To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Gaslighting.
Journal articles on the topic 'Gaslighting'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Gaslighting.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
McGill, Emily. "Am I Gaslighting Myself?" Southwest Philosophy Review 40, no. 1 (2024): 35–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/swphilreview20244016.
Full textAbstract:
The concept of self-gaslighting has recently become prevalent in popular discourse but has yet to be subjected to detailed philosophical analysis. In this paper, I examine one context in which self-gaslighting is often discussed: situations in which someone has experienced trauma. I argue that the phenomenon currently described as self-gaslighting fails to display core features of manipulative gaslighting and that therefore we should seek other conceptual resources for understanding such cases. I suggest that self-gaslighting, at least in some paradigmatic cases, amounts to either extremely successful interpersonal gaslighting or to internalized oppression. Utilizing these concepts instead of self-gaslighting avoids conceptual difficulties and also has a significant practical payoff. By moving away from the language of self-gaslighting we can move away from feelings of self-blame that so often accompany trauma.
2
Kurniawan, Licia. "Unwritten Scars: Gaslighting in Relationships." K@ta Kita 9, no. 2 (October 23, 2021): 253–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.9744/katakita.9.2.253-258.
Full textAbstract:
Gaslighting is a modern term that describes a type of toxic relationship that psychologically abuses the victim. Gaslighting is understood as manipulating the victim into questioning his sanity and the gaslighter has a goal to create a ‘surreal’ environment that will cause the victim to feel like he is in the wrong and is crazy. Since gaslighting is all about manipulation, it can cause mental disorders. In the theoretical framework, we will apply the concept of gaslighting and self-actualization to show the effects of gaslighting and the ways to cope with it. In this work, we explore how gaslighting can cause anxiety, depression and low self-esteem in the victims. We show that the victims of gaslighting can deal with it by fulfilling physiological needs and building herself up again by the help of friends and families.Keywords: gaslighting, toxic relationship, poetry, lyrical poem
3
Adkins, Karen C. "Gaslighting by Crowd." Social Philosophy Today 35 (2019): 75–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/socphiltoday201971660.
Full textAbstract:
Most psychological literature on gaslighting focuses on it as a dyadic phenomenon occurring primarily in marriage and family relationships. In my analysis, I will extend recent fruitful philosophical engagement with gaslighting (Abramson, “Turning up the Lights on Gaslighting” [2014]; McKinnon, “Allies Behaving Badly: Gaslighting as Epistemic Injustice” [2017]; Ruiz, “Spectral Phenomenologies” [2014]) by arguing that gaslighting, particularly gaslighting that occurs in more public spaces like the workplace, relies upon external reinforcement for its success. I will ground this study in an analysis of the film Gaslight, for which the phenomenon is named, and in the course of the analysis will focus on a paradox of this kind of gaslighting: it wreaks significant epistemic and moral damages largely through small, often invisible actions that have power through their accumulation and reinforcement.
4
Cheung, Alvin YH. "Legal gaslighting." University of Toronto Law Journal 72, no. 1 (December 1, 2021): 50–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/utlj-2020-0125.
Full textAbstract:
Suppose that an authoritarian regime wants to make changes to legal norms or institutions to consolidate its hold on political power. Suppose further that the regime in question cannot simply ignore the domestic or international costs of doing so, and that it has an interest in responding to critiques of these changes based on liberal democratic norms and the rule of law. How can it do so? One possible approach is to sow confusion and undermine the normative standards themselves – in effect, to ‘gaslight’ the domestic or international audience (or both). To that end, a regime might assert that the change it proposes resembles a ‘best practice’ from one or more other jurisdictions. Such emulation need not be thorough, or even sincere; it may suffice simply to assert that a proposed change resembles that in a jurisdiction with ironclad rule-of-law credentials. The changes being adopted may bear no real resemblance to the ‘comparators’ on closer examination. Alternatively, the measures being adopted may be similar on their face, but operate in such a different context that they end up serving a very different function to the function they perform in the comparator jurisdiction. Such gaslighting need not succeed in deceiving outsiders or subjects; undermining the standards by which legal reforms are measured, sowing confusion, or providing a superficial pretext for inaction may be sufficient.
5
Davis, Angelique M., and Rose Ernst. "Racial gaslighting." Politics, Groups, and Identities 7, no. 4 (November 23, 2017): 761–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2017.1403934.
Full text
6
Ruíz, Elena. "Cultural Gaslighting." Hypatia 35, no. 4 (2020): 687–713. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/hyp.2020.33.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractThis essay frames systemic patterns of mental abuse against women of color and Indigenous women on Turtle Island (North America) in terms of larger design-of-distribution strategies in settler colonial societies, as these societies use various forms of social power to distribute, reproduce, and automate social inequalities (including public health precarities and mortality disadvantages) that skew socioeconomic gain continuously toward white settler populations and their descendants. It departs from traditional studies in gender-based violence research that frame mental abuses such as gaslighting—commonly understood as mental manipulation through lying or deceit—stochastically, as chance-driven, interpersonal phenomena. Building on structural analyses of knowledge in political epistemology (Dotson 2012a; Berenstain 2016), political theory (Davis and Ernst 2017), and Indigenous social theory (Tuck and Yang 2012), I develop the notion of cultural gaslighting to refer to the social and historical infrastructural support mechanisms that disproportionately produce abusive mental ambients in settler colonial cultures in order to further the ends of cultural genocide and dispossession. I conclude by proposing a social epidemiological account of gaslighting that a) highlights the public health harms of abusive ambients for minority populations, b) illuminates the hidden rules of social structure in settler colonial societies, and c) amplifies the corresponding need for structural reparations.
7
Manne, Kate. "Moral Gaslighting." Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 97, no. 1 (June 1, 2023): 122–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arisup/akad006.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract Philosophers have turned their attention to gaslighting only recently, and have made considerable progress in analysing its characteristic aims and harms. I am less convinced, however, that we have fully understood its nature. I will argue in this paper that philosophers and others interested in the phenomenon have largely overlooked a phenomenon I call moral gaslighting, in which someone is made to feel morally defective—for example, cruelly unforgiving or overly suspicious—for harbouring some mental state to which she is entitled. If I am right about this possibility, and that it deserves to be called gaslighting, then gaslighting is a far more prevalent and everyday phenomenon than has previously been credited. And it can also be a purely structural phenomenon, as well as an interpersonal one, which remains a controversial possibility in the current literature.
