Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Genome size evolution / Journal articles

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Genome size evolution.

Journal articles on the topic 'Genome size evolution'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 1 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Genome size evolution.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Redi, C. A., and E. Capanna. "Genome Size Evolution: Sizing Mammalian Genomes." Cytogenetic and Genome Research 137, no. 2-4 (2012): 97–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000338820.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Hardie, David C., and Paul DN Hebert. "Genome-size evolution in fishes." Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 61, no. 9 (2004): 1636–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/f04-106.

Full text

Abstract:

Fishes possess both the largest and smallest vertebrate genomes, but the evolutionary significance of this variation is unresolved. The present study provides new genome-size estimates for more than 500 species, with a focus on the cartilaginous and ray-finned fishes. These results confirm that genomes are smaller in ray-finned than in cartilaginous fishes, with the exception of polyploids, which account for much genome-size variation in both groups. Genome-size diversity in ray-finned fishes is not related to metabolic rate, but is positively correlated with egg diameter, suggesting linkages

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

TURNER, BRUCE J. "Evolution of genome size." Journal of Heredity 78, no. 1 (1987): 61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a110315.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Biémont, C. "Genome size evolution: Within-species variation in genome size." Heredity 101, no. 4 (2008): 297–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2008.80.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Murai, Koji, and Koichiro Tsunewaki. "Chloroplast Genome Evolution in the Genus Avena." Genetics 116, no. 4 (1987): 613–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/genetics/116.4.613.

Full text

Abstract:

ABSTRACT The genus Avena contains five different chloroplast genomes, I-V. A physical map of chloroplast (ct) DNA of Avena sativa (type I chloroplast genome) was constructed using three restriction endonucleases, PstI, SalI and SmaI. This genome is ca. 135.5 kbp in size, and contains two inverted repeats of ca. 22.5 kbp each, separated by a large (ca. 79.0 kbp) and small (ca. 12.5 kbp) single copy region. The rbcL gene which codes for the large subunit of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase, was located in the map. Restriction fragment patterns of all five chloroplast genomes were compared,

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Ahuja, M. Raj, and David B. Neale. "Evolution of Genome Size in Conifers." Silvae Genetica 54, no. 1-6 (2005): 126–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/sg-2005-0020.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractConifers are the most widely distributed group of gymnosperms in the world. They have large genome size (1C-value) compared with most animal and plant species. The genome size ranges from ~6,500 Mb to ~37,000 Mb in conifers. How and why conifers have evolved such large genomes is not understood. The conifer genome contains ~75% highly repetitive DNA. Most of the repetitive DNA is composed of non-coding DNA, including ubiquitous transposable elements. Conifers have relatively larger rDNA repeat units, larger gene families generated by gene duplications, larger nuclear volume, and perhap

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Leitch, Ilia J., Jeremy M. Beaulieu, Mark W. Chase, Andrew R. Leitch, and Michael F. Fay. "Genome Size Dynamics and Evolution in Monocots." Journal of Botany 2010 (June 17, 2010): 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/862516.

Full text

Abstract:

Monocot genomic diversity includes striking variation at many levels. This paper compares various genomic characters (e.g., range of chromosome numbers and ploidy levels, occurrence of endopolyploidy, GC content, chromosome packaging and organization, genome size) between monocots and the remaining angiosperms to discern just how distinctive monocot genomes are. One of the most notable features of monocots is their wide range and diversity of genome sizes, including the species with the largest genome so far reported in plants. This genomic character is analysed in greater detail, within a phy

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Sundberg, Lotta-Riina, and Katja Pulkkinen. "Genome size evolution in macroparasites." International Journal for Parasitology 45, no. 5 (2015): 285–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2014.12.007.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

DOVER, G. A. "The Evolution of Genome Size." Biochemical Society Transactions 15, no. 2 (1987): 307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/bst0150307.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Sessions, Stanley K. "The evolution of genome size." Cell 45, no. 4 (1986): 473–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(86)90278-3.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Eilam, T., Y. Anikster, E. Millet, J. Manisterski, O. Sagi-Assif, and M. Feldman. "Genome size and genome evolution in diploid Triticeae species." Genome 50, no. 11 (2007): 1029–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/g07-083.

