Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Full-field digital mammography (FFDM)

Contents

Journal articles

Academic literature on the topic 'Full-field digital mammography (FFDM)'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 7 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Full-field digital mammography (FFDM).'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Full-field digital mammography (FFDM)"

1

Destounis, Stamatia, Andrea Arieno, and Renee Morgan. "Initial Experience with Combination Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Plus Full Field Digital Mammography or Full Field Digital Mammography Alone in the Screening Environment." Journal of Clinical Imaging Science 4 (February 25, 2014): 9. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2156-7514.127838.

Full text

Abstract:

Objectives: Initial review of patients undergoing screening mammography imaged with a combination of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus full field digital mammography (FFDM) compared with FFDM alone. Materials and Methods: From June 2011 to December 2011, all patients presenting for routine screening mammography were offered a combination DBT plus FFDM exam. Under institutional review board approval, we reviewed 524 patients who opted for combination DBT plus FFDM and selected a sample group of 524 FFDM screening exams from the same time period for a comparative analysis. The χ2 (Chi-squa

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Bansal, Gaurav J., Iain Lyburn, and Thomas Jones. "Is full field digital mammography equivalent in performance to screen film mammography? UK perspective." International Journal of Diagnostic Imaging 1, no. 2 (2014): 106. http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/ijdi.v1n2p106.

Full text

Abstract:

Aim: The purpose of this project was to compare the performance of full-field digital imaging (FFDM) with screen film mammography (SFM). Methods: Data from 24,876 and 32,142 women in SFM and FFDM group respectively was collected retrospectively and comparison was made of the recall rate, breast cancer detection rate and positive predictive value (PPV) for the recalls for the two screening modalities, screen film mammography (SFM) and full field digital mammography (FFDM). Difference in radiologic characteristics of the tumours and tumour type (Ductal carcinoma in situ {DCIS} versus invasive) w

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Ishii, Mie, Mai Nakamura, Rie Ishii, et al. "Effect of Compression Force and Target or Target/Filter Combination on Mean Glandular Dose for Japanese Women in Full-Field Digital Mammography System." Journal of Medical Imaging and Health Informatics 11, no. 10 (2021): 2695–700. http://dx.doi.org/10.1166/jmihi.2021.3862.

Full text

Abstract:

We constructed a mammography database of 807 Japanese women and 2,772 images obtained using five commercial full-field digital mammography (FFDM) devices at four different facilities. Five types of mammography devices fabricated by four manufacturers were used: one with a Mo target (AMULET F), one with Mo and Rh targets (Senographe DS), one with Mo and W targets (AMULET), and two with a W target (MAMMOMAT Fusion and Selenia Dimensions). The purpose of this study was to focus on the mean glandular dose (MGD) in the database and analyze the difference in the MGD of Japanese women radiographed by

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Judge, Michael, Elizabeth Keavey, and Niall Phelan. "Scatter Radiation Intensities about Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) Units." Physica Medica 28, no. 4 (2012): 339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2012.06.028.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Skaane, P., A. Skjennald, K. Young, et al. "Follow-up and final results of the oslo I study comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading." Acta Radiologica 46, no. 7 (2005): 679–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02841850500223547.

Full text

Abstract:

Purpose: To compare cancer detection rates of screen-film (SFM) and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) with soft-copy reading in a screening program including the initial positive scores for interval cancers and cancers in the subsequent screening round, and to analyze the false-negative FFDM interpretations. Material and Methods: Using a paired study design, 3683 women underwent SFM and FFDM in a population-based screening program. Two standard views of each breast were acquired. The images were interpreted without previous films for comparison. Independent double reading using a 5-point r

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Asbeutah, Akram Mahmoud, and Ajit Brindhaban. "Comparison between Recorded and Measured Radiation Doses in Diagnostic Full-field Digital Mammography: A Phantom Study." Journal of Clinical Imaging Science 10 (November 13, 2020): 73. http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/jcis_188_2020.

Full text

Abstract:

Objectives: There are concerns regarding the difference between directly recorded and measured entrance skin dose (ESD) and average glandular dose (AGD) in full-field digital mammography (FFDM). The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of different exposure parameters on ESD and AGD recorded directly and measured from an FFDM unit using a phantom. Material and Methods: The ESD and AGD of 27 FFDM (craniocaudal [CC] projection) images of tissue-equivalent phantoms were acquired using a general electric (GE Senographe Essential) FFDM unit. The phantoms were used to simulate three dif

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Byun, Jieun, Jee Eun Lee, Eun Suk Cha, Jin Chung, and Jeoung Hyun Kim. "Visualization of Breast Microcalcifications on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and 2-Dimensional Digital Mammography Using Specimens." Breast Cancer: Basic and Clinical Research 11 (January 1, 2017): 117822341770338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1178223417703388.

Full text

Abstract:

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the visibility of microcalcifications of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) using breast specimens. Materials And Methods: Thirty-one specimens’ DBT and FFDM were retrospectively reviewed by four readers. Results: The image quality of microcalcifications of DBT was rated as superior or equivalent in 71.0% by reader 1, 67.8% by reader 2, 64.5% by reader 3, and 80.6% by reader 4. The Fleiss kappa statistic for agreement among readers was 0.31. Conclusions: We suggest that image quality of DBT appears to be

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Samardzic, Tatjana, Jon Lømo, and Per Skaane. "Screening-detected desmoid tumor of the breast: findings at conventional imaging and digital breast tomosynthesis." Acta Radiologica Open 7, no. 1 (2018): 205846011775203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2058460117752034.

Full text

Abstract:

Desmoid tumor of the breast is a rare benign entity that usually is mistaken for carcinoma clinically and radiologically. We report two cases of desmoid tumor of the breast detected by mammography screening using digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). The larger tumor was detected at both full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and DBT. The smaller desmoid tumor, however, was identified only at tomosynthesis. Mammographic and ultrasonographic findings at diagnostic work-up were consistent with carcinoma of the breast. Preoperative needle biopsies could not conclusively diagnose the lesions. Both pa

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Destounis, Stamatia V., Andrea L. Arieno, and Renee C. Morgan. "Preliminary Clinical Experience with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in the Visualization of Breast Microcalcifications." Journal of Clinical Imaging Science 3 (December 31, 2013): 65. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2156-7514.124099.

Full text

Abstract:

Objectives: To compare the visualization and image quality of microcalcifications imaged with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) versus conventional digital mammography. Materials and Methods: Patients with microcalcifications detected on full field digital mammography (FFDM) recommended for needle core biopsy were enrolled in the study after obtaining patient's consent and institutional review board approval (n = 177 patients, 179 lesions). All had a bilateral combination DBT exam, after undergoing routine digital mammography, prior to biopsy. The study radiologist reviewed the FFDM and DBT i

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Feeley, Linda, Donal Kiernan, Therese Mooney, et al. "Digital mammography in a screening programme and its implications for pathology: a comparative study." Journal of Clinical Pathology 64, no. 3 (2010): 215–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jcp.2010.085860.

Full text

Abstract:

AimsMost studies comparing full-field digital mammography (FFDM) with conventional screen-film mammography (SFM) have been radiology-based. The pathological implications of FFDM have received little attention in the literature, especially in the context of screening programmes. The primary objective of this retrospective study is to compare FFDM with SFM in a population-based screening programme with regard to a number of pathological parameters.MethodsDuring the study period, 107 818 women underwent screening mammograms with almost equal numbers obtained with each technique (49.9% with SFM vs

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

More sources

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!