Academic literature on the topic 'Gruen (Victor) and Associates'

1903-, Gruen Victor, ed. Mall maker: Victor Gruen, architect of an American dream. University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004.

Moore, Ruble, Yudell, Architects & Planners, Gruen Associates, and Aedes am Pfefferberg (Berlin, Germany), eds. The Berlin Embassy: Moore Ruble Yudell, architects & planners with Gruen Associates = Die Amerikanische Botschaft. Aedes, 2008.

Cerf, Marcel. Marie Mercier, Victor Hugo & l'infortuné Maurice Garreau. M. Cerf, 1987.

Dubos, Jean-Claude. Victor Hugo et les Franc-Comtois. Éditions Cabédita, 2002.

Dubos, Jean-Claude. Victor Hugo et les Franc-Comtois. Cabédita, 2002.

Marks, Andrew R. The rabbi and the poet: Victor Reichert and Robert Frost. Andover Green Book Publishers, 1994.

1937-, Bishop A. G., and Bostridge Mark, eds. Letters from a lost generation: The First World War letters of Vera Brittain and four friends - Roland Leighton, Edward Brittain, Victor Richardson, Geoffrey Thurlow. Little, Brown, 1998.

Brittain, Vera. Letters from a lost generation: The First World War letters of Vera Brittain and four friends, Roland Leighton, Edward Brittain, Victor Richardson, Geoffrey Thurlow. Little, Brown and Company, 1998.

Thomas, Hoobler, ed. The monsters: Mary Shelley and the curse of Frankenstein. Little, Brown, 2006.

Victor Gruen: From urban shop to new city. Actar, 2005.

Marchi, Leonardo Zuccaro. "First UD Conference and Victor Gruen." In The Heart of the City. Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315557298-3.

"CHAPTER 2. Building Socialism’s Future: Victor Gruen in Vienna." In Free-Market Socialists. Central European University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9789633864487-004.

"Front Matter." In Corrosion Effect of Stray Currents and the Techniques for Evaluating Corrosion of Rebars in Concrete. ASTM International100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, 1985. http://dx.doi.org/10.1520/stp18295s.

"pride which makes a mortal forget his place in the order of things), the word is most often used of dealings between human beings. It generally describes behaviour which is uncontrolled and which presupposes a desire to humiliate or at least a contempt for the rights and prestige of others. It could be applied to anything from mockery through verbal insult to physical assault, including rape. However, in law the term was narrower. The law on hybris quoted at Dem. 21.47 appears to cover action, not words. It is likely, moreover, that in legal contexts at least, though the law was imprecise (it appears to have begun: ‘if anyone commits outrage [hybris] against someone . . .’), the offence was generally understood to cover physical violence. It is not clear what converted aikeia into hybris, but it may be suggested that where the speaker could argue that the assault was committed either with the intention of humiliating or with wilful disregard for the status of the victim then the action for outrage might succeed. In the present case the action of Konon in imitating a victorious fighting cock after beating Ariston could be held to prove either. In explaining his reasons for choosing the private action, Ariston naturally places the emphasis on modesty (a public action would require more boldness and greater legal experience than a young man should in this culture possess) and restraint. In the process he suppresses other motives. As was explained in the general introduction, the prosecutor in a public action faced serious penalties if lie either dropped the case or failed to obtain 20 per cent of the judges’ votes. In addition, since on most reconstructions hybris involved the state of mind or intention of the perpetrator it would be more difficult to prove than aikeia, for which the fact of striking first sufficed. Finally, if Konon were convicted in a public action for hybris any fine would go to the state, while the victor in a private action for aikeia stood to gain compensation. The case against Konon is presented with remarkable force, and one’s first impression is that Ariston’s case is overwhelming. As to the assault itself, Ariston has good evidence from a doctor that he was severely beaten. That Konon was actually the perpetrator is suggested by Konon’s behaviour at arbitration (for which Ariston has witness testimony); evidently Konon had difficulty assembling a case, and it appears that it was only when his situation was looking desperate that his associates gave evidence on his behalf. However, it is far from clear that the witnesses who carried Ariston home actually saw the attack; they may merely have found him lying beaten. It may be that the only witness on Ariston’s side was his friend Phanostratos. From §§30–3 one." In Trials from Classical Athens. Routledge, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203130476-28.

Nedbaev, D. N., S. V. Nedbaeva, O. V. Goncharova, I. B. Kotova, and M. M. Filin. "IMPROVEMENT, GREEN CONSTRUCTION AND LANDSCAPE DESIGN AS AN ACTUAL ECOLOGICAL CHALLENGE OF YOUTH." In INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN SCIENCE AND EDUCATION. DSTU-Print, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.23947/itno.2020.89-94.

Epel, Bernard L., Roger N. Beachy, A. Katz, et al. Isolation and Characterization of Plasmodesmata Components by Association with Tobacco Mosaic Virus Movement Proteins Fused with the Green Fluorescent Protein from Aequorea victoria. United States Department of Agriculture, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.32747/1999.7573996.bard.