Dissertations / Theses on the topic 'Glass Ceiling Theory'

Research on the glass ceiling shows that women may encounter obstacles in their pursuit of high-level management positions. The purpose of this quantitative study was to test the explanatory style theoretical framework by examining relationships between women's glass ceiling beliefs, career advancement satisfaction, and quit intention and to determine whether satisfaction with career advancement opportunities mediated the relationship between glass ceilings beliefs and quit intention. Data were collected from 179 working women in the public or private sector and women who exited the public or private sector job market within the past 5 years via Web-based surveys. Glass ceiling beliefs were assessed using the Career Pathways Survey (CPS), career advancement satisfaction was assessed using the Career Satisfaction Measure, and quit intention was assessed using the Intention to Quit Scale and data were analyzed using multiple regression and correlational statistical techniques. Findings indicated significant relationships between the principal variables. Results also showed that career advancement satisfaction had a significant mediating effect on denial, resilience, and acceptance glass ceiling beliefs and quit intention. Findings may be used to help women understand how their glass ceiling beliefs and career satisfaction drivers influence their reaction to workplace events and may be used by employers to implement proactive retention strategies.

Gender discrimination is an ongoing topic, including discrimination that occurs in higher education. Previous studies have shown female faculty experience a variety of workplace discrimination including sexual harassment/bullying, salary disparities, and lack of worklife balance. This dissertation aimed to analyze equity issues for female faculty at a private university. The researcher utilized a narrative inquiry methodology, conducting interviews with five full-time female faculty. The purpose of this dissertation was to understand the participants’ everyday stories and lived experiences. The researcher utilized critical feminist theory and leadership theory to examine the notion of equity at this campus. The findings, shown through narrative profiles, demonstrate the five women have experienced equity issues at the institution including workplace bullying and lack of work-life balance. It also found the women utilize a self-silencing voice, struggling between challenging equity issues while maintaining their positions at the university. In addition, gender issues experienced prior to working at the university were discussed, demonstrating larger societal issues in relation to gender equity. This dissertation adds to the current studies on equity issues in higher education by focusing on the participants’ stories rather than quantitative or coded data. In addition, it bridged two seemingly disparate frameworks, critical feminist theory and leadership theory, to demonstrate how these concepts can work toward alleviating equity issues in organizations.

Purpose. The purpose of this study was to examine the progression and perception of the glass ceiling today, against the backdrop of decades of changing social developments, including changing demographics, economies, and technological advancements; legislative mandates; organizational structures with a more humanistic approach to human capital; a shift toward collaborative intra- and interagency organizational management; and an unprecedented active citizenry.

Theoretical Framework. The theoretical framework was based on three foundational theories: organizational theory, feminist theory, and collaborative management theory.

Methodology. This study included 12 participants, all executive-level women at the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA) from the deputy executive officer level and above. A semistructured interview approach was utilized to best capture each participant’s perceptions in relation to career advancement since each participant’s experience was different and due to the highly political climate associated with executive-level positions.

Findings. The glass ceiling is still pervasive, and all participants indicated being personally impacted by it. Comparable pay is still an issue, occupational segregation is still commonplace, children and marriage are still barriers to advancement, and despite in many cases women surpassing men in educational attainment, disparity at the top continues. Diversity has created unprecedented opportunity, even if by default. Work–life balance continues to be an issue. Technological advances and shifts to knowledge-based work are expected to increase career advancement. Feminine traits such as nurturing and consensus building that were once seen as negatives are now viewed as positive traits in collaborative structures.

Conclusions and Recommendations. The results of this study support the overall literature review and the researcher’s position that emerging changes in social and organizational structures, especially a shift to more humanistic and collaborative organizational structures, will create career advancement opportunities for women. However, since this a rapidly evolving structure, management/organizational reporting structures need to evolve as well. Women must educate themselves in nontraditional female fields like engineering and the sciences. Joining professional organizations, networking, and mentoring need to be practiced. Lastly, women must be committed to growth and know that they will have to work harder than men, have more education and credentials, and continue to push on the ceiling until it shatters.

Agentic women continue to be penalized for success in male-dominated industries, resulting in gender discrimination and differing opportunity structures (Foschi, 2000). The purpose of the proposed study is to see how an employee’s gender and status in male-dominated corporate settings influence participants’ perceptions of competency, liking, and consequences after the employee makes a mistake. These dependent variables will also be examined in relationship to participants’ level of sexism. Approximately 132 participants will be recruited from high technology companies, and will read a vignette about a male or female and entry-level or executive employee who makes a mistake. They will then answer competency, liking, and firing questions, as well as Glick & Fiske’s (1996) Ambivalent Sexism Inventory. Participants are expected to perceive females more negatively than males, and executives more negatively than entry-level employees. Additionally, female executives will be perceived as the least competent, and will be the least well liked. It is also predicted that they will be most likely fired. This study may add important information on gender stereotyping in the workplace, and further explore how an employee’s status in the company influences perceptions of the employee. The implications of the proposed study for future research are also discussed.

This quantitative study conducted by two students at Umeå University, studies if there are gender differences when it comes to salary and top positions in the accounting and auditing industry in Sweden. Previous studies have found that these differences, or gaps can relate to the glass ceiling theory. This theory is considered a phenomenon and a metephor wherein women can see through the glass to those top levels of the career ladder, but are unable to reach them as there is a ceiling, a gap, to prevent that from happening. Sweden is one of the most gender balanced countries in the world, but despite that the wage equality for similar work in Sweden is 74%. Since women with children work more often than men part-time, this leads to a less positive career, wage development and a poor pension for women. We analyzed previous studies to understand that the glass ceiling theory involved not only salary but also position inequalities based on gender. This information was used to create surveys which we sent electronically (via email) to auditors and accountants all over Sweden. This thesis is based on analysis of the survey and annual reports from 2017. Our results show that there are differences between gender when it comes to wages throughout the career ladder. Men have higher wages than women in the same positions. This applies to both office-level and up to executive positions. Differences in salaries between men and women also apply to both authorized and approved auditors when men have the higher average salary. That is also the same among those who had other leadership positions and among those who had a support function. We could not show major differences in top positions between genders. Most positions are gender balanced, which means that they are between 40-60%, except for at the CEO and partner level which is mostly men and the accounting manager position which is represented only by women. Our results show that there is gender-based inequality in salary but not in position; therefore, the glass ceiling theory is not currently in effect. This is important research as it not only expands knowledge of glass ceiling theory but also into the accounting and auditing fields. It found areas for improvement for both theoretical and practical use. We finish the thesis by referring to recommendations for future studies, such as focusing on lower levels and more accounting economics, authorised consultants, etc.

With consideration to logit regressions for the binary leader variable:Even though Cotter's 4 criteria leader and Leader model 2 did not have the highest adjusted R² with ols regression, it is important to see that in a logit regression, which is a more appropriate regression type since the leader variable is binary, that gender was not significant. Therefore, the conclusions remain the same.

Are men and women equally likely to be perceived by people to possess similar requisite characteristics in comparable yet diverse occupations within management, leadership, and entrepreneurship? Because modern workplaces continue to be impacted by the persistence of varying perceptions of men and women about requisite attributes of successful people in several organizational roles, the concept of gender bias and occupational stereotypes has warranted the attention of theoreticians, scholars, and practitioners to a large extent (Koch, D’Mello, & Sackett, 2015; Kuwabara & Thébaud, 2017; Pinker, 2003; Pinker & Spelke, 2005). Although empirical evidence clearly indicates that gender inequalities in the workplace can have a significant effect on peoples’ perceptions about different characteristics of individuals in general and in specific organizational roles, there is a paucity of research examining these perceptions in a variety of leadership positions. Previous literature has investigated the gendered construction and re-construction of these professions but only to a limited extent (Gupta, Turban, Wasti, & Sikdar, 2009; Heilman, 2001, 2012; Heilman, Wallen, Fuchs, & Tamkins, 2004; Koenig, Eagly, Mitchell, & Ristikari, 2011; Kuwabara & Thébaud, 2017; Ryan, Haslam, Hersby, & Bongiorno, 2011; Schein, 1973, 1975, 2001). However, research in years past has not yet examined the full range of industry and entrepreneurial contexts that may create gender typecasting of roles. By extension, the current study focuses on how the gender-differentiated perceptions of men and women influenced the requisite characteristics of successful professional personnel in various managerial, leadership, and entrepreneurial positions. Specifically, given that these professions are influenced by gender-role expectations and stereotypes, this empirical investigation drew from role congruity theory of prejudice (Eagly & Karau, 2002) to examine the relative degree of perceived overlap between the traits associated with specific roles in management, leadership, and entrepreneurship with the traits commonly associated with men and women in general. Primary data were obtained from a diverse sample of 600 (12 x 50) working adults in the United States (N = 600, 300 women, 300 men) between the ages of 21 and 65. This was accomplished using an online survey designed via Qualtrics and administered through Amazon’s MTurk, from the lens of the classic think manager-think male (TMTM) research paradigm (Schein, 1973, 1975, 2001). The instrument used for data collection was the 92-item Schein Descriptive Index (SDI), which was used to describe sex role stereotypes and perceived requisite characteristics of twelve distinct target groups. The results of this study indicate that the perceived requisite traits of successful leaders and entrepreneurs are construed in predominantly masculine terms. These findings support and further inform the nature, existence, significance, and persistence of the “think manager-think male stereotype effect” (TMTM effect) and the “glass ceiling phenomenon” across a variety of managerial, leadership, and entrepreneurial roles, contexts, and industries. The TMTM effect was stronger among high tech entrepreneurs, CEOs, and entrepreneurs in general, whereas it was lessened for entrepreneurs in educational and health care roles, as well as for middle managers. Additionally, consistent with prior research, TMTM effects were generally either more likely to occur, or were stronger in magnitude among male raters than among female raters. These results largely support role congruity theory of gender differences in management and leadership that indicate incongruity of female gender stereotypes in general with stereotypes about high-status and prominent occupational roles in various organizations (Eagly & Karau, 2002). Specifically, the perceived trait overlap was noted to generally be stronger between men in general and successful leaders in various roles than that between women in general and successful leaders in various similar roles. The findings of the current study are expected to be valuable for those seeking to encourage opportunity regardless of candidate gender in management, entrepreneurship, and leadership, as well as for those promoting the role of women’s advancement in these professions. The study’s results have both theoretical and practical implications. Understanding these perceptions can have a significant impact on the gender biases prevalent in society, in organizations, and even across the specific entrepreneurial contexts and industries investigated within the current study. In today’s super-competitive business environment, firms must appreciate the importance of fostering equal opportunity, avoiding gender biases, and facilitating racial and ethnic diversity.