8
Crease, Robert P. "Scientific gaslighting." Physics World 36, no. 1 (January 1, 2023): 18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/2058-7058/36/01/22.
Full text
9
L, Paige. "Understanding Gaslighting." Scientific American 31, no. 6s (December 2022): 56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1022-56.
Full text
10
AKDENİZ, Büşra, and Hüdayar CIHAN. "Gaslighting ve Kişilerarası İlişkiler: Sistematik Derleme Çalışması." Psikiyatride Guncel Yaklasimlar - Current Approaches in Psychiatry 16, no. 1 (November 6, 2023): 146–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.18863/pgy.1281632.
Full textAbstract:
Gaslighting is a manipulation technique that makes the perpetrator doubt the mind of the victim, questions the perception of reality, and makes the person think that they are crazy. Although gaslighting is thought to be a marriage syndrome, gaslighting can occur not only in marriages but also in all relationships. The purpose of this review study is to systematically compile the studies on gaslighting and relationships, to reveal what kind of relationships gaslighting is seen and what its outputs are. Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane Library, TRDizin, and Web of Science databases were used in the research. The systematic review was carried out according to the PRISMA criteria. The terms "gaslighting", "gaslight" and "relationship" were used as keywords in Turkish and English to be scanned in databases. 97 studies were accessed from the databases, 31 studies were viewed and 17 of them were included in the study. Most of the studies were conducted in the USA. The study findings showed that gaslighting can occur in many different areas such as health, politics, and romantic and social relationships. It has been seen that the personality of the victim and the perpetrator, partner addiction, and the balance of power in the relationship are the factors that affect gaslighting. In addition, it has been found in the literature that there are a very limited number of studies on gaslighting. Especially in Turkish literature, quantitative or qualitative study findings directly addressing people who have been exposed to gaslighting have not been found. The reason for this was thought to be related to the fact that a scale study on gaslighting has not yet been carried out in Turkiye.
11
Hussain, Syeda Tahira. "Challenging Gaslighting of Women in Academia: A Call for Gender Equality and Inclusive Environment." International Journal of Innovation in Teaching and Learning (IJITL) 10, no. 1 (June 28, 2024): 40–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.35993/ijitl.v10i1.3146.
Full textAbstract:
Gaslighting is a pervasive form of manipulation that psychologically dents its victims. In the context of academia, women frequently face gaslighting. Unfortunately, only a few women are cognizant of this psychological abuse. This research explored the concept of gaslighting, its manifestations in academic settings, and its detrimental impact on women's experiences along with the possible solutions. Therefore, this research emphasizes the importance of challenging gaslighting behaviors, fostering gender equality, and creating inclusive environments that empower women in academia. During the research mostly primary data along with secondary data were used, because the actual victims can more effectively describe the issues. Therefore, it includes interviews with working women in academia from sampled institutions. Findings showed that, 33% of participants reported direct experiences or witnessing instances of gaslighting in the academic workplace, with an additional 21% admitting to experiencing gaslighting to varying degrees, while a notable proportion of participants (32%) reported challenges in accessing equitable resources, opportunities, or support compared to male colleagues, highlighting systemic gender disparities in academia. This research has recommended that the vicious circle of gaslighting can be controlled if academic institutions prioritize the creation of supportive and empowering spaces that value and amplify women's contributions. Keywords: Gaslighting, Women’s Empowerment, Women’s Rights, Psychology, Gender inequality
12
Sweet, Paige L. "The Sociology of Gaslighting." American Sociological Review 84, no. 5 (September 20, 2019): 851–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0003122419874843.
Full textAbstract:
Gaslighting—a type of psychological abuse aimed at making victims seem or feel “crazy,” creating a “surreal” interpersonal environment—has captured public attention. Despite the popularity of the term, sociologists have ignored gaslighting, leaving it to be theorized by psychologists. However, this article argues that gaslighting is primarily a sociological rather than a psychological phenomenon. Gaslighting should be understood as rooted in social inequalities, including gender, and executed in power-laden intimate relationships. The theory developed here argues that gaslighting is consequential when perpetrators mobilize gender-based stereotypes and structural and institutional inequalities against victims to manipulate their realities. Using domestic violence as a strategic case study to identify the mechanisms via which gaslighting operates, I reveal how abusers mobilize gendered stereotypes; structural vulnerabilities related to race, nationality, and sexuality; and institutional inequalities against victims to erode their realities. These tactics are gendered in that they rely on the association of femininity with irrationality. Gaslighting offers an opportunity for sociologists to theorize under-recognized, gendered forms of power and their mobilization in interpersonal relationships.
13
Litvintsev, Denis B., and Galina P. Litvintseva. "Institutional Gaslighting: How Institutions Distort our Reality." Journal of Institutional Studies 16, no. 1 (March 25, 2024): 074–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2024.16.1.074-084.
Full textAbstract:
Prince Charles' allegations of institutional gaslighting against Buckingham Palace in 2022 sparked an extensive discussion around a phenomenon that, until this event, was considered predominantly psychological in academia. The authors of this article, relying mostly on socio-cultural and institutional approaches, also abandon the strictly psychological interpretation of gaslighting as a form of violence in favor of an interdisciplinary approach. This made it possible to identify the foundations and features of institutional gaslighting, studied by scientists in economics and management, healthcare, science and education, politics, etc. The article also reveals the tools for implementing institutional gaslighting in various spheres of social life. As a result, the authors conclude that the key feature of institutional gaslighting is the ability of the institutions themselves to change the mental environment and influence the perception of reality. This was actually ruled out, for example, by D. North, who denied institutions independent existence. In addition, the authors consider gaslighting not just as an institutional betrayal, but as a dysfunction of any institution, one of the most important functions of which is to limit and control violence in society.
14
Kosak, Mirian Maria, Deivdy Borges Pereira, and Adriele Andreia Inácio. "Gaslighting e mansplaining." Simpósio Gênero e Políticas Públicas 5, no. 1 (January 18, 2021): 251–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/sgpp.2018v5.p251.
Full textAbstract:
A violência contra mulher em nossa sociedade ocorre de diversas maneiras, destacase a violência doméstica por gerar o maio número de vítimas. A violência doméstica é aquela que acontece dentro do âmbito da família, entre quaisquer membros, sendo possíveis agressores os maridos, companheiros, namorados, ou pessoas com as quais a mulher teve alguma relação afetiva íntima como ex-maridos e ex-namorados. Os tipos de violência que podem acontecer nesse âmbito são as violências físicas, psicológicas, patrimoniais, sexuais e morais. A violência psicológica consiste em um tipo de violência silencioso e de difícil detecção, pois suas marcas não são aparentes. Dentre as formas de violência psicológica estão o gaslighting e mansplaining, pouco discutidos, porém bastante comuns nas relações afetivas. Desta forma, o presente artigo busca explanar e discutir o gaslighting e o mansplaining, ressaltando a prejudicialidade destas práticas contra as mulheres. Consiste em uma pesquisa bibliográfica empreendida nas bases de dados online SciELO, PePSIC, Lilacs, Teses USP e Google Acadêmico. Os resultados apontaram que o gaslighting consiste em uma forma de violência na qual o agressor tenta fazer, através da distorção de fatos e omissão de situações, com que a vítima duvide de sua memória e sanidade, passando a duvidar de seu senso de realidade e percepções. O mansplaining refere-se a uma fala didática direcionada à mulher, como se ela não tivesse a capacidade de compreender ou executar determinada tarefa, justamente pelo fato de ser mulher. As duas formas de violência, assim como todo tipo de violência psicológica diminuem a autoestima da mulher, fazem com que ela perca a confiança em si mesma, trazem grandes prejuízos à saúde mental das mesmas bem como prejudicam sua vida social e laboral. Foi constato também que existe pouca produção científica sobre o tema.
15
Thomas, Laura. "Gaslight and gaslighting." Lancet Psychiatry 5, no. 2 (February 2018): 117–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(18)30024-5.
Full text
16
Berenstain, Nora. "White Feminist Gaslighting." Hypatia 35, no. 4 (2020): 733–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/hyp.2020.31.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractStructural gaslighting arises when conceptual work functions to obscure the nonaccidental connections between structures of oppression and the patterns of harm they produce and license. This article examines the role that structural gaslighting plays in white feminist methodology and epistemology using Miranda Fricker's discussion of hermeneutical injustice as an illustration (Fricker 2007). Fricker's work produces structural gaslighting through several methods: i) the outright denial of the role that structural oppression plays in producing interpretive harm, ii) the use of single-axis conceptual resources to understand intersectional oppression, and iii) the failure to recognize the legacy of women of color's epistemic resistance work surrounding the issue of sexual harassment in the workplace. I argue that Fricker's whitewashed discussion of epistemic resistance to sexual harassment in the United States is a form of structural gaslighting that fails to treat women of color as knowers and exemplifies the strategic forgetting that is a central methodological tactic of white feminism.
17
G, Andrea. "21st-Century Gaslighting." Scientific American 29, no. 4s (October 2020): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/scientificamericantruth0920-1.
Full text
18
Catapang Podosky, Paul-Mikhail. "Manne, Moral Gaslighting, and the Politics of Methodology." Logos & Episteme 15, no. 1 (2024): 89–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/logos-episteme20241517.
Full textAbstract:
Kate Manne claims that her account of gaslighting rectifies regrettable deficiencies in existing theories. However, Manne hasn’t done enough to demonstrate the novelty of her view given that she fails to seriously engage with a significant portion of the gaslighting literature. This is an issue in the politics of methodology. Many theorists working on gaslighting exist within the margins, attempting to centre their perspectives over dominant points of view. We must listen to marginalised folk when aiming to understand a phenomenon that disproportionately affects them. If Manne had listened, she would have come to see difficulties with some of her suggestions, such as the possibility of unintentional gaslighting.
19
Rani, A., and Dr T. S. Ramesh. "Socially Gaslighted Women in Bama’s Sangati." Think India 22, no. 3 (September 12, 2019): 749–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.26643/think-india.v22i3.8394.
Full textAbstract:
Gaslighting is a systematic psychological manipulation of behavior. Manipulative influence is exerted on a targeted individual or group to have desired behavior. This research paper applies the term gaslighting in the social context. The marginalized, especially women are socially gaslighted by the power structured social system. This paper studies Bama’s Sangatiwhich deals with many gaslighted women by narrating interconnected anecdotes. The conceptualized feminine ideology becomes a weapon for the degradation and elimination of women from the center. The impact of gaslighting on the older generation is so powerful that one cannot trace any sign of shattering it. The younger generation, in spite of the awareness of their abuses andpsychological and social influences, cannot overcome gaslighting as they are oppressed by many tactics like placing them in a shameful situation, depriving their rights, denying them their respect. They cannot escape from being victims of gaslighting as they are tied up by family responsibility and their innate tendency for motherhood.
20
Ghaltakhchyan, Siranoush. "LINGUISTIC PORTRAYAL OF GASLIGHTING IN INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS." Armenian Folia Anglistika 20, no. 1 (29) (May 15, 2024): 61–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.46991/afa/2024.20.1.61.
Full textAbstract:
The paper explores the intricate interplay between language and manipulation, focusing on the linguistic and extralinguistic manifestations of gaslighting in interpersonal communication. Gaslighting is viewed as a form of manipulative communication that involves deliberate denial or distortion of reality, making the victims doubt their own actions, perception, memory and sanity. The victim’s ongoing confusion leads to a sense of powerlessness and a diminished self-esteem. Using a qualitative-quantitative linguistic method, the paper dissects the portrayal of gaslighting dynamics in the short psychological film Your Reality, which is based on real-life experiences. Through comprehensive psycholinguistic analysis, an attempt is made to illustrate how specific manipulative tactics are intentionally employed to achieve gaslighter’s abusive objectives. Examining the subtle, yet powerful verbal and non-verbal manipulative tactics employed in the film, the research aims to elucidate gaslighting dynamics in interpersonal communication and empower readers with valuable insights into recognizing and addressing early signs of such deceitful behavior in real-life situation. Thus, this knowledge is crucial for fostering awareness, establishing boundaries to prevent gaslighting attempts and promoting healthy communication.
21
Sengkey, Marssel Michael, and Shaima Banu Illahibaccus-Sona. "Psychological and behavioral impacts of early adult women victims of gaslighting behavior in romantic relationships." INSPIRA: Indonesian Journal of Psychological Research 5, no. 1 (June 30, 2024): 38–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.32505/inspira.v5i1.7277.
