Relevant bibliographies by topics / Genghis Khan

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters
  5. Conference papers
  6. Reports

Academic literature on the topic 'Genghis Khan'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 15 June 2025

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Genghis Khan.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Genghis Khan"

1

Tadjiyevna, Yakubova Dilorom, and Boborahimov Shohruh Innoyatillo Oglu. "MONGOLIA'S INVASION OF THE KHOREZMSHOHS." International Journal Of History And Political Sciences 03, no. 06 (2023): 29–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.37547/ijhps/volume03issue06-06.

Full text
Abstract:
In the history of Uzbek statehood The Khorezmshahs, who were of great importance, were a state with great borders. Under such conditions, in the early 13th century, Genghis Khan united the Mongols in a single state on the territory of present day Mongolia. The territories of the two great kingdoms remained adjacent, and so he wanted to expand his territory even further. Gengis Khan and Khorezmshah Alouddin Muhammad began to prepare for battle againts each other. This article discusses the relations of Genghis Khan and the Mongols with the Khorezmshah state, their attacks and their consequences.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Egorova, Olga Gennadievna, and Dmitry Aleksandrovich Belyakov. "Artistic interpretations of Genghis Khan’s image in the English-language literature of the XX and XXI centuries." Philology. Issues of Theory and Practice 16, no. 8 (2023): 2524–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.30853/phil20230396.

Full text
Abstract:
The study aims to identify the most common artistic models of Genghis Khan’s representation in the English-language literature of various genres of the XX and XXI centuries using the example of works by major English-speaking authors. The researchers analysed the following works: ‘Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World’ by Jack Weatherford, ‘Genghis Khan: His Life and Legacy’ by Paul Ratchnevsky, ‘Genghis Khan: The Man Who Conquered the World’ by Frank McLynn, ‘Chinggis Khan (Makers of the Muslim World)’ by Michal Biran, ‘The Earth Is the Lord’s: A Tale of the Rise of Genghis Khan’ by Taylor Caldwell, ‘On the Trail of Genghis Khan: An Epic Journey Through the Land of the Nomads’ by Tim Cope, the ‘Conqueror’ series by Conn Iggulden, ‘Genghis Khan: Emperor of All Men’ by Harold Lamb, ‘Genghis Khan’ by James Chambers, ‘Genghis Khan: Life, Death, and Resurrection’ by John Man. The scientific novelty lies in the emphasis on the specifics of the image of the famous conqueror in English-language literatures, which discovered Genghis Khan as a character much later than Soviet literature in Russian. The results showed that the English-speaking authors are interested in the life path of Genghis Khan starting from his early years and ending with a mystical death. At every stage of his life, the authors set their sights on unraveling a certain mystery: the mystery of his elevation, the mystery of many victories, the mystery of authority, the mystery of death, etc. Unlike Soviet authors, who, for obvious reasons, were interested in Genghis Khan more as a ferocious conqueror, the English-speaking authors want to understand him as a person and trace his success story.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Debord, Bernard. "Genghis Khan rides again." Index on Censorship 20, no. 7 (1991): 20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03064229108535151.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Breitman, Richard. "Hitler and Genghis Khan." Journal of Contemporary History 25, no. 2 (1990): 337–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002200949002500209.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Dampilova, Liudmila S. "Маркеры этничности в песнях бурят о Чингис-хане". Монголоведение (Монгол судлал) 14, № 1 (2022): 212–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.22162/2500-1523-2022-1-212-222.

Full text
Abstract:
Introduction. The article analyzes legends and songs about Genghis Khan recorded in expeditions across Buryatia, Mongolia and China — to further compare them with related archival and published materials. Goals. The work aims at identifying distinctive features inherent to folklore texts dealing with Genghis Khan in different linguistic and ethnic environments. The issue of revival of ethnic consciousness actualizes insights into ethnic culture and its peculiarities. Methods. The paper is first to consider local versions of Buryat songs about Genghis Khan in a comparative aspect. Semantic contextual analysis proves instrumental in revealing ethnic markers. Results. The article discusses songs about Genghis Khan of both local and general Mongol significance. Songs about kinship with Genghis Khan and the ancestral homeland of Buryats — Nayan Nava — have a local and specifically tribal meaning being connected to the history of the Khori Buryats proper. Songs with a motif of chase contain parallels with plots of all-Mongol toponymic legends. The song titled ‘Two Steeds of Bogdo’ (Bur. Bogdyn hoyor zagal) and known among the Mongolic peoples dates back to the Mongolian medieval literature — The Tale of Two Steeds of Genghis Khan. The songs are examined in comparison with legends and The Secret History of the Mongols. Conclusion. Contextual analysis of songs about Genghis Khan along with legends and The Secret History reveals a hidden deep layer in the semantics of texts. The songs of Russia and Mongolia’s Buryats identify ancient roots of the motif of kinship with Genghis Khan that date back to the historical homeland. The Shinehen Buryats of the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (China) have shown a perfect preservation of authentic materials in an isolated environment, while Mongolia’s Buryats experienced a transformation and song borrowings in the close ethnic culture. The paper also concludes there are virtually no such songs about Genghis Khan among modern Buryats of Russia. In general, the comparative analysis of Buryat songs about the legendary warlord proves those had been created in their historical homeland of present-day Russia to be further preserved both in the alien (China) and kindred (Mongolia) ethnocultural environments.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Chogt, N. "A Question Related to the History of Genghis Khan's Early Stage: Focused on the Comparison between the Records of “The Secret History of the Mongols” and “Jami' al-tawarikh(Compendium of Chronicles)”." Korean Association for Mongolian Studies 74 (August 31, 2023): 123–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.17292/kams.2023.74.123.

