Journal articles on the topic 'Films fixes en éducation'

Este trabajo propone un análisis al respecto de los procesos de educación del cuerpo, específicamente en su vínculo con el desarrollo de la higiene escolar como ámbito de intervenciones educativas. Para ello fueron seleccionados unos documentos relativamente poco trabajados: los films fixes, en particular los films fixes contenidos en el Centre d’Etudes, de Documentation et de Recherches en Histoire de l’Education (CEDRHE), de la Facultad de Educación, en la Universidad de Montpellier. Resulta muy importante detenernos en el análisis de algunas particularidades que estas fuentes presentan; a partir de allí será posible proponer algunos elementos que contribuyan a la reflexión de cómo se produjeron algunas innovaciones tecnológicas en el ámbito educativo, en este caso, para el escenario educativo francés de mediados del siglo XX. Nociones centrales sobre cómo organizar la educación del cuerpo, sobre los cuidados del cuerpo y la higiene, y más en general sobre la vida, se mezclan con intereses económicos muy particulares, de actores que a priori podríamos entender como “ajenos” a las preocupaciones educativas.

The article discusses fifteen feature films which re-present aspects of European/Aboriginal relations. Through an analysis of the narrative structures of the films, three basic themes are identified and outlined, each of which could be implicated in the processes through which racist ideology inheres in the encoding/decoding nexus. The concept of ‘racial’ register is utilised to signify the limits to these forms of representations. It is argued that at both the levels of the narrative theme (intertextual) and the syntagmatic (intratextual), the ‘racial’ register works to reconstruct ‘race’ as an overdetermined ideological notion which cements ideas of essential difference and fixes them to ideas of place. The article concludes with an examination of three films which lie partially outside the ‘racial’ register.

Résumé L’idée de série est au coeur de la problématique de la prise de vues cinématographiques, puisque les « vues animées » sont constituées d’une série de photogrammes (obtenus grâce au procédé du tournage) et que les films sont constitués d’une série de plans (obtenus grâce à la procédure du montage). C’est même par un constant passage dialectique, de l’un au multiple puis du multiple à l’un, que la cinématographie aurait réussi à se développer comme dispositif. Cet article cherche les racines de ce phénomène jusque dans la constitution de la photographie et de la chronophotographie. On y explique comment le passage de la photographie à la chronophotographie est un saut d’ordre quantitatif (production de photographies en plus grand nombre), alors que le passage de cette dernière à la cinématographie relèverait plutôt d’un saut d’ordre qualitatif (plusieurs images fixes qui donnent naissance à une seule image animée). En cinématographie, le dispositif mis en branle permettrait ainsi d’accéder à un seuil d’un autre degré, à un autre ordre de représentation.

Abstract: In the 2016 winter term, I taught a course on French communication for English as a Second Language pre-service teachers (PST) in the Department of Education of a Canadian university. In this narrative autoethnography, I present the perspectives emerging from a university teaching experience of “teaching through film”, with undergraduate students enrolled in my French communication course. In-class discussions gravitated towards values and morals—notably empathy and caring—in relation to the significance of being or embodying a “good teacher”, following the viewing of Monsieur Lazhar (2011). Drawing on William Ayers’ philosophy of good teaching, among others, I present the implications of these discussions for teacher education and their significance for teacher training programs.Keywords: Film; Empathy; Artwork; Higher Education; Narrative AutoethnographyRésumé : J’ai donné, au cours de la session d’hiver 2016, un cours de communication française à des enseignants de formation initiale en anglais langue seconde, au sein du département d’éducation d’une université canadienne. Je présente donc dans cette auto-ethnographie narrative les diverses perspectives émanant d’une expérience pédagogique universitaire « d’enseignement par le film », auprès d’étudiants du premier cycle inscrits à mon cours de communication française. Les discussions en classe ont tourné autour des valeurs et des questions morales, notamment l’empathie et la sollicitude, relativement à la signification de ce qui fait un « bon enseignant », après avoir vu le film Monsieur Lazhar (2011). M’inspirant entre autre de la philosophie du bon enseignement de William Ayers (2011), j’aborde les implications de ces discussions au regard de la formation des enseignants et leur importance vis-à-vis des programmes de formation des enseignants.Mots-clés : film ; empathie ; œuvres d’art ; formation des enseignants ; auto-ethnographie narrative

Abstract: In the following paper, the authors analyze the prevalence of princess culture in the literature, film, and visual culture of young people. An art educator, art historian, and professor of English literature, the authors propose creative interventions through alternative resources and readings. Focusing on foundations of media studies and literature of Fairy-Tale Studies and girlhood studies, this interdisciplinary collaboration investigates complex creative predicaments of girlhood and princess media. Utilizing Princess Aurora and Sleeping Beauty as a case study and focal point, the authors discuss their collaborative arts research intended to explore problems and possibilities of princess culture. Keywords: Art Education; Arts Research; Fairy Tales; Media Studies, Princesses.Résumé : Les auteurs analysent la prévalence de la culture des princesses dans la littérature, les films et la culture visuelle des jeunes. Les auteures, une éducatrice artistique, une historienne et une professeure de littérature anglaise, proposent des actions créatives par le biais de ressources et lectures alternatives. Axée sur les fondements de l’étude des médias et sur la littérature liée à l’étude des contes de fées et de la jeunesse féminine, cette collaboration interdisciplinaire se penche sur les difficultés créatrices complexes des histoires de jeunesse féminine et de princesses. À partir d’une étude de cas de la princesse Aurora et de la Belle au bois dormant, les auteurs utilisent leur recherche artistique concertée pour analyser les problèmes et les possibilités de cette culture des princesses.Mots-clés : éducation artistique ; recherche artistique ; contes de fées ; étude des médias, princesses.

Musical culture plays an important role in the formation and development of the individual and is conceived as a space of dialogue, a space of spirituality. The media image of real reality formed in the media arises on the basis of the collectively developed semantic field of the presented information, which fixes the values of the perceiving audience in the process of their actualization. The mechanism of valuable media space functioning is available to relevant persons with their understanding of the cultural, political, social situation that recognizes the majority of the audience, individual vision of the leader (real or imaginary) elevated to the rank of Zeitgeist. The semblance of reality, a simulacrum is born when a real event in the consumer's mind is not comparable in scale to how it is presented in the media: complex life problems are simplified, overgrown with an imaginary value context, and the insolubility of contradictions is removed, offered in the form of a ready-made answer in an accessible package, thereby real reality is mythologized. An important place in the media space is occupied by modern musical discourse, which performs an informational and evaluative function based on the use of certain language means in music reviews, digests, essays, creative portraits of musicians, art chronicles, reports, music programs, documentary audio and video films, etc. Musical discourse in the modern media space is presented in three categories: professional, profane and mixed. The phenomena occurring in the modern media space, such as the growth of fan culture, the abundance of blogs, bloggers, etc., indicate the predominance of non-professional content over professional, the expansion of which requires solving new ethical, philosophical, educational and upbringing problems. Music programs broadcast by the Kultura channel: «Absolute Hearing» (presenter – Gennady Yanin, «Not dull Classics» (presenter – Sati Spivakova) etc., restore thesocial significance of art on the basis of respect for the creators and their work, revive the educational principles of domestic music-critical journalism, perform an important function of «service to music».

With the aim of understanding the insertion of higher education into a new context of organization of society and State, which is managed according to the New Public Management, this work presents a comparative historical study of the organization of French and Brazilian higher education. It is concluded that the French adherence to the New Public Management is based on the knowledge economy, while the Brazilian one is based on State size reduction along the lines of the Washington Consensus; in addition, higher education institutions in both countries are organized to participate in competitions: in France, the international competition promoted by rankings, and in Brazil, the market competition.ResumoCom o objetivo de compreender a inserção do ensino superior dentro de um novo contexto de organização da sociedade e do Estado, gerido pela Nova Gestão Pública, o trabalho apresenta um estudo histórico comparativo da organização do ensino superior brasileiro e o francês. Conclui-se que a adesão francesa à Nova Gestão Pública tem como norte a economia do conhecimento, e a brasileira, a redução do Estado nos moldes do Consenso de Washington; e que as instituições de ensino superior nos dois países são organizadas para participarem de concorrências: na França, a internacional promovida pelos ranqueamentos, no Brasil, a mercantil.Palavras-chave: Ensino superior brasileiro, Ensino superior francês, Nova gestão pública, Universidade.Keywords: Brazilian higher education, French higher education, New public management, University.ReferencesAEBISCHER, S. Réinventer l'école, réinventer l'administration. Une loi pédagogique et managériale au prisme de ses producteurs. Politix, n. 98, n.2 p. 57-83 2012/2.AERES. Repères historiques. Agence d’évaluation de la recherche et de l’enseignement supérieur. Disponível em: <www.aeres-evaluation.fr/Agence/Presentation/Reperes-historiques>. Acesso em: 17 nov. 2016.AMARAL, N. C. O vínculo avaliação-regulação-financiamento nas IES brasileiras: desafios para a gestão institucional. Revista Brasileira de Política e Administração da Educação, v.27, n.1 p. 95-108, jan./abr. 2011.ATTALI, J. Rapport Pour un modèle européen d’enseignement supérieur. Paris: Ministère de l'éducation nationale, de la recherche et de la technologie, 1998.AUST, Jérôme ; CRESPY, Cécile, Napoléon renversé ? Institutionnalisation des Pôles de recherche et d'enseignement supérieur et réforme du système académique français. Revue française de science politique : Paris 2009/5 (Vol. 59), p. 915-938.BARREYRO, G. B.; ROTHEN, J. C. Para uma história da avaliação da educação superior brasileira: análise dos documentos do PARU, CNRES, GERES e PAIUB. Avaliação. Campinas - Sorocaba/SP, v.13, n.1, p. 131-152, mar 2008.BARREYRO, G. B.; ROTHEN, J. C. O Nupes e a avaliação da educação superior: concepções, propostas e posicionamentos públicos. In: CATANI, A. M.; SILVA JR., J. R.; MENEGHEL, S. A cultura da universidade pública brasileira. São Paulo: Xamã, 2011.BARROSO, H. M.; FERNANDES, I. R. Mantenedoras educacionais privadas: Histórico, organização e situação jurídica. Rio de Janeiro: Observatório Univesitário, 2007.BEZES, P. Réinventer l’État: Les réformes de l’administration française (1962-2008). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2009.BOLTANSKI, L.; CHIAPELLO, È. Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme. Paris: Gallimar, 2011.BRESSER-PEREIRA, L. C. A crise da América Latina: consenso de Washington ou crise fiscal? Pesquisa e Planejamento Econômico. Brasília, v. 21. n.1, p. 3-23, abr 1991.BRESSER-PEREIRA, L. C. Plano Diretor da Reforma do Aparelho do Estado. Brasília. 1995.BRUNETIÈRE, J.-R. Les indicateurs de la loi organique relative aux lois de finances (LOLF): une occasion de débat démocratique? Revue française d'administration publique, v. 117 n. 1, p. 95-111, 2006/1.CALLON, M. Éléments pour une sociologie de la traduction la domestication des coquilles Saint-Jacques et des marins-pêcheurs dans la baie de Saint-Brieuc. L’année sociologique, v. n. 36, p. 170-208, 1986.CASTRO, A. M. D. A.; PEREIRA, R. L. D. A. Contratualização no ensino superior: um estudo à luz da Nova Gestão Pública. Acta Scientiarum. Maringá, v. 36, n. 2, p. 287-296. jul.- dez. 2014.CATANI, A. M.; HEY, A. P.; GILIOLI, R. D. S. P. PROUNI: democratização do acesso às Instituições de Ensino Superior? Educar. Curitiba, n. 28, p. 125-140, 2006.CDEFI, Conférence de Directeurs des Écoles Françaises. Les écoles Françaises d’ingénieurs: trois siècles d’histoire, sd. Disponível em: <www.cdefi.fr/files/files/Historique%20des%20%C3%A9coles%20fran%C3%A7aises%20d%27ing%C3%A9nieurs.pdf.>. Acesso em: 11 octobre 2016.CHARLE, C. Les Universités entre démocratie et élites de la IIIe à la V République. In: LEMIÈRE, J. L’université: situation actuelle. Paris: L’Harmattan, 2015.CHARLE, C.; VERGER, J. Histoire des universités: XIIe – XXIe siècle. Paris: PFU, 2012.CIP, Comité d’initiative et de propositions. Rapport des Etats Généraux de la recherche. Paris, 2004.CNPQ. A criação. Disponível em www.cnpq.br/web/guest/a-criacao/ acesso 10/10/2017CONVERT, B. ; GUGENHEIM, F. ; JACUBOWSKI, S.. La « professionnalisation » de l’université, trente ans avant la loi LRU : l’exemple de l’université de Lile. in Thierry Chevaillier et Christine Musselin (dir.), Réformes d’hier et réformes d’aujourd’hui : l’enseignement supérieur recomposé. Rennes : Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 2014. P. 61 – 80.CONSEIL EUROPEEN. Conseil Européen Lisbonne 23 et 24 mars 2000: conclusions de la présidence. Lisbone, p. 41. 2000.CROCHE, S. Qui pilote le processus de Bologne? Education et sociétés, v.18, n. 2, p. 203-217, 2006.CROCHE, S. Évolution d'un projet d'Europe sans Bruxelles: Le cas du processus de Bologne. Education et sociétés, v. 24, n. 2, p. 11-27, 2009.CUNHA, L. A. A universidade brasileira nos anos oitenta: sintomas de regressão institucional. Em aberto. Brasília, ano 8, n 43, p. 3-9, jul./set. 1989.CUNHA., L. A. A universidade temporã: o ensino superior da Colônia à Era de Vargas. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 1980.DÉCLARATION DE BOLOGNE. L’espace européen de l’enseignement supérieur. Bologne. 1999.DEROUET, J. L. Entre la récupération des savoirs critiques et la construction des standards du management libéral : bougés, glissements et déplacements dans la circulation des savoirs entre recherche, administration et politique en France de 1975 à 2005. Revue Française de Pédagogie, Paris, v. n. 154, p. 5-18, jan/fev 2006.DURHAM, E. Educação superior pública e privada. São Paulo: NUPES, 2003.ENQA. European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education. Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area. 3ed. Helsinki. 2009.EUR-LEX. Glossaire des synthèses: Méthode ouverte de coordination. Disponível em: <http://eur-lex.europa.eu/summary/glossary/open_method_coordination.html?locale=fr>. Acesso em: 21 out. 2017.EYRAUD, C.; MIRI, M. E.; PEREZ, P. Les enjeux de quantification dans la LOLF. Le cas de l'enseignement supérieur. Revue Française de Socio-Économie, 2011. p. 147-168. vol. 7, no. 1, p. 147-168, 2011,FÁVERO, M. D. L. D. A. A universidade brasileira: em busca de sua identidade. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1977.FIFA. Status de la FIFA. Zurich: FIFA, 2016.FRANCE. Loi relative à la création de l'Université, 10 mai 1806. Disponível em: <www.inrp.fr/edition-electronique/lodel/dictionnaire-ferdinand-buisson/document.php?id=3762 >. Acesso em: 07 jun. 2016.FRANCE. Loi relative à la constitution des universités. 10 Juillet 1896. Disponível em: <fr.wikisource.org/wiki/Loi_du_10_juillet_1896_relative_%C3%A0_la_constitution_des_universit%C3%A9s >. Acesso em: 06 out. 2016.FRANCE. Loi n.84-52 sur l’enseignement supérieur. 26 Janvier 1984. Disponível em: <www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000000692733>>. Acesso em: 13 ago. 2016.FRANÇE. Loi n°89-486 d'orientation sur l'éducation. 10 juillet 1989. Disponível em: <www.education.gouv.fr/cid101274/loi-d-orientation-sur-l-education-n-89-486-du-10-juillet-1989.html>. Acesso em: 17 nov 2016.FRANCE. Code de la recherche Modifications du code de la recherche prenant en compte le Projet de loi de programme pour la recherche. Texte définitif adopté le 4 avril 2006. 2006. Disponível em: <www.sg.cnrs.fr/daj/textes/reglementation/docs/code_recherche_consolide_0504.pdf >. Acesso em: 17 nov 2016.FURTADO, C. Formação econômica do Brasil. São Paulo: Nacional, 1972.GERMANO, J. W. Estado Militar e educação no Brasil: 1964-1965. 2ª. ed. São Paulo: Cortez, 1994.GOULARD, F. L’enseignement supérieur en France, état des lieux et propositions. La Documentation française. Paris: Ministère de l'enseignement supérieur et de la recherche, 2007.GUILLAUME, J. Université – Les universités de l’ancien régime. In: BUISSON, F. Nouveau dictionnaire de pédagogie et d’instruction primaire. 1911. Disponível em: <www.inrp.fr/edition-electronique/lodel/dictionnaire-ferdinand-buisson/document.php?id=3764>. Acesso em: 07 jun. 2016.JANET, M. Le Gouvernement des universités au Québec et en France : Conceptions de l’autonomie et mouvements vers un pilotage stratégique. In: CHEVAILLIER, T.; MUSSELIN, C. Réformes d’hier et réformes d’aujourd’hui, l’enseignement supérieur recomposé. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 2014. p. p. 21-49.LEHER, R. Projetos e modelos de autonomia e privatização das universidades públicas. Revista da ADUEL. Londrina, p. 7-20 set. 2003.LEITE, R. D. R. Análise do Conflito entre a Norma Constitucional (artigo 217) e Norma Internacional (artigo 61, Estatuto FIFA). 2008. Disponível em https://universidadedofutebol.com.br/analise-do-conflito-entre-a-norma-constitucional-artigo-217-e-norma-internacional-artigo-61-estatuto-fifa/ acesso em 20/10/2017MELLO, J. M. C. D. O capitalismo tardio: contribuição à revisão crítica da formação e desenvolvimento da economia brasileira. São Paulo: Brasiliense, 1998.MUSSELIN, C. La longe marche des universités françaises. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2001.NORMAND, R. The Changing Epistemic Governance of European Education: The fabrication of the Homo Academicus Europeanus, Cham (ZG)/Switzerland: Springer, 2016. 247 p.OGIEN, Al. « La valeur sociale du chiffre. La quantification de l'action publique entre performance et démocratie », Revue Française de Socio-Économie. Paris, 2010/1 (n° 5), p. 19-40.PAIN, A. Por uma universidade no Rio de Janeiro. In: SCHWARTZMAN, S. Universidades e Instituições Científicas no Rio de Janeiro. Brasília: CNPq, 1982.PECRESSE, V. Opération Campus: rénovation de 10 projets de campus. Communiqué - 6.02.2008. Disponível em: <www.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/cid20924/operation-campus-renovation-de-10-projets-de-campus.html>. Acesso em: 21 out. 2017.PICARD, J. F.; PRADOURA. La longue marche vers le CNRS (1901 – 1945). Cahiers pour l’histoire du CNRS (1988 - 1), 2009. Disponível em: <www.histcnrs.fr/pdf/cahiers-cnrs/picard-pradoura-88.pdf>. Acesso em: 21 out. 2017.PROST, A. Éducation société et politiques: une histoire de l’enseignement en France, de 1945 à nous jours. Sueil: Paris, 1992.RAMUNI, G. Le CNRS : principal enjeu de la politique scientifique. La revue pour l’histoire du CNRS, Paris, n. 1, nov. 1999. 1-21.RAVINET, P. La coordination européenne « à la bolognaise »: réflexions sur l'instrumentation de l'espace européen d'enseignement supérieur. Revue française de science politique, V. 61 n. 1, p. 23-49, 2011.ROMANELLI, O. D. O. História da educação no Brasil: 1930-1973. 3a. ed. Petrópolis/RJ: Vozes, 1982.ROTHEN, J. C. O vestibular do Provão. Avaliação. Campinas, v. 8 n 1, p. 27-37, 2003.ROTHEN, J. C. Funcionário intelectual do Estado: um estudo de epistemologia política do Conselho Federal de Educação. 2004. 270f. Tese (Doutorado em Educação) - Unimep. Piracicaba.ROTHEN, J. C. A universidade brasileira na Reforma Francisco Campos de 1931. Revista Brasileira de História da Educação, v. 17, p. 141-160, mai/out 2008.ROTHEN, J. C. et al. A divulgação da avaliação da educação na imprensa escrita: 1995-2010. Avaliação. Campinas: Sorocaba, v. 20, n. 3, p. 634-664, nov. 2015.SALEM, T. Do Centro D. Vital à Universidade Católica. In: SCHWARTZMA, S. Universidades e Instituições Científicas no Rio de Janeiro. Brasília: CNPq, 1982.SAMPAIO, H. O setor privado de ensino superior no Brasil: continuidades e transformações. Revista Ensino Superior Unicamp. Campinas, n. 4, p. 28-43, out. 2011.SARKOZY, Nicolas. Lettre de mission de M. Nicolas Sarkozy, Président de la République, adressée à Mme Valérie Pécresse, ministre de l'enseignement supérieur et de la recherche, sur les priorités en matière d'enseignement supérieur et de recherche, le 5 juillet 2007. Disponible en discours.vie-publique.fr/notices/077002458.html.SAVIANI, D. Ensino público e algumas falas sobre universidade. São Paulo: Cortez, 1984.SGUISSARDI, V. A avaliação defensiva no “modelo CAPES de avaliação” – É possível conciliar avaliação educativa com processos de regulação e controle do Estado? Perspectiva. Florianópolis, v. 24, n. 1, p. 49-88, jan/un. 2006a.SGUISSARDI, V. Universidade no Brasil: dos modelos clássicos aos modelos de ocasião? In: MOROSINI, M. A universidade no Brasil: concepções e modelos. Brasília: INEP, 2006b.SGUISSARDI, V. Estudo diagnóstico da política de expansão da (e acesso à) educação superior no Brasil. 2002-2012. OEI. Brasília, p. 191. 2014.SILVA JR., J. D. R.; KATO, F. B. G.; FERREIRA, L. R. O papel da CAPES e do CNPq após a reforma do Estado Brasileiro: Indução de pesquisa e da produção de conhecimento. In: ALMEIDA, M. D. L. P. D.; CATANI, A. M. Educação superior iberoamericana: uma análise para além das perspectivas mercadológicas da produção de conhecimento. Buenos Aires: CLACSO, 2015.VASCONCELLOS, M. Enseignement supérieur en France. Paris: La découverte, 2006.VIE PUBLIQUE. Les autorités administratives indépendantes, 2012. Disponível em: <http://www.vie-publique.fr/decouverte-institutions/institutions/administration/organisation/etat/aai/qu-est-ce-qu-autorite-administrative-independante-aai.html>. Acesso em: 21 out. 2017.

