Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Grelling's paradox

Contents

Journal articles
Dissertations / Theses
Books
Book chapters

Academic literature on the topic 'Grelling's paradox'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 28 January 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Grelling's paradox.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Grelling's paradox"

1

Ketland, J. "Jacquette on Grelling's Paradox." Analysis 65, no. 3 (July 1, 2005): 258–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/analys/65.3.258.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Cabe, Patrick A. "Grelling's Paradox and the Stroop Effect." Perceptual and Motor Skills 87, no. 3 (December 1998): 848–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.1998.87.3.848.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Newhard, Jay. "Grelling’s Paradox." Philosophical Studies 126, no. 1 (October 2005): 1–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-7808-z.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Palomäki, Jari. "The Word “Word” and the Concept “Word.” Three Solutions to Grelling’s Paradox." Dialogue and Universalism 23, no. 1 (2013): 143–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/du201323126.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Vdovichenko, Andrey V. "Classical and Communicative Sign Models in Explanation of the Grelling – Nelson Paradox Part I." Voprosy Filosofii, no. 11 (2021): 108–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2021-11-108-122.

Full text

Abstract:

К.Grelling – L.Nelson’s paradox arises if the author (authors) and the addressee (addressees) use the classical linguistic model of meaning formation, which postulates that self-referential signs (words), or modules “form – meaning”, are employed and understood in word-containing semiotic procedures. The communicative model of meaning formation, on the contrary, states the impossibility of an autonomous reference of a sign, considers an attempt at indirect influence (i.e., process) as the only possible object of reference and understanding in a given communicative act, recognizes the action

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Ahmad, Rashed. "A Recipe for Paradox." Australasian Journal of Logic 19, no. 5 (December 20, 2022): 254–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.26686/ajl.v19i5.7887.

Full text

Abstract:

In this paper, we provide a recipe that not only captures the common structure of semantic paradoxes but also captures our intuitions regarding the relations between these paradoxes. Before we unveil our recipe, we first talk about a well-known schema introduced by Graham Priest, namely, the Inclosure Schema. Without rehashing previous arguments against the Inclosure Schema, we contribute different arguments for the same concern that the Inclosure Schema bundles together the wrong paradoxes. That is, we will provide further arguments on why the Inclosure Schema is both too narrow and too broad

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Vdovichenko, Andrey V. "Classical and Communicative Sign Models in Explanation of the Grelling – Nelson Paradox Part II." Voprosy Filosofii, no. 2 (2022): 117–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2022-2-117-134.

Full text

Abstract:

К. Grelling – L. Nelson’s paradox arises if the author (authors) and the addressee (addressees) use the classical linguistic model of meaning formation, which postulates that self-referential signs (words), or modules “form – meaning”, are employed and understood in word-containing semiotic procedures. The communicative model of meaning formation, on the contrary, states the impossibility of an autonomous reference of a sign, considers an attempt at indirect influence (i.e., process) as the only possible object of reference and understanding in a given communicative act, recognizes the acti

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

DEAN, WALTER. "INCOMPLETENESS VIA PARADOX AND COMPLETENESS." Review of Symbolic Logic 13, no. 3 (May 23, 2019): 541–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1755020319000212.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractThis paper explores the relationship borne by the traditional paradoxes of set theory and semantics to formal incompleteness phenomena. A central tool is the application of the Arithmetized Completeness Theorem to systems of second-order arithmetic and set theory in which various “paradoxical notions” for first-order languages can be formalized. I will first discuss the setting in which this result was originally presented by Hilbert & Bernays (1939) and also how it was later adapted by Kreisel (1950) and Wang (1955) in order to obtain formal undecidability results. A generalizatio

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Grelling's paradox"

1

Eldridge-Smith, Peter, and peter eldridge-smith@anu edu au. "The Liar Paradox and its Relatives." The Australian National University. Faculty of Arts, 2008. http://thesis.anu.edu.au./public/adt-ANU20081016.173200.

Full text

Abstract:

My thesis aims at contributing to classifying the Liar-like paradoxes (and related Truth-teller-like expressions) by clarifying distinctions and relationships between these expressions and arguments. Such a classification is worthwhile, firstly, because it makes some progress towards reducing a potential infinity of versions into a finite classification; secondly, because it identifies a number of new paradoxes, and thirdly and most significantly, because it corrects the historically misplaced distinction between semantic and set-theoretic paradoxes. I emphasize the third result because the di

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Eldridge-Smith, Peter. "The Liar Paradox and its Relatives." Phd thesis, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/1885/49284.

Full text

Abstract:

My thesis aims at contributing to classifying the Liar-like paradoxes (and related Truth-teller-like expressions) by clarifying distinctions and relationships between these expressions and arguments. Such a classification is worthwhile, firstly, because it makes some progress towards reducing a potential infinity of versions into a finite classification; secondly, because it identifies a number of new paradoxes, and thirdly and most significantly, because it corrects the historically misplaced distinction between semantic and set-theoretic paradoxes. I emphasize the third result because the di

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Grelling's paradox"

1

Armour-Garb, Bradley, Peter Unger, and Bradley Armour-Garb. From No People to No Languages. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199896042.003.0002.

Full text

Abstract:

This chapter shows that the method that Peter Unger (1979, 1980) has developed for dealing with the sorites paradox can, and perhaps should, be extended and applied to the semantic paradoxes—specifically, to Grelling’s paradox and to the liar paradox. After carefully explicating Unger’s earlier method for treating the sorites, the chapter expands on a very brief, compact argument in which he (1979) contends that, in light of certain putatively paradoxical semantic expressions, which are not obviously soritical, there are no expressions and, hence, no languages. The concluding section of the ch

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Grelling's paradox"

1

Burton-Roberts, Noel. "Grelling’s paradox." In Perspectives on Semantics, Pragmatics, and Discourse, 187–201. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pbns.90.16bur.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Grzegorczyk, Andrzej. "The Paradox of Grelling and Nelson Presented as a Veridical Observation Concerning Naming." In The Lvov-Warsaw School and Contemporary Philosophy, 183–90. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5108-5_15.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

"The Genesis of Grelling’s Paradox." In Logik und Mathematik, 269–80. De Gruyter, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110887792.269.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!