Academic literature on the topic 'Government and Binding theory'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Government and Binding theory.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Government and Binding theory"
Lasnik, Howard, and Terje Lohndal. "Government–binding/principles and parameters theory." Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 1, no. 1 (December 30, 2009): 40–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcs.35.
Full textWhaley, Lindsay J., and Gert Webelhuth. "Government and Binding Theory and the Minimalist Program." Language 73, no. 4 (December 1997): 856. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/417336.
Full textAMANO, MASACHIYO. "ON THE GOVERNMENT-BINDING THEORY AND DERIVED NOMINALS." ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 3 (1986): 1–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.9793/elsj1984.3.1.
Full textLeonard, Laurence B., and Diane Frome Loeb. "Government-Binding Theory and Some of Its Applications." Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 31, no. 4 (December 1988): 515–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3104.515.
Full textMcHale, M. L., and S. H. Myaeng. "Integration of conceptual graphs and government-binding theory." Knowledge-Based Systems 5, no. 3 (September 1992): 213–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0950-7051(92)90033-c.
Full textRAGER, JOHN, and GEORGE BERG. "A Connectionist Model of Motion and Government in Chomsky's Government-binding Theory." Connection Science 2, no. 1-2 (January 1990): 35–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540099008915661.
Full textOwen, Marion, and Noam Chomsky. "Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding." Modern Language Review 81, no. 3 (July 1986): 687. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3729191.
Full textHarsono, Y. M. "Chomsky's Universal Grammar: A Case of Its Concepts of Government/Binding Theory." TEFLIN Journal - A publication on the teaching and learning of English 12, no. 2 (September 3, 2015): 210. http://dx.doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v12i2/210-222.
Full textLópez-Astorga, Miguel. "Possible roles for semantics and syntax in a government-binding structure." Prometeica - Revista de Filosofía y Ciencias, no. 19 (August 18, 2019): 72–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.34024/prometeica.2019.19.6823.
Full textSinghSehgal, Manpreet, Twinkle Sehgal, and Manjeet Singh. "Ontological Knowledge-base for English Syntactic Grammar using Government and Binding Theory." International Journal of Computer Applications 51, no. 16 (August 30, 2012): 43–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.5120/8129-1866.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Government and Binding theory"
Macias, Benjamin. "An incremental parser for government-binding theory." Thesis, University of Cambridge, 1991. https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/251511.
Full textVinger, Gift. "THE STATUS OF THE PROJECTION PRINCIPLE IN GOVERNMENT-BINDING THEORY." Journal for New Generation Sciences, Vol 6, Issue 2: Central University of Technology, Free State, Bloemfontein, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/11462/509.
Full textThe role of the Projection Principle within Chomsky's Government-Binding (GB) Theory is to preserve the subcategorisation properties of lexical items at all levels of syntactic representation, viz. D-structure, S-structure, and Lexical Form. Arguments have been made that the Projection Principle is a new concept that is simply an extension of theTransformational Component (XFM) and Emonds' Structure-Preserving Constraint (SPC), and that it does not deserve the high status it has been accorded in GB theory. This paper provides evidence, based on sentences involving movement operations, that the Projection Principle is innovative and that it convincingly addresses what theXFMandSPChave failed to address.
Nakamura, Masanori 1966. "Move a, scope, and relativized minimality." Thesis, McGill University, 1992. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=56651.
Full textGamon, Michael. "The derivational formation of chain-links : minimalism and binding theory /." Thesis, Connect to this title online; UW restricted, 1996. http://hdl.handle.net/1773/8416.
Full textKim, Kwang-Sup. "A theta binding approach to quantification in English." [Seoul, Korea] : Dept. of English, Graduate School, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, 1990. http://catalog.hathitrust.org/api/volumes/oclc/26153714.html.
Full textMotaung, Patric Serame. "Control in infinitives in Sesotho." University of the Western Cape, 1991. http://hdl.handle.net/11394/8202.
Full textThe purpose of this study is to investigate how subject PRO of the infinitive in Sesotho is assigned an antecedent The general framework which is assumed is the Government Binding theory of generative grammar, in particular one of its subtheories, namely the Control theory which is concerned with the assignment of an antecedent to the subject PRO in the infinitive. A survey of the work done by various linguists on the Infinitive in Bantu languages shows that much has been written on the properties of the infinitive. In the Nguni languages, especially in Xhosa, considerable research has been done to establish the syntactic nature of the infinitive in the various constructions that it may occur. The Infinitive in Sesotho has, however, not been studied extensively. The central issue of this study relates to establishing the antecedent of the subject PRO of the infinitive in the various constructions in which it may appear. It is demonstrated that in some instances it is possible for two different NP arguments in a sentence to serve as a possible antecedent of the empty category PRO. This examination of control of the subject PRO in the infinitive in Sesotho has revealed the following: The subject PRO in the infinitive must have antecedent. In such cases the empty category PRO which is obligatory control is considered to behave like an anaphor, because as an empty of the clausal complement it must take its referential index from either the subject or object argument of the matrix sentence. This implies that the empty category PRO has no capacity for independent reference. 2. The subject PRO in the infinitive may have an In such cases the empty category PRO which is subject to non-obligatory control is considered to behave like a pronoun, because the empty category PRO may either refer to individuals independently or co-refer to individuals already named on a given sentence. Finally the subject PRO in the infinitive can at times have no antecedent at all In such cases the empty category PRO is subject to arbitrary control, because its antecedent may be implicit This has been established in the following instances: 3.1 There are cases where the infinitive is a complement of a Verb or a Copulative with the subject position occupied by an empty existential pronominal which is associated with the existential morpheme Ho. This pronominal is an empty category just like PRO, but is in a non-argument position, for it lacks a thetha-role. This is attributed to the fact that the existential pronominal associated with Ho, which signifies "it" or "there" is a dummy element and has therefore no semantic role. Therefore the antecedent of the subject PRO in the infinitive can be "anyone in general". The interpretation thereof is known as arbitrary control. It has also been established that, the Nominal infinitive, which has in Sesotho, like all other nominals, a class prefix which is morphologically marked with a prefix Ho, is subject to arbitrary control (see 3 above). This is attributed to the fact that its subject NP-argument has a non-referential expression which is thus ungoverned, because it has no agreement (-AGR) and can therefore not be assigned Case.
Tellier, Christine. "Universal licensing : implications for parasitic gap constructions." Thesis, McGill University, 1988. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=75902.
Full textThis allows for a more constrained model of grammar, under which a number of facts follow in a principled way; this is the case particularly with respect to constructions involving null operators. Thus, from the D- and S-Structure conditions on null operator licensing, we derive the cross-linguistic as well as the language-internal distribution of resumptive pronouns. Furthermore, some of the well-known, but so far stipulated, constraints on parasitic gap (PG) constructions are shown to follow from general principles: we explain for instance the fact that PGs must be sanctioned at S-Structure, as well as the inability of adjunct movement to license PGs.
The consequences of Universal Licensing on the distribution of PGs are examined with particular reference to adnominal PGs in French genitival relatives. It is shown that the properties displayed by these little-studied ("double dont") constructions, in conjunction with the Universal Licensing Principle, shed significant light on a number of issues, among which the thematic structure of nominals, and the nature of the locality constraints on null operator identification.
Fox, Daniel. "Scrambling and extraction constraints in Dari : GB and RRG analyses /." Amherst, Mass. : [s.n.], 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/10009/301.
Full textSalome, Margaret. "On the interaction between aspect and arbitrary null objects : evidence from Spanish /." Thesis, Connect to this title online; UW restricted, 1996. http://hdl.handle.net/1773/8427.
Full textYamada, Masaru. "A study of the Japanese reflexive pronouns zibun and zibun-zisin." Morgantown, W. Va. : [West Virginia University Libraries], 1999. http://etd.wvu.edu/templates/showETD.cfm?recnum=400.
Full textTitle from document title page. Document formatted into pages; contains v, 54 p. : ill. Vita. Includes abstract. Includes bibliographical references (p. 51-53).
Books on the topic "Government and Binding theory"
Haegeman, Liliane M. V. Introduction to government and binding theory. Oxford, UK: B. Blackwell, 1991.
Find full textIntroduction to government and binding theory. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: B. Blackwell, 1994.
Find full textSadler, Louisa. Welsh syntax: A government-binding approach. London: Croom Helm, 1988.
Find full textSadler, Louisa. Welsh syntax: A government-binding approach. London: Croom Helm, 1988.
Find full textHe, Yuanjian. An introduction to government-binding theory in Chinese syntax. Lewiston: E. Mellen Press, 1996.
Find full textCowper, Elizabeth A. An introduction to syntactic theory: The government-binding approach. [Toronto: University of Toronto Press], 1986.
Find full textChomsky, Noam. Lectures on government and binding: The Pisa lectures. 5th ed. Dordrecht: Foris, 1988.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Government and Binding theory"
Klein, Wolfgang. "Government-binding." In Cross Currents in Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory, 169. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/lald.2.11kle.
Full textDe Geest, Wim, and Dany Jaspers. "1. Government and Binding Theory." In Linguistic Theory and Grammatical Description, 23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/cilt.75.03deg.
Full textPerez, Carolyn Harford. "14. The Shona Passive and Government-Binding Theory." In Publications in African Languages and Linguistics, edited by Gerrit J. Dimmendahl, 179–90. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110883350-015.
Full textRager, John, and George Berg. "A Connectionist Model of Motion and Government on Chomsky’s Government-binding Theory." In Connectionist Natural Language Processing, 28–45. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2624-3_2.
Full textLasnik, Howard. "On a Lexical Parameter in the Government-Binding Theory." In Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 163–71. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-6859-3_7.
Full textBienemann, Alexander, Klaus-Dieter Schewe, and Bernhard Thalheim. "Towards a Theory of Genericity Based on Government and Binding." In Conceptual Modeling - ER 2006, 311–24. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11901181_24.
Full textVan Riemsdijk, Henk. "Crossover Between Acquisition Research and Government and Binding Theory: Comments on the Paper by Tom Roeper." In Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, 311–18. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4548-7_9.
Full textBarbosa, Fernando de Holanda. "Government Budget Constraint." In Macroeconomic Theory, 307–38. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92132-7_10.
Full textPoole, Geoffrey. "Introduction to Binding Theory." In Syntactic Theory, 119–49. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-34531-7_5.
Full textBonnafous-Boucher, Maria. "From Government to Governance." In Stakeholder Theory, 1–23. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230524224_1.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Government and Binding theory"
Kuhns, Robert J. "Automatic indexing and Government-Binding Theory." In the 13th conference. Morristown, NJ, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/991146.991231.
Full textKuhns, Robert J. "A PARLOG implementation of Government-Binding Theory." In the 13th conference. Morristown, NJ, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/991146.991230.
Full textKuhns, Robert J. "A PROLOG implementation of Government-Binding Theory." In the 11th coference. Morristown, NJ, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/991365.991524.
Full textCorrea, Nelson. "An attribute-grammar implementation of Government-binding theory." In the 25th annual meeting. Morristown, NJ, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/981175.981182.
Full textChen, Hsin-Hsi, I. Peng Lin, and Chien-Ping Wu. "A new design of prolog-based bottom-up parsing system with Government-Binding theory." In the 12th conference. Morristown, NJ, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/991635.991659.
Full textSugawara, Shin-etsu, and Hiroshi Kimura. "The Role of Local Governments in the Japanese Nuclear Governance: Case Analysis of “Safety Agreements” in Siting Areas." In 17th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering. ASMEDC, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/icone17-75470.
Full textStoyanova, Antoaneta. "ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS WHEN BUILDING ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS." In THE LAW AND THE BUSINESS IN THE CONTEMPORARY SOCIETY 2020. University publishing house "Science and Economics", University of Economics - Varna, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.36997/lbcs2020.85.
Full textCorrea, Nelson. "A binding rule for Government-binding parsing." In the 12th conference. Morristown, NJ, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/991635.991661.
Full textUnderwood, Nicholas, Paul Nevitt, Andrew Howarth, and Nicholas Barron. "Overview of UK Policy and Research Landscape Relevant to Deploying Advanced Nuclear Technologies in the UK." In ASME 2020 Pressure Vessels & Piping Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/pvp2020-21790.
Full textKarásek, Vítězslav, and Pavel Zemánek. "Optical binding in theory." In Congress on Optics and Optoelectronics, edited by Krzysztof M. Abramski, Antonio Lapucci, and Edward F. Plinski. SPIE, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.623052.
Full textReports on the topic "Government and Binding theory"
Bizer, David, and Steven Durlauf. Testing the Positive Theory of Government Finance. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, May 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w3349.
Full textLanghoff, P. W., J. Boatz, and J. Sheehy. Spectral Theory of Physical and Chemical Binding: Aspects of Computational Implementation. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, February 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada397877.
Full textSatterwhite, Elizabeth. Ribozyme/Duplex Binding Interactions as a Thermodynamic Basis for Chemical Game Theory. Portland State University Library, January 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.15760/honors.311.
Full textChassang, Sylvain, Lucia Del Carpio, and Samuel Kapon. Making the Most of Limited Government Capacity: Theory and Experiment. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, October 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w28042.
Full textLevin, Jonathan, and Steven Tadelis. Contracting for Government Services: Theory and Evidence from U.S. Cities. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, August 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w13350.
Full textKelly, Luke. Characteristics of Global Health Diplomacy. Institute of Development Studies (IDS), June 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.19088/k4d.2021.09.
Full textDrazen, Allan, and Nuno Limão. Government Gains from Self-Restraint: A Bargaining Theory of Inefficient Redistribution. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, March 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w10375.
Full textHart, Oliver, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny. The Proper Scope of Government: Theory and an Application to Prisons. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, September 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w5744.
Full textHoltz-Eakin, Douglas, Harvey Rosen, and Schuyler Tilly. Intertemporal Analysis of State and Local Government Spending: Theory ad Tests. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, January 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w4261.
Full textCoate, Stephen, and Brian Knight. Government Form and Public Spending: Theory and Evidence from U.S. Municipalities. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, April 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w14857.
Full text