Academic literature on the topic 'Godwin, William, Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Godwin, William, Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Godwin, William, Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft"

1

Rzepka, Charles J. "England's First Family of Writers: Mary Wollstonecraft, William Godwin, Mary Shelley. Julie Carlson." Wordsworth Circle 39, no. 4 (2008): 152–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/twc24045229.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Pearson, Jacqueline. "England's First Family of Writers: Mary Wollstonecraft, William Godwin, Mary Shelley by Julie A. Carlson." Modern Language Review 104, no. 2 (2009): 556–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/mlr.2009.0317.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Wolfson, Susan J. "England's First Family of Writers: Mary Wollstonecraft, William Godwin, Mary Shelley. Julie A. Carlson. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007. Pp. xii+328." Modern Philology 107, no. 4 (2010): E117—E120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/651287.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Gomes, Anderson Soares. "A ciência monstruosa em 'Frankenstein': aspectos do pós-humano." Gragoatá 23, no. 47 (2018): 848. http://dx.doi.org/10.22409/gragoata.2018n47a1173.

Full text
Abstract:
Este trabalho tem por objetivo investigar de que maneira as descobertas e o pensamento científico do final do século XVIII e início do século XIX (período conhecido como Segunda Revolução Científica) influenciaram a escrita do romance Frankenstein (1818), de Mary Shelley, assim como analisar como essa obra apresenta aspectos que contribuem para o estudo do pós-humano. Frankenstein foi escrito em meio a um contexto de profundas revoluções no pensamento filosófico-científico que informaram diversos elementos presentes no romance: as teorias sociais de William Godwin e Mary Wollstonecraft, as hipóteses sobre o princípio da vida de Erasmus Darwin, os experimentos com eletricidade de Luigi Galvani, entre outros. Por outro lado, em uma perspectiva contemporânea, Frankenstein é uma obra que inaugura vários aspectos que viriam a ser lidos pelo prisma do pós-humano. Ao descrever as possíveis (e terríveis) consequências da junção da esfera do humano com as do animal e do tecnológico, o romance problematiza a posição privilegiada do homem na natureza. Considerando as características físicas e biológicas do monstro, o desejo de Frankenstein em ultrapassar os limites da natureza, e a complexa relação de ambos os personagens no que se refere ao binômio desejo/liberdade, o romance pode ser lido como um dos grandes representantes do conceito de pós-humanidade na literatura.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Franklin, Caroline. "JULIE A. CARLSON, England's First Family of Writers: Mary Wollstonecraft, William Godwin, Mary Shelley (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007), 328 pp. £33.50 hardback. 9780801886188." Romanticism 14, no. 3 (2008): 291–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/e1354991x08000408.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Gomes, Anderson Soares. "A ciência monstruosa em 'Frankenstein': aspectos do pós-humano." Gragoatá 23, no. 47 (2018): 848–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.22409/gragoata.v23i47.33606.

Full text
Abstract:
Este trabalho tem por objetivo investigar de que maneira as descobertas e o pensamento científico do final do século XVIII e início do século XIX (período conhecido como Segunda Revolução Científica) influenciaram a escrita do romance Frankenstein (1818), de Mary Shelley, assim como analisar como essa obra apresenta aspectos que contribuem para o estudo do pós-humano. Frankenstein foi escrito em meio a um contexto de profundas revoluções no pensamento filosófico-científico que informaram diversos elementos presentes no romance: as teorias sociais de William Godwin e Mary Wollstonecraft, as hipóteses sobre o princípio da vida de Erasmus Darwin, os experimentos com eletricidade de Luigi Galvani, entre outros. Por outro lado, em uma perspectiva contemporânea, Frankenstein é uma obra que inaugura vários aspectos que viriam a ser lidos pelo prisma do pós-humano. Ao descrever as possíveis (e terríveis) consequências da junção da esfera do humano com as do animal e do tecnológico, o romance problematiza a posição privilegiada do homem na natureza. Considerando as características físicas e biológicas do monstro, o desejo de Frankenstein em ultrapassar os limites da natureza, e a complexa relação de ambos os personagens no que se refere ao binômio desejo/liberdade, o romance pode ser lido como um dos grandes representantes do conceito de pós-humanidade na literatura. ---DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22409/gragoata.2018n47a1173
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Hunting, Penelope. "A birth and a death: Mary Shelley née Godwin (1797–1851) and Mary Wollstonecraft Godwin (1759–1797)." Journal of Medical Biography 15, no. 3 (2007): 165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/j.jmb.2007.06-68a.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Dawson, P. M. S. "Review: The Mental Anatomies of William Godwin and Mary Shelley." Review of English Studies 53, no. 212 (2002): 563–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/res/53.212.563.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Clemit, Pamela. "Mary shelley and william godwin: a literary–political partnership, 1823–36." Women's Writing 6, no. 3 (1999): 285–395. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09699089900200102.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Cameron, Lauren. "Mary Shelley's Malthusian Objections in The Last Man." Nineteenth-Century Literature 67, no. 2 (2012): 177–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/ncl.2012.67.2.177.

Full text
Abstract:
This essay considers Mary Shelley's The Last Man (1826) as intervening in the ongoing debate between Thomas Malthus and William Godwin. Malthus published An Essay on the Principle of Population (1798) in large part as a response to Godwin's Enquiry Concerning Political Justice (1793) and “Of Avarice and Profusion” (1797); Godwin later wrote an extended refutation of Malthus in Of Population (1820). Mary Shelley uses The Last Man, a story of the end of the human species, in part as a meditation on the merits of Malthus's philosophical positions in the Essay on the Principle of Population, but she seems to disagree with a number of the mechanisms he identifies: in contrast to Malthus, Shelley identifies a blind and random nature rather than any divine plan as controlling population change, and disease rather than food scarcity as the primary cause of population reduction, but insists upon the importance of individuating and empathizing with the suffering.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Godwin, William, Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft"

1

Bell, Vivienne Ann. "William Godwin and Frankenstein : the secularization of Calvinism in Godwin's philosophy and the sub-Godwinian Gothic novel ; with some remarks on the relationship of the Gothic to Romanticism /." Title page, contents and summary only, 1993. http://web4.library.adelaide.edu.au/theses/09ARM/09armb435.pdf.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Stewart, James C. "The ghost of Godwin intertextuality and embedded correspondence in the works of the Shelley circle /." Birmingham, Ala. : University of Alabama at Birmingham, 2008. https://www.mhsl.uab.edu/dt/2008m/stewart.pdf.

Full text
Abstract:
Thesis (M.A.)--University of Alabama at Birmingham, 2008.<br>Additional advisors: Randa Graves, Daniel Siegel, Samantha Webb. Description based on contents viewed Feb. 10, 2009; title from PDF t.p. Includes bibliographical references (p. 68-71).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Roy, Malini. "Shape-shifters : Romantic-era representations of the child in the Wollstonecraft-Godwin family circle." Thesis, University of Oxford, 2008. http://ora.ouls.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:59d59e07-eb4d-46b3-a7c972cd12102b2d.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Ogawa, Kimiyo. "Eighteenth-century medical discourse and sensible bodies : sensibility and selfhood in the works of William Godwin, Mary Wollstonecraft and Mary Shelley." Thesis, University of Glasgow, 2004. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/3944/.

Full text
Abstract:
In Eighteenth-Century Medical Discourse and Sensible Bodies: Sensibility and Selfhood in the Works of William Godwin, Mary Wollstonecraft and Mary Shelley, I examine how medical, philosophical and theological discourses on sensibility and on selfhood mutually informed one another in the historical moment of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries in England. The key to unravelling the complex notion of sensibility principally lies in the medical discourse that investigated the source of motion, knowledge, and moral feelings. I focus on the medical tracts which can be seen as discursive responses to Locke’s epistemology. In addition, I read eighteenth-century philosophical texts and analysed some of the political debates on the French Revolution. The theory of associationism which is predicted on the study of nerves and sense-impressions throws some light on a particular aspect of sensibility which explores epistemological issues and character formation. I show how the nerve theory operated in gender specific ways, so exposing the gender bias of supposedly objective medical science. The specific writers I discuss, Godwin, Wollstonecraft and Shelley, all address the associations theory directly. A close examination of their appropriation of medical language reveals that the image of the sensible body was a constant source of inspiration, and that their literary production was a continual process of re-figuring such a medicalised body. My project attempts to make sense of the equivocal position of Godwin and Wollstonecraft, who, while upholding rationalism, avow sensibility in their literary and non-literary works. The underlying contradictions between the associationism and the authority of the individual’s mind run deep. Rather than illustrating feminine reticence in Shelley’s Frankenstein as a cultural reflection of a “proper lady,” I argue that her characterisation of the monster and of female characters must be read as complex articulations of her sentiments about the discourses on sensibility and the problem of human agency.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Smith, Abigail M. "The reception of the life and work of Mary Wollstonecraft in the early American republic." Thesis, Available from the University of Aberdeen Library and Historic Collections Digital Resources, 2009. http://digitool.abdn.ac.uk:80/webclient/DeliveryManager?application=DIGITOOL-3&owner=resourcediscovery&custom_att_2=simple_viewer&pid=26523.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Chatterjee, Ranita. "Dialogues of desire, intertextual narration in the works of Mary Shelley and William Godwin." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1998. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/tape15/PQDD_0009/NQ32305.pdf.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Barrett, Redfern Jon. "Queer friendship : same sex love in the works of Thomas Gray, Anna Seward, Mary Wollstonecraft and William Godwin." Thesis, Swansea University, 2010. https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa43030.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Kong, Ching-man Paula. "Powerful obsession : variations on a theme in four fictions : Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, Joseph Conrad's Heart of darkness, William Golding's Lord of the flies and the spire /." Hong Kong : University of Hong Kong, 1997. http://sunzi.lib.hku.hk/hkuto/record.jsp?B1868550X.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Harris, Cassondra Fay. "Vice or Virtue? American Interpretations of Elizabeth Whitman and Mary Wollstonecraft in the Late Eighteenth Century." Ohio Dominican University / OhioLINK, 2019. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=odu1556907844923407.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Leclair, Marion. "Politique et poétique du roman radical en Angleterre (1782-1805)." Thesis, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 2018. http://www.theses.fr/2018USPCA080/document.

Full text
Abstract:
Cette thèse étudie un corpus de romans anglais, encore peu étudiés en France et jamais étudiés collectivement, publiés entre 1782 et 1805 par des écrivains et des écrivaines se rattachant par leurs idées et, pour certains, leur militantisme actif, au mouvement radical qui se développe en Angleterre dans la seconde moitié du XVIIIe siècle, s’amplifie et s’organise sous l’impulsion de la Révolution française, puis, sévèrement réprimé par le gouvernement de William Pitt, s’effondre à la fin de la décennie. Cette séquence historique laisse des traces profondes dans l’œuvre des romanciers radicaux, dont beaucoup, comme William Godwin, Mary Wollstonecraft et John Thelwall, sont philosophes ou polémistes avant d’être romanciers et prennent la plume pour défendre les droits de l’homme (et de la femme) dans le débat anglais sur la Révolution française qui oppose Edmund Burke à Thomas Paine. En croisant l’histoire des idées politiques, l’histoire sociale et culturelle du mouvement radical, l’histoire du livre et la narratologie classique, ce travail s’efforce de mettre en lumière la façon dont les romans encodent une certaine idéologie politique dans leurs formes – du discours des locuteurs au format de publication des romans, en passant par leurs narrateurs, leurs intrigues, leurs personnages, leur style et leurs silences signifiants. Un tel examen fait ressortir, plutôt qu’une idéologie radicale unifiée, une tension récurrente entre deux versions, libérale et jacobine, bourgeoise et plébéienne, du radicalisme, dont l’articulation conflictuelle revêt différentes formes d’un auteur à l’autre et d’un terme à l’autre de la période étudiée, à mesure que la réaction conservatrice enterre les espoirs radicaux de réformes<br>This dissertation examines a corpus of English novels which have been little studied in France as yet and never as a whole. The novels were published between 1782 and 1805 by a group of writers who, by their ideas and in some cases active political commitment, belong to the radical movement which developed in England in the second half of the eighteenth century, gained impetus and structure in the wake of the French Revolution, and collapsed at the end of the decade when faced with repression from the government of William Pitt. Radical novelists, many of whom, like William Godwin, Mary Wollstonecraft and John Thelwall, were philosophers and pamphleteers before they took to novel-writing, flew to the defence of the rights of man (and of the rights of woman) in the revolution controversy which pitted Thomas Paine against Edmund Burke – and their work bears the mark of the rise and demise of the radical movement. Combining intellectual history with classical narratology, book history, and the social and cultural history of radicalism, this dissertation seeks to highlight the way in which political ideology is built into the very forms of the novels – in the characters’ speech and the characters themselves, in the novels’ plot and narration type, in their style and publishing format, as well as in their meaningful silences. Such a study brings to light, rather than a coherent radical ideology, a recurring tension between two versions of radicalism, liberal and jacobin, bourgeois and plebeian, whose partly conflicting conjunction assumes different shapes from one novelist to the other and between the early 1780s and late 1790s, as radical hopes of reform sink under the conservative backlash
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Godwin, William, Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft"

