Academic literature on the topic 'Fragment specific fixation'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Fragment specific fixation.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Fragment specific fixation"

1

Hozack, Bryan A., and Rick J. Tosti. "Fragment-Specific Fixation in Distal Radius Fractures." Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine 12, no. 2 (2019): 190–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12178-019-09538-6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Medoff, Robert J. "Fragment-Specific Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures." Atlas of the Hand Clinics 11, no. 2 (2006): 163–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahc.2006.06.004.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Lee, Steve K., and Sonia Chaudhry. "Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Through Fracture Fragment Specific Fixation Methods." Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics 19, no. 2 (2009): 70–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.oto.2009.09.011.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Bilinsky, P. I., V. P. But, and T. E. Marthuk. "Limited contact multiplane osteosynthesis of shinbone fractures." Paediatric Surgery. Ukraine, no. 3(84) (September 28, 2024): 95–98. https://doi.org/10.15574/ps.2024.3(84).9598.

Full text
Abstract:
Aim - to improve the results of treatment of shinbone fractures with limited contact multiplane osteosynthesis device, to investigate its fixation capabilities. Materials and methods. On the base of systemic approach, conceptual substantiation, theoretic methods of mathematic and computer modeling a new method of limited contact multiplane osteosynthesis of diaphyseal shinbone fractures (SBF) and device for its realization were developed. Comparative analysis of fixing capabilities of the developed device and full-contact plate was performed by means of finite element method. Stress-strain state of the “fixative-bone” system of different fixation methods of SBF was investigated. Results. Theoretic data about the size of the micromobility of bone fragments depending on the fracture line pattern, imposed force, specific features of the fixative construction were obtained. Stressed state of plates, its dependence from fixative construction, fracture pattern, load size was studied. Influence of reposition stabilization of fragments by screws in oblique and comminuted fractures on fixation rigidity, micromotion of fragments, stress of fixative construction elements and bone fragments was investigated. Fragment fusion was noted in all 380 patients with SBF operated on with a limited contact osteosynthesis device. Conclusions. The developed device for limited contact multiplane osteosynthesis of shinbone fractures and the method of its application simplifies surgical intervention, minimises trauma to the fragments, and ensures their stable fixation and optimal conditions for fusion. No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Mahajan, Rahul, Nitin Choudhary, Sanjeev Gupta, and Neeraj Mahajan. "TRIMALLEOLARFRACTURES :- FRAGMENT SPECIFIC FIXATION AND ITS FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES." International Journal of Advanced Research 10, no. 05 (2022): 1295–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/ijar01/14849.

Full text
Abstract:
Trimalleolar fractures are disabling injuries if not managed properly. Clinical and functional outcomes oftrimalleolar fracture are worse as compared to bimalleolar fractures not involving the posterior malleolus. Various surgical approaches and techniques to reduce and fix these fractures described in the literature.In this case study of 11 patients with trimalleolar fractures, a posterolateral approach was used for fixation of posterior malleolus as well as lateral malleolus in all the cases. A preoperative CT scan was done in all the cases. The Olerud and Molendar scoring system was used to assess the functional outcome.The average age of patients was 52.6 years. The most common mode of sustaining injury was twisting of the ankle joint (n = 7). The average time to union and full weight-bearing was 12 weeks (range 10–14 weeks). An excellent functional outcome in 6 patients and a good outcome in 5 patients were obtained at the end of 12 months of follow-up. No significant complications were encountered. The posterolateral approach provides good exposure to fix both posterior and lateral malleolus via single incision. Stable fixation of posterior malleolus plays a vital role in obtaining good clinical and functional outcomes.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Bae, Donald S., and Mark J. Koris. "Fragment-Specific Internal Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures." Hand Clinics 21, no. 3 (2005): 355–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hcl.2005.04.007.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Santosh, Veershetty Patil, Madan Mohan Rao GV, and Sagare Kavyashree. "Fragment Specific Fracture Fixation in the Management of Communited Intra Articular Distal Radius Fractures: An Assessment of Functional Outcome." International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Review and Research 14, no. 04 (2022): 163–69. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12657942.

Full text
Abstract:
Introduction: Distal radius fractures are typical high energy trauma injuries, and theirtreatment is impacted by parameters such as fracture stability, displacement, and patientcharacteristics. Fragment-specific fixation can be an effective treatment option for distalradius fractures. The purpose of this study was to assess the therapy of communited intraarticular distal radius fractures using a fragment specific fracture fixation approach.Material and Methods: Thirty-one cases with communited distal radius fractures above 21years of age were recruited. Based on Medoff fracture classification, all the fractures weretreated with fragment specific fracture fixation. Postoperative follow up was conducted onthe end of 3rd week, 6th week, 3rd month, 6th month and end of 12th month and then until thecomplete closure of fractures. The functional outcome of fracture was assessed by Gartlandand Werley scoring system.Results: Majority cases had fracture union duration 8 weeks (54.84%) followed by 10 weeks(32.26%). According to Gartland and Werley score, 70.96% had score 0, 9.68% had score 2,6.45% had core 3 and score 4. The excellent (0-2) functional outcome was observed in90.32%, good (3-8) in 6.45% and fair (9-20) in 3.23% of cases.Conclusion: Fragment specific fracture fixation was an efficient treatment modality forCommunited intraarticular distal radius fractures.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

O’Shaughnessy, Maureen A., Alexander Y. Shin, and Sanjeev Kakar. "Volar Marginal Rim Fracture Fixation With Volar Fragment-Specific Hook Plate Fixation." Journal of Hand Surgery 40, no. 8 (2015): 1563–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.04.021.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Cheah, A. "Volar Marginal Rim Fracture Fixation With Volar Fragment-Specific Hook Plate Fixation." Yearbook of Hand and Upper Limb Surgery 2016 (2016): 234–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhls.2016.04.068.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Clark, Sonja, and William Geissler. "Fragment-Specific Fixation for Fractures of the Distal Radius." Journal of Wrist Surgery 05, no. 01 (2016): 022–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1571186.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Fragment specific fixation"

1

Fracol, Megan, Jennifer Bai, and Jason H. Ko. "Fragment-Specific Distal Radius Fixation." In Fractures of the Wrist. Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74293-5_8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Brown, Daniel J. "Fragment-Specific Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures." In Wrist and Elbow Arthroscopy with Selected Open Procedures. Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78881-0_38.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Mlynarek, Ryan A., and Jeffrey N. Lawton. "Fragment-Specific Internal Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures." In Distal Radius Fractures. Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27489-8_7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Benson, Leon S., and Robert J. Medoff. "Fragment-Specific Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures." In Fractures and Injuries of the Distal Radius and Carpus. Elsevier, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-4160-4083-5.00014-7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Fragment specific fixation"

1

Hazlett, Lauren, Gabriella Becker, Allyn Calvis, Mary Verzi, and Manish Paliwal. "Design of Bioabsorbable Polymeric Humeral Fracture Fixation Device." In ASME 2014 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/imece2014-39743.

Full text
Abstract:
Approximately 55,500 proximal humeral fractures require surgical fixation annually. The current standard for internal humeral fracture fixation involves implantation of rigid metallic devices to prevent dislocation of bone fragments. However, these devices have high stiffness characteristics which can cause stress shielding in bone. A second method of fixation, called biological fixation, decreases stiffness which reduces stress shielding by utilizing more flexible devices. This approach tends leads to increased incidences of delayed healing and nonunion of fracture fragments. Therefore, this device design implements two bioabsorbable polymers in two distinct layers that degrade at different rates. The purpose of this design is to provide rigid fixation during the initial fracture healing phase followed by a period of biological fixation, allowing for functional healing along with a reduction in stress shielding over time compared to current devices. The bioabsorbable property permits the device to remain in situ, thus eliminating the need for removal surgery and reducing the risk of surgical site infection. Using finite element analysis, the design has been demonstrated to exhibit varying axial, torsional, and flexural stiffness over time. The final device was fabricated by injection molding, and tested for flexural stiffness. In addition, the polymers were tested for stiffness at specific time intervals over the course of the degradation period. All stiffness tests were performed under simple three point loads. A Nikon 3200 camera (Nikon Inc., Melville, NY) was used to sequentially image the material samples and plate throughout each load application. The flexural stiffness of the device was determined by utilizing Digital Image Correlation analysis in Matlab (MathWorks, Inc.) to analyze surface displacements between image frames. The success of the device was determined by comparing the observed difference in stiffness to standard stiffness values for humeral fixation devices currently available on the market. A substantial decrease in stiffness combines the benefits of rigid and biological fixation devices as well as eliminates the complications associated with each, providing an improved solution for proximal humeral fractures.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!