Journal articles on the topic 'Hakka speakers'

Hakka Chinese is also known in China as Kejia dialect. The present study is based on phonetic data collected from native speakers of Hakka Chinese, male and female, aged between 18 and 22, during our field trips to Hakka-speaking Meixian County in the northeastern part of Guangdong Province in southeastern China in 2007. The speakers have lived all their life in Meijiang District of the county, speaking Meijiang variety which is considered representative of Meixian Hakka. The style of speech illustrated here is that typical of the educated younger generation and the recording is that of a 22-year-old male college student.

Abstract This paper examines the language practices among speakers of Hakka in Hong Kong, a minority Chinese variety still found in the territory. These speakers were largely monolingual a few decades ago but are now primarily bilingual in Hakka and Cantonese as the community shifts towards the latter, the dominant societal language. To explore the process and dynamics of this language shift, the present study adopted an ethnographic approach for observing the actual bilingual behaviours of individuals and families in the community. The informant sample comprised 32 speakers aged between 9 and 82 from nine separate families across Hong Kong. Data was collected through a combination of participant observation, informal interviews and conversational exchanges in the informants’ homes. Examination of their patterns of language choice and language use shows that most of the speakers use Cantonese-dominant patterns, and are ‘shifters’ rather than ‘maintainers’ of the Hakka language; the shift is clearly generation and age-related. The paper also illustrates how bilingual speakers make use of code-switching between Hakka and Cantonese to achieve various discourse purposes in their everyday conversations, suggesting that even among the ‘language shifters’, Hakka remains an important linguistic resource.

AbstractBackgroundIn the multilingual situation of Malaysia, standard languages and spoken vernaculars are interacting in intricate ways whereby various spoken languages share a pool of words from Malay, English and Mandarin. Structurally, all languages converge and influence the spoken varieties of the standard languages.Material and methodThis contribution observes the situation from the viewpoint of Hakka speakers. In an analysis of the communicative practices in an extended Hakka family and their non-Hakka friends, the interactions of the various languages in borrowing and code-switching have been analysed and later discussed with speakers. It is expected that standard languages influence language use over time.AnalysisThe adult generations of the family speak Hakka and effortlessly mix with other languages. Intergenerationally, language change (and possibly language loss) can be observed for Hakka. Mandarin is gaining importance for all speakers. At the same time, loanwords and loan translations from Malaysian, English and Mandarin are frequent. This Malaysian vocabulary is shared by all spoken languages, with only few differences in usage. Standard Chinese is gradually replacing old Hakka words in Hakka.ConclusionsAs can be expected, the spoken languages such as Hakka are quickly losing traditional lexemes and phrases, while Mandarin Chinese as well as English and Malaysian words are used in Hakka; at the same time, spoken Mandarin and spoken English converges structurally with the substratic Chinese dialects.

Xunwu Diaocha (Report from Xunwu) by Mao Zedong was abundant in original material and local people’s language and characterized by the Hakka culture, including the local Hakka dialect and vernacular, social customs, foods and tools, and other aspects. This makes it difficult for non-Hakka Chinese to understand its contents, let alone English speakers who know nothing about Hakka. In attempting to make the translation smoothly understood by English speakers while not losing the Hakka flavor, American translator Roger Thompson has done a good job. By comparing Xunwu Diaocha (the original) with its English version Report from Xunwu translated by Roger R. Thompson, this paper analyzes the English expressions of the Hakka culture and discovers four translation strategies that the translator has adopted to achieve the goal of cultural representation. The strategies are Chinese Pinyin plus explanation, literal translation plus explanation, free translation plus Chinese Pinyin, and free translation plus explanation. The study reveals that through the above-mentioned strategies, the translation has well represented the Hakka culture and realizes cultural representation in its translation. Hopefully the strategies employed to represent the Hakka culture can serve as solid guidance for translations of other texts involving rich cultures.

This research is based on a theory in Historical Comparative Linguistics. This theory is also called a diachronic theory, which involves the analysis of the form and regularity of changes in common languages such as those accompanied by sound changes. The objects of the research are Teochew (TC), Hakka (HK), and Cantonese (CO) dialects used in Medan city. These three dialects are categorized into the Sino-Tibetan family. Sino-Tibetan (ST) as one of the largest language families in the world, with more first-language speakers than even Indo-Europeans, is having more than 1.1 billion speakers of Sinitic (the Chinese dialects) constitute the world's largest speech community. According to STEDT (Sino-Tibetan Etymological Dictionary and Thesaurus), Chinese is considered as a Sino-Tibetan language family. The research method used is the qualitative method. The data collection method and technique used to refer to the conversation method with the techniques of recording and writing. The data were analyzed using the qualitative method of glottochronology. The result of the research shows that TC, HK, and CO were related in terms of sound correspondences and were separated thousands of years ago. TC and HK were related and both corresponded identically one similar vowel, one similar consonant, and one different phoneme, and one similar syllable. TC and CO were related and both corresponded to one similar vowel, one similar vocalic cluster, one similar consonant, and one different phoneme, and one similar syllable. HK and CO were related and both corresponded identically, one similar vowel, one similar consonant, one different phoneme, one different vocalic cluster, and one similar syllable. From all the findings and discussion in this research, the writer has concluded that HK and CO are the closest dialects among the three compared dialects.

Introduction: MAVORIC was an open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 3 study evaluating the safety and efficacy of mogamulizumab (moga) compared to vorinostat (vori) in patients with mycosis fungoides (MF) or Sézary syndrome (SS) who had failed at least one prior course of systemic therapy (NCT01728805). Primary results have been reported (Kim et al. Lancet Oncol 2018) and were based on a data cutoff date of December 31, 2016. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); patients in the moga treatment arm experienced significantly longer PFS compared to patients in the vori treatment arm (median 7.7 months vs 3.1 months; p<0.0001). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of any cause or grade reported in patients randomized to moga were: infusion-related reaction (33.2%), drug eruption (ie, skin rash attributed to moga [23.9%]), diarrhea (23.4%), and fatigue (23.4%). This report provides the final safety results of MAVORIC as of the data available on January 3, 2019. Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 to moga 1.0 mg/kg administered intravenously on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of the first cycle and on Days 1 and 15 of subsequent cycles or vori 400 mg administered orally once daily. Patients randomized to vori were allowed to cross over to moga upon progression or intolerable toxicity. Safety was assessed by reported adverse events (AEs), changes in physical examinations, vital sign measurements, electrocardiograms, and laboratory analyses. Results: In total, 372 patients were randomized (moga, 186; vori, 186), of whom 370 received study drug and were included in the safety analysis (moga, 184; vori, 186). For the final safety analysis, median duration of follow-up was 34.5 months (range, 0.13-70.0) in the randomized part of the study. Median treatment exposure was 170 days (range, 1-1813) for moga and 84 days (4-1230) for vori, which represent the same median values but broader ranges compared to the primary analysis (primary analysis, 170 days [1-1379] for moga and 84 days [4-1058] for vori). The type and frequency of AEs in either the moga or vori treatment groups (Table) were consistent with those reported in the primary analysis. TEAEs, regardless of causality, that were reported at similar rates in the two treatment groups included constipation, peripheral edema, headache, and anemia. TEAEs (all causality) that occurred at higher frequency in the moga vs vori arm included infusion-related reaction (33.2% vs 0.5%) and drug eruption (25.0% vs 1.1%); the majority of these events were grade 1 or 2 (Table). The types and frequencies of AEs attributable to moga (per Investigator assessment) included infusion-related reaction (33.2% [61/184]), drug eruption (23.9% [44/184]), and fatigue (18.5% [34/184]), and for vori, diarrhea (55.4% [103/186]), nausea (38.2% [71/186]), and fatigue (33.3% [62/186]). In patients who crossed over from the vori to moga arm and received study drug (n=135), the most frequently reported AEs attributable to moga were infusion-related reaction (37.8% [51/135]), drug eruption (24.4% [33/135]), fatigue (7.4% [10/135]), increased alanine aminotransferase (7.4% [10/135]), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (7.4% [10/135]). Discontinuation rates due to AEs were similar between treatment arms and in crossover patients (moga, 21.7% [40/184]; vori, 23.7% [44/186]; crossover, 25.9% [35/135]). The most common AEs leading to discontinuation were drug eruption in the moga arm (7.1% [13/184]) and fatigue in the vori arm (4.3% [8/186]). Overall, the rates of drug-related serious TEAEs were similar between treatment arms and in crossover patients (moga, 19.6% [36/184]; vori, 16.7% [31/186]; crossover, 11.9% [16/135]). After the data cutoff for the primary analysis, 1 additional patient randomized to moga (decreased appetite, general physical health deterioration, hypoalbuminemia) and 1 crossover patient (cerebral hemorrhage) experienced TEAEs with an outcome of death, all considered unrelated to study treatment per Investigator. Conclusions: This final safety analysis from the MAVORIC study in patients with previously treated MF and SS demonstrates that moga was generally well tolerated. Longer follow-up and treatment exposure did not identify any new safety signals. The type and incidence of treatment-related AEs among patients receiving moga after crossover were similar to those observed for patients initially randomized to moga. Disclosures Kim: Merck: Research Funding; Portola Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Horizon: Research Funding; Corvus: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Galderma: Research Funding; Elorac: Research Funding; Soligenix: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Eisai: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Forty Seven Inc: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Medivir: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Innate Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Neumedicine: Research Funding; miRagen: Research Funding. Bagot:Innate Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Zinzani:MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Eusapharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy; Celltrion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Immune Design: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Portola: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Kirin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Verastem: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Duvic:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; Shape: Research Funding; UT MD Anderson Cancer Center: Employment; USCLC Registry: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Secretary/treasurer of Item h; Spatz Foundation: Research Funding; Tetralogic: Research Funding; Millennium (formerly Takeda): Research Funding; Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals (formeraly Therakos, Inc): Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Forty Seven Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cutaneous Lymphoma Foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PleXus Communications: Speakers Bureau; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; Evidera, Inc.: Consultancy; Cell Medica Inc.: Consultancy; Allos: Research Funding; Rhizen Pharma: Research Funding; Oncoceuticals: Research Funding; Soligenetics: Research Funding; Cell Medica Ltd.: Honoraria; Therakos: Speakers Bureau; Jonathan Wood & Assoc.: Speakers Bureau; Hawaiian Dermatology Society: Speakers Bureau; Hemedicus: Speakers Bureau; Janssen Pharmaceuticals (div of Johnson & Johnson): Speakers Bureau. Morris:Guys Hospital: Employment. Kim:Medimmune: Research Funding; Soligenix: Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Research Funding; Galderma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Actelion: Consultancy, Research Funding. Musiek:Menlo: Other: Investigator; Helsinn: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Soligenix: Other: Investigator; Pfizer: Other: Investigator; Elorac: Other: Investigator; Kyowa: Honoraria, Other: Above honoraria: for Ad Board; miRagen: Other: Investigator. Ortiz-Romero:Actelion: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyowa: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PLCG1: Patents & Royalties; miRagen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MEDA: Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; 4SC: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Eradat:Kyowa: Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Research Funding. Magnolo:University Hospital of Muenster, Center of Innovative Dermatology: Employment. Scarisbrick:Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Recordat: Consultancy; 4SC: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Innate Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Helsinn: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dalle:Kyowa: Other: Principal Investigator in clinical trials promoted by Kyowa. Fisher:Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy. Poligone:Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Regeneron: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Actelion: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Bioniz: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Helsinn: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Innate Pharma: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; miRagen: Research Funding; Soligenix: Research Funding. Pro:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kyowa Hakka Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding. Quaglino:Actelion: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Innate Pharma: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Kyowa Kirin: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Helsinn: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Therakos: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board. Reddy:AbbVie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; KITE: Honoraria; Merck: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Geskin:Merck: Other: Supported/Contracted Research; UpToDate: Patents & Royalties: Royalty, Receipt of Intellectual Property Rights / Patent Holder; Actelion: Other: Supported/Contracted Research; Helsinn: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Supported/Contracted Research; Stratpharma: Other: Supported/Contracted Research; Mallinckrodt: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Supported/Contracted Research; Medscape: Speakers Bureau; Medivir: Consultancy, Honoraria. Halwani:Amgen: Other: Investigator; Takeda: Other: PI; Seattle Genetics: Other: PI; Pharmacyclics: Other: Investigator; miRagen: Other: PI; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Other: PI; Immune Design: Other: PI; Genentech, Inc.: Other: Investigator; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Other: PI; AbbVie: Other: PI. Khot:Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre: Employment; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy. Korman:Genentech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Dermira: Research Funding; Glaxo: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Immune Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyowa: Research Funding; Leo: Research Funding; Menlo: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding; Principia: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Prothena: Research Funding; Regeneron: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rhizen: Research Funding; Sun: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syntimmune: Research Funding; UCB: Research Funding; Valeant: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eli Lilly: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Horwitz:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Affimed: Consultancy; Astex: Consultancy; Portola: Consultancy; ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Miragen: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Miragen: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Kura: Consultancy; Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Miragen: Consultancy; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Kura: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kura: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astex: Consultancy; Affimed: Consultancy; ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding; Aileron: Research Funding; Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy; Trillium: Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy; Portola: Consultancy; Aileron: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Kura: Consultancy; ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding; Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Aileron: Research Funding; Affimed: Consultancy; Trillium: Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Affimed: Consultancy; Astex: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Aileron: Research Funding; Miragen: Consultancy; Trillium: Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Forty-Seven: Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Astex: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Lamar:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Kyowa: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Moskowitz:Cell Medica: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Consultancy; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cell Medica: Consultancy; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding. Wells:Takeda Pharmaceuticals Australia Pty Limited: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD Australia: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Akilov:Trillium Therapeutics: Consultancy, Other: PI on the clinical trials, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Cowan:Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy. Dummer:Merck Sharp & Dohme: Other: Intermittent, project focused consulting and/or advisory relationships; Novartis: Other: Intermittent, project focused consulting and/or advisory relationships; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Other: Intermittent, project focused consulting and/or advisory relationships; Roche: Other: Intermittent, project focused consulting and/or advisory relationships; Amgen: Other: Intermittent, project focused consulting and/or advisory relationships; Takeda: Other: Intermittent, project focused consulting and/or advisory relationships; Pierre Fabre: Other: Intermittent, project focused consulting and/or advisory relationships; Sun Pharma: Other: Intermittent, project focused consulting and/or advisory relationships; Sanofi: Other: Intermittent, project focused consulting and/or advisory relationships; Catalym: Other: Intermittent, project focused consulting and/or advisory relationships; Second Genome: Other: Intermittent, project focused consulting and/or advisory relationships. Lechowicz:Kyowa Kirin Inc: Consultancy; Spectrum: Consultancy. Foss:Eisai: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Other: fees for non-CME/CE services ; miRagen: Consultancy; Acrotech: Consultancy; Mallinckrodt: Consultancy; Spectrum: Other: fees for non-CME/CE services . Wilcox:University of Michigan: Employment. Porcu:Innate Pharma: Honoraria, Other: Scientific Board, Research Funding; Viracta: Honoraria, Other: Scientific Board, Research Funding; BeiGene: Other: Scientific Board, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Daiichi: Research Funding; Kyowa: Honoraria, Other: Scientific Board, Research Funding; ADCT: Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy. Vermeer:Kyowa: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Abhyankar:Therakos: Other: Consulting, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau. Pacheco:University of Colorado: Employment. William:Techspert: Consultancy; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; Defined Health: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Kyowa Kirin, Inc.: Consultancy. Fukuhara:Kyowa-Hakko Kirin: Honoraria; Bayer: Research Funding; Mundi: Honoraria; Janssen Pharma: Honoraria; Mochida: Honoraria; Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Honoraria; Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Honoraria; Eisai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Nippon Shinkyaku: Honoraria; Zenyaku: Honoraria; AbbVie: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Solasia Pharma: Research Funding. Munoz:Pharmacyclics /Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Consultancy; Kyowa: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene/Juno: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Fosunkite: Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau; Portola: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Querfeld:Elorac: Other: Investigator, Research Funding; Trillium: Consultancy, Other: Investigator, Research Funding; Medivir: Consultancy; miRagen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Investigator; Helsinn: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Investigator; Soligenix: Other: Investigator; City of Hope Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute: Employment; Celgene: Other: Investigator, Research Funding; Kyowa: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Investigator; Eisai: Other: Investigator; Bioniz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Investigator. Uhara:Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd: Honoraria, Research Funding. Huen:Innate Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Galderma Inc: Research Funding; Rhizen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Glaxo Smith Kline Inc: Research Funding. Tobinai:Meiji Seika: Honoraria; Takeda Pharmaceutical: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen Pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ono Pharmaceutical: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Zenyaku Kogyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundi Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Eisai: Honoraria, Research Funding; HUYA Bioscience: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; AbbVie: Research Funding; Verastem: Honoraria; Chugai Pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Research Funding; Yakult: Honoraria; Solasia: Honoraria. Tokura:Kyowa Kirin Pharmaceutical Development, Inc.: Honoraria. Boh:Actelion: Other: Principal Investigator; Tulane University School of Medicine: Employment; Celgene: Other: Principal Investigator, Speaker, Grants; Sun: Other: Speaker; Janssen: Other: Principal Investigator, Speaker, Grants; Novartis: Other: Principal Investigator, Speaker, Grants; Soligenix: Other: Principal Investigator; Incyte: Other: Principal Investigator; Regeneron: Other: Principal Investigator, Grants; Ortho Dermatologics: Other: Speaker, Grants; Pfizer: Other: Principal Investigator; UCB: Other: Speaker, Grants; Elorac: Other: Principal Investigator; Abbvie: Other: Principal Investigator. Nicolay:Teva Pharmaceutical Industries: Honoraria, Other: Conference participation fees; Novartis AG: Consultancy, Honoraria; Biogen GmbH: Consultancy, Honoraria; Almirall Hermal AG: Consultancy, Honoraria; Actelion Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Leoni:Kyowa Kirin Pharmaceutical Development, Inc.: Employment. Ito:Kyowa Kirin Pharmaceutical Development, Inc.: Employment. Herr:Kyowa Kirin, Inc.: Employment. Sokol:EUSA: Consultancy.

AbstractSingapore is a multiracial, multicultural island nation; three quarters of its population is ethnic Chinese. This paper examines the phenomenon of code-switching between the younger generation and their parents, and grandparents, focusing on the English, Chinese dialect and Malay elements present in this variety of spoken Mandarin. The data is taken from university students who have recorded their conversations with their parents, grandparents, siblings and friends. Many of the older generation in their 70s still speak southern Chinese dialects such as Hokkien, Teochew, Cantonese, Hakka, and Hainanese as well as Bazaar Malay (which was a lingua franca with Hokkien). Their spoken Mandarin consists of code-switching with these dialects. The middle generation in their 50s is the generation that is able to communicate both with the older generation and younger generation in the various languages. Their spoken Mandarin consists of English, dialects, and even some Malay. The younger generation in their 20s can hardly understand or speak these dialects as a result of the Speak Mandarin Campaign which was launched in 1979 to replace all dialects with Mandarin. As such, the younger generation’s spoken Mandarin consists mainly of English code-switched elements. This paper argues that code-switching takes place mainly due to convenience to fill in the gaps when younger speakers do not know the Mandarin equivalent of the words in certain domains, given the changes in language policies in the nation. In this case, it is not necessarily a choice of code but rather filling the gaps with the language that they know out of necessity.

Background: PCGTCL is a rare disorder, accounting for < 1% of all lymphomas. In part given the rarity, timely and accurate diagnosis (dx) remains challenging. Moreover, PCGTCL is typically characterized by a highly aggressive course. We conducted a multi-institutional, retrospective analysis to delineate pathology, patient (pt) characteristics, treatment patterns & outcomes of PCGDTCL in the modern era. Methods: We collected detailed information on pts with PCGDTCL dx between 2000 - 2017 across 10 academic centers. Pathologic data, including IHC & flow characteristics on de-identified pathology reports, were reviewed centrally by an expert dermatopathologist (MP). A pathologic tier was assigned to each case based on fidelity to the following pre-defined minimum criteria: flow cytometric evidence of gamma and/or delta protein-expressing lymphoma or histopathologic evidence of gamma and/or delta protein expression & at least 50% atypical lymphocytes positive for gamma/delta immunostain (IHC) with tissue representative of entire lesion. The presence of >25% CD30 positivity of malignant lymphocytes was an exclusion criterion. Further, PCR evidence of TCR gamma monoclonality or TCR beta/betaF1 negativity alone were inadequate for inclusion with confirmation of gamma/delta phenotype (especially IHC) being key for inclusion. A clinical tier was also assigned to each case based on group consensus. A composite score was derived by combining pathologic & clinical tiers, with those fitting a pre-determined score threshold included in the primary analysis. Univariate (UVA) associations were derived via Cox model for associations with survival. Results: Collectively, all centers submitted a total of 80 cases that were dx & treated locally as PCGDTCL. 48 (60%) cases met pre-defined criteria for inclusion of bona fide dx of PCGTCL. 26 (33%) cases had insufficient composite scores and were grouped in a 2nd tier & 6 cases had incomplete follow-up data and were unsuitable for analysis. The most common reason for placement in the 2nd tier was negativity for gamma/delta IHC or lack of documentation of such testing (n=16). Among the top tier of 48 veritable cases, 32 pts (67%) were male, 39 (81%) white & 4 (8%) black. Median age was 62 years (range 20-88). 19 (40%) pts had B symptoms at dx; ECOG performance status (PS) 0 in 12 pts (25%) & 1-3 in 22 cases (45%) (unknown 29%); anemia was present in 21 pts (44%) & LDH increased in 22 (46%). Bone marrow was involved in only 3 pts (6%) & hemophagocytic syndrome was present at dx in 6 pts (12%). Frontline therapy was heterogeneous (Table 1) with the most common therapies being bexarotene alone in 8 pts; UV therapy in 6 pts; and CHOP in 4 pts. Furthermore, there was inclusion of etoposide in 12 pts (25%), anthracyclines in 9 (19%) & platinum agents in 3 pts (6%). The overall response to 1st line therapy was 40% (19% complete response) with stable disease in 10%, progression in 35% & unknown in 15%. Seven pts (15%) received consolidative stem cell transplantation (SCT), which was allogeneic in all but 1 case. The 2-year PFS for the 48 bona fide pts was 39% (95% CI 0.26-0.59) (Fig 1A) & 2-year OS was 36% (95% CI 0.23-.56) (Fig 1B). The 26 cases in the 2nd tier had overall similar 2-year PFS of 41% (95% CI 0.15-67) and OS of 37% (95% CI 0.22-0.62). In terms of impact of therapy, use of consolidative SCT in 1st remission was associated with improved survival (P=0.02) (Fig 1C). No other therapeutic variable had significance. In UVA for baseline factors, PS (P=0.006) (Fig 1D) and increased vs. normal LDH (P=0.05) were significantly associated with OS. Median OS for pts with normal LDH was 25 months vs 12 months with increased LDH. Median OS for pts with ECOG PS 0 was not reached vs approximately 14 months for ECOG PS 1-3. Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this series represents one of the largest reported to date of PCGDTCL. Accurate diagnosis and classification of PCGDTCL need ongoing analysis and delineation. Using strict criteria, only 60% of cases across 10 academic centers were confirmed as bona fide PCGDTCL. Analysis of these pts treated in the modern era demonstrated modest survival. In addition, we identified several prognostic factors, in particular LDH and ECOG PS, associated with patient outcome. Furthermore, the incorporation of allogeneic SCT in 1st remission may contribute to improved long-term survival. Enhanced treatment options and continued collaboration are critically needed in this rare disease. Disclosures Bennani: Adicet Bio: Other: Advisory board; Adicet Bio: Other: Advisory board; Adicet Bio: Other: Advisory board; Kite Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Purdue Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Purdue Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Seattle Genetics: Other: Advisory board; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Other: Advisory board; Purdue Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Kite Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Seattle Genetics: Other: Advisory board. Landsburg:Takeda: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Triphase: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Triphase: Research Funding; Curis, INC: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Curis, INC: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Haun:Karger, Inc.: Other: Royalties: Textbook. William:Techspert: Consultancy; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; Defined Health: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Kyowa Kirin, Inc.: Consultancy. Mehta-Shah:Kiowa Hakka Kirin: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Roche/Genentech: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Verastem Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Innate Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Wilcox:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Millenium/Takeda: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Feldman:AbbVie: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Speakers Bureau; Eisai: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding; Portola Pharma: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Viracta: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Cell Medica: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite Pharma: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Speakers Bureau; Corvus: Research Funding. Evens:Tesaro: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; Verastem: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Horwitz:Affimed: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Forty-Seven: Research Funding; Astex: Consultancy; Aileron: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Kura: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astex: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy; Aileron: Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Kura: Consultancy; Kura: Consultancy; Miragen: Consultancy; Miragen: Consultancy; Portola: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy; ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Aileron: Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Research Funding; Miragen: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy; Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Affimed: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Affimed: Consultancy; Astex: Consultancy; Trillium: Research Funding; Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Astex: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Kura: Consultancy; ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Miragen: Consultancy; Portola: Consultancy; Aileron: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy; Affimed: Consultancy; Trillium: Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Introduction The ECHELON-2 study (NCT01777152) demonstrated significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival with brentuximab vedotin plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (A+CHP) versus CHOP in the frontline treatment of patients (pts) with sALCL or other CD30-expressing PTCL and supported the 2018 FDA approval in this setting. Consistent with current guidelines, pts could have received consolidative stem cell transplant (SCT) after treatment at the discretion of the treating investigator. In all pts treated with A+CHP, only 22% (50 of 226) underwent SCT. Herein, we present outcomes from an exploratory analysis of pts in a complete remission (CR) following A+CHP who received an SCT and those who did not. Methods CR rate was defined at the end of treatment (EOT) by independent review per the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. ALK+ sALCL pts were excluded because they tend to have more favorable outcomes. Consolidative transplant was not considered a PFS event. A univariate analysis of SCT versus no SCT and multivariate analyses adjusting for region and age were performed. Results Sixty-seven percent (76/113 pts) of pts with ALK- sALCL on the A+CHP arm were in CR at EOT and 36% (27/76) of them received SCT. Pts who underwent SCT were younger, with a median age of 50 years (yr) (range 18-68) compared with 59 yr (range 20-85) in those without SCT. Median PFS for pts with SCT was not reached (95% CI 36.57, not estimable [NE]) versus 55.66 mos (95% CI 23.72, 55.66) for pts without SCT. Fifty-nine percent (38/64) of pts with non-sALCL on the A+CHP arm were in CR at EOT and 29% (11/38) of them received SCT. Pts who underwent SCT were younger than those without (median age 57 yr [35-73] vs 66 yr [49-77]). Median PFS for pts who did and did not receive SCT was not reached (95% CI 20.70, NE) versus 33.22 mos (95% CI 8.08, NE), respectively. Prior to treatment start, the intent to transplant in Asian countries among ALK- sALCL and non-ALCL pts was less frequent in comparison to non-Asian countries (13% and 29% vs 49% and 57%, respectively). The proportion of pts ultimately transplanted was also less frequent (13% and 12% in Asia versus 32% and 23% in non-Asian countries). Standard PFS and multivariate proportional hazards regression analyses favored the use of SCT in PTCL pts in a CR after A+CHP (Table). Conclusions Numerical PFS estimates favor the use of SCT in PTCL pts in a CR after A+CHP; however, sample sizes are small. It is also recognized that unknown confounders may impact this post-hoc analysis. We observed that use of SCT was infrequent in Asian countries, suggesting regional practice differences. The overall impact of consolidative SCT remains unconfirmed, including in patients treated with A+CHP. Further studies are needed to establish its role in this setting. Table Disclosures Savage: BMS, Merck, Novartis, Verastem, Abbvie, Servier, and Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Horwitz:Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Aileron: Research Funding; Kura: Consultancy; Affimed: Consultancy; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Forty-Seven: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding; Astex: Consultancy; Astex: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Affimed: Consultancy; Affimed: Consultancy; Kura: Consultancy; ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy; Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy; Astex: Consultancy; Miragen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Kura: Consultancy; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astex: Consultancy; ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding; Affimed: Consultancy; Portola: Consultancy; Miragen: Consultancy; Aileron: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Forty-Seven: Research Funding; Miragen: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy; Aileron: Research Funding; Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Miragen: Consultancy; ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding; Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kura: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Aileron: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy; Trillium: Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy. Advani:Regeneron: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences, Inc./Kite Pharma, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celmed: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cell Medica, Ltd: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Infinity Pharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Kura: Research Funding; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin Pharmaceutical Developments, Inc.: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Autolus: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Stanford University: Employment, Equity Ownership; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Agensys: Research Funding. Domingo-Domenech:Roche: Other: Travel expenses; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel expenses; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Other: Travel expenses. Rossi:Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Morschhauser:Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Epizyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Alpdogan:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Tobinai:Meiji Seika: Honoraria; Takeda Pharmaceutical: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundi Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Chugai Pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Research Funding; Eisai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Honoraria, Research Funding; Verastem: Honoraria; Zenyaku Kogyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Yakult: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; HUYA Bioscience: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen Pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Solasia: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ono Pharmaceutical: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Shustov:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Trneny:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Morphosys: Consultancy, Honoraria. Yuen:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding. Zinzani:Verastem: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Eusapharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy; Celltrion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Immune Design: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Portola: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Kirin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Truemper:Janssen Oncology: Consultancy; Nordic Nanovector: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding. Illidge:Div of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Univ of Manchester, National Institutes of Health and Research Biomedical Research Center, Manchester Academic Health Sciences, Christie Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust: Employment; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. O'Connor:Spectrum Pharma: Consultancy, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding; Allos Therapeutics: Consultancy; Acetylon Pharma: Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Millenium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Pro:Kyowa Hakka Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding. Little:Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Bunn:Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Fenton:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Manley:Seattle Genetics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Iyer:Incyte: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding.

Relapsed or refractory (R/R) peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) is an aggressive lymphoma with a median overall survival (OS) of 6 months. Most approved therapies have overall response rates (ORR) of &lt; 30%, low complete response (CR) rates, and short progression free survival (PFS). Duvelisib (DUV), a dual PI3K-δ,γ inhibitor, is FDA approved at 25 mg twice daily (BID) for the treatment of R/R chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma after ≥ 2 lines of prior therapy and R/R follicular lymphoma after ≥ 2 prior systemic therapies, the latter based on accelerated approval. DUV monotherapy demonstrated an ORR of 50% in patients (pts) with R/R PTCL in a Phase 1 study across multiple subtypes (Horwitz, Blood 2018). In the Phase 2, open-label, multi-center, PRIMO trial of DUV in R/R PTCL, the initial results of the dose-optimization phase (N=33) showed a 54% ORR in the 75 mg BID (N=13) and 35% in the 25 mg BID (N=20) cohorts by investigator assessment (INV) , the primary endpoint (Horwitz, ASH 2019). We report mature dose-optimization results and the initial results of a planned preliminary assessment (N=20) of the dose-expansion (NCT03372057; supported by Verastem Oncology). In the dose-optimization phase, pts received DUV at 25 mg (Cohort 1) or 75 mg BID (Cohort 2). Pts were evaluable if they completed 1 cycle (28 days) of DUV and had ≥ 1 efficacy assessment. The dose-expansion phase is ongoing with a targeted enrollment of 100 pts; pts were eligible if they had histologically confirmed R/R PTCL after ≥2 cycles of a prior standard regimen and a CD4 lymphocyte count of ≥ 50/mm3 (0.05 x 109/L). Based on the initial dose-optimization results, it was determined pts will receive DUV starting at 75 mg BID for 2 cycles to achieve more rapid tumor control, followed by 25 mg to try to maintain long-term disease control and mitigate the potential for later onset toxicities. Pts were to be maintained on therapy continuously until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. For those at 25mg BID, it was permitted for the dose to be re-escalated to 75 mg BID if an assessment shows PD and the pt had not required a dose modification due to toxicity. The primary endpoint is ORR by an Independent Review Committee (IRC), and secondary endpoints include duration of response (DOR), PFS, OS, disease control rate, and safety; all analyses consisted of pts that received at least 1 dose of DUV. The statistical analysis plan was amended to take a preliminary assessment of ORR after approximately 20 pts were evaluated for response in the dose-expansion phase, consistent with the number of pts that were evaluated in the dose-optimization phase (Cohort 2). Dose-Optimization Phase Efficacy Update: As of the data cutoff, 2 pts (1 each cohort) remain on treatment. Efficacy data are summarized in Table 1. Of those pts that achieved a CR, 1 in each cohort proceeded to undergo stem cell transplant or consolidated radiation therapy with curative intent, and are censored in the DOR assessment . Dose-Expansion Phase Initial Summary: As of the data cutoff of 23 March 2020, a total of 25 pts have been dosed, 20 of whom underwent at least 1 disease response assessment (Table 1). Pts had a median age of 61 years (range, 21-86 years) and a median of 2 prior therapies (range, 1-6). Forty-five percent (9/20) of pts remain on treatment (5 responders, 3 with assessments not yet performed, 1 on treatment with stable disease);11 pts discontinued due to PD (n=7), adverse events (n=2) , or to under go transplant (n=2). Responses occurred in 8/20 pts: PTCL-NOS (4 CR, 1 partial response [PR]), ALCL (1 PR), AITL (1 CR) and SPTCL (1 CR). The most frequent adverse events seen were neutrophil count decreased (25%), ALT increased (21%), WBC decreased (21%) and lymphocyte count decreased (21%). In summary, the DUV data observed to date show consistent response rates in a R/R PTCL pt population. The safety profile observed in PRIMO to date is consistent with the current safety profile of DUV. The mature dose-optimization phase results demonstrated a median DOR of 12.2 months for the 75 mg BID cohort. The preliminary results from the PRIMO dose-expansion cohort (75 mg BID followed by 25 mg BID dosing) show an ORR of 40 % and CR rate of 30% (6/20) by INV assessment. These data support continued evaluation of DUV as a treatment option for R/R PTCL. Updated data from the planned interim analysis after 40 pts enroll (occurred June 2020) will be presented. Disclosures Pro: Verastem Oncology: Research Funding. Brammer:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Kymera: Honoraria; Verastem Oncology: Other: Travel. Jacobsen:Takeda: Honoraria; Merck, Pharmacyclics, F. Hoffmann-LaRoche, Novartis: Research Funding; Acerta, AstraZeneca, Merck: Consultancy. Mehta-Shah:Corvus: Research Funding; Verastem: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Bristol Myers-Squibb: Research Funding; Genetech/Roche: Research Funding; C4 Therapeutics: Consultancy; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Innate Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy. Zain:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Kyowa Kirlin: Research Funding; Mundai Pharma: Research Funding. Zinzani:Immune Design: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celltrion: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Verastem: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ADC Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kirin Kyowa: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; EUSA Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Portola: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Eusapharma: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Immune Design: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Lustgarten:Verastem Oncology: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Youssoufian:Verastem Oncology: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Horwitz:Janssen: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; C4 Therapeutics: Consultancy; Beigene: Consultancy; Portola: Consultancy, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Corvus: Consultancy; Trillium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millenium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakka Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity/Verastem: Research Funding; Forty Seven: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Aileron: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADCT Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Vividion Therapeutics: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Myeloid Therapeutics: Consultancy; Miragen: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; ASTEX: Consultancy; Affirmed: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Duvelisib (DUV), a dual PI3K-δ,γ inhibitor, is FDA approved at 25 mg twice daily (BID) for the treatment of R/R chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma after at least 2 lines of prior therapy and R/R follicular lymphoma after at least 2 prior systemic therapies, the latter based on accelerated approval. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on overall response rate. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials. Duvelisib is not approved for Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma. This study is investigating treatment or outcomes that have not received approval from a Health Authority. The information presented is not intended to convey conclusions of safety or efficacy. There is no guarantee that the outcome of these studies will result in approval by a Health Authority.

Abstract Introduction: CD25 is expressed on the cell surface of many lymphomas, including classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. ADCT-301 (camidanlumab tesirine [Cami-T]) is an antibody drug conjugate comprising a human monoclonal antibody against CD25 conjugated to a potent pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimer (PBD) toxin. We report here a first-in-human clinical trial of Cami-T, focusing on patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) cHL treated in dose-escalation and subtype-specific dose-expansion cohorts. Methods: This was a Phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation and dose-expansion multicenter study in pts with R/R cHL. The objectives of the study were to assess the safety and tolerability, determine the recommended dose(s) for expansion, and evaluate pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. The clinical activity of Cami-T was measured by overall response rate (ORR; per 2014 Lugano Classification), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival. Pts received Cami-T intravenously every 3 weeks (Q3W; 1 Cycle). Dose escalation was performed according to a continual reassessment method. Results: As of June 15, 2018, 60 pts with cHL have been enrolled. Baseline characteristics include median age: 38.5 years (range 19-80); median number of prior therapies: 5 (range 2-15). Cami-T doses ranged from 5 to 300 µg/kg (median number of cycles: 3 [range 1-15], with a median treatment duration of 43 days [range 1-354]). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 57/60 (95%) pts; most common TEAEs (≥20%) were fatigue (25, 41.7%), maculopapular rash (20, 33.3%), increased gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT; 18, 30%), pyrexia (18, 30%); increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT; 14, 23.3%), dyspnea (13, 21.7%), nausea (13, 21.7%), increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST; 12, 20.0%), increased blood alkaline phosphatase (ALP; 12, 20.0%), and cough (12, 20.0%). As part of immune-related AEs, there were 2 (3.3%) cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome (1 each at dose 45 and 60 µg/kg) and 1 (1.7%) case of thyroiditis. Also, there were 16 (26.7%) cases of peripheral edema or effusion, which are AEs thought to be associated with PBDs. Grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 37/60 (61.7%) pts; the most common Grade ≥3 TEAEs (≥5% of pts) were liver function abnormalities (increased GGT [16.7%], ALT [10.0%] AST [5.0%], and ALP [5.0%]), maculopapular rash (13.3%), anemia (8.3%), and decreased platelet count (5.0%). TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 17/60 (28.3%) pts. Most pts (72%) tolerated at least 3 cycles before an AE leading to a dose reduction/delay occurred. Exposure to the conjugated antibody was dose-related and at a ≥45 µg/kg dose was sustainable throughout the dosage interval at a mean concentration of 0.0826 µg/mL (coefficient of variation [CV] 49.9%) and mean minimum concentration of 0.0092 µg/mL (CV=81.7%; n=25). The maximum tolerated dose was not reached; however, the recommended dose for expansion was identified as 45 µg/kg Q3W. Response data for 55 evaluable pts with cHL are shown in the Table. The ORR was 69.1% (38/55 pts) and the complete response (CR) rate was 43.6% (24/55 pts). In the 45 µg/kg dose group (dose escalation + expansion), the ORR was 80.8% (21/26 pts) and the CR rate was 50% (13/26 pts) (Table). ORRs by prior treatment were 80.8% (21/26) in pts who previously received brentuximab vedotin (BV), 80.0% (12/15) in those who previously received both a checkpoint inhibitor (CHPi) and BV, 81.8% (9/11) in those who had a prior hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), and 85.7% (6/7) in those who had a prior CHPi, BV, and HCT. Median DoR and PFS were 7.7 and 6.7 months, respectively (Figure). Conclusions: In pts with R/R cHL, therapy with Cami-T provided impressive ORRs and CR rates in a heavily pretreated pt population. A 45 µg/kg dose of Cami-T was identified as having optimal activity with an acceptable safety profile. Enrollment of pts with HL is now complete and initial response data for all pts with HL will be available later this year. This data supports further investigation in a planned Phase 2 study. Study sponsored by ADC Therapeutics. http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02432235. Disclosures Hamadani: Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Cellerant: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Ostuka: Research Funding; MedImmune: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Sanofi Genzyme: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Collins:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene Corporation: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celleron: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Samaniego:ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding. Spira:AstraZeneca: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding. Davies:GSK: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; F. Hoffman-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy. Radford:ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Equity Ownership; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; GlaxoSmithKline: Equity Ownership; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Caimi:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Kite Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Menne:ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Boni:ADC Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Cruz:ADC Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Feingold:ADC Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. He:ADC Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wuerthner:ADC Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Horwitz:Portola: Consultancy; Corvus: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Trillium: Consultancy; Aileron Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum: Research Funding; Kyowa-Hakka-Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Forty Seven: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Abstract Aims: Patients with the cutaneous T-cell lymphoma subtypes mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS) often require multiple lines and types of systemic therapy. The phase 3 MAVORIC study (NCT01728805) showed that mogamulizumab (MOGA), a monoclonal antibody directed against C-C chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4), is superior to vorinostat (VORI) in median progression-free survival (PFS; 7.7 vs 3.1 months, P<0.0001) and confirmed overall response rate (ORR [complete response plus partial response]; 28% vs 4.8%, P<0.0001) in patients with MF/SS with a median of three prior systemic therapies (range: 1-18). Preclinical studies have suggested that histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) may downregulate CCR4 expression in neoplastic T-cells. Further, romidepsin (an HDACi) has also been shown to suppress NK cell function, which could negatively influence the antibody activity of MOGA. As a result, this post hoc analysis of the MAVORIC study examined the effect of prior systemic therapies, including romidepsin, on response to MOGA. Methods: Patients with MF/SS who had failed ≥1 systemic therapy were randomized to MOGA 1.0 mg/kg intravenously or VORI 400 mg orally daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Confirmed ORR was based on a global composite response score in each of four disease compartments (skin, blood, lymph nodes, and viscera), achieved at two consecutive visits. PFS, ORR, and the interaction with time from treatment were assessed based on immune activity of last prior regimens, and analyzed using Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models, respectively. Results: In total, 372 patients (median age: 64 years) were randomized (MOGA, n=186; VORI, n=186). Baseline characteristics, including number and type of prior systemic therapies, were similar between cohorts. The most common last prior systemic therapies in patients randomized to MOGA were oral bexarotene (n=46; 25%), chemotherapy (n=44; 24%), methotrexate (n=20; 11%), interferon alpha (n=17; 9%), extracorporeal photophoresis (ECP; n=16; 9%), and romidepsin (n=16; 9%). Confirmed ORRs in MOGA-treated patients after 1, 3, or ≥6 prior therapies were 25%, 35%, and 30%, respectively. Patients who crossed over to MOGA from VORI, due to progression or intolerance, had an ORR of 30%. ORR and duration of response to MOGA did not vary by last prior systemic therapy (Table). Logistic regression analyses demonstrated that neither the impact of immune activity of the last prior therapy (immune stimulatory or immunosuppressive regimens) nor the time from prior treatment had an effect on PFS or ORR observed in response to MOGA (P>0.05) Conclusions: This post hoc analysis of the MAVORIC study shows no difference in MOGA response by the number of prior systemic therapies, type, or immune activity of last prior therapy. Disclosures Zinzani: MSD: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; PFIZER: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PFIZER: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneca: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celltrion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; SERVIER: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Verastem: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Horwitz:Spectrum: Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Forty Seven: Consultancy, Research Funding; Trillium: Consultancy; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa-Hakka-Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Aileron Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Corvus: Consultancy. Kim:Medivir: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Portola: Research Funding; miRagen: Research Funding; Neumedicine: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyowa-Kirin-Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Tetralogic: Research Funding; Galderma: Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Horizon Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Soligenix: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Eisai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Forty Seven Inc: Research Funding. Moskowitz:ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria. Porcu:Innate Pharma: Consultancy. Scarisbrick:National Health System, UK: Employment; Kyowa: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Helsinn: Consultancy; Actellion: Consultancy; Mallinkcrodt: Consultancy; 4SC: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Consultancy. Leoni:Kyowa Kirin: Employment. Dwyer:Kyowa Kirin: Employment. Sun:Kyowa Kirin: Employment. Nikonova:Kyowa Kirin: Employment. Bagot:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyowa Kirin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Innate Pharma: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Actelion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Abstract Introduction: CD25 is expressed in a proportion of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) cases, including subtypes such as peripheral T-cell (PTCL), cutaneous T-cell (CTCL), and diffuse large B-cell (DLBCL) lymphomas. ADCT-301 (camidanlumab tesirine [Cami-T]) is an antibody drug conjugate comprising a human monoclonal antibody against CD25 conjugated to a potent pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimer toxin. As CD25 is also expressed on regulatory T-cells, it is hypothesized that Cami-T may act as an immunomodulatory agent in addition to direct tumor cell targeting. Here, we report a first-in-human clinical trial of Cami-T, focusing on patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) NHL. Methods: This is a Phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation and dose-expansion multicenter study in pts with R/R NHL. The objectives of the study are to assess the safety and tolerability, determine the recommended dose(s) for expansion, and evaluate pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of Cami-T. The study will also assess the clinical activity of Cami-T as measured by overall response rate (ORR; per 2014 Lugano Classification and Global Response Score Grading Scales for Modified Severity-Weighted Assessment Tool for CTCL), duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Pts receive Cami-T intravenously every 3 weeks (Q3W; 1 Cycle) intravenously. Dose escalation was performed according to a continual reassessment method. Results: As of June 15, 2018, 39 pts with NHL have been enrolled in the study. Male (66.7%) and female (33.3%) pts had a median age of 67 years (range 33-88) at baseline and had received a median 3 prior therapies (range 1-12), with 9/39 (23%) pts having undergone prior stem cell transplant. Histological subtypes of NHL treated include DLBCL (n=14), mantle cell lymphoma (n=3), follicular lymphoma (n=1), Burkitt lymphoma (n=1), other B-cell lymphoma (n=4); CTCL (n=8), adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL; n=5), PTCL (n=3), and angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL; n=1). Doses ranged from 3 to 150 µg/kg (median number of cycles: 2 [range 1-5], with a median treatment duration of 22 days [range 1-127]). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 38/39 (97.4%) pts; most common TEAEs (≥20%) for pts with NHL were diarrhea (11 [28.2%] pts), fatigue (11 [28.2%] pts), pyrexia (10 [25.6%] pts) and decreased platelet count (9 [23.1%] pts). Grade ≥3 TEAEs and TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 29 (74.4%) and 5 (12.8%) pts, respectively. There were immune-related AEs reported in 5 patients, comprising one case each of dermatitis exfoliative (Grade 3), thyroiditis (Grade 3), erythema multiforme (Grade 2), hypothyroidism (Grade 2), hyperthyroidism (Grade 2), and swelling face (Grade 1). The maximum tolerated dose has not been reached. Exposure to conjugated antibody was dose-related, and following the 80 µg/kg dose was sustained throughout the dosage interval (mean average conjugated antibody concentration of 0.157 µg/mL [coefficient of variation {CV}=38.5%] and mean minimum concentration of 0.022 µg/mL [CV=99%]; n=9). Response data for pts with NHL are shown in the Table. No responses were seen below 60 µg/kg. At doses 60-150 µg/kg, the ORR was 38.5% (10/26 pts) and the complete response (CR) rate was 11.5%. In pts with B-cell lymphoma, 16 have been treated with doses ≥60 µg/kg, with an ORR of 31.3% (5/16); CR was seen in 18.8% (3/16) pts and partial response (PR) in 12.5% [2/16] pts. Ten pts with T-cell lymphoma have been treated with doses ≥60 µg/kg, with an ORR of 50% (5/10; all PR); responses were seen in the following subtypes: 2 pts with CTCL (mycosis fungoides), 1 pt with ATLL, 1 pt with PTCL and 1 pt with AITL. Enrollment into 60 µg/kg and 80 µg/kg cohorts continues for pts with T-cell lymphomas to define the optimal dose for expansion. Conclusions: In pts with R/R NHL, active doses of Cami-T with acceptable safety profiles were identified for both B-cell and T-cell lymphoma during dose escalation of this study. Five out of the 10 pts on study with T-cell lymphoma treated in the 60, 80, or 100 µg/kg cohorts responded. Subtype-specific cohorts in the dose escalation portion of this study are underway to better define the recommended dose for expansion. Study sponsored by ADC Therapeutics. http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02432235. Disclosures Collins: MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celleron: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene Corporation: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Horwitz:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Aileron Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Forty Seven: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Corvus: Consultancy; Portola: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Kyowa-Hakka-Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum: Research Funding; Trillium: Consultancy; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding. Davies:Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; F. Hoffman-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Kite: Consultancy; Acerta Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Karnad:ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding. Samaniego:ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding. Spira:BMS: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy. Fields:Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau; MSD: Speakers Bureau; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding. Menne:Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding. Boni:ADC Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Cruz:ADC Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Feingold:ADC Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. He:ADC Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wuerthner:ADC Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hamadani:Cellerant: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Ostuka: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; MedImmune: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Sanofi Genzyme: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Abstract Background: Pre-clinical data suggest a role for SYK and JAK signaling pathways as oncogenic drivers in peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). A published study described a unique translocation in 17% of PTCL specimens resulting in a SYK-ITK fusion protein, in which the kinase domain of SYK was constitutively active. This fusion protein was expressed transgenically in T cells in mice, resulting in a lethal T-cell proliferative disease, while its expression in B cells did not result in clonal expansion. Expression of wildtype SYK in PTCL is frequently observed. Additionally, gene expression profiling implicates JAK/STAT signaling in this disease and frequent activating mutations to common γ chain, JAK1, JAK3, or STAT5b are observed. SYK expression is also reported in Mycosis Fungoides (MF), the most common variant of CTCL. Moreover, malignant T cell clones from CTCL patients secrete a host of Th2 cytokines (IL3, IL4, IL5, IL6, IL10, and IL13) and exhibit deregulation of the IL2 receptor signaling pathway. These cytokines mostly signal via JAK/STAT and promote T-cell proliferation and survival, and are potential mediators of pruritus. Overall, the data suggest that dual inhibition of SYK and JAK may perturb multiple and independent survival mechanisms in PTCL and CTCL. Cerdulatinib is a small-molecule reversible ATP competitive inhibitor of SYK and JAK family members. In a phase 1 study in patients (pts) with B-cell malignancies, the recommended phase 2 dose was identified with a favorable safety profile and initial evidence of clinical activity. Subsequently, disease-specific phase 2a expansion cohorts were opened. The results of expansion cohorts in PTCL and CTCL are reported below. Methods: Pts with relapsed/refractory PTCL or CTCL who had received at least 1 prior systemic therapy were eligible to be treated with cerdulatinib at 30 mg orally BID. These expansion cohorts were enrolled in 2 stages: initially 20 pts accrued and if ≥3 responses were observed the cohort expanded to 40 pts. Both PTCL and CTCL cohorts have completed the first stage. The primary endpoint is response according to either the Lugano criteria (PTCL) or Global Assessment (CTCL). Pts are treated until progression, intolerance, or response adequate to allow stem cell transplantation (SCT). All pts receive antimicrobial prophylaxis (typically Bactrim). Results: As of July 26, 38 pts with PTCL and 22 with CTCL have received cerdulatinib. Pt characteristics: median (range) age: PTCL: 65 (34-84) years and CTCL: 63 (24-39) years; median prior systemic therapies: PTCL: 3 (1-10) and CTCL: 3 (1-12); 21% of PTCL pts and 5% of CTCL pts had prior SCT; refractory to last therapy: PTCL: 53% and CTCL: 50%. In the PTCL cohort: 26 pts are evaluable for response and 12 pts have yet to reach their first assessment. The ORR is 35% (9/26) and CR is 31% (8/26). Seven responding pts remain on drug for 3-12+ months, 1 proceeded to allogeneic SCT after achieving a CR, and 1 progressed at 15 months. Responses have been observed in pts with AITL, PTCL-NOS, and gamma-delta TCL. In the CTCL cohort: 10 pts are evaluable for response and 12 have yet to be evaluated. The ORR is 50% (5/10) and CR is 10% (1/10). All responders and 2 pts with stable disease remain on drug. Responses have been seen in pts with MF and Sezary Syndrome. Rapid improvements in pruritus appear to correlate with clinical response. Among all pts, the most common AEs of any grade were diarrhea (30%), lipase increase (20%), amylase increase (18%), nausea (13%), and neutropenia (12%). AEs ≥ Grade 3 occurring in ≥3 pts were lipase increase (n=9), neutropenia (n=6), and amylase increase (n=6). The amylase and lipase increases occurred without clinical pancreatitis and resolved with dose reduction or dose interruption. Conclusion: In ongoing 2 stage expansion cohorts, cerdulatinib has shown good tolerability and sufficient activity in both PTCL and CTCL to proceed to the second stage. Significant efficacy includes both complete and durable responses across a spectrum of PTCL and CTCL subtypes. Correlative studies are aimed at identifying predictors of response. This phase 2a study will inform the design of a pivotal trial in T-cell lymphoma. Disclosures Horwitz: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Forty Seven: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa-Hakka-Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Aileron Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Trillium: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Spectrum: Research Funding; Corvus: Consultancy. Feldman:Pharmacyclics: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Johnson and Johnson: Speakers Bureau; Portola: Research Funding; KITE: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau. Khodadoust:Innate Pharma: Research Funding. Kim:Kyowa-Kirin-Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Galderma: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Medivir: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tetralogic: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Horizon Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Eisai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Forty Seven Inc: Research Funding; Soligenix: Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Neumedicine: Consultancy, Research Funding; Portola: Research Funding; miRagen: Research Funding. Munoz:Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Alexion: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Phillips:Genentech: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding. Smith:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Research Funding; Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Portola Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma BV: Research Funding. Smith:Portola: Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy. Wilcox:Incyte, Corp: Research Funding. Steele:Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Pandey:Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Birrell:Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Leeds:Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Conley:Portola: Employment. Michelson:Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Coffey:Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Curnutte:Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Hamlin:Portola: Consultancy.

Background: Immunocompromised patients (pts) face an approximate 6-fold increase in lifetime risk of lymphoid malignancies compared with immunocompetent counterparts. Additionally, up to 80% of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) cases are driven by EBV-associated mechanisms of tumorigenesis. Approximately 70% will express CD30 and over 80% will express CD20. Recent studies of chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) have reported median overall survival (OS) of 2-4 years and treatment-related mortality (TRM) rates of 13-50%. Moreover, solid organ transplant (SOT) pts are at significant risk of graft rejection when CIT is employed, possibly due to "off target" depletion of regulatory T-cell populations. R monotherapy induction, followed by response-stratified use of CIT, has been evaluated (Trappe, et al, JCO, 2016). However, ~75% of pts had an inadequate response to R alone and required subsequent CIT; 2-yr OS for the population as a whole was ~70%. BV is an anti-CD30 antibody-drug conjugate that received accelerated FDA approval for previously untreated CD30+ T-cell lymphoma and Hodgkin lymphoma. We hypothesized that a combination of BV and R would yield improved breadth and depth of response compared with R monotherapy induction, would spare pts subsequent exposure to CIT, and result in favorable OS. Methods: We report here results of a phase I/II multicenter study investigating the efficacy and safety of BV+R as frontline therapy in pts diagnosed with immunosuppression-associated CD30+ and/or EBV+ lymphoid malignancies. Induction consisted of R 375 mg/m2 given days 1, 8, 15, 22 and BV 1.2 mg/kg given days 1, 8, 15, of a 28-day cycle, followed by restaging. Those with progression were removed from study. Pts with stable disease were offered study discontinuation or completion of one consolidation cycle followed by repeat disease assessment. Pts with partial response or complete response (CR) could receive either consolidation followed by maintenance therapy (MT) or move directly to MT without consolidation. Consolidation was identical to induction dosing; MT consisted of BV 1.8 mg/kg every 3 weeks and R 375 mg/m2 every 6 weeks for up to 1 year of therapy. Toxicity was defined using CTCAE 4.0 and response (Cheson, 2007) was assessed at the end of induction, consolidation (if given), and after cycles 4 and 7 of BV. Results: A total of 22 pts were entered in the trial. Toxicity and response data are available for 20 pts. Median age was 67 years (range, 30-79) and 14 pts (64%) were male (range, 30-79 years). Fourteen pts (64%) had received either a SOT or hematopoietic allograft requiring immunosuppression, 3 pts required immunosuppression for underlying rheumatologic conditions, and 3 pts were found to have EBV-associated lymphoid malignancies in the absence of iatrogenic immunosuppression (Table 1). Overall response rate was 70%, including a CR rate of 60%. With median follow-up of 26.1 month, the probability of progression-free survival at 1 year was 75.2% and 67.6% at 3 years (Fig 1). Probability of OS was 89.2% at both 1-year and 3-year follow-up (Fig 1). Median time to best response was 28 days. Three pts withdrew consent after induction, 2 pts died (1 death related to treatment), and 1 patient was lost to follow-up. Seven pts (31%) required dose adjustments or delay of medication administration during induction therapy and 45% required discontinuation of therapy due to toxicity within 1 year. The most frequent grade 3/4 toxicities were peripheral neuropathy, neutropenia, lymphopenia, and pancreatitis. The most frequent adverse events of any grade were fatigue, nausea, abdominal pain, pancytopenia, and peripheral neuropathy (Table 2). Conclusions: The combination of BV + R had an acceptable safety profile and appeared effective in achieving early remissions when used as frontline therapy for PTLD and other immunosuppression-related lymphomas. Specifically, over half of pts achieved CR, and 75% have been spared exposure to multi-agent cytotoxic chemotherapy. Furthermore, survival and PFS data were encouraging compared with historical controls. However, nearly half of pts discontinued therapy within 1 year due to toxicity suggesting poor long-term tolerance of the regimen and that earlier cessation of therapy may be warranted. Further studies are needed to confirm these efficacy results and to determine optimal BV+R dosing regimens and durations. Disclosures Pro: Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kyowa Hakka Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria. Gordon:Gilead: Other: Advisory Board; Bayer: Other: Advisory Board; Juno/Celgene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Zylem LLC: Other: co-founder; research in nanoparticles in cancer. Karmali:Gilead/Kite; Juno/Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Astrazeneca: Speakers Bureau; Takeda, BMS: Other: Research Funding to Institution. Winter:Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding. Ma:Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Xeme: Research Funding; Bioverativ: Consultancy; Beigene: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Kite: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy; Abbvie: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Behdad:Pfizer: Other: Speaker; Thermo Fisher: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Loxo-Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Petrich:AbbVie: Employment, Equity Ownership. Smith:Portola Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

Introduction Relapsed or refractory (R/R) peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) carries a poor prognosis, with most approved therapies having response rates of &lt; 30% and limited progression-free survival (PFS). Duvelisib (DUV), a dual PI3K-δ,γ inhibitor, is FDA approved at 25 mg twice daily (BID) for the treatment of R/R chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma after ≥ 2 lines of prior therapy and R/R follicular lymphoma after ≥ 2 prior systemic therapies. DUV exhibited potent activity against T-cell lymphoma cell lines in vitro, and DUV monotherapy at 25 or 75 mg BID demonstrated clinical activity in patients (pts) with R/R peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) in phase 1 studies [overall response rate (ORR), 50%] across multiple subtypes (Horwitz et al. Blood 2018; Horwitz et al. 2019 ICML). The phase 2 PRIMO trial was designed to determine an optimal regimen of DUV monotherapy in R/R PTCL and characterize the efficacy and tolerability of DUV in this disease. We report the results for the dose-optimization phase of the PRIMO trial (NCT03372057). Methods In the dose-optimization phase, pts with R/R PTCL, ECOG performance score of ≤ 2, and no history of allogeneic stem cell transplant were randomized to receive DUV 25 mg BID with an option for dose escalation (cohort 1) or DUV 75 mg BID (cohort 2) continuously until development of progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity (cycle = 28 days). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed ORR, and secondary endpoints included duration of response and safety. Results A total of 33 pts (cohort 1, n = 20; cohort 2, n = 13) were treated in the dose-optimization phase (Table). Pts had a median of 1.5 years (range, 0.3-12.7 years) from initial diagnosis and a median of 2 prior therapies (range, 1-8). Patients were evaluable if they completed 1 cycle of DUV and had ≥ 1 efficacy assessment. Nonevaluable patients could be replaced. Response was assessed in the evaluable and overall populations. All patients in cohort 2 and 13 of 20 patients in cohort 1 were able to complete 1 cycle of therapy. Seven patients in cohort 1 discontinued therapy early due to disease progression and/or toxicity. Low CD4 counts (&lt; 50 cells/mm3; Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 4) were associated with early discontinuation of DUV. Most responses (cohort 1, 5/7; cohort 2, 6/7) were observed at the end of cycle 1. At a median follow-up of 20 weeks, the majority of responders (cohort 1, 4/7; cohort 2, 6/7) were still in response at the time of their last assessment. ORR as assessed by blinded independent central review could be determined for 31 patients and was 42% in cohort 1 and 67% in cohort 2. Table. Analysis Populations and Investigator-Assessed Response Pharmacokinetic analysis demonstrated a dose-related increase in exposure, with ≈ 2-fold increase in the steady-state exposure of DUV at the 75 vs 25 mg BID dosage, suggesting that adequate exposure can be more rapidly and reliably achieved with a higher dose of DUV. No differences were observed in pharmacodynamic markers (pAKT in monocytes and B cells) at 25 and 75 mg dose levels. The most common (≥ 3 patients) grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) in all patients receiving DUV were neutropenia (7), thrombocytopenia (5), and sepsis (4), with disease progression, pneumonia, aspartate aminotransferase elevation, lymphopenia, dyspnea, and rash observed in 3 patients. Serious AEs occurring in ≥ 2 patients were colitis, pyrexia, disease progression, sepsis, pneumonia, hyponatremia, dyspnea, pneumonitis, and respiratory failure. Overall, 12% of pts receiving DUV discontinued due to an AE. Conclusions These findings confirm that both 25 and 75 mg BID starting dosages of DUV are clinically active in pts with R/R PTCL, with complete responses in both cohorts. There were no unexpected toxicities. Early progression was seen more frequently in the 25 mg cohort, and higher initial exposure may be important in aggressive diseases. The expansion phase of the PRIMO trial will investigate DUV starting at 75 mg BID for 2 cycles to achieve rapid tumor response, followed by 25 mg BID to maintain long-term disease control and mitigate the potential for later onset toxicity. Disclosures Horwitz: Miragen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Aileron: Research Funding; Aileron: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding; Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy; Astex: Consultancy; Affimed: Consultancy; Kura: Consultancy; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Affimed: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astex: Consultancy; ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Aileron: Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Forty-Seven: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Aileron: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kura: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astex: Consultancy; Forty-Seven: Research Funding; Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding; Astex: Consultancy; Miragen: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Affimed: Consultancy; Miragen: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Forty-Seven: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Affimed: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy; Trillium: Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy; Kura: Consultancy; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Miragen: Consultancy; Trillium: Research Funding; Kura: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding. Mehta-Shah:Kiowa Hakka Kirin: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Verastem Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Innate Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Pro:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kyowa Hakka Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding. Jacobsen:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Acerta: Consultancy; Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy; F. Hoffmann-LaRoche: Research Funding. Casulo:Celgene: Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses; Roche: Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses. Brammer:Celgene: Research Funding; Seatlle Genetics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Haney:Verastem Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Youssoufian:Verastem Oncology: Consultancy, Equity Ownership. Weaver:Verastem Oncology: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties: Inventor; Hillstream Biopharma: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; FemtoDx: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties: Inventor. Baglio:Verastem Oncology: Employment. Narasimhan:Verastem: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zain:Spectrum: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Duvelisib (DUV), a dual PI3K-delta,gamma inhibitor, is US FDA approved at 25 mg twice daily (BID) for the treatment of R/R chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma after at least 2 lines of prior therapy and R/R follicular lymphoma after at least two prior systemic therapies.

