Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Grant peer review / Journal articles

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Grant peer review.

Journal articles on the topic 'Grant peer review'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 26 July 2025

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Grant peer review.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Lindquist, RD, MF Tracy, and D. Treat-Jacobson. "Peer review of nursing research proposals." American Journal of Critical Care 4, no. 1 (1995): 59–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.4037/ajcc1995.4.1.59.

Full text

Abstract:

The grant review process that operationalizes peer review for the critique, scoring, approval, and selection of research grants for funding may intimidate a novice reviewer. This article describes the peer review panel and process of grant review, specifies the role and responsibilities of the reviewer in the review session, and presents considerations for the evaluation of proposals and the preparation of a written critique. A sample critique is provided.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Fliesler, S. J. "Rethinking Grant Peer Review." Science 275, no. 5305 (1997): 1399–0. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5305.1399.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Mutz, Rüdiger, Lutz Bornmann, and Hans-Dieter Daniel. "Does Gender Matter in Grant Peer Review?" Zeitschrift für Psychologie 220, no. 2 (2012): 121–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000103.

Full text

Abstract:

One of the most frequently voiced criticisms of the peer review process is gender bias. In this study we evaluated the grant peer review process (external reviewers’ ratings, and board of trustees’ final decision: approval or no approval for funding) at the Austrian Science Fund with respect to gender. The data consisted of 8,496 research proposals (census) across all disciplines from 1999 to 2009, which were rated on a scale from 1 to 100 (poor to excellent) by 18,357 external reviewers in 23,977 reviews. In line with the current state of research, we found that the final decision was not ass

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Fielder, Alistair, and Hannah Vinyard. "Peer review of grant applications." Lancet 352, no. 9133 (1998): 1063. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(98)00024-5.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Waldron, HA. "Peer review and grant applications." Lancet 349, no. 9044 (1997): 63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(05)62205-2.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Grewal, Nanu. "Peer review and grant applications." Lancet 349, no. 9044 (1997): 63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(05)62206-4.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Foveaux, Bernard A. "Peer review and grant applications." Lancet 349, no. 9044 (1997): 63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(05)62207-6.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Swift, Michael. "Peer review of grant applications." Lancet 352, no. 9133 (1998): 1063–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(05)60101-8.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Moseley, Merrick J. "Peer review of grant applications." Lancet 352, no. 9133 (1998): 1064. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(05)60102-x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Sekikawa, Akira, Deborah J. Aaron, Benjamin Acosta, Rimei Nishimura, and Ronald E. LaPorte. "Peer review of grant applications." Lancet 352, no. 9133 (1998): 1064. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(05)60103-1.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Crotty, Shane, Catherine Blish, Ken Cadwell, et al. "Reinvigorating NIH Grant Peer Review." Immunity 52, no. 1 (2020): 1–3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2019.12.016.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Ardern, Clare L., Nadia Martino, Sammy Nag, et al. "Three years of quality assurance data assessing the performance of over 4000 grant peer review contributions to the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Project Grant Competition." FACETS 8 (January 1, 2023): 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/facets-2022-0175.

Full text

Abstract:

The Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) commenced a Quality Assurance Program in 2019 to monitor the quality of peer review in its Project Grant Competition Peer Review Committees. Our primary aim was to describe the performance of CIHR grant peer reviewers, based on the assessments made by CIHR peer review leaders during the first 3 years of the Research Quality Assurance Program. All Peer Review Committee Chairs and (or) Scientific Officers who led peer review for CIHR in 2019, 2020, and 2021 completed Reviewer Quality Feedback forms immediately following Peer Review Committee meet

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Sims Gould, Joanie, Anne M. Lasinsky, Adrian Mota, Karim M. Khan, and Clare L. Ardern. "Threats to grant peer review: a qualitative study." BMJ Open 15, no. 2 (2025): e091666. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091666.

Full text

Abstract:

Background and objectivesPeer review is ubiquitous in evaluating scientific research. While peer review of manuscripts submitted to journals has been widely studied, there has been relatively less attention paid to peer review of grant applications (despite how crucial peer review is to researchers having the means and capacity to conduct research). There is spirited debate in academic community forums (including on social media) about the perceived benefits and limitations of grant peer review. The aim of our study was to understand the experiences and challenges faced by grant peer reviewers

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Marchant, Mary A. "The Keys to Preparing Successful Research Grant Proposals." Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 33, no. 3 (2001): 605–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1074070800021040.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractThis article seeks to demystify the competitive grant recommendation process of scientific peer review panels. The National Research Initiative Competitive Grants Program (NRICGP) administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture-Cooperative State Research, Extension, and Education Service (USDA-CSREES) serves as the focus of this article. This article provides a brief background on the NRICGP and discusses the application process, the scientific peer review process, guidelines for grant writing, and ways to interpret reviewer comments if a proposal is not funded. The essentials of go

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Aleksunes, Lauren, Yasheca Ebanks, and Suzie Chen. "11554 Getting the Grant: Assessment of a Monthly Grant Writing Group for Junior Investigators." Journal of Clinical and Translational Science 5, s1 (2021): 60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.557.

Full text

Abstract:

ABSTRACT IMPACT: NJ ACTS provides mentored coaching in NIH grant writing for early stage investigators. OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Launching an independent academic careers requires the ability to effectively communicate the purpose and impact of biomedical research in order to obtain extramural funding. We sought to develop and evaluate an interactive grant writing group of junior faculty and senior postdoctoral fellows mentored by trained coaches. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Participants meet monthly for 1 hour to peer review Specific Aims pages for grant applications to NIH and private foundations. Se

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Gupta, Vishnu Kumar. "Quality Control through Peer Review Process in Scholarly Communication: Review of Related Literature." IRA-International Journal of Management & Social Sciences (ISSN 2455-2267) 8, no. 3 (2017): 248. http://dx.doi.org/10.21013/jmss.v8.n3.p3.

Full text

Abstract:

<p>This review of related literature on the theme of peer review process in scholarly communication explains the status of research on periodicals, grant peer review and fellowships. The paper highlights the quality related issues of the scholarly communication and peer review process. Peer reviewers are invited to grant applications or assess fellowship or review manuscript in a peer review process undertake the responsibility for confirming top-level quality and standards in their concerned subject fields. <em></em></p>

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Conix, Stijn, Andreas De Block, and Krist Vaesen. "Grant writing and grant peer review as questionable research practices." F1000Research 10 (November 8, 2021): 1126. http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.73893.1.

Full text

Abstract:

A large part of governmental research funding is currently distributed through the peer review of project proposals. In this paper, we argue that such funding systems incentivize and even force researchers to violate five moral values, each of which is central to commonly used scientific codes of conduct. Our argument complements existing epistemic arguments against peer-review project funding systems and, accordingly, strengthens the mounting calls for reform of these systems.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Conix, Stijn, Andreas De Block, and Krist Vaesen. "Grant writing and grant peer review as questionable research practices." F1000Research 10 (December 24, 2021): 1126. http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.73893.2.

Full text

Abstract:

A large part of governmental research funding is currently distributed through the peer review of project proposals. In this paper, we argue that such funding systems incentivize and even force researchers to violate five moral values, each of which is central to commonly used scientific codes of conduct. Our argument complements existing epistemic arguments against peer-review project funding systems and, accordingly, strengthens the mounting calls for reform of these systems.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Gallo, Stephen A. "The Science of Peer Review: Grant Review Feedback." BioScience 71, no. 5 (2021): 431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biab051.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Ebanks, Yasheca, and Lauren Aleksunes. "109 Pursuit of Fellowship Funding Through Peer Review Writing Groups." Journal of Clinical and Translational Science 7, s1 (2023): 32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.192.

Full text

Abstract:

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Pursuit of independent funding by predoctoral and postdoctoral fellows requires navigating the intricate steps in preparing extramural grant applications. The Workforce Development Core of the NJ Alliance for Clinical and Translational Science (NJ ACTS) sought to evaluate an interactive grant writing group of fellows mentored by a trained coach. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Participants meet weekly for 3 months to develop components of a fellowship application for submission to NIH and private foundations. Sessions were moderated by a senior faculty member trained as a coach by

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Avin, Shahar. "Why we still need grant peer review." EMBO reports 15, no. 5 (2014): 465–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/embr.201438671.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Forsdyke, Donald R. "Bicameral Grant Review: An Alternative to Conventional Peer Review." FASEB Journal 5, no. 9 (1991): 2313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.5.9.1860622.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Burns, Karen EA, Elaine Caon, and Peter M. Dodek. "Evaluation of an Internal Review Process for Grants And Manuscripts in the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group." Canadian Respiratory Journal 21, no. 5 (2014): 283–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/595320.

Full text

Abstract:

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: All grants and manuscripts bearing the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group name are submitted for internal peer review before submission. The authors sought to formally evaluate authors’ and reviewers’ perceptions of this process.METHODS: The authors developed, tested and administered two electronic nine-item questionnaires for authors and two electronic 13-item questionnaires for reviewers. Likert scale, multiple choice and free-text responses were used.RESULTS: Twenty-one of 29 (72%) grant authors and 16 of 22 (73%) manuscript authors responded. Most author responde

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Hesselberg, Jan-Ole, Pål Ulleberg, Øystein Sørensen, Knut Inge Fostervold, Sigrid Hegna Ingvaldsen, and Ida Svege. "Registered report protocol: Factors associated with inter-rater agreement in grant peer review." PLOS One 20, no. 5 (2025): e0322696. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322696.

Full text

Abstract:

Grant peer review processes are pivotal in allocating substantial research funding, yet concerns about their reliability persist, primarily due to low inter-rater agreement. This study aims to examine factors associated with agreement among peer reviewers in grant evaluations, leveraging data from 134,991 reviews across four Norwegian research funders. Using a cross-classified linear regression model, we will explore the relationship between inter-rater agreement and multiple factors, including reviewer similarity, experience, expertise, research area, application characteristics, review depth

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Pier, Elizabeth L., Markus Brauer, Amarette Filut, et al. "Low agreement among reviewers evaluating the same NIH grant applications." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, no. 12 (2018): 2952–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1714379115.

Full text

Abstract:

Obtaining grant funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is increasingly competitive, as funding success rates have declined over the past decade. To allocate relatively scarce funds, scientific peer reviewers must differentiate the very best applications from comparatively weaker ones. Despite the importance of this determination, little research has explored how reviewers assign ratings to the applications they review and whether there is consistency in the reviewers’ evaluation of the same application. Replicating all aspects of the NIH peer-review process, we examined 43 indivi

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Doran, Michael, Adrian Barnett, Joan Leach, William Lott, Katie Page, and Will Grant. "Can video improve grant review quality and lead to more reliable ranking?" Research Ideas and Outcomes 3 (February 1, 2017): e11931. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e11931.

Full text

Abstract:

Multimedia video is rapidly becoming mainstream, and many studies indicate that it is a more effective communication medium than text. In this project we AIM to test if videos can be used, in place of text-based grant proposals, to improve communication and increase the reliability of grant ranking. We will test if video improves reviewer comprehension (AIM 1), if external reviewer grant scores are more consistent with video (AIM 2), and if mock Australian Research Council (ARC) panels award more consistent scores when grants are presented as videos (AIM 3). This will be the first study to eva

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Gallo, Stephen A., Joanne H. Sullivan, and DaJoie R. Croslan. "Scientists from Minority-Serving Institutions and Their Participation in Grant Peer Review." BioScience 72, no. 3 (2022): 289–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biab130.

Full text

Abstract:

ABSTRACT Funding disparities currently exist across racial groups for grant applicants and between minority-serving institutions (MSIs) and traditionally White institutions (TWIs), with implicit bias in grant review a likely source of these differences. A survey examining grant review participation was disseminated to thousands of MSI-based scientists, and their responses were compared with those in a previous study of predominantly TWI-based scientists. Despite similar levels of grant submission, only 45% of the MSI-based scientists had recently participated in grant review, which is much low

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Femia, Elia, Dana Plude, and George W. Rebok. "THE NUTS AND BOLTS OF NIH PEER REVIEW: THE CENTER FOR SCIENTIFIC REVIEW." Innovation in Aging 3, Supplement_1 (2019): S210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz038.763.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract The National Institutes of Health is the largest public funder of biomedical and bio-behavioral research in the United States. The mission is to enhance health, lengthen life, and reduce illness and disability. To achieve this mission, the NIH provides support for cutting-edge research and technology development in a variety of fields, ranging from translation of innovative ideas in technology to basic science on major health challenges and disease. There are many types of research and training opportunities and technology development programs that are supported by the NIH across the

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Schwartz, David A., J. Patrick Mastin, and Michael Martin. "Improving Grant Application Peer Review for the NIEHS." Environmental Health Perspectives 114, no. 5 (2006): A270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.114-a270.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Bornmann, Lutz, Rüdiger Mutz, and Hans-Dieter Daniel. "Latent Markov modeling applied to grant peer review." Journal of Informetrics 2, no. 3 (2008): 217–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2008.05.003.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Gallo, Stephen, Lisa Thompson, Karen Schmaling, and Scott Glisson. "Risk evaluation in peer review of grant applications." Environment Systems and Decisions 38, no. 2 (2018): 216–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10669-018-9677-6.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Bonetta, Laura. "Enhancing NIH Grant Peer Review: A Broader Perspective." Cell 135, no. 2 (2008): 201–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.051.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Bollen, Johan, David Crandall, Damion Junk, Ying Ding, and Katy Börner. "Response: “Why we still need grant peer review”." EMBO reports 15, no. 5 (2014): 467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/embr.201438792.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Dumanis, Sonya B., Lauren Ullrich, Patricia M. Washington, and Patrick A. Forcelli. "It's Money! Real-World Grant Experience through a Student-Run, Peer-Reviewed Program." CBE—Life Sciences Education 12, no. 3 (2013): 419–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-05-0058.

Full text

Abstract:

Grantsmanship is an integral component of surviving and thriving in academic science, especially in the current funding climate. Therefore, any additional opportunities to write, read, and review grants during graduate school may have lasting benefits on one's career. We present here our experience with a small, student-run grant program at Georgetown University Medical Center. Founded in 2010, this program has several goals: 1) to give graduate students an opportunity to conduct small, independent research projects; 2) to encourage graduate students to write grants early and often; and 3) to

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Severin, Anna, Joao Martins, Rachel Heyard, François Delavy, Anne Jorstad, and Matthias Egger. "Gender and other potential biases in peer review: cross-sectional analysis of 38 250 external peer review reports." BMJ Open 10, no. 8 (2020): e035058. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035058.

Full text

Abstract:

ObjectivesTo examine whether the gender of applicants and peer reviewers and other factors influence peer review of grant proposals submitted to a national funding agency.SettingSwiss National Science Foundation (SNSF).DesignCross-sectional analysis of peer review reports submitted from 2009 to 2016 using linear mixed effects regression models adjusted for research topic, applicant’s age, nationality, affiliation and calendar period.ParticipantsExternal peer reviewers.Primary outcome measureOverall score on a scale from 1 (worst) to 6 (best).ResultsAnalyses included 38 250 reports on 12 294 gr

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Frampton, Geoff, Jonathan Shepherd, Karen Pickett, and Jeremy Wyatt. "PP021 Peer Review Innovations For Grant Applications: Efficient And Effective?" International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 33, S1 (2017): 78–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0266462317002124.

Full text

Abstract:

INTRODUCTION:Peer review of grant applications is employed routinely by health research funding bodies to determine which research proposals should be funded. Peer review faces a number of criticisms, however, especially that it is time consuming, financially expensive, and may not select the best proposals. Various modifications to peer review have been examined in research studies but these have not been systematically reviewed to guide Health Technology Assessment (HTA) funding agencies.METHODS:We developed a systematic map based on a logic model to summarize the characteristics of empirica

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Brainard, Jeffrey. "Should grant applicants judge competitors’ proposals?" Science 389, no. 6756 (2025): 120. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aea4273.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Schmaling, Karen B., and Stephen A. Gallo. "An experimental study of simulated grant peer review: Gender differences and psychometric characteristics of proposal scores." PLOS ONE 19, no. 12 (2024): e0315567. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315567.

Full text

Abstract:

Peer review is a decisive factor in selecting research grant proposals for funding. The usefulness of peer review depends in part on the agreement of multiple reviewers’ judgments of the same proposal, and on each reviewer’s consistency in judging proposals. Peer reviewers are also instructed to disregard characteristics that are not among the evaluation criteria. However, for example, the gender identity—of the investigator or reviewer—may be associated with differing evaluations. This experiment sought to characterize the psychometric properties of peer review among 605 experienced peer revi

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Ortenberg, Elia, Karen Roberto, Dana Plude, Janetta Lun, and Helena Gabor. "DEMYSTIFYING NIH PEER REVIEW: YOUR APPLICATION FROM SUBMISSION TO SCORE." Innovation in Aging 6, Supplement_1 (2022): 30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igac059.111.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract What happens to applications after they are submitted to the National Institutes of Health, and how can you better prepare for the process of peer review? The Center for Scientific Review (CSR) works closely with the 24 funding institutes and centers at the National Institutes of Health that provide funding support for projects of high scientific merit and high potential impact. CSR conducts the first level of review for the majority of grant applications submitted to the NIH, which includes 90% of R01s, 85% of Fellowships, and 95% of Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) applicat

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Blair, Benjie G., George R. Cline, and William R. Bowen. "NSF-Style Peer Review for Teaching Undergraduate Grant-Writing." American Biology Teacher 69, no. 1 (2007): 34–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4452079.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Blair, Benjie G., George R. Cline, and William R. Bowen. "NSF-Style Peer Review for Teaching Undergraduate Grant-Writing." American Biology Teacher 69, no. 1 (2007): 34–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1662/0002-7685(2007)69[34:nprftu]2.0.co;2.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Sattler, David N., Patrick E. McKnight, Linda Naney, and Randy Mathis. "Grant Peer Review: Improving Inter-Rater Reliability with Training." PLOS ONE 10, no. 6 (2015): e0130450. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130450.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

BORNMANN, L., R. MUTZ, and H. DANIEL. "Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis." Journal of Informetrics 1, no. 3 (2007): 226–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2007.03.001.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Wessely, Simon. "Peer review of grant applications: what do we know?" Lancet 352, no. 9124 (1998): 301–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(97)11129-1.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Rasmussen, Jesper, Vibeke Langer, and Hugo Fjelsted Alrøe. "Bias in Peer Review of Organic Farming Grant Applications." Agriculture and Human Values 23, no. 2 (2006): 181–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10460-005-6105-6.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Kotchen, Theodore A. "NIH Peer Review of Grant Applications for Clinical Research." JAMA 291, no. 7 (2004): 836. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.7.836.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Köhler, Tine, M. Gloria González-Morales, George C. Banks, et al. "Supporting robust, rigorous, and reliable reviewing as the cornerstone of our profession: Introducing a competency framework for peer review." Industrial and Organizational Psychology 13, no. 1 (2020): 1–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/iop.2019.121.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractPeer review is a critical component toward facilitating a robust science in industrial and organizational (I-O) psychology. Peer review exists beyond academic publishing in organizations, university departments, grant agencies, classrooms, and many more work contexts. Reviewers are responsible for judging the quality of research conducted and submitted for evaluation. Furthermore, they are responsible for treating authors and their work with respect, in a supportive and developmental manner. Given its central role in our profession, it is curious that we do not have formalized review g

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Ortenberg, Elia, and Shalanda Bynum. "Shining a Light Inside the “Black Box” of NIH Application Submission and Review." Innovation in Aging 5, Supplement_1 (2021): 759–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.2815.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract What happens to applications after they are submitted to the National Institutes of Health, and how can you better prepare yourself and your application for the process of peer review? The Center for Scientific Review (CSR) works closely with the 24 funding institutes and centers at the National Institutes of Health that provide funding support for projects of high scientific merit and high potential impact. CSR conducts the first level of review for the majority of grant applications submitted to the NIH, which includes 90% of R01s, 85% of Fellowships, and 95% of Small Business Innov

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Paul, Chan, Dossick Carrie, Hacker Miriam, et al. "Journal Reviews and Revisions: Advice from an Early Career Panel Discussion." Engineering Project Organization Journal 9, no. 1 (2020): 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.25219/epoj.2020.00101.

Full text

Abstract:

Peer review is a cornerstone of high-quality research. While attending PhD programmes, we mostly interact with advisors, however the academic quality of our work is ultimately judged by a broader range of academic peers. For early career researchers, transitioning into independent thought-leaders requires increasing exposure with our community of peers, and inevitably engaging with review practices - both as authors and reviewers. Whilst many PhD programmes around the world offer training on paper and grant reviews, journal paper reviews remain somewhat vague to many researchers at all levels

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Vodyanitskaya, E. "Peer Review Regulation in the German Science and Research Association." MGIMO Review of International Relations, no. 5(26) (October 28, 2012): 227–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2012-5-26-227-234.

Full text

Abstract:

The article describes peer review procedures used by the German Science and Research Association. It gives thorough analysis of the stages of peer review and provides a number of critical comments to the procedure regarding provision of additional information to grant applicants, increased reimbursement of the reviewers, reveal of information about the reviewers.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!