Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Google Scholar metrics / Journal articles

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Google Scholar metrics.

Journal articles on the topic 'Google Scholar metrics'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 27 July 2025

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Google Scholar metrics.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Jacsó, Péter. "Google Scholar Metrics for Publications." Online Information Review 36, no. 4 (2012): 604–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14684521211254121.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Ali, Muhammad Yousuf, and Joanna Richardson. "Google Scholar Citation metrics of Pakistani LIS scholars: an overview." Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication 68, no. 4/5 (2019): 392–412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/gkmc-03-2018-0025.

Full text

Abstract:

Purpose The purpose of this study is to analyze the use of Google Scholar Citations’ profiling platform by library and information science (LIS) scholars in Pakistan. Design/methodology/approach Purposive sampling was used to collect Google Scholar Citations profiles between 15 November 2017 and 31 January 2018. Resultant data were analyzed in SPSS Version 21. Findings In terms of demographical data, the study results were consistent with previous studies of Pakistani LIS scholars. There were strong correlations between Google Scholar Citations metrics (publications, citations, h-index and i10

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Allo, Karmila Pare, and La Ode Ismail. "Google Scholar Metrics, Pengaruhnya pada Jurnal Ilmiah." Khizanah al-Hikmah : Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan, Informasi, dan Kearsipan 8, no. 1 (2020): 91. http://dx.doi.org/10.24252/kah.v8i1a10.

Full text

Abstract:

Google scholar merupakan mesin pencari yang membantu akademisi untuk menelusuri karya tulis ilmiah, seperti artikel jurnal yang telah diterbitkan di mana saja. Selain itu, media ini juga dapat digunakan oleh akademisi atau jurnal ilmiah untuk mengukur metrik perkembangan sitasinya dengan membuat profil pada Google Scholar Profile. Penelitian ini akan menggambarkan; 1) metrik sitasi Khizanah al-Hikmah : Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan, Informasi, dan Kearsipan (KAH-JIPIK), 2) jenis dokumen yang paling banyak menyitir, 3) artikel yang paling sering disitir, dan 4) manfaat yang dirasakan oleh KAH-JIPIK

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Delgado-López-Cózar, Emilio, and Rafael Repiso-Caballero. "The impact of scientific journals of communication: Comparing Google Scholar Metrics, Web of Science and Scopus." Comunicar 21, no. 41 (2013): 45–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.3916/c41-2013-04.

Full text

Abstract:

Google Scholar Metrics' launch in April 2012, a new bibliometric tool for the evaluation of scientific journals by means of citation counting, has ended with the duopoly exerted by the Web of Science and Scopus databases. This paper aims at comparing the coverage of these three databases and the similarity their journal rankings may have. We selected a sample of journals from the field of Communication Studies indexed in the three databases. Data was recollected on 1720 November, 2012. 277 journals were identified to which we calculated their hindex and ranked them according to such indicator.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Pinto, Adilson Luiz, Fabio Lorensi Do Canto, Edson Mario Gavron, and Marcos Talau. "Periódicos científicos brasileiros indexados no Google Scholar Metrics." Informação & Sociedade: Estudos 30, no. 4 (2020): 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.1809-4783.2020v30n4.57048.

Full text

Abstract:

Este trabalho tem o objetivo de identificar quantos periódicos científicos brasileiros são indexados pelo GoogleScholar Metrics e o de descrever as características das publicações. As variáveis analisadas são o escopo temáticoe o impacto (índice e mediana h5), a classificação Qualis, os idiomas do conteúdo, a periodicidade e a vinculaçãoinstitucional. Foram recuperados dados de 1.906 periódicos científicos brasileiros contidos no UlrichsWeb.Foi desenvolvido um script para busca e extração automatizada dos dados no sistema. Para os títulos nãoencontrados foi realizada uma busca manual. Foram id

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Researcher. "VARIOUS METRICS: A FOCUS ON GOOGLE SCHOLAR - A CASE STUDY." International Journal of Library and Information Science (IJLIS) 13, no. 2 (2024): 57–73. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637399.

