Academic literature on the topic 'Germania, Marianne'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Germania, Marianne.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Germania, Marianne"
Hagemann, K. "Marianne or Germania: Nationalizing Women in Alsace, 1870-1946." French History 27, no. 2 (February 14, 2013): 298–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fh/crs155.
Full textHarp, Stephen L. "Marianne or Germania? Nationalizing Women in Alsace, 1870–1946." Modern & Contemporary France 19, no. 3 (August 2011): 380–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09639489.2011.593953.
Full textConnolly, J. E. "Marianne or Germania? Nationalizing Women in Alsace, 1870-1946." French Studies 66, no. 1 (December 26, 2011): 128–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fs/knr220.
Full textEttwiller, Eric. "Vlossak (Elizabeth), Marianne or Germania? Nationalizing Women in Alsace, 1870-1946." Revue d’Alsace, no. 138 (September 1, 2012): 393–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/alsace.1697.
Full textQuataert, Jean H. "Elizabeth Vlossak. Marianne or Germania? Nationalizing Women in Alsace, 1870–1946." American Historical Review 117, no. 4 (September 21, 2012): 1286–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ahr/117.4.1286.
Full textHarvey, David Allen. "A Review of “Marianne or Germania? Nationalizing Women in Alsace, 1870–1946”." History: Reviews of New Books 40, no. 1 (January 2012): 21–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03612759.2012.624800.
Full textCarrol, A. "Marianne or Germania? Nationalizing Women in Alsace, 1870-1946, by Elizabeth Vlossak." English Historical Review 127, no. 527 (August 1, 2012): 1015–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehr/ces144.
Full textRhoades, Michelle. "Marianne or Germania? Nationalizing Women in Alsace, 1870-1946, by Elizabeth Vlossak.Marianne or Germania? Nationalizing Women in Alsace, 1870-1946, by Elizabeth Vlossak. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2011. xii., 330 pp. $115.00 US (cloth)." Canadian Journal of History 47, no. 1 (April 2012): 146–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cjh.47.1.146.
Full textGoodfellow, Samuel Huston. "Marianne or Germania? Nationalizing Women in Alsace, 1870–1945. By Elizabeth Vlossak. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2010. Pp. xiv + 330. Cloth $115.00. ISBN 978-0-19-956111-7." Central European History 45, no. 1 (March 2012): 143–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0008938911001087.
Full textLefebvre, Jean-Pierre. "La fratrie introuvable :(les fils rouges de Marianne)." Germanica, no. 6 (December 31, 1989): 13–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/germanica.2523.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Germania, Marianne"
Bruchhausen, Esther-Beatrice Christiane von. "Das Zeichen im Kostümball Marianne und Germania in der politischen Ikonographie /." [S.l. : s.n.], 1999. http://deposit.ddb.de/cgi-bin/dokserv?idn=962387878.
Full textWilgaux, Jérôme. ""Le mariage dans un degré rapproché" : anthropologie historique du mariage athénien des demi-germains à l'époque classique." Bordeaux 3, 2000. http://www.theses.fr/2000BOR30051.
Full textRoth, Gregory E. "Paradox beyond nature: the Marian homilies of Germanos I, patriarch of Constantinople (715-730)." IMRI - Marian Library / OhioLINK, 2011. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=udmarian1430754356.
Full textRoy, Francine 1948. ""...Templum nova forma constructum..." : early 17th-century late Gothic churches in Wolfenbüttel and Bückeburg." Thesis, McGill University, 2000. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=31137.
Full textLuo, Gang. "La protection de l'autonomie personnelle en matière matrimoniale dans le cadre des traditions juridiques européenne et chinoise : études comparatives sur la transformation historique vers un nouveau "ius commune" de la liberté matrimoniale à la lumière des droits français, allemand, anglais et du droit chinois." Thesis, Paris 1, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017PA01D005.
Full textIn the current situation where the matrimonial institution has become the expression of an individual freedom, rising to the level of constitutional law and international law, questions may arise as to, first, whether a new ius commune in this respect has been born on the basis of Chinese and European legal traditions, and then, to what extent. The answers closely depend on a glance at the past of this institution in the light of comparative law. Based on Romano-Canon law, the ius commune europaeum had left a considerable freedom as Roman consensus to the conclusion of marriage, but excluded the divorce, which had been followed by French, German and English laws until the 16th century. It is the Protestant Reformation of the 16th century and national codifications of the 18th and 19th century that maked this old ius commune burst. Nevertheless, the notion of individual freedom and the claim of legal equality provided the basis for a new ius commune of matrimonial freedom that evokes not only the freedom to marry but also the freedom to divorce. It is since the 20th century that the European notion of matrimonial freedom, at least as a “state of spirit”, penetrated into the Chinese legal order, leading to China’s break with its traditional heritage that had made the individual freedom of the spouses disadvantaged and unequal, and to the birth of a new ius commune crossing the two traditions. However, such a convergence, due to the cultural constraint being the fruit of distinct historical evolutions, is still only a conceptual and ideological rapprochement
In der gegenwärtigen Situation, wo die Institution der Ehe zum Ausdruck der individuellen Freiheit geworden ist, die sich auf dem Niveau des Verfassungs- und Völkerrechts erhoben hat, ist zunächst zu hinterfragen, ob ein neues gemeines Recht in dieser Hinsicht entstanden ist, das sich aus der europäischen und chinesischen Rechtstraditionen ergibt, und dann inwieweit. Die Antworten auf diese Fragen hängen in hohem Maße von einem Blick zurück in die Vergangenheit dieser Institution im Lichte der Rechtsvergleichung. Das römisch-kanonische Ius commune, das bis zum 16. Jahrhundert von der französischen, deutschen, englischen Rechte gefolgt worden war, hatte der Eheschließung eine grosse Freiheit wie römische Konsensvereinbarung gelassen, aber die Ehescheidung ausgeschlossen. Die protestantische Reformation im 16. Jahrhundert und die Nationalkodifikationen im 18. und 19. Jahrhundert zersplitterten dieses alte gemeine Recht. Allerdings schufen der Gedanke der individuellen Freiheit und die Einforderung der Rechtsgleichheit wichtige Grundlagen für einen neuen gemeinen Recht von Ehefreiheit, das sich nicht nur auf die Eheschließungsfreiheit sondern auch auf die Ehescheidungsfreiheit beruft. Seit 20. Jahrhundert ist der europäische Begriff von Ehefreiheit zumindest als eine „Geisteshaltung“ in die chinesische Rechtsordnung eingeführt worden. Dies hat dazu geführt, dass China mit dem traditionellen Erbe gebrochen hat, das die individuelle Freiheit der Ehegatten benachteiligt hatte, und dass ein neues gemeines Recht quer durch diese zwei Rechtstraditionen entstanden ist. Aufgrund der kulturellen Einschränkung, die auf unterschiedliche historische Entwicklungen zurückzuführen sind, ist dennoch eine solche Angleichung noch immer eine konzeptionelle und ideologische Annäherung
当前,婚姻制度已经演进成为个人自由的表达,并且上升到了宪法与国际法的层面,于是人们不禁要问,在这一方面基于中欧两大法律传统的新的“共同法”是否已经形成?如果有,在多大的范围内呢?这些答案紧紧地取决于从比较法的角度对这个制度既往史的考察。根植于中世纪罗马教会法的“欧洲共同法”对婚姻的缔结赋予了极大的自由,如罗马式意思一致,但却排除了离婚自由,并在十六世纪以前被法国法、德国法以及英格兰法所共同遵循。正是欧洲十六世纪的宗教改革以及十八和十九世纪的民族国家法典化运动打碎了旧的“共同法”秩序。尽管如此,个人自由的观念和法律平等的诉求为婚姻自由新一轮的“共同法”奠定了基础,不仅涉及结婚自由,还扩大到离婚自由。正是二十世纪以来,婚姻自由的欧洲观念,起码作为一种“精神状态”,被引入中国法律秩序,使中国与其传统遗产(夫妻个人自由的不尊重和不平等)相决裂,横跨两大法律传统的新一轮“共同法” 也相应诞生。然而,由于不同历史演进所带来的文化束缚,这样的一种趋同,目前还只是处于一种概念上和观念形态上的接近。
Débourdeaux, Salles Frédérique. "La femme et le droit du Ve au VIIe siècle : le Code théodosien et ses suites." Thesis, Aix-Marseille, 2014. http://www.theses.fr/2014AIXM1083.
Full textAt the beginning of the Roman Empire era Women enjoyed a certain degree of autonomy. We wondered how it evolved when Roman civilisation had to face the durable installation of Germanic populations on its lands. We undertook to study the turning-point during the 5th to the 7th century. How did legal provisions regarding women, which were derived from the Codex Theodosianus, evolve when Barbarian kings decided in turn to enact written laws? To evaluate the impact of legislative measures on society, we have drawn upon the comments of contemporary authors and compared the text of legal dispositions with practitioners' forms. In order to measure Christian influence on imperial constitutions and on Germanic texts, we read the Fathers of the Church and conciliar decisions. We tried to grasp the reasons for the adoption of particular measures. We have attempted to examine whether it is possible to refer to "women's rights", from the Roman Empire to the Burgundian, Frankish, Visigoth and Ostrogoth kingdoms. Roman law appears to be the common thread which links the Empire to the Barbarian kingdoms, without breaking. It shaped the way women were considered in societies which had become Romano-Germanic. Law and societies' permeation by Roman mores contributed to the merging of peoples. Some Germanic customs obviously survived. Legislation sometimes drew on the fertile ground of Christian thought. We have attempted, in our research, to map these currents
Bruchhausen, Esther-Beatrice Christiane von [Verfasser]. "Das Zeichen im Kostümball : Marianne und Germania in der politischen Ikonographie / von Esther-Beatrice Christiane von Bruchhausen." 1999. http://d-nb.info/962387878/34.
Full textBlume, Anne Lynne. "Absent mothers, absent fathers: Aspects of German Fascism as seen through the contemporary camera (Germany, Helma Sanders-Brahms, Agnieszka Holland, Marianne S. W. Rosenbaum, Su Friedrich)." Thesis, 1993. http://hdl.handle.net/1911/13693.
Full textBooks on the topic "Germania, Marianne"
Gall, Lothar. Germania, eine deutsche Marianne? =: Germania, une Marianne allemande? Bonn: Bouvier, 1993.
Find full textMarianne or Germania?: Nationalizing women in Alsace, 1870-1946. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Find full texteditor, Storz Bernd author, ed. Marianne Hagemann: Linie finden. Freiburg i. Br: Modo, 2013.
Find full textPolz, Marianne. Sprachkultur: Festschrift für Marianne Polz. Siegen: C. Böschen, 2009.
Find full textBrecht, Bertolt. Briefe an Marianne Zoff und Hanne Hiob. Edited by Zoff Marianne 1893-1984, Hiob Hanne 1926-, and Glaeser Günter. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1990.
Find full textMarianne: 6 degrees of connection, a love story. Craftsbury Common, Vermont: ViewpoinT Books, 2012.
Find full textKirstein, Britt-Angela. Marianne Ehrmann: Publizistin und Herausgeberin im ausgehenden 18. Jahrhundert. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, 1997.
Find full textill, Shoemaker Kathryn E., ed. Good-bye Marianne: The graphic novel. Plattsburgh, N.Y: Tundra Books of Northern New York, 2008.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Germania, Marianne"
Vlossak, Elizabeth. "Introduction." In Marianne or Germania?, 1–45. Oxford University Press, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199561117.003.0001.
Full textVlossak, Elizabeth. "Schooling the Step-Daughters of Germania: Education and the Press, 1871–1914." In Marianne or Germania?, 46–90. Oxford University Press, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199561117.003.0002.
Full textVlossak, Elizabeth. "An Alsatian Women's Movement? Nation, Region, Confession, and the Limits of German Feminism, 1874–1914." In Marianne or Germania?, 91–133. Oxford University Press, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199561117.003.0003.
Full textVlossak, Elizabeth. "Alsatian Women and the Great War, 1914–18." In Marianne or Germania?, 135–67. Oxford University Press, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199561117.003.0004.
Full textVlossak, Elizabeth. "Rebuilding French Alsace: Language, Myth, and the Republican Ideal, 1914–24." In Marianne or Germania?, 168–208. Oxford University Press, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199561117.003.0005.
Full textVlossak, Elizabeth. "‘Malaise Alsacien’—Malaise féminin? Alsatian Women's Identity in Question, 1918–39." In Marianne or Germania?, 209–52. Oxford University Press, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199561117.003.0006.
Full textVlossak, Elizabeth. "From Nazi Re-Annexation to Full Citizenship: The Final Stage of Nationalization, 1940–6." In Marianne or Germania?, 253–91. Oxford University Press, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199561117.003.0007.
Full textVlossak, Elizabeth. "Conclusion." In Marianne or Germania?, 292–97. Oxford University Press, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199561117.003.0008.
Full textRöder-Bolton, Gerlinde. "Marian’s Weimar." In George Eliot in Germany, 1854–55, 95–104. Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315254425-7.
Full textScaff, Lawrence A. "The Land of Immigrants." In Max Weber in America. Princeton University Press, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691147796.003.0003.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Germania, Marianne"
Obizhaeva, Marina. "Points of support for Serbian grammatical scholarship at the turning point from religious education to universal education." In Tenth Rome Cyril-Methodian Readings. Indrik, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.31168/91674-576-4.21.
Full text