ABSTRACTA new tensile tester for thin films was developed to evaluate the reliability of the microelectro- mechanical devices. This tester uses the grip that fixes a thin film specimen to a probe by electrostatic force. We applied this tester for polycrystalline silicon (poly-Si) thin films prepared under various conditions. The microstructure of the film is controlled by the crystallizing temperature. The process conditions and the microstructures that contribute to the strength of poly-Si film are identified by the tensile strength and the fracture toughness. The mean tensile strength of each specimen size ranges from 1.8 to 3.7 GPa, and the fracture toughness calculated from the strength of the notched specimen ranges from 1.9 to 4.5 MN/m3/2. The 1000°C annealed film has higher strength and toughness than the other films because of the high annealing temperature and the small grain size. The contributions to the strength are evaluated by the additional annealing at 1000°C for the low temperature annealed films.

Bien que les discussions sur la possibilité d’une éducation en ligne à l’école primaire et secondaire au Brésil soient entrées dans le sillage du débat théorique, il existe encore une grande résistance. Cependant, le contexte de la pandémie n’a apporté aucune alternative, conduisant des milliers d’étudiants à l’isolement social pendant plus d’un an. Ce contexte a amené les enseignants du primaire et du secondaire à s’adapter aux nouvelles technologies, démontrant ainsi la nécessité de se préparer à travailler dans l’enseignement à distance. La question guide de ce matériel était la suivante: comment les enseignants en sciences de la vie peuvent-ils se préparer et quels outils de base devraient-ils connaître pour préparer leurs cours en ligne? Ainsi, l’objectif général était de réaliser des indications que les enseignants devraient connaître pour préparer leurs cours en ligne. La méthodologie adoptée a été exploratoire par le biais d’une revue de la littérature. Les principales indications étaient que les enseignants doivent rechercher un contenu diversifié dans la préparation des classes pour adopter des stratégies de motivation avec leurs élèves, en adoptant un soin avec la question de la langue, de l’audio et de la lumière dans la production des classes. Enfin, il appartiendra à l’enseignant de reconnaître les différents outils et ressources tels que : Youtube, Instagram, Films, Jeux, et autres subventions, afin qu’il y ait une approximation entre l’enseignement de la biologie et la réalité de l’élève.

Although some authors work at times with large flat dies and evaluate friction under more realistic conditions than usual, pressure is not totally controlled. In any case, cohesive friction does not appear to have been well studied in literature, but pressure and sliding velocity may provide useful information about preventing the cohesive phenomenon in sheet stamping processes. In this work, the coefficient of friction (COF) for DC-05 electrogalvanized steel is experimentally evaluated under lubrication regime by flat face dies. These tests are also considered to reproduce friction conditions in the die-sheet-blankholder system at some stages of the deep drawing process. High pressure condition in a flat friction system can also be considered for studying the friction behavior in the die radius. This work investigates the influence of contact pressure and sliding velocity of the sheet on the COF value. Adhesion tendency during sliding is also evaluated. Sheets were lubricated with a prelube type mineral oil and different lubricant film thicknesses are present on the sheet as a result of the draining off time effect, an aspect that will be evaluated later. Although sliding velocity has almost no influence on the COF value, pressure has an influence that may be expressed by a potential mathematical function. The COF value tends to be constant for high enough pressure values. This behavior may be explained, in part, from the viewpoint of zinc acting as a typical soft metallic lubricant. Sliding velocity is the most important variable from the adhesion phenomenon point of view, which appears more frequently for low velocity values. The draining off time, which some research works consider fixes the initial lubrication conditions in friction tests, has no significant effect when a mineral oil, typically used as a prelube, is selected as a lubricant. The authors found that pressure is the most important variable for the COF value. Velocity is the determining factor for the adhesion phenomenon in friction processes under mixed lubrication.

L’interculturalité —le contact entre acteurs sociaux de diverses provenances — a toujours existé. Selon le contexte, l’interculturalité peut être plus ou moins problématique (par exemple dans les situations de crise humanitaire liées à l’arrivée massive de réfugiés) et plus ou moins problématisée (par exemple dans les États qui reconnaissent l’existence de multiples communautés religieuses ou linguistiques). D’abord il est important de distinguer entre l’interculturalité et l’interculturalisme, l’idéologie pluraliste qui vise à renforcer l’harmonisation des relations en contexte pluriethnique (White 2018). Selon plusieurs observateurs, l’interculturalisme serait une réponse aux paradigmes dominants du multiculturalisme et de l’assimilationnisme (Wood et Landry 2008). Cependant, il est important de rappeler que l’interculturalisme n’est pas monolithique. Effectivement, les critiques de l’interculturalisme au Québec démontrent que cette idéologie n’a jamais fait l’objet de consensus (Rocher et White 2014). Dans un deuxième temps il faut constater qu’il y a plusieurs courants théoriques et philosophiques qui s’inspirent de la pensée interculturelle (Emongo 2014). L’anthropologie a gardé ses distances de ce vaste champ de savoir, mais peu d’anthropologues savent que l’anthropologie a eu beaucoup d’influence aux de?buts de la recherche sur la communication interculturelle, notamment à travers la personne de Edward T. Hall. Dans les anneés 1960 et 1970, le champ de la sociolinguistique interactionniste (inspiré en grande partie par les travaux de John J. Gumperz, 1989) a développé des modèles pour expliquer comment les écarts dans la communication en contexte pluriethnique contribuent à la discrimination des personnes immigrantes et des minorités racisées. Dans les années 1980, l’anthropologie américaine dite « postmoderne » a produit un certain nombre d’ethnographies « dialogiques » (White 2018), mais ces travaux ont été limités dans leur influence à l’échelle disicipinaire. Le virage phénoménologique en anthropologie dans les année 1990 a, quant à lui, permis une certaine réflexion autour de la notion d’intersubjectivité, mais l’anthropologie n’a jamais développé une théorie globale de la communication interculturelle, ce qui est surprenant étant donné que les fondements du savoir anthropologique se construisent à partir d’une série de rencontres entre cultures (White et Strohm 2014). La pensée interculturelle n’a jamais eu de véritable foyer disciplinaire, même si plusieurs disciplines ont développé des expertises sur l’analyse des dynamiques de la communication interculturelle (notamment communications, psychologie, éducation, gestion). Au sein des champs de recherche qui revendiquent une approche interculturelle, il y a un grande diversité d’approches, de concepts et de finalités. Gimenez (2018) propose une distinction entre l’utilisation de la pensée culturelle comme projet politique, comme méthode et comme cadre d’analyse. Il y a plusieurs éléments que l’on pourrait identifier avec une « épistémologie de l’interculturel » (Emongo 2014) et plusieurs thèmes qui reviennent fréquemment dans la littérature sur les dynamiques interculturelles, dont trois qui méritent une attention spéciale: la bidirectionnalité, les préjugés, les compétences. Au préalable, précisons qu’on ne peut pas réduire l’étude des dynamiques interculturelles à l’étude des immigrants ou de l’immigration. Pour des raisons évidentes, les contextes de migration transnationale soulèvent régulièrement des problématiques et des préoccupations interculturelles, par exemple sur le vivre-ensemble en contexte pluriethnique (Saillant 2016). Du point de vue interculturel, néanmoins, ce n’est pas la « culture » des groupes minoritaires qui devrait nous intéresser (puisque les groupes majoritaires sont « porteurs de culture » aussi), mais le contact entre personnes de différentes origines. Autrement dit, pour la recherche interculturelle, ce n’est pas la diversité qui est intéressante mais plutôt ce qui arrive en contexte de diversité. La notion de bi-directionnalité—c’est-à-dire l’influence mutuelle entre les groupes d’ici et d’ailleurs—permet de comprendre que mettre l’accent sur les groupes minoritaires ou personnes issues de l’immigration peut renforcer des préjugés à leur égard et que trop souvent les groupes majoritaires sous-estiment l’impact de leurs propres traditions sur le contact avec les personnes issues de l’immigration. La notion des préjugés est centrale à toute tentative d’expliquer les dynamiques interculturelles. Généralement compris comme des fausses idées sur les personnes d’autres groupes, les préjugés en situation interculturelle se rapprochent de formulations souvent rencontrées dans la théorie herméneutique. Selon Gadamer (1996) les préjugés ne sont pas négatifs en soi, puisque, en tant que pré-savoir, ils seraient à la base de la compréhension humaine. La pensée herméneutique permet de comprendre le lien entre préjugés et traditions et du coup de faire la distinction entre les traditions qui agissent comme forme d’autorité et celles qui permettent la transmission du savoir du groupe (White 2017). La pensée herméneutique part du principe que tous les êtres humains ont des préjugés et que les préjugés sont aussi une forme de savoir (parfois valide, parfois fausse). De ce point de vue les préjugés ne sont pas problématiques en soi, mais dans la mesure où ils peuvent être à a source d’incompréhension ou de discrimination (puisque non pas validés). Puisque les préjugés restent souvent dans l’ordre de l’implicite, le développement des compétences interculturelles consiste à rendre les préjugés implicites afin de réduire leur impact dans les différents contextes de la communication. Il existe une vaste littérature sur la notion des compétences en contexte interculturel, notamment dans les domaines qui s’intéressent à l’utilisation des outils interculturels pour faire de la médiation ou de la résolution des conflits. Pour tenir compte de la complexité des compétences interculturelles, il est important de définir les différentes catégories de compétences : savoir (des connaissances sur un sujet), savoir-faire (des connaissances sur les méthodes ou les façons de faire), savoir-être (les habilités sociales ou interpersonnelles). Dans la littérature sur le sujet, il y a souvent une confusion entre les compétences culturelles (c’est-à-dire l’ouverture aux différences culturelles et le savoir sur les différents groupes ethnoculturels) et les compétences interculturelles. Ces dernières doivent être comprises non pas comme un savoir sur l’autre mais plutôt comme des habilités de communication dans les contextes pluriethniques. Les approches qui se basent sur les compétences culturelles ont été critiquées parce qu’elles se limitent aux compétences par la sensibilisation de la différence et ne considèrent pas l’apprentissage de compétences communicationnelles (Gratton 2009). Les critiques des approches interculturelles sont nombreuses. Certaines partent de l’idée que la pensée interculturelle est fondée sur une fausse prémisse, celle qui présume l’existence d’entités culturelles fixes (Dervin 2011). Se basant sur les théories constructivistes, ces critiques montrent que l’identité culturelle est socialement construite et ne peut donc être réduite à une essence ou à des catégories figées. Plusieurs courants de la pensée interculturelle utilisent la notion de culture dans le sens large du terme (par exemple « culture professionnelle » ou « culture organisationnelle ») afin d’éviter les pièges de l’essentialisme, sans pour autant négliger le fait que l’utilisation de l’interculturel peut facilement tomber dans les généralisations et renforcer les stéréotypes sur les catégories culturelles. D’autres critiques de la pensée interculturelle réagissent au recours à l’utilisation ce cette notion dans le but de servir les besoins d’intégration des groupes dominants. De ce point de vue, l’interculturalisme serait une version « soft » de l’assimilationisme puisqu’il vise l’intégration des groupes minoritaires au sein d’un groupe majoritaire. Les critiques les plus radicales s’inspirent des approches orientées vers la lutte contre la discrimination (anti-racisme, droits humains). Selon cette perspective, le fait de parler des différences entre les personnes ou les groupes ne serait admissibleque dans la mesure où il permettrait de mettrela lumière sur l’impact de la discrimination sur les groupes vulnérables. Le simple fait de parler des différences entre les groupes peut, en effet, renforcer les stéréotypes et contribuer à la stigmatisation des groupes minoritaires. Cette critique nécessite plus de recherche et de réflexion puisque d’un point de vue interculturel, le fait de ne pas nommer les différences peut aussi renforcer la discrimination à l’égard des populations vulnérables.