Introduction The phase 3 ECHELON-2 study (NCT01777152) demonstrated that frontline treatment with brentuximab vedotin (BV) plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (A+CHP) is superior to cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) for patients (pts) with systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (sALCL) or other CD30-expressing peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) (Horowitz S, et al. Lancet 2019). With a median follow-up of 36.2 months for progression-free survival (PFS), the hazard ratio (HR) (0.71 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.54, 0.93], P=0.01) favored A+CHP over CHOP. The median PFS was 48.2 months (95% CI: 35.2, not evaluable) versus 20.8 months (95% CI: 12.7, 47.6) for A+CHP and CHOP, respectively. With a median follow-up of 42.1 months for overall survival (OS), the HR (0.66 [95% CI: 0.46, 0.95], P=0.02) also favored A+CHP over CHOP. Median OS was not reached for either arm. With these results, A+CHP was the first treatment regimen to show an OS benefit over CHOP in this pt population. Herein, we report results with a median follow-up of 44.3 months for PFS and 55.5 months for OS. Methods ECHELON-2 is a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, active-comparator, multicenter study. Eligible adult pts with previously untreated CD30-positive PTCL (targeting 75% ± 5% with sALCL) were randomized to A+CHP or CHOP for six or eight cycles. Randomization was stratified by histological subtype and international prognostic index score. The primary endpoint of PFS was assessed per blinded independent central review in the primary analysis and per investigator in this updated analysis. Key secondary endpoints were OS, PFS in sALCL, complete remission (CR) rate, and objective response rate (ORR). Subsequent therapies, including BV or BV-containing regimens, were permitted. Results A total of 452 pts were enrolled and randomized 1:1 with 226 pts in each arm. The study included pts with advanced disease (Stage III [27%] and Stage IV [53%]; IPI ≥2 [78%]); given target enrollment, most pts (316 [70%]) had sALCL (218 [48%] anaplastic lymphoma kinase [ALK]-negative and 98 pts [22%] ALK-positive). With additional follow-up, the HRs for PFS per investigator (0.70 [95% CI: 0.53, 0.91], P=0.0075) (Figure 1) and OS (0.74 [95% CI: 0.54, 1.02], P=0.0688) continue to favor A+CHP over CHOP. The median PFS was 63.5 months (95% CI: 42.0, not evaluable) versus 23.8 months (95% CI: 13.6, 55.9) for A+CHP and CHOP, respectively. The estimated 5-year PFS was 50.9% (95% CI: 42.1, 59.1) for the A+CHP arm versus 42.7% (95% CI: 35.3, 49.8) for the CHOP arm. Median OS was not reached for either arm. The estimated 5-year OS was 68.7% (95% CI: 61.3, 75.0) for the A+CHP arm versus 60.3% (95% CI: 52.8, 67.0) for the CHOP arm. The PFS analyses for key prespecified subgroups were generally consistent with the overall study results (Figure 2). In the subset of pts with sALCL, the HR for PFS (0.55 [95% CI: 0.39, 0.78]) also favors A+CHP over CHOP, with an estimated 5-year PFS of 59.8% (95% CI: 48.0, 69.7) for the A+CHP arm versus 48.1% (95% CI: 39.1, 56.6) for the CHOP arm. A total of 23 pts (10%) in the A+CHP arm (16 pts with sALCL, 4 pts with PTCL not otherwise specified, and 3 pts with angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma) and 51 pts (23%) in the CHOP arm received subsequent systemic therapy with BV. In the A+CHP arm, the median time to retreatment was 12.3 months (range, 3, 51); 15 pts (ORR: 65%) had CR (9 pts) or partial remission (6 pts) after retreatment with BV monotherapy (21 pts) or BV-containing regimen (2 pts). With additional follow-up in pts with treatment-emergent peripheral neuropathy (PN) (117 pts A+CHP and 124 pts CHOP), 68% of pts in the A+CHP arm had either resolution or improvement of these events compared with 77% of pts in the CHOP arm. Of the pts with ongoing PN events at last follow-up, 73% in A+CHP arm and 74% in the CHOP arm had grade 1 events, 25% and 23% of pts, respectively, had grade 2 events, and 2% of pts in each arm had grade 3 events. Conclusions At 5 years, frontline treatment with A+CHP continues to provide clinically meaningful improvement in PFS and OS versus CHOP, including ongoing remission in ~60% of pts with sALCL, with a manageable safety profile, including continued resolution or improvement of PN. Additional 5-year results, including data from prespecified subgroups, will be presented. Disclosures Horwitz: C4 Therapeutics: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Affirmed: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Miragen: Consultancy; Myeloid Therapeutics: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; ASTEX: Consultancy; Vividion Therapeutics: Consultancy; Beigene: Consultancy; ADCT Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Aileron: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Forty Seven: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity/Verastem: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakka Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millenium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Trillium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Corvus: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Portola: Consultancy, Research Funding. Pro:Verastem Oncology: Research Funding. Illidge:Takeda: Current Employment, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Iyer:Legend Biotech: Consultancy; Rhizen: Research Funding; Spectrum: Research Funding; CRISPR: Research Funding; Curio Biosciences: Honoraria; Trillium: Research Funding; Target Oncology: Honoraria; Afffimed: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Advani:Astra Zeneca, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Cell Medica, Celgene, Genentech/Roche, Gilead, KitePharma, Kyowa, Portola Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene, Forty Seven, Inc., Genentech/Roche, Janssen Pharmaceutical, Kura, Merck, Millenium, Pharmacyclics, Regeneron, Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Bartlett:BTG: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Forty Seven: Research Funding; Autolus: Research Funding; Acerta: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Affimed Therapeutics: Research Funding; BMS/Celgene: Research Funding; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding. Christensen:Odense University Hospital: Current Employment; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Morschhauser:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Epizyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Consultancy. Domingo-Domenech:Takeda: Consultancy, Other: Travel, accomodations and expenses , Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Other: Travel, Research Funding; Roche: Other: Travel, accomodations and expenses ; Janssen: Other: Travel, accomodations and expenses ; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Rossi:Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Other: Advisory board; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kim:Donga: Research Funding; Joihnson & Johnson: Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celltrion: Research Funding. Feldman:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Cell Medica: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Kite: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Speakers Bureau; Rhizen: Research Funding; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Other, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses; Pfizer: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Portola: Research Funding; Corvus: Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Viracta: Research Funding. Menne:Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Kyowa Kirin: Other: Travel expenses; Pfizer: Honoraria, Other; Roche: Honoraria; Bayer: Other: Travel expenses; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses; Takeda: Honoraria; Atara: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Belada:Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Illés:Celgene, Janssen, Novartis,Roche, Takeda: Consultancy; Novartis, Janssen, Pfizer, Roche;: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Janssen, Celgene, Takeda, Novartis Pharma SAS, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals Israel, Roche;: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda, Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Tobinai:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ono Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Solasia: Honoraria; SymBio: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; HUYA Bioscience: Consultancy, Honoraria; Eisai: Honoraria; Yakult: Consultancy, Honoraria; Zenyaku Kogyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Chugai Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria. Tsukasaki:Ono Pharma: Consultancy; Mundy Pharma: Honoraria; HUYA: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Chugai Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Eizai: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Yeh:AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shustov:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Hüttmann:Lead Discovery Center GmbH: Consultancy; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Gilead: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Roche: Other: Travel expenses; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany: Current Employment. Savage:Verastem: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Zinzani:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; EUSA Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Immune Design: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kirin Kyowa: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; ADC Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Verastem: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Eusapharma: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Portola: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Immune Design: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celltrion: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Miao:Takeda: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Bunn:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Takeda: Current Employment. Fenton:Seattle Genetics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Fanale:Seattle Genetics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Puhlmann:Seattle Genetics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Truemper:Janssen: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Nordic Nanovector: Consultancy; Roche: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Takeda Europe: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Abstract Human interleukin-3 receptor alpha (IL-3Ra, CD123), which promotes the proliferation and differentiation of hematopoietic cells, is highly expressed in myeloid malignancies, including acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). We newly generated KHK2823, a non-fucosylated fully human IgG1 monoclonal antibody against human IL-3Ra, by utilizing the POTELLIGENT® technology. Here, we describe the in vitro and in vivo preclinical efficacy and safety of KHK2823, as well as its pharmacodynamic (PD) profile. At first, we explored that KHK2823 bound to various hematological malignant cells and leukemic stem cells. The cells from AML and MDS bone marrows were found to be bound by KHK2823. A significant part of bone marrow cells derived from B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) patients was also bound by KHK2823. KHK2823 bound to soluble human IL-3Ra protein with a sub-nanomolar dissociation constant (KD), and recognized CD34+ CD38+ (leukemic blast) and/or CD34+ CD38- (leukemic stem cell) cells in patients with AML/MDS, as well as AML cell lines, thereby obtaining a high antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxic activity without complement-dependent cytotoxicity. Interestingly, KHK2823 did not interfere with the binding of IL-3 to IL-3R. The lack of a receptor-ligand interaction may conserve the IL-3 signal, which plays an important role in normal hematopoiesis. In a tumor model xenografting the human AML cell line MOLM-13 on nude rats, KHK2823 significantly suppressed the tumor growth at doses of 0.1 and 1 mg/kg (Figure 1). The PD and toxicity profiles of KHK2823 were assessed in cynomolgus monkeys administered at doses ranging from 0.1 to 100 mg/kg by i.v. infusion, once weekly for 4 weeks. KHK2823 was generally well tolerated in monkeys, even at 100 mg/kg. The number of IL-3Ra-positive cells in the peripheral blood of cynomolgus monkeys decreased in all groups receiving KHK2823, which suggest KHK2823 could exert its depletion activity of IL-3Ra-positive cells in human (Figure 2). Currently, the safety and tolerability of KHK2823 is being investigated in patients with AML or MDS in a Phase 1 study (NCT02181699, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02181699). This is the first non-randomized, open-label, dose escalation clinical study to investigate the safety, PK, immunogenicity and PD of repeated doses of KHK2823. In summary, KHK2823 was confirmed to bind to AML, MDS and B-ALL cells as the IL-3Ra in accordance with other publications. KHK2823 was also found to eliminate AML cells in vitro and also suppressed the AML tumor growth in the in vivo model. In addition, the number of IL-3Ra-positive cells in cynomolgus monkeys decreased following i.v. infusion of 0.1mg/kg KHK2823 with a tolerable safety profile, even at a dose of 100 mg/kg. Taken together, KHK2823 may therefore be a promising anti-IL-3Ra therapeutic drug for the treatment of AML. Figure 1. Antitumor activity of KHK2823 in a tumor xenograft nude rat model Figure 1. Antitumor activity of KHK2823 in a tumor xenograft nude rat model Figure 2. PD profile of KHK2823 in cynomolgus monkeys Figure 2. PD profile of KHK2823 in cynomolgus monkeys Disclosures Akiyama: Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Employment. Takayanagi:Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Employment. Maekawa:Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Employment. Shimabe:Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Employment. Nishikawa:Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Employment. Yamawaki:Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd: Employment. Iijima:Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd: Employment. Hiura:Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Employment. Takahashi:Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Employment. Akashi:Asahi Kasei: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Chugai: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis Pharma K.K.: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Shionogi: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Tawara:Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd: Employment.

Abstract Background Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are a heterogeneous group of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL). PTCL accounts for approximately 10% of all NHL cases in the US and Europe, and may be as high as 24% in Asia. The most common frontline treatment of PTCL is anthracycline-based chemotherapy with CHOP or CHOP-like regimens which do not produce durable remissions in the majority of subtypes, including ALK+ systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (sALCL) with high International Prognostic Index (IPI) scores. Brentuximab vedotin is an antibody-drug conjugate directed against CD30 currently approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory sALCL with demonstrated antitumor activity in frontline PTCL. A phase 1 trial combining brentuximab vedotin with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (CHP [CHOP without vincristine to eliminate additive neurotoxicity]) as frontline treatment of PTCL demonstrated estimated 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates of 52% and 79% (Fanale 2018). Based on the encouraging activity and manageable safety profile of the combination, the ECHELON-2 trial was initiated to compare the efficacy and safety of brentuximab vedotin in combination with CHP (A+CHP) versus standard CHOP for the treatment of patients (pts) with PTCL (ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT01777152). Here we report the blinded, pooled analyses per investigator of the ECHELON-2 trial. Methods ECHELON-2 is a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multicenter study. Adults with newly diagnosed CD30+ (≥10% of neoplastic cells by local review) PTCL were enrolled. Pts with ALK+ sALCL were required to have an IPI ≥2. The primary endpoint of ECHELON-2 is PFS per an independent review facility. Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive 21-day cycles of either CHOP or A+CHP for 6 to 8 cycles. Consolidative SCT or radiotherapy was permitted at the investigator's discretion after end of treatment. Results A total of 452 pts across 17 countries were randomized between January 2013 and November 2016 in Europe (44%), North America (29%), and other (26%) regions including Asia and Australia. The median age was 58 years (range, 18-85) and 63% were male. Most pts were white (62%) or Asian (22%). Most pts entering the study had an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 (39% each) and the remaining 22% of pts had a performance status of 2. Most pts had advanced-stage disease (Stage III [27%] or IV [53%]) at diagnosis and 78% had IPI scores ≥2 (2 [34%], 3 [29%], 4 [12%]. 5 [3%]). PTCL subtypes included sALCL (316 pts [70%]: ALK+ 98 pts [22%]; ALK- 218 pts [48%]), PTCL - not otherwise specified (72 pts [16%]), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (54 pts [12%]), adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (7 pts [2%]), and enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (3 pts [1%]). Of the 452 randomized pts, 449 received at least 1 dose of study treatment and all pts had either completed (82%) or discontinued treatment as of April 2017. Treatment was discontinued for adverse events (AEs) (7%), progressive disease (7%), investigator decision (2%), and patient decision (2%). Preliminary results by investigator assessment, show an overall blinded pooled objective response rate (ORR) following completion of the frontline treatment of 79% (95% CI: 75.4-83.1) with 64% achieving a complete response (CR) (95% CI: 59.1-68.2). With a median follow-up of 35.2 mos, the 3-year PFS and OS for all pts were 52.9% (95% CI: 47.7-57.7) and 73.1% (95% CI: 68.3-77.2). The incidence of AEs was consistent with the known safety profiles of brentuximab vedotin and CHOP chemotherapy, including the AE of interest, peripheral sensory neuropathy (43%). Grade 3 or higher AEs reported in ≥10% of pts were neutropenia (33%), febrile neutropenia (17%), and anemia (12%). Conclusions ECHELON-2 is the largest prospective, randomized, double-blind study to compare the efficacy and safety of standard CHOP with an alternative regimen that includes a CD30-targeted agent in frontline treatment of sALCL and other CD30+ PTCLs. Blinded pooled data from ECHELON-2 show that the treatment was well tolerated with encouraging 3-year PFS and OS rates. The primary analysis by treatment regimen will be unblinded prior to the meeting and presented at the conference. Disclosures Horwitz: Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Aileron Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Forty Seven: Consultancy, Research Funding; Corvus: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Trillium: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum: Research Funding; Kyowa-Hakka-Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding. O'Connor:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding. Pro:kiowa: Honoraria; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding; portola: Honoraria. Illidge:Nordic Nanovector: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. Fanale:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding; Merck & Co: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding. Advani:Agensys: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Participated in an advisory board, Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Participated in an advisory board; Merck: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Autolus: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Participated in an advisory board; Celgene: Research Funding; Kyowa: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Participated in an advisory board; Regeneron: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Infinity: Research Funding; Kura: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Participated in an advisory board, Research Funding; Gilead/Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Participated in an advisory board; Cell Medica: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Participated in an advisory board; Millenium: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Participated in an advisory board, Research Funding; Forty Seven Inc.: Research Funding; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Participated in an advisory board. Bartlett:KITE: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ImaginAB: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck & Co: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Acerta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Forty Seven: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding. Christensen:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Morschhauser:Janssen: Other: Scientific Lectures; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Epizyme: Consultancy; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Domingo-Domenech:Affimed: Research Funding. Rossi:Novartis: Honoraria; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel expenses; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel expenses; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Travel expenses; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Alexion: Other: Travel expenses. Feldman:Portola: Research Funding; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; KITE: Speakers Bureau; Johnson and Johnson: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau. Lennard:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Belada:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Illés:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Tobinai:Zenyaku Kogyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Eisai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ono Pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Research Funding; SERVIER: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Honoraria, Research Funding; HUYA Bioscience International: Consultancy, Honoraria; Chugai Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Tsukasaki:Celgene: Honoraria; Eisai: Research Funding; Chugai Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; HUYA: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ono Pharma: Consultancy; Daiich-Sankyo: Consultancy; Mundy Pharma: Honoraria; Kyowa-hakko/Kirin: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Yeh:GNT Biotech & Medicals Crop.: Research Funding. Shustov:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Hüttmann:Roche: Other: Travel expenses; Celgene: Other: Travel expenses. Savage:Verastem: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy. Yuen:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Zinzani:MSD: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celltrion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; SERVIER: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Astra Zeneca: Speakers Bureau; Verastem: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PFIZER: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PFIZER: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Hua:Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.: Employment. Little:Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Rao:Seattle Genetics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Woolery:Seattle Genetics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Manley:Seattle Genetics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Trümper:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding.