Full textAbstract:
This study aims to identify and analyze the psychological and behavioral impact of early adult women who are victims of gaslighting in romantic relationships. Gaslighting is a behavior carried out by a gaslighter by intimidating, lying, dominating and manipulating victims where the goal is for the victims to doubt themselves, their memories, their own thoughts, and their own sanity. This study uses a qualitative research method with a case study approach. Subjects amounted to early adult woman who was a victim of gaslighting behavior in North Sulawesi, Indonesia. The data collection method used was observation and semi-structured interviews and then the data were analyzed using the data reduction process analysis method. The results showed that the psychological impacts experienced by victims of gaslighting behavior were confusion, frustration, anxiety, stress and low self-esteem. Meanwhile, the behavioral impact experienced by victims of gaslighting behavior is the emergence of argumentative behavior, desperate to convince the gaslighter, starting to doubt their own views, having difficulty making decisions, giving in and being silent to avoid conflict, and depending on the gaslighter.
22
Budiyanti, Rani Tiyas, and Penggalih Mahardika Herlambang. "Analisis Bibliometrik Medical Gaslighting dalam Layanan Kesehatan." Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan Bhakti Husada: Health Sciences Journal 15, no. 01 (June 7, 2024): 135–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.34305/jikbh.v15i01.1045.
Full textAbstract:
Latar Belakang: Dalam pelayanan kesehatan, kepercayaan, empati dan komunikasi yang baik diperlukan untuk meningkatkan kualitas pelayanan kesehatan dan mengurangi konflik. Meski demikian, terdapat salah satu tantangan dalam penerapannya yaitu munculnya medical gaslighting yang merupakan ketidakpercayaan tenaga kesehatan terhadap pasien sehingga meragukan pengalaman maupun kondisi yang dirasakan pasien. Hal ini dapat menyebabkan berbagai dampak seperti keterlambatan penanganan, trauma, dan sebagainya yang juga berpengaruh kepada kepuasan pasien. Meski demikian, belum banyak penelitian yang membahas mengenai hal tersebut. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memetakan lebih lanjut mengenai penelitian terkait medical gaslighting. Metode: Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif kuantitatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan analisis bibliometrik. Data yang diperoleh berasal dari database Scopus yang terbit pada tahun 2013-2023. Data dianalisis dari menu analisis Scopus dan software VOS viewer. Hasil: Berdasarkan analisis, terdapat 13 publikasi terkait medical gaslighting yang terindeks Scopus pada tahun 2013-2023, dimana artikel mengenai hal tersebut baru dipublish di tahun 2021. Terdapat 22 penulis yang membahas mengenai topik tersebut dan publikasi terbanyak didapatkan pada tahun 2023 dengan kontributor penulis terbanyak berasal dari Amerika Serikat. Kolaborasi atau kerjasama penulisan terkait medical gaslighting masih sangat minim antar beberapa negara. Simpulan: Perkembangan penelitian mengenai medical gaslighting mengalami pertumbuhan yang positif dari tahun ke tahun. Meski demikian belum ada penelitian mengenai hal tersebut di Indonesia. Hal ini menjadi peluang dalam mengembangkan riset dan kolaborasi terkait medical gaslighting.
23
Bellomare, Martina, Vincenzo Giuseppe Genova, and Paola Miano. "Gaslighting Exposure During Emerging Adulthood: Personality Traits and Vulnerability Paths." International Journal of Psychological Research 17, no. 1 (May 8, 2024): 29–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.21500/20112084.6306.
Full textAbstract:
Among the many forms of psychological violence, gaslighting is a particularly insidious manipulative behaviour that includes acts aimed at controlling and altering one’s own partner’s sensations, thoughts, actions, affective state, self-perception, and reality-testing. Thepurpose of this study was to evaluate the association between the experience of gaslighting and dysfunctional aspects of the partner’s personality. Gaslighter personality facets were assessed using the Personality Inventory for DSM-5–Informant Form–Adult (PID-5-IRF), while gaslighting behaviours were assessed using a 25-item questionnaire, based on the three categories of glamour, good-guy, and intimidator (Stern, 2007). The sample was made up of a group of 177 Italian emerging adults aged between 19 and 26 (49.2% male, 50.8% female; M = 21.88, SD = 1.75), enrolled at University, who participated voluntarilyin the research. In fact, none of them received any form of direct or indirect incentive.In our study, we applied a beta regression model mapping the Likert scale into the open interval (0,1). The main results show (a) good-guy gaslighting is positively associated with manipulativeness and negatively associated with deceitfulness; (b) glamour gaslighting has a negative association with separation insecurity and manipulativeness, but it is positively associated with irresponsibility; (c) intimidator gaslighting has a positive association with separation insecurity and distractibility and a negative association with eccentricity and perceptual dysregulation; (d) all three gaslighting categories are negatively associated with anhedonia and impulsivity. Based on what emerged from the data, aspects such as separation insecurity, irresponsibility, and distractibility can be seen as serious risk factors for gaslighting.For this reason, with regard to clinical implications, an early recognition of dysfunctional traits in potential abusers should be fostered in order to protect both potential abusers and their partner from aggressive conduct within an intimate relationship.
24
Sarkar, Dr Queen. "From Tolerance to Transformation: Unraveling the Impact of Organizational Culture and Policies on Addressing Gaslighting in Academia." International Journal of Innovation in Teaching and Learning (IJITL) 10, no. 1 (June 28, 2024): 22–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.35993/ijitl.v10i1.3041.
Full textAbstract:
This paper explored gaslighting in academia, focusing on its impact on women's career development and leadership experiences. Using feminist and critical race theories, the study examined how organizational culture, mentorship, networks, and policies supported or hindered women's academic careers. An inter-sectional perspective revealed how race, ethnicity, and disability intersected with gender to shape women's experiences in academic leadership. The paper analyzed how gaslighting operated in academia and the various forms it took. It also examined strategies for institutions and individuals to challenge gaslighting and promote a culture of equity and respect. Drawing inspiration from Kate Elizabeth Russell's My Dark Vanessa and Zoë Heller's Notes on a Scandal, the research offered insights into psychological manipulation, gender dynamics, and power relations within the academic sphere. Keywords: Gaslighting, Organizational Culture, Academia, Women, Leadership, Psychological Manipulation, Feminist theory, Critical Race Theory
25
Khan, Kianaat, Noor ul Saba Tariq, and Saima Majeed. "Psychological Impact of Medical Gaslighting on Women: A Systematic Review." Journal of Professional & Applied Psychology 5, no. 1 (March 21, 2024): 110–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.52053/jpap.v5i1.249.
Full textAbstract:
This systematic review aimed to evaluate the experiences of medical gaslighting in women. Medical gaslighting is used to describe the dismissive, invalidating, and biased experiences of people with the healthcare system that result in frustration, doubt, and feelings of isolation. Women have significantly negative experiences with healthcare providers when seeking diagnosis and/or treatment, which defines how they signify their experiences as medical gaslighting. To conduct the review, Google Scholar, JSTOR, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Semantic Scholar, Psychology of Health, Jacobs Health Institute of Women, and Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis were explored with the keywords of medical gaslighting, women's health, and healthcare experiences of women. 10 articles were selected for the systematic review after data extraction based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Seven themes emerged from the selected articles: 1) denial and dismissal of symptoms 2) delayed diagnosis 3) negative experiences with healthcare professionals 4) gender bias in healthcare 5) the need for self-advocacy 6) stigmatization of mental health by healthcare professionals 7) anxiety and trauma. The experiences of women with the healthcare system are overwhelmingly negative and encompassed in medical gaslighting, leading to the worsening of health conditions. The healthcare system requires many reforms, starting with decreasing gender biases in hospitals, healthcare providers and research.
26
Ahern, Kathy. "Institutional Betrayal and Gaslighting." Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing 32, no. 1 (2018): 59–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/jpn.0000000000000306.
Full text
27
Gass, Gertrude Zemon, and William C. Nichols. "Gaslighting: A marital syndrome." Contemporary Family Therapy 10, no. 1 (1988): 3–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00922429.
Full text
28
Jun, Myung-Hee, Jung A. Park, and Judae Lee. "Analysis of Crime Articles Related Gaslighting: Focusing on Text Mining and Content Analysis." Korean Academy Welfare Counseling 13, no. 1 (April 30, 2024): 217–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.20497/jwce.2024.13.1.217.
Full textAbstract:
This study aims to analyze the main keywords and themes of criminal cases related to gaslighting through text mining techniques, and to reveal the characteristics of articles containing the concept of gaslighting through content analysis of individual case articles on gaslighting. To this end, 710 criminal case articles searched for 'gaslighting' as a topic in 11 major daily newspapers in Korea from 2019 to 2023 were analyzed using text mining techniques such as word clouding and topic modeling, and the contents of the cases were presented through content analysis. As a result of topic modeling these incidents, they were organized into four topics: 'Valley murders', 'Minor abuse and sexual crimes', 'Sexual assault by authority', and 'Sports and celebrity-related incidents', which were reported the most. By analyzing the content of articles centered around the same incidents, a total of 118 criminal cases were extracted. The main types of crimes were sexual crimes, accounting for 60%, followed by murder, assault, fraud, and others. Further, when categorizing the relationship between perpetrators and victims, it was found that crimes occurred mainly in workplace relationships, romantic relationships, family relationships (parents-children, spouses, siblings), and priestly relationships. This reaffirmed that such crimes utilizing psychological manipulation and domination occur in existing intimate relationships. Based on the analysis results, directions, and implications for future research on domestic gaslighting crimes were suggested.
29
Whitney, Shiloh. "Anger Gaslighting and Affective Injustice." Philosophical Topics 51, no. 1 (2023): 27–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/philtopics20235113.
Full textAbstract:
Anger gaslighting is behavior that tends to make someone doubt herself about her anger. In this paper, I analyze the case of anger gaslighting, using it as a paradigm case to argue that gaslighting can be an affective injustice (not only an epistemic one). Drawing on Marilyn Frye, I introduce the concept of “uptake” as a tool for identifying anger gaslighting behavior (persistent, pervasive uptake refusal for apt anger). But I also demonstrate the larger significance of uptake in the study of affective injustice: just as the concept of credibility names the epistemic behavior whereby we take someone seriously as an epistemic being, the concept of uptake names the uniquely affective cooperative behavior whereby we take someone seriously as an affective being. I answer Miranda Fricker’s epistemic notion of a prejudicial credibility economy with the affective notion of prejudicial uptake economies: uptake, like credibility, can be produced in a deficit for one social group relative to a surplus for another. Deviating from the parallels with Fricker, for whom the injustice of epistemic injustice is due to prejudice in the motives or character of individuals, as well as from accounts that ground it in aptness or affective goods, I suggest that the injustice of anger gaslighting behavior can be located at the structural scale of power relationships between social groups, in the tradition of Iris Marion Young. Anger gaslighting behavior counts as unjust wherever it (re)produces prejudicial uptake economies. Adapting sociological concepts of feeling rules and the emotion work they demand, I introduce the concepts of “uptake rules” and “uptake work” to further enable analysis of uptake economies as affective social structures, and to suggest a site for resistant or reparative affective agency.
30
Rudenok, A. I., O. V. Petyak, and O. B. Igumnova. "Gender aspects of gaslighting as a form of psychological violence in the family." ScientifiScientific Herald of Sivershchyna. Series: Education. Social and Behavioural Sciences 2021, no. 2 (November 1, 2021): 137–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.32755/sjeducation.2021.02.137.
Full textAbstract:
The article reveals the problem of psychological violence in the family and considers the gender aspects of the manipulative phenomenon of gaslighting. Manipulations are aimed at forcing other people to perform exactly the actions that the manipulator needs. These actions lead to certain consequences that the manipulator wants to get in accordance with his motives. In a family relationship, the gaslight partner does not care what the victim partner wants and aspires to. It is important to him that others obey. Because the victim partner does not always agree to submit to this pressure, the gaslighter uses manipulation to indirectly influence the motivation, decisions and actions of the victim partner. Manipulative techniques are often veiled in such a way that the victim cannot understand the harmful effects that the partner has on him. The aim of the study was to study the concept of “gaslighting” in the environment of interpersonal relationships of marital partners; studies of gender features of gaslighting; identification of verbal and nonverbal means of manipulation characteristic of a gaslighter; development of practical recommendations on ways to counteract the gaslighter. The results of our study showed that destructive statements to victim partners characterize the specifics of gaslighting as a kind of psychological, emotional violence in family relationships. Women are more told about their mental illness, inferiority, humiliation, success. Men in their address more often hear from partners statements about the wrong perception of reality. The most common manifestations of gaslighting in the family relationships of respondents are: humiliation of the person by the partner, devaluation of feelings and the importance of important events, as well as the transfer of responsibility to the partner. Regarding the manipulative actions used by gaslight partners towards the respondents, we highlighted accusations from partners, ignoring feelings, verbal insults and rejection of the lifestyle of partner victims. The key strategies for resolving family conflicts that respondents use are rivalries and adaptations. In general, based on the results, we found that there is no gender variation in the use of gaslighting by marital partners in family relationships – since both women and men are equally faced with the manifestations of this phenomenon in the family Key words: gaslighting, manipulator, gaslighter partner, victim partner, psychological violence, family relations.
31
Burschel, Maria. "Geschlechtsspezifisches Gaslighting im Trennungsprozess von Eltern." Soziale Arbeit 72, no. 2 (2023): 58–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/0490-1606-2023-2-58.
Full textAbstract:
Anhand einer qualitativen Studie über Trennungsverläufe von Eltern in unterschiedlichen sozialen Milieus werden Risikofaktoren für geschlechtsspezifisches Gaslighting benannt. Es kann gezeigt werden, dass naturalistische Vorstellungen von Elternschaft, gewaltfreie Kommunikation, Spiritualität und Gefühlsarbeit geschlechtsspezifisches Gaslighting befördern können und eine Kultur der hegemonialen Männlichkeit in verdeckter Form perpetuieren. Daraus ergebenden sich Implikationen für die Soziale Arbeit.
32
Muflihah, Itsna, and Najlatun Naqiyah. "Identifikasi korban kekerasan gaslighting pada remaja putri." TERAPUTIK: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling 6, no. 2 (October 31, 2022): 238–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.26539/teraputik.621278.
Full textAbstract:
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pola perilaku awal dalam gaslighting dan dampak yang terjadi pada korban gaslighting pada individu dalam masa perkembangan mereka. Pedekatan penelitian ini menggunakan metode studi kasus. Pengumpulan data yang dilakukan adalah wawancara, observasi dan studi dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian ada 5 pola gaslighting yaitu a) pelaku memberi respon yang berlebihan dan berani memberikan pengorbanan kepada pasangannya diawal menjalin hubungan, b) pelaku sering memuji secara berlebihan dan berusaha menampakkan kesempurnaan di depan orang lain, c) sifat dominan, pelaku akan mendominasi dalam hubungan seperti mengoreksi penampilan pasangan, perkataan atau perilaku pasangan yang dirasa kurang cocok bagi dirinya d) apabila gaslightee melawan, gaslighter akan melakukan playing victim kepada gaslightee, e)besar kemungkinan berlanjut pada kekerasan lainnya seperti kekerasan fisik, kekerasan verbal, bahkan kekerasan seksual.
33
Petrov, Vladislav. "Multiparametric psychological diagnostics of propensity to gaslighting in interpersonal relationships." Applied psychology and pedagogy 8, no. 2 (April 13, 2023): 182–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/2500-0543-2023-8-2-182-193.
Full textAbstract:
The article focuses on the study of the main psychometric characteristics of the author's questionnaire for assessing the propensity to gaslighting in interpersonal relationships. A multiparametric approach to the psychodiagnostics of the phenomenology of gaslighting is defined as the subject of scientific research, the goals are to develop a diagnostically significant model for assessing the propensity to gaslighting in interpersonal relationships, implementing it in the questionnaire of the same name with its subsequent approbation. The research methodology was based on axiological, humanistic, activity and polysubject approaches in psychology, relationship theory and deviantology. Semantic content analysis, expert survey, psychological testing, self-assessment were used at different stages of scientific research. The total volume of the empirical sample was 165 people (including 17 experts and 148 subjects). Mathematical and statistical data processing involved the calculation of descriptive statistics and correlation analysis, which was implemented in MS Excel and IBM SPSS Statistics v 27 software products.
Based on the results of theoretical and analytical research, a six-parametric gaslighting model was developed, which was the basis for the corresponding questionnaire. The measuring framework of the methodology and the degree of severity of gaslighting is formed by six private scales: 1) «behavioral intolerance»; 2) «expressive dominance»; 3) «projection of personal problems»; 4) «intrigue» (manipulation); 5) «verbal-behavioral discongruence»; 6) «devaluation of the other», from which an integral indicator is formed. During the psychometric study of the questionnaire, its high criterion validity was confirmed – statistically significant correlations with self-assessments of the same name were established (Rs = 0.42-0.63 at p=0.01). It is assumed that the technique has a good diagnostic potential, and can be used to study the phenomenology of gaslighting. Innovative are: the stimulus material of the questionnaire, the description of diagnostic scales, psychometric parameters of the methodology. The material makes it possible to provide psychodiagnostics with innovative diagnostic tools that provide solutions to a wide range of tasks in the field of not only psychodiagnostics, but prevention, assistance and correction
34
Tobias, Heston, and Ameil Joseph. "Sustaining Systemic Racism Through Psychological Gaslighting: Denials of Racial Profiling and Justifications of Carding by Police Utilizing Local News Media." Race and Justice 10, no. 4 (March 4, 2018): 424–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2153368718760969.
Full textAbstract:
This article examines Police Services and local media discourses on street checks in Hamilton, Ontario, from June 2015 to April 2016 and their usage as a form of psychological abuse known as gaslighting. Despite the widespread coverage that the Hamilton Police Service received as a result of being linked to systemic racist practices, a year later, the Hamilton Police Service was able to avoid being implicated in deliberately conducting racial profiling through strategic tactics in the discourse they relied upon and presented in the media. Through an analysis of 27 local news media articles on the topic of street checks, it is argued that the Police Services and local media discourse enact gaslighting, a form of psychological abuse that is used to manipulate object(s) in order to deceive and undermine the credibility of the target. The psychological effects of gaslighting on people of color included a sense of alienation, disenfranchisement from the community, and distrust toward the police. Through a case study application, it is suggested that gaslighting is part of a systemic, historical process of racism that has been used by the police and government organizations to both illegally target people of color and deny complicity in racial profiling.
35
Aurangzeb, Wajeeha, Nabeela Shakur Abbasi, and Sehrish Kashan. "Unveiling the Impact of Gaslighting on Female Academic Leadership: A Qualitative Phenomenological Study." Contemporary Issues in Social Sciences and Management Practices 2, no. 3 (September 30, 2023): 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.61503/cissmp/02-03-2023-01.
Full textAbstract:
Gaslighting is a psychological manipulation phenomenon that makes people doubt their own perception and sanity. In light of the prevalence of women in academia, this may have profound effects on academic leadership. Gaslighting is a common problem for women in academic leadership that can be harmful to their mental well-being and ability to develop in their careers. This phenomenon may lead to physical health effects, psychological and emotional stress, work-life balance issues, professional setbacks, low self-esteem, loss of confidence, and low self-efficacy. This study adopted a qualitative phenomenological research design with purposive sampling. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews with 15 mid-career female academic leaders working in two public sector universities in Punjab. Research ethical guidelines were followed by obtaining the informed consent of the participants and keeping their identities confidential. Transcribed data was analyzed through thematic analysis while adopting the IPA (interpretative phenomenological analysis) model. The study provided insights into the causes of gaslighting at the individual and organizational levels. Furthermore, the psychological, emotional, and professional impacts of gaslighting were explored. Participants suggested remedial measures such as awareness, engagement, social networking, documenting and reporting incidents, professional counselling, and boundary-setting skills that may help female academic leaders face and handle this situation effectively.
36
Dr Wajeeha Aurangzeb, Ms. Nabeela Shakur Abbasi, and Dr Sehrish Kashan. "Unveiling the Impact of Gaslighting on Female Academic Leadership: A Qualitative Phenomenological Study." Contemporary Issues in Social Sciences and Management Practices 2, no. 3 (September 14, 2023): 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.61503/cissmp.v2i3.41.
Full textAbstract:
Gaslighting is a psychological manipulation phenomenon that makes people doubt their own perception and sanity. In light of the prevalence of women in academia, this may have profound effects on academic leadership. Gaslighting is a common problem for women in academic leadership that can be harmful to their mental well-being and ability to develop in their careers. This phenomenon may lead to physical health effects, psychological and emotional stress, work-life balance issues, professional setbacks, low self-esteem, loss of confidence, and low self-efficacy. This study adopted a qualitative phenomenological research design with purposive sampling. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews with 15 mid-career female academic leaders working in two public sector universities in Punjab. Research ethical guidelines were followed by obtaining the informed consent of the participants and keeping their identities confidential. Transcribed data was analyzed through thematic analysis while adopting the IPA (interpretative phenomenological analysis) model. The study provided insights into the causes of gaslighting at the individual and organisational levels. Furthermore, the psychological, emotional, and professional impacts of gaslighting were explored. Participants suggested remedial measures such as awareness, engagement, social networking, documenting and reporting incidents, professional counselling, and boundary-setting skills that may help female academic leaders face and handle this situation effectively.
37
Edwards, Judith. "Cancer Healing, Groups and Gaslighting." JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY 2, no. 2 (April 1, 2018): 25–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.29245/2578-2959/2018/2.1121.
Full text
38
Hartmann, Corinna. "Dans les griffes du « gaslighting »." Cerveau & Psycho N° 144, no. 6 (June 1, 2022): 82–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/cerpsy.144.0082.
Full text
39
Spear, Andrew D. "Gaslighting, Confabulation, and Epistemic Innocence." Topoi 39, no. 1 (November 8, 2018): 229–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11245-018-9611-z.
Full text
40
Stark, Cynthia A. "Gaslighting, Misogyny, and Psychological Oppression." Monist 102, no. 2 (March 9, 2019): 221–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/monist/onz007.
Full text
41
Yadava, Om Prakash. "‘Medical gaslighting’—an eye-opener." Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 39, no. 5 (August 17, 2023): 441–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12055-023-01588-3.
Full text
42
O, Naomi. "Gaslighting by the Gas Industry." Scientific American 331, no. 1 (July 2024): 96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican072024-4879oykznbesoi8gl6por6.
Full text
43
Il’chenko, Sergey N. "Gaslighting: Transformation of Manipulation from the Particular to the General in the Practice of Modern Media." Humanitarian Vector 18, no. 3 (October 2023): 153–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.21209/1996-7853-2023-18-3-153-163.
Full textAbstract:
The problem of manipulating the consciousness of the media audience today is a key one in analyzing the adequacy of the reflection of reality in media practice. Which determines the relevance of the theoretical understanding of the phenomenon of gaslighting. The article examines the practice of modern media as a sphere of introducing the gaslighting format as a multifunctional method of influencing the collective consciousness of the perceiving media audience. The author considers this phenomenon in the perspective of the history of its origin and the introduction of art into the field of practical psychology, interpreting everyday behavior in society exclusively of individuals. The author suggests interpreting this term not only as a way of influencing an individual but also as a concept that is an integral part of information warfare. The article also examines the evolution of such concepts as fake and post-truth, which together predetermined the reincarnation of gaslighting in the activities of individual media representatives and media structures as a whole. In addition, the article examines the ambivalence of this term, which defines the subjects of the gaslighting process as equal participants in manipulation. This creates double standards in the interpretation of information, especially in the context of psychological confrontation in the context of a bilateral conflict. The complexity of the study of the problems stated in the article lies in the original idea of analyzing the phenomenon of gaslighting as a phenomenon characteristic of mass consciousness, primarily taking into account such manipulation with the active participation of the media of all types and statuses. At the same time, theoretical developments concerning this problem are mainly related to personal psychology. However, the situation requires a more active study of the current media situation.
44
Ermolova, Т. V., A. V. Litvinov, E. A. Balygina, and O. E. Chernova. "New theoretical approaches to the study of the phenomenon of gaslighting." Современная зарубежная психология 13, no. 1 (April 27, 2024): 128–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2024130112.
Full textAbstract:
<p style="text-align: justify;">Gaslighting is typically viewed as a form of psychological manipulation that makes the victim doubt his or her sense of reality and leads to a loss of agency and mental stability. It was spotted over 60 years ago and has long been the subject of study by psychiatrists. Recently, interest in the phenomenon of gaslighting has grown significantly, becoming the subject of research by scientists of various scientific disciplines, which inevitably leads to the expansion of the meaning of this phenomenon and endowing it with additional properties. Psychology is thought to have contributed to this process through the study of symbolic interactionism, attachment theory, self-verification theory, and shared reality. This article presents the dynamics of the development of this term, defines the main features of this phenomenon, and analyzes the basis on which new approaches to the study of gaslighting in modern international psychology are built. The most common assumption in the latest studies is that gaslighting is possible when standard social-cognitive mechanisms are involved in atypical social situations. Relationships with significant others largely determine people's epistemic needs: close people shape and reflect an individual's self-image and perception of the surrounding reality. It is this special position of loved ones that gives gaslighters leverage over the victim.</p>
45
Henrique de Lucas, Carlos, Fabio De Sousa Fernandes, and Diana Yoshie Takemoto. "“A louca dos gatos” ou sobre como gaslaitear o feminino." Locus: Revista de História 26, no. 1 (April 17, 2020): 99–122. http://dx.doi.org/10.34019/2594-8296.2020.v26.29808.
Full textAbstract:
O artigo conceitua o gaslighting e suas formas de atuação por meio de fundamentação teórica e análise de produtos culturais e midiáticos, demonstrando-o como um fenômeno social originado no interior de sociedades historicamente patriarcais, mais especificamente as ocidentais, e, por conseguinte, dicotômicas – binomiais, que instituem papeis baseados no gênero para todas as pessoas. Ao não obedecer a essa imposição de papéis, ou normatividade, conforme se verá, a sujeita-alvo do gaslighting se torna um ser abjeto. Neste texto, o abjeto pode ser observado pela criação, via discurso, da personagem “Louca dos Gatos”. Concluímos, mesmo que provisoriamente, que o gaslighting e os estereótipos sobre o gênero distorcem as relações de modo intencional para assegurar, reforçar e naturalizar sistemas de poder como o machismo e a heteronormatividade, o que relega as mulheres (e por que não dizer as mais diversas formas de vivência do feminino) a constantes violências e a um eterno silêncio social.
46
Saskara, I. Putu Adi, Ulio, and I. Gusti Arya Anggriawan. "PERILAKU GASLIGHTING PARENTING TERHADAP PERKEMBANGAN PSIKOLOGI ANAK USIA DINI." Pratama Widya: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini 8, no. 1 (April 30, 2023): 15–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.25078/pw.v8i1.2415.
Full textAbstract:
Pada kasus gaslighting parenting ini dapat terjadi ketika orang tua melakukan gaslights pada anaknya. Alih-alih mendukung secara emosional, orang tua yang melakukan gaslighting dapat membuat anak mereka merasa lebih buruk tentang diri mereka sendiri, jika kesalahan telah dialihkan untuk menjadikan orang tua sebagai korban. Cara lain di mana orang tua dapat melakukan gaslights adalah jika mereka terlalu mengontrol anak mereka. Ini berarti mereka mungkin telah mengendalikan apa yang seharusnya disukai, tidak disukai, dihargai, dan diyakini oleh anak mereka.
Pada penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif deskriptif dan wawancara. Penelitian kualitatif jenis ini juga merupakan penelitian yang menghasilkan informasi atau pengetahuan yang dapat menggambarkan pengertian dan kejadian-kejadian yang berkaitan dalam kehidupan masyarakat. Peneliti dalam penelitian ini mengumpulkan data kualitatif dari informan dan data lapangan. Dari penelitian ini sebagai orang tua dan anak harus mampu saling terbuka dalam menghadapi masalah yang dihadapi. Perilaku gaslighting ini sendiri sebaiknya lebih di perhatikan oleh orang tua, baik itu di lakukan secara sadar maupun secara tidak sadar karena dapat memberikan pengaruh yang sangat signifikan pada anak.
47
J Davis, Shirley. "The enormous problem of medical gaslighting." MOJ Addiction Medicine & Therapy 7, no. 1 (October 7, 2022): 4–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.15406/mojamt.2022.07.00151.
Full text
48
Fordon, Kelly. "The Witness Plays Dodgeball, and: Gaslighting." WSQ: Women's Studies Quarterly 47, no. 3-4 (2019): 305–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/wsq.2019.0044.
Full text
49
NAZİR, Thseen, and Ayşe ÖZÇİÇEK. "Gaslighting: Confronting hypocritical kind of Emotional abuse." Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, July 27, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.34056/aujef.1015105.
Full textAbstract:
Psikolojik bir istismar biçimi olan Gaslighting, buna maruz kalan bireylerin kendi akıl sağlıklarından şüphe etmelerine ve kendilerine olan güvenlerini kaybetmelerine neden olur. Gaslighting’in her ne kadar henüz resmi bir teşhis kimliği olmasa da günlük hayatta sıklıkla karşılaşılan bir olgu olduğu araştırmacılar tarafından kabul ediliyor. Bilindiği üzere Gaslighting, göz ardı edilmesi halinde kurbanlar üzerinde ciddi mental ve psikolojik sorunlara sebebiyet verebiliyor. Bu makale, Gaslighting üzerine yapılan çalışmaları bir araya getirerek Gaslighting’i tanımlamayı, teşhis etmeyi ve ona karşı savaşmayı ele almayı, böylece bir farkındalık oluşturmayı amaçlamaktadır.
50
Moody, Karissa. "#Gaslighting." Counseling and Family Therapy Scholarship Review, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.53309/eibe3827.
Full textAbstract:
As the utilization of social media continues to integrate itself into domains of culture, livelihood, and worldviews, the following exposition aims to introduce how such integration may pose as a new realm of gaslighting that has yet to be discussed. The progressive conceptualization of gaslighting as a form of manipulation will aid in providing readers with an understanding of this idea through a systemic lens by first, explaining underlying reasons for manipulation as an all-inclusive concept. The value of explication will serve in identifying plausible reasons of manipulation which pertain to the concept of gaslighting within social media. Within this perspective, the features which define social media as a virtual form of connection are presented to exhibit how different elements of online communication support the multifaceted presence of gaslighting seen within social media. Such information allows for deeper exploration in demonstrating how the impacts of social media, which perpetuate gaslighting, propose relational implications for aspects of perception, connection, and validation. By developing this contemporary perspective on gaslighting, there is hope to inspire further consciousness, awareness, and recognition associated with the perceptions of self, others, and relationships with others that are influenced by aspects of social media and permit for the manipulation of reality. In doing so, the chance to enlighten others may provide new opportunities in contemplation when deliberating the inherent nature of face-to-face connections which excel in authenticity, validation, and appreciation, to the inner world of social media which warrants for gaslighting.