IntroductionIt has been nearly half a century since the appearance of Susan Sontag’s landmark essay “The Imagination of Disaster.” The critic wrote of the public fascination with science fiction disaster films, claiming that, on the one hand “from a psychological point of view, the imagination of disaster does not greatly differ from one period in history to another [but, on the other hand] from a political and moral point of view, it does” (224). Even if Sontag is right about aspects of the imagination of disaster not changing, the types, frequency, and magnitude of disasters and their representation in media and popular culture suggest that dynamic conditions prevail on both counts. Disaster has become a significantly urban phenomenon, and highly publicised “worst case” scenarios such as Hurricane Katrina and the Haiti earthquake highlight multiple demographic, cultural, and environmental contexts for visualising cataclysm. The 1950s and 60s science fiction films that Sontag wrote about were filled with marauding aliens and freaks of disabused science. Since then, their visual and dramatic effects have been much enlarged by all kinds of disaster scenarios. Partly imagined, these scenarios have real-life counterparts with threats from terrorism and the war on terror, pan-epidemics, and global climate change. Sontag’s essay—like most, if not all of the films she mentions—overlooked the aftermath; that is, the rebuilding, following extra-terrestrial invasion. It ignored what was likely to happen when the monsters were gone. In contrast, the psychological as well as the practical, social, and economic aspects of reconstruction are integral to disaster discourse today. Writing about how architecture might creatively contribute to post-conflict (including war) and disaster recovery, for instance, Boano elaborates the psychological background for rebuilding, where the material destruction of dwellings and cities “carries a powerful symbolic erosion of security, social wellbeing and place attachment” (38); these are depicted as attributes of selfhood and identity that must be restored. Similarly, Hutchison and Bleiker (385) adopt a view evident in disaster studies, that disaster-struck communities experience “trauma” and require inspired responses that facilitate “healing and reconciliation” as well as material aid such as food, housing, and renewed infrastructure. This paper revisits Sontag’s “The Imagination of Disaster,” fifty years on in view of the changing face of disasters and their representation in film media, including more recent films. The paper then considers disaster recovery and outlines the difficult path that “creative industries” like architecture and urban planning must tread when promising a vision of rebuilding that provides for such intangible outcomes as “healing and reconciliation.” We find that hopes for the seemingly positive psychologically- and socially-recuperative outcomes accompanying the prospect of rebuilding risk a variety of generalisation akin to wish-fulfilment that Sontag finds in disaster films. The Psychology of Science Fiction and Disaster FilmsIn “The Imagination of Disaster,” written at or close to the height of the Cold War, Sontag ruminates on what America’s interest in, if not preoccupation with, science fiction films tell us about ourselves. Their popularity cannot be explained in terms of their entertainment value alone; or if it can, then why audiences found (and still find) such films entertaining is something that itself needs explanation.Depicted in media like photography and film, utopian and dystopian thought have at least one thing in common. Their visions of either perfected or socially alienated worlds are commonly prompted by criticism of the social/political status quo and point to its reform. For Sontag, science fiction films portrayed both people’s worst nightmares concerning disaster and catastrophe (e.g. the end of the world; chaos; enslavement; mutation), as well as their facile victories over the kinds of moral, political, and social dissolution the films imaginatively depicted. Sontag does not explicitly attribute such “happy endings” to wish-fulfilling phantasy and ego-protection. (“Phantasy” is to be distinguished from fantasy. It is a psychoanalytic term for states of mind, often symbolic in form, resulting from infantile wish-fulfilment, desires and instincts.) She does, however, describe the kinds of fears, existential concerns (like annihilation), and crises of meaning they are designed (purpose built) to allay. The fears are a product of the time—the down and dark side of technology (e.g. depersonalisation; ambivalence towards science, scientists, and technology) and changes wrought in our working and personal lives by urbanisation. In short, then as now, science fictions films were both expressions of deep and genuine worries and of the pressing need to inventively set them to rest.When Sontag claims that “the imagination of disaster does not greatly differ” (224) from one period to another, this is because, psychologically speaking, neither the precipitating concerns and fears (death, loss of love, meaninglessness, etc.), nor the ways in which people’s minds endeavour to assuage them, substantively differ. What is different is the way they are depicted. This is unsurprisingly a function of the political, social, and moral situations and milieus that provide the context in which the imagination of disaster unfolds. In contemporary society, the extent to which the media informs and constructs the context in which the imagination operates is unprecedented.Sontag claims that there is little if any criticism of the real social and political conditions that bring about the fears the films depict (223). Instead, fantasy operates so as to displace and project the actual causes away from their all too human origins into outer space and onto aliens. In a sense, this is the core and raison d’etre for such films. By their very nature, science fiction films of the kind Sontag is discussing cannot concern themselves with genuine social or political criticism (even though the films are necessarily expressive of such criticism). Any serious questioning of the moral and political status quo—conditions that are responsible for the disasters befalling people—would hamper the operation of fantasy and its production of temporarily satisfying “solutions” to whatever catastrophe is being depicted.Sontag goes on to discuss various strategies science fiction employs to deal with such fears. For example, through positing a bifurcation between good and evil, and grossly oversimplifying the moral complexity of situations, it allows one to “give outlet to cruel or at least amoral feelings” (215) and to exercise feelings of superiority—moral and otherwise. Ambiguous feelings towards science and technology are repressed. Quick and psychologically satisfying fixes are sought for these by means of phantasy and the imaginative construction of invulnerable heroes. Much of what Sontag says can straightforwardly be applied to catastrophe in general. “Alongside the hopeful fantasy of moral simplification and international unity embodied in the science fiction films lurk the deepest anxieties about contemporary existence” (220). Sontag writes:In the films it is by means of images and sounds […] that one can participate in the fantasy of living through one’s own death and more, the death of cities, the destruction of humanity itself. Science fiction films are not about science. They are about disaster, which is one of the oldest subjects in art. In science fiction films disaster is rarely viewed intensively; it is always extensive. It is a matter of quality and ingenuity […] the science fiction film […] is concerned with the aesthetics of disaster […] and it is in the imagery of destruction that the core of a good science fiction film lies. (212–13)In science fiction films, disaster, though widespread, is viewed intensively as well as extensively. The disturbances constitutive of the disaster are moral and emotional as well as material. People are left without the mental or physical abilities they need to cope. Government is absent or useless. We find ourselves in what amounts to what Naomi Zack (“Philosophy and Disaster”; Ethics for Disaster) describes as a Hobbesian second state of nature—where government is inoperative and chaos (moral, social, political, personal) reigns. Science fiction’s way out is to imaginatively construct scenarios emotionally satisfying enough to temporarily assuage the distress (anomie or chaos) experienced in the film.There is, however, a tremendous difference in the way in which people who face catastrophic occurrences in their lives, as opposed to science fiction, address the problems. For one thing, they must be far closer to complex and quickly changing realities and uncertain truths than are the phantastic, temporarily gratifying, and morally unproblematic resolutions to the catastrophic scenarios that science fiction envisions. Genuine catastrophe, for example war, undermines and dismantles the structures—material structures to be sure but also those of justice, human kindness, and affectivity—that give us the wherewithal to function and that are shown to be inimical to catastrophe as such. Disaster dispenses with civilization while catastrophe displaces it.Special Effects and Changing StorylinesScience fiction and disaster film genres have been shaped by developments in visual simulation technologies providing opportunities for imaginatively mixing fact and fiction. Developments in filmmaking include computer or digital techniques for reproducing on the screen what can otherwise only be imagined as causal sequences of events and spectacles accompanying the wholesale destruction of buildings and cities—even entire planets. Indeed films are routinely promoted on the basis of how cinematographers and technicians have advanced the state of the art. The revival of 3-D movies with films such as Avatar (2009) and Prometheus (2012) is one of a number of developments augmenting the panoramas of 1950s classics featuring “melting tanks, flying bodies, crashing walls, awesome craters and fissures in the earth, plummeting spacecraft [and] colourful deadly rays” (Sontag 213). An emphasis on the scale of destruction and the wholesale obliteration of recognisable sites emblematic of “the city” (mega-structures like the industrial plant in Aliens (1986) and vast space ships like the “Death Star” in two Star Wars sequels) connect older films with new ones and impress the viewer with ever more extraordinary spectacle.Films that have been remade make for useful comparison. On the whole, these reinforce the continuation and predictability of some storylines (for instance, threats of extra-terrestrial invasion), but also the attenuation or disappearance of other narrative elements such as the monsters and anxieties released by mid-twentieth century atomic tests (Broderick). Remakes also highlight emerging themes requiring novel or updated critical frameworks. For example, environmental anxieties, largely absent in 1950s science fiction films (except for narratives involving colliding worlds or alien contacts) have appeared en masse in recent years, providing an updated view on the ethical issues posed by the fall of cities and communities (Taylor, “Urban”).In The Invasion of the Bodysnatchers and its remakes (1956, 1978, 1993), for example, the organic and vegetal nature of the aliens draws the viewer’s attention to an environment formed by combative species, allowing for threats of infestation, growth and decay of the self and individuality—a longstanding theme. In the most recent version, The Invasion (2007), special effects and directorial spirit render the orifice-seeking tendrils of the pod creatures threateningly vigorous and disturbing (Lim). More sanctimonious than physically invasive, the aliens in the 1951 version of The Day the Earth Stood Still are fed up with humankind’s fixation with atomic self-destruction, and threaten global obliteration on the earth (Cox). In the 2008 remake, the suave alien ambassador, Keanu Reeves, targets the environmental negligence of humanity.Science, including science as fiction, enters into disaster narratives in a variety of ways. Some are less obvious but provocative nonetheless; for example, movies dramatising the arrival of aliens such as War of the Worlds (1953 and 2005) or Alien (1979). These more subtle