This paper presents a preliminary 100-item Swadesh word list for Nuitah Zophei. Zophei or Zyphe (ISO 639-3 ZYP) belongs to the Maraic branch of Kuki-Chin within the Tibeto-Burman language family (Eberhard et. al, 2020). Nuitah (also known as Leitak) is a village in the southern part of the Zophei-speaking area in Thantlang Township, Chin State, Myanmar. The word list comes from the intuitions of our co-author Kimberly Biakthapar Sakhong, a 21-year-old native speaker born in Nuitah village of Zophei parents (both from Nuitah), who lived for some of her childhood in Hakha and Malaysia before moving to the US. She currently lives in Indianapolis, Indiana. She also speaks Hakha Lai, Senthang, and English.

Background: MCL carries a poor overall prognosis despite high response rates to induction chemotherapy. Maintenance strategies have impacted survival in MCL but optimal strategies have yet to be defined. Despite profound activity of ibrutinib, a selective BTK inhibitor, in relapsed/refractory MCL, ibrutinib maintenance (I-M) following induction for treatment-naive MCL has not been explored. We report preliminary results of a multicenter phase II trial assessing efficacy and safety of I-M for MCL after frontline induction. Methods: Patients (pts) with MCL with complete or partial response (CR/PR) to frontline chemo-immunotherapy +/- autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT) received I-M 560 mg daily for up to 4 years. The primary objective was 3 year PFS rate with I-M. Secondary objectives were PR to CR conversions, median OS after 4 years and toxicity. Measurable residual disease (MRD) assessments using an NGS-MRD Assay (detection resolution of < 1 cell per million; Adaptive Biotechnologies) on peripheral blood and/or PBMCs were planned at 4 time points: prior to I-M initiation and at 1, 6 and 18-24 mo(s) after initiation of I-M. Results: Accrual is complete (n=36). Median age was 60 (range 46-90), 28 pts (78%) were males, 28 (78%) had advanced stage and 9 (25%) had extranodal disease. 18 (50%), 7 (19%) and 11 (31%) had low vs intermediate vs high risk MIPI respectively. For induction, 17 (47%) received bendamustine-rituximab (BR), 18 (50%) a cytarabine-based regimen, and 1 (3%) R-CHOP. 18 (50%) had autoSCT in CR1 prior to enrollment. 33 (92%) and 3 (8%) had CR and PR with induction respectively with 1 PR to CR conversion on I-M. Median follow-up from initiation of induction therapy was 33 mos. With a median follow-up of 24.5 mos from initiation of I-M, 1 pt had disease progression (PD) and 2 others died, 1 from hepatic cholangiocarcinoma 2 years after I-M discontinuation for toxicity (atrial fibrillation) and 1 from unknown cause. 20/36 (56%) pts remain on I-M (median 24 cycles, range 1-52). Sixteen pts discontinued ibrutinib, including 3 for completion of 4 years of I-M. Of the remaining 13 who discontinued, TRAEs accounted for 10 (77%) and the other 3 were for uterine cancer (n=1), PD (n=1), and death of unknown cause (n=1) (Table 1). Atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter accounted for 50% (n=5) of TRAEs that led to I-M discontinuation. 9 (25%) pts required permanent dose reductions for TRAEs with neutropenia (n=3), myalgias (n=2), and fatigue (n=2) being the most common. Collectively, TRAEs led to dose reductions/ interruptions/ discontinuations in 25 (69%) pts. At time of data cut-off, (July 2019), using a trackable dominant clone identified from tissue at diagnosis, MRD was assessed in 12 patients at varying time points (Figure 1). In these 12 pts, 6 were induced with BR, 5 with a cytarabine-based regimen, and 1 with R-CHOP and 5 were consolidated with autoSCT prior to enrollment. Prior to I-M initiation, 9 pts were MRD (-) and 3 had indeterminate MRD status. Indeterminate results corresponded with total cell counts below the level of detection and quantification with our assay. Those with indeterminate MRD status were confirmed to be MRD (-) with subsequent evaluation after 1 month of I-M. 3 of 12 (25%) pts became MRD (+) on I-M. The first reverted back to MRD (-) status and remains MRD (-) with clinical CR on > 3 years of I-M. The second pt was treated with hyperCVAD with PR prior to I-M. This patient required several dose interruptions for neutropenia just prior to MRD detection with clinical PD leading to discontinuation of therapy after 9 months of I-M. The third pt was treated with R-CHOP + autoSCT with PR prior to I-M and maintains a PR despite MRD conversion on > 2 years of I-M. Further analysis of dynamic changes in dominant and non-dominant clones associated with I-M is ongoing. Conclusions: I-M is feasible in MCL pts who respond to frontline chemo-immunotherapy +/- autoSCT with manageable toxicities consistent with the known safety profile of ibrutinib. Guidelines to discontinue I-M for atrial fibrillation were strictly upheld in this protocol though not typical of current practice. NGS can be used to assess MRD with induction and maintenance therapy and demonstrates that most pts are MRD negative after intensive induction. Longer follow-up, evaluation of dynamic changes in MRD, and PFS and OS data are needed to assess clinical relevance of I-M and importance of MRD status, and may support larger, controlled studies. Disclosures Karmali: Gilead/Kite; Juno/Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda, BMS: Other: Research Funding to Institution; Astrazeneca: Speakers Bureau. Abramson:AbbVie Inc, Amgen Inc, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Celgene Corporation, EMD Serono Inc, Genentech, Gilead Sciences Inc, Janssen Biotech Inc, Juno Therapeutics, a Celgene Company, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Kite Pharma Inc, Merck, Novartis, Seattle Gen: Consultancy. Stephens:Karyopharm: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding. Winter:Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding. Ma:Genentech: Consultancy; Gilead: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Acerta: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Kite: Consultancy; Juno: Research Funding; Xeme: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Beigene: Research Funding; Bioverativ: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding. Petrich:Abbvie: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kuhr:Adaptive Biotechnologies: Employment, Other: shareholder. Gordon:Zylem LLC: Other: co-founder; research in nanoparticles in cancer; Bayer: Other: Advisory Board; Juno/Celgene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Gilead: Other: Advisory Board. Pro:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kyowa Hakka Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: We will discuss results of our trial looking at ibrutinib maintenance in frontline MCL

Abstract Background: A histologic finding of large cell transformation (LCT) in Mycosis fungoides (MF) is often associated with an aggressive clinical course and inferior prognosis (Arulogun et al. Blood 2008). In patients (pts) with advanced MF (stage IIB-IV), LCT has been established as an independent prognostic factor (Scarisbrick et al. JCO 2015). Although CD30 expression is observed more frequently in MF with LCT vs without LCT, a wide range of CD30 expression levels is observed in LCT lesions and the level of expression lacks prognostic value for MF (Vergier et al. Blood. 2000). The ALCANZA study (NCT01578499) demonstrated significantly better rates of objective response lasting ≥4 months (ORR4) (∆43.8%; p<0.0001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (16.7 months vs 3.5 months; p<0.0001) with brentuximab vedotin vs physician's choice (PC) of oral methotrexate or bexarotene in adults with previously treated CD30+ MF or primary cutaneous anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (Prince et al. Lancet 2017). Despite variability in CD30 expression, significant improvements in ORR4 and PFS were consistently seen with brentuximab vedotin over PC, across all CD30 expression levels in pts with MF. This post-hoc analysis characterized the proportion of pts with LCT, efficacy of brentuximab vedotin in pts with LCT and relationship to CD30 expression. Methods: Analyses were performed on skin biopsies taken from 98 pts with previously treated CD30+ MF who were randomized 1:1 to receive brentuximab vedotin or PC. CD30 expression levels were measured by immunohistochemistry on samples obtained during screening of pts for the ALCANZA study. LCT status at baseline was assessed using ≥2 biopsies obtained at screening; pts were deemed to have LCT if any biopsy showed presence of LCT (large cells - with nuclei ≥4 times larger than those of normal lymphocytes - present in >25% of total dermal infiltrate or forming microscopic nodules). Objective response rates lasting ≥4 months (ORR4), PFS, and safety endpoints were assessed according to LCT and CD30 expression. Results: Baseline demographics and LCT status by disease stage are described in Table 1. In both arms, 17/49 pts (35%) pts had LCT, and LCT was found more frequently in stage IIB pts (59% [brentuximab vedotin] and 41% [PC]). Brentuximab vedotin improved ORR4 vs PC in pts with LCT (11/17 [64.7%] vs 3/17 [17.6%]; p=0.006) and without LCT (12/31 [38.7%] vs 2/31 [6.5%]; p=0.003) (Table 2). Median PFS improved with brentuximab vedotin vs PC in pts with LCT (15.5 vs 2.8 months; HR=0.304; 95% CI 0.139, 0.668; p=0.002) and without LCT (16.1 vs 3.5 months; HR=0.364; 95% CI 0.200, 0.662; p<0.001). Median PFS follow-up times were 26.0 months (both arms, pts without LCT), 36.0 months (brentuximab vedotin arm, pts with LCT), and not estimable (PC arm, pts with LCT). Grade ≥3 adverse event (AE), drug-related grade ≥3 AE and serious AE rates were similar across LCT status groups (Table 2), and CD30 expression levels and were not associated with treatment-emergent AEs in the brentuximab vedotin arm. In pts with LCT, median average CD30 expression was 50% of total dermal infiltrate (range 3-95%) in the brentuximab vedotin arm and 35% (6.3-97.5%) in the PC arm (Figure 1), although pts with high baseline average CD30 expression (upper tercile of all enrolled MF pts) were more likely to have LCT; in the high CD30 expression sub-group, 56% and 64% of pts had LCT in the brentuximab vedotin and PC arms, respectively. Globally, pts with LCT treated with brentuximab vedotin who achieved an ORR4 had higher median average baseline CD30 levels (65%) vs pts who did not attain ORR4 (20%). Of the pts with LCT who achieved an ORR4, 9/11 pts in the brentuximab vedotin arm had baseline average CD30 expression levels ≥40%, but responses were also noted in the 2 pts with low average CD30 levels (10% and 17.5%). Conclusions: Previously, there were limited data on the relationship between LCT status and clinical outcome or CD30 expression in MF pts treated with brentuximab vedotin. Our analyses demonstrated that pts with MF benefitted from brentuximab vedotin regardless of LCT status. A wide range of CD30 expression levels was observed in pts with MF and LCT. In these pts, high baseline CD30 expression levels were generally predictive of a good response to treatment with brentuximab vedotin although meaningful responses were observed in those with lower CD30 levels. Disclosures Kim: Merck: Research Funding; Eisai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Tetralogic: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Innate Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; miRagen: Research Funding; Medivir: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyowa-Kirin-Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Horizon Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Portola: Research Funding; Soligenix: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Galderma: Research Funding; Forty Seven Inc: Research Funding; Neumedicine: Consultancy, Research Funding. Prince:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Whittaker:Galderma: Research Funding. Horwitz:Trillium: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum: Research Funding; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa-Hakka-Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Aileron Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Forty Seven: Consultancy, Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Corvus: Consultancy. Duvic:UT MD Anderson Cancer Center: Employment; Shape: Research Funding; Concert Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy; Forty Seven, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Precision Oncology, LLC: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aclaris Therapeutics Int'l Ltd.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MEDACorp: Consultancy; Cell Medica Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Medscape: Other: Speaker/Preceptor; Array Biopharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; American Council on Extracorporeal Photopheresis (ACE): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Medivir AB: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spatz Foundation: Research Funding; Rhizen Pharma: Research Funding; Dr. Reddy's Laboratories (A.K.A. Promius Pharma): Consultancy; Mallinckrddt Pharmaceuticals (formerly Therakos): Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; The Lynx Group: Consultancy; MiRagen Therapeutics: Consultancy; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; Soligenix, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Huya Bioscience Int'l: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Evidera, Inc.: Consultancy; Huron Consulting Group: Consultancy; Defined Health: Consultancy; Taiwan Liposome Company LTD: Consultancy; Jonathan Wood & Associates: Other: Speaker; Celgene Corp: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eisai: Research Funding; Allos: Research Funding; Oncoceuticals: Research Funding; Tetralogics: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Co: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Clinical Care Options: Consultancy. Bechter:MSD: Consultancy; Pierre Fabre: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Stadler:ICN: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Incmited: Consultancy; Johnson and Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Scarisbrick:Takeda harmaceuticals: Consultancy. Zinzani:Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Verastem: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; PFIZER: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneca: Speakers Bureau; TG Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SERVIER: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; PFIZER: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celltrion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; TG Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Eradat:Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Ortiz-Romero:Actelion: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; 4SC: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; MEDA: Research Funding; Patent of PLG1 mutation for diagnostic or treatment of cutaneous lymphomas: Patents & Royalties: Patent of PLG1 mutation for diagnostic or treatment of cutaneous lymphomas; Janssen: Other: Travel Expenses; Roche: Other: Travel Expenses; Abbvie: Other: Travel Expenses. Akilov:Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding; Trillium Therapeutics: Research Funding; Actelion Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Trotman:PCYC: Research Funding; Jassen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Beigene: Research Funding. Weichenthal:Takeda: Consultancy; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Research Funding; TEVA: Other: Grant. Fisher:Genetech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. McNeeley:Quest Diagnostics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gru:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wang:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Palanca-Wessels:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lisano:Seattle Genetics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Li:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment. Lin:Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Employment, Equity Ownership. Little:Takeda: Employment, Equity Ownership. Trepicchio:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Employment. Dummer:Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS): Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sun Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pierre Fabre: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck Sharp & Dhome (MSD): Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Background: Interleukin-2-Inducible T-Cell Kinase (ITK) is a Tec-family, non-receptor tyrosine kinase expressed in T-cells that plays a key role in T-cell receptor (TCR) signaling, which is required for development and differentiation of T-cells. In T-cell lymphoproliferative disorders, expression of the TCR and its downstream signaling components, including ITK, are maintained which suggests malignant T cells exploit this growth and survival pathway to their advantage. Antigen-presenting cells, abundant in the lymphoma microenvironment, also may provide antigen to drive TCR signaling through ITK. CPI-818 is a first-in-class, irreversible ITK inhibitor with selectivity for ITK. In preclinical studies, CPI-818 blocks TCR signaling in vitro and is efficacious in murine models and canines with T-cell lymphomas. We report results from the dose escalation portion of an ongoing phase 1/1b trial of CPI-818 in patients with relapsed/refractory T-cell lymphoma (CPI-818-001 study, NCT03952078). The trial is being conducted at sites in the United States, Australia, and South Korea. Methods: In dose-escalation, cohorts (3+3 design) enrolled patients with cutaneous and peripheral T-cell lymphoma who have progressed on, refractory to, relapsed, or intolerant to at least 2 standard therapies; age ≥ 18 years; ECOG status 0-1; and adequate organ function. CPI-818 was administered in ascending dose levels (100, 200, 400, 600mg BID) continuously for up to sixteen 21-day cycles, until progression or unacceptable toxicity. In dose expansion, PTCL-NOS and CTCL patients are receiving CPI-818 at a dose of 600 mg BID. The primary objectives of the study are to evaluate the safety and to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or the maximum administered dose of CPI-818. Safety events will be assessed according to the NCI-CTCAEv5. Secondary objectives include evaluating pharmacokinetics and efficacy as assessed by the investigator using standard response criteria at the end of every 3 cycles. ITK occupancy in peripheral blood T cells and tumor tissue as well as biomarkers associated with anti-tumor activity in tumor and blood samples are being evaluated. Results: In dose-escalation, sixteen patients were enrolled in four cohorts: 100 mg BID (n=4), 200 mg BID (n=3), 400 mg BID (n=5), and 600 mg BID (n=4). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in any of these cohorts and the MTD was not reached. Treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 9 (47.4%) patients and were all Grade 1-2 in severity. The most common (&gt;1 patient) were fatigue (15.8%), nausea (10.5%), and rash (10.5%) and no infections were reported. By flow cytometry, no consistent changes in circulating non-malignant or total T cell number or phenotype were observed. Pharmacodynamic analysis revealed ITK engagement by CPI-818 in all cohorts when CPI-818 is dosed BID. With increasing dose, the trough ITK occupancy in both blood and tissue increased. At doses of 200 mg and greater, trough occupancies were &gt;75%. Near complete ITK inhibition (98%) was achieved at 600 mg BID and therefore, this dose was selected as the expansion cohort dose and higher doses were not explored. Reduction in serum cytokines including IL2 (six of eight patients), IFNg (eight of eight patients), and TNFa (eight of eight patients) was observed 24hr post-dose in patients treated with doses of 400 and 600mg, but not at lower doses. In dose escalation, a total of four PTCL patients were enrolled at doses of 200 mg BID or greater. A confirmed complete response was achieved in one PTCL-NOS patient in the 200mg BID cohort. Among 7 CTCL patients enrolled, a Nodal CR, improved mSWAT and slowing of Sézary cell expansion were seen (Figure 1). Given the safety profile, the PK/PD findings, and the early signs of efficacy, PTCL-NOS and CTCL cohorts were expanded at 600mg BID. To date, two patients with PTCL-NOS and one patient with CTCL have been recently enrolled in expansion cohorts. Conclusion: The dose-escalation part of the CPI-818-001 trial demonstrated that the 100, 200, 400 and 600 mg BID doses are well tolerated. Clinical activity was observed in both PTCL-NOS and CTCL. Reduction of serum levels of canonical T cell cytokines is consistent with on-mechanism drug inhibition of inflammatory T cell pathways. Disease specific expansion cohorts for PTCL-NOS and CTCL are enrolling patients at a dose of 600 mg BID. Disclosures Khodadoust: Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy. Feldman:Abbvie: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Other, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Research Funding; Cell Medica: Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Portola: Research Funding; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Corvus: Research Funding; Rhizen: Research Funding; Viracta: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Yoon:Celltrion: Honoraria; Samyang: Research Funding; Amgen, Chongkundang, Celgene, Astrazeneca: Consultancy. Kim:miRagen: Research Funding; Elorac: Research Funding; Neumedicine: Consultancy, Research Funding; Horizon Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kyowa-Kirin Pharma: Research Funding; Medivir: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Forty Seven Inc: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Eisai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Corvus: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Portola: Research Funding; Solingenix: Research Funding; Galderma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Mehta-Shah:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Verastem: Research Funding; Innate Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy; Corvus: Research Funding; Bristol Myers-Squibb: Research Funding; C4 Therapeutics: Consultancy; Genetech/Roche: Research Funding. Kim:Mundipharma: Research Funding; Donga: Research Funding; Kyowa Kirn: Research Funding; Celltrion: Research Funding; JJ: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding. Horwitz:ASTEX: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Miragen: Consultancy; Myeloid Therapeutics: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Vividion Therapeutics: Consultancy; Affirmed: Consultancy; C4 Therapeutics: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Forty Seven: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity/Verastem: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakka Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millenium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Trillium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Corvus: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Portola: Consultancy, Research Funding; Beigene: Consultancy; Aileron: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADCT Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy. Buggy:Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Hotson:Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment. Hill:Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Munneke:Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment. Mahabhashyam:Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment. Miller:Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Janc:Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Mobasher:Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.

