Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Genuine Progress Indicator

Contents

Journal articles
Dissertations / Theses
Books
Book chapters
Conference papers

Academic literature on the topic 'Genuine Progress Indicator'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 1 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Genuine Progress Indicator.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Genuine Progress Indicator"

1

Harris, Michael. "Towards genuine progress on the Genuine Progress Indicator." International Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment 4, no. 1 (2008): 82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/ijewe.2008.022259.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

NERI, FRANK, and PAUL BRADSTREET. "COMMENT ON“MEASURING VICTORIA'S GENUINE PROGRESS: A GENUINE PROGRESS INDICATOR (GPI) FOR VICTORIA”." Economic Papers: A journal of applied economics and policy 25, no. 3 (2006): 295–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-3441.2006.tb00402.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Kenny, Daniel C., Robert Costanza, Tom Dowsley, et al. "Australia's Genuine Progress Indicator Revisited (1962–2013)." Ecological Economics 158 (April 2019): 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.11.025.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Brown, Clair, and Eli Lazarus. "Genuine Progress Indicator for California: 2010–2014." Ecological Indicators 93 (October 2018): 1143–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.072.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Danilishin, B. M., and O. A. Veklich. "Genuine progress indicator as an adequate macroeconomic indicator of public welfare." Studies on Russian Economic Development 21, no. 6 (2010): 644–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/s1075700710060080.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

CLARKE, MATTHEW, and PHILIP LAWN. "A RESPONSE TO “COMMENT ON MEASURING VICTORIA'S GENUINE PROGRESS: A GENUINE PROGRESS INDICATOR (GPI) FOR VICTORIA”." Economic Papers: A journal of applied economics and policy 25, no. 3 (2006): 298–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-3441.2006.tb00403.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Sulik, Joanna, and Joanna Sulik. "Application dilemmas of the Genuine Progress Indicator for Poland." Wiadomości Statystyczne. The Polish Statistician 63, no. 6 (2018): 5–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.0656.

Full text

Abstract:

The aim of the article is to present the Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) as tool for measuring welfare concerning of the principles of sustainable development. GPI belongs to the group of synthetic indicators expressed in monetary units. The application of monetary measure allows to link national accounts with GPI. The article describes the indicator’s concept and its structure according to the framework developed in the years 2013—2016 GPI 2.0. It was presented how its components are computed in American research. This description of GPI was supplemented by remarks on potential feasibility of computing and using GPI 2.0 under Polish conditions.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Yoshida, Masami, Jintavee Khlaisang, and Chun Xiong. "Use of the Genuine Progress Indicator in global education." Globalisation, Societies and Education 18, no. 2 (2019): 97–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2019.1689487.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Hamilton, Clive. "The genuine progress indicator methodological developments and results from Australia." Ecological Economics 30, no. 1 (1999): 13–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0921-8009(98)00099-8.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Clarke, Matthew. "Is the Genuine Progress Indicator really genuine? Considering well-being impacts of exports and imports." International Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment 3, no. 2 (2007): 91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/ijewe.2007.017877.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Genuine Progress Indicator"

1

Posner, Stephen. "Estimating the Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) for Baltimore, MD." ScholarWorks @ UVM, 2010. http://scholarworks.uvm.edu/graddis/183.

Full text

Abstract:

In order to better manage progress toward improved human welfare, governments and organizations around the world have begun to report on more comprehensive indicators of environmental, social, and economic conditions. The Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) has proven useful as a measure of economic welfare by incorporating changes in environmental conditions, resource stocks, social capital, income distribution, and other non-marketed economic activity. Studies at the local scale have also found the GPI to be an effective tool for informing debate and stimulating questions about the nature of the economic development process. In this study, the GPI methodology is applied to Baltimore City, Baltimore County, and Maryland in order to explore how sustainable economic welfare in the Baltimore region has changed from 1950-2005. A comparison among per capita GPI trends in four US cities shows Baltimore to have the highest average annual growth rate over the study period. Comparisons are made between per capita GPI and Gross Domestic Product (GDP), the most widely recognized measure of national economic performance. Analysis of the trends at all three scales show that GDP growth does not correlate well with changes in welfare as measure by GPI. This implies that Baltimore City, Baltimore County, and Maryland could be in a period of uneconomic growth, when the social and environmental costs of further economic growth outweigh the benefits of such growth. However, the underlying methods used in sub-national applications of the GPI inevitably lead toward certain results, giving rise to an indicator framework that favors particular policy and development outcomes. This situation is defined as indicator bias. Since indicator bias can inadvertently lead society toward undesirable conditions, key assumptions that contribute to indicator bias in the GPI are tested for how they influence the final GPI results. The costs of crime, long-term environmental damage, and depletion of non-renewable natural resources categories are explored in more depth. GPI is found to be an imperfect measure of true progress, but it is believed to be an improvement over GDP for guiding modern society towards a more sustainable and desirable future. More work is needed to incorporate uncertainty, fine-tune the underlying GPI methodology, and build broad consensus about how to measure economic performance and social progress. By providing information about social, ecological, and economic conditions of the region, though, the Baltimore GPI does inform citizens and decision-makers about a wide range of impacts resulting from the modern ‘GDP growth’ paradigm

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Fox, Mairi-Jane Venesky. "Designing for Economic Success: A 50-State Analysis of the Genuine Progress Indicator." ScholarWorks @ UVM, 2017. http://scholarworks.uvm.edu/graddis/679.

Full text

Abstract:

The use of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) as the primary measure of economic progress has arguably led to unintended consequences of environmental degradation and socially skewed outcomes. The Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) was designed to reveal the trade offs associated with conventional economic growth and to assess the broader impact of economic benefits and costs on sustainable human welfare. Although originally designed for use at the national scale, an interest has developed in the United States in a state-level uptake of the GPI to inform and guide policy. However, questions exist about the quality and legitimacy of the GPI as a composite indicator. These questions include concerns about the underlying assumptions, the monetary weights and variables used, statistical rigor, magnitude of data collection required, and lack of a transparent governance mechanism for the metric. This study aims to address these issues and explore the GPI through a design-thinking lens as both a design artifact and intervention. The leading paper in this dissertation offers the first GPI accounting for all 50 U.S. states. State GPI results are introduced and compared to Gross State Product (GSP). Then an analysis of the components to GPI reveals which drive the differences in outcomes, including examining the sustainability aspects of the state-level results. The second paper investigates the quality of the GPI as a composite indicator by testing its sensitivity to numerical assumptions and relative magnitudes of components, with particular attention to the possible unintended policy consequences of the design. The third paper seeks to answer the question of both efficiency (data parsimony) and effectiveness (comparatively to other indicators) by analysis of correlations between GPI components and with other state-level indicators such as the Gallup Well-Being Indicator, Ecological Footprint, and UN Human Development Index. To garner insight about possible GPI improvements, goals, and governance gaps in the informal U.S GPI network, the final paper dives into processes, outputs, and outcomes from the community of practice as revealed through a facilitated U.S. GPI workshop.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Krajhanzl, Martin. "Alternativní ukazatele vývoje hospodářství." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2008. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-4169.

Full text

Abstract:

Diplomová práce se zabývá tématem alternativních ukazatelů vývoje hospodářství, které berou v úvahu úroveň štěstí ve společnosti. Zkoumá, za jakých historických souvislostí v první polovině 20. století vznikal ukazatel HDP a na co tehdy reagoval a snaží se nastínit, co se od té doby změnilo. Cílem je odpovědět na otázky, zda má smysl měřit indexy na základě štěstí a zda již dozrála doba na rozšíření povědomí o nich.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Genuine Progress Indicator"

1

Cobb, Clifford. The genuine progress indicator: Summary of data and methodology. Redefining Progress, 1995.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

A, Lawn Philip, and Clarke Matthew Dr, eds. Sustainable welfare in the Asia-Pacific: Studies using the genuine progress indicator. Edward Elgar, 2008.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Colman, Ronald. Measuring genuine progress: The Nova Scotia experience and its potential relevance to Bhutan's efforts to operationalise the view of gross national happiness. Centre for Bhutan Studies, 2005.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Matthew, Clarke, and Philip Lawn. Measuring Genuine Progress: An Application of the Genuine Progress Indicator. Nova Science Publishers, 2006.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Genuine Progress Indicator"

1

Berik, Günseli, and Erica Gaddis. "Utah Genuine Progress Indicator." In Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer Netherlands, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_3466.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Anielski, Mark. "Alberta’s Genuine Progress Indicator." In Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer Netherlands, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_69.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Pyzheva, Yulia I. "Assessing the Social Component of the Genuine Progress Indicator for Russia". У Proceeding of the International Science and Technology Conference "FarEastСon 2020". Springer Singapore, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0953-4_114.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

"Genuine Progress Indicator." In The Anti-Capitalist Dictionary. Zed Books Ltd, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781350222939.0071.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

"The Genuine Progress Indicator of Singapore: results." In Measuring Welfare beyond Economics. Routledge, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203067833-12.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

"The Genuine Progress Indicator as an alternative indicator of welfare." In Measuring Welfare beyond Economics. Routledge, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203067833-9.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

"Items used to calculate the Genuine Progress Indicator." In Measuring Welfare beyond Economics. Routledge, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203067833-10.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

"The Genuine Progress Indicator of Hong Kong: results." In Measuring Welfare beyond Economics. Routledge, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203067833-11.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Kubiszewski, Ida. "The Genuine Progress Indicator: A Measure of Net Economic Welfare." In Encyclopedia of Ecology. Elsevier, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-409548-9.10609-8.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Tolksdorf, Alexander M., Terry L. Howard, and Gregory W. Ulferts. "Strategic Perspectives on the Genuine Progress Indicator and Gross Domestic Product." In Wealth Creation and Poverty Reduction. IGI Global, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1207-4.ch022.

Full text

Abstract:

Traditionally, the status of an economy has been measured regarding its real output. The most popular yardstick for this figure is the gross domestic product. Gross Domestic Product, however, does not take into account many more complex elements of economic welfare. Efficient and accurate measurement of the status of an economy is central to furthering economic sustainability. This paper seeks to investigate the advantages and disadvantages of one such well-being measure, the Genuine Progress Indicator, compared to the use of traditional Gross Domestic Product as a measure of economic activity.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Genuine Progress Indicator"

1

Whitton, John. "Stakeholder Participation for the Legacy Ponds and Legacy Silos (LP&LS) Facility at Sellafield, Cumbria, UK: The Nature and Effectiveness of the Dialogue." In ASME 2009 12th International Conference on Environmental Remediation and Radioactive Waste Management. ASMEDC, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/icem2009-16030.

Full text

Abstract:

The Legacy Ponds and Silos (LP&S) facilities are part of the UK nuclear legacy located at the Sellafield Site, Cumbria. There are four individual facilities containing nuclear wastes that have accumulated over a period of approximately 50 years. Waste retrieval and conditioning, in preparation for decommissioning, is currently being carried out by the site operator. LP&S have recently proposed a re-engagement with stakeholders following the initial engagement in December 2005. This paper reviews this earlier engagement in terms of the nature of dialogue that was carried out when compared against definitions of deliberation provided in the literature. The aim of this paper is to provide those planning future engagement with a better understanding of how the nature of dialogue can vary and uses participation and deliberation as indicators of effective engagement. A concern of those working towards a programme of effective stakeholder participation in 2005 was how to ensure genuine dialogue and stakeholder representation in such a strictly controlled and regulated environment with a technical complexity that challenges technical specialist and layperson alike. LP&S recognised that effective dialogue with stakeholders on the available technical options and their associated societal impacts would form a significant part of this process if options were to prove resilient. However, the challenge presented to LP&S was how to engage stakeholders on a variety of projects, whilst ensuring the output could be used by the projects as part of their technical decision making. Initial contact was made with stakeholders in December 2005, as part of a ‘Baseline’ Best Practicable Environmental Option (BPEO) study. A BPEO study leads to decisions on waste management based on an integrated assessment of alternative options, on the basis of factors such as the occupational and environmental risks, the environmental impacts, costs and social implications of the options. An engagement framework was also developed by LP&S to understand the engagement within the context of that taking place nationally and internationally. LP&S plan to reconvene stakeholders as part of the commitment made to them in 2006 to review progress on decommissioning projects. Currently, the strategy by which this will be achieved is unclear, however it is proposed that rather than full engagement, LP&S will provide a series of information updates to the West Cumbria Site Stakeholder Group (WCSSG). Representing local interests only and potentially reducing the opportunity for deliberation, further research is recommended to assess the nature of dialogue and the role of deliberation in this type of forum.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!