Academic literature on the topic 'Federal High Court'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Federal High Court.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Federal High Court"

1

Falase-Aluko, Abiola. "New Developments in the Admiralty Jurisdiction of the Federal High Court in Nigeria." Journal of African Law 39, no. 1 (1995): 64–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s002185530000588x.

Full text
Abstract:
Over 20 years ago, the Federal High Court was created. It is today the only Court with jurisdiction in matters relating to admiralty in Nigeria. This has, however, not been without some teething problems. Disputes arose over what matters fell within the admiralty jurisdiction of the courts and also as to which courts had admiralty jurisdiction. The recent Admiralty Jurisdiction Decree of 1991 addresses these issues by providing a comprehensive local code in line with the International Convention Relating to the Arrest of Sea-going Ships, 1952. This article traces the development of the admiralty jurisdiction of the Federal High Court and examines the scope of its jurisdiction today.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Bzdera, André. "Comparative Analysis of Federal High Courts: A Political Theory of Judicial Review." Canadian Journal of Political Science 26, no. 1 (1993): 3–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0008423900002420.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractConstitutionalists and political scientists often claim that federal high courts are neutral and impartial arbiters of federalism disputes. However, analysis of the political impact of nine federal high courts on the division of powers clearly indicates that such courts are best characterized as centralist and nationalist. This is largely the result of the strong institutional factors that link the federal high court to the political institutions of the central government, notably the process by which federal judges are appointed. The political theory of federalism must thus be modified to take into account the centralist function of judicial review.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Spaull, Andrew. "The State School Teachers Decision (High Court 1929) Revisited." Australian Journal of Education 31, no. 3 (1987): 236–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000494418703100302.

Full text
Abstract:
The State School Teachers decision of 1929 was recently overturned in the High Court (June 1986) thereby opening up the possibility for federal teachers organizations to obtain registration in the federal arbitration system, and eventually obtain one or more federal awards. The 1929 decision by the High Court of Australia was a significant decision in education and industrial relations, because it prevented state teachers and other public employees obtaining access to federal awards for the next 54 years. The decision, however, was veiled in unsettled legal argument, because the High Court overturned much of its expansive thinking of the 1918–25 period. Later generations of academic lawyers described the decision as a ‘bad one’ or ‘an anomalous decision’, but they and the current High Court failed to give any satisfactory explanation of why the Court had reached its decision. This paper offers such an explanation, arguing that the decision was not based on law (or the educational situation) but on the High Court's perceptions of the politics of federal-state relations in the period. The state teachers who had asked for a High Court ruling on the application of the Commonwealth's industrial relations powers (section 51 XXXV of the Constitution) to their work and employment were thus dragged momentarily onto the centre stage of Australian politics and law. They found themselves denied access to a federal award because the High Court felt that the federal arbitration ‘experiment’ had caused too much embarrassment to the federal system of government.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Kurtishi, Emir. "The Constitutional Court of the Federal Republic of Germany." SEEU Review 15, no. 2 (2020): 143–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/seeur-2020-0023.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Decisions made so far by the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany have always been characterized by their writing and content, even down to details, precision, accuracy, professional legal style of writing, always clear in the elaboration and adjudication of cases from its competence, but surprisingly, in our country, only a few have paid attention to the German Court in a scientific context, which can be seen from the only few materials we possess in the Albanian language. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of this Court, so that the comparative aspects can be made, highlighting its advantages and disadvantages, in case of dictating the state need for reform of the Constitutional Courts. Those who have institutionalized this constitutional institution know its value in the system of constitutional justice, which performs it in terms of protection of constitutions, its principles and value, and most importantly in the protection of freedoms and rights of human beings and citizens. The Federal Constitutional Court of Germany, to this date, has conveyed the efficiency of the protection of the German legal order, the serious approach and law interpretation, for the protection of freedoms and human rights, which ranks this court into a high level among all other powers in the German law system. The author, in the following paper, gives an overview of this Court starting with its history, organization and functioning, which today undoubtedly constitutes one of the most important constitutional courts in the world.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Madeira, Lígia Mori, and Leonardo Geliski. "O combate a crimes de corrupção pela Justiça Federal da Região Sul do Brasil." Revista de Administração Pública 53, no. 6 (2019): 987–1010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220180237.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract This article studies the operation of the Federal Regional Court of the 4th Region (TRF4) in the fight against corruption crimes. Judgments produced by the TRF4 criminal courts between 2003 and 2016 underwent text analysis using the dictionary method, seeking to outline the profile of crimes and defendants. Despite the changes in the web accountability institutions, with the outbreak of major federal police operations, technological uses, new legal devices and a high degree of concentration between the agencies, there is a small proportion of grand corruption crime, involving middle and high-ranking bureaucrats and more sophisticated crimes with greater financial value. Crimes involving contraband and petty corruption take up much of the day to day of the judiciary in the south region of the country, at least in the criminal intermediate courts, where the judge appeals decisions coming from specialized and generalist criminal courts.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Plowman, David, and Graham F. Smith. "Moulding Federal Arbitration: The Employers and the High Court 1903-1935–." Australian Journal of Management 11, no. 2 (1986): 203–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/031289628601100206.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Hearn, Mark. "Vitiating the Federal Principle: The High Court Work Choices Case, 2006." Labour History, no. 92 (2007): 129. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/27516192.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Hume, David, Andrew Lynch, and George Williams. "Heresy in the High Court? Federalism as a Constraint on Commonwealth Power." Federal Law Review 41, no. 1 (2013): 71–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.22145/flr.41.1.3.

Full text
Abstract:
Williams v Commonwealth of Australia is a landmark decision of the High Court on the scope of federal executive power in s 61 of the Constitution. The decision is also important for the interpretive methodology adopted by the Court. Notably, each judge based their understanding of s 61 upon federal readings of the Constitution. This methodology raises fresh questions about how the Constitution is to be interpreted, and whether Williams marks a break from orthodox understandings of that task. This article assesses the significance of Williams for constitutional interpretation in Australia, and whether it lays the foundation for a more robust protection of state interests by the High Court.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Paige, Mark A., and Audrey Amrein-Beardsley. "“Houston, We Have a Lawsuit”: A Cautionary Tale for the Implementation of Value-Added Models for High-Stakes Employment Decisions." Educational Researcher 49, no. 5 (2020): 350–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189x20923046.

Full text
Abstract:
Until recently, legal challenges to the use of value-added models (VAMs) in evaluation and teacher employment decisions in federal court had been unsuccessful. However, in May 2017 a federal court in Texas ruled that plaintiff-teachers established a viable federal constitutional claim to challenge the use of VAMs as a means for their termination in Houston Federation of Teachers v. Houston Independent School District. Houston represents a significant departure from prior federal court rulings that upheld the constitutionality of VAMs to terminate teachers on the basis of poor performance. The Houston court found that the districts’ refusals to release the underlying data of VAM ratings used to terminate those teachers violated the teachers’ procedural due process rights. By denying access to the code, teachers could not protect against the government’s making a mistaken deprivation of their property right to continued right to employment. The authors discuss Houston and its potential impact, limitations, and significance.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Zellmer, Sandra. "Waiving Federal Sovereign Immunity in Original Actions Between States." University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, no. 53.2 (2020): 447. http://dx.doi.org/10.36646/mjlr.53.2.waiving.

Full text
Abstract:
There are tremendous disparities between high stakes original actions between states before the U.S. Supreme Court, where there is no waiver of federal sovereign immunity, and other types of cases in the lower courts, where a plethora of immunity waivers allow states and other parties to seek relief from the federal government for Fifth Amendment takings, unlawful agency action, and tort claims. Federal actions or omissions are often at the heart of the dispute, and federal involvement may be crucial for purposes of providing an equitable remedy to the state parties, but there is no reliable mechanism for bringing the federal government to an original action before the Supreme Court. This Article shows how federal sovereign immunity stands in the way of comprehensive resolution of interstate water rights and highlights the need for reforms to facilitate meaningful participation by the United States. In particular, it investigates the merits of a waiver of federal sovereign immunity in original actions between the states. Although federal immunity is a staple of our nation’s jurisprudence, it has no constitutional basis and it serves little purpose in this context. The Article concludes that a congressional waiver of federal sovereign immunity would be appropriate and would have few downsides, at least in the case of original actions between states before the U.S. Supreme Court.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography