Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / FIRO-B

Contents

Journal articles

Academic literature on the topic 'FIRO-B'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 1 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'FIRO-B.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "FIRO-B"

1

Pospíšilová, Alexandra, and Andrea Sandanusová. "FIRO-B: Recenze metody." TESTFÓRUM 8, no. 13 (2020): 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/tf2020-13-14050.

Full text

Abstract:

Dotazník FIRO-B môže byť použitý v oblasti pracovnej psychológie, napríklad pri práci so skupinou, ďalej v oblasti individuálneho, párového alebo skupinového poradenstva. Konkrétne môže poslúžiť ako pomocný nástroj pri poznávaní svojich interpersonálnych potrieb a ich kompatibility vo vzťahu k druhým ľuďom. FIRO-B môže slúžiť ako facilitačná metóda, ktorá umožňuje či už dvojici alebo členom skupiny zistiť, čo od seba navzájom vyžadujú a ako si myslia, že sa sami prejavujú. Predpokladáme, že vzhľadom k vysokej zjavnej validite a len mierne líšiacim sa položkám proband vie, čo svojimi odpoveďami vyjadruje. FIRO-B môže poslúžiť ako pomocná metóda, ktorá môže poskytnúť podnet k rozhovoru, alebo ako doplnková metóda k iným nástrojom. Pričom je dôležité upozorniť participanta na vyššie uvedené nedostatky metódy a najmä na zastaranosť noriem, aby na svoje výsledky nahliadal s potrebnou rezervou a odstupom. Taktiež je dôležité, aby si bol týchto nedostatkov vedomý aj samotný užívateľ metódy, najmä kvôli nejasnostiam v spôsobe interpretovania skóre (prisudzovanie váhy interpretačným absolútnym meradlám a normám). Metódu však neodporúčame používať ako samostatný diagnostický nástroj a jeho výsledky interpretovať za účelom individuálnej diagnostiky.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Macrosson, W. D. K. "FIRO–B: Factors and Facets." Psychological Reports 86, no. 1 (2000): 311–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.2000.86.1.311.

Full text

Abstract:

10 FIRO–B intercorrelation matrices were factor analysed; one matrix was derived from new FIRO–B data, all the other matrices were found in the literature. The correlation matrices were also subjected to meta-analysis. The findings suggested that the four FIRO–B scales associated with Inclusion and Affection are facets of the ubiquitous interpersonal superfactor, Nurturance, but the two FIRO–B Control scales each express an orthogonal construct both of which relate to the superfactor, Dominance.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Macrosson, W. D. K., and J. H. Semple. "FIRO-B, Machiavellianism, and Teams." Psychological Reports 88, no. 3_suppl (2001): 1187–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.2001.88.3c.1187.

Full text

Abstract:

A correlational study using the Mach IV and FIRO-B questionnaires examined the attitudes of 120 postgraduate and undergraduate students, the majority of whom had significant work experience. A curvilinear relationship observed between the FIRO-B and Mach IV scales calls into question an aspect of Will Schutz's prescription for interpersonal compatibility.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Salminen, Simo. "Convergent and Discriminant Validity of Firo-B Questionnaire." Psychological Reports 69, no. 3 (1991): 787–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1991.69.3.787.

Full text

Abstract:

The Kramer-Froehle controversy about the construct validity of FIRO-B questionnaire was evaluated with a multitrait-multimethod design. 113 women and 26 men completed the FIRO-B questionnaire. After the examiner had given a lecture on the FIRO-dimensions, the subjects rated themselves on these dimensions. Only three out of six intercorrelations on the validity diagonal were statistically significant. Of the discriminant validity comparisons 80% met the required criterion. Our results confirmed Kramer's results about the construct validity of the FIRO-B questionnaire.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Furnham, Adrian. "Psychometric Correlates of FIRO-B Scores: Locating the FIRO-B scores in personality factor space." International Journal of Selection and Assessment 16, no. 1 (2008): 30–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2008.00407.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

McRae, Lissa S. E., and Jeffrey D. Young. "Field Independence and the Firo-B." Perceptual and Motor Skills 70, no. 2 (1990): 493–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.1990.70.2.493.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Hurley, John R. "Further Evidence against the Construct Validity of the Firo-B Scales." Psychological Reports 70, no. 2 (1992): 639–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1992.70.2.639.

Full text

Abstract:

Rearranging Salminen's 1991 correlations between the interpersonal need scales of Schutz's FIRO-B and parallel self-ratings indicates that only one of six FIRO-B scales satisfied the convergent and discriminant criteria for construct validity that Campbell and Fiske provided in 1959. Augmenting a growing body of negative reports regarding the contruct validity of FIRO-B and related measures, these adverse findings heighten concerns about this family of instruments.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Floyd, Nubra Elaine. "Interpersonal Orientation and Living Group Preferences: A Validity Check on FIRO-B." Psychological Reports 62, no. 3 (1988): 923–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1988.62.3.923.

Full text

Abstract:

Construct validity of Schutz's FIRO-B was tested in terms of correlation with a Living Group Questionnaire developed to assess the interpersonal preferences of 123 students in an experimental college. After controlling for the intercorrelation of FIRO-B subscales, some Living Group Questionnaire items still appeared to tap more than one dimension of interpersonal need, but sex differences were found to account for the overlap. Results were seen as generally substantiating the validity of the FIRO-B.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Salminen, Simo. "Two Psychometric Problems of the Firo-B Questionnaire." Psychological Reports 63, no. 2 (1988): 423–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1988.63.2.423.

Full text

Abstract:

Two psychometric problems of FIRO-B scales, namely, reliability and social desirability, were studied. Subjects were 152 women and 36 men from the introductory course in social psychology. They completed the FIRO-B questionnaire and the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Three of the six coefficients of reproducibility were below a satisfactory level. All scalability coefficients were near the level usually required. Correlations among scores on all expressed needs scales and the social desirability scale were statistically significant. Also, wanted control was related to social desirability. We can doubt that the good reliability of FIRO-scales was based on acquiescence because reliability was not good enough just for those scales on which some items were reversed. The bias from social desirability in expressed needs was explained by the possibility that the subjects were more likely to see that the object of the measurement was themselves.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

SALMINEN, SIMO. "CONVERGENT AND DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY OF FIRO-B QUESTIONNAIRE." Psychological Reports 69, no. 7 (1991): 787. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.69.7.787-790.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

More sources

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!