Nas duas últimas décadas, o Brasil experimentou profundas transformações sociais. De acordo com os dados da Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios (Pnad), do Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE), as mulheres tinham 5,2 anos de estudo em 1992, e passaram a ter 7,7 anos, em 2009, registrando-se um aumento de 48,1% (Ipea, 2010). Dados do Ministério do Trabalho e Emprego, divulgados no website Folha_Uol, (2015) demonstram que aumentou a participação feminina no mercado formal de trabalho, embora as mulheres com ensino superior recebessem o equivalente a 60% do salário masculino. Dados do Ipea (Pinheiro, Fontoura, Querino, Bonetti, & Rosa, 2008) demonstram a renda familiar per capita média nas famílias chefiadas por homem branco é de R$ 997,00, ao passo que naquelas chefiadas por mulher negra é de apenas R$ 491,00, ou seja, menos da metade. Algo bem na contramão da propalada democracia racial brasileira. Apesar do aumento do número de mulheres no mercado de trabalho, de acordo com Peggy, Dwyer e Roberts (2004), a agenda de gênero da profissão contábil ajuda o imperialismo, e, com isso \"tem facilitado o projeto imperial norte-americano, uma vez que permite a manutenção de mulheres a um baixo custo\" (p.176), relacionando esse fato com a ideologia da domesticidade. Ademais, Bebbington, Thomson e Wall (1997) concluem que os estudantes de contabilidade mostram uma tendência para um modelo masculino construído ou andrógino, em vez da identidade feminina; o que encontra amparo na teoria da performatividade de Butler (2012), objeto deste estudo. Isso resulta da manutenção de estereótipos, como a ideia de que a atuação contábil é eminentemente voltada para os homens. Com base no exposto, as mulheres podem até estar ganhando o \'jogo de números\', para tanto, arcam com um custo que implica a eliminação ou não evidenciação das características do gênero feminino. Ou seja, cresceu a participação feminina no mercado de trabalho, mas ainda há muitas barreiras, em boa medida subjetivas, estabelecidas via processos de fechamento, conforme foi visto, e que se impõem no percurso de uma mulher que almeja alcançar êxito em espaços de prestígio, independentemente do seu nível de qualificação. O fenômeno conhecido como \"teto de vidro\" representa as várias barreiras simbólicas, impostas sutilmente - por isso ditas transparentes -, mas suficientemente fortes para impossibilitar a ascensão de mulheres aos mais altos postos da hierarquia organizacional. Se observado em termos de mercado, o fenômeno pode ser constatado em diferentes países. Esse cenário leva a acreditar que nesse processo de transformação social, em que são requeridos novos papéis, faz-se necessário revisitar perspectivas sobre identidade sexual, bem como rever a produção e manutenção dos discursos de gênero que dão sustentação a essas novas identidades. No Brasil, conforme dados já relatados, embora tenhamos avançado em termos de qualificação, a mulher ainda sofre restrições para acesso profissional e enfrenta condições desiguais de trabalho e remuneração. Parece existir um conjunto de barreiras reais e simbólicas que impedem as mulheres de ascender profissionalmente. Na área de contabilidade, as mulheres são expostas a discursos e práticas eminentemente machistas. Esses discursos estruturam práticas e reificam a leitura da mulher como incapaz de assumir funções de mais responsabilidade. Diante do exposto, e de um quadro de não acesso das mulheres a cargos de liderança, acredita-se que, em um processo de violência psíquica, o \"discurso contábil\" nega, particularmente à mulher negra - que ao longo de sua vida sofre três tipos específicos de discriminação: por ser mulher, por ser pobre, em sua maioria, e por ser negra - sua identidade como profissional habilitada para o exercício de suas funções, particularmente em espaços de poder e prestígio. Assim, o estudo teve por objetivo investigar se o fenômeno conhecido como \"teto de vidro\" (glass ceiling) está presente nas interações cotidianas, por meio de processos de sexualização e racialização enfrentados durante a trajetória acadêmica de mulheres negras, em contabilidade, no Brasil. Trata-se de uma pesquisa de abordagem qualitativa, a partir de um posicionamento pós-estruturalista, para a qual foram utilizadas técnicas autoetnográficas e de história oral, com dados coletados por meio de entrevistas semiestruturadas, realizadas em profundidade, com professoras egressas de programas de pós-graduação, analisados sob a perspectiva interpretativista. Os resultados encontrados demonstram que o fenômeno conhecido como \"teto de vidro\" também está presente na contabilidade, o que resulta em barreiras específicas do campo. Para chegar a esse resultado, foi preciso superar algumas limitações, sendo a principal a falta de incentivo para o desenvolvimento do estudo, dado o caráter inovador da proposta, em uma área de conhecimento e em um lócusem que os estudos interdisciplinares ainda são a exceção. Obras sobre gênero e raça, até aqui, não foram objeto de estudos na contabilidade no Brasil. No entanto, espera-se que esta pesquisa possa funcionar como uma abertura para novos estudos nessa temática. Com isso, a contabilidade estará agindo diretamente para a promoção da igualdade, rompendo com fechamentos estabelecidos, e, portanto, para a transformação social.