Full text
Abstract:
“The Secret History of Mongolia” is the first book to record the history and life of Genghis Khan. However, the descriptions about Genghis Khan are sometimes accompanied by literary exaggeration and fiction, which brings certain difficulties in correctly understood the history of Genghis Khan. Therefore, it is necessary to distinguish and analyze it, select the false and preserve the truth, and restore the original appearance of Genghis Khan's history. This thesis mainly puts forward new insights for how to understand the historicity of “The Secret History of Mongolia” by re-discussing the issue of the history of Genghis Khan's early stage, which is the history of The Tayichiud tribe abandoning its widows and orphans and taking away its subordinate after Yesugei Baghatur died, based on the Yuan Dynasty documents such as “Secret History of Mongolia,” Jami' al-tawarikh (Compendium of Chronicles), “Shengwu Qinzheng Lu,” and other Yuan Dynasty documents.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Williams, John Price, and Tim Severin. "In Search of Genghis Khan." Geographical Journal 158, no. 3 (1992): 339. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3060323.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Kwok, D. W. Y., and George Lane. "Genghis Khan and Mongol Rule." History Teacher 39, no. 1 (2005): 128. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/30036757.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Drobyshev, Yu I. "Tangut captivity of Genghis Khan." Orientalistica 4, no. 2 (2021): 380–405. http://dx.doi.org/10.31696/2618-7043-2021-4-2-380-405.

Full text
Abstract:
The article puts forward a hypothesis about the capture of Genghis Khan by the Tanguts during his attack on the Tangut state of Xi Xia in 1207-1208. The only source that provides this information is the work of Guillaume de Rubruk, who visited Mongolia in 1253-1255. No supporting information has yet been found, however, there is no data that would completely exclude the possibility of Genghis Khan being captured. On the basis of Chinese, Mongolian, Persian, Tibetan, and Tangut sources, the author reconstructs a picture of the Mongol invasions into Xi Xia in search of the moment when this event had the maximum chance to occur. Special attention is paid to the goals that the Mongols may have set in each of the five documented attacks on the Tangut country. Analysis of the sources suggests that the nature of these raids changed dramatically after the second Tangut campaign of 1207-1208: predatory raids were replaced by a full-scale war, which ended with the submission of Xi Xia to the Mongols. Perhaps the reason for this was revenge for the stay of the Mongol leader in Tangut captivity. The possibility of Genghis Khan being held captive in the Chin Empire is also briefly discussed, which is also only reported in a thirteenth-century Chinese diplomat's essay
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Salomon, Hilel B., and Tim Severin. "In Search of Genghis Khan." History Teacher 27, no. 3 (1994): 368. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/494787.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Genghis Khan"

1

Deat, Dimitri. "De la tribu à l'empire : le rôle des représentations primitives dans le processus de politisation nomade. L'influence du loup clanique dans la construction et l'expansion de l'Empire mongol de Gengis Khan." Thesis, Lyon, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017LYSE3022/document.

Full text
Abstract:
Participant à une certaine opacité dans son étude générale, la civilisation nomade des steppes Eurasiatiques fut longtemps considérée comme apolitique et symboliquement ancrée dans la barbarie. Cependant, cette dernière demeure un sanctuaire d’investigation scientifique à l’intérieur duquel le politique s’est considérablement manifesté par la création de nombreuses confédérations tribales. Opérant son entrée dans l’histoire de l’humanité en tant qu’élément perturbateur des sociétés sédentaires, les peuples de la Haute Asie ont ainsi participé, durant près de deux mille ans, à la chute, au bouleversement ou au renouveau des plus grandes civilisations. La création et l’expansion de l’empire gengiskhanide, dès le début du XIIIème siècle a permis de démontrer la faculté pour ces populations de pasteurs nomades d’opérer d’importantes modifications au sein même de leur morphologie sociale, et ce pour les besoins du politique et de la guerre vers l’extérieure. Cependant examinée de l’intérieur, cette civilisation atypique n’en reste pas moins problématique, notamment du fait de son actualisation culturelle. Cette dernière, accomplie au travers de concepts socio culturels alliant pensée animiste, spiritualité chamanique et utilisation de représentations sociales à aspects zoomorphiques, ne semble rentrer dans aucune grille de lecture impériale. La symbolique du loup est ainsi devenue omniprésente dans l’évolution de la morphologie tribale altaïque, participant à une unification massive des tribus turco-mongoles sous l’hégémonie hiérocratique de Gengis Khan. Devenu progressivement élément mythologique attracteur, l’animal carnassier s’est ainsi frayé une place de choix au sein de la mentalité collective nomade, participant directement au chamboulement de la morphologie tribale, pour les besoins du politique et de l’expansion de la civilisation des steppes en terres sédentaires. Au delà de la simple utilisation lycanthropique de l’ancêtre clanique, sa symbolique, réutilisée habilement par Gengis Khan, est en mesure de démontrer à la fois le dynamisme politique à apposer aux sociétés considérées à tort comme «primitives», tout comme l’instauration d’une identité sociale et d’une idéologie guerrière prédatrices. Etablissant de ce fait l’entité nomade comme antagonique mais complémentaire avec la pensée et l’histoire humaine sédentaire<br>Participating in a certain opacity in it’s general study, the nomadic civilization of Eurasian steppe was long regarded as non-political and symbolically rooted in barbary. However, the latter remains a sanctuary of scientific investigation within which the political has significantly expressed itself by the creation of many Tribal confederations. It’s entry operates in the history of mankind as a disruptive element of sedentary societies. People of High Asia participated for almost two thousand years to the collapse, disruption or renewal of the world’s greatest civilizations. From the beginning of the 13th century the creation and expansion of the gengiskhanid empire enabled the demonstration of the faculty of these nomad pastors. They operated major changes in their social morphology for the political needs and because of the war outside. Examined from the interior, this atypical civilization remains questions. This is a result of cultural updating. The latter, accomplished through social and cultural concepts combining animist thinking, shamanist spirituality and the utilisation of social representations with zoomorphic aspects doesn’t fit any imperial cases studies. The symbolic representation of the wolf became ubiquitous in the development of the Tribal-Altaic morphology and participation of a massive unification of Turko-Mongolian clans under the hierocratic hegemony of Gengis Khan. The carnivorous animal had progressively became administred as an attraction mythological element and cleared the way to the Tribal collective mentality. This participating directly to the disruption of Tribal morphology for the political needs and expansion of the steppe civilization in settled population territories. Beyond the single lycanthropic utilization of the Tribal ancestor, its symbolism skillfully reused by Gengis Khan demonstrates simultaneously the political dynamism to pin on societes mistakenly considered as « primitive », and the establishment of a predatory social identity and war-making ideology created de facto the nomadic identity as an antagonist but complementary to the social wores and history of human sedentary<br>Судалгааны хувьд ерөнхийдөө зарим тайлбарлахад амаргүй байдлыг хуваалцахад, Евро- Азийн тал нутгийн соёлыг урт хугацааны туршид зэрлэг бүдүүлэг байдалтай байсан хэмээн үздэг. Гэсэн хэдий ч сүүлд оршин байсан ариун дагшин газраас шинжлэх ухааны судалгаа авч үзвэл олон овог аймгийн нэгтгэн байгуулсан улс төрийн байдал нь нэлээд тод томруун харуулж өгдөг байна. Хүн төрлөгтөний түүхийн хувьд авч үзвэл уналт, өөрчлөлтийн зөрчилдөөн эсвэл илүү том нөлөө бүхий соёл иргэншлээр шинэчлэл явагдсан байдал зэргээр сууршмал нийгмийн хөгжил нь төв азийн нүүдэлчин улс орнуудын оролцоо нөлөөгөөр 2000 орчим жил тасалдсан. Улс төрийн болон гадагш хандсан дайны шаардлагаар Чингис хааны эзэнт гүрний байгуулалт болон тэлэлт нь 13-р зууны эхэн үед нийгмийн бүтцэд чухал өөрчөлтүүдийг бий болгоход малчин нүүдэлчид их нөлөө үүрэг гүйцэтгэсэн гэдгийг илэрхий харуулж өгдөг. Гэвч дотоод байдлыг нь ухан авч үзвэл энэхүү өвөрмөц соёл багагүй асуудалтай байсан бөгөөд дашрамд дурдахад соёлын өөрчлөлтийн нөлөө ч бас илэрхий байв. Энэхүү нийгэм соёлын үзэл баримтлалыг нь өргөнөөр авч үзвэл сүнслэгжүүлсэн үзэл санаа, бөөгийн сүнслэг үзэл болон амьтны сүнстэй холбосон үзэл санаан дээр тулгуурласан нийгмийн төлөөллийг ашигласан зэрэг нь эзэнт гүрний утга зохиолын хүрээнд оруулсан байдаг. Чингис хааны доор Түрэг-монголчуудын овгуудын өргөнөөр нэгтгэсэн байдлыг хамруулан Алтайн овгийн хэл зүйн хувьсал өөрчлөлтөнд чонын билиг тэмдгийн талаар хаа сайгүй дурдагдсан байдаг. Бодлогын зорилгоор болон соёлын алхамын тэлэлтүүд сууршиж, нүүдэлчдийн ерөнхий сэтгэлгээнд үлгэр домгийн хэлбэрүүд аажмаар багасаж махчин амьтны талаарх сэдэв түгэж эхлэсэн бөгөөд овгийн хэл зүйд шууд өөрчлөлтөнд нөлөө үзүүлэв. Эртний отог аймгийн энгийн бэлэг тэмдэг болсон чонын утгыг Чингис Хаанаар дамжуулан цааш улс төрийн хүч, итгэл үнэмшлийг харуулах арга замаар ухаалгаар дахин ашиглагдаж ирсэн байдал нь хэсэг бүлгийнхний дүгнэлтэнд буруугаар тайлбарлагдах шалтгаан болсон бөгөөд балар эртний дайтан эзлэн түрэмгийлэгч хэмээн тэд авч үзэх болсон бөгөөд нүүдэлчдийн энэхүү байдлыг хувиа хичээсэн байдлаар оршин тогтнож байсан хэдий ч сууршмал соёлын үзэл баримтлал холбоотой зүйлс бас байсан байна хэмээн үзжээ
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Favereau, Marie. "La Horde d'Or de 1377 à 1502 : aux sources d'un siècle "sans histoire"." Paris 4, 2004. http://www.theses.fr/2004PA040184.

Full text
Abstract:
La tradition historiographique a établi que la Horde d'Or (1224-1502), ulūs ğočīde, issue de l'empire fondé par Gengis Khan, connut un déclin rapide, amorcé dès la deuxième moitié du XIVème siècle. Les historiens ne s'attachent pas à définir les causes profondes de la chute de cet Etat, mais à décrire des phénomènes qui leurs apparaissent comme évidents. Pour certains, la Horde périclita après les invasions timourides à la fin du XIVème ; pour d'autres, elle ne sut faire face à la montée en puissance moscovite dont les deux grandes victoires mythiques, celle de Kulikogo (1380) et celle de l'Ougra (1480), scandent les dernières heures du " joug tatar " ; pour la plupart, sa décadence inéluctable est due à la fragmentation de la maison dynastique ğočīde et à l'apparition de khanats établis autour des principales cités de l'ulūs. Nos recherches, fondées sur une lecture approfondie des sources textuelles et en particulier des documents officiels des khans, ont permis de remettre en cause la conception historique traditionnelle de la disparition prématurée de la Horde d'Or. La mise à jour du discours khanial s'organise autour de l'expression d'un mythe fondant la légitimité des descendants ğočīdes. La confrontation de ce discours avec les regards extérieurs (regards que l'on peut cerner à travers les historiographies timouride, čagatayide, šaybānide et russe) nous a permis de saisir quelles étaient les grandes problématiques induisant une nécessaire relecture de l'histoire de la Horde d'Or au XVème siècle<br>In the historiographical tradition, it has been an established fact that the Golden Horde, which descended from the empire founded by Genghis Khan, experienced an abrupt decline which started in the last half of the fourteenth century. The historians have hardly attempted to define the underlying causes of the fall of this state. They have been more concerned with the description of phenomena which have appeared as obvious to them. For some of them, the Horde collapsed after the Timurid invasions at the end of the fourteenth century; others have considered that the Horde failed to position itself facing the potential ascent of the Muscovites whose mythical victories, the one of Kouli and the one of Lougra, announced the end of the "Tatar Yoke". For most of them, its ineluctable decline is due to the splitting-up of the Godschid dynastic house and to the appearance of Khanates around the main citie of the Ulus. Our research which is based on an underlying reading of the textual sources and especially of the official documents of the Khans, has permitted us to challenge the traditional historical conception of a premature disappearance of the Golden Horde. The updating of the khanial discourse must be related to the expression of a myth which sets up the legitimacy of the Godschid descendants. The confrontation of the Khanial discourse with the foreign viewpoints (those viewpoints are fully discernable in the Timurid, Čagatay, Sheybanid historiographies as well as in the Russian historiographies) has allowed us to perceive the main issues, inducing an indispensable rereading of the history of the Golden Horde during its fifteenth century
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Dalaudière, Isabelle Françoise. "Julius Overhoff (1898-1977), un écrivain témoin de son temps : le Monde avec Gengis Khan comme roman historique de la guerre froide." Thesis, Metz, 2008. http://www.theses.fr/2008METZ011L/document.

Full text
Abstract:
Né à Vienne en 1898, Julius Overhoff est l’auteur d’une douzaine de monographies – romans historiques, récits de voyages, recueils de poésies, roman épistolaire, essai autobiographique, recueil de nouvelles. Son œuvre s’étend de la période d’avant-guerre jusqu’aux années 1980 avec la publication de trois ouvrages posthumes. Outre son activité littéraire, Julius Overhoff occupait de hautes fonctions au sein de l’industrie chimique en Allemagne, qui l’amenèrent à parcourir le monde entier. La thèse montre que la prise de conscience des problèmes de son époque se reflète dans l’œuvre d’Overhoff. L’étude s’appuie sur l’analyse du roman historique Le Monde avec Gengis Khan paru en 1959 pour illustrer les intentions de l’auteur. Après avoir présenté la vie et l’œuvre d’Overhoff, le travail retrace les circonstances de la rédaction et de la publication de cette œuvre. Il analyse les conceptions historiques d’Overhoff qui l’ont conduit à écrire ce roman ayant pour cadre le XIIIe siècle, mais dont l’objet est de présenter la situation de l’Europe dans la seconde moitié du XXe siècle et de proposer des solutions pour retrouver sa place dans le monde. C’est dans cette perspective que s’inscrit l’analyse des tableaux constituant le roman. Après une analyse des procédés mis en œuvre par l’auteur pour réaliser son objectif, la thèse s’achève par un examen de la réception de l’œuvre<br>Born in Vienna in 1898, Julius Overhoff wrote a dozen monographs - historical novels, travel accounts, collections of poems, an epistolary novel, an autobiographical essay and a collection of short stories. His oeuvre spans the period from pre-World War I to the 1980’s, when three of his books were published posthumously. Besides his literary activities, Julius Overhoff occupied senior positions in the German chemical industry, which led him to travel all over the world. This doctoral thesis shows that Overhoff’s awareness of the problems of his time is reflected in his writings. An analysis of the historical novel “Die Welt mit Dschingiz-Chan”, published in 1959, illustrates Overhoff’s intentions. After a presentation of Overhoff’s life and work, this thesis recounts the circumstances in which the author’s work was written and published. It then analyses Overhoff’s historical views, which led him to write this novel set in the 13th Century but aiming at showing Europe’s situation in the second half of the 20th Century and offering possible solutions for it to regain its former position in the world. The different scenes of the novel are analysed from this perspective. The thesis then looks at the techniques used by the author to reach his aim and finishes with an analysis of the book’s reception
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Dalaudière, Isabelle Françoise Grunewald Michel Béhar Pierre. "Julius Overhoff (1898-1977) : un écrivain témoin de son temps le monde avec Gengis Khan comme roman historique de la guerre froide /." Metz : Université Metz, 2008. ftp://ftp.scd.univ-metz.fr/pub/Theses/2008/Dalaudiere.Isabelle.LMZ0811.pdf.

Full text
Abstract:
Reproduction de : Thèse de doctorat : Langues et littératures étrangères-Allemand : Metz : 2008. Reproduction de : Thèse de doctorat : Langues et littératures étrangères-Allemand : de la Sarre-Sarrebruck : 2008.<br>Thèse soutenue en co-tutelle. Titre provenant de l'écran-titre. Notes bibliographiques. Index.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

CHEN, CHIUNG-HAN, and 陳泂翰. "Media Effect of Fitness Center on Social Media: A Case of Genghis Khan Fitness Center." Thesis, 2019. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/sj6q59.

Full text
Abstract:
碩士<br>國立臺北教育大學<br>體育學系碩士班<br>107<br>Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of message content vividness and message headline type on the fitness club fan page on media effects. Methods: This study adopted the fan page of the Genghis Khan Fitness Center as the research participant. The content analysis method was employed to analyze 450 messages on the fan page from January 6th, 2014 to December 8th, 2016. In addition, SPSS 18 was used to carry out descriptive statistics and two-way ANOVA. Results: 1. The top three most common message contents in Information vividness ranked in order are “text+illustration”, “text+video”, and “only text”. The message type ranked number one is “statement”, followed by “exclamatory”, “imperative”, and “inquisitive”; 2. As for media effects, posts inclined toward sponsorship and social welfare issues received more likes, while posts inclined toward competitor reviews received more comment and posts inclined toward product introduction and marketing activities received more shares ; 3. The Information vividness and message types showed no significant interaction with “like”, “post”, and “share”, while post-hoc analysis derived at no significant results. Conclusion: In order to enhance fan page attention, it is suggested that Information vividness be presented in diverse ways, and message types be used based on fan page management styles and targets, sports sponsorship and social welfare issues should be used to increase the attention of potential customer groups, fan adhesion should be increased through professional technical exchanges, and qualification criteria and incentive strategies should be put to proper use to increase message exposure.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Genghis Khan"

1

Demi, ed. Genghis Khan. Marshall Cavendish, 2009.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Hoàng, Michel. Genghis Khan. New Amsterdam, 1991.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Hoàng, Michel. Genghis Khan. Saqi Books, 1990.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Lister, R. P. Genghis Khan /$cR.P. Lister. Dorset Press, 1989.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Ying, Zhou, ed. Chengjisihan zhuan: Genghis Khan. Chang jiang wen yi chu ban she, 2011.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Severin, Timothy. In search of Genghis Khan. Collier Books, 1993.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Langley, Andrew. Genghis Khan and the Mongols. Wayland, 1987.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Wang, Chisheng. Genghis Khan: The mighty warrior. Asiapac, 1997.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

George, Lane. Genghis Khan and Mongol rule. Hackett Pub. Co., 2009.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Cooper, Brian H. The diaries of Genghis Khan. House of Caladan, 1996.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Genghis Khan"

1

Strickland, John. "Genghis Khan." In Government Leaders, Military Rulers and Political Activists. Routledge, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315063706-67.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Khan, Abdul Qayyum. "Genghis Khan and his dynasty." In Understanding Afghanistan. Routledge India, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003198376-2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

"Genghis Khan." In The Teddy Bear Chronicles. The Chinese University of Hong Kong Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1cftj14.25.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Kalan, Ekrem. "Cengiz Han Ve Bütüncül Dünya Tasavvuru." In Cengiz Han ve Mirası. Turkish Academy of Science, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.53478/tuba.2021.022.

Full text
Abstract:
The Mongol Empire, which emerged as a result of the Mongol unity under the leadership of Genghis Khan has left its mark on world history as the world’s largest land empire ever. It is as difficult to establishing establish such an enormous state and to keep it alive. For this reason, thanks to the public diplomacy, which was laid down by Genghis Khan and passed on to future generations with the Steppe Law, which is known as the Genghis Law, it has succeeded in attaining the identity of a world empire politically, economically, and culturally. It is worth mentioning that the foundations of this policy put forward by Genghis Khan correspond to the Turkic perception of world domination. As Genghis Khan believed in one God and one state as is the case according to Chinese and the Turkic state traditions. He put forward a holistic worldview in political, economic, and cultural terms: Genghis Khan’s successors also continued to further his vision in all the lands they conquered, and especially in Eurasia which they dominated. After the second half of the XIIIth century, Mongol Empire ruled in Eurasia for more than a century and has been one of the first and most important examples of the holistic worldview with the policies followed by the Mongolian Khans.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Tuğrul, Mehmet, and Cem Korkut. "Cengiz Han’ın İktisat Düşüncesi ve Mirası." In Cengiz Han ve Mirası. Turkish Academy of Science, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.53478/tuba.2021.027.

Full text
Abstract:
"The first date the Mongolian name was used in historical sources is the VII. century. Mongols were considered an insignificant tribe in this period. The use of the Mongolian name as a state and dynasty coincides with the period of Genghis Khan. Mongols had very close relations with the Turks during the periods when they emerged as a political power, and these two nations were influenced by each other in many ways during the Great Hun, Göktürks and Uyghurs periods. The period when the Mongols played their main role in the world history scene was during the Mongol Empire established by Temüjin. Temüjin gathered the Mongol tribes under a single state administration and received the title of Genghis Khan. The spreading momentum at the time of Genghis Khan enabled the Mongols to establish one of the largest empires in history. So much so that this empire dominated about a quarter of the world. Most researchers tend to explain these expansionist activities of Genghis Khan and his legacy for the successors with barbarism and brute force. However, this explanation is inadequate not only in many respects but also in terms of understanding Genghis Khan’s economic activities and the administrative system he established. The most important reason for this is that the sources related to Genghis Khan period are mostly insufficient. In this study, existing sources will be examined from the perspective of economic history. In addition, the Laws of Genghis Khan (Yassa) will be analyzed in terms of economy. This study analyzes the economic activities of Genghis Khan and the economic structure of the Mongol Empire at that time."
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Curley, Edwin. "Kissinger, Spinoza, and Genghis Khan." In The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza. Cambridge University Press, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ccol0521392357.008.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

"From Genghis Khan to Napoleon." In Escape from Rome. Princeton University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvg25294.11.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Curley, Edwin. "Kissinger, Spinoza, and Genghis Khan." In The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781316156186.009.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Yuvalı, Abdulkadir. "Cengiz Han ve Evlatları Dönemindeki Merkezileştirme Faaliyetleri." In Cengiz Han ve Mirası. Turkish Academy of Science, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.53478/tuba.2021.023.

Full text
Abstract:
"Genghis Khan is the genius of the century he lived in and the founder of the greatest known political establishment in human history. In addition, the name Mongolian-Turkish Empire has been used since the beginning of this great empire founded by Genghis Khan, which was based on the Turkish state tradition. Horse-riding (equestrian) nomadic lifestyle that has been practiced for centuries in this geography has been the cultural and political basis of this empire. However, over time, they took their place in history as established political organizations. Therefore, this period is defined as the centralization period of the Mongolian-Turkish Empire. Genghis Khan’s childhood passed with troubles and his youth with unimaginable struggles. It is because Timuçin did not experience a life preparing him to the throne, like the children of rulers. Genghis Khan’s struggle was with his own tribe and boy, budun and other tribes in the region. In the following period, he organized an expedition on the Chinese Empire, which was a source of threat, danger and even booty for the horse-riding-nomadic peoples in Central Asia, and subsequently, he launched a western expedition. Genghis Khan, while still alive, shared his country among his sons by the method of Ulus Verme. Genghis Khan’s practice of centralization became more systematic during the periods of his son Ögedey Khan and his grandson Mengü Khan. The struggles between the sons of Cuci and the sons of Tuluy in the West, namely the Golden Horde-Ilhanli, following are themes touched upon in this study. Because the Ilkhanate, Byzantine and Papacy were forming a bloc politically in the Western world and a similar bloc formation occurred between the Golden Horde, Seljuks of Turkey and Mamluks in Egypt in the same period."
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

"ISLAMISATION." In From Genghis Khan to Tamerlane. Yale University Press, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/jj.9421075.10.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Genghis Khan"

1

Zolkhoev, Boris V. "Discussion on the birth date of Genghis Khan." In Eurasian paradigm of Russia: values, ideas and experience. Buryat State University Publishing Department, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.18101/978-5-9793-0814-2-68-71.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

DAMPILOVA, L. S., and N. DAMBIYHORLOO. "MYTHOLOGICAL MOTIVES IN LEGENDS AND STORIES ABOUT GENGHIS KHAN." In Scientific conference, devoted to the 95th anniversary of the Republic of Buryatia. Publishing House of the Buryat Scientific Center of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Science, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.30792/978-5-7925-0521-6-2018-279-281.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Lin, Albert Yu-Min. "The search for Genghis Khan: Using modern tools to hunt for an ancient past." In 2010 IEEE Aerospace Conference. IEEE, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/aero.2010.5447038.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Monisova, I. "FEATURES OF RETROUTOPIA IN THE DRAMATURGY OF BULAT GAVRILOV." In VIII International Conference “Russian Literature of the 20th-21st Centuries as a Whole Process (Issues of Theoretical and Methodological Research)”. LCC MAKS Press, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.29003/m3733.rus_lit_20-21/227-230.

Full text
Abstract:
The play of the Russian-speaking Buryat playwright B. Gavrilov “Genghis Khan” (2001) is considered from the point of view of its re-interpretation with an idealizing message of the personality and activities of the founder of the Mongol Empire. The ruler is shown as a sage, comprehending and realizing his mystical purpose. In this coordinate system, the capital of Khara-Khorin acquires the features of an ideal city, symbolizing the idea of the unity of peoples and cultures, and play genre is complicated by elements of retro-utopia.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Arral, Azizulloh. "BABUR WAS KING IN KABUL." In The Impact of Zahir Ad-Din Muhammad Bobur’s Literary Legacy on the Advancement of Eastern Statehood and Culture. Alisher Navoi' Tashkent state university of Uzbek language and literature, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.52773/bobur.conf.2023.25.09/khxj1687.

Full text
Abstract:
Zahirad-Din Muhammad Babur, who was associated with Kabul for about twenty-five years of his forty-seven years of life, gained fame as the royal poet of Kabul in the late XVth and early XVIthcenturies. Despite the fact that Zahirad-Din Muhammad Babur reached Amir Temur on his father's side and Genghis Khan on his mother's side, he mentions these two relationships in his famous book "Baburi Tuzuki" and calls himself a Turk (Uzbek). After Uzbek Babur was defeated several times by Shaybani Khan, he was forced to emigrate from Ferghana to Kabul, the current capital of Afghanistan, in order to try his luck in Kabulistan.Here the people of Kabul (Kabulistan) welcomed Babur and Babur became the Uzbek king of Kabul and from there he invaded India to expand his rule. This brave cosmopolitan Turk/Uzbek world-goer was a clever poet, a brilliant writer and a powerful ruler -a king. Babur was 22 years old when he was crowned in Kabul, and Babur's nickname Mirza was changed to the title of Shah.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Shirizhik, V. "Leaderism as a form of government of nomadic peoples during the reign of genghis khan in the 13TH century." In International Scientific Conference "On the Way to a Stable World: Security and Sustainable Development". Global partnership on Development of Scientific Cooperation Limited Liability Company; Ron Bee & Associates, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.17809/02(2015)-13.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Chimedtseren, Gan-Ulzii. "PHILOSOPHICAL INTERPRETATION OF THE «SHASTRA ABOUT THE WISE CONVERSATION OF AN ORPHAN BOY WITH THE NINE COMMANDERS OF GENGHIS KHAN» (EARLY 13TH CENTURY) AND MODERNITY." In Международная научная конференция "Мир Центральной Азии-V", посвященная 100-летию Института монголоведения,буддологии и тибетологии Сибирского отделения Российской академии наук. Сибирское отделение РАН, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.53954/9785604788981_551.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Martynov, Dmitry. "LIU RENHANG AND HERBERT G. WELLS." In 9th International Conference ISSUES OF FAR EASTERN LITERATURES. St. Petersburg State University, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.21638/11701/9785288062049.30.

Full text
Abstract:
Liu Renhang (1885–1938) was known as a Shanghai publicist and propagandist of Buddhism, vegetarianism and non-violence. Having been educated in Japan, he could not establish relations with Zhang Xun and Yan Xishan. He made a long journey to India and Indochina, talked with Rabindranath Tagore. In the 1920s and 1930s, Liu Renhang published over 30 books, mostly translated from Japanese and English. He published translations of L. N. Tolstoy’s short stories, books on hydrotherapy and yoga, and founded the Institute for the Cultivation of Joy in Shanghai (乐天 修养 馆). The main work of his life was Dongfang Datong Xuean in 6 juan, the creation of which was carried out in 1918–1924. The treatise was fully published in Shanghai in 1926, and was reprinted in 1991 and 2014. Its main content was to consider the classical ideals of Xiaokang and Datong, and the possibility of combining ideals with the realities of the modern world. Liu Renhang believed that the ideal of Datong Confucius and Kang Yuwei is fully compatible with Buddhist teachings. During the fifth session of the Central Election Commission of the Kuomintang of the fourth convocation (1934), he tried to announce at the meeting a petition on the introduction of the principle of Great Unity in international relations. In 1938, he created the utopian commune Datong in his native village, and tried to interest Zhou Enlai and Dong Biu with his theories. In the Dongfang Datong Xuean treatise, Liu Renhang introduced the “history of the future”, which was influenced by H. G. Wells’ globalist and Fabian ideas. Liu Renhang directly referred to his novel The War in the Air in conclusion to his own treatise. Like Wells, Liu looked with pessimism on the prospects of modern mankind, and called for the emergence of a “modern Genghis Khan”, who would ruin the world, on the ashes of which the sprout of a new Great Unity would rise.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Reports on the topic "Genghis Khan"

1

Ramirez, Joe E., and Jr. Genghis Khan and Maneuver Warfare. Defense Technical Information Center, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada378208.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Taylor, William S. Genghis Khan: Leadership for the Airland Battle. Defense Technical Information Center, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada192619.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography