Academic literature on the topic 'George Edward III'

Abstract The original fortifications at Windsor date from the time of William the Conqueror, and he is appropriately the earliest English monarch mentioned in Pope’s poem. As well as providing a defensive stronghold on the western side of London, the site had the advantage of lying close to a royal hunting forest which the Saxon monarchs had created. The castle itself underwent periodic refurbishment in the middle ages, but it was not until the reign of Edward III that massive construction took place to alter the character of the fortress. A century later, under Edward IV, the royal chapel of St George was erected in the Lower Ward.

Abstract England in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries was in many ways a cosmopolitan country. Under Henry III many of the leading Wgures in the realm were not English in origin; not only were there the court favourites from Savoy and Poitou, but the king’s main opponent, Simon de Montfort, was a Frenchman. There were many prominent foreigners in the English Church, including Boniface of Savoy, archbishop of Canterbury, Peter des Roches, bishop of Winchester, and Peter of Aigueblanche, bishop of Hereford. Westminster abbey owed its inspiration in architectural terms to France. Edward I relied greatly upon the Savoyard Otto de Grandson; GeoVrey de Geneville was another important supporter of the king. Edward’s great castles in Wales owed much to the influence of the Savoyards, and above all Master James of St George.

Part III marks a shift in the exchange between the two families as Lady Beaumont begins to write independently to Wordsworth on a regular basis. A major focus of her letters to Wordsworth of 1814 and 1815 is the sale and reception of The Excursion. Another major concern around this time is the production of the frontispiece engravings (from paintings by Sir George) to Wordsworth’s Poems and The White Doe of Rylstone (1815). This section also contains details of paintings by Washington Allston, as well as insights into Edward Nash and William Westall, and Beaumont’s assessment of Haydon’s Christ’s Entry into Jerusalem. Beaumont gives detailed appraisals of the actors Edmund Kean, Eliza O’Neill, and John Philip Kemble. In addition, letters in Part III contain two eye-witness descriptions of the battlefield of Waterloo.

Abstract queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, and empress of India, was born on 24 May 1819 at Kensington Palace, London. She was the only legitimate child of the fourth son of King George III, Edward Augustus, duke of Kent (1767–1820), who in 1818 had abandoned Julie de St Laurent, his mistress of many years, in order to join his brothers in the attempt to provide an heir to the throne. His wife was a young widow: born Princess Victoire of Saxe-Coburg-Saalfeld (1786–1861), she had married the prince of Leiningen, with whom she had two children, Prince Charles and Princess Feodore, before his death in 1814.

One of the most important information sources about Ottoman cuisine is travel books. In this study, the goal is to obtain information about Otooman cuisine from the perspectives of foreign travelers. For this purpose, some travel books have been examined and systematic literature review and document review techniques, which are qualitative research methods, were used. During the study, the following works have been examined and the information in these works have been compared to each other: "Turkey in 1855" by Jean Henri Abdolonyme Ubucini, “Tournefort's Travelbook” by Joseph de Tournefort, “Memories from Ottoman Country” by Petır Mateev, “Tavernier' Travelbook” and “Travel to Iran Through Turkey in the Mid-Century of XVII.” by Jean-Baptiste Tavernier, “İbn Battuta's Travelbook” by İbn Battuta, “Diary in Turkish and Greek Waters” by George William Frederick Howard, “Travel to İstanbul and Çanakkale in 1814” by Edward Raczynski, “The Travels of Bertrandon de la Broquière” by Bertrandon de la Broquière, “Travel to City of Sultans” by Salomon Schweigger, “Turkish Diary” by Stephan Gerlach, “Fresne-Canaye's Travelbook” by Philippe du Fresne-Canaye, “Pierre Belon's Travelbook” by Pierre Belon. Even though the information from these travelers are similar in most cases, some differences also have been observed.

Abstract The manifold problems involved in interpreting the precise status and value of any of the three principal redactions of Book I constitute one of the thorniest issues in Froissart studies. The best initial approach to these matters is to be found in John Palmer’s opening chapter for the symposium edited by him and published in 1981. It informs the presentation offered here, which seeks to provide a necessarily concise introduction to the manuscript tradition of Book I in advance of a close reading of several key episodes in Froissart’s Rome Manuscript account of the reign of Edward III. It should be stated from the outset that, although I have myself written elsewhere1 about this manuscript tradition, the hypotheses presented by Palmer appear to me to represent the most judicious approach so far to the issues raised; they are, moreover, given cautious endorsement in the 1981 symposium by Richard Barber and P. E. Russell, as well as by George Diller—whose careful study of Book I will also be referred to below, in conjunction with references to his edition of the Rome manuscript. Readers wishing to enjoy the labyrinthine delights afforded by the various manuscripts of Book I are invited to consult these works and their scholarly apparatus (which must of course include Shears’s monograph of 1930, and the introductions to the editions prepared by Siméon Luce and Kervyn de Lettenhove for, respectively, the Société de l’Histoire de France, and the Academie royale de Belgique).

Abstract The personality and policies of Richard II, and the long-term significance of his reign, were matters of debate and controversy among suspicious and worried contemporaries, and they have remained matters of debate and controversy ever since. Judgements by those who had known him personally, or who had lived under his rule, that he was a tyrant or a foolish king, have echoed long. The theme that he was, with Edward II and Henry VI, one of a trinity of notably crass and unsuccessful rulers, has had a long currency. His rule, arguably, exemplified m governance, whose features were the stuff of bad dreams for the subjects of the later medieval English monarchy. A locus classicus for the indictment of this scarifying trinity is the manifesto against Edward IV ‘s government put out in 1469 by George duke of Clarence, George Neville, archbishop of York, and the earl of Warwick.1 Edward ‘s rule was compared in this manifesto to theirs, which had led ‘to their destruction and the great hurt and impoverishment of this land ‘. The three kings had estranged the great lords of their blood from their secret council, and relied on the advice of those who had no respect for the lords ‘ interests and those of the realm in general, but who impoverished the Crown for their own enrichment, encouraged the imposition of unjust taxes and forfeitures, and generated disorder and crime through their practice of maintenance.

The American Helicopter Museum and Education Center opened to the public at the Brandywine Airport on October 18, 1996. This milestone was the realization of a vision adopted at a luncheon meeting hosted by the Philadelphia Chapter of the American Helicopter Society on July 30, 1993. Chapter leaders had previously brainstormed potential ideas for commemorating the upcoming 50th Anniversary of the American Helicopter Society in 1994, but recognized the need to engage a broader constituency to do something significant. With the goal of establishing a 50th Anniversary Committee, a luncheon was scheduled at Boeing Helicopters in Ridley Park, PA. Participants included the author, several Chapter officers and an invitation list that included Philadelphia area rotary-wing business leaders, industry pioneers and influencers. Attendees at that first meeting included Lee Douglas, Frank Duke, Vincent Genovese, Euan Hooper, Warren Jacobs, Wes Moore, Ren Pierpoint, John Schneider, George Townson, Edward B. Wilford III and Peter Wright, Sr. After debating multiple options for the commemoration, the idea of a museum was embraced when Peter Wright, then President of Keystone Helicopters, offered to donate several vintage helicopters if a museum was established. Two weeks later, the nascent 50th Anniversary Committee met again with a mission to: “Lay the foundation for a permanent rotary-wing restoration, conservation and exhibition facility in the Delaware Valley.” Referencing the documented minutes of the aforementioned meeting and that of subsequent meetings of the 50th Anniversary Committee, other documents and the recollections of the author, this paper will trace the formative years of the museum from July 1993 to October 1996. It will address the many challenges of founding an aviation museum including incorporation, location identification, building the collection and creating the exhibits and programs. It will recall the people involved and their significant contributions. This paper is particularly compelling to publish this year, recognizing the 25th anniversary of the American Helicopter Museum and Education Center on 18 October 2021.

ABSTRACT Background: In school environments, the No Smoking Area Policy is based on protecting young people who are currently studying at school from exposure to harmful cigarette smoke. It is expected to indirectly reduce student smoking rates. This study aimed to describe the implementation of the No Smoking Area policy at High School 2 Nganjuk, East Java and to identify the factors influencing the policy implementation. Subjects and Methods: This was a qualitative study carried out at High School 2 Nganjuk, East Java. The study subjects were included the principal, student deputy principals, counseling guidance teachers, homeroom teachers, employees, and students of High School 2 Nganjuk. Data were collected using observation, interviews, and documentation. The source triangulation technique used the technique of checking the validity of the data. This study used an interactive model of data analysis technique, which is based on the theory of George C. Edward III, consisted of communication, resources, dispositions, and bureaucratic structures. Results: In High School 2 Nganjuk, the No Smoking Area Policy has not been implemented optimally, particularly on the resource factor. For example, some teachers and staff still smoking in schools. This was not in accordance with the provisions in the No Smoking Area Policy. As the budget for funds from School Operational Assistance (BOS) was integrated with the School Environment Introduction Period (MPLS/MOS as well as the Adiwiyata program, there was no special budget for the implementation of the No Smoking Area policy. There was still not enough amount of billboards about no smoking area. The communication factor was the supporting factor. The policy for the No Smoking Area is always communicated to school residents. The disposition factors was the policy implementers’ engagement. The bureaucratic factor were structure and the presence of SOP in policy implementation. Conclusion: The enforcement of the policy of the No Smoking Area in High School 2 Nganjuk has not been maximized, so all factors, both contact factors, resource factors, disposal factors, and bureaucratic factors, need to be assisted. Keywords: smoking area, high school, policy Correspondence: Yeny Kusumawati. School of Health Sciences, Satria Bhakti Nganjuk, East Java, Indonesia. Email: yenykusumawati.sbn.ngk@gmail.com. Mobile: 082244297997 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26911/the7thicph.04.01