Full text

Abstract:

One of the intriguing issues concerning the dynamics of plant genomes is the occurrence of intraspecific variation in nuclear DNA amount. The aim of this work was to assess the ranges of intraspecific, interspecific, and intergeneric variation in nuclear DNA content of diploid species of the tribe Triticeae (Poaceae) and to examine the relation between life form or habitat and genome size. Altogether, 438 plants representing 272 lines that belong to 22 species were analyzed. Nuclear DNA content was estimated by flow cytometry. Very small intraspecific variation in DNA amount was found between

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Bainard, Jillian D., Steven G. Newmaster, and Jessica M. Budke. "Genome size and endopolyploidy evolution across the moss phylogeny." Annals of Botany 125, no. 4 (2019): 543–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcz194.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Background and Aims Compared with other plant lineages, bryophytes have very small genomes with little variation across species, and high levels of endopolyploid nuclei. This study is the first analysis of moss genome evolution over a broad taxonomic sampling using phylogenetic comparative methods. We aim to determine whether genome size evolution is unidirectional as well as examine whether genome size and endopolyploidy are correlated in mosses. Methods Genome size and endoreduplication index (EI) estimates were newly generated using flow cytometry from moss samples collected in Can

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Ohri, Deepak. "Variation and Evolution of Genome Size in Gymnosperms." Silvae Genetica 70, no. 1 (2021): 156–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/sg-2021-0013.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Gymnosperms show a significantly higher mean (1C=18.16, 1Cx=16.80) and a narrow range (16.89-fold) of genome sizes as compared with angiosperms. Among the 12 families the largest ranges of 1C values is shown by Ephedraceae (4.73-fold) and Cupressaceae (4.45-fold) which are partly due to polyploidy as 1Cx values vary 2.41 and 1.37-fold respectively. In rest of the families which have only diploid taxa the range of 1C values is from 1.18-fold (Cycadaeae) to 4.36-fold (Podocarpaceae). The question is how gymnosperms acquired such big genome sizes despite the rarity of recent instances of

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Fischer, Stephan, Samuel Bernard, Guillaume Beslon, and Carole Knibbe. "A Model for Genome Size Evolution." Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 76, no. 9 (2014): 2249–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11538-014-9997-8.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Caspermeyer, J. "Testis Size Matters for Genome Evolution." Molecular Biology and Evolution 31, no. 6 (2014): 1638. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu100.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

LEITCH, I. J., J. M. BEAULIEU, K. CHEUNG, L. HANSON, M. A. LYSAK, and M. F. FAY. "Punctuated genome size evolution in Liliaceae." Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20, no. 6 (2007): 2296–308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01416.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Boussau, Bastien, Jeremy M. Brown, and Matthew K. Fujita. "NONADAPTIVE EVOLUTION OF MITOCHONDRIAL GENOME SIZE." Evolution 65, no. 9 (2011): 2706–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01322.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Kellner, Siri, Anja Spang, Pierre Offre, Gergely J. Szöllősi, Celine Petitjean, and Tom A. Williams. "Genome size evolution in the Archaea." Emerging Topics in Life Sciences 2, no. 4 (2018): 595–605. http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/etls20180021.

Full text

Abstract:

What determines variation in genome size, gene content and genetic diversity at the broadest scales across the tree of life? Much of the existing work contrasts eukaryotes with prokaryotes, the latter represented mainly by Bacteria. But any general theory of genome evolution must also account for the Archaea, a diverse and ecologically important group of prokaryotes that represent one of the primary domains of cellular life. Here, we survey the extant diversity of Bacteria and Archaea, and ask whether the general principles of genome evolution deduced from the study of Bacteria and eukaryotes

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

JOHNSTON, J. S. "Evolution of Genome Size in Brassicaceae." Annals of Botany 95, no. 1 (2005): 229–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci016.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Ohri, D., R. M. Fritsch, and P. Hanelt. "Evolution of genome size inAllium (Alliaceae)." Plant Systematics and Evolution 210, no. 1-2 (1998): 57–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00984728.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Organ, Chris L., and Andrew M. Shedlock. "Palaeogenomics of pterosaurs and the evolution of small genome size in flying vertebrates." Biology Letters 5, no. 1 (2008): 47–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2008.0491.

Full text

Abstract:

The two living groups of flying vertebrates, birds and bats, both have constricted genome sizes compared with their close relatives. But nothing is known about the genomic characteristics of pterosaurs, which took to the air over 70 Myr before birds and were the first group of vertebrates to evolve powered flight. Here, we estimate genome size for four species of pterosaurs and seven species of basal archosauromorphs using a Bayesian comparative approach. Our results suggest that small genomes commonly associated with flight in bats and birds also evolved in pterosaurs, and that the rate of ge

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Sela, Itamar, Yuri I. Wolf, and Eugene V. Koonin. "Theory of prokaryotic genome evolution." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113, no. 41 (2016): 11399–407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1614083113.

Full text

Abstract:

Bacteria and archaea typically possess small genomes that are tightly packed with protein-coding genes. The compactness of prokaryotic genomes is commonly perceived as evidence of adaptive genome streamlining caused by strong purifying selection in large microbial populations. In such populations, even the small cost incurred by nonfunctional DNA because of extra energy and time expenditure is thought to be sufficient for this extra genetic material to be eliminated by selection. However, contrary to the predictions of this model, there exists a consistent, positive correlation between the str

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

CHEN, Jian-Jun, and Ying WANG. "Recent progress in plant genome size evolution." Hereditas (Beijing) 31, no. 5 (2009): 464–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1005.2009.00464.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Caetano-Anollés, Gustavo. "Evolution of Genome Size in the Grasses." Crop Science 45, no. 5 (2005): 1809–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.0604.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Soltis, Douglas E., Pamela S. Soltis, Michael D. Bennett, and Ilia J. Leitch. "Evolution of genome size in the angiosperms." American Journal of Botany 90, no. 11 (2003): 1596–603. http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/ajb.90.11.1596.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Wang, Wenqin, Randall A. Kerstetter, and Todd P. Michael. "Evolution of Genome Size in Duckweeds (Lemnaceae)." Journal of Botany 2011 (July 28, 2011): 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/570319.

Full text

Abstract:

To extensively estimate the DNA content and to provide a basic reference for duckweed genome sequence research, the nuclear DNA content for 115 different accessions of 23 duckweed species was measured by flow cytometry (FCM) stained with propidium iodide as DNA stain. The 1C-value of DNA content in duckweed family varied nearly thirteen-fold, ranging from 150 megabases (Mbp) in Spirodela polyrhiza to 1,881 Mbp in Wolffia arrhiza. There is a continuous increase of DNA content in Spirodela, Landoltia, Lemna, Wolffiella, and Wolffia that parallels a morphological reduction in size. There is a sig

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Petrov, Dmitri A. "Mutational Equilibrium Model of Genome Size Evolution." Theoretical Population Biology 61, no. 4 (2002): 531–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/tpbi.2002.1605.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

ALBACH, D. C. "Genome Size Variation and Evolution in Veronica." Annals of Botany 94, no. 6 (2004): 897–911. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mch219.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Enke, N., R. Kunze, F. Pustahija, et al. "Genome size shifts: karyotype evolution inCrepissectionNeglectoides(Asteraceae)." Plant Biology 17, no. 4 (2015): 775–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/plb.12318.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Tsutsui, Neil D., Andrew V. Suarez, Joseph C. Spagna, and J. Spencer Johnston. "The evolution of genome size in ants." BMC Evolutionary Biology 8, no. 1 (2008): 64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-64.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Ng, Chin Hong, Soon Leong Lee, Lee Hong Tnah, Kevin Kit Siong Ng, Chai Ting Lee, and Maria Madon. "Genome size variation and evolution in Dipterocarpaceae." Plant Ecology & Diversity 9, no. 5-6 (2016): 437–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2016.1267274.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Elliott, Tyler A., and T. Ryan Gregory. "What's in a genome? The C-value enigma and the evolution of eukaryotic genome content." Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 370, no. 1678 (2015): 20140331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0331.

Full text

Abstract:

Some notable exceptions aside, eukaryotic genomes are distinguished from those of Bacteria and Archaea in a number of ways, including chromosome structure and number, repetitive DNA content, and the presence of introns in protein-coding regions. One of the most notable differences between eukaryotic and prokaryotic genomes is in size. Unlike their prokaryotic counterparts, eukaryotes exhibit enormous (more than 60 000-fold) variability in genome size which is not explained by differences in gene number. Genome size is known to correlate with cell size and division rate, and by extension with n

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Veleba, Adam, Petr Bureš, Lubomír Adamec, Petr Šmarda, Ivana Lipnerová, and Lucie Horová. "Genome size and genomic GC content evolution in the miniature genome-sized family Lentibulariaceae." New Phytologist 203, no. 1 (2014): 22–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.12790.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Cacho, N. Ivalú, Patrick J. McIntyre, Daniel J. Kliebenstein, and Sharon Y. Strauss. "Genome size evolution is associated with climate seasonality and glucosinolates, but not life history, soil nutrients or range size, across a clade of mustards." Annals of Botany 127, no. 7 (2021): 887–902. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcab028.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Background and Aims We investigate patterns of evolution of genome size across a morphologically and ecologically diverse clade of Brassicaceae, in relation to ecological and life history traits. While numerous hypotheses have been put forward regarding autecological and environmental factors that could favour small vs. large genomes, a challenge in understanding genome size evolution in plants is that many hypothesized selective agents are intercorrelated. Methods We contribute genome size estimates for 47 species of Streptanthus Nutt. and close relatives, and take advantage of many

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Havey, M. J., J. McCreight, W. Rhodes, and G. Taurick. "Inheritance and Evolution of the Cucurbit Organellar Genomes." HortScience 31, no. 4 (1996): 601e—601. http://dx.doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.31.4.601e.

Full text

Abstract:

The cucurbits have several-fold size differences in their mitochondrial genomes. Watermelon possesses a relatively small mitochondrial genome of 330 kb. Squash has a larger mitochondrial genome of 840 kb. Cucumber and melon possess huge mitochondrial genomes of 1500 and 2400 kb, respectively. We demonstrated predominately paternal transmission of the mitochondrial genome in cucumber. Squash shows maternal transmission of the chloroplast genome. We generated reciprocal crosses and identified restriction fragment length polymorphisms in the chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes of melon, squash,

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Bento, Miguel, J. Perry Gustafson, Wanda Viegas, and Manuela Silva. "Size matters in Triticeae polyploids: larger genomes have higher remodeling." Genome 54, no. 3 (2011): 175–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/g10-107.

Full text

Abstract:

Polyploidization is one of the major driving forces in plant evolution and is extremely relevant to speciation and diversity creation. Polyploidization leads to a myriad of genetic and epigenetic alterations that ultimately generate plants and species with increased genome plasticity. Polyploids are the result of the fusion of two or more genomes into the same nucleus and can be classified as allopolyploids (different genomes) or autopolyploids (same genome). Triticeae synthetic allopolyploid species are excellent models to study polyploids evolution, particularly the wheat–rye hybrid tritical

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Tang, Yun, Chun Lan Mai, Jian Ping Yu, and Da Yong Li. "Investigating the role of life-history traits in mammalian genomes." Animal Biology 70, no. 2 (2020): 121–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15707563-20191152.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Genome size evolution has intrigued many evolutionary biologists. Ultimately, the reasons that genomes have become large are proliferation of non-coding elements and/or duplication events. The proximate causes are related to phylogeny, life-history traits and environmental factors. Genome size in mammals exhibits little interspecific variation compared with other taxa. The proximate causes and the evolutionary patterns shaped by phylogeny or life-history traits are largely unknown for mammals. Here, with a dataset of 121 species of mammals, we studied the variations of genome size ass

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Puttick, Mark N., James Clark, and Philip C. J. Donoghue. "Size is not everything: rates of genome size evolution, not C -value, correlate with speciation in angiosperms." Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 282, no. 1820 (2015): 20152289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.2289.

Full text

Abstract:

Angiosperms represent one of the key examples of evolutionary success, and their diversity dwarfs other land plants; this success has been linked, in part, to genome size and phenomena such as whole genome duplication events. However, while angiosperms exhibit a remarkable breadth of genome size, evidence linking overall genome size to diversity is equivocal, at best. Here, we show that the rates of speciation and genome size evolution are tightly correlated across land plants, and angiosperms show the highest rates for both, whereas very slow rates are seen in their comparatively species-poor

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Pires, Chris, Ivan Maureira, Thomas Givnish, et al. "Phylogeny, Genome Size, and Chromosome Evolution of Asparagales." Aliso 22, no. 1 (2006): 287–304. http://dx.doi.org/10.5642/aliso.20062201.24.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Brainerd, Elizabeth L., Sandra S. Slutz, Edward K. Hall, and Randall W. Phillis. "PATTERNS OF GENOME SIZE EVOLUTION IN TETRAODONTIFORM FISHES." Evolution 55, no. 11 (2001): 2363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1554/0014-3820(2001)055[2363:pogsei]2.0.co;2.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Ranney, Thomas G., Connor F. Ryan, Lauren E. Deans, and Nathan P. Lynch. "Cytogenetics and Genome Size Evolution in Illicium L." HortScience 53, no. 5 (2018): 620–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.21273/hortsci12922-18.

Full text

Abstract:

Illicium is an ancient genus and member of the earliest diverging angiosperms known as the Amborellales, Nymphaeales, and Austrobaileyales (ANA) grade. These adaptable, broadleaf evergreen shrubs, including ≈40 species distributed throughout Asia and North America, are valued for diverse culinary, medicinal, and ornamental applications. The study of cytogenetics of Illicium can clarify various discrepancies and further elucidate chromosome numbers, ploidy, and chromosome and genome size evolution in this basal angiosperm lineage and provide basic information to guide plant breeding and improve

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Brainerd, Elizabeth L., Sandra S. Slutz, Edward K. Hall, and Randall W. Phillis. "PATTERNS OF GENOME SIZE EVOLUTION IN TETRAODONTIFORM FISHES." Evolution 55, no. 11 (2001): 2363–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00750.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Ågren, J. Arvid, and Stephen I. Wright. "Selfish genetic elements and plant genome size evolution." Trends in Plant Science 20, no. 4 (2015): 195–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2015.03.007.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Hjelmen, Carl E., Margaret A. Garrett, V. Renee Holmes, Melissa Mynes, Elizabeth Piron, and J. Spencer Johnston. "Genome Size Evolution within and between the Sexes." Journal of Heredity 110, no. 2 (2018): 219–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esy063.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Walsh, James Bruce. "The Evolution of Genome Size. T. Cavalier-Smith." Quarterly Review of Biology 61, no. 4 (1986): 539–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/415173.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Tiersch, T. R., and S. S. Wachtel. "On the Evolution of Genome Size of Birds." Journal of Heredity 82, no. 5 (1991): 363–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111105.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Bainard, J. D., and T. R. Gregory. "Genome size evolution: patterns, mechanisms, and methodological advances." Genome 56, no. 8 (2013): vii—viii. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/gen-2013-0170.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

GARDINER, ANASTASIA, DANIEL BARKER, ROGER K. BUTLIN, WILLIAM C. JORDAN, and MICHAEL G. RITCHIE. "Drosophilachemoreceptor gene evolution: selection, specialization and genome size." Molecular Ecology 17, no. 7 (2008): 1648–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2008.03713.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Beaulieu, Jeremy M., Angela T. Moles, Ilia J. Leitch, Michael D. Bennett, John B. Dickie, and Charles A. Knight. "Correlated evolution of genome size and seed mass." New Phytologist 173, no. 2 (2006): 422–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01919.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Hickey, A. J. R., and K. D. Clements. "Genome Size Evolution in New Zealand Triplefin Fishes." Journal of Heredity 96, no. 4 (2005): 356–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esi061.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!