Full text

Abstract:

This study compares Google Scholar with other research evaluation tools like Web of Science and Scopus, analyzing their strengths and weaknesses. It delves into various metrics used in academic research evaluation, such as citation counts, h-index, and journal-level metrics like Impact Factor. The study also explores modern metrics like altmetrics, i10 index, G-index, and h-core. Launched in 2004, Google Scholar offers comprehensive research coverage, including web citations and references, outperforming Web of Science and Scopus. Google Scholar Metrics and Scopus provide h-index and citation

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Orduña-Malea, Enrique, and Emilio Delgado López-Cózar. "Google Scholar Metrics evolution: an analysis according to languages." Scientometrics 98, no. 3 (2013): 2353–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1164-8.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Basavarajaiah Doddagangavadi Mariyappa, Gangabyrappana palya Hanumanthrayappa Hemantha Kumar, and Bhamidipathi Narasimhamurthy. "An author level metrics of scholarly impact journals; cited through Google Scholar Source." World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews 15, no. 3 (2022): 331–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2022.15.3.0952.

Full text

Abstract:

As academic journals have become more digital, scientific writers now have more chances to increase the visibility of their research and its citations globally. The metrics is the gold standard. It is used to decide the ranking and benchmark of the journals which will be determined using bibliometrics and different algorithms. Numerous predatory journals are lack of international standards and low quality. Authors will be unable to submit their research papers or reports to the journals for publication with a high impact factor in this circumstance. The main objective of this study is to focus

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Basavarajaiah, Doddagangavadi Mariyappa, palya Hanumanthrayappa Hemantha Kumar Gangabyrappana, and Narasimhamurthy Bhamidipathi. "An author level metrics of scholarly impact journals; cited through Google Scholar Source." World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews 15, no. 3 (2022): 331–39. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7766409.

Full text

Abstract:

As academic journals have become more digital, scientific writers now have more chances to increase the visibility of their research and its citations globally. The metrics is the gold standard. It is used to decide the ranking and benchmark of the journals which will be determined using bibliometrics and different algorithms. Numerous predatory journals are lack of international standards and low quality. Authors will be unable to submit their research papers or reports to the journals for publication with a high impact factor in this circumstance. The main objective of this study is to focus

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Oliveira J e Silva, Lucas, Graciela Maldonado, Tara Brigham, Aidan F. Mullan, Audun Utengen, and Daniel Cabrera. "Evaluating Scholars’ Impact and Influence: Cross-sectional Study of the Correlation Between a Novel Social Media–Based Score and an Author-Level Citation Metric." Journal of Medical Internet Research 23, no. 5 (2021): e28859. http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/28859.

Full text

Abstract:

Background The development of an author-level complementary metric could play a role in the process of academic promotion through objective evaluation of scholars’ influence and impact. Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the correlation between the Healthcare Social Graph (HSG) score, a novel social media influence and impact metric, and the h-index, a traditional author-level metric. Methods This was a cross-sectional study of health care stakeholders with a social media presence randomly sampled from the Symplur database in May 2020. We performed stratified random sampling

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

do Canto, Fabio Lorensi, Adilson Luiz Pinto, Edson Mário Gavron, and Marcos Talau. "Latin American and Caribbean journals indexed in Google Scholar Metrics." Scientometrics 127, no. 2 (2022): 763–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04237-x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Islam, Md., Anwarul, Ahmadul Islam Howlader, and Prodip Roy. "Google Scholar Metrics: Assessing LIS Researchers' Scholarship in a Developing Country." Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 59, no. 1 (2022): 712–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pra2.699.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Knudson, Duane. "Use of Sports as a Label in Google Scholar Profiles." Journal of Kinesiology & Wellness 14, no. 1 (2025): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.56980/jkw.v14i1.147.

Full text

Abstract:

Author profiles in academic social media and database services are important research search, access, and promotion tools. This study documented the use and relevance of sports as research interest areas using the “label” function in Google Scholar Profiles. Profiles and citation metrics for the top twenty Google Scholar Citations Profiles were extracted for 22 sports and four sport terms. Citations to the top twenty profiles for each term were classified as relevant to that sport research interest label if there were at least four publications on that sport. The number of profiles using any o

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Coelho Paraguassu, Eber. "BJIHS continues to increase its H index on Google Scholar." Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences 2, no. 6 (2020): 01–03. http://dx.doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2020v2n6p01-03.

Full text

Abstract:

Google Scholar is a Google search tool that allows you to search academic papers, school literature, university newspapers and various articles. Launched in November 2004, it started offering searches in Portuguese on January 10, 2006 [1]. Currently, the Google Scholar H index has become a CAPES evaluation criterion for classifying and ranking journals on the sucupira platform, through the Qualis note [2]. The BJIHS in just one year achieved the feat of having the H 6 index. This means that the newspaper has 6 articles with at least 6 citations within the Google Scholar database.&#

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Merga, Margaret K., Sayidi Mat Roni, and Shannon Mason. "Should Google Scholar be used for benchmarking against the professoriate in education?" Scientometrics 125, no. 3 (2020): 2505–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03691-3.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractIn the neoliberal environment of contemporary academia, an individual’s research rankings and outputs can shape their career security and progression. When applying for ongoing employment and promotional opportunities, academics may benchmark their performance against that of superior colleagues to demonstrate their performance in relation to their discipline. The H-index and citation rates are commonly used to quantify the value of an academic’s work, and they can be used comparatively for benchmarking purposes. The focus of this paper is to critically consider if Google Scholar be us

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Memisevic, Haris. "REVIEW: RESEARCH INTEREST SCORE IN RESEARCHGATE: THE SILVER BULLET OF SCIENTOMETRICS OR THE EMPEROR’S NEW CLOTHES?" Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics 3, no. 3 (2022): 187–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.47316/cajmhe.2022.3.3.05.

Full text

Abstract:

Introduction: Scientists have long searched for the best way to evaluate scientific performance and have come up with numerous indices. Probably, the most famous index is the h-index, a metric that has been used widely in science metrics ever since it appeared. In this study, I evaluated the potential of the new metric Research Interest Score created by ResearchGate (RG). Methods: I analyzed the different metric indices for 88 most cited researchers at the University of Sarajevo. In particular, the number of citations and h-indexes were taken from the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google S

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Delgado-López-Cózar, Emilio, and Álvaro Cabezas-Clavijo. "Google Scholar Metrics: an unreliable tool for assessing scientific journals." El Profesional de la Informacion 21, no. 4 (2012): 419–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2012.jul.15.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Franco Pérez, Álvaro Moisés. "Google Académico: el buscador especializado para la ayuda a la investigación." Hospital a Domicilio 7, no. 1 (2023): 31–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.22585/hospdomic.v7i1.188.

Full text

Abstract:

Google Académico (Google Scholar) es un buscador bibliográfico gratuito, especializado en recuperar documentos científicos de múltiples fuentes y en varias disciplinas. Por ejemplo, artículos científicos, tesis, patentes o libros, además de identificar las citas que éstos han recibido, ayudando a conocer el impacto de las publicaciones. Cabe destacar que Google Académico se complementa con Google Books, Google Patents, Google Scholar Metrics, citas de Google y con los enlaces a bibliotecas. Estas características hacen de Google Académico una herramienta ideal para buscar en diversas fuentes de

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Barón-Velandia, Benjamín, Adriana Marcela Gómez Bermúdez, and Erica María Ossa Taborda. "A selfie of Praxis Pedagogica journal from the perspective of Google Scholar metrics." We Journal Review 1, no. 1 (2024): 27–34. https://doi.org/10.38202/journal11.4.

Full text

Abstract:

The article presents an analysis of Praxis Pedagógica journal’s self-perception within the field of education, with a particular focus on its influence on research that explores pedagogical practices. A total of 132 publications indexed in Google Scholar between 2019 and 2023 are examined. By exporting data from the web (Scraping) to conduct a bibliometric analysis, a notable increase in citations is observed, particularly in the most recent publications within the observation window. The study concludes that there is a correlation between the visibility strategies implemented across academic,

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Jacsó, Péter. "Google Scholar Author Citation Tracker: is it too little, too late?" Online Information Review 36, no. 1 (2012): 126–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14684521211209581.