Through the last two decades, our society has experienced profound social changes. According to data from the Brazilian Statistics Bureau (IBGE)\'s Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios (PNAD, the National Household Sampling Survey), women had an average 5,2 years of study in 1992 which grew to 7,7 years in 2009, rising 47% (IBGE apud Ipea, 2010). Data from the Ministry of Labor (MTE, 2013) shows that female participation in the formal job market rose, yet women with higher education degrees still receive only 60% of men\'s salaries as remuneration. Ipea (2011) data on income show that the per capita family income of a family headed by a white man is 997 Brazilian Reais (R$), while for a family headed by an black women is only R$ 491 - that is, less than half that of a white man\'s family, running counter to the oft-heralded Brazilian \'racial democracy\'. In spite of the increase in the number of women in the job market, according to Peggy, Dwyer and Roberts (2004) the gender agenda of the accounting profession facilitates the north-american imperialist project by enabling firms to employ competent female workers at minimal cost; this would be related to the domesticity ideology, that is, the idea that domestic life is the ideal life for women. Further studies such as that of Bebbington, Thomson and Wall (1997) conclude that accounting students tend to express their gender through masculine or androgynous identities rather than feminine, in accordance to Butler\'s (2012) theory of performativity which states that gender roles are performed as a result of social influences. This \'masculinization\' of accounting students results from the upkeep of stereotypes, such as the idea that accounting is eminently male. Based on this, Bebbington et al (1997) conclude that \"women may be winning the \'numbers game\' but at a cost--that cost being the elimination of feminine gender characteristics\". In other words, female participation in the job market has risen, but there are still many barriers - a significant part of which are subjective - established through closure processesand these barriers impose themselves on the path of women who desire to succeed in positions of prestige, regardless of those women\'s qualification level. The phenomenon known as \'glass ceiling\' represents the various symbolic barriers, imposed subtly - thus transparent, like glass - but strongly enough that they prevent women from rising to the higher positions of the organization hierarchy. Observed in market terms, the phenomenon can be found to happen in many different countries around the world. This scenario has led us to believe that in this process of social transformation, in which new roles are required, revising perspectives on gender identity is necessary, as well as reviewing the production and maintenance of the gender discourses that support these new identities. In Brazil, as per previously related data, in spite of the advances in terms of qualification, women still suffer with unequal work conditions and restrictions to professional access. There seems to exist a group of real and symbolic barriers that keep women from climbing the career ladder. In accounting, women are exposed to eminently machist discourses and practices; the former structure the latter and reify the image of women as being unable to assume positions of higher responsibility. In the face of this and of a scenario in which women are denied access to leadership positions, it is believed that black women are particularly denied by the \'accounting discourse\'; discriminated throughout their lives not only for being women, but also for being black and often poor, they are, through a process of psychological violence, denied their identity as professionals enabled to exercise their functions, especially in positions of power and prestige. Thus, the goal of this study is to investigate whether the phenomenon known as glass ceiling is present in day-to-day interactions, in the form of sexualization and racialization processes faced by black women along their academic trajectories in Brazilian accounting. The research follows a qualitative approach from a poststructuralist stance, using autoethnographic and oral history techniques; data was collected through semistructured interviews, realized in depth with PhD/Master professors and analyzed from the interpretivist perspective. The results found show that the glass ceiling phenomenon is also present in accounting, resulting in barriers specific to the field. To reach this result some limitations needed to be overcome, the main one being the lack of incentive to the development of the study given the innovative character of the proposal - especially in a field and in a locus in which interdisciplinary studies are still the exception. Studies on both gender and race have not, until now, been objects of study in Brazilian accounting. However, I hope this research may pave a way for future works in this theme. With this, accounting will be acting directly towards the promotion of equality, breaking through established closures and enabling social change.

This qualitative study explores the interrelationship between perceived gender discrimination and its antecedents and consequences while examining the concept of the glass ceiling that presents some barriers to the career advancement of Bahraini female workers in the banking sector. The study examines female bankers’ perception of the existence of both gender discrimination and the glass ceiling concept in this sector. It first examines the factors that cause such phenomena at three different levels namely societal, institutional and individual. The study then verifies the effects of some identified antecedents i.e. whether they foster or lower the perceived gender discrimination and how such effects happen. Furthermore, the study examines the same factors to ascertain if they are barriers that hinder women’s career advancement or enablers that support their advancement as there is a lack of empirical studies on the effect of the factors of the three mentioned levels to women’s career advancement especially in non-western context (Tlaiss, 2010; Hejase et al., 2013; Yokkongdi & Benson, 2005). The study also examines the consequences of perceived gender discrimination that occurs at the individual level. Some previous studies related to this research topic adopted the quantitative approach, hence; this is a qualitative based research that examines the perception of the respondents whose experiences and opinions expound the context. This led to understanding subjective areas such as respondents’ emotions and experiences that address the nature of perceived gender discrimination and the concept of glass ceiling in the Bahraini banking sector, focusing on “How” and “Why” type of questions instead of stressing on the quantities. The existing literature of gender discrimination especially about the area of underrepresentation of female workers in higher positions especially in financial services sector including banking is minimal. (Bruckmuller & Branscombe, 2010; Elumti et al., 2009; Durbin & Conley, 2010). This approach unveils the research questions by conducting in-depth semi-structured interviews with 26 Bahraini females as most of the previous studies examined both male and female perceptions while this research focusing at female only to make it more gender specific. The respondents hold managerial and non-managerial positions in both Islamic and conventional banks in the kingdom of Bahrain. The aim of the interview was to extract their perceptions on the factors and the consequences of gender discrimination as well as the barriers and challenges that hinder their advancement to higher managerial levels. The study captures the factors and the consequences of gender discrimination as well as the most common barriers that impede the Bahraini females’ career advancement within an Islamic and Arabic cultural context. The themes that emerged from the analysis are used to discuss the research issues in the light of previous research findings from different empirical studies. This study identifies different ways of finding factors of perceived gender discrimination and their effects as well as the challenges that may hinder the women’s career advancement in this sector. This study discovers that perceived gender discrimination exists in the Bahraini banking sector especially in areas such as hiring preference and receiving of benefits and compensations. This study also unearths the existence of glass ceiling, which is related to the gender inequality in the advancement opportunities to higher positions especially in the areas such as obtaining a promotion and holding managerial positions in the banks. The study finds out various factors that cause the perceived gender discrimination and the glass ceiling in the Bahraini banking sector which are classified at three levels as explained above.

Men continue to outnumber women in public school superintendent roles by a 4:1 ratio. However, women outnumber men by a 4:1 ratio in teaching roles in public school districts. In addition, more women than men hold superintendent certificates and educational doctorates. Due to this puzzling discrepancy, it is important to understand possible factors in the form of gendered barriers to access that could lead to the unequal representation of women in superintendent positions. In this study, I examined how these barriers manifested in the experiences of female superintendents participating in the study, how they influenced the hiring experiences of these participants, and how they impacted these female leaders throughout their careers. With this study, I investigated barriers associated with holding mechanisms, gendered norms, and gendered filters that may limit women's access to superintendent roles. Women's experiences of the origins and effects of gender normative perceptions and hiring practices have potential for contributing to the study of gender equity in the field of education and beyond. Findings could provide implications for increasing women's opportunities to serve beyond central office positions in public school districts. Possibilities exist for identifying practices in organizations that have hired women to serve at the highest level of school district leadership; that of the superintendent of schools.

碩士
世新大學
行政管理學研究所(含碩專班)
93
Abstract Female recruitment has been proceeding more than fifty years in R.O.C. military. The number of female promoting to a general level, however, remains single digital. The female student’s entrance scores are normally higher than males’ and the entire performances are also superior to male students. Nevertheless, the female’s development in military career is inferior to the male that graduated in the same year. Developing their military career, women encounter an intangible obstruction—“a glass ceiling.” General speaking, married servicewomen are difficult to look after both sides of their work and family due to the time and complicated work. Subject to the limit of position, the authorities will actively consider whether the female would be proper to promote because the mission might be affected that result from their caring of their families. The female military, thus, are deprived of competing with the opposite sex. Are the stereotypical cognition of gender and “the Glass Ceiling Effect” the factors that affect the development and promotion of female in the military? Jing-jin Program, a downsizing project introduced by Ministry of National Defense (MND), ROC, makes more impact and affection than ever. Although many relative measures have been implemented, the female military still got the most impact. This study has a close review on the impact of the Jing-jin Program to servicewoman from the women side. There are four consequences of this study: 1.The Glass Ceiling Effect does exist in the military organization. 2.Profession discrimination resulted from the stereotypical cognition of gender causes servicewomen unable to take certain task so as to affect their practical works experiences, and the opportunities of promoting to the higher level. 3.Gender causes women’s promotion more difficult than mans’. 4.In a military organization, female is still hard to get into the decisive cord.

碩士
國立成功大學
國際企業研究所
107
Change above the Glass Ceiling: Internationalization, CEO Characteristics, and Corporate Social Responsibility from the Institutional Theory Perspective Author: Wei-Ting Wang Advisor: Wen-Ting Lin Institute of International Business, National Cheng Kung University SUMMARY The purpose of this thesis is to understand how it affects companies to deal with gender diversity issue while facing the outer institutional environment, such as foreign investments, foreign markets, and professional groups based on the institutional theory perspective. Meanwhile, this study not only investigated the effects of external environment, but also considered the internal corporate conditions like CEO characteristics, especially on CEO narcissism and CEO hubris, as moderators so as to provide a more complete research. This study used 390 Taiwanese listed firms on TEJ database from 2016 to 2017 as the samples. The empirical evidence indicates that both foreign investment and CSR performances in host countries are positively related to gender diversity. Furthermore, this study points out that corporate governance evaluation performance strengthens these two positive relationships, and both positive relationships are weaker when the CEO is hubris Also, the positive relationship between foreign investment and gender diversity is stronger when the CEO is narcissism. This study has important theoretical contributions. First, in the past studies on internationalization, scholars paid more attention on cross-cultural management, while in this study we try to connect the corporate internationalized process with CSR strategies. Second, in the existing literatures, it was discussed about the corporate internationalized strategies and CSR activities mostly based on stakeholder theory and agency cost theory, but in this study we use institutional theory to describe the relationship between the corporate internationalized strategies and CSR activities t. Third, although the main idea of this study is related to CSR strategies, it covers strategic human resource management, to define the interaction among internationalized activities, CSR strategies, and labor recruitment. Also, we make the contingency perspective of SHRM fruitful by linking up with institutional theory. Key words: Corporate Social Responsibility, Institutional Theory, CEO Narcissism, CEO Hubris INTRODUCTION In recent years, “Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)” has become a globally focused issue in industrial, political, and academic areas. In particular “gender diversity” is one of important indexes for companies to fulfill with their social responsibility in Taiwan. Because Taiwan’s traditional culture emphasizes on “Men are breadwinners; women are homemakers”. Despite rapid economic development in Taiwan, gender disparity in the workplace has persisted. Therefore, based on the institutional theory perspective, this study intends to explore how it affects companies to deal with the gender diversity when facing the outer institutional environment like foreign investments, foreign markets, professional groups, and so on. In addition, this study would like to understand the moderating effects from CSR awards, corporate operative performances, CEO narcissism, and CEO hubris. MATERIALS AND METHODS We used 390 Taiwanese listed companies from 2016-2017. The samples used for this study are obtained from the Taiwan Economic Journal (TEJ). Moreover, we took reference on Common Wealth Magazine and Global Views Monthly to collect CSR rewarding datum, Taipei Exchange official website for corporate governance evaluation performance datum, and RebocoSam’s ranking for CSR performance of host countries. Descriptive statistics analysis and multiple regression analysis are applied in this empirical research. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The empirical results show that the positive relationship between the internationalization, including both foreign investment and CSR performance in host countries, and gender diversity are supported. As for the moderating effects, corporate governance evaluation performance and CEO hubris are supported. However, as for the moderating effect on CSR awards, it’s not supported. The last moderating effect on CEO narcissism is only partially supported. CONCLUSION In this study, we have introduced institutional theory perspective and developed the idea that how foreign investment and CSR performance in host affect firm’s CSR. There are some theoretical contributions. First, why do firms vary so much in their stances toward corporate social responsibility? Base on stakeholder theory or agency cost theory, previous researchers have overwhelmingly pursued the idea that firms engage in CSR strictly in proportion to how much pressure they are under to do so, either from external forces or because of their own size and prominence. Unlike the dominant stakeholder or agency cost perspectives, our study applied institutional theory to directly point out how corporate internationalization affects companies to plan for their CSR strategies. Second, the internationalization becomes a trend, many existing researches on international human resource management (IHRM) focused on cross-cultural management and expatriates. Our research presents a fresh issue on IHRM by emphasizing on how companies would accelerate their employment to fit the corporate international strategies when facing the corporate internationalization like foreign investment and foreign expansion. Third, in the strategic human resource management (SHRM), there’s no specific theory linked with the contingency perspective of SHRM, while we used the institutional theory to enrich this perspective, elaborating how companies would accelerate their female managers in different institutional environments. For practical implications, this study suggests Taiwanese companies paying attention to CSR issue if they require resources from foreign investor and plan to engage in international investment. Moreover, companies can consider joining formal and informal activities held by our public sectors to get more inspiration on CSR from the leading companies. Besides, some CEOs are more narcissistic while others may be more hubristic, but these two traits of CEOs hold different attitudes toward the extent to which their firms should engage in corporate social responsibility. The board directors should pay attention to their CEOs’ candidates.

Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI)
Previous research has found that the clarity of information provided to raters about women managers’ performance affects ratings of their competence, likeability, and overall evaluation. The current study sought to contribute to this literature by examining whether individual differences of raters can explain the reason for differential performance evaluations of male and female managers, despite them both performing equally. For this purpose, the current research extended the findings of Heilman and colleagues by replicating their methodology while introducing a moderator variable, the rater’s Implicit Person Theory (IPT). The IPT differentiates people into either entity theorists (that is, those who believe that behavior is trait-based and therefore fixed and stable) and incremental theorists (those who believe that behavior is situationally mediated and hence, changeable). Specifically, it was proposed that the effects found in the previous study would be stronger when the rater possessed an entity theory as opposed to an incremental theory. In doing so, this research attempted to provide an understanding of why male and female managers might be given different ratings, all other things being equal. Analyses revealed results that were consistent with, as well as some that were quite inconsistent with, previous findings. Rater IPT was found to have a significant effect on ratings provided by male participants but not those of female participants. Other findings and implications are discussed and limitations and future research directions are stated.