Relevant bibliographies by topics / Güneydoğu Anadolu Projesi (Turkey)

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters
  5. Conference papers

Academic literature on the topic 'Güneydoğu Anadolu Projesi (Turkey)'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 31 July 2024

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Güneydoğu Anadolu Projesi (Turkey).'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Güneydoğu Anadolu Projesi (Turkey)"

1

Özok-Gündoğan, Nilay. "“Social Development” as a Governmental Strategy in the Southeastern Anatolia Project." New Perspectives on Turkey 32 (2005): 93–111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s089663460000412x.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper examines the “social development” practices carried out within the framework of the Southeast Anatolia Project (Güneydoğu Anadolu Projesior GAP) in Turkey in the 1990s. In its initial phase, GAP was a state-run regional development project in southeast Anatolia which consisted of massive infrastructural investments. But beginning in the late 1980s, and especially in the 1990s, the scope of GAP expanded to include a set of social projects. The emergence and transformation of the notion of social development within GAP constitute the major focus of this study.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Bilgen, Arda. "The Southeastern Anatolia Project (GAP) revisited: The evolution of GAP over forty years." New Perspectives on Turkey 58 (May 2018): 125–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/npt.2018.8.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThe Southeastern Anatolia Project (Güneydoğu Anadolu Projesi, GAP) is arguably the largest regional development project ever witnessed in Turkey. Begun in the 1970s, GAP initially aimed primarily at the construction of 22 dams and 19 hydroelectric power plants on the Tigris and Euphrates rivers and of extensive irrigation networks to produce hydroelectric energy and water 1.8 million hectares of land in southeastern Turkey. Later, the scope of GAP broadened significantly as it became a more ambitious and comprehensive scheme of modernization and transformation. Following this expansion, the multidimensionality of GAP and its multifaceted implications became clearer at both the national and international level. The project grew more visible and influential not only in political and public discourses, but also in the GAP region itself. Despite these developments, however, the question of how the project’s characteristics, vocabulary, rationales, and mechanisms have changed since its inception remains underdiscussed. This article asks what GAP was in the past and what it has more recently become. It examines the gradual transformation of GAP over forty years by specifically taking into account the continuities and ruptures in development discourse, theory, and practice since the 1950s. In this way, the article aims to provide a new perspective regarding the stages through which the project has passed to reach its current form.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Memish, O. "The South-East Anatolia Project (Güneydoğu Anadolu Projesi) as a means of leveling the disproportions of regional development in the Republic of Turkey." Cherkasy University Bulletin: Historical Sciences, no. 1 (2022): 161–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.31651/2076-5908-2022-1-161-167.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Akpinar, Nevin, Ilkden Talay, and Sema Gun. "Priority setting in agricultural land-use types for sustainable development." Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 20, no. 3 (September 2005): 136–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/raf200483.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractEven in developing countries that are faced with ecological and socio-economic problems, agricultural areas are constrained by land-use laws to be developed in particular ways. This being the case, the major issues in these areas are a better quality of life and sustainable use of the limited resources. This necessitates planning for sustainable development and evaluating various qualitative and quantitative data in a single framework. Multicriteria or multipurpose decision analysis methods are appropriate for this purpose. Using these methods, physical, economical and social data, as well as planning goals, can be combined and evaluated in the context of sustainable development. These multicriteria methods have been documented widely in a variety of problem areas, but two multicriteria methods, namely AHP (analytic hierarchy process) and ELECTRE II (elimination and choice translating reality), have not been used extensively in agricultural land-use decisions in developing countries. However, in situations where decision-making criteria are non-commensurable, non-comparable or non-countable, and when it is necessary to evaluate the criteria together, as in agricultural land-use decisions, AHP and ELECTRE II methods are warranted. This study reviews these methods briefly and suggests their potential application in the agricultural land-use decision process in a developing country. For this purpose, these methods were sampled in Ziyaret Stream Basin in Adiyaman, which is part of the Güneydoğu Anadolu Projesi (GAP) (South-eastern Anatolian Project) in the Republic of Turkey. The area could be characterized by its rural and agricultural features, although it is under the pressure of Adiyaman urban development. This study shows that both AHP and ELECTRE II methods can be applied successfully for the determination of agricultural land-use priorities, which are an essential part of the quality of life and of sustainable land-use studies.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Serefoğlu, Coskun, and Mutlu Yılmaz. "Euphrates and Tigris rivers from the perspectives of the experts working on transboundary water management Sınıraşan akarsuların yönetimi konusunda çalışan uzmanların bakış açısından Dicle ve Fırat nehirleri." Journal of Human Sciences 16, no. 1 (January 12, 2019): 73. http://dx.doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v16i1.5432.

Full text
Abstract:
The objective of this study is to analyse Euphrates-Tigris basins, which across Turkey, Iraq and Syria, one of the most important transboundary waters of the world from the perspectives of the experts working on transboundary water management. With this purpose, a method which aims to determine and analyze the viewpoints of policy makers, think-tank institutions, experts and the authorities on river management. What kind of transboundary water management techniques could be applied for the basin was eventually searched. The study is based on secondary sources and the method adopted is a case study and descriptive studies. Turkey has five transboundary water basins, one of which Euphrates-Tigris basin has the water potential of 52,940 billion/meter3 that corresponds to 28.5 % of Turkey’s flow potential. The first agreements on Euphrates-Tigris rivers in between Turkey and Iraq and Turkey and Syria were made in 1946 and in 1987, respectively. One of the most challenging issue in Euphrates-Tigris rivers is the dams which have been constructed during the project period of Southeastern Development project. Another discussion point comes from definition for Euphrates-Tigris rivers from both sides. Turkey sees Euphrates-Tigris rivers as “Transboundary water” by highlighting three countries only negotiate it while Both Syria and Iraq defines it as “International water”. In general, it is quite important to make a collaboration process among three countries regarding cooperation and good governance. Also, preparing of the action plans for the future of the region, with a wide range of stakeholders will enhance cooperation among countries and facilitate financial contribution of relevant institutions on water management.Extended English summary is in the end of Full Text PDF (TURKISH) file. ÖzetBu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye, Irak ve Suriye sınırlarından geçen ve Dünyanın en önemli sınır aşan akarsulardan olan Fırat ve Dicle nehirlerini sınır aşan akarsuların yönetimi konusunda çalışan uzmanların bakış açısından incelemektir. Bu amaçla bu üç ülkede akarsuların yönetimi konusunda çalışan uzmanların düşüncelerinin tespiti ve analizi yoluna gidilmiştir. Sonuçta adı geçen sınır aşan akarsuların ne tür bir sınır aşan su yönetimi ile yönetilmesi gerektiği sorusuna cevap bulunmasına çalışılmıştır. Çalışma durum çalışması ve betimsel analiz yöntemleri yoluyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu bağlamda ikincil kaynaklardan ve yarı yapılandırılmış mülakatlardan elde edilen bilgi ve görüşlerin analizine dayanmaktadır. Türkiye’nin beş sınıraşan akarsu su havzası bulunmaktadır. Bunlardan en büyüğü 52 940 milyar m3 su potansiyeli ile Türkiye’nin akarsu akış potensiyelinin % 28,5’ini teşkil eden Fırat- Dicle Havzası’dır. Bu akarsu havzasının yönetimi konusunda Türkiye-Irak ve Türkiye-Suriye ülkeleri arasında ilk anlaşmalar sırasıyla 1946 ve 1987 yıllarında yapılmıştır. Güneydoğu Anadolu Projesi kapsamında inşa edilen barajlar dolayısıyle adı geçen ülkeler havzanın akarsu kaynaklarının yönetimi konusunda sorun yaşamaya başlamışlardır. Diğer yandan taraflar akarsu kaynaklarının yönetimi konusunda tanımlama farkından ileri gelen sorunlar da yaşamaktadırlar. Türkiye, Dicle ve Fırat nehirlerini “Sınıraşan Su” olarak görüp, bu nehirlerin kullanımı ile ilgili yalnızca üç ülkenin müzakere edebileceği görüşünü savunurken, hem Suriye hem de Irak sözkonusu nehirleri “Uluslararası Su” olarak kabul etmektedirler. Bu akarsu havzalarının taraf olan üç ülke tarafından işbirliği ve iyi yönetişim temelinde yönetilmesi oldukça önemlidir. Ayrıca, bölgenin geleceği için hazırlanacak olan eylem planlarının paydaşlar tarafından geniş katılımla hazırlanması, ülkeler arasındaki işbirliğini artıracak ve akarsu yönetimi konusunda ilgili kurumların finansal katkısını hızlandıracaktır.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

ÇELİK, Hüseyin. "YOKSULLUK VE KIRSAL KALKINMA POLİTİKALARI: GÜNEYDOĞU ANADOLU PROJESİ İÇİN BİR DEĞERLENDİRME." İktisadi İdari ve Siyasal Araştırmalar Dergisi 1, no. 1 (October 30, 2016): 29. http://dx.doi.org/10.25204/iktisad.296719.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Morozov, Anatolii, and Oksana Memish. "Проєкт Південно-Східної Анатолії (Güneydoğu Anadolu Projesi) у політиці сучасної Туреччини." Eminak, no. 4(44) (January 13, 2024): 266–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.33782/eminak2023.4(44).686.

Full text
Abstract:
Мета дослідження полягає у з’ясуванні цілей і значення Проєкту Південно-Східної Анатолії (турецька абревіатура – Güneydoğu Anadolu Projesi, далі – GAP), який є багатогалузевим інтегрованим регіональний проєктом розвитку на основі концепції сталого розвитку південно-східного регіону Туреччини. Важливою складовою GAP було те, що у ньому, поряд із розв’язанням питань суто економічного характеру, завжди малося на меті поліпшення соціального становища населення традиційно відсталих південно-східних регіонів. Наукова новизна визначається відсутністю спеціального комплексного дослідження, яке б торкалося витоків, територіальних обсягів і природних особливостей GAP. Не менше значення має те, що в силу прагнення Туреччини до вступу в Європейський Союз, відповідними інституціями Євроспільноти перед нею було поставлене пряме та конкретне завдання, яке передбачало вирішення цілого комплексу суспільно-політичних і соціально-економічних проблем, які торкалися умов життя найбільшої, на сьогодні, сталої етнічної спільноти, яка все ще не має власної державності – курдів. Висновки. Соціально-економічне та політичне значення GAP полягає у тому, що його реалізація дозволяє збалансувати розвиток східних і південно-східних регіонів Туреччини та привести рівень життя їх людності у відповідність до тих стандартів, які були притаманні населенню західних і північно-західних регіонів країни. Одним із найважливіших досягнень GAP є те, що його реалізація дозволить забезпечити виробництво гідроелектроенергії за рахунок використання водних ресурсів рік Тигра та Євфрату. Слід зазначити, що GAP дозволила створити достатню кількість робочих місць і тим самим ліквідувати хронічне безробіття місцевого населення, а отже значно зменшити соціально-економічну та суспільно-політичну напругу, яка ще донедавна мала місце на цих територіях. Значення GAP полягає також у тому, що його реалізація дозволить Туреччині відігравати роль регіонального лідера на Близькому та Середньому Сході, а також претендувати на місце «житниці Близького Сходу», особливо в арабському світі.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Sedat, BENEK. "ORTAYA ÇIKIŞI, GELİŞME SEYRİ VE BÖLGEYE ETKİLERİ BAKIMINDAN GÜNEYDOĞU ANADOLU PROJESİ (GAP)." Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi 64, no. 3 (2009): 45–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1501/sbfder_0000002113.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

İrfan ; YILDIRIM, ÖZGÜNLÜK. "Güneydoğu Anadolu Projesi (GAP) kapsamındaki bölgede halk elinde yetiştirilen sığırlarda bovine leukemia virus (BLV) enfeksiyonunun seroprevalansı." Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 50, no. 1 (2005): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1501/vetfak_0000000032.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

M. Murat, ERDOĞAN. ""Olağandışı Oy Verme Davranışı" ve Mobilize Katılım : Güneydoğu Anadolu Projesi Bölgesinde Toplu Oy Veren Köyler Üzerine Bir Araştırma." Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi 47, no. 1 (1992): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1501/sbfder_0000001529.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Güneydoğu Anadolu Projesi (Turkey)"

1

Harb, Julie. "Le projet GAP de la Turquie : au-delà du développement." Thesis, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/1866/24128.

Full text
Abstract:
Le Projet GAP ou «South-East Anatolia Development Project » en Turquie est l'un des vastes projets de développement au monde, consistant en la construction de 21 barrages et de 19 centres hydro-électriques sur les fleuves de l'Euphrate et du Tigre. Toutefois, ce projet pose de nombreuses controverses au cours de la dernière décennie tant au niveau national, avec la question kurde, qu'au niveau régional, en raison de l'enjeu du partage de l'eau avec les pays voisins, notamment la Syrie et l'Irak. Néanmoins, ce sujet fut évoqué dans la plupart des cas sous l'angle exclusif de la question conflictuelle kurde. Les objectifs de mon mémoire cherchent à comprendre l’utilisation du projet GAP par le gouvernement turc dans les constructions nationales et politiques de la Turquie de 1930 et 1980 dans un but de souveraineté et puissance nationale. Cette analyse s’effectue dans un cadre plus général de géopolitique et d’histoire politique. En s'appuyant sur des travaux en matière de géopolitique et de puissance, et surtout sur les théories de construction nationale, ce mémoire se penche sur l'évolution du projet GAP, ainsi que sur son instrumentalisation dans la construction nationale de 1930 et la reconstruction politique et nationale de 1980.
The GAP or “South-Eastern Anatolia Development Project” in Turkey is one of the vast development projects in the world, consisting of the construction of 21 dams and 19 hydroelectric centers on the Euphrates and Tigris rivers. However, this project posed many controversies during the last decade both at the national level, with the Kurdish question, and at the regional level, because of the issue of sharing water with neighboring countries, notably Syria and Iraq. Nevertheless, this subject was debated in most cases exclusively from the perspective of the Kurdish conflict issue. The objectives of my dissertation are to understand the use of the GAP project by the Turkish government in the national and political constructions of Turkey in 1930 and 1980 with the aim of sovereignty and national power. This analysis is carried out in a more general framework of geopolitics and political history. Drawn on work of geopolitics and power, and especially on theories of national construction, this dissertation focuses mainly on the evolution of the GAP project, as well as its instrumentalization in the national construction of 1930 and the political and national reconstruction of 1980.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Güneydoğu Anadolu Projesi (Turkey)"

1

Joerg, Dietziker, ed. Wasser als Waffe: Türkische Dämme und Schweizer Helfer : die Bedeutung des Südostanatolienprojekts GAP und die geplante Zerstörung von Hasankeyf durch Sulzer Hydro und ABB Schweiz. Zürich: Focus, 1998.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Ahmet, Özer. GAP'a makro düzeyde bakış. Diyarbakır [Turkey]: Dicle Üniversitesi, GAP Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi, 1991.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Demir, Nazmiye. GAP bölgesi'nde verimliliğe ilişkin çalışmalar ve önceliklerinin belirlenmesi. Ankara: Milli Prodüktivite Merkezi, 1993.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Şeker, Murat. Güneydoğu Anadolu Projesi: Sosyal ve ekonomik sorunlar. Kızılay, Ankara: V Yayınları, 1987.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Aytar, Osman. Kürdün "makûs talih"i ve Güneydoğu Anadolu Projesi: Sorunlar ve gerçekler. Cağaloğlu, İstanbul: Medya Güneşi Yayınları, 1991.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Çakar, Gülşen Erenler. GAP illeri sanayi envanteri: Araştırma raporu, Envanter bilgileri : GAP ve sanayi kongresine doğru. Ankara: TMMOB Makina Mühendisleri Odası, 1999.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Topdemir, Ramazan. Atatürku'ün doğu-Güneydoğu politikası ve GAP. [Şanlıurfa, Turkey]: Ramazan Topdemir, 2008.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Ahmet, Özer. Güneydoğu Anadolu ve GAP gerçeği: Sosyo-ekonomik ve kültürel boyutlar. Demirtepe [Turkey]: Damar, 1990.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Güneydoğu Anadolu Projesi (Turkey). Bölge Kalkınma İdaresi Başkanlığı., ed. Güneydoğu Anadolu Projesi'nde son durum: Temmuz 1998. Çankaya, Ankara: T.C. Başbakanlık Güneydoğu Anadolu Projesi GAP Bölge Kalkınma İdaresi Başkanlığı, 1998.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Bağış, A. İ. The cradle of civilisation regenerated. [İstanbul, Turkey: Gelişim Yayınları, 1989.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Güneydoğu Anadolu Projesi (Turkey)"

1

Amery, Hussein A. "Malthus in the Middle East." In Water and Conflict in the Middle East, 15–40. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197552636.003.0002.

Full text
Abstract:
Using a Malthusian framework, Chapter 3 draws parallels between political economy of the Southeast Anatolian (Güneydoğu Anadolu Projesi or GAP) dam project in Turkey that affects water flow to the downstream neighbors of Syria and Iraq on the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers and the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) nearing completion on the Blue Nile in Ethiopia – a project that will impound waters destined for Egypt. It finds that in each case, geographical and hydropolitical positioning are the essential elements of downstream state insecurity and therefore a significant causes of deteriorating relations within the respective river basins. While noting that although the riparian states in question have long histories of tension and distrust, the historical record shows that the vast majority of global water disputes are settled peacefully. The chapter presents evidence that in the lower riparian states, rapid population growth, infrastructure development, and climate change present adverse and cumulative effects on water supplies and water management. The author concludes with the argument that the convergence of these factors points to a likely future of water scarcity-induced conflict absent the introduction of policies to boost irrigation efficiency and improve water governance.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Меміш, О. М. "ЗНАЧЕННЯ ПРОЄКТУ ПІВДЕННО-СХІДНОЇ АНАТОЛІЇ (GÜNEYDOĞU ANADOLU PROJESI) ДЛЯ СОЦІАЛЬНО-ЕКОНОМІЧНОГО РОЗВИТКУ ТУРЕЧЧИНИ." In VІ КОНГРЕС СХОДОЗНАВЦІВ, 165–68. Liha-Pres, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-288-6-43.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Güneydoğu Anadolu Projesi (Turkey)"

1

Bahtiyar, İ., İ. Açıkbaş, Ö. Aksu, H. Can, and M. G. Aydın. "Güneydoğu Anadolu (Türkiye) Petrol Sistemi (The Petroleum Systems of Southeast Anatolia (Turkey))." In 19th International Petroleum and Natural Gas Congress and Exhibition of Turkey. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.380.55.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Erik, N. Y. "Triyas Yaşlı Bakük Formasyonu’nun (Cudi Grubu, Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi) Organik Jeokimyasal Özelliği ve Hidrokarbon Türüm Potansiyeli." In 19th International Petroleum and Natural Gas Congress and Exhibition of Turkey. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.380.137.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

İztan, Y. H., H. Çorbacıoğlu, A. Canatalı, E. E. Tokoğlu, and P. Yılmazer. "Libya Murzuk Baseni Petrolleri ile Türkiye Güneydoğu Anadolu (GDA) Siluriyen Yaşlı Kaynak Kayalardan Türeyen Petrollerin Jeokimyasal Korelasyonu." In 19th International Petroleum and Natural Gas Congress and Exhibition of Turkey. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.380.59.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Güneydoğu Anadolu Projesi (Turkey)' for particular source types:
Journal articles Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography