To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Fyodor Ivanov.
Journal articles on the topic 'Fyodor Ivanov'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 20 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Fyodor Ivanov.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
Podosokorsky, Nikolay N. "Vyacheslav Ivanov, Researcher of Fyodor Dostoevsky." Dostoevsky and World Culture. Philological journal, no. 3 (2023): 233–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.22455/2619-0311-2023-3-233-246.
Full textAbstract:
The review is devoted to a new academic edition of the classic masterpiece by the eminent Russian poet and philosopher Vyacheslav Ivanov (1866–1949), titled Dostoevsky: Tragedy – Myth – Mysticism. Originally published in Germany in 1932 in German, this work stands out as a culminating achievement of Ivanov’s reflections about Dostoevsky, in which he summarized ideas and observations expressed by him earlier in articles of the 1910s and lectures of the 1920s. Ivanov considered Dostoevsky his spiritual teacher and was interested in him throughout all his life. The article offers a brief overview of the Russian edition released in 2021, highlighting the most relevant provisions of Vyacheslav Ivanov’s theory today. In particular, he can be considered one of the founders of the subject-subject method in philology, which in the 21st century is actively promoted in the field of Humanities by his spiritual follower Tatiana Kasatkina.
2
Anokhina, Yu Yu. "Female Characters in Fyodor Dostoevsky’s Novels in Interpretation of Vyacheslav Ivanov." Nauchnyi dialog 13, no. 4 (2024): 172–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-4-172-188.
Full textAbstract:
The article analyzes the works of Vyacheslav Ivanov on Fyodor Dostoevsky. Using the material from the book “Dostoevsky: Tragedy — Myth — Mysticism” (1932), the research principles and interpretive strategies implemented by Vyacheslav Ivanov in interpreting the female characters in Dostoevsky’s novels “Crime and Punishment,” “The Devils,” and “The Idiot” are identified. It is shown that Ivanov’s conception of the artistic features of characters such as Sonya Marmeladova, Alena Ivanovna, Maria Timofeevna, and Nastasya Filippovna are revealed in the context of the “main myth” of the works. The mythopoetic and functional aspects are highlighted as the most significant in Ivanov’s interpretations of the female characters. Additionally, it is argued that the psychological and spiritual characteristics of the heroines are not overlooked by the hermeneutist, as understanding the nuances of their inner world was necessary for him to reveal the mythopoetic functions. Through Ivanov’s interpretations of Dostoevsky’s female characters, it becomes evident that the poet-thinker’s approach to the writer’s works represents a synthesis of philosophical conceptualization and historical-literary perspective.
3
Abramova, Veronika I. "F.M. Dostoevky’s image in the Russian lyrics of the 19th – 20th centuries." Vestnik of Kostroma State University 28, no. 2 (2022): 147–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.34216/1998-0817-2022-28-2-147-154.
Full textAbstract:
The subject of research in this article includes Fyodor Dostoevsky’s image created in works of Russian 19th – 20th century poets (Konstantin Sluchevsky, Dmitry Merezhkovsky, Valery Bryusov, Sasha Chorny, Max Voloshin, Georgy Ivanov, Vladimir Mayakovsky, Nikolai Aseyev, Pavel Antokolsky, Boris Slutsky, Мikhail A. Svetlov, Yevgeny Rein, Yevgeny Yevtushenko, etc.). The genius image has not been examined by scientists in the aforesaid contexts so far. This determines the novelty of this research. Analysis of lyric texts, in which Fyodor Dostoevsky is mentioned, has allowed to identify the aspects of perception of the writer’s personality and works significant for the Russian culture, and to analyse the surname of Dostoevsky as a linguocultureme. The author set an aim to analyse the writer’s image components, to reveal their causes, to separate the stereotypic from the individual. Intertextual analysis, biographic, comparative, hermeneutical, imagological methods and continuous sampling are used in the work. As a result of the research the author comes to the following conclusions; Fyodor Dostoevsky’s image in the Russian lyrics of the 19th – 20th centuries includes the following elements: allusions to his works, references to the writer’s biography, inclusion of Fyodor Dostoevsky into a number of other Russian writers and his perception in the worldwide context, general description of his creative work and stylistic features. Specific traits of Fyodor Dostoevsky’s image in the Russian lyrics include usage of the hodonym Nevsky and epithet резкий (sharp, strongly-worded) as rhymes to the writer’s surname. It is also noteworthy that Fyodor Dostoevsky’s surname is used as a qualitative adjective in some contexts and describes properties of other images.
4
Zagumennov, Alexander V. "Fedor Ivanov as the author of the treatise “On the Knowledge of Antichrist’s Prelest”: pro et contra." Sibirskiy filologicheskiy zhurnal, no. 1 (2023): 73–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.17223/18137083/82/5.
Full textAbstract:
This study analyzes the work “On the Knowledge of Antichrist Prelest (Delusion)” that has been attributed to Fedor Ivanov so far. Fedor Ivanov was the ideologist of the Old Believers, condemned at the Moscow Cathedral in the 1666–1667 years and executed in Pustozersk in 1682 together with Archpriest Avvakum, priest Lazar, and monk Epiphanius. A twofold argument is offered that the text in question does not correspond either to Fyodor Ivanov’s manner of constructing the statement or to his understanding of the theological topics. The approach applied is based on phenomenological philosophy and philological hermeneutics. The main linguistic methods are description, comparison and contrast, and contextual analysis. First, a text fragment with an internal rhyme was selected and compared with other documents of Fedor Ivanov in terms of internal rhyme. The arithmetic mean of the number of components “from comma to comma” in the text analyzed has been revealed not to be characteristic of the writing style of the Old Believers’ ideologue. Second, the interpretation of the Antichrist in the text concerned was compared with that in the “Epistle to All Orthodox about Antichrist.” A discrepancy was revealed that cannot result from the author’s changing the target setting. Finally, a conclusion is made that the essay “On the Knowledge of Antichrist Prelest” was not created by Fedor Ivanov.
5
Koptelova, Natalya G. "INTERPRETATION OF THE IMAGE OF GARDEN IN THE COLLECTION OF POEMS “EMBARCATION FOR CYTHERA” BY GEORGY IVANOV (1911)." Vestnik of Kostroma State University 29, no. 1 (2023): 73–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.34216/1998-0817-2023-29-1-73-80.
Full textAbstract:
The article describes the interpretation of the image of garden, presented in the first collection of poems “Embarcation for
 Cythera” by Georgy Ivanov. It is proved that in the context of this artistic unity, the garden archetype is a cross-cutting symbol
 and acts as one of its axiological dominants. It is shown that the semantics and poetics of Georgy Ivanov’s image of a garden
 is very multifaceted and is motivated by the author’s dialogue with the literary and mythological ancient tradition, refracted
 through the influence on the poet of the works by Antoine Watteau, Konstantin Somov, Alexandre Benoîs, Paul-Marie
 Verlaine, Innokenty Annensky, Mikhail Kuzmin, Igor Severyanin, Fyodor Sologub. The article notes that the structure of
 the image of the garden, created in the debut collection of Georgy Ivanov, includes both the archetype of the Water, inherited
 from East Slavic mythology, and the apocalyptic symbol of the “bloody moon”. For the semantic filling of the image of
 garden the motif of languor (tenderness), often found in the lyrics of poets of the turn of the century (I.Annensky, F.Sologub,
 M.Kuzmin, Nikolai Gumilyov), is of great importance. The semantic evolution of the garden archetype represents the idea
 of the path, which is significant for the examined poet, which is key for the artistic consciousness of not only the authors of
 the Fin de Siècle, but also for Russian literature as a whole. Getting used to the time and space of different and at the same
 time somewhat similar “gardens”, Georgy Ivanov outlines the vector of his own creative development, predicts the movement
 towards the collection “Gardens”. He outlines the concept of “wanderings” through different mythologies and cultures, which
 is relevant both for the aesthetics of Russian symbolists and acmeists.
6
ОЛЕНА, ІЛЬЧЕНКО. "ІННОВАЦІЙНИЙ ДОСВІД ВИХОВАННЯ БЕЗПРИТУЛЬНИХ ДІТЕЙ НА ПОЛТАВЩИНІ У ДОРОБКУ ФЕДОРА ІВАНОВА(20-30-і рр. ХХ ст.)". Педагогічні науки, № 69 (31 травня 2018): 141–46. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1256691.
Full textAbstract:
The problem of homeless children in Ukraine of the 21th century has been updated. The best practices of one of the first managers in the Poltava region, who initiated the re-education of young people on the principles of teamwork and cohesiveness of pupils around joint productive work, were analyzed by Fedor Danilovich Ivanov, the head of the children's agricultural colony named after V.G. Korolenko. The main achievements of the colony were identified: the creation of a system of children's self-governance, the structure that included general meetings, the organizational committee, the system of detachments, commissions (economic, sanitary, linen, club board, library, editorial); availability of Pioneer and Komsomol organization; clear organization of the labor process of the colonists; organization and provision of educational work for pupils; organization of cultural and educational life and improvement of children. The author notes that the organization of work’s level has ensured its high effectiveness: the upbringing and returning to the full life of hundreds of pupils (together with the labor colony of A. S. Makarenko, about 2 thousand pupils were rescued by children's institutions, the cases of relapse were not recorded among them); the recognition of the colony of the People's Commissariat of Ukraine as a research and development institution, 1925; the abandonment of the posts of educators and the transition to self-governing colonial administration, from 1928 (colony named after M. Gorky, since 1930); the popularization of the experience of educational work in pedagogical journals, journals, methodical collections. There was concluded that the efficiency and high results in education had become possible due to the innovative, non-standard approach to work created by the personal convictions and views, efforts and desires of Theodore Danilovich Ivanov, his dedication and love for children. The specifics of work with children of preschool and junior school age have helped the children's institution become an innovative center for the development and validation of democratic, humane views on the education of young people. The author expresses the hope that the innovative experience of upbringing street children of Fyodor Ivanov will not only be a historical value, but will also be a real example for the formation of Ukrainian citizens and their return to full-fledged life.
7
Titova, Lubov V. "On the Little-Known Work of Deacon Fyodor Ivanov “On the Questioning of the Wicked Authorities” and Its Sources." Historical Courier, no. 2 (April 28, 2024): 269–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.31518/2618-9100-2024-2-19.
Full text
8
Mel'nikova, Yu. "Global Conflict and the Countours of a New World Order." World Economy and International Relations 66, no. 11 (2022): 134–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-11-134-138.
Full textAbstract:
Editorial office publishes the summary of a joint seminar, held by the Russian International Affairs Council (RIAC), the Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO RAS) and the World Economy and International Relations journal and dedicated to the impact of the Ukrainian crisis on the international relations. The event hosted such prominent experts as Igor Ivanov, RIAC President, Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (1998–2004) and RAS Correspondent Member; Fyodor Voitolovsky, IMEMO RAS Director, RAS Correspondent Member; Andrey Kortunov, RIAC Director General; Vladimir Baranovsky, Scientific Director of the Center of Situational Analysis, IMEMO RAS, RAS Academician; Alexey Gromyko, Director of the RAS Institute of Europe, RAS Correspondent Member; Oxana Gaman-Golutvina, President of the Russian Political Science Association, RAS Correspondent Member; Victor Kuvaldin, Head of the Department of Social and Human Arts, Lomonosov State University; Alexey Bogaturov, Distinguished Scholar; and Igor Istomin, Senior Research Fellow of the Center for Perspective American Studies, MGIMO University. Vladimir Baranovsky presented his new monograph at the seminar.
9
ILCHENKO, O. "V.G. KOROLENKO AGRICULTURAL YOUNG OFFENDERS INSTITUTION : EXPERIENCE OF SAFETY CHILDREN'S EDUCATION IN POLTAVA REGION." ТHE SOURCES OF PEDAGOGICAL SKILLS, no. 21 (March 9, 2018): 80–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.33989/2075-146x.2018.21.206053.
Full textAbstract:
The problem of homeless children in Ukraine of the 21th century has been updated. The best practices of one of the first managers in the Poltava region, who initiated the re-education of young people on the principles of teamwork and cohesiveness of pupils around joint productive work, were analyzed by Fedor Danilovich Ivanov, the head of the children's agricultural colony named after V.G. Korolenko.The main achievements of the colony were identified: the creation of a system of children's self-governance, the structure that included general meetings, the organizational committee, the system of detachments, commissions (economic, sanitary, linen, club board, library, editorial); availability of Pioneer and Komsomol organization; clear organization of the labor process of the colonists; organization and provision of educational work for pupils; organization of cultural and educational life and improvement of children.The author notes that the organization of work’s level has ensured its high effectiveness: the upbringing and returning to the full life of hundreds of pupils (together with the labor colony of A. S. Makarenko, about 2 thousand pupils were rescued by children's institutions, the cases of relapse were not recorded among them); the recognition of the colony of the People's Commissariat of Ukraine as a research and development institution, 1925; the abandonment of the posts of educators and the transition to self-governing colonial administration, from 1928 (colony named after M. Gorky, since 1930); the popularization of the experience of educational work in pedagogical journals, journals, methodical collections. There was concluded that the efficiency and high results in education had become possible due to the innovative, non- standard approach to work created by the personal convictions and views, efforts and desires of Theodore Danilovich Ivanov, his dedication and love for children. The specifics of work with children of preschool and junior school age have helped the children's institution become an innovative center for the development and validation of democratic, humane views on the education of young people.The author expresses the hope that the innovative experience of upbringing street children of Fyodor Ivanov will not only be a historical value, but will also be a real example for the formation of Ukrainian citizens and their return to full- fledged life.
10
Abramova, Veronika Igorevna, та Yulia Vladimirovna Arkhangelskaya. "“The Star of Venusˮ in Russian poetry of the 20th century: mythopoetic symbolism". Vestnik of Kostroma State University 27, № 3 (2021): 128–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.34216/1998-0817-2021-27-3-128-134.
Full textAbstract:
Being a part of the astronomical, temporal, anthropomorphic linguocultural codes, Venus as a celestial body has a significant place in the Russian verbal culture. This statement can be proved not only when analysing linguistic units, but also when referring to literary works, in particular to Russian lyric poetry. Twenty four poetic contexts, which include the image of Venus, have been analysed in the article (the works by Alexander Pushkin, Georgy Adamovich, Pavel Antokolsky, Leonid Martynov, Mikhail Zenkevich, Alexander Blok, Vyacheslav Ivanov, Nikolay Gumilyov, Marina Tsvetaeva, Fyodor Sologub, Mikhail Kuzmin, Georgy Shengeli, Ilya Selvinsky, Konstantin Simonov, Anatoliy Demyanov). The authors focus on the Russian 20th century lyric poetry because it is there that Venus appears as a star rather than a planet, and this corresponds to the archaic notions of this celestial body. Mercury and Mars are also called 'stars' in the 20th century poetry, but in a much smaller number of contexts than Venus. The authors come to the conclusion that Venus in Russian poets’ works can symbolise the onset of morning / evening, love, paradise, loneliness, fate, youth, old age, life journey. Moreover, Venus is included into poetic conceptions (it corresponds to the image of the Beautiful Lady in Alexander Blok’s poetry). The set of the above-mentioned symbolic meanings correlates with the archaic notions of Venus, widens them and makes the image of this celestial body mythopoetic.
11
Levandovskii, Andrei Nikitich. ""Crime and punishment": Sakhalin penal servitude in the perception of criminal offenders (mid-XIX–early XX Century)". Исторический журнал: научные исследования, № 1 (січень 2022): 57–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.7256/2454-0609.2022.1.37535.
Full textAbstract:
The subject of this article is the life of criminal criminals in the Sakhalin penal servitude and their view of the island's penitentiary system. This issue is very important, as it will allow us to take a fresh look at the dispute about the expediency of developing Sakhalin by exiled convicts. Special attention will be paid to the desire of criminal criminals to change their lives by means of labor in a new place, which is what government officials expected from them when planning the Sakhalin colonization project. As a source base, we will use a variety of interviews with prisoners, as well as the memories of the recidivist criminal Fyodor Shirokolobov, who tells, among other things, about his life on the island. In the historiography devoted to the Sakhalin penal servitude, works considering the views of a particular social group on the local penitentiary system are increasingly published. Writers, travelers, officials and even political criminals have already become the subject of various articles and monographs, which cannot be said about criminals. The novelty of our work will consist precisely in showing the attitude of the prisoners to the Sakhalin penal servitude. In the course of the study, we will come to the conclusion that in many respects it was formed under the influence of "Ivanov" - local authorities who were alien to physical work and honest work. This, in turn, became one of the reasons for the failure of the colonization of the island, since without the interest of the bulk of the population in the results of their work, there was nothing to dream of turning the "cursed island" into the "pearl of the Far East".
12
В.В., ПЕТРОВ. "КОНЦЕПЦИЯ ТРЕХ РЕВОЛЮЦИЙ В РАБОТАХ Д.С. МЕРЕЖКОВСКОГО". Цивилизация и варварство, № 13(3133) (27 жовтня 2024): 190–210. http://dx.doi.org/10.21267/aquilo.2024.3133.13.008.
Full textAbstract:
В исследовании анализируются литературно-философские работы Д.С. Мережковского, в которых революционные события 1905 и 1917 гг. рассматриваются в контексте концепции трех последовательных революций — политической, социальной и духовной (религиозной, нравственной). В числе источников, повлиявших на идеи Мережковского, указываются воззрения А.И. Герцена и Ф.М. Достоевского. Также отмечено определяющее влияние Э. Ренана, который интерпретировал проповедь исторического Иисуса и процесс возникновения христианства как всемирную революцию и космический переворот. В этой связи рассматриваются особенности рецепции «Жизни Иисуса» Ренана в России, включая критику его модернизирующего подхода у М.Д. Муретова. Прослеживается эволюция отношения Мережковского к трактовкам христианства у Ренана. Обсуждается концепция трех стадий революции — политической, социальной и духовно-религиозной, о которой Мережковский не уставал говорить, начиная с 1902 г. Апокалиптическое изображение событий 1917–1918 гг. иллюстрируется фрагментами из публикаций Р.В. Иванова-Разумника, футуристов и Андрея Белого, которые обратились к концепции трех этапов революции, введённой Мережковским. The study analyzes the literary and philosophical works of Dmitry Merezhkovsky, in which the revolutionary events of 1905 and 1917 are treated within the concept of the three successive revolutions — political, social and spiritual (religious, moral). Among the sources that influenced Merezhkovsky’s ideas are the views of Alexander Herzen and Fyodor Dostoevsky. The decisive influence of Ernest Renan is also noted. Renan interpreted the preaching of the historical Jesus and the process of the emergence of Christianity as a universal revolution and a cosmic upheaval, is also analyzed. In this connection, the peculiarities of the reception of Renan’s “Life of Jesus” in Russia, including Mitrophan Dmitrievich Muretov’s criticism of Renan’s modernizing approach, are examined. The evolution of Merezhkovsky’s attitude to Renan’s interpretation of Christianity is traced. The concept of three stages of the revolution — political, social, and spiritual-religious — which Merezhkovsky has repeatedly discussed since 1902, is under consideration. The apocalyptic depiction of the events of 1917–1918 is illustrated with citations from the works of Ivanov-Razumnik, the Futurists, and Andrei Bely, who appealed to the concept of three stages of revolution introduced by Merezhkovsky.
13
Medovarov, M. V. "Vladimir Karpets: the Formation of a Russian Thinker and Writer." Orthodoxia, no. 1 (December 3, 2023): 102–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.53822/2712-9276-2023-1-102-131.
Full textAbstract:
The article highlights the stages in the evolution of Vladimir Karpets' socio-political views. It also reveals the conditions of the formation of Vladimir Karpets as a thinker, basically at the early stage of his creative work from 1975 to 1995. Poems, historical and literary essays, publishing projects, and a dissertation by Vladimir Karpets are used as sources here. The ways in which the thinker promoted Orthodox and monarchical views against the background of the Soviet censorship are also shown. The article mentions the classics and contemporaries who influenced the formation of Vladimir Karpets' identity: his father Igor Karpets, Pyotr Palamarchuk, Tatyana Glushkova, Anatoly Ivanov, monarchists of the Perestroika era, Grigory Kremnev, Vladimir Mikushevich, Oleg Fomin, Alexander Dugin. All the poetry collections by Vladimir Karpets and the themes of his poems are considered. Attention is paid to his activity as a researcher and lecturer in law, his historical and legal studies of Russia and Spain. The article considers in detail the study by Vladimir Karpets of life and work of Admiral Alexander Shishkov and poet Fyodor Glinka, and traces the influence of their literary and religious views on the formation of Vladimir Karpets as a poet and thinker. The article states the features of monarchism according to Vladimir Karpets, his emphasis on the royal family natural succession, his interpretation of the Soviet period of history as a secret continuation of Russia's mission as Katechon Withholding. In this context, the published films and unpublished scripts by Vladimir Karpets for 1989–1992 are considered: “For Your Friends”, “The Third Rome”, “Name”, “Angel of Harvest”, “Khovanshchina”, “Morok” (“The Story of the Story”). The evolution of the thinker's views in the 1990s is discussed, including his reassessment of the Russian Church schism (dissent) in the 17th century. The article also tells about the translation activity of Vladimir Karpets, and represents a brief description of the subsequent evolution of Vladimir Karpets' thought during 1995–2016.
14
Андреева, Е. В. "Крымская тема в русской пейзажной живописи: этапы и особенности творческого освоения (конец XVIII – начало XX веков)". Nasledie Vekov, № 1(37) (31 березня 2024): 29–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.36343/sb.2024.37.1.002.
Full textAbstract:
Цель исследования состоит в выявлении особенностей развития российской пейзажной живописи, тематически связанной с Крымом и рассматриваемой как неотъемлемая часть национального культурного наследия. В качестве материалов использованы искусствоведческие исследования и репродукции живописных произведений. Исследованы складывавшиеся на протяжении всего XVIII в. важнейшие факторы, определившие развитие российской пейзажной живописи. Определено, что в русском изобразительном искусстве крымские сюжеты появляются после вхождения полуострова в состав Российской империи. Выявлены и последовательно проанализированы три этапа формирования образа Крыма в русской живописной традиции. Обоснована преемственность в развитии связанной с Крымом пейзажной живописи, состоящая в передаче знаний и навыков от художников-«первопроходцев» к ученикам. Установлены особенности, определяющие специфику крымской пейзажистики в рассматриваемый период. The aim of the study is to identify the features of the development of Russian landscape painting, thematically related to Crimea as an integral part of the cultural heritage of Russia. The complex of materials used included works of art history and collections of reproductions of paintings. The methodological tools involve a combination of systemic, historical-genetic and comparative-historical approaches, with the modern idea of cultural heritage, which represents an unconditional value for any people that must be preserved and passed on from generation to generation, being at the forefront. The most important factors that determined the development of Russian landscape painting and took shape throughout the 18th century have been identified (reforms of Peter the Great accompanied with the secularization of art, the establishment of the Academy of Arts and the presence in Russia of professional visual artists). It has been determined that Crimean subjects appear in Russian fine art after the peninsula became part of the Russian Empire. Three stages in the formation of the image of Crimea in the Russian pictorial tradition have been identified and analyzed: (1) the activities of landscape painters who depicted Crimean landscapes at the end of the 18th century (Mikhail Ivanov and Fyodor Alekseev), (2) the works of Ivan Aivazovsky, and (3) the legacy of representatives of the Cimmerian school of painting (Konstantin Bogaevsky, Maximilian Voloshin, and others). The continuity in the development of landscape painting associated with Crimea is substantiated, which consists in the transfer of knowledge and skills from “pioneer” artists to their students. It has been established that, at the first stage of its evolution, the art of landscape associated with Crimean subjects developed thanks to the desire of artists to demonstrate their own individuality, their skills in working in the natural landscape, a sense of civic responsibility, and the unique features characteristic of the Crimean nature. The features that define the specifics of Russian landscape painting thematically related to Crimea have been identified: (1) Crimean landscape painting was formed as a result of the activities of artists-“video-painters”, carried out on the initiative of the state; (2) the special place of the Crimean landscape in Russian fine art is due to the uniqueness of the landscapes and subjects depicted; (3) the evolution of landscape painting based on Crimean subjects, thanks to the practice of student succession, influenced the development of the entire national painting tradition.
15
Nikiforov, Yury S. "“POLITICALLY MATURE AND EXPERIENCED ONE...”: SOME MODELS OF ROTATION OF THE FIRST SECRETARIES OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY REGIONAL COMMITTEE IN THE 2ND HALF OF THE 1940S TO THE 50S (based on the materials of the Upper Volga regions)." Vestnik of Kostroma State University 30, no. 3 (2024): 214–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.34216/1998-0817-2024-30-3-214-222.
Full textAbstract:
The article analyses the models of rotation of regional leadership in the Upper Volga regions at the end of Stalin’s period and in the beginning of Khrushchev’s one. The focus is on the 3 first secretaries of the Communist Party regional committee in the 1940–50s - Pavel Alfyorov, Vladimir Luk’yanov, Fyodor Titov, who at different times were Party leaders of Vladimir, Ivanovo, and Yaroslavl regions. Attention is paid to quantitative and institutional characteristics associated with personnel rotations of late Stalinism and Khrushchev Thaw. The methodological basis of the study was the principles of historicism and systematicity, the prosopographic method, a combination of analysis of archival documents and sources of personal origin. The theoretical basis of the article is based on the ideas of Yelena Zubkova, Aleksandr Konovalov, Aleksey Fyodorov, Oleg Khlevniuk, Yoram Gorlizki. The source base is represented by documents from the Russian State Archive of Contemporary History, materials from documentary publications and reference publications, and personal sources (memoirs, interviews). The article concludes, that the biographies of the first secretaries of the regional committees of the Upper Volga regions (Pavel Alfyorov, Vladimir Luk’yanov, Fyodor Titov) demonstrate 3 different models of rotation of regional leadership personnel of Stalin and Khrushchev periods, but do not exhaust the diversity of personnel movements in the post-war USSR. It is noted that the first rotation model “From region to region”, inherent in Vladimir Luk’yanov, can be considered typical of the group of successful Stalinist promoters of the late 1930s. It is emphasised that the second model “Region-centre-region”, inherent in Pavel Alfyorov, reflects a move across the regions with a short-term return to the central apparatus of an experienced but not quite successful Party functionary. It is stated that the third model “Second-First-Second”, inherent in Fyodor Titov, was more rare, characterised by alternating the position of first secretary of the regional committee in the regions of the Russian Soviet Republic and second secretary in the republican communist parties of the USSR. The significance for career growth in the 1940-50s is noted considering the positions of second secretary of the regional committee, chairman of the regional executive committee, inspector of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks, structures of the central apparatus. As the finishing point in the nomenclature career of Party functionaries of the 1950–60s, the Party Control Committee is indicated. The publication is an invitation to discussion for representatives of the scientific community regarding the typification and classification of regional Party leaders of the Soviet era.
16
Titarenko, E. M. "Russian painting of the 19th century in the context of the projective aesthetics of N.F. Fyodorov." Solov’evskie issledovaniya, no. 4 (December 15, 2019): 114–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.17588/2076-9210.2019.4.114-127.
Full textAbstract:
The article is dedicated to the insufficiently studied problem of N.F. Fyodorov’s projective aesthetics research connected to his interpretation of Russian painting of the 19th century. The objects of the analysis are such works of the philosopher as “The Question of Restoration of Kinship among Mankind. The Means for the Restoration of Kinship (Sobor)” (1880s), “About the Kremlin Walls Paintings” (1893), “Kremlin Walls” (1893), “The brilliant robber. (About Ge’s Painting “The Crucifixion”)” (1894), “Moscow Rumyantsev’s Museum by the Kremlin and the Monument to the Founder of this Museum in the Kremlin” (1898) and other works. The article considers N.F. Fyodorov’s analysis of paintings by A.A. Ivanov, N.N. Ge, V.V. Vereschagin, and I.E. Repin. The comparative investigation of the aesthetic program and artistic ideas of Ivanov and Fyodorov is based on the analysis of the painting “The Apparition of Christ before the People” (1858). The article traces the influence of the artist’s works on the conceptual and compositional creation of the “pictorial demonstration” of Fyodorov’s aesthetic supramoralism. It uncovers the specificity of the philosopher’s religious-philosophical discourse, defined by the iconographic traditions and imaginary system of Christian art. The analysis of Fyodorov’s texts dedicated to the paintings by Ge and Repin, reveals that he does not accept the aesthetic program of realism. The article defines the meaning of projective ecphrasis in Fyodorov’s critical account of Ge’s “Biblical cycle” as a theurgical project. The reception of Vereschagin’s painting is considered in the context of the historiosophical ideas of Fyodorov, based on the principles of Christian eschatology.
17
Kazhiyakbarova, Aigerim, Gulshat Shaikamal, Natalya Papusha, and Indira Aitzhanova. "LINEAR EVALUATION OF THE EXTERIOR OF FIRST-CALF HEIFERSOF DIFFERENT LINEAGE UNDER CONDITIONS OF BEK+ LLP." 3i intellect idea innovation - интеллект идея инновация 1 (2024): 51–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.52269/22266070_2024_1_51.
Full textAbstract:
The article presents the characteristics of linear evaluation of exterior of the first calving heifers of different lineage in the conditions of dairy complex of Beck+ LLP located in the Fyodorov district of the Kostanay region. Three experimental groups of cows were formed based on the different lineage of their first calving: Vis Back Ideal, Reflection Sovereign, and Osborndale Ivanhoe. The assessment of first-calving cows' exterior traits was conducted using 24 indicators and 9-point scale from day 30 to day 150 of lactation. Throughout the study, cows from the Vis Back Ideal and Reflection Sovereign lines demonstrated their superiority in overall body conformation, dairy type, and limb structure compared to their herd mates from the Osborndale Ivanhoe line. Across most of the evaluated traits such as hip height, rear width, udder depth, udder attachment, and hind leg posture, first-calving cows from the Vis Back Ideal line exhibited an advantage over those from the Reflection Sovereign and Osborndale Ivanhoe lines. A comprehensive evaluation of exterior traits was conducted, revealing that first-calving cows from the Vis Back Ideal and Reflection Sovereign lines are classified as "good," while their herd mates from the Osborndale Ivanhoe line are classified as "satisfactory." These finding confirm that servicing bulls significantly influence the expression of linear exterior traits in offspring.
18
Dementyeva, Tatyana, and Lyubov Voronkina. "Darovoe Estate and Its Owner (According to New Archival Documents)." Неизвестный Достоевский 7, no. 4 (2020): 106–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.15393/j10.art.2020.5121.
Full textAbstract:
The Dostoevsky family acquired the Darovoe estate in the Kashirsky uyezd of the Tula province on August 7, 1831. Here the future writer and his brothers and sisters spent the happy summer months in 1832–1836. The estate included the manor house (“seltso”) of Darovoye, the village of Darovaya, and land in the Nechaeva, Tripolye, Harina, Shelepova, and Chertkova wastelands. From the late 18th century to 1829, the listed territories belonged to the Kashirsky uezd landowner Vasily Khotyaintsev, then to his sons Peter, Nikolai and Vasily, and subsequently to their grandsons Pavel and Ivan Khotyaintsev. The latter owner sold the estate to O. A. Glagolevskaya in 1829, and she, in turn, sold it to the mother of the writer F. M. Dostoevsky. In February 1833, her husband, M. A. Dostoevsky, expanded the estate by purchasing the neighboring village of Cheremoshnya with the namesake wastelands. In 1840, after the death of their parents, the Dostoevsky brothers and sisters: Mikhail, Fyodor, Varvara, Andrey, Vera, Nikolai and Alexandra became the owners of the Darovoe estate. In 1852, the estate was bought from them by the writer’s younger sister, Vera Mikhailovna Ivanova (nee Dostoevskaya). After her, Darovoe and Cheremoshnya were owned by her children. The authors analyzed the documents from the Russian State Archive of Ancient Acts, The State Archive of the Tula region, The Central State Archive of the City of Moscow, and the Department of Manuscripts of the Russian State Library. The archival materials revealed the circumstances of the change of ownership of the hamlet and the village of Darovoe and the incident changes from the late 18th century to 1852. It also revealed the details of the purchase of the village of Darovoe by M. F. Dostoevskaya and the exact date of acquisition of the village of Cheremoshnya by M. A. Dostoevsky (February 16, 1833). The study revealed the circumstances of the transfer of the estate to V. M. Ivanova and date of transaction (October 20, 1852), and named the participants of the division. F. M. Dostoevsky, who previously refused his share of the inheritance, did not participate in it. This article is the first to publish the mortgages on Darovoe and Cheremoshnya in 1833, the plan of the hamlet of Darovoe with the manor house dated 1847 (the closest in time to the memorial period), as well as the 1852 act of division, which specifies the conditions for the acquisition by V. M. Ivanova of the parental estate, its size and composition.
19
Ya., G. Solodkin. "Последнее крымское нашествие на Москву в изображении русских публицистов конца XVI — первой трети XVII веков / The last Crimean invasion of Moscow in the works by Russian essayists of the late XVI — first third of the XVII centuries". Materialy po Arheologii i Istorii Antičnogo i Srednevekovogo Kryma (Materials in Archaeology and History of Ancient and Medieval Crimea) 8 (31 грудня 2016): 475–84. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.556178.
Full textAbstract:
Крымское нашествие на Москву летом 1591 г., оказавшееся последним в длительной истории двусторонних отношений, получило отражение наряду с летописными сочинениями в русской публицистике кануна Смутного времени и 1620-х гг. Упоминание (не отличающееся точностью) о неудачной попытке Гази-Гирея II овладеть российской столицей, восходящее к какому-то краткому летописцу, имеется в Хронографе второй редакции. В Повести о царе Федоре Ивановиче, написанной патриархом Иовом, и Временнике дьяка Ивана Тимофеева мы встречаем пространные рассказы, посвященные боям под Москвой между татарами и войском, фактическим главнокомандующим которого являлся Борис Годунов. Используя летописный источник (видимо, тот, который В. Н. Татищев назвал «Историей о разорении русском»), Иов тенденциозно изобразил правителя Бориса выдающимся полководцем и подчеркнул значение молитв о заступничестве, обращенных к Богу и Богородице «освятованным» царем Федором. Между прочим, победа, одержанная над крымцами у стен Москвы, под пером «смиренного» патриарха делала шурина бездетного государя его достойным наследником. Иван Тимофеев же, писавший по собственным воспоминаниям спустя два десятилетия, если не позднее, о быстром бегстве татар из окрестностей «царствующего града», представил Годунова (в том числе под впечатлением Серпуховского похода 1598 г.) «лжехрабрым» военачальником, а главную роль в разгроме хана отвел мольбам подобного святым самодержца, в конце жизни которого с Крымом установились мирные отношения. / The Crimean Tatar invasion of Moscow in the summer of 1591 was the last in the long history of bilateral relations, and it is reflected along with chronicle writings in the Russian journalism on the eve of the Time of Troubles and the 1620s. Mention (not very accurate) about the failed attempt by Gazi Giray II to master the Russian capital, rising to some brief chronicler, available in the second edition of the Chronograph. The Tale of Tsar Fyodor Ivanovich, written by the patriarch Iov, and Annals clerk Ivan Timofeev we encounter lengthy stories devoted to battles near Moscow, between the Tatars and the army, which was the de facto commander of Boris Godunov. Using chronicle source (probably the one that V. N. Tatischev called “History of the Destruction of Russia”), Iov tendentiously portrayed ruler Boris as an outstanding military leader and stressed the importance of prayers for the intercession addressed to God and the Virgin Mary by “saint” Tsar Fedor. By the way, the victory won over the Crimeans at the walls of Moscow, under the pen of “humility” of the patriarch did childless brother in law of the sovereign of his worthy successor. Ivan Timofeev also, writing on his own memoirs after two decades, if not later, the rapid flight of the Tatars from the vicinity of “imperial city”, presented Godunov (including under the influence of Serpukhov march 1598) as a “false courage” commander, and a leading role in the Khan defeat of this holy prayers autocrat, at the end of life is the Crimea have established peaceful relations.
20
Lechowska, Marta. "Антропология маскарада в концепции Федора Степуна". Philosophical polylogue, № 2 (2021). http://dx.doi.org/10.31119/phlog.2021.2.143.
Full textAbstract:
The article takes up the issue of the masquerade in an anthropological perspective. On the basis of F. Stepun’s letter to his wife (included in his work From the Letters of an Ensign Artilleryman, 1916), in which the philosopher gives a characterization of the New Year as a holiday which inseparable attribute is the mask and masquerade (as a form of transgressing the individual self in the sphere of a culture), the author distinguishes the two types of this phenomenon – pure entertainment and philosophical or transcendental masquerade (these are Stepun’s terms). The paper explains what these terms mean in relation to the theatrical phenomenon and also draws a distinction between the mentioned secular holiday and religious holidays, for example Christmas Day and Feast of Holy Trinity. Then, in the light of the text The Main Problems of the Theater (1923), the question about the conditions of the possibility of a philosophical masquerade is posed. Stepun, introducing the concepts of "unanimity" and "multanimity", distinguishes three anthropological types – the city dweller, the mystic, and the artist; only one of them meets the conditions of philosophical masquerade. Thanks to the juxtaposition of these two mentioned above texts, the anthropological basis of the theatrical phenomena, including the masquerade, emerges. The article also raises the question of the tragic principle in the context of anthropology as well as culture. The similarity of the concepts of tragedy introduced by Fyodor Stepun and Vyacheslav Ivanov is shown. The final point of the considerations is the statement that refers the notion of theatricality first and foremost to an anthropological category, and only secondarily to cultural phenomena. The paper shows the necessary anthropological background for the phenomenon of masquerade