Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646-1716) / Journal articles

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646-1716).

Journal articles on the topic 'Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646-1716)'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 13 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 17 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646-1716).'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Richter, Arndt, and Weert Meyer. "GOTTFRIED WILHELM LEIBNIZ (1646-1716) Pedigree and Ancestors." KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION 23, no. 2 (1996): 103–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-1996-2-103.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Editorial, Laboratório. "PALAVRA DO EDITOR." Estudos Kantianos [EK] 4, no. 02 (January 25, 2017): 7–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.36311/2318-0501.2016.v4n2.01.p7.

Full text

Abstract:

Tendo em conta as comemorações pelo tricentenário da morte de Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz [nascido em Leipzig a 1o. de julho de 1646; falecido em Hannover, a 14 de novembro de 1716] e a notória importância de sua obra, em campo filosófico como científico, também para Kant, Estudos Kantianos apresenta nas páginas a seguir um fascículo inteiramente dedicado a vários dos muitos aspectos das relações entre ambos esses pensadores.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Wilkinson, Tim. "FINE-TUNING THE MULTIVERSE." Think 12, no. 33 (2013): 89–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1477175612000292.

Full text

Abstract:

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646–1716) was quite a thinker. As a philosopher, he made major contributions to epistemology, logic, the philosophy of religion and metaphysics. He was also an accomplished scientist, historian, and linguist. In mathematics, he built the first (admittedly somewhat unreliable) calculating machine able to perform all four elementary arithmetical operations, and devised the first proper formulation of binary numbers. Although Chinese and Indian scholars had developed several types of rudimentary binary notation centuries earlier, the number system at the heart of every modern computer was put together by Leibniz. As if that were not enough to guarantee his immortality, he also developed calculus independently of Isaac Newton, and it is mostly Leibniz's version that survives in our textbooks, due to his superior notation.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Wellmer, Friedrich-W., and Jürgen Gottschalk. "Die Beschäftigung des Universalgelehrten Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646–1716) mit Geologie und Bergbau." BHM Berg- und Hüttenmännische Monatshefte 160, no. 2 (February 2015): 60–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00501-015-0344-7.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Editorial, Laboratório. "EDITOR’S NOTE." Estudos Kantianos [EK] 4, no. 02 (January 25, 2017): 9–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.36311/2318-0501.2016.v4n2.02.p9.

Full text

Abstract:

On the occasion of the third centenary of Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz’s death (Leipzig, July 1, 1646 – Hannover, November 14, 1716), and considering the well-known importance of his work, both in the philosophical and scientific domain, even for Kant, Estudos Kantianos presents in the following pages a special issue entirely devoted to some of the many features characterizing the relationship between the two philosophers.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Meder, Stephan. "ÚLTIMO GÊNIO UNIVERSAL OU O PRIMEIRO PENSADOR GLOBAL? LEIBNIZ COMO MENTOR DO PLURALISMO POLÍTICO." Revista Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia 24, no. 1 (April 16, 2019): 5. http://dx.doi.org/10.25192/issn.1982-0496.rdfd.v24i11552.

Full text

Abstract:

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646-1716) é o último representante da erudição universal barroca, é o iniciador do Estado “moderno” ou é o primeiro pensador global que prenunciou uma nova era? As discussões sobre Leibniz voltaram a fluir. É geralmente aceito que Leibniz, com os seus trabalhos nos campos da filosofia, teologia, matemática, ciências naturais, história e economia, é uma das personalidades mais importantes da vida intelectual europeia. Mas isso também se aplica aos seus trabalhos no campo do Direito? Os escritos jurídicos, jurídico-filosóficos e políticos de Leibniz são frequentemente percebidos apenas como um complemento às suas contribuições para o progresso na matemática, lógica ou metafísica. Esta análise está errada e precisa de correção. Como mentor da ideia de codificação e do pluralismo político, Leibniz desenvolveu uma eficaz metodologia do Direito. Da nossa perspectiva atual “pós-nacional”, também deve ser interessante saber que ele pensava em termos de grandes ordens transnacionais. Ele é um dos primeiros teóricos de uma federação europeia, sem deixar de demonstrar respeito pelos povos não europeus. O eurocentrismo estava longe dele. Em seus escritos sobre a cultura chinesa, ele chegou a expressar o desejo de que seus representantes viajassem pelo Ocidente para ensinar aos europeus o uso correto da razão.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Fortelius, Mikael, Peter Myrdal, and Indre Zliobaite. "The best of all possible coexistence." Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments 101, no. 1 (January 16, 2021): 259–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12549-020-00468-7.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractThe writings of Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646–1716) provide a window on early evolutionary thinking of a kind interestingly different from the roots of modern evolutionary theory as it emerged in the years following the French Revolution. Here we relate aspects of Leibniz’s thinking to methods of modern palaeoecology and show that, despite a different terminology and a different hierarchic focus, Leibniz emerges as a strikingly modern theoretician, who viewed the living world as dynamic and capable of adaptive change. The coexistence approach of palaeoecological reconstruction, developed by Volker Mosbrugger and collaborators, with its core assumption of harmoniously co-adapted communities with strong historical legacy, represents, in a positive sense, a more Leibnizian view than functionally based and theoretically history-free approaches, such as ecometrics. Recalling Leibniz’s thinking helps to highlight how palaeoecological reconstruction is about much more than reliably establishing the ecological and climatic situation of a given fossil locality. While reliable reconstructions of past conditions are certainly of great value in research, it is arguably the need to think deeply about how the living world really works that keeps palaeoecological reconstruction such a long-running and central aspect of evolutionary science. And while we struggle to understand the coexistence and dynamic interaction of endless levels of living agents of the living world, simultaneously large and small, global and local, the coexistence approach of palaeoecological reconstruction remains both an outstandingly operational method and part of a philosophical tradition reaching back to the very earliest evolutionary thinking.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Eriksson, Kenneth, Don Estep, Peter Hansbo, and Claes Johnson. "Introduction to Adaptive Methods for Differential Equations." Acta Numerica 4 (January 1995): 105–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0962492900002531.

Full text

Abstract:

Knowing thus the Algorithm of this calculus, which I call Differential Calculus, all differential equations can be solved by a common method (Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz, 1646–1719).When, several years ago, I saw for the first time an instrument which, when carried, automatically records the number of steps taken by a pedestrian, it occurred to me at once that the entire arithmetic could be subjected to a similar kind of machinery so that not only addition and subtraction, but also multiplication and division, could be accomplished by a suitably arranged machine easily, promptly and with sure results…. For it is unworthy of excellent men to lose hours like slaves in the labour of calculations, which could safely be left to anyone else if the machine was used…. And now that we may give final praise to the machine, we may say that it will be desirable to all who are engaged in computations which, as is well known, are the managers of financial affairs, the administrators of others estates, merchants, surveyors, navigators, astronomers, and those connected with any of the crafts that use mathematics (Leibniz).

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Nelson, Eric S. "Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Briefe über China (1694-1716): Die Korrespondenz mit Barthélemy Des Bosses S.J. und anderen Mitgliedern des Ordens ed. by Rita Widmaier and Malte-Ludolf Babin." Philosophy East and West 68, no. 4 (2018): 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/pew.2018.0114.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Elden, S. "Leibniz and geography: geologist, paleontologist, biologist, historian, political theorist and geopolitician." Geographica Helvetica 68, no. 2 (July 10, 2013): 81–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gh-68-81-2013.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract. This article discusses the way that the German philosopher and mathematician Gottfried Leibniz (1646–1716) made a number of significant contributions to geography. In outlining his contributions as a geologist, palaeontologist, biologist, historian, political theorist and geopolitician, it challenges the straightforward way he is read in geography. Particular focus is on his Protogaea, the Annales Imperii and the Consilium Aegyptiacum, respectively a pre-history of the earth, a chronology of German nobility in the Middle Ages, and a military-strategic proposal to King Louis XIV. Making use of contemporary debates about ways of reading Leibniz, and drawing on a wide range of his writings, the article indicates just how much remains to be discovered about his work.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Kitagawa, Tomoko L. "Passionate souls: Elisabeth of Bohemia and René Descartes." Mathematical Gazette 105, no. 563 (June 21, 2021): 193–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/mag.2021.46.

Full text

Abstract:

The mathematical investigations of natural phenomena in the seventeenth century led to the inventions of calculus and probability. While we know the works of eminent natural philosophers and mathematicians such as Isaac Newton (1643-1727), we know little about the learned women who made important contributions in the seventeenth century. This article features Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia (1618-1680), whose intellectual ability and curiosity left a unique mark in the history of mathematics. While some of her family members were deeply involved in politics, Elisabeth led an independent, scholarly life, and she was a close correspondent of René Descartes (1596-1650) and Gottfried Leibniz (1646-1716).

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Widmaier, Rita. "La dyadique dans la dernière lettre du Leibniz à Nicolas Remond. Die Dyadik in Leibniz’ letztem Brief an Nicolas Remond1Leibniz beginnt diesen langen Brief an Remond mit der Anrede „Monsieur“ (Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Bibliothek Hannover (im Folgenden: GWLB): Ms XXXVII, 1810, Nr. 1, Bl. 1–16, Bl. 1 r°). Dass er den Brief jedoch als einen Discours sur la Theologie naturelle des Chinois verstanden hat, ist in seinen Briefen an Remond vom 4. November 1715, GP III, 660, vom 17. und 27. Januar 1716, GP III, 665 bzw. 670, und an Des Bosses vom 13. Januar 1716, GP II, 508, wortwörtlich nachzulesen." Studia Leibnitiana 49, no. 2 (2017): 139. http://dx.doi.org/10.25162/sl-2017-0008.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Espinoza Lolas, Ricardo. "DELEUZE: LEIBNIZ… EN TORNO A LOS PLIEGUES." Revista de Filosofia Aurora 21, no. 28 (May 4, 2009): 125. http://dx.doi.org/10.7213/rfa.v21i28.1153.

Full text

Abstract:

El presente artículo explora la conexión entre dos modos de pensamiento que en apariencia se ven muy distintos, estos son, las filosofías del francés Gilles Deleuze (Paris 1925- Paris 1995) y del alemán Gottfried Leibniz (Leipzig 1646- Hannover 1716). En esta conexión de filosofías se repiensa la posibilidad misma del ejercicio filosófico en la actualidad; es posible que la filosofía se mueva radicalmente en el horizonte de lo barroco y es solamente desde allí donde se da la posibilidad y agenciamiento de la filosofía como disciplina y quehacer humano, en tanto creadora de conceptos, esto es, territorios desde los cuales podemos levantar nuestras formas de vida. Y para poder entender la filosofía como barroca y creadora de conceptos es necesario analizar desde el pensamiento de Deleuze dos categorías fundamentales: pliegue y concepto. Pues desde ellas podemos entender cómo el filósofo francés se siente un fiel heredero de lo más propia de la historia de la filosofía, esto es, la filosofía encarnada por Leibniz. Y desde esta filosofía alemana se dan las herramientas para seguir creando modos nuevos e intensos de estar en la realidad creativamente.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Friedrich, Markus. "Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Briefe über China (1694–1716). Die Korrespondenz mit Barthélemy des Bosses S.J. und anderen Mitgliedern des Ordens. Hrsg. u. komm. v. Rita Widmaier u. Malte-Ludolf Babin. Textauswahl u. Einleitung v. Rita Widmaier. Textherstellung u. Übersetzung v. Malte-Ludolf Babin. (Philosophische Bibliothek, Bd. 693.) Hamburg, Meiner 2017." Historische Zeitschrift 308, no. 2 (April 5, 2019): 511–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hzhz-2019-1141.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

von Collani, Claudia. "Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Briefe über China (1694–1716): Die Korrespondenz mit Barthélemy Des Bosses S.J. und anderen Mitgliedern des Ordens. Herausgegeben und kommentiert von Rita Widmaier und Malte-Ludolf Babin. Textauswahl und Einleitung von Rita Widmaier, Textherstellung und Übersetzung von Malte-Ludolf Babin. Französisch/Lateinisch/Italienisch – Deutsch. Philosophische Bibliothek, 693. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 2017. clxxi, 660 S. Bibliographie, Index. € 148 (HB). ISBN 978-3-7873-3102-4." Monumenta Serica 67, no. 1 (January 2, 2019): 268–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02549948.2019.1603470.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. "The Monadology. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646-1716)." NeuroQuantology 4, no. 3 (September 10, 2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.14704/nq.2006.4.3.107.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Nilsen, Fredrik. "Anne Conway og sinn-kropp-problemet." Septentrio Conference Series, no. 3 (November 11, 2019). http://dx.doi.org/10.7557/5.5039.

Full text

Abstract:

I The principles of the most ancient and modern philosophy tar Anne Conway (1631-1679) et oppgjør med teoriene til flere av sine samtidige mannlige kolleger, i fremste rekke Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679), René Descartes (1596-1650) og Baruch de Spinoza (1632-1677). En viktig del av denne kritikken handler om at hun mener at ingen av dem gir en fullgod forklaring på relasjonen mellom sjel og legeme. For Hobbes er alt i verden, sjelen inkludert, en del av den materielle og determinerte verden og således finnes det ikke noe mulighet for at mennesket kan ha en sjel som er fri. Hos Descartes finner vi den dualistiske læren om at mennesket består av to substanser, sjel og legeme, og mens legemet har utstrekning og således er ufritt, mangler sjelen utstrekning og kan dermed betraktes som fri. Spinoza hevder på sin side at sjel og legeme ikke er to substanser, men snarere to væremåter under den eneste substans som finnes, Gud, noe som gjør at sjel og legeme befinner seg på samme nivå og kan virke sammen. Mot disse teoriene hevder Conway, inspirert av sin kollega og venn Henry More (1614-1687), at det det ikke er mulig å trekke et definitivt skille mellom sjel og legeme. Det finnes ikke legemer som er uten sjel eller ånd, og det finnes heller ikke, riktignok med unntak av Gud, sjeler eller ånder som er uten legeme. Dermed er det verken slik Hobbes hevder, da ikke alt, men snarere ingenting, er rent materielt, ei heller slik Descartes hevder, da det ikke finnes et dualistisk skille mellom sjel og legeme, og endelig heller ikke slik Spinoza hevder, da det på nyplatonsk vis finnes et hierarki i naturen ut fra hvor langt de ulike «tingene» er fra Gud, og hvor sjelen innrømmes forrang framfor legemet. Dessuten inspirerte Conway Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz (1646-1716) til å utvikle monadebegrepet, et begrep som er helt vesentlig i Leibniz sin forståelse av samvirket mellom sjel og legeme som preetablert harmoni. Conway må slik sies å delta aktivt i en av sin samtids mest intense filosofiske debatter og fortjener en langt mer fremskutt plass i filosofiens historie enn den ettertiden har tilkjent henne. Artikkelen min tematiserer ikke feminisme og kjønn, men den er en del av en satsning som forskningsgruppen i feministisk filosofi (FemPhil) ved Universitetet i Tromsø – Norges Arktiske Universitet har igangsatt hvor målet er å synliggjøre kvinners bidrag til filosofiens historie og således bidra til å revidere den gjengse forståelsen av filosofifaget som et fag av og for menn. Prosjektet har verdi i seg selv, da det bidrar til bedre balanse mellom mannlige og kvinnelige tenkere i filosofiens historie, men vi håper også at det på sikt vil bidra positivt til rekrutteringen av kvinner, det være seg både ansatte og studenter, til filosofifaget.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!