1

England's first family of writers: Mary Wollstonecraft, William Godwin, Mary Shelley. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Romantic narrative: Shelley, Hays, Godwin, Wollstonecraft. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Brewer, William D. The mental anatomies of William Godwin and Mary Shelley. Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2001.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

"My hideous progeny": Mary Shelley, William Godwin, and the father-daughter relationship. University of Delaware Press, 1995.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Hill-Miller, Katherine. My hideous progeny: Mary Shelly, William Godwin, and the father-daughter relationship. University of Delaware Press, 1995.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

The Godwinian novel: The rational fictions of Godwin, Brockden Brown, Mary Shelley. Clarendon Press, 1993.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

The Godwins and the Shelleys: The biography of a family. Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

The Godwins and the Shelleys: The biography of a family. Faber, 1990.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

The Godwins and the Shelleys: The biography of a family. Norton, 1989.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

The Godwins and the Shelleys: The biography of a family. Faber and Faber, 1989.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Godwin, William, Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft"

1

Crook, Nora, and Lisa Vargo. "Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley, née Godwin (1797–1851)." In The Routledge Companion to Romantic Women Writers. Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315613536-47.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Shelley, Mary. "Mary Shelley: Life of William Godwin." In Wollstonecraft. Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429348266-47.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft. "Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley, ‘Life of William Godwin’ [1836–40]." In Godwin. Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429348259-25.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Miles, Robert. "History/Genealogy/Gothic: Godwin, Scott and their Progeny." In The Gothic and Theory. Edinburgh University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474427777.003.0002.

Full text
Abstract:
This essay argues that William Godwin's theory of historical romance may be placed in productive dialogue with Michel Foucault's influential preference for Nietzschean 'genealogy' over conventional history. For both, a narrative capable of unfolding the motive forces of history will necessarily be dispersed, contingent and fragmentary. This line of genealogical Gothic is traceable from Godwin through Wollstonecraft and Mary Shelley in England, and through Charles Brockden Brown and Herman Melville in America. In genealogical Gothic, history is expressed as trauma, as an originating event that leads to haunting and repetition experienced by the sufferer as (to use Melville's term) 'tranced grief'. These narratives may be contrasted with Walter Scott's versions of the historical romance, which look to narrate some kind of historical resolution to the conflicts of the past. In this respect, genealogical Gothic relates to Scott as New Historicism does to grand narratives.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Clemit, Pamela. "William Godwin." In Mary Wollstonecraft in Context. Cambridge University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781108261067.020.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Godwin, William. "Godwin: Letter to William Baxter." In Mary Shelley. Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429348273-51.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Clemit, Pamela. "Memoirs of William Godwin." In The Novels and Selected Works of Mary Shelley Mary Shelley. Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429349973-39.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Gee, Austin. "Letter to Mary Shelley." In Political and Philosophical Writings of William Godwin, edited by Mark Philp. Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429350108-14.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

"In feeling: William Godwin and Mary Wollstonecraft." In Harmless Lovers. Routledge, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315003597-13.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Clemit, Pamela. "Frankenstein, Matilda, and the legacies of Godwin and Wollstonecraft." In The Cambridge Companion to Mary Shelley. Cambridge University Press, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ccol0521809843.003.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography