Academic literature on the topic 'Gospel of John'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Gospel of John.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Gospel of John"

1

Falkenberg, René. "Apocryphal Gospel Titles in Coptic." Religions 13, no. 9 (August 29, 2022): 796. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rel13090796.

Full text
Abstract:
During the 2nd–5th centuries, the usual format of the canonical gospel title is “The Gospel According to [person]”. While becoming well-established in this period, the title is reused and transformed when naming the apocryphal gospels. In order to study the meaning of the emerging canonical and apocryphal gospel titles, the claims of these titles will be analysed to determine who each title presents as the gospel’s source (often a divine figure) and who is implied to be that gospel’s author (often a human person). By revisiting well-known apocryphal gospels, and expanding on their number, new insights are achieved regarding the role of titles, authors, and apocryphal gospels. Results concern, for instance, the long recension of the Apocryphon of John, whose title comes to display a prominent gospel title; the Gospel of Judas, of which the author may be the infamous Judas himself; and the Gospel of Truth, which may not be an apocryphal gospel at all.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

KÖSTENBERGER, ANDREAS J., and STEPHEN O. STOUT. ""The Disciple Jesus Loved": Witness, Author, Apostle — A Response to Richard Bauckham's Jesus and the Eyewitnesses." Bulletin for Biblical Research 18, no. 2 (January 1, 2008): 209–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/26423844.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Richard Bauckham's Jesus and the Eyewitnesses: The Gospels as Eyewitness Testimony (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2006) makes a persuasive argument that the Gospels display eyewitness testimony and thus renews the quest for the identity of the Beloved Disciple as the author of the Fourth Gospel. While Bauckham attributes this Gospel to "the presbyter John" mentioned by Papias, the authors of this study show that the patristic evidence more likely seems to support the authorship of John the apostle and that the literary device of inclusio in the Fourth Gospel, astutely observed by Bauckham, also favors the authorship of John the son of Zebedee.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

KÖSTENBERGER, ANDREAS J., and STEPHEN O. STOUT. ""The Disciple Jesus Loved": Witness, Author, Apostle — A Response to Richard Bauckham's Jesus and the Eyewitnesses." Bulletin for Biblical Research 18, no. 2 (January 1, 2008): 209–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/bullbiblrese.18.2.0209.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Richard Bauckham's Jesus and the Eyewitnesses: The Gospels as Eyewitness Testimony (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2006) makes a persuasive argument that the Gospels display eyewitness testimony and thus renews the quest for the identity of the Beloved Disciple as the author of the Fourth Gospel. While Bauckham attributes this Gospel to "the presbyter John" mentioned by Papias, the authors of this study show that the patristic evidence more likely seems to support the authorship of John the apostle and that the literary device of inclusio in the Fourth Gospel, astutely observed by Bauckham, also favors the authorship of John the son of Zebedee.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

BAUCKHAM, RICHARD. "Historiographical Characteristics of the Gospel of John." New Testament Studies 53, no. 1 (January 2007): 17–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0028688507000021.

Full text
Abstract:
While presupposing the widely accepted conclusion that the Gospel of John, like the other Gospels, is generically a bios, this article examines more distinctive features of this Gospel which it shares with ancient historiography: precise topography, precise chronology, selectivity, narrative asides, and claims to eyewitness testimony. In these respects the Gospel of John would have appeared to contemporary readers more like historiography than the Synoptics would. The problem of historiographical representation of speeches is solved differently by John from the way the Synoptics deal with it, but John's method of composing discourses and dialogues conforms to good historiographical practice as well as does that of the Synoptics.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Pummer, Reinhard. "Samaritans, Galileans, and Judeans in Josephus and the Gospel of John." Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus 18, no. 1 (January 31, 2020): 77–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/17455197-2019002.

Full text
Abstract:
The paper seeks to shed light on the ministry and reception of Jesus of Nazareth as perceived through the lens of the Gospel of John in the light of Samaritan, Galilean, and Judean perspectives. Flavius Josephus and the Samaritan tradition help us to gain a better understanding of certain details expressed or alluded to in the gospels. In particular, on the basis of these two sources the paper puts into context the gospel passage that is best informed about the relations between Samaritans and Jews, viz. John 4:1–42. It thus aims at elucidating the Samaritan references in the Gospel of John by current research on Samaritanism.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

McKinnish Bridges, Linda. "Aphorisms of Jesus in John: An Illustrative Look at John 4.35." Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus 9, no. 2-3 (2011): 207–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/174551911x612791.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThis literary genre, the aphorism, finds full expression in the Gospel of John. Vestiges of the world of orality, these 'gems of illumination' invite intense reflection and response as they illuminate not only the literary landscape of the Gospel but also provide a lens for viewing the Jesus tradition in the Gospel of John. My work is indebted to the research of J.D. Crossan, author of In Fragments who has written the definitive work on the aphorisms of Jesus in the Synoptic Gospels. More explorative work, however, is needed for the aphorisms of Jesus with particular focus on John's Gospel. Although the aphorisms of Jesus in John were omitted in the database of authentic sayings of Jesus compiled by the members of the Jesus Seminar, might these lapidary gems be placed on the table once more for exploration? While I am confident that the Johannine aphorisms lead us through the narrative landscape of the Gospel and even reveal distinctive aspects of the community, is it possible that they might also provide at least a brief glimpse of Jesus? Using the agrarian aphorism of Jn 4.35 as a showcase illustration, this article proposes to identify the form and function of the Johannine aphorism; to investigate the authenticity of the saying in Jn 4.34-35 using established criteria of authenticity; and to suggest the often-overlooked criterion of orality is a most useful tool for continued exploration.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Sheridan, Ruth. "Identity, Alterity, and the Gospel of John." biblical interpretation 22, no. 2 (February 18, 2014): 188–209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15685152-0022p05.

Full text
Abstract:
Post-classical narratologies are beginning to appreciate the ways in which identity and alterity are central to narrative. The Gospel of John has long been considered an artistically crafted narrative, yet little scholarly attention has been given to the dialectical interplay of identity and alterity in the Gospel narrative, except as this dialectic forms part of a larger examination of postcolonial discourse in John. Using insights from Monika Fludernik’s “natural” narratology and Lacanian psychoanalytic theory, this article argues that issues of identity and alterity are pivotal to the Gospel of John, particularly in the Gospel’s rhetoric of belief and its anti-Jewish tenor and substance.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Kirk, Alan. "Examining Priorities: Another Look at the Gospel of Peter's Relationship to the New Testament Gospels." New Testament Studies 40, no. 4 (October 1994): 572–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0028688500024000.

Full text
Abstract:
Ever since a fragment of the Gospel of Peter was discovered at Akhmîm in 1886–7, and published in 1892, scholarship has been divided over its relationship to the New Testament gospels. In 1892 J. Armitage Robinson argued that the gospel was a tendentious appropriation of canonical material which contained no traces of a primitive Urevangelium. In 1893 Adolf von Harnack argued tentatively for its independence from the canonical gospels, while Theodore Zahn argued for a late date and complete dependence upon the four gospels. In the flurry of articles and monographs which followed, scholars aligned themselves with one or the other of these two positions, depending upon whether they viewed the new gospel's similarities with, or divergences from, the New Testament gospels as being more decisive. Since both striking similarities and striking divergences appear throughout the Gospel of Peter, a stalemate was soon reached, and scholarly interest in the question declined. In the late 1920s Gardner-Smith could write that ‘interest in the discovery has waned’, and Léon Vaganay that ‘a virtual silence has fallen upon the journals’. In his commentary Vaganay attempted to settle the argument in favour of the Gospel of Peter's dependence. Using literary criticism he showed how the material in the gospel could be seen as a free literary re-working of the texts of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, a re-working driven by sectarian and apologetic interests, as well as by the personal predilections of its author.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Pentkovskaya, Tatiana. "The Fragments of Theophylact of Bulgaria’s Commentaries as a Part of the Synoptic Nomocanon of Metropolitan Daniel." Stephanos Peer reviewed multilanguage scientific journal 48, no. 4 (July 31, 2021): 92–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.24249/2309-9917-2021-48-4-92-99.

Full text
Abstract:
The paper examines fragments of Theophylact of Bulgaria’s commentaries on the Gospel, which are part of the Synoptic Nomocanon of Metropolitan Daniel, compiled in the 1530s. It is established that the commentaries on the Gospel of Matthew are borrowed from the second, South Slavic in origin, translation of the Commentaries on the Gospel. Fragments of the commentaries on the Gospels of Luke and John are identified with the later versions of the oldest translation of the Commentaries on the Gospel.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Benea, Olimpiu Nicolae. "The Education of the Apostle John Between Discipleship and the Fourth Gospel." Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Theologia Orthodoxa 66, no. 2 (December 30, 2021): 5–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.24193/subbto.2021.2.01.

Full text
Abstract:
"The synoptic gospels present the Apostle John, during the three years of discipleship next to Jesus Christ, in a different way than the Gospel of John. Along with his older brother, James, and the Apostle Peter, he is part of the small, intimate group, which is present at all the important events of the Saviour’s ministry. Jesus chooses to change John into a disciple of “love,” of gentleness, of compassion by accepting him, by unconditional love, and by entrusting him as the son of Mary, the Mother of God. The paradigm of life is shaped in his new relationship, a fact proved by the writing of the fourth Gospel: he does not mention his name, he describes himself as the disciple “whom Jesus loved”, the emphasis on love is twice as great as that of truth and justice. Keywords: Apostle John, Gospels, disciple, education, parents, the paradigm of life. "
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Gospel of John"

1

Blaine, Brad. "Peter in the Gospel of John." Thesis, University of Oxford, 2006. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.431007.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Berberian, Vasken Kevork. "John the Baptist in the gospel tradition." Theological Research Exchange Network (TREN), 1991. http://www.tren.com.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Kim, Dongsoo. "The Church in the Gospel of John." Thesis, University of Cambridge, 1999. https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/251672.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Martinez, G. Theodore. "The purpose of the gospel of John." Theological Research Exchange Network (TREN), 1991. http://www.tren.com.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Farelly, Nicolas. "Inadequate faith in the gospel of John." Theological Research Exchange Network (TREN), 2002. http://www.tren.com.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Chatelion, Counet Patrick. "John, a postmodern Gospel : introduction to deconstructive exegesis applied to the fourth Gospel /." Leiden : Brill, 2000. http://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb390539434.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Broer, Frederick Edward. "The Passion According to the Gospel of John." Thesis, Boston University, 1986. https://hdl.handle.net/2144/30666.

Full text
Abstract:
PLEASE NOTE: Boston University Libraries did not receive an Authorization To Manage form for this thesis or dissertation. It is therefore not openly accessible, though it may be available by request. If you are the author or principal advisor of this work and would like to request open access for it, please contact us at open-help@bu.edu. Thank you.
Thesis (D.M.A.)--Boston University, 1953. PLEASE NOTE: pages 51 and 52 were missing in the physical thesis.
2031-01-02
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Franck, Eskil. "Revelation taught the Paraclete in the Gospel of John /." [Lund] : Malmö, Sweden : CWK Gleerup ; Distributor, Liber, 1985. http://catalog.hathitrust.org/api/volumes/oclc/12771257.html.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Kim, Sehyun. "The Kingship of Jesus in the Gospel of john." Thesis, University of Sheffield, 2010. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.527260.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Brady, Scott M. "The nature of belief in the Gospel of John." Theological Research Exchange Network (TREN), 1986. http://www.tren.com.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Gospel of John"

1

Gospel of john, the gospel of relationship. [Place of publication not identified]: Darton, Longman & Todd Ltd, 2016.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Stallings, Jack Wilson. The Gospel of John. Nashville, Tenn: Randall House Publications, 1989.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

The gospel of John. Liguori, MO: Liguori, 1999.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Michaels, J. Ramsey. The Gospel of John. Grand Rapids, Mich: William B. Eerdmans Pub., 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

The Gospel of John. Grand Rapids, Mich: Eerdmans Pub. Co., 1994.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

J, Harrington Daniel, ed. The Gospel of John. Collegeville, Minn: Liturgical Press, 1998.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

The Gospel of John. London: Epworth, 1990.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

The Gospel of John. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

The gospel of John. Grand Rapids, Mich: Wm. B. Eerdmans Pub., 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

John, the maverick Gospel. Louisville, Ky: Westminster/John Knox Press, 1993.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Gospel of John"

1

Hodges, Graham Russell. "John Jea." In Black Itinerants of the Gospel, 89–164. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-09907-5_3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

McGraw, Ryan M. "The Threats of the Gospel: John Owen on What the Law/Gospel Distinction Is not." In John Owen, 71–109. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60807-5_4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Reynolds, Benjamin E. "John’s Gospel as “Apocalyptic” Gospel." In John among the Apocalypses, 117–43. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198784241.003.0006.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter summarizes the conclusions of the previous two chapters and notes that the Gospel of John contains core elements of the Semeia 14 “master-paradigm” of an apocalypse. Even though the Gospel contains similar elements of form, content, and function, it is not an apocalypse. The manner of revelation (i.e., an otherworldly mediator disclosing heavenly revelation to a human recipient) draws attention to John’s similarity to Jewish apocalypses, but ironically, these form elements contain striking differences. For example, John has visual revelation, yet lacks visions, and John’s otherworldly mediator is also a human, is one with God, and is the content of the revelation. The Gospel has multiple human recipients even though the beloved disciple is the privileged recipient of revelation. Although John does not participate in the genre of apocalypse, it is a gospel that is shaped by the genre of apocalypse. It is a gospel with an apocalyptic mode.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Klink, Edward W. "Gospel of John." In T&T Clark Companion to Atonement. Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9780567677273.ch-050.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

"GOSPEL OF JOHN." In Remains of a Very Ancient Recension of the Four Gospels in Syriac, xlix—lv. Piscataway, NJ, USA: Gorgias Press, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.31826/9781463208349-004.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

"GOSPEL OF JOHN." In Remains of a Very Ancient Recension of the Four Gospels in Syriac, 37–50. Piscataway, NJ, USA: Gorgias Press, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.31826/9781463208349-010.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Reynolds, Benjamin E. "Conclusion." In John among the Apocalypses, 201–10. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198784241.003.0009.

Full text
Abstract:
The Gospel of John is similar to Jewish apocalypses because it is revelatory literature with a narrative framework in which an otherworldly mediator discloses heavenly revelation to a human recipient. The Gospel of John is a revelatory narration of Jesus’s life. Modern genre theory’s use of prototypes to assess participation in a genre allows for a methodologically sound way to compare the Gospel to Jewish apocalypses. Although it is similar in numerous ways, the Gospel does not participate in the genre of apocalypse. Instead, it participates in the gospel genre, yet is qualified by the genre of apocalypse. This understanding of the Gospel as “apocalyptic” Gospel aids in the interpretation of John’s presentation of the Law of Moses and may have been influenced more specifically by its relationship with the Apocalypse of John. This apocalyptic mode explains John’s distinctiveness from the Synoptic Gospels and its affinities with Jewish apocalyptic tradition.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Keith, Chris. "The Competitive Textualization of Johannine and Thomasine Tradition." In The Gospel as Manuscript, 131–60. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199384372.003.0006.

Full text
Abstract:
Chapter 5 presents the presence of competitive textualization in John’s Gospel and the Gospel of Thomas. The chapter argues that the Gospel of John claims superiority to prior Jesus books at John 20:30–31 and 21:24–25, the so-called Johannine “colophons.” Particularly in reference to the knowledge of other Jesus books reflected in John 21:24–25, the chapter also suggests that these texts support arguments that the author of John’s Gospel knew one or more of the Synoptic Gospels. The chapter then highlights how the incipit of the Gospel of Thomas continues attempts to outbid predecessors by portraying its Gospel as dictated directly from Jesus.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Reynolds, Benjamin E. "The “Apocalyptic” Gospel and the Apocalypse of John." In John among the Apocalypses, 167–200. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198784241.003.0008.

Full text
Abstract:
Understanding the Fourth Gospel as “apocalyptic” Gospel raises questions about its relationship with the book of Revelation. Even though many ancient and modern interpreters do not think John and Revelation share the same author, they do share numerous similarities in vocabulary, syntax, and theological themes and are considered to be related in some way. The reception history of Johannine authorship indicates that Revelation has often been understood to have been written before the Gospel. The Gospel has also been described as being received through divine revelation. Within Byzantine iconography, these two traditions come together in the depiction of John dictating the Gospel in the cave of revelation on the island of Patmos as he receives it directly from heaven. The priority of Revelation and the divine reception of the Gospel are possible explanations for the Gospel’s apocalyptic mode.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Lieu, Judith. "How John writes." In The Written Gospel, 171–83. Cambridge University Press, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511614729.010.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Gospel of John"

1

Sorițău, Ilie. "Considerations on the synergistic significance of the evangelistic message in the Gospel of John." In DIALOGO 2020. Dialogo, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.18638/dialogo.2020.7.1.21.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Metlova, Euphrosynia D. "On Some Features of the Functioning of the Structure хохотѣтити + infinitive as the Equivalent of Greek Infinitive Constructions with μέλλωμέλλω in the Oldest Translation of the Explanatory Gospel of Theophylact of Bulgaria (Based on the Explanatory Gospel of John)." In Slavic World: Commonality and Diversity. Institute of Slavic Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.31168/2619-0869.2021.2.15.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography