Academic literature on the topic 'Habermas´s theory of communicative action'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Habermas´s theory of communicative action.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Habermas´s theory of communicative action"
1
Aboh, Sopuruchi Christian, and Obiageli Chika Ezeudo. "Interactions on Facebook and Twitter: A Communicative Action Perspective." Theory and Practice in Language Studies 10, no. 11 (November 1, 2020): 1351. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1011.02.
Full textAbstract:
The study examines interactions on Facebook and Twitter from a communicative action perspective. The objectives of this study are to: identify the nature of action(s) by interlocutors on Facebook and Twitter and examine the world(s) portrayed by these interlocutors. The study adopts Habermas’ theory of communicative action to study the nature of actions and the three-world concept that exist among users of Facebook and Twitter. Insights from interpersonal pragmatics and politeness were also found useful in the analysis of data. A total number of 275 messages were used comprising five posts from Facebook with randomly selected 165 comments and three tweets with randomly selected 102 comments. The research observes that most participants on Facebook and Twitter acted or commented strategically in the sense that the stance they took were motivated by reasons and facts and not merely opinions or emotions. The findings also reveal that many interactants showed that they operate in the objective world by abiding by the social norms and facts.
2
Dahms, Harry F. "Theory in Weberian Marxism: Patterns of Critical Social Theory in Lukács and Habermas." Sociological Theory 15, no. 3 (November 1997): 181–214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00032.
Full textAbstract:
For Weberian Marxists, the social theories of Max Weber and Karl Marx are complementary contributions to the analysis of modern capitalist society. Combining Weber's theory of rationalization with Marx's critique of commodity fetishism to develop his own critique of reification, Georg Lukács contended that the combination of Marx's and Weber's social theories is essential to envisioning socially transformative modes of praxis in advanced capitalist society. By comparing Lukács ‘s theory of reification with Habermas's theory of communicative action as two theories in the tradition of Weberian Marxism, I show how the prevailing mode of “doing theory” has shifted from Marx's critique of economic determinism to Weber's idea of the inner logic of social value spheres. Today, Weberian Marxism can make an important contribution to theoretical sociology by reconstituting itself as a framework for critically examining prevailing societal definitions of the rationalization imperatives specific to purposive-rational social value spheres (the economy, the administrative state, etc.). In a second step, Weberian Marxists would explore how these value spheres relate to each other and to value spheres that are open to the type of communicative rationalization characteristic of the lifeworld level of social organization.
3
Ortega Esquembre, César. "Pragmática transcendental y filosofía social: Karl Otto Apel, Jürgen Habermas y la nueva fundamentación de la Teoría Crítica." Daímon, no. 78 (October 27, 2019): 155–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/daimon/366361.
Full textAbstract:
El objetivo de este artículo es defender que la pragmática transcendental ofrece la fundamentación normativa de la teoría crítica como teoría de la acción comunicativa. Para ello se expondrá en primer lugar el problema de la normatividad en la Teoría Crítica de la sociedad. Tras describir la forma que adquiere esta teoría tras el giro lingüístico operado por Jürgen Habermas, se reconstruirán en tercer lugar los elementos fundamentales de la pragmática transcendental apeliana y habermasiana. En cuarto y último lugar se mostrará que este modelo constituye la fundamentación normativa de la nueva teoría crítica. The aim of this paper is to argue that transcendental pragmatics constitutes the normative foundation of critical theory, understood as theory of communicative action. To that end, the issue of normativity within Critical Theory discussions is first exposed. After describing the form this theory takes from the linguistic turn carried out by Jürgen Habermas, key elements of Karl Otto Apel´s and Jürgen Habermas´ transcendental pragmatics are thirdly reconstructed. Fourth paragraph shows that this model operates as the normative foundation of the new critical theory.
4
Conill, Jesús. "Fenomenología lingüística y filosofía práctica para la paz en la trayectoria intelectual de Vicent Martínez Guzmán." Investigaciones Fenomenológicas, no. 16 (February 8, 2021): 179. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/rif.16.2019.29681.
Full textAbstract:
En este artículo expongo las tres etapas del pensamiento de Vicent Martínez Guzmán: 1) la fenomenología lingüística, primero en estrecha conexión con Fernando Montero y John L. Austin, y luego transformada por la pragmática trascendental (Apel) y la teoría de la acción comunicativa (Habermas); 2) la teoría filosófica de Europa, basada en Kant, Husserl, Ortega y Gasset y la Ética comunicativa o discursiva; y 3) la filosofía de la paz, que se convierte en una filosofía para hacer las paces, superando la violencia, la guerra y las injusticia: una investigación interdisciplinar basada en la intersubjetividad con sentido ético y político.In this paper I set forth the three stages of Vicent Martínez Guzmán’s thought: 1) the Linguistic Phenomenology, first closely connected with Fernando Montero and John L. Austin, but later transformed by the Transcendental Pragmatics (Apel) and the Theory of Communicative Action (Habermas); 2) the philosophical theory of Europe, based on Kant, Husserl, Ortega y Gasset and the communicative or discursive ethics; and 3) Philosophy of Peace that becomes in philosophy for making peace(s), overcoming violence, war and injustice: an interdisciplinary research based on intersubjectivity with ethical and political sense.
5
Venancio, Rafael Duarte Oliveira. "A lógica de ação social da Ferrari: Esporte, Consumo e Paixão na Scuderia do Cavallino Rampante." Revista Observatório 1, no. 3 (December 26, 2015): 221. http://dx.doi.org/10.20873/uft.2447-4266.2015v1n3p221.
Full textAbstract:
Paixão mundial seja nas pistas de corrida, seja nos carros de luxo ou mesmo em pequenos acessórios de consumo, a Scuderia Ferrari é uma das empresas mais tradicionais do esporte automotor e da indústria de carros com o seu vermelho vibrante de corrida (rosso corsa) e sua logomarca inconfundível de um cavalo rampante negro em um escudo de amarelo vibrante (cavallino rampante). O presente artigo deseja identificar a lógica de ação social que permite a empresa italiana, sediada em Maranello, tanto lucrar dentro do mecanismo econômico do capitalismo, bem como criar um fandom expressivo, cuja paixão não distingue classe social. Utilizando a lógica de racionalidade social posta por Jürgen Habermas, dividida em Mundo da Vida (ação comunicativa) e Sistema (ação instrumental), vamos esquematizar a ação ferrarista em quatro posições típica-ideais, mostrando a importância da gestão e do marketing esportivo e de bens de luxo para as empresas vinculadas ao automobilismo.PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Automobilismo, Marketing Esportivo, Mundo da Vida, Sistema, Scuderia Ferrari. ABSTRACTWorld passion whether on track, in luxury cars or even small accessories consumption, Scuderia Ferrari is one of the traditional businesses of motor sport and car industry with its vibrant red race (rosso corsa) and his unmistakable imprint of a black prancing horse on a vibrant yellow shield (cavallino rampant). This article want to identify social action logic that allows the Italian company, based in Maranello, both profit within the capitalist economic mechanism, as well as create a significant fandom, whose passion does not distinguish social class. Using social rationality logic brought by Jürgen Habermas, divided into World of Life (communicative action) and System (instrumental action), we lay out the Ferrari action in four typical-ideal positions, showing the importance of management and sports marketing and luxury goods for businesses linked to motoring.KEYWORDS: Auto Racing, Sports Marketing, World of Life System, Scuderia Ferrari. RESUMEN Pasión Mundial sea en automovilismo, en coches de lujo o en pequeño consumo de los accesorios, la Scuderia Ferrari es uno de los negocios tradicionales del deporte del motor y la industria del automóvil con su vibrante raza roja (rosso corsa) y su huella inconfundible de un caballo encabritado negro en un vibrante escudo amarillo (cavallino rampante). En este artículo se quiere identificar la lógica de la acción social que permite a la empresa italiana, con sede en Maranello, tanto el beneficio en el mecanismo económico capitalista, así como crear un fandom significativa, cuya pasión no distingue clases sociales. Utilizando la lógica racionalidad social presentada por Jürgen Habermas, dividido en Mundial de la Vida (acción comunicativa) y Sistema (acción instrumental), ponemos a cabo la acción de Ferrari en cuatro posiciones típicas ideales, que muestra la importancia de la gestión y el marketing deportivo y artículos de lujo para las empresas vinculadas al automovilismo.PALABRAS CLAVE: Automovilismo, marketing deportivo, Mundial de vida del sistema, la Scuderia Ferrari. ReferênciasADORNO, Theodor W. & HORKHEIMER, Max. Dialética do Esclarecimento (trad. Guido Antonio de Almeida). Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar Editor, 1985.AUSTIN, J. L. How to do Things with Words. Cambridge: HUP, 1975.BUCCI, Eugênio & VENANCIO, Rafael. D. O. "OValor de Gozo: um conceito para a crítica da indústria do imaginário". Matrizes. Ano 8. Nº 1. São Paulo: PPGCOM-ECA-USP, 2014.HABERMAS, Jürgen. Mudança Estrutural da Esfera Pública (trad. Flávio R. Kothe). Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro, 1984.HABERMAS, Jürgen. The Theory of Communicative Action (dois vol.). Boston: Beacon, 1989.HABERMAS, Jürgen. "Progresso técnico e mundo social da vida". In: HABERMAS, Jürgen. Técnica e ciência como "ideologia" (trad. Artur Morão). Lisboa: Ed. 70, 2001a.HABERMAS, Jürgen. "Técnica e ciência como ‘ideologia'". In: HABERMAS, Jürgen. Técnica e ciência como "ideologia" (trad. Artur Morão). Lisboa: Ed. 70, 2001b.HABERMAS, Jürgen. A Ética da Discussão e a Questão da Verdade (trad. Marcelo B. Cipolla). São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2004.HORKHEIMER, Max. "Teoria Tradicional e Teoria Crítica". In: HORKHEIMER, Max et alli. Os pensadores. São Paulo: Abril Cultural, 1980.KINGSTON, Lewis. "Ferrari is ‘world's most powerful brand'". Autocar.co.uk., 2013. Disponível em: http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/industry/ferrari-world-s-most-powerful-brand.LOVEJOY, Arthur O. A Grande Cadeia do Ser. São Paulo: Palíndromo, 2005.MAINGUENEAU, Dominique. Termos-chave da Análise do Discurso. Belo Horizonte: Ed. UFMG, 2006.MANTON, David. Enzo Ferrari's Secret War. Bridgehampton: BPL, 2011.MORIN, Edgar. Cultura de Massas no Século XX - O Espírito do Tempo. R. J.: Forense, 1967.MORIN, Edgar. Cultura de Massas no Século XX - O Espírito do Tempo: volume II (Necrose). Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 1977.NOBRE, Marcos. Lukács e os limites da reificação. São Paulo: Ed. 34, 2001.NOBRE, Marcos. A Teoria Crítica. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar Editor, 2004.SANTOS, Francisco (ed.) Grand Prix. Lisboa: Público, 2003.SKINNER, Quentin. "Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas". History and Theory. Vol. 8, nº 1. Middleton: Wesleyan University, 1969.SKINNER, Quentin. "Conventions and the Undestanding of Speech Acts". The Philosophical Quaterly. Vol. 20, nº79. Saint Andrews: St. Andrews, 1970.SKINNER, Quentin. "On Performing and Explaing Linguistic Actions". The Philosophical Quaterly. Vol. 21, nº82. Saint Andrews: St. Andrews, 1971.SKINNER, Quentin. "Motives, Intentions and the Interpretation of Texts". New Literary History. Vol. 3, nº 2. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins, 1972.SKINNER, Quentin."Hermeneutics and the Role of History". New Literary History. Vol. 7, nº 1. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins, 1975.SKINNER, Quentin. Razão e Retórica na Filosofia de Hobbes. São Paulo: Unesp, 1999.SKINNER, Quentin. Visions of Politics: Regarding Method. Cambridge: CUP, 2002.VENANCIO, Rafael D. O. "Radiojornalismo ativista: um modelo de ação para o jornalismo alternativo". Revista Alterjor. Vol. 2, nº 6. São Paulo: ALTERJOR-ECA-USP, 2012.WRIGHT MILLS, C. A Elite do Poder. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 1981. Disponível em:Url: http://opendepot.org/2707/ Abrir em (para melhor visualização em dispositivos móveis - Formato Flipbooks):Issuu / Calameo
6
Powell, Jason L. "Modernity, Communicative Action and Reconstruction of Rationality." International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 27 (May 2014): 177–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ilshs.27.177.
Full textAbstract:
Associated with the Frankfurt School, Jurgen Habermas's work focuses on the modern foundations of social theory and epistemology, the analysis of advanced capitalistic societies and democracy, the rule of law in a critical social-evolutionary context, and contemporary politics, particularly German politics. Habermas's theoretical system is devoted to revealing the possibility of reason, emancipation, and rational-critical communication latent in modern institutions and in the human capacity to deliberate and pursue rational interests. Habermas is known for his work on the concept of modernity, particularly with respect to the discussions of rationalization originally set forth by Max Weber. He has been influenced by American pragmatism and action theory. This paper sets out to explore the problems and possibilities of communicative action and the reconstruction of rationality which Habermas claims was lost in postmodern genre.
7
Schaefer, Michael, Hans-Jochen Heinze, Michael Rotte, and Claudia Denke. "Communicative versus Strategic Rationality: Habermas Theory of Communicative Action and the Social Brain." PLoS ONE 8, no. 5 (May 29, 2013): e65111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065111.
Full text
8
Miedema, Siebren. "The relevance for pedagogy of Habermas' ?Theory of Communicative Action?" Interchange 25, no. 2 (April 1994): 195–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01534545.
Full text
9
Haacke, Jürgen. "The Frankfurt School and International Relations' on the centrality of recognition." Review of International Studies 31, no. 1 (January 2005): 181–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0260210505006376.
Full textAbstract:
The works of Jürgen Habermas have amounted to an inspiration to many within IR. His writings on communicative rationality and communicative action are widely regarded as a useful counterpoint to the emphasis on instrumental rationality and strategic action. Also, Habermas has greatly influenced the development of Critical International Theory. However, as other contributions in this Forum demonstrate, IR scholars have at times found it difficult to apply Habermas to service their specific social scientific inquiries. In particular, it has been difficult to unequivocally locate communicative action in diplomatic exchanges or international negotiations. It is partly for this reason that the contributions of the so-called ‘Third Generation’ of Frankfurt School scholars have attracted increasing interest. Axel Honneth's attempts to reconstruct insights in relation to the struggle for recognition into a social theory (with critical intent) have to date been of particular importance in this context. Indeed, given the perceived difficulties in ‘applying’ Habermas, there appears to be an emerging trend to end the honeymoon with Habermas in favour of a reorientation toward Honneth.
10
Rochberg-Halton, Eugene. "Jürgen Habermas's Theory of Communicative Etherealization:The Theory of Cornmunicative Action, Jiirgen Habermas." Symbolic Interaction 12, no. 2 (November 1989): 333–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/si.1989.12.2.333.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Habermas´s theory of communicative action"
1
Croona, Gill. "Etik och utmaning. : Om lärande av bemötande i professionsutbildning." Doctoral thesis, Växjö universitet, Institutionen för pedagogik, 2003. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:vxu:diva-385.
Full textAbstract:
During recent years there have been noticeable shortcomings in the human encounter of people seeking some form of health care in Sweden. This is something that affects professional education within ‘the welfare state’ and implies that human expectations, societal demands and questions about knowledge, basic values and competence have become pedagogically interesting. The basic aim of the dissertation is - to contribute to a practically, relevant and theoretical in-depth understanding of the learning and teaching of ethics in professional education. By taking nursing education as an example and focussing on the human encounter of the person seeking care, the dissertation aims - by analysis of the pedagogic practice and from a critical-theoretical perspective – to provide a foundation for such an understanding. The research perspective includes a social-philosophical point of departure with a focus on Mead’s interactional view of learning and Habermas’s critical theory of social communication. Methodologically an emphasis is placed on discourse analysis. The results demonstrate how the learning and teaching of ethics in human encounters can be understood as a question of communication of both knowledge and values. In the theoretical reconstruction that follows it is shown how pedagogic actions, learning and competence can be understood as communication of and in particular contextual discourses. The six discourses are: ‘the efficiency-related discourse’, ‘the expert-related discourse’, the ‘care-related discourse’, ‘the communicative-related discourse’, ‘the egocentric discourse’ and ‘the ethnocentric discourse’, all of which are mutually related to each other. The contextual discourses focus on different values. Those that are most conducive to creating pleasant human encounters are the communicative- and the care-related discourses, which also form the foundation for the pedagogic recommendation that makes up the concluding discussion of the dissertation. The recommendation concerns a pedagogical practice that affirms, pays attention to, safeguards and challenges and thus generates creativity, as well as the legitimacy of pluralism. To engage in stimulating pedagogical discussion means being committed, taking responsibility and practicing solidarity in the profession of education. Such a ‘deliberative pedagogy’ creates possibilities for people to develop solidarity of judgement in a society that increasingly demanding that. In conclusion, the recommendation for a new and challenging human encounter-ethical-pedagogy is intended to show that ‘ideals can be realistic’. Normative recommendations do not have to be abstract visions of the future, but can be looked upon as means of focussing on alternative actions, that despite the difficulties are possible to realise – here and now.
2
Mesbah, Ali. "Religion, rationality, and language : a critical analysis of Jürgen Habermas' theory of communicative action." Thesis, McGill University, 2002. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=82933.
Full textAbstract:
Jurgen Habermas is a second-generation social philosopher of the Frankfurt school, the birthplace of critical theory. He suggests that modernity is a project of substituting rationality for religion. In his analysis, such a succession is the result of a process of social evolution, in which each developmental stage has its basic concepts and modes of understanding subjective, objective, and social worlds. For him, the salient feature of rationality consists of differentiation between various validity claims of truth, truthfulness, and sincerity which are indistinguishable in religious language. The rationalization of religion, hence, progresses in terms of a differentiation between validity claims, a decentration of human understanding, the disenchantment of the world, and the linguistification of the sacred. Habermas proposes a universal pragmatics in which two modes of language use are separated: instrumental-strategic, and communicative. He thinks that the failure of the enlightenment movement to replace religion with reason stems from its preoccupation with instrumental reason and language use, dispensing with communicative rationality; and the remedy lies in communicative rationality.Critically analyzing Habermas' theory of communicative action, this study examines Habermas' basic idea of substituting communicative rationality for religion in the light of his critique of Max Weber and of instrumental reason. Ontological, epistemological, methodological, and conceptual presuppositions in his argument are discussed and evaluated.
3
Travers, Ann. "The invisible woman : a feminist critique of Habermas's theory of communicative action." Thesis, University of British Columbia, 1990. http://hdl.handle.net/2429/29857.
Full textAbstract:
Feminist theory is a vast area of discourse and, while the differences between the many tendencies are extremely interesting, it is beyond the scope of this thesis to engage in such an inquiry. I have chosen to conduct a critique of Habermas's theory of communicative action from a perspective informed for the most part by postmodern/poststructural feminism. I hope that my reasons for working within such a framework will become evident in the following chapters but, in my view, a postmodern/poststructural feminist perspective sharpens the critique of Habermas's theory precisely because it stands in such contrast to it.
For the purposes of this thesis, my critique will focus upon Habermas's most recent work - The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume I: Reason and the Rationalization of Society (1984), and Volume II: The Critique of Functionalist Reason (1987). Other works by Habermas will not be specifically addressed although references will be made to them as necessary to clarify his positions on various issues.Arts, Faculty of
Sociology, Department of
Graduate
4
Piscioneri, Matthew. "The Myth of reason : a study of Jürgen Habermas's Theory of Communicative Action/." [St. Lucia, Qld.], 2004. http://www.library.uq.edu.au/pdfserve.php?image=thesisabs/absthe18116.pdf.
Full text
5
Lipscomb, Michael E. "The theory of communicative action and the aesthetic moment : Habermas and the (neo)Nietzschean challenge /." Thesis, This resource online, 1996. http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-01312009-063033/.
Full text
6
FILHO, JOÃO DE AMARAL. "THE THEORY OF COMMUNICATIVE ACTION HABERMAS AS THE FOUNDATION OF NORMATIVE VALIDITY OF COLLECTIVE LABOR NEGOTIATIONS." PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DO RIO DE JANEIRO, 2014. http://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/Busca_etds.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=27859@1.
Full textAbstract:
PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DO RIO DE JANEIROCom a modernidade em crise, a crítica aos ideais iluministas e até da noção tradicional da razão em cheque, passou-se a buscar uma melhor compreensão da realidade, como alternativa para suprir um crescente descontentamento social em função do distanciamento entre as decisões administrativas, incluindo as judiciais, e os efetivos anseios dos cidadãos. Dentre as propostas que aliam o novo ideal democrático ao contexto do mundo da vida, o filósofo alemão Jürgen Habermas propõe uma mudança de paradigma da Razão através de uma lógica dialógica, transferindo a noção da Razão Prática para um espectro procedimental, usando como ferramenta indispensável o agir comunicativo, o discurso e o consenso entre as partes interessadas; além disso, promove uma reconstrução do direito e do Estado, com a superação dos modelos teóricos existentes – liberal e republicano – e com a formatação de um Estado efetivamente democrático, posto que viabiliza a participação dos concernidos na criação dos direitos. Em outras palavras, Habermas aposta no sucesso processo de interação comunicativa, que se efetiva por meio de um acordo discutido, debatido e refletido em função dos motivos apresentados pelos interessados. Diante dessa linha habermasiana que envolve a atuação efetiva dos cidadãos e das instituições da sociedade civil, além do próprio Estado, no processo de formulação normativa e decisória surge, para alguns, a ideia da inaplicabilidade dessa teoria por entenderem que, em função da realidade brasileira, principalmente em relação ao déficit educacional da população, essa ideia ficaria prejudicada. O Direito Coletivo do Trabalho, como ramificação de nosso sistema jurídico, promove a derrocada dessa premissa de inaplicabilidade da proposta de Habermas que adota o agir comunicativo como instrumento para alcance do entendimento, do consenso dos interessados, promovendo, assim, uma harmônica relação entre a validade e faticidade da norma. Importante ainda ressaltar a convivência dos interesses individuais e dos coletivos, não havendo prevalência da simples vontade da maioria, mas sim da vontade melhor justificada dentro do processo dialógico, ocorrendo a preservação das garantias e direitos individuais fundamentais.
With modernity in crisis, criticizes the Enlightenment ideals and even the traditional notion of reason in check, began to seek a better understanding of reality, as an alternative to supply a growing social discontent due to the distance between the adminstrative decisions, including judicial, and actual desires of citizens. Among the proposals that combine the new democratic ideal context of the living world, the German philosopher Jurgen Habermas proposes a paradigm shift of Reason through a dialogical logic, transferring the notion of Practical Reason for a procedural spectrum, using as the indispensable tool communicative action, discourse and consensus among stakeholders; Moreover, it promotes a reconstruction of law and state, with the overcoming of the existing theoretical models - liberal and republican - and the formatting of a democratic state effectively, since it enables the participation of concerned in the creation of rights. In other words, Habermas betting on the success of the process, which is effective communicative interaction through an agreement discussed, debated and reflected on the basis of the reasons given by those concerned. Given this Habermasian line that involves the effective participation of citizens and civil society institutions, and the state itself, the formulation of rules and decision-making process arises, for some, the idea of this theory inapplicable because they understand that, according to the Brazilian reality mainly in relation to the educational deficit of the population, this idea would be impaired. The Collective Labour Law, as a branch of our legal system, promotes the overthrow of this premise inapplicability of proposed which adopts Habermas communicative action as an instrument to reach understanding, consensus of stakeholders, thus promoting a harmonious relationship between the validity and facticity of the norm. Important to highlight the coexistence of individual and collective interests, with no prevalence of simple will of the majority, but the best justified within the dialogical process will occur and guarantees the preservation of fundamental individual rights.
7
Sotomayor, Enrique. "Habermas against Hyperrationalism." Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2014. http://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/119253.
Full textAbstract:
This paper presents a revision of the way in which Jürgen Habermas returns to the critical tradition of Marxism regarding the topic of ideology. After the characterization of Habermasian thinking regarding the progress of instrumental rationality (at the expense of communicative reason) it confronts the debate between Habermas and Niklas Luhmann within German Social Theory. Finally, the third section focuses on showing the differences regarding the conception of the place of law in society, based on the theoretical frameworks of Habermas and Luhmann.El presente trabajo plantea una revisión de la forma en que Jürgen Habermas retoma la tradición crítica del marxismo respecto del tópico de la ideología. Luego y a partir de la caracterización del pensamiento de Habermas respecto del avance de la racionalidad instrumental (en detrimento de la razón comunicativa) afrontaremos el debate que han sostenido Habermas y Niklas Luhmann en el seno de la Teoría social alemana. Finalmente, la tercera sección se centra en mostrar las diferencias en la concepción sobre el lugar del derecho en la sociedad, a partir de los marcos teóricos de Habermas y Luhmann.
8
Almujaibel, Naser Bader. "CHANGING A SYSTEM FROM WITHIN: APPLYING THE THEORY OF COMMUNICATIVE ACTION FOR FUNDAMENTAL POLICY CHANGES IN KUWAIT." Diss., Temple University Libraries, 2018. http://cdm16002.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p245801coll10/id/508399.
Full textAbstract:
Media & CommunicationPh.D.
Political legitimacy is a fundamental problem in the modern state. According to Habermas (1973), current legitimation methods are losing the sufficiency needed to support political systems and decisions. In response, Habermas (1987) developed the theory of communicative action as a new method for establishing political legitimacy. The current study applies the communicative action theory to Kuwait’s current political transformation. This study addresses the nature of the foundation of Kuwait, the regional situation, the internal political context, and the current economic challenges. The specific political transformation examined in this study is a national development project known as Vision of 2035 supported by the Amir as the head of the state. The project aims to develop a third of Kuwait’s land and five islands as special economic zones (SEZ). The project requires new legislation that would fundamentally change the political and economic identity of the country. The study applies the communicative action theory in order to achieve a mutual understanding between different groups in Kuwait regarding the project’s features and the legislation required to achieve them.
Temple University--Theses
9
Souza, Tulio Augustus Silva e. "O comunicado da razão: crítica da razão funcionalista na Teoria do Agir Comunicativo." Universidade de São Paulo, 2013. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/8/8132/tde-30102013-124407/.
Full textAbstract:
O objetivo desse trabalho é rastrear a dimensão de influências específicas que moldaram Jürgen Habermas na construção da Teoria do Agir Comunicativo. Em sua obra maior, a pretensão habermasiana foi harmonizar um vasto leque de autores e teorias que uma vez trabalhados em suas especificidades convergissem para a existência de um projeto emancipador possibilitado por uma racionalidade de teor comunicativo. Com esse propósito, a atenção está voltada para o segundo volume dessa obra, em especial para o papel de Talcott Parsons e sua teoria de sistemas, a sociologia de Émile Durkheim que faculta a interação por meio da linguagem e seu entrelaçamento com Habermas por mais de uma via, as discussões metodológicas com Popper e a disputa com o positivismo, bem como a presença da teoria crítica e seus personagens diversos.The aim of this work is to track the size of specific influences that shaped Jürgen Habermas in the construction of the Theory of Communicative Action. In his major work, the habermasion intention was to harmonize a wide range of authors and theories that treated in their particularity would be able to converge to an emancipatory project made possible by a rationality of communicative content. For this purpose, the attention is focused on the second volume of this work, especially on the role of Talcott Parsons and his systems theory, on the sociology of Émile Durkheim that provides interaction through language and its relationship with Habermas through several ways, on the methodological discussions with Popper and the dispute with positivism, and on the presence of critical theory and its many characters.
10
Assencio, Sandro. "Comunicação e cultura: os pressupostos da \"guinada linguístico-pragmática\" da teoria do agir comunicativo de Jürgen Habermas." Universidade de São Paulo, 2013. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/27/27154/tde-19092013-102433/.
Full textAbstract:
O objeto da presente pesquisa constitui-se na análise imanente dos pressupostos da \"guinada linguístico-pragmática\" de Jürgen Habermas verificada no interior de sua magnum opus - a Teoria do agir comunicativo, publicada em 1981. O objetivo a que nos propusemos alcançar é a elucidação do modo peculiar como Habermas absorve as aquisições teóricas da pragmática linguística (em especial J. L. Austin e J. R. Searle) visando a construção de sua teoria da comunicação, cujo ponto central é a postulação do consenso entre sujeitos capazes de linguagem e ação como o \"fim último\" ou télos do agir comunicativo. A hipótese teórica - ou de trabalho -, que acreditamos ter sido confirmada ao longo de nossa pesquisa, é a de que Habermas, mesmo sendo um árduo defensor da razão e do \"projeto da modernidade\", compartilha ponto comum com os pensadores do período que se convencionou designar pós-modernidade: o chamado \"idealismo linguístico\", isto é, apreensão dos atos comunicativos como entidades autônomas, porque separados das relações materiais e sociais dos homens.The object of this research is the immanent analysis of the Jürgen Habermas \"linguistic-pragmatic turn\" presuppositions, verified in his magnum opus - The Theory of Communicative Action, published in 1981. The goal we set ourselves to achieve is to elucidate the peculiar way as Habermas absorbs the theoretical acquisitions of linguistic pragmatics (especially J. L. Austin and J. R. Searle) for the construction of a theory of communication, whose focal point is the postulation of consensus between subjects capable of speech and action as the telos of communicative action. The theoretical hypothesis that we believe have been confirmed throughout our research is that Habermas, despite being a vehement defender of reason and the \"Project of modernity\", shares common ground with the thinkers of that period is conventionally designate postmodernity: the so-called \"linguistic idealism\", i. e. the seizure of communicative acts as autonomous entities, because separed of socials and materials relations of men
Books on the topic "Habermas´s theory of communicative action"
1
Brand, Arie. The force of reason: An introduction to Habermas' Theory of communicative action. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin, 1990.
Find full text
2
The force of reason: An introduction to Habermas' Theory of communicative action. Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 1990.
Find full text
3
Baynes, Kenneth. 31. Habermas. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198708926.003.0031.
Full textAbstract:
This chapter examines Jürgen Habermas's major contributions to social and political thought. Habermas is regarded as one of the most influential figures in contemporary political theory. In his later work Habermas has begun to expand the normative political implications of his work in social theory and philosophy, culminating in Between Facts and Norms. This chapter first provides an overview of Habermas's earlier work, especially his study on the transformation of the liberal or bourgeois public sphere, before discussing his theory of communicative action (or action based on mutually supposed validity claims). It then considers Habermas's attempt, in Between Facts and Norms, to develop an account of deliberative politics anchored on the idea of political legitimacy and concludes with an analysis of cosmopolitanism as well as his views on discourse theory, democracy, the system of rights, and ‘weak’ and ‘strong’ publics.
Book chapters on the topic "Habermas´s theory of communicative action"
1
Roderick, Rick. "Habermas on Communicative Action and Rationality." In Habermas and the Foundations of Critical Theory, 106–36. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18149-0_4.
Full text
2
Clarke, Simon. "Jurgen Habermas: Self Reflection, Rationality and Communicative Action." In From Enlightenment to Risk: Social Theory and Contemporary Society, 60–83. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-07500-0_4.
Full text
3
Lemaître, Christian, and Amal El Fallah-Seghrouchni. "A Multiagent Systems Theory of Meaning Based on the Habermas/ Bühler Communicative Action Theory." In Advances in Artificial Intelligence, 116–25. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44399-1_13.
Full text
4
"The theory of communicative action." In Habermas, 50–74. Routledge, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203020166-6.
Full text
5
"The theory of communicative action." In The Philosophy of Habermas, 138–87. Acumen Publishing Limited, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/upo9781844653539.007.
Full text
6
"The theory of communicative action." In The Philosophy of Habermas, 138–87. Routledge, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315710495-5.
Full text
7
"Basic Concepts in Habermas's Theory of Communicative Action." In Habermas, 9–59. Stanford University Press, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9780804769129.003.0002.
Full text
8
"1. Basic Concepts in Habermas’s: Theory of Communicative Action." In Habermas, 9–59. Stanford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9780804777810-003.
Full text
9
"Three The Theory of Communicative Action: Habermas’s model of a critical social science." In Habermas, 63–97. Routledge, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315696423-9.
Full text
10
"35. The Theory of Society: The Theory of Communicative Action (1981): A Classic of Social Theory." In The Habermas Handbook, 360–82. Columbia University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.7312/brun16642-037.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Habermas´s theory of communicative action"
1
Somova, Oksana, and Pavel Vladimirov. "The problem of intersubjectivity in Western philosophy: Boundaries of the communicative approach." In 6th International e-Conference on Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences. Center for Open Access in Science, Belgrade, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.32591/coas.e-conf.06.08095s.
Full textAbstract:
The article defines the meaning of the phenomenological approach to the analysis of the concept of intersubjectivity in the context of social and philosophical problems of the balance of the Self and the Other. The discourse is based on the correlation of phenomenological orientation and communicative action in determining the mechanisms of identity of the Self in relation to the Other in the inseparability of social reality. A sequential analysis of prerequisites and research approaches aimed at testing the problem of intersubjectivity is carried out. The focus is placed on social phenomenological research of A. Schutz and the theory of communicative action of J. Habermas, which are aimed at understanding the correlation between the peculiarities of human existence, his life-world and the area of social relations or the inevitability of establishing overindividual patterns. Relevance of the research lies in elaborating the issue of establishing intersubjectivity under the fundamental non-identity of the subjects of communication and their predetermined attitudes. The article concludes by outlining the feasibility of expanding the rational predetermination of the subject-subjective structure of communicative action with the research area of social phenomenology.
2
Somova, Oksana, and Pavel Vladimirov. "The problem of intersubjectivity in Western philosophy: Boundaries of the communicative approach." In 6th International e-Conference on Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences. Center for Open Access in Science, Belgrade, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.32591/coas.e-conf.06.08095s.
Full textAbstract:
The article defines the meaning of the phenomenological approach to the analysis of the concept of intersubjectivity in the context of social and philosophical problems of the balance of the Self and the Other. The discourse is based on the correlation of phenomenological orientation and communicative action in determining the mechanisms of identity of the Self in relation to the Other in the inseparability of social reality. A sequential analysis of prerequisites and research approaches aimed at testing the problem of intersubjectivity is carried out. The focus is placed on social phenomenological research of A. Schutz and the theory of communicative action of J. Habermas, which are aimed at understanding the correlation between the peculiarities of human existence, his life-world and the area of social relations or the inevitability of establishing overindividual patterns. Relevance of the research lies in elaborating the issue of establishing intersubjectivity under the fundamental non-identity of the subjects of communication and their predetermined attitudes. The article concludes by outlining the feasibility of expanding the rational predetermination of the subject-subjective structure of communicative action with the research area of social phenomenology.