Academic literature on the topic 'French copyright law'

Makeen, Makeen Fouad. Copyright in a global information society: The scope of copyright protection under international, US, UK, and French law. Kluwer Law International, 2000.

Before copyright: The French book-privilege system, 1498-1526. Cambridge University Press, 1990.

The French booktrade and the "permission simple" of 1777: Copyright and public domain, with an edition of the permit registers. Voltaire Foundation at the Taylor Institution, 1992.

France. Convention between the government of the United States of America and the government of the French Republic for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income and capital: Message from the President of the United States transmitting convention between the government of the United States of America and the government of the French Republic for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income and capital, signed at Paris on August 31, 1994, together with two related exchanges of notes. U.S. G.P.O., 1994.

France. Convention between the government of the United States of America and the government of the French Republic for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income and capital: Message from the President of the United States transmitting convention between the government of the United States of America and the government of the French Republic for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income and capital, signed at Paris on August 31, 1994, together with two related exchanges of notes. U.S. G.P.O., 1994.

France. Convention between the government of the United States of America and the government of the French Republic for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income and capital: Message from the President of the United States transmitting convention between the government of the United States of America and the government of the French Republic for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income and capital, signed at Paris on August 31, 1994, together with two related exchanges of notes. U.S. G.P.O., 1994.

France. Protocol amending the tax convention with France: Message from the President of the United States transmitting Protocol Amending the Convention between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the French Republic for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income and Capital, signed at Paris on August 31, 1994. U.S. G.P.O., 2005.

France. Protocol amending the tax convention with France: Message from the President of the United States transmitting Protocol Amending the Convention between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the French Republic for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income and Capital, signed at Paris on August 31, 1994. U.S. G.P.O., 2005.

France. Protocol to the 1967 Tax Convention with France: Message from the President of the United States transmitting the protocol of June 16, 1988, together with a related exchange of notes, to the convention between the United States of America and the French Republic with respect to taxes on income and property of July 28, 1967, as amended by the protocols of October 12, 1970, and November 24, 1978 and January 17, 1984. U.S. G.P.O., 1988.

France. Protocol to the 1967 Tax Convention with France: Message from the President of the United States transmitting the protocol of June 16, 1988, together with a related exchange of notes, to the convention between the United States of America and the French Republic with respect to taxes on income and property of July 28, 1967, as amended by the protocols of October 12, 1970, and November 24, 1978 and January 17, 1984. U.S. G.P.O., 1988.

Binctin, Nicolas. "The French Copyright Law Opens Its Arms to the FOSS." In Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law. Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21560-0_9.

Segoin, Daniel. "Rationales and litigation strategy of the French government before the CJEU in copyright cases." In The Routledge Handbook of EU Copyright Law. Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003156277-29.

Fauchart, Emmanuelle, and Eric Von Hippel. "Norms-Based Intellectual Property Systems." In Creativity without Law. NYU Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479841936.003.0002.

Roust, Colin. "New Beginnings in the Post-War Years." In Georges Auric. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190607777.003.0007.

Karapapa, Stavroula. "Introduction." In Defences to Copyright Infringement. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198795636.003.0001.

"from one Convention country should be treated in other convention countries just the same as the nationals of that country. In other words, a French author should enjoy the same copyright protection in the UK as a British author. For industrial property, the Paris Convention imposes the same requirement of national treatment:." In Sourcebook on Intellectual Property Law. Routledge-Cavendish, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781843142928-15.

"construing the Berne Convention to say that all that was required was a positive right to claim authorship which the author may exercise as he wishes. Normally this will be by placing his name on copies of the work. The Green Paper noted that s 43 of the 1956 Act provided a useful remedy where the plaintiff is not a professional writer and could not therefore recover damages for loss of goodwill in a passing off action; the provision survives as s 84 of the 1988 Act. The Berne Convention also contains some latitude as to the right of integrity since Article 6 bis requires a right to object in cases only where actions in relation to an author’s work would be prejudicial to his honour or reputation. The government agreed with Whitford that exceptions such as the permitting of reasonable modifications (as in the Netherlands Copyright Act) should be made and that they would be in accordance with the Berne Convention. The Green Paper therefore proposed that the legislation should provide that no change should be made in any literary, dramatic, musical, artistic or cinematographic work without the author’s consent, with the exception of changes to which the author could not in good faith refuse consent. The Act embraces this principle by implication, not expressly, as it adopts the wording of the Berne Convention rather than that of the Green Paper. The Green Paper went on to propose that the rights would be exerciseable only by the author or, after his death, by his personal representative. Contravention of the rights would be actionable as a breach of statutory duty. The rights would not be assignable. However, the author would be permitted to waive his moral rights and such waiver would be binding on his successors in title. The moral rights would exist for the same period as economic rights. The White Paper promised legislation along the lines foreshadowed in the Green Paper, noting that while Whitford had doubted whether UK law had complied with the Brussels text of the Berne Convention, there was no doubt that amendment of the law was necessary to comply with the Paris text. Chapter 4 of the Act sets out the new rights. The rights to be protected are the minimum required to be protected by Berne – paternity and integrity. There is no equivalent to the French droit de divulgation (the right to control circulation of a work prior to its being completed for publication), the droit d’accès (mainly of artists to their paintings after sale), the droit de repentir (the right of withdrawal after publication, subject in German law to the payment of compensation to the publisher, of a work of which its author no longer approves). Nor is there a right to reacquire a work of which the author has disposed – such as Graham Sutherland might have found useful in the case of his portrait of Churchill – or a right of publication. The possibility of." In Sourcebook on Intellectual Property Law. Routledge-Cavendish, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781843142928-70.

Rudic, Gheorghe. "Education from the Enlightenment to the Globalization." In Handbook of Research on Applied Learning Theory and Design in Modern Education. IGI Global, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-9634-1.ch001.

Woodcock, Leone E., and San Murugesan. "Gender Differences in Ethics Perceptions in Information Technology." In Information Security and Ethics. IGI Global, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-937-3.ch230.