Full text

Abstract:

PurposeSeven years after the release of Google Scholar in 2004, it was enhanced by a new module, the Google Scholar Author Citation Tracker (GSACT), currently a small subset of the complete Google Scholar (GS) database. The aim of this paper is to focus on this enhancement.Design/methodology/approachThe paper discusses the Google Scholar Author Citation Tracker, its features, potential benefits and problems.FindingsGSACT allows registered users to create and edit their scientific profiles and some bibliometric indicators, such as the h‐index, total citation counts, and the i10 index. These met

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Burghardt, Kyle J., Bradley H. Howlett, Audrey S. Khoury, Stephanie M. Fern, and Paul R. Burghardt. "Three Commonly Utilized Scholarly Databases and a Social Network Site Provide Different, But Related, Metrics of Pharmacy Faculty Publication." Publications 8, no. 2 (2020): 18. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/publications8020018.

Full text

Abstract:

Scholarly productivity is a critical component of pharmacy faculty effort and is used for promotion and tenure decisions. Several databases are available to measure scholarly productivity; however, comparisons amongst these databases are lacking for pharmacy faculty. The objective of this work was to compare scholarly metrics from three commonly utilized databases and a social networking site focused on data from research-intensive colleges of pharmacy and to identify factors associated with database differences. Scholarly metrics were obtained from Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Greenberg, Riki, and Judit Bar-Ilan. "Library metrics – studying academic users’ information retrieval behavior: A case study of an Israeli university library." Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 49, no. 4 (2016): 454–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0961000616640031.

Full text

Abstract:

The purpose of this study is to get insights on library users’ information retrieval behavior, as reflected in log files, reports, and publishers’ counts. From the data it appears that the library’s discovery tool is not the major source for accessing full text items and the patrons often prefer other sources such as Google Scholar. Google Scholar cannot replace the library, but it can link users to resources that the patrons can access, through library subscriptions.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Saberi, Mohammad Karim, and Faezeh Ekhtiyari. "Usage, captures, mentions, social media and citations of LIS highly cited papers: an altmetrics study." Performance Measurement and Metrics 20, no. 1 (2019): 37–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/pmm-10-2018-0025.

Full text

Abstract:

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the usage, captures, mentions, social media and citations of highly cited papers of Library and information science (LIS). Design/methodology/approach This study is quantitative research that was conducted using scientometrics and altmetrics indicators. The research sample consists of LIS classic papers. The papers contain highly cited papers of LIS that are introduced by Google Scholar. The research data have been gathered from Google Scholar, Scopus and Plum Analytics Categories. The data analysis has been done by Excel and SPSS application

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

C., Vysakh. "A Meta Analysis on the Correlation Between Traditional Metric Indicators and X Metrics of Library and Information Science Articles." DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology 44, no. 5 (2024): 307–13. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.44.5.19841.

Full text

Abstract:

Many researchers have examined citation-altmetric associations producing a wide range of observations. Thenegative and positive associations between these two metrics at various correlation levels create controversy inconsidering these metrics as replacements or complements for the research impact measurement. Very few studies tried to clarify this controversy by venturing into systematic analysis. Thus, the present study aims to find a solution by using meta-analysis to measure the Pooled Correlation Coefficient (PCOR) between the classic metric indicators and X metrics. Eligible articles for

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Nivens, Ryan Andrew, and Samuel Otten. "Assessing Journal Quality in Mathematics Education." Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 48, no. 4 (2017): 348–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.48.4.0348.

Full text

Abstract:

In this Research Commentary, we describe 3 journal metrics–the Web of Science's Impact Factor, Scopus's SCImago Journal Rank, and Google Scholar Metrics' h5-index—and compile the rankings (if they exist) for 69 mathematics education journals. We then discuss 2 paths that the mathematics education community should consider with regard to these citation-based metrics of journal quality: either working within the system to enhance our positioning or resisting or modifying the system itself.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Cordeiro, Kétsia Karine, and Jorge Moisés Kroll do Prado. "A atuação bibliotecária em equipes editoriais de periódicos científicos brasileiros indexados no Google Scholar Metrics." Informação@Profissões 13, no. 2/3 (2024): 38–59. https://doi.org/10.5433/2317-4390.2024v13n2/3p38.

Full text

Abstract:

Objetivo: A pesquisa investiga a atuação bibliotecária em periódicos científicos brasileiros indexados no Google Scholar Metrics. Os objetivos específicos delineados foram a) Mapear os periódicos científicos que possuem em suas equipes editoriais a atuação de um/a bibliotecário/a; b) Relacionar o índice de citação dos periódicos (Índice H5 e Qualis) com a presença ou não de bibliotecários/as nas equipes editoriais; c) Conhecer possibilidades de atuação para bibliotecários pela perspectiva dos editores de periódicos que não possuem o profissional em sua equipe. Metodologia: Tratou-se de uma pes

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Poornimadarshini, S., S. Sindhu, Saravanakumar Veerappan, N. Arvinth, and Saranya Muthusamy. "Bibliometric Analysis of IJISS Journal based on Citation and Publication Relevant Metrics." Indian Journal of Information Sources and Services 14, no. 4 (2024): 153–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.51983/ijiss-2024.14.4.24.

Full text

Abstract:

This research is a bibliometric assessment of the Google Scholar-indexed Indian journal of Information Sources and Services. The articles published in the journal between 2019 and 2024 are evaluated bibliometrically in this study. A data set was created using Microsoft Excel from information retrieved from the journal's website. By looking at things like document types, authors, Degree of collaboration, collaboration coefficient and collaboration indexes, and citation indicators, bibliometric assessments can get a sense of the composition and distribution of published works. In addition to the

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Orduna-Malea, Enrique, Alberto Martín-Martín, and Emilio Delgado López-Cózar. "Google Scholar como una fuente de evaluación científica: una revisión bibliográfica sobre errores de la base de datos." Revista española de Documentación Científica 40, no. 4 (2017): 185. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/redc.2017.4.1500.

Full text

Abstract:

Google Scholar es un motor de búsqueda académico y herramienta de descubrimiento lanzada por Google (ahora Alphabet) en noviembre de 2004. El hecho de que para cada registro bibliográfico se proporcione información acerca del número de citas recibidas por dicho registro desde el resto de registros indizados en el sistema (independientemente de su fuente) ha propiciado su utilización en análisis bibliométricos y en procesos de evaluación de la actividad académica, especialmente en Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades. No obstante, la existencia de errores, en ocasiones de gran magnitud, ha provocado

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

M., Bharathi, and Aditya Sai Srinivas T. "In the Footsteps of Giants: Navigating the World of Citation Indices." Recent Trends in Information Technology and its Application 7, no. 3 (2024): 9–17. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10951961.

Full text

Abstract:

<em>This paper explores the intricacies of scholarly impact measurement through citation indices, focusing on the widely used H-index and i10 index. Delving into the world of academic metrics, it elucidates how these indices gauge the influence and productivity of researchers. The discussion encompasses the H-index's nuanced evaluation of publications with a specified citation threshold and the i10 index's straightforward count of papers surpassing 10 citations. Emphasizing the significance of these metrics in academia, the abstract guides researchers in understanding and leveraging them effec

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Kumar, Umesh, and Madhusudan Margam. "Enhancing Research Visibility: Analyzing Anesthesia Faculty at AIIMS, New Delhi, on Google Scholar." TULSSAA Journal 12, no. 1 (2025): 19–35. https://doi.org/10.3126/tulssaa.v12i1.77248.

Full text

Abstract:

Research visibility is crucial in enhancing a researcher's academic recognition, accessibility, and impact. This study examines the research productivity and scholarly influence of faculty members in the Anesthesia Department at AIIMS, New Delhi, using Google Scholar metrics, including total publications, citation count, h-index, and i10-index. Among the 48 faculty members, only 27 have a Google Scholar profile, and just 12 have integrated a verified email ID, indicating limited adoption of the platform for academic visibility. The analysis of scholarly output reveals that Associate Professor

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Restrepo-Arango, Cristina. "Índice H de los investigadores del Sistema Nacional de Investigadores (SNI) del área de las Ciencias Sociales en México." Cuadernos de Investigaciones de Ciencias de la Información, no. 1 (October 31, 2016): 56–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.34295/cuinci.vi1.7.

Full text

Abstract:

Analizar la visibilidad de los investigadores del Sistema Nacional de Investigadores (SNI) en Web of Science (WoS), Scopus y Publish or Perish, mediante la búsqueda del índice h de 240 investigadores nacionales del área V de las ciencias sociales en México en Publish or Perish, Google Scholar Metrics, Web of Science y Scopus. Se encontró que los resultados muestran una gran polarización entre las 4 fuentes consultadas para obtener el índice h. La primera, Publish or Perish es la más incluyente en términos de citación, ya que se basa en las publicaciones que aparecen en el Google Académico y es

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Pavas, Andres. "Novelties in the 2017 SJR for Engineering journals ranking." Ingeniería e Investigación 38, no. 2 (2018): 3–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.v38n2.73400.

Full text

Abstract:

Recently the new results of Scimago Journal Rank-SJR, Journal Citation Report-JCR and Google Scholar Metrics for journals have been updated and published. This editorial note presents a comparative analysis of 2016 and 2017 SJR ranking, pointing out differences in journal performance.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Sallam, Malik. "Bibliometric top ten healthcare-related ChatGPT publications in the first ChatGPT anniversary." Narra J 4, no. 2 (2024): e917. http://dx.doi.org/10.52225/narra.v4i2.917.

Full text

Abstract:

Since its public release on November 30, 2022, ChatGPT has shown promising potential in diverse healthcare applications despite ethical challenges, privacy issues, and possible biases. The aim of this study was to identify and assess the most influential publications in the field of ChatGPT utility in healthcare using bibliometric analysis. The study employed an advanced search on three databases, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, to identify ChatGPT-related records in healthcare education, research, and practice between November 27 and 30, 2023. The ranking was based on the retrieve

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Giri, Subham, and Rupak Charkarvaty. "Google Scholar Adoption by LIS Educators in India: An Exploratory Study." Library Philosophy and Practice (LPP), no. 5927 (June 20, 2021): 27. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5168920.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Google Scholar (GS) is one of the popular online databases fulfilling the research needs of academicians by providing an open and freely accessible platform for searching scholarly research along with basic research metrics (citations, h-index, i10, etc.) to assess productivity of an author or researcher. Now that GS is being used to measure the research performance of individual’s as-well-as institutions, it becomes very important to maintain a verified profile. This paper aims to analyse dual inter-related issues. Quantify LIS schools in India are the primary focus area of the

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Wadhwa, Vibhor, George K. Vilanilam, and Jeffrey Forris Beecham Chick. "Disparities in Citation Metrics Amongst Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for Interventional Radiology Journals." CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 43, no. 10 (2020): 1583–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02535-0.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Memisevic, Haris. "Rethinking Research Metrics: The Performance Impact Score (PIS) as a Novel Alternative to the H-index." Multidisciplinarni Pristupi u Edukaciji i Rehabilitaciji 7, no. 9 (2025): 3–12. https://doi.org/10.59519/mper7101.

Full text

Abstract:

Providing an objective ranking of scientists based on their merit is a rather challenging task. Numerous factors complicate this endeavor, raising difficult questions about how such evaluations should be conducted. The goal of the present paper is to introduce a new measure for evaluating researchers’ performance, the Performance Impact Score (PIS), which combines both productivity and research impact. In this study, I compared the PIS with h-index scores for 108 researchers at the University of Sarajevo. More specifically, I examined the overlap between the top 20 researchers according to the

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Venerandi, Alessandro, Hal Mellen, Ombretta Romice, and Sergio Porta. "Walkability Indices—The State of the Art and Future Directions: A Systematic Review." Sustainability 16, no. 16 (2024): 6730. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su16166730.

Full text

Abstract:

This systematic review aims to illustrate the state of the art of walkability indices and future research directions. A comprehensive search in the general Google database and Google Scholar identified a total of 45 records published between 2005 and 2023. Using a selection process based on the PRISMA model, 32 records were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria. These are organized incrementally, highlighting their novelty relative to preceding studies, and divided into sectors of prevalent application. The 5Ds theory provides a first contribution by identifying walkability metrics base

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Singh, Vivek Kumar, Satya Swarup Srichandan, and Hiran H. Lathabai. "ResearchGate and Google Scholar: how much do they differ in publications, citations and different metrics and why?" Scientometrics 127, no. 3 (2022): 1515–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04264-2.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Delgado-López-Cózar, Emilio, and Álvaro Cabezas-Clavijo. "Ranking journals: could Google Scholar Metrics be an alternative to Journal Citation Reports and Scimago Journal Rank?" Learned Publishing 26, no. 2 (2013): 101–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/20130206.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

NOOR, UL SABAH, MURAD KHAN MUHAMMAD, TALIB RAMZAN, ZAFAR BUSHRA, and KASHIF HANIF MUHAMMAD. "AN EXTENDED BESPOKE APPROACH TO EVALUATE THE QUALITY OF UK UNIVERSITIES RESEARCH USING MULTIPLE SOURCES." Tianjin Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue yu Gongcheng Jishu Ban)/ Journal of Tianjin University Science and Technology 56, no. 09 (2023): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8343425.

Full text

Abstract:

<strong>Abstract </strong> People's reliance on the internet for acquiring institutional rankings to make comparisons has increased significantly in this day and age. Recently, researchers have begun to correlate institutional rank lists provided by government organizations such as the Research Excellence Framework (REF, UK) with ranked lists compiled by Google Scholar (GS). In this technological era, where well established tools Google Scholar and Microsoft Academic are complementing conventional sources Scopus and Web of Science. Unlike Google Scholar still provides the maximum coverage

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Spiroski, Mirko. "Current Biomedical Scientific Impact (2013) of Institutions, Academic Journals and Researchers in the Republic of Macedonia." PRILOZI 35, no. 3 (2014): 67–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/prilozi-2015-0010.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractAim: To analyse current ranking (2013) of institutions, journals and researchers in the Republic of Macedonia.Material and Methods: the country rankings of R. Macedonia were analyzed with SCImago Country & Journal Rank (SJR) for subject area Medicine in the years 1996-2013, and ordered by H-index. SCImago Institutions Rankings for 2013 was used for the scientific impact of biomedical institutions in the Republic of Macedonia. Journal metrics from Elsevier for the Macedonian scholarly journals for the period 2009-2013 were performed. Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP), the Im

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Liu, Zao. "Bibliometric Study of Family Studies Journals Using Journal Impact Factors, CiteScore and H-index." International Journal of Librarianship 6, no. 1 (2021): 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.23974/ijol.2021.vol6.1.174.

Full text

Abstract:

Although there are bibliometric studies of journals in various fields, the field of family studies remains unexplored. Using the bibliometric metrics of the two-year and five-year Journal Impact Factors, the H-index, and the newly revised CiteScore, this paper examines the relationships among these metrics in a bibliometric study of forty-four representative family studies journals. The citation data were drawn from Journal Citation Reports, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The correlation analysis found strong positive relationships on the metrics. Despite the strong correlations, discrepancies in

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

M., Bharathi, and Aditya Sai Srinivas T. "Beyond the H-Index: Unlocking Insights with Diverse Citation Tools." Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistical Analysis 5, no. 2 (2024): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10984407.

Full text

Abstract:

<em>Scholarly impact assessment relies heavily on citation analysis, with various platforms offering distinct methodologies and metrics. This abstract provides a concise overview of prominent citation analysis tools, including Dimensions, Google Scholar, Scimagojr, Scinapse, and Scopus. Each platform offers unique features and metrics, such as citation counts, h-indexes, and field-normalized impact measures, catering to diverse research needs. Researchers navigate these platforms to assess academic influence, track citation trends, and identify collaboration opportunities. Understanding the st

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Knudson, Duane. "Association of ResearchGate research influence score with other metrics of top cited sports biomechanics scholars." Biomedical Human Kinetics 15, no. 1 (2023): 57–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/bhk-2023-0008.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Study aim: Scientific networking sites are increasingly popular in connecting researchers and providing influence metrics, however the research on measures like the ResearchGate Research Influence Score (RG RIS) are limited. This study documented the associations between RG RIS, usage, and prestige metrics from Google Scholar (GS), RG, and Scopus for top cited scientists in sports biomechanics. Material and methods: Research usage (total citations: C), prestige (Hirsch index: h), and RG RIS metrics were extracted from GS, RG, and Scopus for the top sixty cited scholars that used eithe

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Insana, Giuseppe, Alexandr Ignatchenko, Maria Jesus Martin, Bateman Alex, and Consortium UniProt. "MBDBMetrics: An online metrics tool to measure the impact of biological data resources." Bioinformatics Advances 3, no. 1 (2023): vbad180. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10201472.

Full text

Abstract:

<strong>Motivation: </strong>There now exist thousands of molecular biology databases covering every aspect of biological data. This database infrastructure takes significant effort and funding to develop and maintain. The creators of these databases need to make strong justifications to funders to prove their impact or importance. There are many publication metrics and tools available such as Google Scholar to measure citation impact or AltMetrics covering multiple measures including social media coverage.<strong>Results: </strong>In this paper we describe a series of novel impact metrics tha

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Recima 21, Revista. "ARTIGOS MAIS CITADOS DA REVISTA." RECIMA21 - Revista Científica Multidisciplinar - ISSN 2675-6218 3, no. 1 (2022): e3122595. http://dx.doi.org/10.47820/recima21.v3i1.2595.

Full text

Abstract:

Com o objetivo de promover a ciência, bem como sua divulgação, a revista está premeando com um e-book os 10 artigos mais citados no ano de 2022, para reconhecimento dos autores.Todos os articulistas que submeteram artigos na revista concorreram sem precisar fazer inscrição ou pagar alguma taxa, basta ter submetido e aprovado para publicação um artigo. Cabe ressaltar que este ranking de citações foi medido pelo Google Scholar Metrics (Acadêmico). 

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Toussi, Nima Hamidi, Yi Nong (Richard) Wang, Hasan Jamil, and Madhumita Manna. "The impact of scholarly podcasts on research distribution and uptake in oncology." JCO Oncology Practice 20, no. 10_suppl (2024): 423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/op.2024.20.10_suppl.423.

Full text

Abstract:

423 Background: Scholarly podcasts have grown in number and popularity in the post-COVID era. While such podcasts aim to increase research readership and understanding, their impact on these areas has not been quantitatively established. We assessed the relationship between Oncology research podcasts and various research distribution metrics. Methods: All research articles published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology (JCO) from January 2023 to December 2023 were reviewed. Published research articles in the JCO not discussed on the JCO or ASCO Clinical Guidelines podcast were used as controls.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Abu-Taieh, Evon M. O. "Social Network Service for Scientists Difficulties Facing E-Publishing over Cloud Computing." International Journal of Technology Diffusion 7, no. 3 (2016): 10–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/ijtd.2016070102.

Full text

Abstract:

This paper illustrated the difficulties facing e-publishing over cloud computing pertaining to social network service for scientists from three axioms: the life cycle of the research document, an explanation of what a researcher juggles during the course of the production of the document related to research. Then this paper discussed discovering study of the researcher knowledge pertaining to both social network service for scientists, scholarly search engines and citation indices. The first axiom reflected the life cycle of the research paper and how each phase affects and influences the next

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Bradshaw, Corey J. A., Justin M. Chalker, Stefani A. Crabtree, et al. "A fairer way to compare researchers at any career stage and in any discipline using open-access citation data." PLOS ONE 16, no. 9 (2021): e0257141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257141.

Full text

Abstract:

The pursuit of simple, yet fair, unbiased, and objective measures of researcher performance has occupied bibliometricians and the research community as a whole for decades. However, despite the diversity of available metrics, most are either complex to calculate or not readily applied in the most common assessment exercises (e.g., grant assessment, job applications). The ubiquity of metrics like the h-index (h papers with at least h citations) and its time-corrected variant, the m-quotient (h-index ÷ number of years publishing) therefore reflect the ease of use rather than their capacity to di

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Mazaheri Habibi, Mohammad Reza, Fahimeh Mohammad Abadi, Hamed Tabesh, Hasan Vakili Arki, Ameen Abu-Hanna, and Saeid Eslami. "Overview and Classification of Evaluation Metrics of Appointment Scheduling Systems." Frontiers in Health Informatics 13 (March 1, 2024): 192. http://dx.doi.org/10.30699/fhi.v13i0.573.

Full text

Abstract:

Introduction: This study reviews the several metrics used to evaluate the performance of appointment scheduling systems.Material and Methods: The articles in English were searched using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases and Google scholar search engine until July 23, 2023. We used queueing theory to classify evaluation metrics.Results: Out of 23403 articles, 75 papers were prepared for detailed analysis. We classify evaluation metrics of appointment scheduling system along with their definition and frequency of use. A total of 24 measures containing twelve (%50), seven (%29), and fi

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!