Academic literature on the topic 'Guy debord'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Guy debord.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Guy debord"
Matos, Olgária Chain Feres. "Guy Debord:." Revista Limiar 1, no. 1 (March 24, 2019): 1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.34024/limiar.2013.v1.9289.
Full textSmith, Jason E. "Guy Debord, Filmmaker." Grey Room 52 (July 2013): 7–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/grey_e_00112.
Full textAngaut, Jean-Christophe. "Guy Debord et l’anarchisme." Revue Française d'Histoire des Idées Politiques N° 55, no. 1 (July 21, 2022): 15–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/rfhip1.055.0015.
Full textWinestine, Zack. "Howls for Guy Debord." Film Quarterly 62, no. 4 (2009): 14–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/fq.2009.62.4.14.
Full textLyra de Carvalho, Frederico. "Debord e o hegelo-marxismo francês. Resenha de La librairie de Guy Debord. Marx Hegel." Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN) 29, no. 58 (February 28, 2022): 178–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.21680/1983-2109.2022v29n58id28180.
Full textMarcolini, Patrick. "Guy Debord et la technologie." Revue Française d'Histoire des Idées Politiques N° 55, no. 1 (July 21, 2022): 119–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/rfhip1.055.0119.
Full textApostolidès, Jean-Marie. "Guy Debord, vingt ans après." Critique 814, no. 3 (2015): 225. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/criti.814.0225.
Full textKaufmann, Vincent. "The Lessons of Guy Debord." October 115 (January 2006): 31–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/octo.2006.115.1.31.
Full textHussey, A. "La mélancolie de Guy Debord." PSN 6, no. 1 (February 2008): 1–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11836-008-0053-3.
Full textSARMENTO-PANTOJA, Augusto, and Tânia SARMENTO-PANTOJA. "Kluge e debord: projeções entre escrita especulativa e produção artística." MOARA – Revista Eletrônica do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Letras ISSN: 0104-0944, no. 41 (December 3, 2014): 24. http://dx.doi.org/10.18542/moara.v0i41.1954.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Guy debord"
Turpain, Sébastien. "Guy Debord mémorialiste." Sorbonne Paris Cité, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016USPCC001.
Full textThis works aims to show how and why the work of Guy Debord (1931 - 1994) can be seen as a series of fragments, which together constitute the Memoirs of the author, and also aims to measure their originality and singularity, both in substance and in form. This approach is innovative because the criticism surrounding the work of Debord never chose to consider his work in this global perspective, leaving a gap to fill. This work therefore aims to highlight the fact that these « Memoirs » can only find Their unity in the perspective of a lifetime because, being composed of a series of fragments, they indicate the author's stance as a memorialist throughout his entire life This work also tends to show that, although these « Memoirs » naturally tell a story, evoke an era, and recount events, they themseives have a story that can be reconstructed. More conventionally, the « Memoirs » of Guy Debord are placed at the crossroads of autobiography and historiography, and aim to play a role. These Memoirs are testimonies that intend to be useful: they are communications. They combine not only narration and portrait, but also social criticism, reflection on the lives of men (like the Memoirs of Saint -Simon), and historiography. Such a study implies a three-step approach. First, there is the life of the author, interwoven with his work, and put into narrative form in a manner that is constantly evolving, from the often « incomprehensible » allusions or evocations of the early works, to the clearly autobiographical book Panegyric. Then, there is the social criticism, the vision of the moralist on the present time, which is regularly compared to a glorified past. Guy Debord then takes on the role of an orator, invoking Bossuet, La Boétie, Saint-Simon, to better reprimand the mores of his times. The Memoirs are Also a way to write, from a personal point of view, the more or less secret history of a time, with both the intention of serving history and of carrying out a reflection on the life of men throughout history or the passage of time. Finally, the memoirs are an attempt at a more intimate act of communication, a more intimate account of the author's life (implying a certain exemplarity), and also an attempt at sharing with an «ideal » public. The theme of communication - what is communicable, transmissible, or not - tends to be central to Guy Debord's work, especially towards the end of his life, and is marked by the question of the passage of his testimony to posterity
Seddiki, Yalla. "Guy Debord : automythographe." Thesis, Paris 4, 2012. http://www.theses.fr/2012PA040097.
Full textTheoretician, “Strategist” – as he defined himself –, film director, actor in his own films exclusively, memorialist, revolutionary, member of the Lettrist movement (initiated by Isidore Isou) and member of Socialism or Barbarism, a political organisation ; co-founder of the Lettrist International (1952-1957) and of the Situationist International (1957-1972), Guy Debord aimed for nothing but project features of the exceptional on his works. To do so, he surrounded himself with a few dozens companions, which constitutes the extrinsic basis of the Guy Debord myth. Through the fabric of anecdotes, the first part of this research brings up the key figures he socialised with and the political or artistic avant-garde movements he momentarily supported, and more often confronted, but which determined in part the courses taken by his life and thought. At first, for Guy Debord, it was a case of projecting the emancipatory promises of art and modern poetry onto the urban space and social relations. Then, the realisation of this project becomes subordinated to the project of revolution. However, this goal can not be separated from an aesthetic form, that is to say from an intrinsic basis, “the style of negation”, according to Guy Debord. The second part of this work will focus on this subject. “Drift”, “Influential metagraphy”, “psychogeography”, “situation” and “diversion” are but a few concepts outlining an aesthetic of political and artistic action. Besides, Guy Debord summons a large variety of characters and exemplary narratives – first intuitively, then with a fully controlled conscience –, the power and prestige of which he analogically aims to direct partly at himself. By elaborating an imaginative, mythical and mythographical framework, Guy Debord faces the necessity to overtake the mind-wandering inwardness, towards the accomplishment of the narrative within the historical materiality
Cochard, Bertrand. "Guy Debord et la philosophie." Thesis, Université Côte d'Azur (ComUE), 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2019AZUR2026.
Full textAt the end of the 1950s, Guy Debord sought to confront with German philosophy the ideas and intuitions he first developed within the artistic avant-gardes. He studied Hegel and Marx, discovered heterodox Marxism (Karl Korsch, Georg Lukács, Anton Pannekoek), questioned theorists and commentators of his time (Jean Hyppolite, Henri Lefebvre, Lucien Goldmann) and started using several concepts from these traditions (eg. totality, alienation, commodity, etc.) in his own speech. This work aims to analyze the consequences of his philosophical “turn” in order to question the portrait of Guy Debord as a sociologist who criticized “consumer society”. It is presented in three parts – Aesthetics (I), Critical Philosophy (II), and Philosophy of Time and History (III). Its ambition is to reveal the philosophical singularity of the author of The Society of the Spectacle, especially on matters concerning Philosophy of Time
Etzold, Jörn. "Die melancholische Revolution des Guy-Ernest Debord /." Zürich : Diaphanes, 2009. http://opac.nebis.ch/cgi-bin/showAbstract.pl?u20=9783037340653.
Full textEtzold, Jörn. "Die melancholische Revolution des Guy-Ernest Debord." Zürich Berlin Diaphanes, 2006. http://d-nb.info/992472512/04.
Full textHaritçalde, Christian Campos de Oliveira. "Sonho e espetáculo: uma aproximação à Guy Debord." Universidade de São Paulo, 2014. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/47/47133/tde-01102014-151345/.
Full textThis work intends to present the theory of Guy Debord to psychoanalytic discussions related to social and political theory. To this end it is proposed to trace the conceptual constitution of his society of the spectacle theory, born from the conjunction of the discussions from the critique of political economy in the Marxist camp and the theme of the surpassing of art in the artistic avant-garde, linking this conjunction to the theoretical approaches that Debord makes to psychoanalysis. At a first moment the theory of the spectacle is presented as the update of alienation, reification and commodity fetishism in contemporary societies, then this reflection is linked to the Freudian dream theory through the analogy of the spectacle as a bad dream. In a second step the theory of the surpass of the spectacle is presented through the internal contradictions of advanced capitalism and the pursuit of revolution, then linking this discussion with psychoanalysis through the approximation of capitalism as an economic unconscious that must be brought to consciousness by the revolutionary practice. Finally it is concluded that although Debord is a reader of Freud, his approaches are a particular use of the psychoanalytic theory to the explanation of the society of spectacle theory, but it is still a rich approach for a psychoanalytically oriented discussion of the advanced capitalist society
Bueno, Douglas Aparecido. "Guy Debord e a nova fase do espetáculo." Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, 2017. https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/20108.
Full textMade available in DSpace on 2017-05-19T11:59:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Douglas Aparecido Bueno.pdf: 1459681 bytes, checksum: 0e3879644ba3b9b628d1ff856626c91c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-05-11
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPES
The thesis deals with the spectacle of Guy Debord theory under the aegis of its artistic, political and philosophical influences, putting in relief their main contributions to the analysis and overcoming of the spectacle. The spectacle, to Debord, is a relationship alienated for social and historical construction, which overcomes the media criticism, as is commonly assumed. The thesis reveals that the theory of the spectacle, in its origin, is a philosophical reflection on the story time, and in the light of hermeneutics interprets own theory on that basis. Analyze the theory of the spectacle, from the standpoint of time and story ideas, it offers a way to resolve the hegelian marxism of Guy Debord. The hegelian marxism Debord connects, in theory, its theoretical and philosophical interests in the concepts of strategy, chance and play, from the existential principles and based on these issues, investigates and theorizes the practice, political action in time and social history as a means to overcome the spectacle, or give you a new phase. Furthermore, to the extent that delimits the theory of this epistemological framework, it is apparent deficiencies. The theory of the spectacle is based on the unified separation of the actions of the subject (historical and social) and social interpretation under the same heading, which in turn replaces the Marxian analysis of capital as an antagonistic social relationship rather than the abstract opposition between homogenized and alienated consciousness of history and the world. Although this aspect apparently theoretical problem is, the notions of subjectivity, time and history significant role for social analysis. Putting in relief the Guy Debord’s position that all social action and every theory must be considered as strategic interventions, and that every theory must be an invitation to overcome them, the thesis takes up the hegelian marxism Debord to suggest spectacle that the theory is a sui generis moment within a historical action design. This means that all Debord’s theory provides a collective political will model and suggests a reflection on the possibility of this hermeneutic be developed
A tese analisa a teoria do espetáculo de Guy Debord sob a égide de suas influências filosóficas, colocando em relevo as suas principais contribuições para a análise e superação do espetáculo. O espetáculo, para Debord, é uma relação alienada para a construção social e histórica, que sobrepuja a crítica da mídia, tal como é comumente assumido. A tese revela que a teoria do espetáculo, em sua origem, é uma reflexão filosófica sobre o tempo da história, e à luz dessa hermenêutica, interpreta a própria teoria nessa base. Analisar a teoria do espetáculo, sob o foco das ideias de tempo e história, oferece um caminho para se estudar o marxismo hegeliano de Guy Debord. O marxismo hegeliano de Debord se conecta, na tese, aos seus interesses teórico-filosoficos nos conceitos de estratégia e jogo, a partir dos princípios existênciais e com fundamento nestes temas, investiga e teoriza a práxis, a ação política no tempo e na história social como meios para se superar o espetáculo. Por outro lado, na medida em que se delimita a teoria sobre esse recorte epistemológico, ficam aparentes suas deficiências. A teoria do espetáculo está baseada na separação unificada das ações do sujeito histórico-social e na interpretação social sob a mesma rubrica, que por sua vez, substitui a análise marxiana do capital como uma relação social antagonica, em detrimento da oposição abstrata entre a consciência homogeneizada e alienada da história e do mundo. Muito embora essa vertente teorica, aparentemente, seja problemática, as noções de subjetividade, tempo e história assumem papel relevante para a análise social. Colocando em relevo as posições de Guy Debord de que toda ação social, bem como toda teoria devem ser analisadas como intervenções estratégicas, além de que toda teoria deve ser um convite à sua superação, a tese reveste-se do marxismo hegeliano de Debord para sugerir que a teoria do espetáculo é um momento sui generis dentro de uma concepção de ação histórica. Isso quer dizer que toda a teoria de Debord proporciona um modelo de vontade política coletiva, e sugere uma reflexão sobre a possibilidade dessa hermenêutica ser desenvolvida
Flores, Iberico Héctor Martín. "Guy Debord y el problema de la mercancía." Master's thesis, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, 2012. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12672/9570.
