Dissertations / Theses on the topic 'Friedman, Milton'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 17 dissertations / theses for your research on the topic 'Friedman, Milton.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse dissertations / theses on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
Cherrier, Béatrice. "Valeurs et théorisation économique chez Gunnar Myrdal, Jacob Marschak, et Milton Friedman." Paris 10, 2008. http://www.theses.fr/2008PA100116.
Full textThis dissertation deals with the relationships between economists’ scientific activities and their private values. Their re-examination is made necessary by the technical evolutions within economic science from the thirties on, which increased economists’ claim for objectivity in spite of their growing proximity with the political process. With the help of three case studies based on archive research, we show how values enter the theorizing process, survive an increasingly technically demanding process of confrontation with facts, and are used in the definition of economic policies. The examples of Gunnar Myrdal, Jacob Marschak and Milton Friedman prove that the relationships between science and values are neither simple nor unilateral, and that it is impossible to separate clearly political values from beliefs on the world as it is (that is, cognitive values). We thus study how these two types of values interact within the economist’s worldview, where contradictions, dilemmas or mutual reinforcement between private and scientific beliefs take place. We also show that methodological choices are crucial for the links between values and science, since they can act as a shield against values or, on the contrary, as their channel into science. We finally demonstrate that private beliefs are necessary to the definition of economic policy and that our three economists think that their political beliefs are scientifically based, which results in a merging between the two strands of thinking
Nascimento, Pedro Henrique 1983. "Dinheiro e política monetária : Friedman x Davidson." [s.n.], 2014. http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/286429.
Full textDissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Economia
Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-25T08:23:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Nascimento_PedroHenrique_M.pdf: 1343329 bytes, checksum: cacd0c4e0f520e75d5c910358ba0be42 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014
Resumo: Este trabalho examina os principais pontos de divergência entre os economistas Milton Friedman e Paul Davidson no que se refere ao papel da moeda, assim como a condução de suas políticas monetárias. O ponto de partida para essa análise é o fascinante debate de ideias entre os autores ocorrido no início da década de 1970 sobre o arcabouço teórico desenvolvido por Friedman, o qual prometia sepultar de uma vez por todas qualquer conflito entre economistas clássicos e "keynesianos". Embora o objetivo do monetarista tenha sido eliminar essas divergências, estas ficaram ainda mais evidentes a partir do debate direto entre os autores, deixando claro que o consenso entre eles nos moldes apresentados pelo debate não seria possível. Nesse sentido, o trabalho propõe um método alternativo para solucionar essa "disputa", ao apresentar o argumento de Sheila Dow, o qual sugere que as diferenças entre os economistas são resultado de suas também distintas posições metodológicas, as quais trazem implícitas as diferentes "visões de mundo" dos autores. Essas diferenças metodológicas são, portanto, a chave para compreender como Friedman e Davidson puderam atingir resultados tão contrastantes sobre dinheiro e política monetária
Abstract: This paper examines the main points of divergence between the economists Milton Friedman and Paul Davidson regarding the role of the money, as well as the conduct of their monetary policies. The starting point for this analysis is the fascinating debate of ideas among authors occurred at the beginning of the 1970s on the theoretical framework developed by Friedman, which promised bury once and for all any conflict between economists and classic "Keynesian". Although the objective of monetary policy has been to eliminate these differences, these were even more evident from the direct discussion between the authors, making it clear that the consensus between them in the manner presented by debate would not be possible. In this sense, the paper proposes an alternative method to resolve this "dispute", presenting the argument of Sheila Dow, which suggests that the differences between the economists are the result of their also distinct methodological positions, which brings the implied different "world views" of authors. These methodological differences are, therefore, the key to understanding how Friedman and Davidson could achieve results so contrasting on money and monetary policy
Mestrado
Teoria Economica
Mestre em Ciências Econômicas
Dahlin, Rickard. "Korrelationen mellan kostnad och resultat." Thesis, Uppsala universitet, Institutionen för pedagogik, didaktik och utbildningsstudier, 2017. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-313213.
Full textNiamkey, Amlam M. "La politique monétaire et la stagflation : les points de vue de Milton Friedman et de Friedrich A. Hayek." Clermont-Ferrand 1, 1985. http://www.theses.fr/1985CLF1D037.
Full textKraft, Michael Gerhard. "Ökonomie zwischen Wissenschaft und Ethik : eine dogmenhistorische Untersuchung von Léon M. E. Walras bis Milton Friedmann /." Frankfurt am Main [u.a.] : Lang, 2005. http://www.gbv.de/dms/ilmenau/toc/497325365kraft.PDF.
Full textFerreira, Fran?ois de Oliveira. "Da crise do estado ? democracia como alvo: Observa??es sobre o neoliberalismo a partir de Friedrich Hayek e Milton Friedman." Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, 2009. http://repositorio.ufrn.br:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/13557.
Full textThe neoliberalism proclaims the crisis of the State in front of globalization , but, approaching two books taken as basic on this theoretical chain - The road to serfdom, of Friedrich Hayek, and Capitalism and Freedom, of Milton Friedman - to analyze this supposed dualism, the conclusion into which we arrive is another one. Remembering liberal tradition and quickly, later, analyzing critically the workmanships, can be perceived that others are the conflicts really gifts in the current capitalist reality - market versus State et capitalism versus democracy - and, from the understanding on the reading made and the theoretical trajectory of its authors, we may see as the neoliberalism locates itself in relation to these conflicts, which polar regions of these antagonisms privileges, what represents the State for itself, and what it intends as much more global philosophy than economic/politics thinking only
O neoliberalismo apregoa a crise do Estado diante da globaliza??o , mas, abordando dois livros tidos como fundamentais dessa corrente te?rica O caminho da servid?o, de Friedrich Hayek, e Capitalismo e Liberdade, de Milton Friedman para analisar essa suposta dualidade, a conclus?o a que chegamos ? outra. Recuperada rapidamente a tradi??o liberal e, depois, analisadas criticamente essas obras, pode-se perceber que outros s?o os conflitos realmente presentes na realidade capitalista atual mercado versus Estado et capitalismo versus democracia e, a partir da compreens?o sobre a leitura efetuada e a trajet?ria te?rica de seus autores, v?-se como o neoliberalismo se posiciona em rela??o a esses conflitos, que p?los desses antagonismos privilegia, o que representa o Estado para si, e o que pretende ele como filosofia muito mais totalizante do que meramente econ?mica/pol?tica
Kontzler, Hélène. "Une mise en perspective historique et analytique de l'offre de monnaie : Hayek, Friedman et Lucas." Paris 1, 2005. http://www.theses.fr/2005PA010023.
Full textBalling, Stephan [Verfasser], and Michael [Akademischer Betreuer] Zöller. "Sozialphilosophie und Geldpolitik bei Friedrich August von Hayek, Walter Eucken, Joseph Alois Schumpeter, Milton Friedman und John Maynard Keynes / Stephan Balling. Betreuer: Michael Zöller." Bayreuth : Universität Bayreuth, 2013. http://d-nb.info/1059353598/34.
Full textSaisekar, Avantika. "Did Consumers Really Change Their Consumption Habits After the 2008 Recession? A Look into Consumer Expenditure Using Milton Friedman's Permanent Income Hypothesis." Scholarship @ Claremont, 2012. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/508.
Full textComisarow, Carol A. "The relative stability of monetary velocity and the investment multiplier : a replication of the Friedman-Meiselman study /." Thesis, This resource online, 1990. http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-03242009-040611/.
Full textSonett, Alexandra. "A Promise is a Promise: The Ethical Implications for CEO’s Acting Socially Responsible within a Corporation." Scholarship @ Claremont, 2015. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/1182.
Full textRivera, González Juan Pablo. "La educación como un bien social autónomo. Pensamiento de Michael Walzer y ensayo de aplicación al sistema neoliberal chileno." Tesis, Universidad de Chile, 2014. http://www.repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/129782.
Full textAutor no autoriza el acceso a texto completo de su documento
La presente memoria se compone de dos grandes capítulos y una reflexión final. El primer capítulo consiste en un análisis general de una obra esencial para la filosofía política contemporánea como lo es “Las Esferas de la Justicia” (1983) del profesor estadounidense Michael Walzer. Se comienza contextualizando dicha obra en base a tres corrientes de pensamiento: el liberalismo, el neoliberalismo, y el comunitarismo. Luego, se exhibe llanamente la concepción del autor acerca de ideales como la justicia, el pluralismo y la igualdad. Especialmente, se estudia la esfera de la justicia referida a la educación, concebida por Walzer como un bien social autónomo y cuyos muros deben impedir la injerencia de factores externos, tales como el dinero o el poder. ¿Cómo se plantea la tiranía en la esfera de la educación? ¿Cuál es el papel de la escuela en una sociedad democrática? Interrogantes de este tipo son las que se pretende responder basándonos en el libro ya referido. El segundo capítulo apunta a examinar los criterios ideológicos neoliberales fundantes – especialmente debidos a Friedman- del actual sistema educacional chileno, implantados por la dictadura militar de Pinochet. La reflexión final intentará relacionar ambos capítulos afirmando la tesis que en Chile la “Esfera de la Educación” en todos sus tramos – básica, media y superior- se rige eminentemente bajo cánones mercantiles, creando serias desigualdades sociales, notoria segregación e individuos profundamente carentes de formación ciudadana; todos elementos ajenos a una democracia. Se concluye que el sistema educativo actual opera como un simple reproductor del sistema de clases sociales, tanto teórica, como empíricamente. Urge entonces adherirse como sociedad a una concepción de la educación como un bien social autónomo, inclusive más allá de la concepción liberal de derecho humano social
Kovanda, Lukáš. "Finanční krize a metodologie ekonomie." Doctoral thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2007. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-196930.
Full textKraft, Michael Gerhard. "Ökonomie im Spannungsfeld von Wissenschaft und Ethik. Eine dogmenhistorische Untersuchung von Léon M.E. Walras bis Milton Friedman." Thesis, 2004. http://epub.wu.ac.at/1883/1/document.pdf.
Full textAckroyd, Vaughan Richard. "Commercial and Business Incorporation: Enhancing the notion of corporation to include an ethical statement." Thesis, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/10012/3503.
Full textSanterre, Chantal. "La problématique de la justice fiscale : le cas du Québec." Mémoire, 2010. http://www.archipel.uqam.ca/2923/1/M11403.pdf.
Full textWang, Yueh-Ching, and 王月卿. "A Study of How Taiwan’s Intellectuals See Milton Friedman’s Voucher Plan." Thesis, 2004. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/10401148893178873621.
Full text臺北市立師範學院
國民教育研究所
92
The purpose of the study was to analyze the problem caused by the way Taiwan introduced ideologies from the western world. Since Taiwan has a lot to learn from the West, the way of learning is important. Therefore, the study was attempting to find out the better means of introducing the western ideologies to the domestic. In order to figure it out, the author of this thesis studied the case of how Taiwan’s intellectuals saw Milton Friedman’s voucher plan. The first part of this essay started from reading two books written by Milton Friedman, namely, Capitalism and Freedom and Free to Choose. This step helped to understand Friedman’s educational ideas and the voucher plan he proposed fifty years ago for dealing with USA’s educational problems. For the next part, the author went on to analyze how Taiwan’s intellectuals, especially economists and educationists, saw the voucher plan. Based upon the accounts given in the first two parts, certain features of Taiwan’s introducing voucher plan were then described. According to the study, two suggestions were made. First, it was suggested that Taiwan’s intellectuals should pay more attention to the issues concerning how the ideologies under consideration developed and the subsequent controversies surrounding them. Second, it was suggested that scholars should keep policy makers informed as far as decision-making was concerned.