Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Female genital mutilation / Journal articles

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Female genital mutilation.

Journal articles on the topic 'Female genital mutilation'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 22 June 2024

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Female genital mutilation.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Minasari, Arofah, and Patricia Gita Pusparini. "The Role of UK Communities and Leadership in Tackling Female Genital Mutilation." Jurnal Ilmiah Muqoddimah : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik, dan Humaniora 8, no. 1 (January 16, 2024): 265. http://dx.doi.org/10.31604/jim.v8i1.2024.265-277.

Full text

Abstract:

Female Genital Mutilation is the act of removing part or all of a woman's external genitalia, including the act of injuring a woman's genitals without medical reasons. It is estimated that more than 200 million women have undergone Female Genital Mutilation procedures. This is an international problem and concern. The practice of Female Genital Mutilation in England emerged due to the arrival of immigrants who brought this culture. The efforts made by the British government in dealing with Female Genital Mutilation are by enforcing the law in the form of creating anti-Female Genital Mutilation laws and educating the public through campaigns and community empowerment. This research was created to try to see the role of British communities and leadership in dealing with Female Genital Mutilation using comparative feminist political theory and the concept of women's rights. This research will use a qualitative descriptive research methodology. The results of this research are in the form of political policy analysis using four approaches, namely gender; policy; and welfare states, state feminism, policy implementation and making, women's movements. As well as the emergence of obstacles in handling efforts which are influenced by various factors.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Elzeblawy Hassan, Hanan. "Female Genital Mutilation: Females' Intention in Northern Upper Egypt." Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences 7, no. 1 (February 27, 2023): 01–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.31579/2578-8965/144.

Full text

Abstract:

Background: Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting is an ancient cultural practice, predating the Bible and therefore the Koran, and has no basis in any religion. It is related to deep social and cultural ideas impeded in several societies regarding femininity and modesty because it is viewed as girls clean and delightful only after being genitally cut. FGM/C is additionally viewed as a protection of virginity, and it prevents premarital sex. Aim: The present study was carried find out to assess Females' Intention in Northern Upper Egypt regarding Female Genital Mutilation. Subject & Methods: A Descriptive Cross-sectional study was used. The study was conducted in family health centers (FHCs) in different sitting at Beni-Suef Governorate. A Convenient sample was used. А Structured Interviewing Questionnaire sheet which includes three sections: Socio-demographic data, Intention to practice FGM/C, and Causes for intention or not to practicing FGM/C. Results: The mean age of the studied participants was 22.6±5. Prevalence of Female Genital Mutilation is 71.4percentage, 29.7percentage of participants are suffering from complications after FGM. About 28.6percentage of females who had mutilated their daughters were planning to mutilate their other daughters in the future. More than one-third of females (35.5percentage) had an unfavorable attitude and 40.5percentage had poor levels of knowledge regarding FGM/C. 71.3percentage of females mentioned that the source of their information about FGM/C was their personal experience. Conclusion: Northern Upper Egyptian Females' Intention regarding intention of mutilating their daughters was significantly affected by demographic characteristics, level of knowledge, and level of attitude, source information, exposure to complications or pressure from family and neighbors. Recommendations: Alleviate females' intention toward Female Genital Mutilation should be improving their awareness regarding complications and Egyptian law against FGM, established by improve females' resistance toward family or neighbor regarding bad and harmful traditions.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Mouginot, Pierick, and Gabriele Uhl. "Females of a cannibalistic spider control mutilation of their genitalia by males." Behavioral Ecology 30, no. 6 (August 1, 2019): 1624–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arz127.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract When females can mate multiply, the interests of both sexes over female remating may not coincide, leading to selection for adaptations and counteradaptations in males and females. In several orb-weaving spiders, males damage external structures of the female genitalia during copulation, which hinders the female from remating. We investigated whether females have control over the mutilation of their genitalia in the orb-weaving spider Larinia jeskovi. We found that female sexual cannibalism during copulation reduced the number of insertions a male was able to perform and hence limited the probability of genital mutilation by the male. Genital mutilation did not differ between treatments in which females experienced different availabilities of other males before the mating trial: males absent, males near the female (“vicinity group”), and males in the female’s web (“web group”). However, traits of the mating male (size, condition) were significantly correlated with the occurrence of cannibalism during mating in “web” and “vicinity” treatments. These results suggest that females have control over mutilation by an early termination of mating, can respond to the availability of potential mates and can alter the probability of mutilation according to certain male traits. Female sexual cannibalism may represent a counteradaptation to genital mutilation allowing females to mate multiply.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Wayman, Sheri. "Female Genital Mutilation." American Journal of Nursing 100, no. 11 (November 2000): 15. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3522246.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

McCormick, Carol. "Female Genital Mutilation." Obstetrician & Gynaecologist 9, no. 4 (October 2007): 289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1576/toag.9.4.289.27369.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Ball, Teresa. "Female genital mutilation." Nursing Standard 23, no. 5 (October 8, 2008): 43–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.7748/ns2008.10.23.5.43.c6679.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Ball, Teresa. "Female genital mutilation." Nursing Standard 23, no. 5 (October 8, 2008): 43–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.7748/ns.23.5.43.s53.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Bede, Farah. "Female genital mutilation." InnovAiT: Education and inspiration for general practice 9, no. 7 (May 23, 2016): 395–403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1755738016643103.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Khaled, MA, and Charles Cox. "Female genital mutilation." Trauma 2, no. 2 (April 2000): 161–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/146040860000200208.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Sheldon, Sally. "Female Genital Mutilation." AVMA Medical & Legal Journal 4, no. 6 (November 1998): 189–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/135626229800400604.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Momoh, Comfort. "Female genital mutilation." Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 16, no. 6 (December 2004): 477–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001703-200412000-00007.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Sewell, Catherine Angela, and Harold E. Fox. "Female Genital Mutilation." Postgraduate Obstetrics & Gynecology 19, no. 8 (April 1999): 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00256406-199919080-00001.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Kelly, Elizabeth A., and Paula J. Adams Hillard. "Female Genital Mutilation." Postgraduate Obstetrics & Gynecology 25, no. 26 (December 2005): 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00256406-200512310-00001.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Winter, George F. "Female genital mutilation." British Journal of Midwifery 22, no. 4 (April 2014): 236. http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2014.22.4.236.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Khaled, M., and C. Cox. "Female genital mutilation." Trauma 2, no. 2 (April 1, 2000): 161–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/146040800675804007.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Wayman, Sheri. "FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION." American Journal of Nursing 100, no. 11 (November 2000): 15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000446-200011000-00011.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Meniru, G. I., M. O. Meniru, and U. O. Ezeh. "Female genital mutilation." BMJ 311, no. 7012 (October 21, 1995): 1088. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7012.1088.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Abdulcadir, Jasmine, Lucrezia Catania, Michelle Jane Hindin, Lale Say, Patrick Petignat, and Omar Abdulcadir. "Female Genital Mutilation." Obstetrics & Gynecology 128, no. 5 (November 2016): 958–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000001686.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Rymer, Janice. "Female genital mutilation." Lancet 368, no. 9535 (August 2006): 579. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69196-4.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

MacLeod, Tara Lee. "Female Genital Mutilation." Journal SOGC 17, no. 4 (April 1995): 333–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0849-5831(16)31334-9.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Cotton, Michael. "Female genital mutilation." Tropical Doctor 46, no. 1 (January 2016): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0049475515621648.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Fox, E. F., A. de Ruiter, and J. S. Bingham. "Female genital mutilation." International Journal of STD & AIDS 8, no. 10 (October 1, 1997): 599–601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/0956462971918779.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Rymer, J. "Female genital mutilation." Current Obstetrics & Gynaecology 13, no. 3 (June 2003): 185–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0957-5847(03)00004-0.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Sundby, Johanna. "Female genital mutilation." Lancet 362 (December 2003): s26—s27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(03)15064-7.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Council on Scientific Affairs. "Female genital mutilation." International Journal of Trauma Nursing 2, no. 2 (April 1996): 61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1075-4210(96)80015-0.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Rehnstrom, Jaana. "Female genital mutilation." American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 171, no. 4 (October 1994): 1160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(94)90058-2.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Lorensen, G. J. "Female genital mutilation." American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 172, no. 4 (April 1995): 1320–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(95)91503-6.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Ladjali, M., T. W. Rattray, and R. J. Walder. "Female genital mutilation." BMJ 307, no. 6902 (August 21, 1993): 460. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.307.6902.460.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Morgan, Melissa A. "Female genital mutilation." Journal of Legal Medicine 18, no. 1 (March 1997): 93–115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01947649709511028.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Dean, Erin. "Female genital mutilation." Nursing Standard 31, no. 52 (August 23, 2017): 15. http://dx.doi.org/10.7748/ns.31.52.15.s15.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Burke, Emily. "Female genital mutilation." Nurse Practitioner 36, no. 4 (April 2011): 45–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.npr.0000394994.41681.0c.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Lomas, Clare. "Female genital mutilation." Emergency Nurse 23, no. 9 (February 8, 2016): 15. http://dx.doi.org/10.7748/en.23.9.15.s22.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Bishop, Tina. "Female genital mutilation." Primary Health Care 25, no. 1 (January 30, 2015): 14. http://dx.doi.org/10.7748/phc.25.1.14.s16.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Bewley, S., S. Creighton, and C. Momoh. "Female genital mutilation." BMJ 340, jun02 2 (June 2, 2010): c2728. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c2728.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Morris, Nicholas H. "Female genital mutilation." Clinical Risk 14, no. 5 (September 2008): 189–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/cr.2008.080056.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Kelly, Elizabeth, and Paula J. Adams Hillard. "Female genital mutilation." Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 17, no. 5 (October 2005): 490–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.gco.0000183528.18728.57.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Black, J. A., and G. D. Debelle. "Female genital mutilation." BMJ 312, no. 7027 (February 10, 1996): 377–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7027.377b.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Cutner, Lawrence. "Female Genital Mutilation." Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey 40, no. 7 (July 1985): 437–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006254-198507000-00004.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Kaganas, Felicity. "Female Genital Mutilation." International Journal of Children's Rights 15, no. 2 (2007): 319–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/092755607x206533.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Isaacs, David. "Female genital mutilation." Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 52, no. 11 (November 2016): 1041. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpc.13389.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Roberton, N. R. "Female genital mutilation." Archives of Disease in Childhood 72, no. 1 (January 1, 1995): 98–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/adc.72.1.98-d.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Davis, Ronald M. "Female Genital Mutilation." JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 274, no. 21 (December 6, 1995): 1714. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.1995.03530210068033.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Young, J. S. "Female Genital Mutilation." JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 288, no. 9 (September 4, 2002): 1130—a—1130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.9.1130-a.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Young, Julie Suzumi. "Female Genital Mutilation." JAMA 288, no. 9 (September 4, 2002): 1130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.9.1130-jms0904-2-1.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Momoh, Comfort. "Female genital mutilation." Trends in Urology, Gynaecology & Sexual Health 15, no. 3 (June 8, 2010): 11–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tre.142.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Stephenson, Joan. "Female Genital Mutilation." JAMA 296, no. 3 (July 19, 2006): 272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.3.272-c.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Friedrich, M. J. "Female Genital Mutilation." JAMA 308, no. 7 (August 15, 2012): 662. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/2012.jama.10508.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Xu, Yiran, Gabriela Ross, and Carol Glowacki. "Female Genital Mutilation." Topics in Obstetrics & Gynecology 38, no. 10 (July 15, 2018): 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.pgo.0000538960.86563.fd.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Musse, Ladan Abdirashid. "Midwives' knowledge, education and training in providing care to women with female genital mutilation." British Journal of Midwifery 31, no. 5 (May 2, 2023): 278–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2023.31.5.278.

Full text

Abstract:

Background/Aims Around 200 million women have undergone some type of cut, change or removal of the outer part of their genitalia. Midwives play a central role in recognising and providing support to women who have suffered from female genital mutilation. The aim of this study was to understand midwives' role in supporting women with female genital mutilation by exploring their knowledge, education and training. Methods A systematic review of both qualitative and quantitative research published between 2010 and 2020 was carried out. A total of nine articles were selected, following screening and quality assessment, for inclusion in the review. Results Midwives' lack of knowledge and confidence regarding appropriate care for women with female genital mutilation highlights the urgent need for evidence-based research. Furthermore, midwives' knowledge and training needs to be improved to enhance care for women with female genital mutilation. Conclusions Female genital mutilation affects a variety of countries, and, in recent times, has developed into a global public health concern. Midwives play a crucial role in recognising and providing support to women who have experienced female genital mutilation.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Demir, Murat, and Veli Avcı. "An analysis of YouTube videos on female genital mutilation as a global issue." Yeni Üroloji Dergisi 17, no. 1 (February 21, 2022): 31–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.33719/yud.2022;17-1-991862.

Full text

Abstract:

Objective: Female genital mutilation is the removal of female genital organs for non-medical reasons, which is widely practiced worldwide. Female genital mutilation is a dark subject for the scientific world since it is often practiced in closed societies. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the role of YouTube videos in the prevention of female genital mutilation. Material and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, an internet search was conducted on YouTube.com on May 1, 2021, using the keywords «female genital mutilation» and «female circumcision» on a web browser with a clear cache and latest updates. Search results were evaluated in terms of the demographic characteristics of uploaders and the quality and reliability of the videos. Results: Most of the videos were shared by women. The videos shared by women and healthcare professionals were higher quality and more reliable compared to videos uploaded by men and religious personnel. Conclusion: YouTube.com videos may be beneficial for the prevention of female genital mutilation, but more attention should be paid to this issue, particularly by healthcare professionals, and more reliable videos with the higher quality should be shared. Keywords: Circumcision, female, genitalia.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!