Full textEsta investigación reconstruye las fuentes filosóficas y las consecuencias del análisis que se plantea en “La sociedad del espectáculo” (SdE). Se sitúan las herencias teóricas de Guy Debord en relación con conceptos que el marxismo de izquierda pudo reivindicar como la centralización del problema de la alienación/enajenación por parte de Lukács y los análisis realizados por él a principios del siglo XX. Con la intención de superarla, Debord llevará al extremo la propuesta de “la economía contra la vida” (Jappe), situando el problema del capitalismo o Sociedad del Espectáculo, como una nueva fase del desarrollo capitalista. Para ello realizará una crítica de la producción de manera aislada, desde el polo del consumo, sin considerar la totalidad del proceso productivo (producción – circulación – distribución - consumo), en el sentido del marxismo tradicional. En ese contexto se inserta la crítica al ciudadano-espectador, al trabajador contemporáneo mareado y pasivo, por la inmensa oferta de mercancías. Este sujeto se conduce en relación a las imágenes de un mundo sobre el cual ha perdido toda capacidad de control. Las consecuencias de tal perspectiva son señaladas en la SdE como negativas. Debord caracteriza a las sociedades contemporáneas por su ausencia de vida (goce o gratificación), enfatiza la imposibilidad de existencia en el seno de una sociedad “falsa”. Ello ha conducido a algunos críticos como Frédéric Schiffter (2007) a plantear que la obra de Debord se inserta en la obra de Rousseau como búsqueda de una época pasada y feliz, en donde la comunicación era inmediata (y no mediada) y la gratificación natural no estaba falsificada por la mercancía. Es una crítica a nivel ontológico de los presupuestos de Debord como parte de una crítica al socialismo, que teorizaría el pasado de muchas sociedades como parte del futuro comunitario de la humanidad. Crítica bastante fundamentada tomando en cuenta los niveles de la antropología del siglo XIX en donde se exaltaba la idea de comunidades originarias “buenas”, “pacíficas”, “orgánicas” con respecto a la atomización o fragmentación que el reino de la mercancía había impuesto en su proceso de individuación social e impedía cualquier salida global frente a los problemas generales cuya base material no se cuestionaba y, por lo tanto, aquel estado de cosas se pretendía insuperable. En ese sentido, la tesis analiza los movimientos filosóficos del concepto de mercancía en “La sociedad del espectáculo”. Para ello, reconstruye dichos elementos desde la perspectiva de totalidad e interpreta la relevancia de la obra de Guy Debord para el marxismo contemporáneo.
Tesis
Allard, Stéphane. "Le marxisme de Georg Lukacs et de Guy Debord." Thesis, University of Ottawa (Canada), 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/10393/28593.
Full textCasale, Luis Gustavo. "Guy Debord e vanguardas: combate à sociedade do espetáculo." Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, 2012. https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/11616.
Full textCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
The practical and theoretical activity of Guy Debord is marked by a strategy of refusal and combat which he called spectacle. He made his life trajectory an incessant war against the society of his time, in which understood the advent of commodity occupying all aspects of life, human and social, and consequently making it the totalizing domain of quantitative, reducing it to a mere game of appearances. Thus, this dissertation seeks to understand the nature of Debord s theoretical-practice activity, in the avant-garde groups that he directed, through themes that permeated this groups activities and also his writings and films, deliberately chosen as a strategic means to attack and refute the illusions of the spectacular-mercantile-society. At the end of the dissertation is noted that the avant-garde conception and theory in Debord has the same meanings, both are temporary, they should be used as a practical-critique of the present time, in the opportune moment. It was observed also by analyzing the concept of separation that the commodity fetish and reification reach the paroxysm in the society of the spectacle, historic stage of capital reproduction in which social relations are mediated by images
A atividade prático-teórica de Guy Debord é marcada por uma estratégia de recusa e de combate ao que ele denominou espetáculo. Ele fez de sua trajetória de vida uma guerra incessante contra a sociedade de seu tempo, na qual compreendeu o advento da mercadoria ocupando todos os aspectos da vida, humana e social e, consequentemente, tornando-a objeto do domínio totalizante do quantitativo, reduzindo-a a um mero jogo de aparências. Destarte, esta dissertação busca compreender a natureza da atividade prático-teórica de Debord, nos grupos de vanguarda que dirigiu, através da análise de temas que permearam as atividades desses grupos e também seus escritos e filmes, deliberadamente usados como meio estratégico de atacar e refutar as ilusões da sociedade-espetacular-mercantil. Ao fim da dissertação nota-se que a concepção de vanguarda e de teoria em Debord possui os mesmos significados, ambas são passageiras, devem ser utilizadas, como crítica-prática do presente, na ocasião oportuna. Observou-se, também, através da análise do conceito de separação, que o fetiche da mercadoria e a reificação chegam ao paroxismo na sociedade do espetáculo, fase histórica de reprodução do capital em que as relações sociais são mediatizadas por imagens
Books on the topic "Guy debord"
Enrico, Ghezzi, and Knabb Ken, eds. Guy-Ernest Debord: Il cinema è morto. Ragusa: La fiaccola, 2005.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Guy debord"
Tambling, Jeremy. "Debord, Guy." In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Urban Literary Studies, 1–7. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62592-8_84-1.
Full textTambling, Jeremy. "Debord, Guy." In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Urban Literary Studies, 509–15. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62419-8_84.
Full textPenner, Devin. "6 Guy Debord and the Politics of Play." In Thinking Radical Democracy, edited by Martin Breaugh, Christopher Holman, Rachel Magnusson, Paul Mazzocchi, and Devin Penner, 165–86. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/9781442621992-008.
Full textDemichelis, Lelio. "From Guy Debord to Pulsive Integrated Techno-Capitalism." In Marx, Engels, and Marxisms, 151–70. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07385-4_6.
Full textHemmens, Alastair. "Guy Debord, the Situationist International and the Abolition of Alienated Labour." In The Critique of Work in Modern French Thought, 137–66. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12586-8_5.
Full textMesing, Dave. "3 Guy Debord." In Agamben's Philosophical Lineage, 39–50. Edinburgh University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9781474423656-005.
Full textTaylor, John. "Autobiography as Panegyric (Guy Debord)." In Paths to Contemporary French Literature, 257–60. Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315126104-51.
Full textKaufmann, Vincent. "Guy Debord: kein Recht auf Einsicht." In Intermediale Inszenierungen im Zeitalter der Digitalisierung, 115–28. transcript Verlag, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783839411919-006.
Full text"Guy Debord: kein Recht auf Einsicht." In Intermediale Inszenierungen im Zeitalter der Digitalisierung, 115–28. transcript-Verlag, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.14361/9783839411919-006.
Full textBeer, Susanne. "100. Guy Debord, La Société du Spectacle." In Schlüsselwerke der Kulturwissenschaften, 301–4. transcript Verlag, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783839413272-101.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Guy debord"
Motaianu, Mihaela, and Cornelia Motaianu. "Signs and Emotions as the Experience of the Urban Explorer." In World Lumen Congress 2021, May 26-30, 2021, Iasi, Romania. LUMEN Publishing House, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.18662/wlc2021/48.
Full textSerra Navarro, David. "Deriva y medios locativos: prácticas georeferenciadas." In III Congreso Internacional de Investigación en Artes Visuales :: ANIAV 2017 :: GLOCAL. Valencia: Universitat Politècnica València, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/aniav.2017.4801.
Full textIsmail, Mohd Izuddin Bin, Sunanda Magna Bela, Saharul Hashim, Khai Lun Tham, Cheol Hwan Roh, Siti Nur Mahirah Bt M Zain, Nur Hidayah M. Zamani, and Jagaan AL Selladurai. "7in Enhanced Single-Trip Multizone System ESTMZ: Fracturing Design, Execution and Operation Lessons Learnt in Highly Deviated Well with Nearby Shale, Coal and Water Contact." In Offshore Technology Conference Asia. OTC, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4043/31496-ms.
Full text