Books on the topic 'Genetic engineering Public opinionAustralia'

Weatherall, D. J. Public lecture. Singapore: University Liaison Office, National University of Singapore, 1991.

Lemkow, Louis. Public attitudes to genetic engineering: Some European perspectives. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1993.

European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions., ed. Public attitudes to genetic engineering: Some European perspectives. Shankill, Co. Dublin, Ireland: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, 1993.

Wexler, Barbara. Genetics and genetic engineering. 2nd ed. Detroit, MI: Thomson/Gale Group, 2006.

1916-, Davis Bernard D., and American Academy of Arts and Sciences., eds. The Genetic revolution: Scientific prospects and public perceptions. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991.

Haas, Volker. Gentechnik-Kritik am Scheideweg: Ist eine Teilakzeptanz der Gentechnik für Forschung, Medizin und Enzymproduktion notwendig? München: Regenbogen, 1997.

Renn, Ortwin, and Jürgen Hampel. Gentechnik in der Öffentlichkeit: Wahrnehmung und Bewertung einer umstrittenen Technologie. Frankfurt: Campus, 1999.

Crossing over: Genomics in the public arena. Calgary, Alberta, Canada: University of Calgary Press, 2005.

Geoffrey, Lawrence, and Hyndmarsh Richard, eds. Recoding nature: Critical perspectives on genetic engineering. Sydney: UNSW Press, 2004.

Australia. Parliament. House of Representatives. Standing Committee on Industry, Science, and Technology. Genetic manipulation: The threat or the glory? : report. Canberra: Australian Govt. Pub. Service, 1992.

Ressler, Oliver. GeGen-Welten: Widerstände gegen Gentechnologien : ein Projekt. Wien, Austria: Edition Selene, 1998.

Regional Public Hearing Workshop on GMO (2006 Dhaka, Bangladesh). Report from Regional Public Hearing Workshop on GMO: Dhaka, Bangladesh, 12 February, 2006. Dhaka: Royal Danish Embassy, 2006.

Hauskeller, Michael. Biotechnology and the integrity of life: Taking public fears seriously. Aldershot, Hants, England: Ashgate, 2007.

Dieter, Urban. Technikfurcht und Technikhoffnung: Die Struktur und Dynamik von Einstellungen zur Gentechnik : Ergebnisse einer Längsschnitt-Studie. Stuttgart: Verlag Grauer, 1999.

Frank, Hartmann. Pflanzengentechnik in Deutschland: Akzeptiert und nachgefragt? Berlin: Verlag News & Media, 2005.

Seifert, Franz. Gentechnik, Öffentlichkeit, Demokratie: Der österreichische Gentechnik-Konflikt im internationalen Kontext. München: Profil Verlag, 2002.

Slaby, Martin. Subjektive Technikbewertung: Was leisten kognitive Einstellungsmodelle zur Analyse von Technikbewertungen : dargestellt an Beispielen aus der Gentechnik. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius, 2002.

R, Chapman Audrey, and Frankel Mark S, eds. Designing our descendants: The promises and perils of genetic modifications. Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003.

Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons. Agriculture Committee. The segregation of genetically modified fFoods. London: Stationery Office, 2000.

Wartburg, Walter P. von. Gene technology and social acceptance. Lanham, Md: University Press of America, 1999.

Bakshi, Ann-Sofie. Tilltro och misstanke: Genteknik och fosterdiagnostik i det offentliga samtalet. Linköping: Tema Kommunikation, Linköpings universitet, 2000.

Christophe, Noisette, and Brac de la Perrière, Robert Ali, eds. OGM: La bataille de l'information : des veilles citoyennes pour des choix technologiques éclairés. Paris: C. L. Mayer, 2010.

Something to chew on: Challenging controversies in food and health. Dublin, Ireland: University College Dublin Press, 2012.

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Subcommittee on Toxic Substances and Environmental Oversight. Releasing genetically engineered organisms into the environment: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Toxic Substances and Environmental Oversight of the Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States Senate, Ninety-ninth Congress, second session, May 16, 1986. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1986.

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Subcommittee on Toxic Substances and Environmental Oversight. Releasing genetically engineered organisms into the environment: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Toxic Substances and Environmental Oversight of the Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States Senate, Ninety-ninth Congress, second session, May 16, 1986. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1986.

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Subcommittee on Toxic Substances and Environmental Oversight. Releasing genetically engineered organisms into the environment: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Toxic Substances and Environmental Oversight of the Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States Senate, Ninety-ninth Congress, second session, May 16, 1986. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1986.

Committee, New York (State) Legislature Senate Higher Education. In the matter of a public hearing on genetically modified crops in New York State: Before the New York State Senate Standing Committee on Higher Education and Standing Committee on Consumer Protection. [Clifton Park, N.Y.]: Candyco Transcription Service, 2000.

J, Khoury Muin, Burke Wylie, and Thomson Elizabeth J. 1950-, eds. Genetics and public health in the 21st century: Using genetic information to improve health and prevent disease. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

Gottweis, Herbert. Governing molecules: The discursive politics of genetic engineering in Europe and the United States. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1998.

The social costs of genetic welfare. New Brunswick, N.J: Rutgers University Press, 1991.

name, No. Engineering trouble: Biotechnology and its discontents. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2003.

New York (State). Legislature. Assembly. Standing Committee on Agriculture. Joint public hearing, should New York State regulate genetically-modified organisms (GMOs) and foods produced from these GMOs. Mineola, NY: En-De Reporting Services, 2000.

Public Research and the Regulatory Review of Small-Market (Specialty) Biotechnology-Derived Crops Workshop (2004 Riverdale, Prince George's County, Md.). Public Research and the Regulatory Review of Small-Market (Specialty) Biotechnology-Derived Crops Workshop: Proceedings : November 8-9, 2004, USDA, APHIS (Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service), Riverdale, Maryland. Edited by Goldner William R, Thro Ann Marie, Radin John William 1944-, United States. Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service, and United States. Agricultural Research Service. Washington, D.C.?]: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service, 2005.

Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons. Agriculture Committee. Eighth Report: Genetically modified organisms and seed segregation : Report, together with the Proceedings of the Committee, Minutes of Evidence and Appendices. London: Stationery Office, 2000.

Atienza, Julián. La imagen social de las nuevas tecnologías biológicas en España: Informe (resultados del estudio 2213). Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 1997.

California. Legislature. Senate. Committee on Natural Resources and Wildlife. Joint hearing, impacts of genetic engineering on California's environment: Examining the role of research at public universities (Novartis/UC Berkeley agreement). Sacramento, CA: Senate Publications, 2000.

Wildlife, California Legislature Senate Committee on Natural Resources and. Joint hearing--impacts of genetic engineering on California's environment: Examining the role of research at public universities (Novartis/UC Berkeley agreement). Sacramento, CA (1020 N. Street, Sacramento): Additional copies, Senate Publications, 2000.

The ideal of nature: Debates about biotechnology and the environment. Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2011.

European Foundation for the Improvement of Living & Working Conditions. Public Attitudes to Genetic Engineering. European Communities / Union (EUR-OP/OOPEC/OPOCE), 1993.

Lemkow, Louis. Public Attitudes to Genetic Engineering: Some European Perspectives. Diane Pub Co, 1993.

New York (State). Legislature. Assembly. Standing Committee on Agriculture., ed. Public hearing on genetically modified organisms. [Albany, N.Y.?]: Associated Reporters Int'l., 2000.

Gehring, Verna V. Genetic Prospects: Essays on Biotechnology, Ethics, and Public Policy. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Incorporated, 2003.

V, Gehring Verna, ed. Genetic prospects: Essays on biotechnology, ethics, and public policy. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2003.

Committee on Gene Drive Research in Non-Human Organisms: Recommendations for Responsible Conduct, Division on Earth and Life Studies, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, and Board on Life Sciences. Gene Drives on the Horizon: Advancing Science, Navigating Uncertainty, and Aligning Research with Public Values. National Academies Press, 2016.

Committee on Gene Drive Research in Non-Human Organisms: Recommendations for Responsible Conduct, Division on Earth and Life Studies, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, and Board on Life Sciences. Gene Drives on the Horizon: Advancing Science, Navigating Uncertainty, and Aligning Research with Public Values. National Academies Press, 2016.

Committee on Gene Drive Research in Non-Human Organisms: Recommendations for Responsible Conduct, Division on Earth and Life Studies, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, and Board on Life Sciences. Gene Drives on the Horizon: Advancing Science, Navigating Uncertainty, and Aligning Research with Public Values. National Academies Press, 2016.

Genetically Engineered Organisms Public Issues Education Project. Washington, DC: Library of Congress, 2003.

Macer, Darryl R. J. Attitudes to genetic engineering: Japanese and international comparisons. Eubios Ethics Institute, 1992.

(Editor), Edna F. Einsiedel, and Frank Timmermans (Editor), eds. Crossing over: Genomics in the Public Arena. University of Calgary Press, 2006.

The Novo report: Attitudes about genetic engineering in the context of American culture. New York, N.Y. (110 E. 59th St., New York 10022): Research & Forecasts, Inc., 1987.