Relevant bibliographies by topics / Feminist theories of international relations / Books
To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Feminist theories of international relations.

Books on the topic 'Feminist theories of international relations'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 18 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 books for your research on the topic 'Feminist theories of international relations.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse books on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

1951-, Kubik Wendee, ed. State theories: Classical, global, and feminist perspectives. 3rd ed. Halifax, N.S: Fernwood, 2000.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Burchill, Scott, Andrew Linklater, Richard Devetak, Jack Donnelly, Terry Nardin, Matthew Paterson, Christian Reus-Smit, and Jacqui True. Theories of International Relations. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-31136-8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Sullivan, Michael P. Theories of International Relations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230107335.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Burchill, Scott, Andrew Linklater, Richard Devetak, Matthew Paterson, and Jacqui True. Theories of International Relations. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24743-1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Andrew, Linklater, ed. Theories of international relations. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1996.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Chan, Stephen, and Cerwyn Moore. Theories of International Relations. 1 Oliver's Yard, 55 City Road, London EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446263655.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Sylvester, Christine. Feminist international relations: Critical concepts in international relations. Milton Park, Abingdon: Routledge, 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Zalewski, Marysia. Feminist theory and international relations. Norwich: Centre for Public Choice Studies, School of Economic and Social Studies, University of East Anglia, 1991.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Ackerly, Brooke A., Maria Stern, and Jacqui True, eds. Feminist Methodologies for International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511617690.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Michael, Nicholson. Formal theories in international relations. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press, 1989.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Clark, Ian, and Iver B. Neumann, eds. Classical Theories of International Relations. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27509-0.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Clark, Ian, and Iver B. Neumann, eds. Classical Theories of International Relations. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24779-0.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

1961-, Mayer Peter, and Rittberger Volker 1941-, eds. Theories of international regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

Feminist international relations: An unfinished journey. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Voskressenski, Alexei D. Non-Western Theories of International Relations. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33738-8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

Gabriel, Jürg Martin. Worldviews and theories of international relations. New York, N.Y: St. Martin's Press, 1994.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Gabriel, Jürg Martin. Worldviews and Theories of International Relations. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230390034.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

International politics: Concepts, theories and issues. New Delhi: SAGE Publications, 2012.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

International trade theories and the evolving international economy. London: Pinter, 1985.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

International trade theories and the evolving international economy. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1985.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

1948-, Sørensen Georg, ed. Introduction to international relations: Theories and approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

1948-, Sørensen Georg, ed. Introduction to international relations: Theories and approaches. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Jackson, Robert H. Introduction to international relations: Theories and approaches. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

1948-, Sørensen Georg, ed. Introduction to international relations: Theories and approaches. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Jackson, Robert H. Introduction to international relations: Theories and approaches. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

Richardson, J. L. Informal theories of rationality. Canberra: Research School of Pacific Studies, the Australian National University, 1990.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Globalizing care: Ethics, feminist theory, and international relations. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press, 1999.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

Conflict and cooperation: Evolving theories of international relations. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publishers, 1996.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

Knuttila, Murray, and Wendee Kubik. State Theories: Classical, Global and Feminist Perspectives. 3rd ed. Zed Books, 2001.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

Knuttila, Murray, and Wendee Kubik. State Theories: Classical, Global and Feminist Perspectives. 3rd ed. Zed Books, 2001.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Sylvester, Christine. Feminisms Troubling the Boundaries of International Relations. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.392.

Full text
Abstract:
A constant source of concern for feminists working in International Relations (IR) has been the field’s implied or stated boundaries. During the first ten years of its existence (roughly covering the years 1985–1995), the main goal of feminist IR was to challenge a caged-in knowledge realm that excluded more phenomena than it promised to seek. By the early twenty-first century, IR had devolved into a camp structure that was able to accommodate on the inside all manner of theories, people, and places. Yet while feminism contributed to troubled boundaries of IR, it did so against the backdrop of internal boundary dilemmas of inside and outside, good women/bad women, authentic versus dominant voice, gender versus feminism, and so on. Today, feminist IR is somewhat different from its earlier orientations. It now draws heavily on postmodern thinking about margins, multiple truths, subjugated identities and discourses, and power in general, and takes on IR theory and methodology using insights from postmodern thinking and other disciplines such as anthropology and geography. Feminist IR continues to bring new locations of the international and relations to the fore. Two such areas deal with the subject of violent women in international relations and the urgencies of development around the world.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

Maruska, Jennifer Heeg. Feminist Ontologies, Epistemologies, Methodologies, and Methods in International Relations. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.178.

Full text
Abstract:
Feminism operates on various feminist epistemologies, methodologies, and methods. While there is no consensus on how to organize or label these, there are a few generalities that can be drawn between these epistemologies, particularly in the international relations (IR) context. Classifying these epistemologies generally under the umbrella (or in the constellation) of postpositivism makes clear the contrasts between positivist social science and more critical approaches. Moreover, within the many critical approaches in feminist IR are many points of convergence and divergence. Feminist IR theory also focuses on the complexities of gender as a social and relational construction, in contrast to how nonfeminist ontologies focus on the rights of women, but including those of children and men as well. Hence, the postpositivist ontology takes on a more complex meaning. Rather than trying to uncover “how things really are,” postpositivists study how social realities (the Westphalian system, international migration or trafficking, or even modern war) came to be, and also how these realities came to be understood as norms, institutions, or social facts—often examining the gendered underpinnings of each. Most feminist IR theorists (and IR constructivists) share an “ontology of becoming” where the focus is on the intersubjective process of norm evolution.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

Sjoberg, Laura. Theories of War. Edited by Fionnuala Ní Aoláin, Naomi Cahn, Dina Francesca Haynes, and Nahla Valji. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199300983.013.2.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter addresses how different theories of war from the discipline of international relations (IR) neglect a gender analysis and explores why gender analysis is key to understanding war. The chapter illustrates how a gender analysis accounts for a more nuanced and empirically accurate understanding of what war involves, what its causes are, who fights wars, and how to end war. Traditional IR theory focuses on international systems (system level war theory), the state (state-level war theory), and individual leaders, while feminist scholarship goes further and recognizes the interdependence of the personal and the political. Feminist scholars account for the ways in which traditional security mechanisms might paradoxically make the women in these states less secure. Furthermore, the chapter points out that little attention has been paid to gender dynamics and how men and women are differently socially situated, which is important to understanding conflict among political groups, states, and international organizations.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

Agathangelou, Anna M., and Heather M. Turcotte. “Feminist” Theoretical Inquiries and “IR”. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.374.

Full text
Abstract:
Feminist international relations (IR) theories have long provided interventions and insights into the embedded asymmetrical gender relations of global politics, particularly in areas such as security, state-nationalism, rights–citizenship, and global political economies. Yet despite the histories of struggle to increase attention to gender analysis, and women in particular, within world politics, IR knowledge and practice continues to segregate gendered and feminist analyses as if they are outside its own formation. IR as a field, discipline, and site of contestation of power has been one of the last fields to open up to gender and feminist analyses. One reason for this is the link between social science and international institutions like the United Nations, and its dominant role in the formation of foreign policy. Raising the inferior status of feminism within IR, that is, making possible the mainstreaming of gender and feminism, will require multiple centers of power and multiple marginalities. However, these institutional struggles for recognition through exclusion may themselves perpetuate similar exploitative relationships of drawing boundaries around legitimate academic and other institutional orders. In engaging, listening and writing these struggles, it is important to recognize that feminisms, feminist IR, and IR are intimately linked through disciplinary struggles and larger geopolitical struggles of world affairs and thus necessitate knowledge terrains attentive to intersectional and oppositional gendered struggles (i.e., race, sexuality, nation, class, religion, and gender itself).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

O’Reilly, Maria. Feminism and the Politics of Difference. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.177.

Full text
Abstract:
Feminist scholars and practitioners have challenged—and sought to overcome—gendered forms of inequality, subordination, or oppression within a variety of political, economic, and social contexts. However, feminists have been embroiled in profound theoretical disagreements over a variety of issues, including the nature and significance of the relationship between culture and the production of gendered social life, as well as the implications of cultural location for women’s agency, feminist knowledge production, and the possibilities of building cross-cultural feminist coalitions and agendas. Many of the approaches that emerged in the “first” and “second waves” of feminist scholarship and activism were not able to effectively engage with questions of culture. Women of color and ethnicity, postcolonial feminists and poststructural feminists, in addition to the questions and debates raised by liberal feminists (and their critics) on the implications of multiculturalism for feminist goals, have produced scholarship that highlights issues of cultural difference, division, diversity, and differentiation. Their critiques of the “universalism” and “culture-blindness” of second wave theories and practices exposed the hegemonic and exclusionary tendencies of the feminist movement in the global North, and opened up the opportunity to develop intersectional analyses and feminist identity politics, thereby shifting issues of cultural diversity and difference from the margins to the center of international feminism. The debates on cultural difference, division, diversity, and differentiation have enriched feminist scholarship within the discipline of international relations, particularly after 9/11.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

Karns, Margaret P. Teaching International Organization. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.310.

Full text
Abstract:
The teaching of international organization (IO) poses unique challenges. One is deciding whether to take a broad global governance-IO approach dealing with the creation, revision, and enforcement of rules that mark different governance arrangements, the roles of formal, informal, intergovernmental, and nongovernmental IOs, and the politics, dynamics, and processes of problem-solving and governance in various issue areas, a theory-driven approach, or an IOs approach focusing primarily on select formal intergovernmental organizations (IGOs) and possibly nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), emphasizing structures, charters, mandates, and functions. Either choice could lead one to utilize recent literature on IGOs (and to a lesser extent NGOs) as organizations and bureaucracies, examining their design, functions, and performance or behavior. Another is the extent to which various international relations as well as IO-related theories such as theories of cooperation, regime and institution formation and evolution, functionalism, constructivism, and others are integrated into an IO course. To what extent are students introduced to currents of critical theory such as postmodernism, Marxism, feminism, and postcolonialism in relationship to IOs? There is also the question of which IGOs—global and/or regional—to include given the range of possibilities. How all the abovementioned issues are addressed will strongly influence choices with regard to textbooks, other readings, and various types of electronically available materials.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

Zalewski, Marysia. Feminist International Relations. Routledge, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203374580.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

Viveros Vigoya, Mara. Sex/Gender. Edited by Lisa Disch and Mary Hawkesworth. Oxford University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199328581.013.42.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter examines the construction of the modern concept of “gender” and its distinct uses and formulations in relation to the categories “sex” and “sexuality.” It presents the main debates within international feminism concerning gender as a theoretical and political project. In particular, the article explores diverse ways in which gender has been differentiated from or opposed to sex; the meanings that “gender difference” came to bear during the 1960s and the 1970s; the place that men and masculinities have occupied in theories of gender; the borders that separate and link gender with sex and sexuality; diverse feminist challenges to gender binarism, attempts to universalize gender, and the discursive coloniality of hegemonic feminisms; and, the contributions of the feminisms of the global South to contemporary gender studies.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

International Relations Theories. Oxford University Press, 2020.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

International Relations Theories. Oxford University Press, 2013.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

Dunne, Tim, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith, eds. International Relations Theories. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198707561.001.0001.

Full text
Abstract:
The fourth edition of this text provides coverage of international relations theories and arguments. The chapters explore the full spectrum of theoretical perspectives and debates, ranging from the historically dominant traditions of realism, liberalism and Marxism to postcolonialism and green theory. Each chapter is dedicated to a particular theory and features a case study that bridges theory and practice, and shows how theory can be used to explain real world political dilemmas. Spotlights on key books and articles encourage readers to go beyond the textbook and explore important works in the field, and new case study questions encourage analytical thinking and help readers understand the value of applying theory to concrete political problems.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

Dunne, Tim, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith, eds. International Relations Theories. 5th ed. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198814443.001.0001.

Full text
Abstract:
The fifth edition of this text provides coverage of international relations theories and arguments. The chapters explore the full spectrum of theoretical perspectives and debates, ranging from the historically dominant traditions of realism, liberalism, and Marxism to poststructuralism, green theory, and Global IR. Each chapter is dedicated to a particular theory and features a case study that bridges theory and practice, and shows how theory can be used to explain real-world political dilemmas. Spotlights on key books and articles encourage readers to go beyond the textbook and explore important works in the field, and new case study questions encourage analytical thinking and help readers understand the value of applying theory to concrete political problems.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

Theories of International Relations. Red Globe Press, 2013.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

Theories of International Relations. Taylor & Francis Group, 2014.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

1961-, Burchill Scott, ed. Theories of international relations. 4th ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

1961-, Burchill Scott, and Burchill Scott 1961-, eds. Theories of international relations. 2nd ed. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave, 2001.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

Sullivan, Michael P. Theories of International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, 2001.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

Theories of International Relations. Red Globe Press, 2013.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

1936-, Baldwin David A., ed. Theories of international relations. Farnham, England: Ashgate, 2008.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

Schieder, Siegfried, and Manuela Spindler. Theories of International Relations. Taylor & Francis Group, 2014.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the bibliographies on the topic 'Feminist theories of international relations' for other source types:
Journal articles Dissertations / Theses
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography