presence. Stating that the Church has no physical dimension, that it is a unique congregation abiding solely by an actual historic document or defined only by written doctrines does not show us its full essence. Likewise, seeing the Church as defined by how it differs from another, exists in objection to another church or how it avoids affiliation with others, reveals a body that does not have a unifying essence and is lifeless. Looking closer at its essence as it is revealed over time, shows us a living Church that has repeatedly manifested unification as its particularly unique identity. This paper is a reflective look of the Church through the ages which presents to us a look into the essence of the Church. Primary and secondary sources are critically examined with an emphasis on ontological manifestations. The moments in history that are presented in this paper are especially revealing of the unifying nature of the Church in various settings. This paper has limitations though. While the deliberate historic selections may give extraneous interpretations, it is intended to reveal previously under-estimated treasures, and this topic will require being given greater context in any expanded study.<br>Christian Spirituality, Church History and Missiology<br>D. Th. (Church History)

This chapter shows that the implications of the economic theory in the previous chapter are consistent with what happened to the Jewish people during the five centuries following the destruction of the Second Temple. An impressive body of evidence from both the Talmud and archaeological discoveries indicates that during the Talmudic period, Jews in the Land of Israel and Mesopotamia began obeying the religious obligation to educate their sons. Indeed, a larger and larger proportion of Jewish farmers sent their sons to the primary schools located in or near synagogues. As for conversions, many Jewish farmers converted to Christianity during the Talmud era. By embracing Christianity, Jews who converted still maintained their core belief in the existence of one God and the pillar of the Written Torah but were no longer obliged to obey the religious laws and tenets of Judaism, including the costly norm requiring fathers to educate their sons.

One can achieve somewhat of an understanding of how Sherlock Holmes came to exist by looking at the contributions of three people: Conan Doyle himself, Edgar Allan Poe, and Conan Doyle’s mentor in medical school, Dr. Joseph Bell. First we shall look at Conan Doyle, focusing on those aspects of his life that led to his writing of the Sherlock Holmes stories. Arthur Conan Doyle was born on May 22, 1859, in Edinburgh. His father, Charles Altamont Doyle, was English and his mother, Mary Foley, was Irish. His father had a drinking problem and was consequently less a factor in Conan Doyle’s upbringing than was his mother. Charles would eventually end up in a lunatic asylum (Stashower 1999, 24). Mary Doyle instilled in her son a love of reading (Symons 1979, 37; Miller 2008, 25) that would later lead him to conceive of Sherlock Holmes. Conan Doyle’s extensive reading had a great influence on the Sherlock Holmes stories (Edwards 1993). He was raised a Catholic and attended Jesuit schools at Hodder (1868–1870) and Stonyhurst (1870–1875), which he found to be quite harsh. Compassion and warmth were less favored than “the threat of corporal punishment and ritual humiliation” (Coren 1995, 15). Next he spent a year at Stella Matutina, a Jesuit college in Feldkirch, Austria (Miller 2008, 40). As Conan Doyle’s alcoholic father had little income, wealthy uncles paid for this education. By the end of his Catholic schooling, he is said to have rejected Christianity (Stashower 1999, 49). At the less strict Feldkirch school, his drift away from religion turned toward reason and science (Booth 1997, 60). At this time he also read the writings of Edgar Allan Poe, including his detective stories. So, although Sherlockians debate the “birthplace” of Holmes, a claim can be made that Holmes was conceived in Austria. In 1876, Conan Doyle began his medical studies at the highly respected University of Edinburgh. These years also played a large role in shaping the Holmes stories. One obvious factor was his continued exposure to science.