approaches can be personally confronting even without the mutation of victims into vegetables or zombies. Special effects technologies have made it possible to illustrate the course of catastrophic floods and earthquakes in considerable scientific and visual detail and to represent the interaction of natural disasters, the built environment, and people, from the scale of buildings, homes, and domestic lives to entire cities and urban populations.For instance, the blockbuster film The Day After Tomorrow (2004) runs 118 minutes, but has an uncertain fictional time frame of either a few weeks or 72 hours (if the film’s title is to taken literally). The movie shows the world as we know it being mostly destroyed. Tokyo is shattered by hailstones and Los Angeles is twisted by cyclones the likes of which Dorothy would never have seen. New York disappears beneath a mountainous tsunami. All of these events result from global climate change, though whether this is due to human (in) action or other causes is uncertain. Like their predecessors, the new wave of disaster movies like The Day After Tomorrow makes for questionable “art” (Annan). Nevertheless, their reception opens a window onto broader political and moral contexts for present anxieties. Some critics have condemned The Day After Tomorrow for its scientific inaccuracies—questioning the scale or pace of climate change. Others acknowledge errors while commending efforts to raise environmental awareness (Monbiot). Coincident with the film and criticisms in both the scientific and political arena is a new class of environmental heretic—the climate change denier. This is a shadowy character commonly associated with the presidency of George W. Bush and the oil lobby that uses minor inconsistencies of science to claim that climate change does not exist. One thing underlying both twisting facts for the purposes of making science fiction films and ignoring evidence of climate change is an infantile orientation towards the unknown. In this regard, recent films do what science fiction disaster films have always done. While freely mixing truths and half-truths for the purpose of heightened dramatic effect, they fulfil psychological tasks such as orchestrating nightmare scenarios and all too easy victories on the screen. Uncertainty regarding the precise cause, scale, or duration of cataclysmic natural phenomena is mirrored by suspension of disbelief in the viability of some human responses to portrayals of urban disaster. Science fiction, in other words, invites us to accept as possible the flight of Americans and their values to Mexico (The Day After Tomorrow), the voyage into earth’s molten core (The Core 2003), or the disposal of lava in LA’s drainage system (Volcano 1997). Reinforcing Sontag’s point, here too there is a lack of criticism of the real social and political conditions that bring about the fears depicted in the films (223). Moreover, much like news coverage, images in recent natural disaster films (like their predecessors) typically finish at the point where survivors are obliged to pick up the pieces and start all over again—the latter is not regarded as newsworthy. Allowing for developments in science fiction films and the disaster genre, Sontag’s observation remains accurate. The films are primarily concerned “with the aesthetics of destruction, with the peculiar beauties to be found in wreaking havoc, in making a mess” (213) rather than rebuilding. The Imagination of Disaster RecoverySontag’s essay contributes to an important critical perspective on science fiction film. Variations on her “psychological point of view” have been explored. (The two discourses—psychology and cinema—have parallel and in some cases intertwined histories). Moreover, in the intervening years, psychological or psychoanalytical terms and narratives have themselves become even more a part of popular culture. They feature in recent disaster films and disaster recovery discourse in the “real” world.Today, with greater frequency than in the 1950s and 60s films arguably, representations of alien invasion or catastrophic global warming serve to background conflict resolutions of a more quotidian and personal nature. Hence, viewers are led to suspect that Tom Cruise will be more likely to survive the rapacious monsters in the latest The War of the Worlds if he can become less narcissistic and a better father. Similarly, Dennis Quaid’s character will be much better prepared to serve a newly glaciated America for having rescued his son (and marriage) from the watery deep-freezer that New York City becomes in The Day After Tomorrow. In these films the domestic and familial comprise a domain of inter-personal and communal relations from which victims and heroes appear. Currents of thought from the broad literature of disaster studies and Western media also call upon this domain. The imagination of disaster recovery has come to partly resemble a set of problems organised around the needs of traumatised communities. These serve as an object of urban governance, planning, and design conceived in different ways, but largely envisioned as an organic unity that connects urban populations, their pasts, and settings in a meaningful, psychologically significant manner (Furedi; Hutchison and Bleiker; Boano). Terms like “place” or concepts like Boano’s “place-attachment" (38) feature in this discourse to describe this unity and its subjective dimensions. Consider one example. In August 2006, one year after Katrina, the highly respected Journal of Architectural Education dedicated a special issue to New Orleans and its reconstruction. Opening comments by editorialist Barbara Allen include claims presupposing enduring links between the New Orleans community conceived as an organic whole, its architectural heritage imagined as a mnemonic vehicle, and the city’s unique setting. Though largely unsupported (and arguably unsupportable) the following proposition would find agreement across a number of disaster studies and resonates in commonplace reasoning:The culture of New Orleans is unique. It is a mix of ancient heritage with layers and adaptations added by successive generations, resulting in a singularly beautiful cultural mosaic of elements. Hurricane Katrina destroyed buildings—though not in the city’s historic core—and displaced hundreds of thousands of people, but it cannot wipe out the memories and spirit of the citizens. (4) What is intriguing about the claim is an underlying intellectual project that subsumes psychological and sociological domains of reasoning within a distinctive experience of community, place, and memory. In other words, the common belief that memory is an intrinsic part of the human condition of shock and loss gives form to a theory of how urban communities experience disaster and how they might re-build—and justify rebuilding—themselves. This is problematic and invites anachronistic thinking. While communities are believed to be formed partly by memories of a place, “memory” is neither a collective faculty nor is it geographically bounded. Whose memories are included and which ones are not? Are these truly memories of one place or do they also draw on other real or imagined places? Moreover—and this is where additional circumspection is inspired by our reading of Sontag’s essay—does Allen’s editorial contribute to an aestheticised image of place, rather than criticism of the social and political conditions required for reconstruction to proceed with justice, compassionately and affectively? Allowing for civil liberties to enter the picture, Allen adds “it is necessary to enable every citizen to come back to this exceptional city if they so desire” (4). However, given that memories of places and desires for their recovery are not univocal, and often contain competing visions of what was and should be, it is not surprising they should result in competing expectations for reconstruction efforts. This has clearly proven the case for New Orleans (Vederber; Taylor, “Typologies”)ConclusionThe comparison of films invites an extension of Sontag’s analysis of the imagination of disaster to include the psychology, politics, and morality of rebuilding. Can a “psychological point of view” help us to understand not only the motives behind capturing so many scenes of destruction on screen and television, but also something of the creative impulses driving reconstruction? This invites a second question. How do some impulses, particularly those caricatured as the essence of an “enterprise culture” (Heap and Ross) associated with America’s “can-do” or others valorised as positive outcomes of catastrophe in The Upside of Down (Homer-Dixon), highlight or possibly obscure criticism of the conditions which made cities like New Orleans vulnerable in the first place? The broad outline of an answer to the second question begins to appear only when consideration of the ethics of disaster and rebuilding are taken on board. If “the upside” of “the down” wrought by Hurricane Katrina, for example, is rebuilding of any kind, at any price, and for any person, then the equation works (i.e., there is a silver lining for every cloud). If, however, the range of positives is broadened to include issues of social justice, then the figures require more complex arithmetic.ReferencesAllen, Barbara. “New Orleans and Katrina: One Year Later.” Journal of Architectural Education 60.1 (2006): 4.Annan, David. Catastrophe: The End of the Cinema? London: Lorrimer, 1975.Boano, Camillo. “‘Violent Space’: Production and Reproduction of Security and Vulnerabilities.” The Journal of Architecture 16 (2011): 37–55.Broderick, Mick, ed. Hibakusha Cinema: Hiroshima, Nagasaki and the Nuclear Image in Japanese Film. London: Kegan Paul, 1996.Cox, David. “Get This, Aliens: We Just Don’t Care!” The Guardian 15 Dec. 2008 ‹http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/filmblog/2008/dec/15/the-day-the-earth-stood-still›. Furedi, Frank. “The Changing Meaning of Disaster.” Area 39.4 (2007): 482–89.Heap, Shaun H., and Angus Ross, eds. Understanding the Enterprise Culture: Themes in the Work of Mary Douglas. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1992. Homer-Dixon, Thomas. The Upside of Down: Catastrophe, Creativity and the Renewal of Civilization. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2006.Hutchison, Emma, and Roland Bleiker. “Emotional Reconciliation: Reconstituting Identity and Community after Trauma.” European Journal of Social Theory 11 (2008): 385–403.Lim, Dennis. “Same Old Aliens, But New Neuroses.” New York Times 12 Aug. 2007: A17.Monbiot, George. “A Hard Rain's A-gonna Fall.” The Guardian 14 May 2004.Sontag, Susan. “The Imagination of Disaster” (1965). Against Interpretation and Other Essays. New York: Dell, 1979. 209–25.Taylor, William M. “Typologies of Katrina: Mnemotechnics in Post-Disaster New Orleans.” Interstices 13 (2012): 71–84.———. “Urban Disasters: Visualising the Fall of Cities and the Forming of Human Values.” Journal of Architecture 11.5 (2006): 603–12.Verderber, Stephen. “Five Years After – Three New Orleans Neighborhoods.” Journal of Architectural Education 64.1 (2010): 107–20.Zack, Naomi. Ethics for Disaster. New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 2009.———. “Philosophy and Disaster.” Homeland Security Affairs 2, article 5 (April 2006): ‹http://www.hsaj.org/?article=2.1.5›.FilmographyAlien. Dir. Ridley Scott. Brandywine Productions, 1979.Aliens. Dir. James Cameron. Brandywine Productions, 1986.Avatar. Dir. James Cameron. Lightstorm Entertainment et al., 2009.The Core. Dir. Jon Amiel. Paramount Pictures, 2003.The Day after Tomorrow. Dir. Roland Emmerich. 20th Century Fox, 2004.The Invasion of the Body Snatchers. Dir. Don Siegel. Allied Artists, 1956; also 1978 and 1993.The Invasion. Dirs. Oliver Hirschbiegel and Jame McTeigue. Village Roadshow et al, 2007.Prometheus. Dir. Ridley Scott. Scott Free and Brandywine Productions, 2012Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope. Dir. George Lucas. Lucasfilm, 1977.Star Wars Episode VI: Return of the Jedi. Dir. George Lucas. Lucasfilm, 1983.Volcano. Dir. Mick Jackson. 20th Century Fox, 1997.War of the Worlds. Dir. George Pal. Paramount, 1953; also Steven Spielberg. Paramount, 2005.Acknowledgments The authors are grateful to Oenone Rooksby and Joely-Kym Sobott for their assistance and advice when preparing this article. It was also made possible in part by a grant from the Australian Research Council.

Michael Haneke’s film Caché tells the story of a bourgeois family in peril. The comfortable lives of the Laurents—husband Georges (Daniel Auteuil), wife Anne (Juliette Binoche), and teenage son Pierrot (Lester Makedonsky)—are disrupted when surveillance tapes of their home and private conversations are delivered to them anonymously. Ostensibly Caché sits in a familiar generic framework: the thriller narrative of a family under threat is reminiscent of films such as The Desperate Hours (1955), Cape Fear (1962), and Straw Dogs (1971). The weight of outside forces causes tension within the family dynamic and Georges spends much of the film playing detective (unravelling clues from the tapes and from his past). This framing draws us in; it is presumed that the mystery of the family’s harassment will finally be solved, and yet Haneke’s treatment of this material undermines viewer expectations. This paper examines the process of suspicious reading when applied to a film that encourages such a method, only to thwart the viewer’s attempts to come to a definitive meaning. I argue that Caché plays with generic expectations in order to critique the interpretive process, and consider what implications this has for suspicious readers. Caché positions us as detective. Throughout the film we follow Georges’s investigation to unravel the film’s central enigma: Who is sending the tapes? The answer to this, however, is never revealed. Instead viewers are left with more questions than answers; it seems that for every explanation there is a circumventing intricacy. This lack of narrative closure within the surface framework of a psychological thriller has proven fertile ground for critics, scholars, and home viewers alike as they painstakingly try to ascertain the elusive culprit. Character motives are scrutinised, performances are analysed, specific shots are dissected, and various theories have been canvassed. The viewer becomes ensnared in the hermeneutics of suspicion, a critical reading strategy that literary theorist Rita Felski has compared to the hard-boiled crime story, a scenario in which critic becomes detective, and text becomes criminal suspect to be “scrutinized, interrogated, and made to yield its hidden secrets” (224). Like Georges, the viewer becomes investigator, sifting through the available evidence in the vain hope that with scrupulous attention the film will surrender its mystery.Of course, Haneke is not unique in his withholding of a film’s enigma. David Lynch’s surreal neo-noir Lost Highway (1997) and Mulholland Drive (2001) have garnered a similar response and continue to be debated. Film scholar Mark Cousins compares Caché’s reception at Cannes to other landmark film and television examples:Where Dallas made people ask ‘who?’, Twin Peaks ‘what?’, the genre-bending films of the last decade ‘how?’ and The Crying Game was about the implications of the answer, Caché’s conversational buzz was more circular. Yes, we asked ‘who?’ Then, when it was clear this question was not answered by the film, we considered why it was not answered. (225–6)Felski’s meditation on the hermeneutics of suspicion touches on this issue, considering literary texts as preemptive of our mistrust. Extending Felski’s reasoning here as applicable to other forms of cultural expression, I would like to argue that Caché is a film that “matches and exceeds the critic’s own vigilance” for it is already involved in “subverting the self-evident, challenging the commonplace, [and] relentlessly questioning idées fixes and idées recus” (Felski 217). Caché challenges fixed and received ideas pertaining to audience expectations of the thriller film, subverting generic conventions that traditionally see the enigma resolved, the culprit apprehended, and order restored. More than simply refusing closure, Caché casts doubt on the very clues it offers up as evidence. Such a text performs “a meta-commentary on the traps of interpretation, a knowing anticipation and exposure of all possible hermeneutic blunders” (Felski 217). Throughout her essay, Felski highlights the lures and pitfalls of suspicious reading practices. Felski warns that attempts to gain mastery over texts by drawing to light purportedly obscured meanings are often as concerned with self-congratulatory demonstrations of skill in drawing hitherto unmade connections as they are with the texts themselves (230). While I do not wish to endorse suspicious reading as an unproblematic approach, the present paper considers what happens when readers encounter a text that seemingly cannot be approached in any other way. Unlike the realist literary narratives and mystery stories drawn on by Felski, Caché resists a manifest meaning in both form and content, making it nearly impossible for viewers not to search for latent meaning.So where are suspicious readers left when the texts interrogated refuse to bend to the demands placed on them? This is the question I will be examining in the remainder of this paper through the questions Caché poses and the care it takes in ensuring its enigmatic quality. I will proceed by breaking down what I believe to be the three possible avenues of response—Caché as impossible puzzle, inconclusive puzzle, or wrong puzzle—and their implications.I The Impossible Puzzle Caché opens with a static frame long take of a Parisian residential street. This could be mistaken for a still image until a pedestrian bustles past. A woman leaves her house centre frame. A cyclist turns the corner. “Well?” a male voice intones. “Nothing,” a female replies. The voices come from off-screen, and soon after the image is interrupted by fast forward lines, revealing that what we have been watching is not an image of the present moment but a video cassette of time already elapsed; the voices belong to our protagonists, Georges and Anne, commenting on its content and manipulating its playback. From the opening moments it becomes clear that we cannot be certain of what we are seeing or when we are seeing it.This presents an intriguing tension between form and content that complicates our attempts to gather evidence. Haneke pares back style in a manner reminiscent of the films of Robert Bresson or the work of the Italian neo-realists. Caché’s long takes, naturalistic lighting, and emphasis on the everyday suggest a realist aesthetic; the viewer can invest faith in these images because they ascribe to a familiar paradigm, one in which artifice is apparently minimal. This notion that a realist aesthetic equates to straightforward images is at odds, however, with both the thriller narrative (in which solutions must be concealed before they can be uncovered) and Haneke’s constant undermining of the ontology of the image; throughout the film, viewers will be disoriented by Haneke’s manipulation of time and space with unclear or retroactive distinctions between past, present, video, dream, memory, and reality.An additional contention might be the seemingly impossible placement of the hidden camera. In the same tape, Georges leaves the house and walks towards the camera, unaware of it. The shot indicates the camera must be elevated in the street, and at one point it appears that Georges is looking right at it. A later recording takes place in the apartment of Georges’s suspect, Majid. Viewers are given ample opportunity to scour the mise en scène to find what apparently is not there. Perhaps the camera is just too well hidden. But if this is not the case and we can neither locate nor conceive of the camera’s placement because it simply cannot be there, this would seem to break the rules of the game. If we are to formulate theories as to the culprit at large, what good is our evidence if it is unreliable? Viewers could stop here and conclude that a puzzle without a solution amounts to a film without a point. “Well?” Georges asks in the film’s opening. “Nothing,” Anne replies. Case closed. Short of giving up on a solution, one might conclude (as Antoine Doinel has) that those looking within the film for a perpetrator are looking in the wrong place. When the motives or opportunities of on-screen characters do not add up, perhaps it is Haneke one should turn to. Those familiar with Haneke’s earlier film Funny Games (1997) will know he is not afraid to break the tacit rules by which we suspend our disbelief if there is a point to be made. Film scholar David Sorfa concludes it is in fact the audience who send the tapes; Caché’s narrative is fuelled by the desire of viewers who want to see a film (102). Tempting though these solutions might be (Georges does not see the camera because he is a fictional character in a film unaware of its creator), as critic Roger Ebert has pointed out, such theories render both the film’s content, and any analysis of it, without purpose: It introduces a wild card. It essentially means that no analysis of the film is relevant, because nothing need make sense and no character actions need be significant. Therefore, the film would have the appearance of a whodunit but with no who and no dunnit. (“Caché: A Riddle”)The Caché as impossible puzzle avenue leaves the suspicious reader without reason to engage. If there can be no reward for our efforts, we are left without incentive. Alternately, if we conclude that Haneke is but the puppet master sadistically toying with his characters, we are left at a similar juncture; our critical enquiry has all the consequence of the trite “but it was all a dream…” scenario. “Well?” “Nothing.” I suspect there is more to Caché than that. A film so explicit in its stimulation of suspicious reading seems to merit our engagement. However, this is not to say that our attention will be satisfied with the neatly tied up solution we might expect. II The Inconclusive Puzzle When, one evening, Pierrot does not come home as expected, Georges and Anne conclude the boy has been kidnapped. They interpret their son’s absence as an escalation in the “campaign of terror” that had hitherto consisted of surveillance videos, odd phone calls, and childlike but portent drawings. With police assistance, Georges goes to confront his suspect, Majid. An Algerian boy from his childhood, now middle aged and disadvantaged because of lies Georges told as a child, Majid has already (quite convincingly) denied any knowledge of the tapes. At the door they meet Majid’s son who is equally perplexed at the accusation of kidnapping. The pair are arrested and an exhausted Georges returns home to explain the situation to his wife:Georges: So now they’re both in the cage for the night.Anne: And then?Georges: Then they’ll let them go. If there’s no proof, they have to. There’s suspicion, nothing more.The next day a sullen Pierrot returns home, having stayed the night at a friend’s without notifying his parents. His clear disdain for his mother is revealed as he rejects her affection and accuses her of having an affair. Pierrot likewise treats his father with disinterest, raising viewer suspicion that he might have a motive for tormenting his parents with the videotapes. Pierrot is just one cog in the family’s internal mechanism of suspicion, however. Whether or not Anne is actually having an affair can only be speculated; she denies it, but other scenes open the way to our suspicion. Anne is rightly suspicious of Georges’s reluctance to be open about his past as his proclivity to lie is gradually revealed. In short, Haneke deliberately layers the film with complexity and ambiguity; numerous characters could be implicated, and many questions are raised but few are answered.This suggests that suspicious readers might have recourse to Haneke as author of the text. Haneke, however, celebrates Caché’s ambiguity and his decision to leave the film open: “The truth is always hidden…that’s how it is in the real world. We never, ever know what the truth is. There are a thousand versions of the truth. It depends on your point of view” (Haneke). In interview, Haneke’s language also raises suspicion. At times he speaks knowingly (refusing to reveal important dialogue that occurs in the film’s final shot—an extreme long shot, the characters too distant to be heard), and at other times he seems as uncertain as his viewers (commenting on Anne’s denial of an affair, Haneke remarks “I believe her because she plays it very seriously. But you never know”) (Haneke).Despite this reluctance to offer explanations, Haneke’s status as an auteur with recurring concerns and an ever-developing vision prompts suspicious readers to evaluate Caché in light of his greater oeuvre. Those suspecting Pierrot of wanting to punish his parents might find their theory bolstered by Benny’s Video (1992), Haneke’s film about a teenage boy who murders a friend and then turns in his parents to the police for helping him cover it up. Furthermore, Das Weiße Band (The White Ribbon, 2009) is set in a small German village on the eve of World War One and the narrative strongly suggests the town’s children are responsible for a series of malicious crimes. Whilst malign children in Haneke’s other works cannot explain Caché’s mystery, his oeuvre provides a greater context in which to consider the film, and regenerates discussion as viewers look for patterns in the subject matter Haneke chooses to explore. Regarding Caché as an inconclusive puzzle shifts the emphasis from a neatly packaged solution to a renewable process of discovery. To suggest that there is an answer to be found in the text, a culprit who escapes apprehension but is at least present to be caught, gives suspicious readers cause to engage and re-engage. It is to assume that the film is not without a point. Close attention may reward us with meaningful nuances that colour our interpretation. Haneke’s obsessive attention to detail also seems to suggest that nothing on screen is accidental or arbitrary, that our concentration is warranted, and that active viewing is a necessity even if our expectations and desires for closure may not be granted.Caché ends without revealing its secret. Georges’s suspect Majid has committed suicide (perhaps due to the trauma dredged up by Georges’s accusations), Majid’s son has confronted Georges at his work place (“I wondered how it feels, a man’s life on your conscience?”), and Georges has refused any responsibility for his actions in the distant and recent past. Of the film’s conclusion, cinema theorist Martine Beugnet writes:In the end […] we watch him draw the curtains, take a sleeping pill and go to bed: an emphatic way of signifying the closure of an episode, the return to normality—the conclusion of the film. Yet the images ‘refuse’ to comply: behind the closing credits, the questioning gaze not only persists but affirms its capacity to reinvent itself. (230)The images Beugnet is referring to are the two final shots, which are both static long takes. The first is an extreme long shot, taken from the darkness of a barn into the bright courtyard of the family estate of Georges’s childhood. A child (Majid) is forcibly removed from the home and taken away in a car (presumably to an orphanage due to the lies told by a jealous Georges). This shot is followed by the film’s closing shot, another extreme long shot, this time of the front steps of Pierrot’s school. The frame is cluttered with children and parents, and our eyes are not directed anywhere in particular. Some viewers will notice Pierrot chatting with Majid’s son (a potentially revealing conversation that cannot be heard), others will not see the two young men hidden in the crowd. Eventually the credits roll over this image.Georges’s attempts to shut out the world seem undermined by these images, as Beugnet writes they “‘refuse’ to comply” to this notion of conclusion. Instead of bringing closure to the narrative, they raise more questions. What and when are they? One cannot be sure. The first shot may be a dream or a memory; its placement after a shot of Georges going to bed might encourage us to connect the two. The second shot at the school could be more surveillance footage, or possibly another dream. It might imply the boys have conspired together. It might imply Majid’s son is confronting Pierrot with information about his father. It could be interpreted as the end of the narrative, but it could also be the beginning. Some read it as threatening, others as hopeful. It might imply so many things. However, this “questioning gaze” that persists and reinvents itself is not just the gaze of the film. It is also the gaze of the suspicious reader. From the initial hype upon the film’s Cannes release in 2005, to the various theories circulating in online forums, to Ebert’s scrupulous re-evaluation of the film’s enigma in 2010, to the ever developing body of scholarly work on Haneke’s films, it seems Caché’s mileage for suspicious readers is still running strong, not least because “whodunit?” may be the wrong question.III The Wrong PuzzleOliver C. Speck has remarked that Caché is “Haneke’s most accessible film, but also the most densely layered,” leading the viewer “on a search for clues that always ends in frustration” (97). For Ebert, the film’s lack of resolution leaves the viewer “feeling as the characters feel, uneasy, violated, spied upon, surrounded by faceless observers” (“Caché”). Cousins likewise comments on the process Caché instigates: The film structures our experience in a generically gripping way but then the structure melts away at the moment when it should most cohere, requiring us to look back along its length (the structure’s length and the film’s) to work out where we went wrong. But we did not go wrong. We went where we were told to go, we took the hand of the narrative that, in the final stages, slipped away, leaving us without co-ordinates. (226)The "whodunit” of Caché cannot be definitively proven. Ultimately, viewers can have suspicion, nothing more. So where are we left as suspicious readers when texts such as Caché surpass our own critical vigilance? We can throw in the towel and claim that an impossible puzzle does not deserve our efforts. We can accept that the text has out-played us; it is an inconclusive but compelling puzzle that does not provide enough links in the hermeneutic chain for us to find the closure we seek. Alternately, when the answer is not forthcoming, we can hypothesise that perhaps we have been asking the wrong question; whodunit is beside the point, simply a Hitchcockian MacGuffin (the object or objective that the protagonists seek) introduced to bait us into confronting much more important questions. Perhaps instead we should be asking what Caché can tell us about colonial histories, guilt, vision, or the ontology of cinema itself.This is the avenue many scholars have taken, and the avenue Haneke (rather than his film necessarily) would have us take. The “who did what, when, why, and how” might be regarded as beside the point. In an interview with Andrew O’Hehir, Haneke is quoted:These superficial questions are the glue that holds the spectator in place, and they allow me to raise underlying questions that they have to grapple with. It’s relatively unimportant who sent the tapes, but by engaging with that the viewer must engage questions that are far less banal.Catherine Wheatley agrees, arguing Caché’s open ending renders the epistemological questions of the guilty party and their motives irrelevant, giving preference to questions raised by how this chain of events affect Georges, and by extension the viewer (163–4). By refusing to divulge its secrets, Caché both incites and critiques the interpretive process, encouraging us to take up the role of detective only to anticipate and exceed our investigative efforts. Caché’s subversion of the self-evident is as much a means to launch its thriller narrative as it is a way of calling into question our very understanding of what “self-evident” means. Where Felski describes suspicious interpretations of realist texts (those that attempt to unmask the ideologies concealed behind an illusion of transparency and totality), from its opening moments, Caché is already and constantly unmasking itself. The film’s resistance of a superficial reading seems to make suspicious interpretation inevitable. Wherever viewer suspicion is directed, however, it relies on engagement. Without reason to engage, viewers are left with an impossible puzzle where critical involvement and attention is of no consequence. “Who is sending the tapes?” may be an unimportant or unanswerable question, but it must always be a valid one. It is this query that incites and fuels the interpretive process. As there can only ever be suspicion, nothing more, perhaps it is the question rather than “the answer” that is of utmost significance.Works CitedBeugnet, Martine. “Blind Spot.” Screen 48.2 (2007): 227–31.Benny’s Video. Dir. Michael Haneke. Madman, 1992.Caché (Hidden). Dir. Michael Haneke. Sony Pictures Classics, 2005. Cape Fear. Dir. J. Lee Thompson. Universal, 1962.Cousins, Mark. “After the End: Word of Mouth and Caché.” Screen 48.2 (2007): 223–6.Desperate Hours, The. Dir. William Wyler. Paramount, 1955.Doinel, Antoine. “(Un)hidden Camera: The ‘Real’ Sender of the Tapes.” Mubi.com. Mubi. n.d. 10 Apr. 2011. ‹http://mubi.com/topics/461›. Ebert, Roger. “Caché.” Roger Ebert.com. Chicago Sun-Times. 13 Jan. 2006. 25 Feb. 2011. ‹http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060112/REVIEWS/51220007›.---. “Caché: A Riddle, Wrapped in a Mystery, Inside an Enigma [Response to Readers].” Roger Ebert’s Journal. Chicago Sun-Times. 18 Jan. 2010. 2 Apr. 2011. ‹http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2010/01/a_riddle_wrapped_in_a_mystery.html›.Felski, Rita. “Suspicious Minds.” Poetics Today 32.2 (2011): 215–34.Funny Games. Dir. Michael Haneke. Madman, 1997.Haneke, Michael. “Hidden: Interview with Michael Haneke by Serge Toubiana.” DVD Special Features. Hidden (Caché). Dir. Michael Haneke. Madman, 2005.Lost Highway. Dir. David Lynch. Universal, 1997.Mulholland Drive. Dir. David Lynch. Reel, 2001.O’Hehir, Andrew. “Michael Haneke’s ‘White Ribbon.’” Salon.com. Salon. 2 Jan. 2010. 2 Apr. 2011. ‹http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/andrew_ohehir/2010/01/02/haneke›.Sorfa, David. “Uneasy Domesticity in the Films of Michael Haneke.” Studies in European Cinema 3.2 (2006): 93–104.Speck, Oliver C. Funny Frames: The Filmic Concepts of Michael Haneke. New York: Continuum, 2010.Straw Dogs. Dir. Sam Peckinpah. MRA, 1971.Wheatley, Catherine. Michael Haneke’s Cinema: The Ethic of the Image. New York: Berghahn Books, 2009.White Ribbon, The (Das Weiße Band). Dir. Michael Haneke. Artificial Eye, 2009.

In the middle of the nineteenth century, Marcus Clarke famously described the Australian outback as displaying a “Weird Melancholy” (qtd. in Gelder 116). The strange sights, sounds, and experiences of Australia’s rural locations made them ripe for the development of the European genre of the Gothic in a new location, a mutation which has continued over the past two centuries. But what does it mean for Australia’s Gothic landscapes to be associated with the affective qualities of the melancholy? And more particularly, how and why does this Gothic effect (and affect) appear in the most accessible Gothic media of the twenty-first century, the television series? Two recent Australian television adaptations, Wake in Fright (2017, dir. Kriv Stenders) and Mystery Road (2018, dir. Rachel Perkins) provoke us to ask the question: how does their pictorial representation of the Australian outback and its inhabitants overtly express rage and its close ties to melancholia, shame and violence? More particularly, I argue that in both series this rage is turned inwards rather than outwards; rage is turned into melancholy and thus to self-destruction – which constructs an allegory for the malaise of our contemporary nation. However, here the two series differ. While Wake in Fright posits this as a never-ending narrative, in a true Freudian model of melancholics who fail to resolve or attend to their trauma, Mystery Road is more positive in its positioning, allowing the themes of apology and recognition to appear, both necessary for reparation and forward movement.Steven Bruhm has argued that a psychoanalytic model of trauma has become the “best [way to] understand the contemporary Gothic and why we crave it” (268), because the repressions and repetitions of trauma offer a means of playing out the anxieties of our contemporary nation, its fraught histories, its conceptualisations of identity, and its fears for the future. Indeed, as Bruhm states, it is precisely because of the way in which “the Gothic continually confronts us with real, historical traumas that we in the west have created” that they “also continue to control how we think about ourselves as a nation” (271). Jerrold E. Hogle agrees, noting that “Gothic fiction has always begun with trauma” (72). But it is not only that Gothic narratives are best understood as traumatic narratives; rather, Hogle posits that the Gothic is uniquely situated as a genre for dealing with the trauma of our personal and national histories because it enables us to approach the contradictions and conflicts of traumatic experience:I find that the best of the post-9/11 uses of Gothic in fiction achieve that purpose for attentive readers by using the conflicted un-naturalness basic to the Gothic itself to help us concurrently grasp and conceal how profoundly conflicted we are about the most immediate and pervasive cultural “woundings” of our western world as it has come to be. (75)Hogle’s point is critical for its attention to the different ways trauma can be dealt with in texts and by readers, returning in part to Sigmund Freud’s distinction between mourning and melancholia: where mourning is the ‘healthy’ process of working through or narrativising trauma. However, melancholia coalesces into a denial or repression of the traumatic event, and thus, as Freud suggests, its unresolved status reappears during nightmares and flashbacks, for example (Rall 171). Hogle’s praise for the Gothic, however, lies in its ability to move away from that binary, to “concurrently grasp and conceal” trauma: in other words, to respond simultaneously with mourning and with melancholy.Hogle adds to this classic perspective of melancholia through careful attention to the way in which rage inflects these affective responses. Under a psychoanalytic model, rage can be seen “as an infantile response to separation and loss” (Kahane 127). The emotional free-rein of rage, Claire Kahane points out, “disempowers us as subjects, making us subject to its regressive vicissitudes” (127; original emphasis). In Bodies That Matter, Judith Butler explicates this in more detail, making clear that this disempowerment, this inability to clearly express oneself, is what leads to melancholia. Melancholia, then, can be seen as a loss or repression of the identifiable cause of the original rage: this overwhelming emotion has masked its original target. “Insofar as grief remains unspeakable”, Butler posits, “the rage over the loss can redouble by virtue of remaining unavowed. And if that very rage over loss is publicly proscribed, the melancholic effects of such a proscription can achieve suicidal proportions” (212). The only way to “survive” rage in this mutated form of melancholia is to create what Butler terms “collective institutions for grieving”; these enablethe reassembling of community, the reworking of kinship, the reweaving of sustaining relations. And insofar as they involve the publicisation and dramatisation of death, they call to be read as life-affirming rejoinders to the dire psychic consequences of a grieving process culturally thwarted and proscribed. (212-13)Butler’s reading thus aligns with Hogle’s, suggesting that it is in our careful attendance to the horrific experience of grief (however difficult) that we could navigate towards something like resolution – not a simplified narrative of working through, to be sure, but a more ethical recognition of the trauma which diverts it from its repressive impossibilities. To further the argument, it is only by transforming melancholic rage into outrage, to respond with an affect that puts shame to work, that rage will become politically effective. So, outrage is “a socialised and mediated form of rage … directed toward identifiable and bounded others in the external world” (Kahane 127-28). Melancholia and shame might then be seen to be directly opposed to one another: the former a failure of rage, the latter its socially productive incarnation.The Australian Gothic and its repetition of a “Weird Melancholy” exhibit this affective model. Ken Gelder has emphasised the historical coincidences: since Australia was colonised around the same time as the emergence of the Gothic as a genre (115), it has always been infused with what he terms a “colonial melancholia” (119). In contemporary Gothic narratives, this is presented through the repetition of the trauma of loss and injustice, so that the colonial “history of brutal violence and exploitation” (121) is played out, over and over again, desperate for resolution. Indeed, Gelder goes so far as to claim that this is the primary fuel for the Gothic as it manifests in Australian literature and film, arguing that since it is “built upon its dispossession and killings of Aboriginal people and its foundational systems of punishment and incarceration, the colonial scene … continues to shadow Australian cultural production and helps to keep the Australian Gothic very much alive” (121).That these two recent television series depict the ways in which rage and outrage appear in a primal ‘colonial scene’ which fixes the Australian Gothic within a political narrative. Both Wake in Fright and Mystery Road are television adaptations of earlier works. Wake in Fright is adapted from Kenneth Cook’s novel of the same name (1961), and its film adaptation (1971, dir. Ted Kotcheff). Mystery Road is a continuation of the film narrative of the same name (2013, dir. Ivan Sen), and its sequel, Goldstone (2016, dir. Ivan Sen). Both narratives illustrate the shift – where the films were first viewed by a high-culture audience attracted to arthouse cinema and modernist fiction – to the re-makes that are viewed in the domestic space of the television screen and/or other devices. Likewise, the television productions were not seen as single episodes, but also linked to each network’s online on-demand streaming viewers, significantly broadening the audience for both works. In this respect, these series both domesticate and democratise the Gothic. The televised series become situated publicly, recalling the broad scale popularity of the Gothic genre, what Helen Wheatley terms “the most domestic of genres on the most domestic of media” (25). In fact, Deborah Cartmell argues that “adaptation is, indeed, the art form of democracy … a ‘freeing’ of a text from the confined territory of its author and of its readers” (8; emphasis added). Likewise, André Bazin echoes this notion that the adaptation is a kind of “digest” of the original work, “a literature that has been made more accessible through cinematic adaptation” (26; emphasis added). In this way, adaptations serve to ‘democratise’ their concerns, focussing these narratives and their themes as more publically accessible, and thus provoking the potential for a broader cultural discussion. Wake in FrightWake in Fright describes the depraved long weekend of schoolteacher John Grant, who is stuck in the rural town of Bundinyabba (“The Yabba”) after he loses all of his money in an ill-advised game of “Two Up.” Modernising the concerns of the original film, in this adaptation John is further endangered by a debt to local loan sharks, and troubled by his frequent flashbacks to his lost lover. The narrative does display drug- and alcohol-induced rage in its infamous pig-shooting (originally roo-shooting) scene, as well as the cold and threatening rage of the loan shark who suspects she will not be paid, both of which are depicted as a specifically white aggression. Overall, its primary depiction of rage is directed inward, rather than outward, and in this way becomes narrowed down to emphasise a more individual, traumatic shame. That is, John’s petulant rage after his girlfriend’s rejection of his marriage proposal manifests in his determination to stolidly drink alone while she swims in the ocean. When she drowns while he is drunk and incapable to rescue her, his inaction becomes the primary source of his shame and exacerbates his self-focused, but repressed rage. The subsequent cycles of drinking (residents of The Yabba only drink beer, and plenty of it) and gambling (as he loses over and over at Two-Up) constitute a repetition of his original trauma over her drowning, and trigger the release of his repressed rage. While accompanying some locals during their drunken pig-shooting expedition, his rage finds an outlet, resulting in the death of his new acquaintance, Doc Tydon. Like John, Doc is the victim of a self-focused rage and shame at the death of his young child and the abdication of his responsibilities as the town’s doctor. Both John and Doc depict the collapse of authority and social order in the “Weird Melancholy” of the outback (Rayner 27), but this “subversion of the stereotype of capable, confident Australian masculinity” (37) and the decay of community and social structure remains static. However, the series does not push forward towards a moral outcome or a suggestion of better actions to inspire the viewer. Even his desperate suicide attempt, what he envisions as the only ‘ethical’ way out of his nightmare, ends in failure and is covered up by the local police. The narrative becomes circular: for John is returned to The Yabba every time he tries to leave, and even in the final scene he is back in Tiboonda, returned to where he started, standing at the front of his classroom. But importantly, this cycle mimics John’s cycle of unresolved shame, suggests an inability to ‘wake’ from this nightmare of repetition, with no acknowledgement of his individual history and his complicity in the traumatic events. Although John has outlived his suicide attempt, this does not validate his survival as a rebirth. Rather, John’s refusal of responsibility and the accompanying complicity of local authorities suggests the inevitability of further self-damaging rage, shame, and violence. Outback NoirBoth Wake in Fright and Mystery Road have been described as “outback noir” (Dolgopolov 12), combining characteristics of the Gothic, the Western, and film noir in their depictions of suffering and the realisation (or abdication) of justice. Greg Dolgopolov explains that while traditional “film noir explores the moral trauma of crime on its protagonists, who are often escaping personal suffering or harrowing incidents from their pasts” (12), these examples of Australian (outback) noir are primarily concerned with “ancestral trauma – that of both Indigenous and settler. Outback noir challenges official versions of events that glide over historical massacres and current injustices” (12-13).Wake in Fright’s focus on John’s personal suffering even as his crimes could become allegories for national trauma, aligns this story with traditional film noir. Mystery Road is caught up with a more collectivised form of trauma, and with the ‘colonialism’ of outback noir means this adaptation is more effective in locating self-rage and melancholia as integral to social and cultural dilemmas of contemporary Australia. Each series takes a different path to the treatment of race relations in Australia within a small and isolated rural context. Wake in Fright chooses to ignore this historical context, setting up the cycle of John’s repression of trauma as an individual fate, and he is trapped to repeat it. On the other hand, Mystery Road, just like its cinematic precursors (Mystery Road and Goldstone), deals with race as a specific theme. Mystery Road’s nod to the noir and the Western is emphasised by the character of Detective Jay Swan: “a lone gunslinger attempting to uphold law and order” (Ward 111), he swaggers around the small township in his cowboy hat, jeans, and boots, stoically searching for clues to the disappearance of two local teenagers. Since Swan is himself Aboriginal, this transforms the representation of authority and its failures depicted in Wake in Fright. While the police in Wake in Fright uphold the law only when convenient to their own goals, and further, to undertake criminal activities themselves, in Mystery Road the authority figures – Jay himself, and his counterpart, Senior Sergeant Emma James, are prominent in the community and dedicated to the pursuit of justice. It is highly significant that this sense of justice reaches beyond the present situation. Emma’s family, the Ballantynes, have been prominent landowners and farmers in the region for over one hundred years, and have always prided themselves on their benevolence towards the local Indigenous population. However, when Emma discovers that her great-grandfather was responsible for the massacre of several young Aboriginal men at the local waterhole, she is overcome by shame. In her horrified tears we see how the legacy of trauma, ever present for the Aboriginal population, is brought home to Emma herself. As the figurehead for justice in the town, Emma is determined to label the murders accurately as a “crime” which must “be answered.” In this acknowledgement and her subsequent apology to Dot, she finds some release from this ancient shame.The only Aboriginal characters in Wake in Fright are marginal to the narrative – taxi drivers who remain peripheral to the traumas within the small town, and thus remain positioned as innocent bystanders to its depravity. However, Mystery Road is careful to avoid such reductionist binaries. Just as Emma discovers the truth about her own family’s violence, Uncle Keith, the current Aboriginal patriarch, is exposed as a sexual predator. In both cases the men, leaders in the past and the present, consider themselves as ‘righteous’ in order to mask their enraged and violent behaviour. The moral issue here is more than a simplistic exposition on race, rather it demonstrates that complexity surrounds those who achieve power. When Dot ultimately ‘inherits’ responsibility for the Aboriginal Land Rights Commission this indicates that Mystery Road concludes with two female figures of authority, both looking out for the welfare of the community as a whole. Likewise, they are involved in seeking the young woman, Shevorne, who becomes the focus of abuse and grief, and her daughter. Although Jay is ultimately responsible for solving the crime at the heart of the series, Mystery Road strives to position futurity and responsibility in the hands of its female characters and their shared sense of community.In conclusion, both television adaptations of classic movies located in Australian outback noir have problematised rage within two vastly different contexts. The adaptations Wake in Fright and Mystery Road do share similar themes and concerns in their responses to past traumas and how that shapes Gothic representation of the outback in present day Australia. However, it is in their treatment of rage, shame, and violence that they diverge. Wake in Fright’s failure to convert rage beyond melancholia means that it fails to offer any hope of resolution, only an ongoing cycle of shame and violence. But rage, as a driver for injustice, can evolve into something more positive. In Mystery Road, the anger of both individuals and the community as a whole moves beyond good/bad and black/white stereotypes of outrage towards a more productive form of shame. In doing so, rage itself can elicit a new model for a more responsible contemporary Australian Gothic narrative.References Bazin, André. “Adaptation, or the Cinema as Digest.” Film Adaptation. 1948. Ed. James Naremore. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers, 2000. 19-27.Bruhm, Steven. “The Contemporary Gothic: Why We Need It.” The Cambridge Companion to Gothic Fiction. Ed. Jerrold E. Hogle. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2002. 259-76.Butler, Judith. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex.” London: Routledge, 1993.Cartmell, Deborah. “100+ Years of Adaptations, or, Adaptation as the Art Form of Democracy.” A Companion to Literature, Film, and Adaptation. Ed. Deborah Cartmell. Chichester: Blackwell, 2012. 1-13.Dolgopolov, Greg. “Balancing Acts: Ivan Sen’s Goldstone and ‘Outback Noir.’” Metro 190 (2016): 8-13.Gelder, Ken. “Australian Gothic.” The Routledge Companion to Gothic. Eds. Catherine Spooner and Emma McEvoy. London: Routledge, 2007. 115-23.Hogle, Jerrold E. “History, Trauma and the Gothic in Contemporary Western Fictions.” The Gothic World. Eds. Glennis Byron and Dale Townshend. London: Routledge, 2014. 72-81.Kahane, Claire. “The Aesthetic Politics of Rage.” States of Rage: Emotional Eruption, Violence, and Social Change. Eds. Renée R. Curry and Terry L. Allison. New York: New York UP, 1996. 126-45.Perkins, Rachel, dir. Mystery Road. ABC, 2018.Rall, Denise N. “‘Shock and Awe’ and Memory: The Evocation(s) of Trauma in post-9/11 Artworks.” Memory and the Wars on Terror: Australian and British Perspectives. Eds. Jessica Gildersleeve and Richard Gehrmann. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. 163-82.Rayner, Jonathan. Contemporary Australian Cinema: An Introduction. Manchester: Manchester UP, 2000.Stenders, Kriv, dir. Wake in Fright. Roadshow Entertainment, 2017.Ward, Sarah. “Shadows of a Sunburnt Country: Mystery Road, the Western and the Conflicts of Contemporary Australia.” Screen Education 81 (2016): 110-15.Wheatley, Helen. “Haunted Houses, Hidden Rooms: Women, Domesticity and the Gothic Adaptation on Television.” Popular Television Drama: Critical Perspectives. Eds. Jonathan Bignell and Stephen Lacey. Manchester: Manchester UP, 2005. 149-65.