Relevant bibliographies by topics / Forgiveness vs

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Book chapters

Academic literature on the topic 'Forgiveness vs'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 5 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Forgiveness vs.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Forgiveness vs"

1

Fetscherin, Marc, and Alexandra Sampedro. "Brand forgiveness." Journal of Product & Brand Management 28, no. 5 (August 19, 2019): 633–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jpbm-04-2018-1845.

Full text
Abstract:
Purpose This paper aims to explore and discuss the concept of brand forgiveness. It empirically assesses the relationships among three types of brand transgressions, brand forgiveness and three consumer coping strategies. Design/methodology/approach A 3 × 2 research design is used to evaluate the effects of three types of brand transgression (performance, image and value) and two degrees of severity (high vs low) for brand forgiveness. Then, this paper use a 2 × 3 research design, evaluating two degrees of brand forgiveness (high vs low) together with their effects on three different consumer coping strategies (switching, attacking and purchasing again). Using a representative sample of 472 US consumers, various hypotheses related to these research designs are tested. Findings The results show that almost half (48 per cent) of the consumers are unlikely or very unlikely to forgive a brand compared to about a third (32 per cent) who are likely or very likely to forgive. The results of ANOVA show the more severe the brand transgression, the less likely the forgiveness. Consumers who are more likely to forgive are less likely to avoid the brand or engage in attacking behaviors; they are also more likely to purchase the brand again. The results of regression analyses show that consumers witnessing a performance-based brand transgression are more likely to forgive the brand than in the case of image- or value-based brand transgressions. Originality/value This paper explores and outlines the brand forgiveness construct, both theoretically and empirically.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Luchies, Laura B., Eli J. Finkel, Anthony E. Coy, Chelsea A. Reid, Daryl R. Van Tongeren, Jody L. Davis, and Jeffrey D. Green. "People feel worse about their forgiveness when mismatches between forgiveness and amends create adaptation risks." Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 36, no. 2 (November 23, 2017): 681–705. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407517740983.

Full text
Abstract:
Building on principles of evolutionary psychology and sociometer theory, we propose that people feel worse about the extent to which they have forgiven when their forgiveness level increases their risk of exploitation or their risk of spoiling a valuable relationship. We predicted that people would feel worse about their forgiveness level when they grant a high level of forgiveness to a perpetrator who has made weak (vs. strong) amends, thereby heightening their risk of exploitation (H1). We also predicted that people would feel worse about their forgiveness level when they grant a low (vs. high) level of forgiveness to a perpetrator who has made strong amends, thereby putting the value of their relationship with the perpetrator at risk (H2). We conducted a longitudinal study of transgressions occurring in romantic relationships and two experiments to test these ideas. H1 was supported in two of the three studies; H2 was supported in all three. A mini meta-analysis indicated that both effects were reliable across the program of research. These results suggest that feelings about one’s forgiveness level serve a functional purpose: Feeling bad about one’s forgiveness level signals that the current combination of amends and forgiveness levels may be causing an adaptation risk.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Yao, Donna Jingdan, and Melody M. Chao. "When Forgiveness Signals Power: Effects of Forgiveness Expression and Forgiver Gender." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 45, no. 2 (July 20, 2018): 310–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167218784904.

Full text
Abstract:
Forgiveness has been regarded as a sign of power, yet empirical evidence is mixed. This research seeks to resolve this inconsistency by looking into how and from whom forgiveness is expressed. Integrating theories on forgiveness, communication, and gender role, we hypothesized and found, in two experiments, that a third party’s perception of forgiver power is jointly influenced by forgiveness expression (explicit vs. implicit) and forgiver gender. Female forgivers were perceived as less powerful than their male counterparts when forgivers expressed implicit forgiveness, whereas this gender difference was not found when forgivers expressed explicit forgiveness. Perceived forgiver power, in turn, positively influenced third parties’ cooperation with the forgiver in subsequent interaction. This research represents an initial step to understanding forgiveness from a communication perspective. It demonstrates the social implications of forgiveness on uninvolved third parties. Our findings also resonate with several others in showing that forgiveness does not always yield interpersonal benefits.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Shahidi, Shahriar, Behnaz Zaal, and Mohammad Ali Mazaheri. "Forgiveness in Relation to Attachment Style and Consanguine Marriage in Iranian Married Individuals." Psychological Reports 110, no. 2 (April 2012): 489–500. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/02.21.pr0.110.2.489-500.

Full text
Abstract:
The aim of this study was to compare forgiveness in secure and insecure Iranian married couples. Whether marriage had occurred within the family (consanguine) or not (non-consanguine) was also considered. 400 married participants completed the Family Forgiveness Scale and the Adult Attachment Questionnaire. Analysis of reported forgiveness within the marital family showed that, although there was no significant difference between secure and insecure participants in overall forgiveness, secure participants rated “reparation” and “resolution” higher, whereas insecure participants rated “realization” and “recognition” higher. Comparing the experience of forgiveness in the family of origin, securely attached couples not only reported significantly more overall forgiveness but reported more “realization” and “resolution” while forgiving. Some interesting sex differences were also found, as individuals in consanguine vs non-consanguine couples differed in mean “recognition” in the forgiveness process.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Beltrán-Morillas, A. M., I. Valor-Segura, and F. Expósito. "EL PAPEL DE LA DISTANCIA SOCIAL EN EL PERDÓN DE LA VIOLENCIA PSICOLÓGICA: MALESTAR PERSONAL Y COACCIÓN COMO RESPUESTA DE AFRONTAMIENTO." International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology. Revista INFAD de Psicología. 2, no. 1 (October 22, 2017): 291. http://dx.doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2017.n1.v2.940.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract.THE ROLE OF SOCIAL DISTANCE IN THE FORGIVENESS OF PSYCHOLOGICAL VIOLENCE: PERSONAL EVIL AND COACTION AS A RESPONSEThrough two studies, the present investigation analyzes the process of forgiveness before a situation of psychological abuse, depending on the social distance in relation to the person who transgresses. In the first study (n = 145), the granting of forgiveness to different types of violence (physical vs. psychological). The results showed that psychological degree (vs. physical). In the second study (n = 155) pardon, discomfort or personal distress was analyzed and coercion as a coping response, as a function of social distance (actor vs. observer). The results showed that personal discomfort is related to less forgiveness, and this in turn, is related to less coercion, especially in the condition of actor (observer). Likewise, the results also showed that forgiveness mediates the relationship between personal discomfort and resolution of coercion, especially when it comes to the perspective of the actor.Key words: Psychological abuse, coercion, social distance, personal malaise, pardonResumen.A través de dos estudios, la presente investigación analizar el proceso de perdón ante una situación de abuso psicológico, en función de la distancia social en relación con la persona que transgrede. En el primer estudio (n = 145), se examinó el otorgamiento de perdón ante diferentes tipos de violencia (física vs. psicológica). Los resultados mostraron que la violencia psicológica en mayor grado (vs. física). En el segundo estudio (n = 155) se analizó el perdón, el malestar o distrés personal y la coacción como respuesta de afrontamiento, en función de la distancia social (actor vs. observador). Los resultados evidenciaron que, el malestar personal se relaciona con un menor perdón, y éste a su vez, se relaciona con una menor coerción, especialmente en la condición de actor (observador). Asimismo, los resultados también evidenciaron que el perdón media la relación entre el malestar personal y la resolución de coerción, especialmente, cuando se trata de la perspectiva del actor.Palabras clave: Abuso psicológico, coacción, distancia social, malestar personal, perdón
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Cosgrove, Lisa, and Varda Konstam. "Forgiveness and Forgetting: Clinical Implications for Mental Health Counselors." Journal of Mental Health Counseling 30, no. 1 (January 1, 2008): 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.17744/mehc.30.1.r1h1250015728274.

Full text
Abstract:
Although mental health professionals have attempted to specify the meaning of forgiveness, lack of consensus exists. Despite the lack of consensus over the meaning of forgiveness, there is agreement that forgiving is not forgetting or pardoning. However, the relationship between forgiving and forgetting has been undertheorized, and as a result, this relationship has not been empirically investigated. In this paper, we suggest that it would be fruitful to assess the meaning systems individuals associate with the definition of forgiveness. Focusing on the lived experience of individuals may help researchers and counselors avoid unhelpful dichotomizations such as "authentic vs. inauthentic" forgiveness. Implications for both research and mental health counseling are discussed.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Patel, Mitesh S., David A. Asch, Roy Rosin, Dylan S. Small, Scarlett L. Bellamy, Karen Hoffer, David Shuttleworth, et al. "Framing Social Comparison Feedback With Financial Incentives for Physical Activity Promotion: A Randomized Trial." Journal of Physical Activity and Health 17, no. 6 (June 1, 2020): 641–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2019-0313.

Full text
Abstract:
Background: Social comparison feedback is often used in physical activity interventions but the optimal design of feedback is unknown. Methods: This 4-arm, randomized trial consisted of a 13-week intervention period and 13-week follow-up period. During the intervention, 4-person teams were entered into a weekly lottery valued at about $1.40/day and contingent on the team averaging ≥7000 steps per day. Social comparison feedback on performance was delivered weekly for 26 weeks, and varied by reference point (50th vs 75th percentile) and forgiveness in use of activity data (all 7 d or best 5 of 7 d). The primary outcome was the mean proportion of participant-days achieving the 7000-step goal. Results: During the intervention period, the unadjusted mean proportion of participant-days that the goal was achieved was 0.47 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.38 to 0.56) in the 50th percentile arm, 0.38 (95% CI: 0.30 to 0.37) in the 75th percentile arm, 0.40 (95% CI: 0.31 to 0.49) in the 50th percentile with forgiveness arm, and 0.47 (95% CI: 0.38 to 0.55) in the 75th percentile with forgiveness arm. In adjusted models during the intervention and follow-up periods, there were no significant differences between arms. Conclusions: Changing social comparison feedback did not impact physical activity.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Park, Kiwan, Yaeri Kim, and Seojin Stacey Lee. "THE ASYMMETRIC FORGIVENESS TOWARD BRAND STATUS (UNDERDOG VS. TOP-DOG) UPON BRAND CRISIS TYPES (RELATIONAL CRISIS VS. NON-RELATIONAL CRISIS)." Global Fashion Management Conference 2018 (July 30, 2018): 547. http://dx.doi.org/10.15444/gmc2018.05.02.03.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Hassey, Roseann Viscomi. "How brand personality and failure-type shape consumer forgiveness." Journal of Product & Brand Management 28, no. 2 (March 11, 2019): 300–315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jpbm-09-2017-1563.

Full text
Abstract:
PurposeThis paper aims to explore the impact of an overlooked variable, brand personality, as a basis for brand forgiveness and recovery following brand failures.Design/methodology/approachData were collected via three on-line surveys using Amazon Mechanical Turk, including a total of 475 respondents (125, 113 and 237) and using a 2 × 2 between-subjects factorial design.FindingsResults show that a brand’s dominant personality (warm vs competent) elicits different expectations regarding brand performance, and that surprisingly, consumers more readily forgive, rather than censure, brand failures which violate their expectations. Further, this effect exists independent of the consumer’s relationship with the brand. These findings occur across different brands (both fictitious and real), manipulations of brand personality and brand failure-type and indices for brand forgiveness. Results indicate the interactive effect of brand personality and failure-type was mediated by brand credibility, while consumers’ desire to re-evaluate the brand served as a moderator.Practical implicationsThis research demonstrates that while brand failures are largely considered from a negative perspective, brand personality can serve to bolster consumer perceptions of brands post-failure. Further, and separate from strong consumer-brand relationships, brand personality serves as an important signal for consumer expectations and plays a pivotal role in post-failure forgiveness and behavioral intentions.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the literature by introducing and testing the role brand personality plays, independent of an existing and strong consumer-brand relationship, in consumer response to brand failure. Further, the mediator of and a moderator for this effect are identified.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Joo, Bo Ra, and Hye-Young Kim. "Repositioning luxury fashion brands as intentional agents: the roles of consumer envy and admiration." Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal 25, no. 4 (January 15, 2021): 606–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jfmm-06-2019-0135.

Full text
Abstract:
PurposeBuilding on the Brands as Intentional Agents Framework (BIAF), the aim of this study is to demonstrate the effectiveness of social media marketing (SMM) as a tool to communicate luxury fashion brands' good intentions toward the general public.Design/methodology/approachA sample of 488 US female consumers was used to test a conceptual model delineating the sequential linkages from luxury fashion brands' intentions to brand emotions (i.e. envy vs admiration) and to consumer–brand relationships (i.e. emotional brand attachment and brand forgiveness). Structural equation modeling (SEM) was performed to test the measurement and structural models.FindingsThe results indicated that luxury fashion brands' “populist” intentions had a positive impact on consumer admiration. Both consumer envy and admiration had positive effects on emotional brand attachment and brand forgiveness. However, admiration had a stronger effect than envy on these relational consumer responses.Originality/valueThis study identified that luxury fashion brands, frequently stereotyped as exclusive, can become brands admired by mass-market consumers by expressing warmth on social media. Drawing on social psychological perspectives and the BIAF, this study adds to the literature on luxury brands' social media communication by demonstrating the effectiveness of brand warmth to induce consumers' strong relational outcomes.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Forgiveness vs"

1

Goldie, Miranda Mae. "Infidelity and Forgiveness: Therapists' Views on Reconciliation and Restoration of Trust Following Disclosure of Infidelity." BYU ScholarsArchive, 2013. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/3834.

Full text
Abstract:
Infidelity is one of the most prevalent presenting problems in relational therapy. There are many conceptualizations of the healing process following infidelity and suggested interventions and treatment plans. Forgiveness is an essential part of relationship growth and healing interpersonal hurts. Reconciliation is relationship repair that can accompany forgiveness. In addition, restoring trust is essential to reconciliation. Means to accomplish rebuilding trust must be established. This study seeks to expand understanding of the treatment of infidelity specifically on the topics of forgiveness, reconciliation, and restoration of trust through disclosure. The Forgiveness vs. Reconciliation and Trust Scale (FvRTS) was developed as a measure for therapists' views and perception concerning these three topics. Through statistical analysis of the FvRTS, which was administered to relational therapists, this study investigates the views and opinions held by therapists concerning the relationship between reconciliation and forgiveness and the role of disclosure, both initial and ongoing, in restoring trust following infidelity. Therapists conveyed the view that reconciliation is not required for forgiveness. However, in their practice they encourage reconciliation following an affair. Results indicated that therapists perceive initial disclosure as having immediate negative impacts. But overall, therapists expressed a strong view that both initial and ongoing disclosure have a positive long term impact on relational healing.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Forgiveness vs"

1

"Pity vs. Forgiveness in Pagan and Judaeo-Christian Narratives." In Cultural Crossroads in the Ancient Novel, 305–14. De Gruyter, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9781501503986-023.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Forgiveness vs' for particular source types:
Journal articles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography