Academic literature on the topic 'Forage harvester'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Forage harvester.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Forage harvester"
Harmon, Joshua D., Brian D. Luck, Kevin J. Shinners, Robert P. Anex, and Jessica L. Drewry. "Time-Motion Analysis of Forage Harvest: A Case Study." Transactions of the ASABE 61, no. 2 (2018): 483–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/trans.12484.
Full textGalimov, Rufan, Kirill Maksimovich, and Vitaliy Tikhonovskiy. "Evaluation of combines transport support effectiveness for harvesting silage crops in Western Siberia." E3S Web of Conferences 175 (2020): 05030. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202017505030.
Full textPecenka, Ralf, Jadir Nogueira Silva, Detlef Ehlert, and Gerd Volkhard Scholz. "MECHANISED HARVEST OF ENERGY WOOD: STATE-OF-THE-ART AND NEW DEVELOPMENTS." REVISTA ENGENHARIA NA AGRICULTURA - REVENG 24, no. 1 (May 4, 2016): 32–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.13083/reveng.v24i1.638.
Full textH. Page Harrison. "Treatment of Forage with Sulphur Dioxide in a Forage Harvester." Transactions of the ASAE 28, no. 2 (1985): 356–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.32257.
Full textSteen, R. W. J. "The effect of field wilting and mechanical treatment on the feeding value of grass silage for beef cattle and on beef output per hectare." Animal Science 41, no. 3 (December 1985): 281–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0003356100036333.
Full textJackson, M. A., R. J. Readman, J. A. Huntington, and L. A. Sinclair. "The effects of processing at harvest and cutting height of urea-treated whole-crop wheat on performance and digestibility in dairy cows." Animal Science 78, no. 3 (June 2004): 467–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1357729800058860.
Full textThompson, Serena, Jenny Koebernick, Russell C. Carrell, Madison Cole, and S. Leanne L. Dillard. "Evaluating Soybean Cultivars for Forage Yield and Nutritive Values." Journal of Animal Science 99, Supplement_2 (May 1, 2021): 21–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skab096.037.
Full textD. Tremblay, P. Savoie, and Q. Le Phat. "Reducing Forage Harvester Peak Power with a Flywheel." Applied Engineering in Agriculture 7, no. 1 (1991): 41–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.26188.
Full textWeirich Neto, Pedro H., Paulo W. Garbuio, Nátali M. de Souza, Hevandro C. Delalibera, and Khetlen Leitão. "Fragment size of corn silage according to the dry matter and forage harvester adjustments." Engenharia Agrícola 33, no. 4 (August 2013): 764–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-69162013000400016.
Full textGalimov, R. R., K. YU Maksimovich, V. V. Tikhonovskiy, and S. A. Voynash. "Evaluation of the efficiency of transport services for forage harvesters when harvesting maize for silage in Novosibirsk region." Traktory i sel'hozmashiny 1, no. 1 (2021): 73–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.31992/0321-4443-2021-1-73-80.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Forage harvester"
Larson, Geremy. "Self-propelled forage harvester sales analysis." Thesis, Kansas State University, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/2097/35746.
Full textDepartment of Agricultural Economics
Major Professor Not Listed
Self-propelled forage harvesters are used to make feed for livestock. Producers prefer forage made with these machines because they are able to deliver a feed value that enables improved productivity of their animals in terms of milk production for dairy animals and weight gain for beef animals. Self-propelled forage harvesters are able to make a variety of feed from different crops, including whole-plant corn silage, earlage, and haylage, among others. The self-propelled forage harvester is a complex and expensive piece of machinery for a producer to own. The self-propelled forage harvester market in the United States is a growing market, but small when compared to other equipment such as combines. In today’s environment, productivity is crucial to the success of the agricultural producer. Self-propelled forage harvesters are no exception. Growth of the self-propelled forage harvester market is reflected in increased unit sales, total horsepower sold, and average horsepower of the selfpropelled forage harvesters sold in the United States. This study looks at changes in the number and size of self-propelled forage harvesters being purchased and what factors might be driving those changes. This study found that the amount of milk produced, the type of customer purchasing the equipment, and the average price of milk a producer received explained 81.2% of the variation in the number of self-propelled forage harvesters sold from 2000- 2014. Study results also show that the size of dairy operation, the type of customer purchasing the equipment, and the average price of milk explained 88% of the variability in total horsepower of self-propelled forage harvesters sold from 2000-2014. Finally, the size of dairy operation that a typical cow comes from, the type of customer purchasing the equipment, and the average price of corn were able to explain 98% of the variation of average horsepower of self-propelled forage harvesters over that same time period. The model and analysis will be shared with product planners from John Deere as they develop new machine specifications for self-propelled forage harvesters in the future.
Roberge, Martin. "Design and evaluation of performance of a crop processor for a pull-type forage harvester." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1999. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk1/tape8/PQDD_0020/NQ55375.pdf.
Full textŠimunský, Marek. "Design samojízdné sklízecí řezačky." Master's thesis, Vysoké učení technické v Brně. Fakulta strojního inženýrství, 2017. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-318784.
Full textGarbuio, Paulo William. "INFLUÊNCIA DO CONTEÚDO DE MATÉRIA SECA E REGULAGENS DE UMA COLHEDORA DE FORRAGEM NOS TAMANHOS DE FRAGMENTOS E NA DENSIDADE DA SILAGEM DE PLANTA INTEIRA DE DOIS HÍBRIDOS DE MILHO (Zea mays L.) 2008." UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE PONTA GROSSA, 2008. http://tede2.uepg.br/jspui/handle/prefix/2184.
Full textCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
In Brazil, the best dairy farm efficiency levels are obtained in the cities of Castro and Carambeí, State of Paraná. This efficiency was reached due to the animal genetics and the feed management, where the corn whole plant silage has been wide used. To the highest profit of the silage, some stages must be considered. The main stages are the selection of the forage harvest point, the plants chopping and the silo compaction. This work aims to present the possible interactions between the factors: plants water content, forage harvester setup with the plant particles size and de silage compaction process. The two corn hybrids (SPEED e 2B688) studied had been harvested in five times (105, 108, 112, 118, 123 seeding after days). In every harvest time it was evaluated the relative participation of the plant components, the dry matter, the fresh mass and grains yields and the milk line, to each corn hybrid. To the silage chopping evaluation, 120 plants were harvested and chopped with a forage harvest using three setups. The chopped material was used to the particles size determination and later submitted to the compaction process. To the grains and fresh mass yield, and milk line evaluation, the treatment was the harvest times, with five replications. The analysis of variance applied completely randomized experimental design. It was analyzed the correlation between the dry matter and the milk line. The particle size and silage bulk density analysis was carried through a factorial 5x3 design with four replications, where the first factor had been the harvest times, and the second the three forage harvester setups. Only one hybrid presented a high correlation between the milk line and the dry matter, showing the milk line method to be not a good way to evaluate the dry matter of plants, and behaves by different ways according the corn hybrid. To the grains yield, the SPEED hybrid showed difference, between the first and the three last harvest times. The compaction test showed a high correlation between the green mass density with the plant maturation, where plants with highest dry matter content make the compaction more difficult. Differences was verified to the silage bulk density according to the forage harvest setup, when the chopped material in the setup to theoretical cut length (TCL) of 2mm had easy compaction that the setups to TCL of 6,5 and 11 mm. To the particle size, when evaluated the hybrid 2B688, the different plant dry matter levels had not effects in the average particle size. However, to the hybrid SPEED, the particles size reduced with the plants maturation. To the evaluated materials, the dry matter content, as well as the forage harvest setups affected the green mass bulk density and the real particles size. The forage harvest setup changes resulted in different particle sizes that the informed by the manufacturer.
No Brasil, os melhores índices em eficiência leiteira encontram-se nos municípios de Castro e Carambeí no Paraná, alcançados devido à genética dos animais e ao manejo alimentar, em que a silagem de planta inteira de milho tem sido largamente utilizada. Para o máximo aproveitamento da silagem várias etapas devem ser consideradas, tais como escolha do ponto de colheita da forragem, fragmentação das plantas bem como o processo de compactação. Neste sentido, o objetivo deste trabalho é discutir as possíveis interações entre o conteúdo de água da forragem e a regulagem da colhedora nos tamanhos de fragmentos e na densidade da silagem. Em todos os ensaios utilizaram-se dois híbridos de milho (SPEED e 2B688), sendo estes colhidos em cinco épocas (105, 108, 112, 118, 123 dias após semeadura (DAS)). Foram determinados nos genótipos a participação relativa dos componentes formadores das plantas, a matéria seca (MS), o rendimento de massa verde, seca e de grãos e a linha do leite. Para a fragmentação foram colhidas manualmente 120 plantas, estas submetidas à uma colhedora de forragem, em três regulagens. O material fragmentado foi utilizado para a determinação dos tamanhos de fragmentos e submetido ao processo de compactação. Para o rendimento de grãos, de massa verde e seca e a determinação da linha do leite, utilizaram-se como tratamentos as épocas de colheita, com cinco repetições. Os valores foram submetidos à análise de variância em delineamento inteiramente casualizado (DIC). Realizou-se também a análise de correlação entre MS e linha do leite. As análises de tamanho de fragmento e densidade da silagem foram realizadas no esquema fatorial de 5x3 com quatro repetições, onde o primeiro fator foram as épocas de colheita, o segundo três regulagens da máquina (2, 6,5 e 11 mm de comprimento teórico de fragmento (CTF)). Foi verificada estreita relação entre a linha do leite com a MS de um dos genótipos, o que mostra que esta metodologia não é a mais indicada para determinar a MS das plantas, e é variável com o genótipo. Quanto ao rendimento, houve diferença na variável grãos para o híbrido SPEED, entre a primeira e as três últimas épocas de colheita. No ensaio de compactação, observou-se alta relação entre a densidade de massa verde com a maturação da planta, em que plantas com elevado conteúdo de MS dificultam a compactação. Constataram-se também diferenças para a densidade da silagem conforme regulagens da máquina, sendo que a regulagem de 2 mm de CTF, favorece a compactação quando comparada as regulagens de 6,5 e 11 mm de CTF. No ensaio de tamanho de fragmento verificou-se que para o híbrido 2B688, os teores de MS da planta não mostraram efeito sobre o tamanho médio de fragmento porém, para o híbrido PEED verificou-se redução no tamanho de fragmento real com a maturação das plantas. Concluiu-se que, para os genótipos, o conteúdo de MS bem como as regulagens da máquina interferem na densidade de massa verde e nos tamanhos de fragmentos reais obtidos. A alteração das regulagens da máquina resulta em tamanhos de fragmentos diferentes aos indicados pelo fabricante.
Alves, Pamela José [UNESP]. "Milho para silagem: semeadura e colheita em Latossolo sob preparo convencional." Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/88289.
Full textCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
A produção de silagem é atividade importante para a alimentação do rebanho brasileiro e, neste aspecto, o planejamento da produção se torna indispensável para se obter uma maior produtividade. A escolha do híbrido adequado e a maneira como será feita a semeadura influencia a produção final, interferindo quantitativa e qualitativamente no desenvolvimento da cultura. A qualidade na colheita de culturas destinadas à silagem, que envolve o tamanho de fragmentos e altura de corte, é fundamental para que as condições da silagem sejam atendidas. O presente estudo foi conduzido em área experimental do Laboratório de Máquinas e Mecanização Agrícola (LAMMA UNESP/Jaboticabal) da Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Câmpus de Jaboticabal, com o objetivo de avaliar: o desempenho de uma semeadora-adubadora em Latossolo sob preparo convencional; as características do material colhido e as perdas na colheita de forragem; a resistência mecânica do solo à penetração, densidade e umidade do solo, em um sistema de produção de milho para silagem. No desempenho da semeadora-adubadora, a maior velocidade proporcionou o menor consumo operacional de combustível e maior capacidade de campo. As características de desenvolvimento da cultura não foram alteradas pelas velocidades e somente a altura da planta diferiu em função dos híbridos utilizados. A densidade e a resistência mecânica do solo à penetração apresentaram valores elevados para solos mobilizados. Na colheita, o consumo de combustível foi superior quando empregada a maior rotação das facas de corte. A perda média na colheita de forragem foi de 2% da produtividade.
The silage production is an important activity for alimentation of the Brazilian herd. For higher productivity, planning is essential. The choice of hybrid and appropriate sowing change the final production. The quality at sowing affect qualitatively and quantitatively the culture development. The quality of the harvest of crops intended for silage, which involves the size of fragments and height of cut is critical to reach the silage requirements. This study was conducted in the experimental area of the Laboratório de Máquinas e Mecanização Agrícola (LAMMA UNESP/Jaboticabal) of the Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Campus Jaboticabal. The objective of this study was to evaluate: the performance of a seeder-fertilizer in Oxisol under conventional tillage; the characteristics of the harvested matter and losses at forage harvest; the soil mechanical resistance to penetration, density and soil moisture in a production system of maize for silage. In the performance of the seeder-fertilizer, the higher speed provided the lowest fuel consumption and increased the operational field capacity. The development of the culture were not changed by the speed at seeding and only the plant height differed depending on the hybrid used. The density and soil mechanical resistance to penetration showed high values for soil mobilized. At harvest, the fuel consumption was higher than that employed the largest rotation of the cutting knives. The average loss at harvest of forage was 2% in productivity.
Alves, Pamela José. "Milho para silagem : semeadura e colheita em Latossolo sob preparo convencional /." Jaboticabal : [s.n.], 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/88289.
Full textBanca: Rouverson Pereira da Silva
Banca: Wilson José Oliveira de Souza
Resumo: A produção de silagem é atividade importante para a alimentação do rebanho brasileiro e, neste aspecto, o planejamento da produção se torna indispensável para se obter uma maior produtividade. A escolha do híbrido adequado e a maneira como será feita a semeadura influencia a produção final, interferindo quantitativa e qualitativamente no desenvolvimento da cultura. A qualidade na colheita de culturas destinadas à silagem, que envolve o tamanho de fragmentos e altura de corte, é fundamental para que as condições da silagem sejam atendidas. O presente estudo foi conduzido em área experimental do Laboratório de Máquinas e Mecanização Agrícola (LAMMA UNESP/Jaboticabal) da Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", Câmpus de Jaboticabal, com o objetivo de avaliar: o desempenho de uma semeadora-adubadora em Latossolo sob preparo convencional; as características do material colhido e as perdas na colheita de forragem; a resistência mecânica do solo à penetração, densidade e umidade do solo, em um sistema de produção de milho para silagem. No desempenho da semeadora-adubadora, a maior velocidade proporcionou o menor consumo operacional de combustível e maior capacidade de campo. As características de desenvolvimento da cultura não foram alteradas pelas velocidades e somente a altura da planta diferiu em função dos híbridos utilizados. A densidade e a resistência mecânica do solo à penetração apresentaram valores elevados para solos mobilizados. Na colheita, o consumo de combustível foi superior quando empregada a maior rotação das facas de corte. A perda média na colheita de forragem foi de 2% da produtividade.
Abstract: The silage production is an important activity for alimentation of the Brazilian herd. For higher productivity, planning is essential. The choice of hybrid and appropriate sowing change the final production. The quality at sowing affect qualitatively and quantitatively the culture development. The quality of the harvest of crops intended for silage, which involves the size of fragments and height of cut is critical to reach the silage requirements. This study was conducted in the experimental area of the Laboratório de Máquinas e Mecanização Agrícola (LAMMA UNESP/Jaboticabal) of the Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", Campus Jaboticabal. The objective of this study was to evaluate: the performance of a seeder-fertilizer in Oxisol under conventional tillage; the characteristics of the harvested matter and losses at forage harvest; the soil mechanical resistance to penetration, density and soil moisture in a production system of maize for silage. In the performance of the seeder-fertilizer, the higher speed provided the lowest fuel consumption and increased the operational field capacity. The development of the culture were not changed by the speed at seeding and only the plant height differed depending on the hybrid used. The density and soil mechanical resistance to penetration showed high values for soil mobilized. At harvest, the fuel consumption was higher than that employed the largest rotation of the cutting knives. The average loss at harvest of forage was 2% in productivity.
Mestre
Hráček, Petr. "Design zemědělské samojízdné řezačky." Master's thesis, Vysoké učení technické v Brně. Fakulta strojního inženýrství, 2008. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-227902.
Full textSuwarno. "Improvement of alfalfa forage quality by maceration at harvest." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1999. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/ftp02/NQ41629.pdf.
Full textOttman, M. J. "Influence of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Alfalfa Harvestern on Short Intervals." College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1995. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/201440.
Full textProbst, Thomas Adam. "HARVEST FREQUENCY AND CULTIVAR EFFECTS ON YIELD, QUALITY, AND REGROWTH RATE AMONG NEW ALFALFA CULTIVARS." UKnowledge, 2008. http://uknowledge.uky.edu/gradschool_theses/527.
Full textBooks on the topic "Forage harvester"
Moore, Kenneth J., and Michael A. Peterson, eds. Post-Harvest Physiology and Preservation of Forages. Madison, WI, USA: Crop Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cssaspecpub22.
Full textManske, Llewellyn L. Increasing value captured from the land natural resources: An evaluation of pasture forage and harvested forage management strategies for each range cow production period. Dickinson, N.D: North Dakota State University, Dickinson Research Extension Center, 2007.
Find full textManske, Llewellyn L. Increasing value captured from the land natural resources: An evaluation of pasture forage and harvested forage management strategies for each range cow production period. Dickinson, N.D: North Dakota State University, Dickinson Research Extension Center, 2007.
Find full textManske, Llewellyn L. Evaluation and development of twelve-month pasture and harvested forage management strategies for range cows based on capture of new wealth from the land natural resources. 2nd ed. Dickinson, N.D: North Dakota State University, Dickinson Research Extension Center, 2008.
Find full textManske, Llewellyn L. Evaluation and development of twelve-month pasture and harvested forage management strategies for range cows based on capture of new wealth from the land natural resources. 2nd ed. Dickinson, N.D: North Dakota State University, Dickinson Research Extension Center, 2008.
Find full textManske, Llewellyn L. Evaluation and development of twelve-month pasture and harvested forage management strategies for range cows based on capture of new wealth from the land natural resources. 2nd ed. Dickinson, N.D: North Dakota State University, Dickinson Research Extension Center, 2008.
Find full textHarvested Forages. Elsevier, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-356255-5.x5022-6.
Full textTrace mineral contents of harvested forages. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, 1996.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Forage harvester"
Huang, Yan, Manquan Zhao, and Hantao Liu. "Analysis of Airflow Field of Toss Device of Yellow Corn Forage Harvester." In Computer and Computing Technologies in Agriculture VII, 486–91. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54341-8_51.
Full textBerger, L. L., G. C. Fahey, L. D. Bourquin, and E. C. Titgemeyer. "Modification of Forage Quality after Harvest." In Forage Quality, Evaluation, and Utilization, 922–66. Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/1994.foragequality.c23.
Full textLowell, Moser E. "Post-Harvest Physiological Changes in Forage Plants." In Post-Harvest Physiology and Preservation of Forages, 1–19. Madison, WI, USA: Crop Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cssaspecpub22.c1.
Full textRoberts, Craig A. "Microbiology of Stored Forages." In Post-Harvest Physiology and Preservation of Forages, 21–38. Madison, WI, USA: Crop Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cssaspecpub22.c2.
Full textRotz, C. Alan. "Field Curing of Forages." In Post-Harvest Physiology and Preservation of Forages, 39–66. Madison, WI, USA: Crop Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cssaspecpub22.c3.
Full textRotz, C. Alan, and Richard E. Muck. "Changes in Forage Quality During Harvest and Storage." In Forage Quality, Evaluation, and Utilization, 828–68. Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/1994.foragequality.c20.
Full textSheaffer, C. C. "Legume Establishment and Harvest Management in the U.S.A." In Persistence of Forage Legumes, 277–91. Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/1989.persistenceofforagelegumes.c20.
Full textPottier, Eric, and William Martin-Rosset. "Chapter 11. Harvest and preservation of forages." In Equine nutrition, 385–404. The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-855-1_11.
Full textMüller, C. E. "Impact of harvest, preservation and storage conditions on forage quality." In Forages and grazing in horse nutrition, 237–53. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-755-4_29.
Full textAlarcon-Zuniga, B., J. J. M. Ramirez-Gonzalez, S. Quijano-Hernandez, and T. Cervantes-Martinez. "Yield Components of Three Brachiaria Species Harvested at Two Cutting Frequencies in Hueytamalco, Puebla, Mexico." In Molecular Breeding of Forage and Turf, 123–30. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08714-6_11.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Forage harvester"
Yuan, Xiang, Yong Decheng Wang, and Jing Lin. "Household forage harvester." In 2021 ASABE Annual International Virtual Meeting, July 12-16, 2021. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/aim.202100242.
Full textZhang, Xuening, Yong You, Decheng Wang, Xianshun Sun, Jie Lv, Ziwen Guo, Peng Xu, Jun Luo, Zhiguo Ma, and Hongda Wang. "Self-propelled forage harvester." In 2020 ASABE Annual International Virtual Meeting, July 13-15, 2020. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/aim.202000405.
Full textGantsevskii, V. М., P. A. Orlovskii, А. IU Papsha, V. А. Pigenko, and S. А. Sergeev. "FORAGE HARVESTER CHOPPING MECHANISM OPTIMIZATION USING SIMULATION TECHNIQUES." In STATE AND DEVELOPMENT PROSPECTS OF AGRIBUSINESS. DSTU-PRINT, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.23947/interagro.2020.1.455-458.
Full textKokunova, I. V. "INTELLIGENT SOLUTIONS IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF MODERN BALING MACHINES." In INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN SCIENCE AND EDUCATION. DSTU-Print, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.23947/itno.2020.208-212.
Full textMin Zhang and Dennis R. Buckmaster. "The Design and Evaluation of A Novel Forage Harvester." In 2001 Sacramento, CA July 29-August 1,2001. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.7344.
Full text"Monitoring of a forage harvester using multiple sensor fusion." In 2015 ASABE International Meeting. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/aim.20152179904.
Full textNedelcu, Ancuta, Radu Ciuperca, Ana Zaica, and Vasilica Stefan. "Influence of forage harvester chopping equipment on characteristics of chips." In 19th International Scientific Conference Engineering for Rural Development. Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Faculty of Engineering, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.22616/erdev.2020.19.tf330.
Full textSmith, Larry N., and Ron Burk. "A Flexible Hydraulic System for a Self-Propelled Forage Harvester." In Agricultural Machinery Conference. 400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA, United States: SAE International, 1985. http://dx.doi.org/10.4271/851092.
Full text"The Modal Analysis of the Self-propelled Forage Harvester Rack." In 2014 ASABE Annual International Meeting. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/aim.20141896204.
Full textMatthew F. Digman and Kevin J. Shinners. "Real-time Moisture Measurement on a Forage Harvester using Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy." In 2006 Portland, Oregon, July 9-12, 2006. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.21433.
Full textReports on the topic "Forage harvester"
Skone, Timothy J. Diesel Forage Harvester, 615 Horsepower, Construction. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), January 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1509044.
Full textEisenbies, Mark, Timothy Volk, Lawrence Abrahamson, Richard Shuren, Brian Stanton, John Posselius, Matt McArdle, et al. Development and Deployment of a Short Rotation Woody Crops Harvesting System Based on a Case New Holland Forage Harvester and SRC Woody Crop Header. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), October 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1164395.
Full textButler, J., M. Downing, and A. Turhollow. Forage Harvest and Transport Costs. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), December 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/5842.
Full textSECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC. Guide To Harvest Falcon Electrical System Installation - Air Force Handbook 10-222, Volume 10. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, May 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada423948.
Full textMassachusetts self-employed farmer killed when a corn chopper head attachment for a forage harvester falls onto him. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, October 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.26616/nioshsface00ma014.
Full text