Background: Despite excellent outcomes in the front-line management of classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), patients with relapsed or refractory disease typically undergo second-line cytotoxic chemotherapy before proceeding to consolidation with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (autoHSCT). Pre-transplant F18-FDG-PET imaging is a well-established predictor of outcomes following autoHSCT; a complete metabolic response (CMR) to second-line therapy defined as a Deauville score 1-3 predicts a favorable outcome and is a requirement for transplant at many centers. The PD-1 pathway plays an important role in the pathogenesis of cHL and checkpoint inhibition with agents including PEM and nivolumab have shown efficacy as monotherapy in heavily pretreated disease. We hypothesized that the addition of PEM to ICE (ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide) chemotherapy will increase the rate of CMR by PET-CT prior to autoHSCT without impairing the mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) or engraftment. Here we present interim safety and toxicity data from this ongoing trial (NCT03077828) including the yields of PBPC mobilization and engraftment. Methods: Enrollment criteria include patients age >18 years medically fit for autoHSCT with relapsed/refractory cHL and excludes those with prior PD-1 inhibitor exposure, CNS involvement, more than 2 prior regimens or history of autoimmune disease. Patients are treated with 2 cycles of PEM 200 mg IV on day 1 in combination with ICE chemotherapy (ifosfamide 5000 mg/m2 day 2 CIV over 24hr, carboplatin AUC 5 IV day 2, etoposide 100 mg/m2 IV days 1-3) on a Q21 day cycle. PBPC mobilization and harvest are performed per institutional protocol on recovery post-cycle #2. A cycle of PEM 200 mg IV is then administered as monotherapy followed by response assessment with PET-CT. Patients with Deauville scores ≤3 proceed to autoHSCT per institutional protocol. A third cycle of PEM+ICE is optional following the PET-CT assessment. Neither the conditioning regimen nor management during transplantation is dictated by the protocol. Results: As of July 2019, 23 of 40 planned patients have evaluable safety and toxicity data. One patient had inconclusive pathology and was removed from study after one cycle of PEM-ICE but is included for this report. The median age was 32 (range 19-62) and 17 of 23 patients were females (74%). 8 patients were refractory to first-line therapy, and 9 relapsed within one year of treatment. 19 patients had received ABVD. Following protocol directed therapy, all but one patient had successful mobilization and collection; one had a severe allergic reaction to filgrastim and underwent bone marrow harvest instead. 16 patients collected in a single day of apheresis; the remainder collected within 4 days. The median number of stem cells harvested was 12.6 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg (range 4.2 - 46.1 x 106/kg). 3 patients underwent the 3rd cycle of PEM + ICE chemotherapy. 3 patients had Deauville scores >3 on FDG-PET response assessment; two had biopsies showing only benign processes and proceeded to transplant. Following stem cell reinfusion, all patients successfully engrafted, with a median time to absolute neutrophil and platelet recovery of 11 days (range: 9 - 24) and 12 days (range: 9 - 23), respectively. The combination of PEM + ICE chemotherapy was well tolerated. There were no reports of pneumonitis, colitis, hepatitis, or endocrinopathies. The most common toxicities were cytopenias, mucositis, diarrhea and febrile neutropenia. A single death on protocol was deemed secondary to advanced cardiovascular disease discovered mid-treatment during the patient's pre-transplant assessment. There was no clinical evidence to suggest an inflammatory process resulting in the cardiac arrest. Conclusions: The combination of PEM with ICE chemotherapy in relapsed / refractory cHL appears tolerable and safe. We found no significant hindrance to peripheral blood stem cell harvest and PEM- related AEs were uncommon. Additionally, pre-treatment with a checkpoint inhibitor prior to autoHSCT appears safe thus far and does not appear to delay engraftment. Disclosures Casulo: Celgene: Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses; Roche: Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses. Karmali:Takeda, BMS: Other: Research Funding to Institution; Gilead/Kite; Juno/Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Astrazeneca: Speakers Bureau. Pro:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses; Kyowa Hakka Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding. Mehta:Millennium/Takeda, Celgene; stock in Celgene, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Bluebird: Speakers Bureau. Gordon:Bayer: Other: Advisory Board; Juno/Celgene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Gilead: Other: Advisory Board; Zylem LLC: Other: co-founder; research in nanoparticles in cancer. Winter:Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Abstract Introduction: Empiric antifungal therapy (EAT) is recommended for persistent or recurrent febrile neutropenia based on an old randomized controlled trial, but such treatment is apparently overtreatment for the majority of patients. On the other hand, preemptive therapy triggered by positive blood tests for fungal antigens and/or imaging study findings was shown to increase the incidence of invasive fungal infection, and thus, a risk-based approach is important. The D-index, which is defined as the area over the neutrophil curve during neutropenia and hence reflects both the duration and depth of neutropenia (Figure 1A), enables real-time monitoring of the risk of invasive fungal infection. Previous studies showed that the cumulative D-index (c-D-index), which was calculated as cumulative D-index from the onset of neutropenia (Figure 1B), had high negative predictive values for invasive mold infection or pulmonary infection with cutoff values of 5,800 or 5,500 in high-risk neutropenic patients [J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 3849-54. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2010; 16: 1355-61]. Methods: We investigated a novel approach, called D-index-guided early antifungal therapy (DET) and compared it to EAT in high-risk neutropenic patients. In the EAT group, empiric antifungal therapy was started for persistent (>=4 days) or recurrent febrile neutropenia. For patients with persistent or recurrent febrile neutropenia in the DET group, preemptive antifungal therapy was applied until c-D-index reached 5,500, but antifungal agent was initiated after c-D-index exceeded 5,500, even if there was no significant finding in serum fungal makers or imaging studies, to prevent excessive invasive fungal infection. Micafungin at 150 mg/day was administered as EAT or DET in this study. We randomized 423 patients who underwent chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for hematological malignancies, in which predicted period of neutropenia exceeded 7 days, into the EAT group or the DET group, and 413 were eligible for intent-to-treat analyses (201 patients in the EAT group, 212 patients in the DET group). The prophylactic use of fluconazole or itraconazole was allowed. Primary endpoint was the development of proven/probable invasive fungal infection. Results: Backgrounds of the patients were similar between the 2 groups (Table 1). Invasive fungal infection (proven/probable/possible) was observed in 12 patients (6.0%) of the EAT group and 5 patients (2.4%) of DET group, respectively. Proven/probable invasive fungal infection was identified in 5 patients (2.5%) of the EAT group and 1 patient (0.5%) of DET group, which fulfilled the predetermined criteria of non-inferiority of the DET group. Regarding the pathogens, the EAT group included 1 case of candidemia and 4 cases of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, and the DET group included one fusariosis. The survival rate of the EAT and DET group was 98.0% vs. 98.6% at day 42 and 96.4% vs. 96.2% at day 84, respectively. During the observation period, 31 patients died due to disease progression (n=19), infection (n=5) or other causes (n=7). Causes of infection related mortality included Pseudomonas aerginosa infection (n=2), fusariosis (n=1), toxoplasmosis (n=1) and septic shock by unknown pathogen (n=1). The frequency of micafungin use was significantly lower in the DET group than the EAT group (32.5% vs. 60.2%, P<0.001). Similar results were obtained in per-protocol set analyses. Conclusions: DET successfully reduced the use of antifungal agents without increasing invasive fungal infection or mortality compared to EAT. This randomized controlled study revealed the feasibility of DET in high-risk neutropenic patients. Disclosures Kimura: Astellas: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma: Honoraria; MSD: Other: Investigator in the institute; Nippon Kayaku: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Kanda:Chugai: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Shionogi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Nippon-Shinyaku: Research Funding; Ono: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Kyowa-Hakko Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Asahi-Kasei: Research Funding; Tanabe-Mitsubishi: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Eisai: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Otsuka: Research Funding; Dainippon-Sumitomo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Taisho-Toyama: Research Funding; Taiho: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Mochida: Consultancy, Honoraria; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takara-bio: Consultancy, Honoraria. Fujiwara:Shire: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Chugai: Consultancy; Kirin: Consultancy; Kyowa-Hakko: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy. Suzumiya:Celltrion: Research Funding; Taiho: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; SymBio: Research Funding; Toyama Chemical: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Eisai: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Chugai-Roche: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Zenyaku Kogyo: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding; Sumitomo Dainioppon: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Nippon Shinyaku: Speakers Bureau; Ono: Speakers Bureau; Ohtsuka: Speakers Bureau; Shire Japan: Speakers Bureau. Takamatsu:Taisho Toyama Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; TAIHO Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Ono Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Research Funding; Chugai Pharma: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria. Tamura:Astellas Phrma: Research Funding; Eisai: Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Speakers Bureau; Ono Pharmaceutical: Speakers Bureau.

AbstractIn this paper, we examine the characteristics of unaccusative ‘give’ constructions in Chinese, and additionally identify the pathways for their emergence in some Chinese dialects, in particular Southern Min and Mandarin varieties.In this paper, the termsdialectandvarietyare sometimes used interchangeably, with the termvarietybeing the more general term that can also include variations within dialects.We distinguish between Type 1 and Type 2 unaccusative ‘give’ constructions, the former involving reversible ‘escape’-type intransitive predicates, and the latter irreversible ‘die’-type intransitive predicates. Type 1 constructions are attested in many Chinese varieties, such as Mandarin, Min, Wu, Hui, Hakka and Cantonese, whereas Type 2 constructions are more rare and thus far are mainly attested in Southern Min and some Mandarin varieties. Two major pathways in the development of unaccusative ‘give’ constructions are identified in this paper, namely, the causative pathway and the passive-mediated pathway. Our analysis also traces how the unaccusative ‘give’ construction develops into a marker of adversity and speaker affectedness. The findings of this study have implications for understanding the relationship between changes in valence (i.e., the number of core arguments that are profiled in a given construction) and speaker’s subjective stance.

Abstract Introduction: Romiplostim is a thrombopoietin mimetic protein that increases platelet production. Romiplostim has already been approved in numerous countries for treatment of immune thrombocytopenia. We previously reported a clinical trial to identify the dosage of romiplostim in aplastic anemia (AA) patients with thrombocytopenia refractory to immunosuppressive therapy (IST). Platelet, erythroid, and neutrophil responses were achieved at high rates with the initial dose at 10 μg/kg in the previous studies (Lee JW et al, ASH2016, 2017). Based on these findings, we conducted a Phase 2/3 clinical study in Japan and Korea for the purpose of evaluating the efficacy and safety of romiplostim in patients with AA who were ineligible or refractory to IST. This abstract shows the efficacy and safety results as of cut-off date (17 Nov 2017), which will be updated with 1-year follow-up result on the ASH2018 annual meeting. Methods: This study was a multi-center, open-label, intra-individual dose adjustment study in adult AA patients in Japan and Korea (NCT02773290). Patients with AA who were ineligible or refractory to IST and having thrombocytopenia with platelet count equal to or less than 30×109/L were enrolled in this study. The dosage of romiplostim was set at the initial level of 10 μg/kg and fixed for the first 4 weeks. The dose was adjusted from 5 to 20 μg/kg according to dose adjustment procedure. Patients who did not achieve a platelet response after the treatment with 20 μg/kg during 8 consecutive weeks were withdrawn from the study. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a hematological response (any of the platelet, erythroid, and neutrophil response) at Week 27. Each response was defined as Table1. The secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients achieving hematological response at Week 53; and the time from the first romiplostim administration to hematological response; and the proportion of patients with transfusion independence or decreased platelet transfusion requirement among patients receiving platelet transfusion within 8 weeks prior to the first romiplostim administration. The bone marrow and cytogenetic analyses were performed prior to enrollment and every 6 months after treatment. Results: Of 46 patients with screening, a total of 31 patients (24 Japanese patients, and 7 Korean patients) were enrolled in this study. The median age was 46.0 years old (range: 20-78 years old). All patients had received at least 1 AA treatment, most of which were antithymocyte globulin (71.0%) and cyclosporin (96.8%). As of cut-off date (17 Nov 2017), 28 patients completed assessment of Week 27, and 18 patients completed assessment of Week 53. Three patients discontinued before Week 27, and 1 patient discontinued after Week 27 but before Week 53. In total (31 patients), 26 patients (83.9% [95% CI; 66.3%, 94.5%]) achieved any hematological response at Week 27. Eight patients (25.8%) achieved tri-lineage hematological response at Week 27. The median days to reach any hematological response were 37.0 [95% CI; 36.0, 44.0] days. Of the patients who depended on platelet transfusion before romiplostim administration (15 patients), 12 patients (80.0%) achieved transfusion independence or showed a reduction of transfusion requirements until Week 53. The frequently reported adverse events (AEs) were nasopharyngitis (38.7%) followed by upper respiratory tract infection (22.6%); pyrexia (19.4%); headache (16.1%); and diarrhoea (12.9%). The frequently reported drug-related AEs were headache (12.9%) followed by muscle spasms (9.7%); and alanine aminotransferase increased, fibrin D dimer increased, malaise, and pain in extremity (each 6.5%). In bone marrow test, 2 patients showed abnormality in karyotypes after romiplostim dosing. Monosomy 7 was shown at Week16 in 1 patient who had been receiving granulocyte-colony stimulating factor prior to the start of romiplostim. This patient did not show the transformation into acute myeloblastic leukemia and/or myelodysplastic syndrome. The other patient showed the gains of chromosomes 3, 4, 14, 16, 17, 19 and 21 at Week 27, but did not show any abnormality at Week 53. None of patient discontinued the study because of AE or karyotype abnormality. Conclusion: These results demonstrate that romiplostim is quite effective and well-tolerated in adult patients with AA ineligible or refractory to IST. Disclosures Tomiyama: Sysmex Corporation: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Honoraria; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Honoraria; Novartis Pharma Co., Ltd.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lee:Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Miyazaki:Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis Pharma Co., Ltd.: Honoraria. Usuki:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Ono Pharmaceutical: Speakers Bureau; Chugai Pharmaceutical: Speakers Bureau; Takeda Pharmaceutical: Speakers Bureau; Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K: Research Funding; Pfizer Japan: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Boehringer-Ingelheim Japan: Research Funding; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; SymBio Pharmaceuticals Limited.: Research Funding; Shire Japan: Research Funding; Sanofi K.K.: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline K.K.: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma Inc.: Research Funding; Nippon Shinyaku: Speakers Bureau; Mochida Pharmaceutical: Speakers Bureau; MSD K.K.: Speakers Bureau. Kizaki:Nippon Shinyaku,: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Sawa:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Novartis International AG: Honoraria; CHUGAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.: Honoraria; Mundipharma K.K.: Honoraria. Yonemura:Alexion Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding. Keta:Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Employment. Matsuda:Novartis Pharma K. K.: Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline K.K.: Honoraria; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd.: Honoraria; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co, Ltd.: Honoraria; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd.: Honoraria; Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd.: Honoraria; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria; Sanofi K.K.: Honoraria; Beckman Coulter K.K.: Honoraria. Mitani:Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myesr Squibb: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Chugai: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Sumitomo Dainippon: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Toyama Chemical: Research Funding. Nakao:Novartis: Honoraria; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Honoraria; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Background CD47 is an innate immune checkpoint that binds signal regulatory protein alpha (SIRPα) and delivers a "do not eat" signal to suppress macrophage phagocytosis. Overexpression of CD47 can allow tumor cells to escape immune surveillance. TTI-621 (SIRPαFc) is a fusion protein consisting of the CD47 binding domain of human SIRPα linked to the Fc region of human IgG1, designed to enhance phagocytosis and antitumor activity by blocking the CD47-SIRPα interaction between malignant cells and macrophages, and engaging Fcγ receptors. Here we report updates from the first-in-human study of TTI-621 (NCT02663518) in hematologic malignancies. Methods Study Part 1 tested increasing weekly intravenous doses of TTI-621 based on 3+3 escalation. The maximum tolerated dose was initially determined to be 0.2 mg/kg based on dose limiting toxicity (DLT) of thrombocytopenia [Grade (Gr) 4 of any duration]. Expanded testing followed in patients (pts) with hematologic malignancies, including leukemia, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma. In Part 2, most pts received 0.2 mg/kg. However, based on investigator discretion, a subset of pts received escalating doses up to 0.5 mg/kg. In Part 3, pts with T-cell lymphomas received stepwise dose escalations from 0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg over the first 5−8 weeks. In over 200 pts tested in Parts 1−3, thrombocytopenia did not increase with dose, typically recovered within 2−4 days, and was not associated with clinical sequelae. Part 4 was then undertaken to optimize TTI-621 dosing and is currently escalating doses in a 3+3 manner through pre-planned dose levels (0.5, 0.7, 1, and 1.4 mg/kg) in pts with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). The DLT criteria was modified to require Gr 4 thrombocytopenia lasting &gt;72 hours. Safety monitoring includes weekly clinical laboratories and assessments of adverse events (AEs) per CTCAE v 4.03. Blood samples are obtained for pharmacokinetics (PK) and for pharmacodynamic (PD) assessments of receptor occupancy (RO) on normal peripheral T cells. Disease assessments are performed per Olsen's criteria. Results In Parts 1−3 (n=214), the most common related AEs were infusion-related reaction (IRR, 43%; 3% Gr ≥3), thrombocytopenia (30%; 22% Gr ≥3), chills (21%; 0% Gr ≥3), and fatigue (15%; 1% Gr ≥3). Objective responses to single agent TTI-621 were achieved in 14/71 (20%) NHL pts including CTCL (n=42, 1 CR, 7 PRs), PTCL (n=22, 2 CRs, 2 PRs) and DLBCL (n=7, 1 CR, 1 PR). In Part 4, as of July 10, 2020, 15 pts (9M/6F, median age 67 years) have enrolled into 4 dose cohorts (0.5−1.4 mg/kg). CTCL subtypes include mycosis fungoides (MF, n=10) and Sézary syndrome (n=5) with advanced (≥IIB) disease in 9 (60%) pts who received a median of 3 (range 1−12) prior systemic therapies. Related AEs have occurred in 11 (73%) pts including IRR (n=10) and thrombocytopenia (n=3); Gr ≥3 AEs have occurred in 4 (27%) pts including thrombocytopenia (n=3), IRRs (n=2), and exfoliative dermatitis (n=1). Thrombocytopenia generally occurred on dosing days, recovered in 2-4 days, and has not worsened with increasing doses. IRRs typically occurred during initial infusions. The Gr 3 IRR events occurred in 2 pts in the 1 and 1.4 mg/kg cohorts; low Gr IRRs have occurred across doses in 8 pts. IRRs typically resolved without recurrence and low Gr events often resolved allowing for completion of infusions. For initial infusions, the Gr 3 IRRs prompted increasing infusion times from 1 hour up to 4 hours and discretional use of steroid pre-medication. The exfoliative dermatitis occurred Day 80 and led to treatment discontinuation in 1 pt with MF whose underlying disease confounded the etiology. PK results reveal dose dependent increases in exposure; PD studies indicate ~60% RO at end of infusion up to 1 mg/kg. Antitumor activity to date includes 1 PR and 1 skin CR in 6 evaluable pts in the 1 mg/kg cohort; 2 responding pts bridged to allogeneic transplantation. The mean % change in mSWAT scores were -0.4%, -27%, and -37% for 0.5, 0.7 and 1 mg/kg cohorts, respectively. 1.4 mg/kg cohort results will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions In Parts 1−3, TTI-621 doses of 0.05 to 0.5 mg/kg were well-tolerated and demonstrated single agent activity in multiple hematologic malignancies. Preliminary data from Part 4 dose optimization indicate that weekly infusions of TTI-621 up to 1.4 mg/kg are well-tolerated without dose limiting or cumulative thrombocytopenia. Antitumor activity was seen at 1 mg/kg; dose escalation is continuing at 2 mg/kg. Disclosures Horwitz: Janssen: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; ASTEX: Consultancy; Portola: Consultancy, Research Funding; C4 Therapeutics: Consultancy; Beigene: Consultancy; Myeloid Therapeutics: Consultancy; Vividion Therapeutics: Consultancy; Infinity/Verastem: Research Funding; Aileron: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADCT Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Affirmed: Consultancy; Trillium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Corvus: Consultancy; Millenium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakka Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Forty Seven: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Miragen: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy. Foran:Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; H3Biosciences: Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Kura Oncology: Research Funding; Aptose: Research Funding; Aprea: Research Funding; Actinium: Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Revolution Medicine: Consultancy. Sawas:Flatiron Health: Current Employment; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Speakers Bureau; Affimed: Research Funding; Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Feldman:AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Viracta: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; Cell Medica: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Other, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Corvus: Research Funding; Rhizen: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Portola: Research Funding. Sokol:EUSA Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa/Kirin Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kymera Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mei:Sanofi: Consultancy; Morphosys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Flinn:Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Vincera Pharma: Consultancy; Agios: Research Funding; Iksuda Therapeutics: Consultancy; Great Point Partners: Consultancy; Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding; Forty Seven: Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding; ArQule: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Trillium Therapeutics: Research Funding; Triphase Research & Development Corp.: Research Funding; Curio Science: Consultancy; Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Consultancy, Research Funding; Curis: Research Funding; Nurix Therapeutics: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Portola Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding; Loxo: Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Calithera Biosciences: Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Other; Rhizen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Yingli Pharmaceuticals ≠: Consultancy, Research Funding; Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; IGM Biosciences: Research Funding; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Unum Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Villa:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AZ: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Nano String: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sandoz Canada: Consultancy, Honoraria; Immunovaccine: Consultancy, Honoraria; Purdue Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria. Percival:Pfizer: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Nohla Therapeutics: Research Funding; Biosight: Research Funding; Oscotec: Research Funding; Cardiff Oncology: Research Funding; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Glycomimetics: Research Funding. Jagadeesh:Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Verastem: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MEI Pharma: Research Funding; Debiopharm Group: Research Funding. Savage:Merck, BMS, Seattle Genetics, Gilead, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Servier: Consultancy; Roche (institutional): Research Funding; Merck, BMS, Seattle Genetics, Gilead, AstraZeneca, AbbVie: Honoraria; BeiGene: Other: Steering Committee. Akilov:Mallinckrodt: Consultancy; Medivir: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy; Soligenix: Honoraria; Pfizer: Research Funding; Actelion: Consultancy, Research Funding; Trillium Therapeutics Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Diefenbach:Trillium: Research Funding; Millenium/Takeda: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; MEI: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Denovo: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kim:Kyowa-Kirin Pharma: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Medivir: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Horizon Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; miRagen: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Galderma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Eisai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Corvus: Research Funding; Elorac: Research Funding; Forty Seven Inc: Research Funding; Neumedicine: Consultancy, Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Solingenix: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Portola: Research Funding. Lin:Trillium Therapeutics Inc.: Current Employment. Catalano:Trillium Therapeutics Inc.: Current Employment. Petrova:Trillium Therapeutics Inc.: Current Employment. Uger:Trillium Therapeutics Inc.: Current Employment. Molloy:Trillium Therapeutics Inc.: Current Employment. Large:Trillium Therapeutics Inc.: Current Employment. Shou:Trillium Therapeutics Inc.: Current Employment. Ansell:Affimed: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; AI Therapeutics: Research Funding.

The purpose of this paper is to show how the basic Topic-Comment ordering pattern of the Hakka can be accounted for by the constraint-based optimality theory. Part of the linguistic data used in this paper is adopted from Xu (2002), while those examples presented to show syntactic tests are created by the author. These sentences have been further checked and confirmed by a native speaker of Hakka. This paper proposes an Optimality Theoretic (OT) model that takes into account both syntactic and semantic considerations. It shows that semantic information comes into play successively at different points of OT grammar. First, integrating semantic information into the schema of OT syntax works precisely to describe the Hakka topic-initial sentence pattern. The alignment constraints incorporate information about the semantically defined topic and comment constructions into the constraint design, which interacts with other markedness constraints to filter linguistic constructions during production. Second, semantic constraints are formed to further evaluate form-meaning pairs during the process of interpretation. In this aspect, semantic notions including contrastiveness and markedness are incorporated into the theoretical plan with the purpose of pairing syntactically well-formed sentences with appropriate meaning. The paper successfully presents an optimization model illustrating how syntax and semantics cooperate to pair meanings with linguistic constructions in forming linguistic expressions.

Background: Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) and combination chemotherapy are independently used to treat relapsed/refractory (R/R) lymphoma. In vitro studies suggest that the addition of HDACi to platinum-based chemotherapy is synergistic. We conducted a phase I study of the combination of romidepsin, gemcitabine, oxaliplatin and dexamethasone in R/R lymphomas with an expansion cohort in T-cell lymphomas. Here we present the initial efficacy results. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) determination was presented at ASH 2018. Methods: The safety and tolerability of the combination of romidepsin, gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, and dexamethasone was assessed in this phase I study to determine the MTD with a 9 pt cohort expansion at the MTD. The treatment schedule included: gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 (day 1), oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 (day 1); romidepsin (day 2), dexamethasone 20 mg (days 1-4) and pegfilgrastim 6 mg (day 3) of a 21-day cycle. A 3+3 dose escalation was followed with 3 dose levels (DL) of romidepsin: 1) 8 mg/m2, 2) 10 mg/m2, 3) 12 mg/m2. The study originally included romidepsin administration on days 2 and 8 but due to prolonged cytopenias, the day 8 dose was eliminated after the first 6 pts. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined in cycle 1 as ≥ gr3 non-hematologic toxicity, any gr4 hematologic toxicity, gr≥ 3 related laboratory changes not responsive to supportive measures, and gr≥2 toxicity resulting in a &gt;14 day treatment delay. Patients could be treated until progression, intolerance, or response adequate to allow autologous or allogeneic transplantation, to a maximum of 8 cycles. Those in complete remission at restaging could limit treatment to 2 cycles beyond complete response. Results: 24 patients with R/R lymphoma (10 PTCL-NOS, 7 AITL, 6 DLBCL, 1 ALCL) were enrolled with all patients evaluable for toxicity and 23 for response (1 AITL pursued supportive care without progression in cycle 1). The median age was 70 years (range 53-81) with 50% men. The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range: 1-4). DL 2 was the MTD. There was 1 DLT in 6 pts treated in DL 1 (pneumonia); 1 DLT in 6 pts treated in DL 2 (bleeding); and 2 DLTs in 3 pts treated in DL 3 (neutropenic fever, grade 4 thrombocytopenia). SAEs included hospitalizations for pneumonia (1), nausea/vomiting (1), fever (1), tumor lysis (1), eosinophilic pneumonia (1), febrile neutropenia (1), post-procedural bleeding (1) and for complications of disease progression (7). Other grade 3-4 treatment related toxicities included thrombocytopenia (79%), neutropenia (21%), anemia (13%), hypophosphatemia (21%), hyperglycemia (8%), hypoglycemia (8%), hypokalemia (8%), diarrhea (4%), peripheral neuropathy (4%), and hypernatremia (4%). The overall response rate (ORR) was 52% (12/23) with complete response (CR) rate 43% (10/23) and the partial response (PR) rate 9% (2/23). At the MTD, ORR was 53% (8/15) and CR 40% (6/15). In patients with TCL, ORR was 58% (10/17) and CR 47% (8/17). CRs were seen in AITL (6/6), PTCL-NOS (2/10) and DLBCL (2/6). PR was seen in PTCL-NOS (2/10). CRs were since in 3 pts refractory to their most recent therapy. The median progression free survival (mPFS) for all pts was 2.8 months (95% CI: 1.3-10.3) and median overall survival (mOS) was 10.4 months (95% CI: 2.8-33.4) and 10.4 months (95% CI: 1.7-N/A) and 3.3 months (95% CI: 1.2-30.4) respectively in TCL. The median duration of response for all patients was 5.8 months (range: 0.7 - 45.1). At the MTD, mPFS and mOS were 7.6 months (95% CI: 1.2-10.3) and 10.4 (95% CI: 1.7-20.8). 4 patients proceeded to transplant after study treatment (2 allogeneic and 2 autologous) and were censored at transplant. The median time to response was 6.0 weeks. Of others, who achieved a complete response: 2 remain in CR at 18.6 (PTCL) and 37.6 (AITL) months. Three others progressed after &gt;6 months: 45.1 mo (DLBCL), 29.5 mo (AITL), 9.0 mo (AITL). Conclusions: MTD was identified as romidepsin 10 mg/m2 in combination with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2, and dexamethasone 20 mg. There were no unexpected toxicities. The ORR and CR rates of this regimen are promising, particularly in AITL where 6/6 patients had a CR. Durable responses were seen in AITL, PTCL-NOS and DLBCL. Four patients have had responses for &gt;12 months, 4 proceeded to transplant, and 2 remissions are ongoing. Given the durable complete remissions seen in this difficult to treat patient population, this regimen warrants further study. Figure Disclosures Mehta-Shah: Verastem Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Innate Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Kiowa Hakka Kirin: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Roche/Genentech: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Riedell:Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding; Verastem: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Bartlett:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Forty Seven: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Genenetech: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Cashen:Celgene: Other: Speaker's Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Other: Speaker's Bureau; Novartis: Other: Speaker's Bureau. Kahl:ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy. Fehniger:Cyto-Sen Therapeutics: Consultancy; Horizon Pharma PLC: Other: Consultancy (Spouse). Carson:Flatiron Health, Inc., which is an independent subsidiary of the Roche Group: Employment, Research Funding; Roche: Equity Ownership.

Abstract Introduction: Cutaneous T- cell lymphoma (CTCL) is a rare form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Patients with CTCL suffer reduced quality of life from intractable itching and recurrent infections. Advanced stages have a poor prognosis. Mogamulizumab (Moga) is a monoclonal antibody directed against chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4), which is overexpressed on malignant T-cells. In a Phase I-II study in CTCL, Moga demonstrated a tolerable safety profile with a 37% overall response rate (ORR). Based on these results, MAVORIC [NCT01728805], an open-label, multinational, randomized, Phase III study, was initiated to compare Moga to vorinostat (Vor) in previously treated CTCL. This study is the largest randomized trial and the first pivotal trial to use progression-free survival (PFS) as a primary endpoint in CTCL. Methods: Adult patients with histologically confirmed mycosis fungoides (MF) or Sézary syndrome (SS) who had failed ≥1 systemic therapy were enrolled, stratified by disease type (MF or SS) and stage (IB/II or III/IV), and randomized 1:1 to Moga 1.0 mg/kg (weekly for the first 4-week cycle and then every 2 weeks) or Vor (400 mg daily). Patients randomized to Vor could crossover to Moga upon progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS in the randomized population using the global composite response (based on skin, blood, nodes and viscera) according to the ISCL/EORTC consensus guidelines. Sample size was calculated to provide 90% power to detect a 50% improvement in PFS. Key secondary endpoints included ORR, duration of response (DOR) and quality of life (QoL). Results: A total of 372 patients were randomized (Intent-to-Treat population) and had the following characteristics (Moga vs Vor): median age 63.5 yrs (25-101) vs 65.0 yrs (25-89); ECOG-PS 0-1, 184 (99%) vs 186 (100%); ECOG-PS 2, 2 (1%) vs 0; stage IB/IIA, 36 (19.4%) vs 49 (26.3%); stage IIB, 32 (17.2%) vs 23 (12.4%); stage III/IV, 118 (63.4%) vs 114 (61.3%); MF, 105 (56.5%) vs 99 (53.2%); SS, 81 (43.5%) vs 87 (46.8%). The median number of prior systemic treatments for both the Moga and Vor arms was 3. According to investigator assessment, treatment with Moga resulted in a significant improvement in PFS compared to Vor (HR 0.53 [95% CI: 0.41, 0.69], p&lt;0.0001) with a median PFS of 7.7 months (95% CI: 5.7, 10.3) for Moga and 3.1 months (95% CI: 2.9, 4.1) for Vor (Figure 1). Improvement in PFS was also demonstrated based on independent review (HR 0.64 [95% CI: 0.49, 0.84], p=0.0007): 6.7 months for Moga and 3.8 months for Vor. Moga was associated with superior PFS in predefined subgroups (Figure 2). Global ORR was significantly improved in the patients randomized to Moga at 28.0% vs 4.8% for Vor (p&lt;0.0001). ORR in predefined subgroups, DOR and response by disease compartment all favored Moga vs Vor (Table 1). Significant improvement in ORR was found with Moga vs Vor in patients with both MF (21.0% vs 7.1%, respectively; p=0.0042) and SS (37.0% vs 2.3%, respectively; p&lt;0.0001). An ORR of 30.1% was observed in Moga treated patients who crossed over from Vor. Patient-reported outcomes, as measured by the Skindex-29 and FACT-G, showed significantly greater symptom reduction and improved functional status in favor of Moga vs Vor in early cycles and throughout treatment (p&lt;0.05). The median dose intensity for Moga was 97.5% vs 95.7% for Vor, supporting adequate treatment in both arms. Treatment exposure was longer with Moga (median 170 vs 84 days for Vor). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; &gt;20%) that were more frequent (&gt;15% difference) in the Moga vs Vor arm included infusion-related reactions (33.2% vs 0.5%, respectively) and skin eruptions due to drug (23.9% vs 0.5%, respectively). The majority of TEAEs with Moga were mild to moderate in severity (grade I/II, 54.9%; grade III/IV/V, 42.4%). Common TEAEs reported more often with Vor vs Moga included diarrhea (61.8% vs 23.4%), nausea (42.5% vs 15.2%), thrombocytopenia (30.6% vs 11.4%), dysgeusia (29.0% vs 3.3%), and increased blood creatinine (28.0% vs 3.3%). Conclusions: In this first report of a randomized Phase III study evaluating PFS as primary endpoint in CTCL, Moga, a novel CCR4-targeting antibody therapy, demonstrated significantly superior PFS, ORR, and QoL compared to Vor in patients with previously treated CTCL. The safety profile was consistent with previous reports. This study supports Moga as a valuable new therapeutic option in patients with CTCL. Disclosures Kim: Eisai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Research Funding; Soligenix: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy, Research Funding; Neumedicine: Research Funding; miRagen: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Medivir: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyowa-Kirin-Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Horizon Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Forty Seven Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Tetralogic: Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bagot: Innate Pharma: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Actelion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyowa: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Horwitz: Kyowa-Hakka-Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy; ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; HUYA: Consultancy; Millenium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Aileron Therapeutics: Research Funding. Whittaker: Celgene: Honoraria; Galderma: Research Funding. Vermeer: Innate Pharma safety board for IPH4102-101: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zinzani: Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; J&J: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Verastem: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sokol: Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Kim: Kyowa Kirin Pharmaceutical Development, Inc.: Other: Clinical trials investigator; Solgenix: Other: Clinical trials investigator; Actelion: Consultancy; Cutaneous Lymphoma Foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; US Cutaneous Lymphoma Consortium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy. Ortiz-Romero: ACTELION: Consultancy; 4SC: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; MEDA: Research Funding. Eradat: Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Scarisbrick: 4SC: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Mallinckrodt: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Actelion: Consultancy. Elmets: NCI: Research Funding; Veterans Administration: Research Funding; California Wine Grape Assn: Research Funding; Solegenix: Research Funding; Idera: Research Funding; Elorac: Research Funding; Ferndale Labs: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding. Dalle: Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharmaceutical: Research Funding. Fisher: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Halwani: Amgen: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Genetech Inc.: Research Funding; Roche/Genentech Inc.: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squib: Research Funding; Kyowa Hikko Kirin: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Miragen: Research Funding. Poligone: Actelion Pharmaceutical: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Research Funding; Soligenix: Research Funding. Khot: Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Amgen: Other: Travel Grant. Moskowitz: Incyte: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Bristol Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Research Funding. Dwyer: Kyowa Kirin Pharmaceutical Development, Inc.: Employment. Moriya: Kyowa Kirin Pharmaceutical Development, Inc.: Employment. Humphrey: KYOWA KYRIN PHARMACEUTICAL DEVELOPMENT: Employment. Hudgens: Clinical Outcomes Solutions: Consultancy, Research Funding. Grebennik: Kyowa Kirin Pharmaceutical Development, Inc.: Employment. Tobinai: AbbVie: Research Funding; Chugai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Honoraria, Research Funding; Eisai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Zenyaku Kogyo: Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; HUYA Bioscience: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ono Pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Research Funding. Duvic: MDACC: Other: Safety Oversight Committee, Research Funding.

Abstract Introduction: Outcomes for patients with aggressive T cell lymphomas who are not cured by frontline therapies are poor. A Canadian retrospective analysis showed median overall survival (OS) to be 6.5 months combined for peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) patients in first relapse (Rel) and patients with primary refractory (Ref) disease (Mak, et al. JCO 2013). There have been no prospective studies that have examined the differences between Rel and Ref patients. In this analysis, we examined clinical features and outcomes for 285 patients prospectively enrolled in the COMPLETE Registry who completed frontline therapy and identified 119 patients with either Rel or Ref disease. We describe differences in clinical features, treatment, and outcomes between Rel and Ref patients. Methods: Patients with all subtypes of PTCL from 72 sites in the US were prospectively enrolled in the COMPLETE registry at initial diagnosis. Clinical and histopathologic features, treatment regimens, goals of therapy, toxicities, and outcomes were recorded. For this analysis, Ref disease was defined as no response to initial treatment or progression during or within 1 month of completing frontline therapy. Rel disease was defined as progression at least 1 month from completion of frontline therapy in patients who achieved a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Results: Of 285 patients in COMPLETE who had locked treatment and follow-up records required for this analysis, 50 met the criteria for Rel and 69 for Ref PTCL. Demographics (age, gender, race) and key clinical characteristics at initial diagnosis (histology [Table 1], bone marrow involvement, LDH, ECOG performance status) did not significantly differ between Rel and Ref patients. According to the treating physician, the primary goal of second-line therapy was cure in over half of both groups (52% for Rel, 60% for Ref); the remainder were managed with palliative intent. Rel patients received novel therapies (see Table 2 for definition) more frequently than Ref patients (58% vs. 28%) (P = 0.005) and were less likely to receive multi-agent regimens (24% vs. 45%; P = 0.04) [Table 2]. In the 55 Rel and Ref patients who received single-agent therapy, the most common agents were brentuximab vedotin (20%), romidepsin (15%), pralatrexate (9%) and gemcitabine (7%). In the 30 patients who received multi-agent therapy, the most common regimens were ICE (ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide) (17%), GemOx (gemcitabine and oxaliplatin) (17%), and CHOP or CHOP-like plus etoposide (13%). Despite similar frontline therapy with combination chemotherapy regimens, more Rel patients underwent high dose therapy and transplant compared to the Ref group (30% vs. 4%; P = 0.0005). Although single agent versus combination therapy showed similar objective response rates (ORR= CR+PR), the ORR of novel vs. traditional chemotherapy showed a trend favoring novel agents for the entire cohort (57% vs. 38%; P = 0.07). The ORR to second-line therapy was higher in Rel patients (63% vs. 38%; P = 0.02) as was the proportion achieving a CR (38% vs. 15%; P = 0.02). Further, Rel patients had longer OS compared Ref patients, with a median OS of 31 months (95% CI: 22.1 months to not reached) versus 10.2 months (95% CI: 6.5 - 15.9 months) from first diagnosis (Figure 1a) and 14.6 months versus 6.1 months (P = 0.048) from the time of relapse or progression (Figure 1b). For both Rel and Ref patients, there was no difference in survival by PTCL subtype. In both the Rel group and Ref groups, survival was significantly longer in patients treated with curative vs. palliative (as determined by the treating physician) intent (P = 0.01). Conclusions: Our analysis of real world outcomes in patients with aggressive T cell lymphomas demonstrates that outcomes are significantly worse for patients with Ref compared to those with Rel disease. Interestingly, novel single agent therapies were used most often as second-line therapy in Rel patients while multi-agent chemotherapy was used more frequently in Ref patients, despite the demonstration of activity of novel single agents in the Ref setting in other studies. The high proportion of patients with Rel or Ref disease in COMPLETE, and the demonstrated activity of novel agents in the Rel and Ref settings, supports initiatives to incorporate novel agents into frontline therapy for PTCL. Disclosures Lansigan: Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Teva: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy. Horwitz:Huya: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakka Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding. Pinter-Brown:Celgene: Consultancy; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy. Carson:American Cancer Society: Research Funding. Pro:Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Celegene: Honoraria. Hsi:Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Cellerant: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; HTG Molecular Diagnostics: Consultancy. Federico:MedNet Solutions: Consultancy. Gisselbrecht:Roche/Genentech: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Schwartz:MedNet Solutions: Employment. Bellm:Merck: Equity Ownership; Johnson & Johnson: Equity Ownership; BMS: Equity Ownership; MedNet Solutions: Consultancy, Other: Reimbursement of travel-related expenses. Acosta:Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Foss:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Eisai: Consultancy.

Abstract Background:PD-1 and PD-L1/PD-L2 are expressed by malignant T-cells in mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS). PD-1 is additionally expressed by tumor-infiltrating cytotoxic T-cells and PD-L1 is expressed by macrophages and other stromal components of the tumor microenvironment in these diseases. Moreover, reports of 9p24.1/PD-L2 translocation and CTLA4-CD28 fusion events in MF/SS support a genomic basis for immune evasion. Here, we explore the clinical activity of pembrolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis, in MF/SS. Methods:Patients (pts) with MF/SS stages IB-IV treated with at least 1 prior systemic therapy were enrolled in this phase 2, single-arm study coordinated by the Cancer Immunotherapy Trials Network (CITN). A Simon two-stage design was applied where stage 2 is initiated if 1 of 9 pts had an objective response. An additional 15 pts were planned in stage 2. Pembrolizumab was administered at 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks and treatment was allowed up to 2 years. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) as determined by the consensus global response criteria. Secondary endpoints were safety/tolerability, time to response (TTR), duration of response (DOR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Correlative biomarker studies included immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining for PD-L1, PD-L2, and multiple immune subsets as well as serum analysis of 62 cytokines and chemokines. Phenotypic and functional profiling of malignant and non-malignant immune cells will be performed by flow cytometry and mass cytometry (CyTOF). Results: The study completed enrollment and all 24 patients received at least one dose of pembrolizumab. Median age was 67 (range 44-85); 18 were male. Patients were advanced stage with 23 patients (96%) stage IIB or higher, including 15 patients (63%) with stage IVA SS. Most pts were heavily treated with a median of 4 prior systemic therapies (range 1-11). The median follow-up time was 40 weeks (range 9-60 weeks). The objective response rate (ORR) was 38% with 1 complete response (CR) and 8 partial responses (PR). Of the responding pts, 6 pts had 90% or greater improvement in skin disease as measured by mSWAT. An additional 9 pts (38%) had stable disease (SD). The median TTR was 11 weeks (range 8-41 weeks). Responses were durable with 8 of 9 (89%) responses currently ongoing at a median of 32 weeks of duration (4-46). The median PFS has not yet been reached, and the one-year PFS was 69%. There was no significant association between response and clinical characteristics including stage, disease type (MF vs. SS), and number of prior therapies, nor with skin tissue expression of PD-1, PD-L1, PD-L2, or infiltrating CD8+ T-cells as determined by IHC. Planned additional correlatives including CyTOF profiling, gene expression profiling, T cell receptor high throughput sequencing, multiplexed ion beam imaging (MIBI), and whole exome sequencing will explore potential predictive biomarkers of response. Adverse events (AE) were consistent with those seen in prior studies of pembrolizumab with the exception of an immune-mediated skin flare reaction seen in 6 pts (2 grade 2 and 4 grade 3). Skin flares occurred exclusively in patients with SS (6/15; 40%) and were associated with lower serum levels of the cytokines IL-7 and SCF prior to pembrolizumab treatment (p=0.01 and p=0.02 respectively, n.s. by Bonferroni correction). Pts with the skin flare reaction experienced increases in serum IFN-gamma, IL-12p40, IL-15, LIF, G-CSF, and CCL4 following treatment. There were two treatment related serious adverse events (SAE), both immune related. One pt experienced grade 2 pneumonitis which resolved with systemic corticosteroids. Another patient experienced grade 3 diarrhea secondary to steroid-refractory duodenitis. Conclusions: Pembrolizumab has significant clinical activity in pts with previously treated MF/SS. Responses were durable and were not associated with any identifiable clinical or pathologic characteristics. Treatment was well tolerated with a toxicity profile consistent with prior pembrolizumab studies, though 40% of pts with SS developed a notable skin flare reaction. These findings support further study of PD-1 blockade in the treatment of MF and SS. A phase 2 trial of pembrolizumab in combination with interferon-gamma is being developed based on these results. Disclosures Porcu: Millenium: Other: investigator in a clinical trial; miRagen: Other: Investigator in a clinical trial; celgene: Other: Investigator in a clinical trial; Innate Pharma: Other: Investigator in a clinical trial. Foss:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Eisai: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Moskowitz:Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Research Funding. Sokol:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Spectrum: Consultancy. Yearley:Merck: Employment. Chartash:Merck: Employment. Townson:Merck: Employment. Horwitz:Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Huya: Consultancy; Infinity: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakka Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding. Kim:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Other: Investigator in a clinical trial; Merck: Other: Investigator in a clinical trial; Neumedicine: Consultancy; Soligenix: Consultancy; Galderma: Consultancy; Genentech: Other: Investigator in a clinical trial; Innate Pharma: Other: Investigator in a clinical trial; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Millenium: Consultancy, Other: Investigator in a clinical trial; Eisai: Consultancy, Other: Investigator in a clinical trial; Actelion: Consultancy, Other: Investigator in a clinical trial; Celgene: Consultancy; MiRagen: Consultancy; Horizon: Consultancy.

Chemotherapies for cancers induce granulocytopenia and additively increase the risk of infection. Infections in patients with granulocytopenia, especially neutropenia, have remained as a major problem. Though granulocyte transfusion therapy (GTX) is a therapeutic option against neutropenic infections refractory to supportive therapies, GTX has not been in wide use mainly due to its physical burden on donors. We have previously reported the establishment of genetically engineered hematopoietic progenitors priming neutrophils (NeuP-HPCs) from human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) by inducible expression of c-MYC and BMI1, which cultured on OP9 feeder cells, kept expanding until 12 weeks after the induction and were differentiated into functional neutrophils four days after silencing c-MYC and BMI1. In the current study, we sophisticated the previous production system and established a robust and feeder-free production system of neutrophils, for the purpose of donor-free GTX. To enhance the expandability of NeuP-HPCs to be preferably applied in clinical settings, we investigated genes enhancing the expandability of NeuP-HPCs. we performed single-cell analysis of focused 83 transcriptional factors in HPCs and identified the population committing neutrophils in early phase, which enriched the expression of BCL6, CEBPB, CEBPD, and LITAF. As CEBPB provided the two-weeks extension of the expandability among four genes and had a lot of target genes, we conducted the search for target genes of CEBPB which purely enhanced the expandability. Motif analysis of CEBPB revealed that BCL2A1 was the gene associated with the cell proliferation in top-ranked ten target genes, suggesting that BCL2 family genes enhanced the expandability of NeuP-HPCs. Consistent with the result, the expression of BCL2A1, BCL-XL or MCL1, which were the major BCL2 family genes in the development of myeloid cells, enhanced the expandability and kept expanding for at least 16 weeks, indicating that one NeuP-HPC was estimated to generate thousands aliquot of 5.0 x 1010 cells, clinically meaningful scale, in 10 weeks. Notably, NeuP-HPCs expressing BCL-XL (NeuP-HPCs-XL) achieved the feeder-free expansion, suggesting that NeuP-HPCs-XL were preferable to clinical application. Whereas the constitutive expression of BCL2 family genes inhibited the neutrophilic differentiation, NeuP-HPCs-XL with the inducible expression of c-MYC, BMI1, and BCL-XL generated the functional neutrophils, which showed expression of neutrophil-specific markers, CD16b and CD66b, formed toxic granules with lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and produced reactive oxygen species (ROS) with phorbol-12-myristate-13 acetates (PMA). Gene expression profiling by RNA sequence comparing the neutrophils with or without LPS revealed the activation of NF-kB pathway, which was the critical pathway through LPS stimulation. Furthermore, the neutrophils with LPS stimulation recapitulated the expression profile of peripheral blood in patients with gram-negative sepsis. Gene ontology enrichment analysis showed the enrichment of inflammatory response, innate immune response, cytokine activity (including higher expression of IL1A, IL1B, IL6 and TNFa), cell adhesion (including higher expression of ICAM1, also a functional marker of phagocytosis) and chemotaxis (including higher expression of CXCL2, CXCL8, CCL19 and CCL20) with LPS stimulation. These findings indicated that the neutrophils from NeuP-HPCs-XL harbored the principal neutrophil functions including adhesion, chemotaxis, phagocytosis, ROS generation and cytokine production. To assess the function of neutrophils from NeuP-HPCs-XL in vivo, we performed in vivo imaging of the neutrophils expressing luciferase in the mice model of LPS-induced inflammation. In NSG mice harboring the local inflammation induced by intraperitoneal injection of LPS, intraperitoneally administrated neutrophils aggregated specifically at the inflammation site and showed the persistent survival for 72 hours, in marked contrast to the diffuse distribution and the shorter survival for 24 hours in NSG mice without LPS injection. These findings suggested that neutrophils from NeuP-HPCs-XL were functional in vivo. In summary, we achieved the feeder-free and robust production of neutrophils with the functional capacity in vivo. NeuP-HPCs-XL are potential sources of neutrophils for donor-free GTX. Figure Disclosures Miyauchi: Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co. Ltd.: Research Funding. Iwasaki:Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co. Ltd.: Employment. Kawagoshi:Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co. Ltd.: Employment. Kagoya:Nihon Shinyaku: Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Speakers Bureau. Kurokawa:Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Teijin Limited: Research Funding; Shire Japan K.K.: Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Chugai Pharmaceutical Company: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.: Speakers Bureau; Bioverativ Japan ltd.: Consultancy; MSD K.K.: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene K.K.: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Boehringer Ingelheim: Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo Conpany: Speakers Bureau; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co.,Ltd.: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.: Speakers Bureau; Shionogi & Co., Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astellas Pharma Inc.: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Yakult Honsha Company: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer Japan Inc.: Research Funding; Eisai Co., Ltd.: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis Pharma K.K.: Research Funding.

Abstract Background Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) encompass ~10-15% of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP), or variations thereof, are the most commonly used treatment regimens with complete remission (CR) rates ranging from 39-55% (Reimer 2009, d'Amore 2012). With the exception of low international prognostic index (IPI)-anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive ALCL, with 4-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) ranging from 25-35% and 30-40%, respectively (Ellin 2014). We previously reported the results of this phase 1 trial that evaluated brentuximab vedotin (BV) administered in sequence with CHOP, or in combination with CHP (CHOP without vincristine) in treatment-naive patients (pts) with CD30-expressing PTCL (NCT01309789). The combination therapy (BV+CHP) showed safety and activity at standard doses, with an objective response rate (ORR) of 100% and complete response (CR) rate of 88% (Fanale 2014). The most common adverse events (AEs) experienced by pts were nausea and peripheral sensory neuropathy (69% each). Four-year durability data and updated results on peripheral neuropathy (PN) resolution from the BV+CHP combination treatment arm are presented herein. Methods Adults with CD30-expressing PTCL, including systemic ALCL (anaplastic large cell lymphoma, ALK-negative, or ALK-positive with IPI score ≥2) were eligible for this study. CD30 expression for non-ALCL pts was defined as ≥1% CD30 expression in malignant cells. Pts on the combination treatment arm received 1.8 mg/kg BV and standard-dose CHP q3wk for up to 6 cycles. Pts who achieved at least a partial response (PR) following treatment could receive continued BV 1.8 mg/kg q3wk as single-agent for up to 10 additional cycles. Antitumor response was assessed by the investigator according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2007). Results Twenty-six previously untreated pts received BV+CHP. Disease diagnoses included systemic ALCL (n=19; including ALK-negative, n=16 and ALK-positive, n=3), PTCL-NOS (n=2), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL, n=2), adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL, n=2), and enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL, n=1). Twenty-one of the 26 pts who achieved remission with combination treatment continued on to receive single-agent BV. Overall, the 26 pts received a median of 13 cycles (range, 3 to 16) of BV. After a median observation period of 52 months (range 4.6 to 58.3) from first dose, 18 pts remain on study. The estimated 4-year PFS and OS rates are 52% (95% CI: 31, 69) and 80% (95% CI: 59, 91), respectively. The median PFS has not been reached (95% CI: 12.3, -). To date, 15 of 19 ALCL (3/3 ALK-positive, 12/16 ALK-negative), and 6 of 7 non-ALCL pts were alive at last follow-up. Five pts (19%) received subsequent treatment with single-agent BV in long-term follow-up and 3 pts received stem cell transplants (1 autologous, 2 allogeneic) for relapsed disease. There were no pts who underwent a consolidative stem cell transplant. Of the 26 pts treated with combination therapy, 19 (73%) experienced PN. Of these pts, 95% (18 of 19) experienced complete resolution (8 pts), or some resolution or improvement (defined as a decrease by at least 1 grade from worst grade, 10 pts). Of the pts who experienced improvement, 1 pt each improved from Grade 3 to a lowest Grade 2 and from Grade 3 to a lowest Grade 1, and 5 pts improved from Grade 2 to a lowest Grade 1. The median time to resolution of PN symptoms was 5.7 months. Eleven pts had ongoing neuropathy at last follow-up, of which, 9 pts had Grade 1 severity and 2 pts had Grade 2. Conclusions These 4-year durability results demonstrate that among pts with PTCL, initial therapy with BV in combination with CHP can induce long-term remissions with a tolerable safety profile. A phase 3 randomized trial comparing BV+CHP with CHOP for the frontline treatment of CD30-expressing PTCL is ongoing (NCT01777152). Progression-free Survival Figure Figure. Disclosures Horwitz: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity: Research Funding; Huya: Consultancy; FortySeven: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakka Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding. Forero-Torres:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Bartlett:Gilead: Consultancy. Pro:Takeda: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Celegene: Honoraria. Chen:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding. Davies:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel to scientific conferences, Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Bayer: Research Funding; Karyopharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Illidge:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.: Consultancy, Honoraria. Uttarwar:Seattle Genetics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Huebner:Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ren:Seattle Genetics: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Abstract Recently nonmyeloablative, haplo-identical T-cell replete bone marrow transplantation using high-dose cyclophosphamide (CY) post-BMT to control GVHD and prevent graft rejection by inducing bi-directional tolerance was reported. This strategy resulted in promising outcomes with low transplantation-related mortality (TRM) due to a low incidence of GVHD and infectious disease. However, the high relapse rate remained a major problem in high-risk hematological disease. We therefore planned a prospective pilot study of myeloablative or reduced intensity HLA haplo-identical allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) using reduced doses of CY post-transplantation, followed by administration of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) instead of bone marrow, for those with a poor-prognosis or refractory leukemia and MDS. As of 30 June 2013, 17 patients had been enrolled in this prospective pilot study. Patients with a poor prognosis or refractory leukemia and MDS requiring prompt HCT were eligible for this study if they lacked a donor who was serologically HLA-identical or had a single antigen mismatch. The conditioning regimen consisted of fludarabine 15 mg/m2 and cytarabine 2.0 g/ m2 twice a day on days -11 and -10, thymoglobulin 2.0 mg/kg on days -8 and -7, and fludarabine 30 mg/ m2/day with intravenous busulfan 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -6 to -3 (n=11) or melphalan 100 mg (n=6) on day -2. Nine patients received a single dose of 25 mg/kg CY on day 3 and eight patients, double doses of 25 mg/kg CY on days 3 and 4 post-peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT). Tacrolimus and oral mycophenolate mofetil was started after the completion of high-dose CY post-HCT. The median age of patients was 42 years (range 18–65). Disease diagnoses included AML (n=14), ALL (n=2) and MDS (n=1). In 12 (71%) of 17 patients, disease status was non-remission, with active disease at the time of PBSCT. Eight (47%) of 17 patients had a history of prior HCT. Donors were partially HLA-mismatched (haplo-identical) first degree relatives of the patients and differed from the patients at a median of 3/8 HLA loci in both the HVG and GVH directions. All patients received G-CSF-mobilized, unmanipulated PBSC containing a median of 3.0 x 106 CD34+cells/kg and 1.4 x 108CD3+T-cells/kg. Non-infectious fever due to PBSC infusion occurred in 14 (82%) patients and persisted until day 2 in most patients. Except for one patient who died soon after PBSCT due to disease progression, full donor T-cell chimerism was achieved at day 30 following PBSCT in all patients. Nine of 17 developed grade II-III acute GVHD. None developed grade IV acute GVHD. Three of nine patients receiving a single dose of CY, but only one of eight patients receiving double doses of CY developed grade III acute GVHD. In 12 of 16 evaluable patients, CMV reactivation was observed by day 100. Three patients developed CMV disease. BK virus cystitis occurred in four of eight patients receiving double doses of CY, however, none receiving a single dose of CY post-PBSCT developed BK virus cystitis. The cumulative incidence of TRM at one year was 13%. At one year, the overall survival of all patients, and the percentages of patients in remission and those with active disease were 43%, 75% and 31%, respectively. The results of our study demonstrated that our HLA haplo-identical transplantation using high-dose CY post-PBSCT resulted in a low incidence of TRM and was feasible even in patients with high-risk acute leukemia and MDS as an alternative stem cell source. Of note, the dose of CY post-PBSCT affected the incidence of both BKV cystitis and severe GVHD. The optimal dose of CY following HLA haplo-identical PBSCT and preparative regimen should be further explored to establish a standard regimen. Disclosures: Nakamae: Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Honoraria, Travel/accommodations/meeting expenses, Travel/accommodations/meeting expenses Other; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma, Inc.: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau, Travel/accommodations/meeting expenses Other. Off Label Use: Mycophenolate mofetil was used as one of drugs for acute GVHD prophylaxis. Koh:Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma, Inc.: Travel/accommodations/meeting expenses Other. Nishimoto:Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma, Inc.: Travel/accommodations/meeting expenses Other. Nakashima:Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma, Inc.: Travel/accommodations/meeting expenses Other. Nagasaki:Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma, Inc.: Travel/accommodations/meeting expenses Other. Nakane:Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma, Inc.: Speakers Bureau, Travel/accommodations/meeting expenses Other. Nakamae:Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma, Inc.: Research Funding, Travel/accommodations/meeting expenses Other. Hino:Sanofi K.K.: Honoraria; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Honoraria; Nippon Shinyaku Co.,Ltd.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel/accommodations/meeting expenses Other.

Background: Treatment strategies for patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (RR) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) continue to evolve as brentuximab vedotin (BV) and immune checkpoint inhibitors are utilized in pre-transplant salvage regimens. These new approaches are based on promising results of non-randomized trials, but it is not clear how they perform outside of clinical studies. We aimed to investigate selection patterns, toxicities, and outcomes of salvage regimens prior stem cell transplant (SCT) used currently in the United States for pts with RR cHL in the non-trial setting. Methods: We conducted a multisite, retrospective study of pts with RR cHL who were treated with a first salvage regimen (salvage 1) with intent to proceed to SCT within the past 5 years. Only pts who were treated outside of a clinical trial with salvage 1 were included. Responses were based on treating physician assessment using Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson et al, JCO 2014). Kaplan Meier survival curves were generated using STATA 15.0 software. Results: We identified 160 pts with diagnosis of RR cHL from 6 U.S. centers who received salvage 1 in the non-trial setting between January 2013 and January 2018. The pts' characteristics are described in Table 1. Both primary refractory pts (41%) and those with relapsed disease (59%) were included. The most common salvage 1 regimen for RR cHL was ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide (ICE) in 68% followed by BV monotherapy (14%) and BV+bendamustine (9%). Only 1 pt (1%) received immune checkpoint inhibitor. There were no statistically significant factors that would increase likelihood of receiving BV-containing salvage 1 including primary refractory status, age, and advanced stage. In the cohort of 59 pts who required more than one line of salvage therapy, the most common second salvage regimen (salvage 2) was BV monotherapy (42%), followed by various BV-containing combinations (22%), and ICE (19%). Only 14% of pts received 3 or more lines of salvage therapy prior to SCT. Out of 107 pts who received ICE as salvage 1, 33% were administered second salvage while out of 35 pts who received BV-containing regimen as salvage 1, 53% required salvage 2 (X2=4.7, p=0.03). Of 148 pts who ultimately underwent SCT, 52% were exposed to BV and 12% to an immune checkpoint inhibitor as part of any salvage regimen at some point prior to SCT. Response assessment to salvage 1 were available for 154 pts; 47% pts achieved complete response (CR), 30% partial response (PR), and 19% had progressive disease (PD). The responses to specific salvage 1 regimens are summarized in Table 2. For those pts undergoing salvage 2, 48% achieved CR, 19% PR and 30% had PD. Radiation was administered to 11% of pts at any point of salvage treatment prior SCT. In terms of toxicities, there were no deaths attributed to complications from any of the salvage therapies. When compared to ICE, pts undergoing BV or BV+bendamustine as salvage 1 had lower risk of neutropenic fever (0% vs 7%) and GI toxicities (10% vs 18%), but had higher risk of experiencing peripheral neuropathy (5% vs 15%). Out of 148 pts who ultimately underwent SCT, the majority had autologous (96%) and 6 (4%) pts had allogeneic SCT. The majority (73%) of patients were in CR immediately prior SCT. Four pts (3%) died due to SCT-related toxicities. BV maintenance was used in 35% of pts. Exposure to BV during salvage 1 prior SCT did not affect the likelihood of receiving BV maintenance. While there was no statistically significant difference in progression free survival (PFS) between chemotherapy only and BV-containing salvage 1, there was a trend toward improved PFS with BV-containing salvage 1 as shown in Figure 1. The 2-year PFS for chemotherapy only salvage 1 was 71% (95% CI: 60-79%) vs. 80% (95% CI: 60-91%) for BV-containing salvage treatments. Conclusion: Growing number of salvage regimens are used in RR cHL. In the current practice outside of clinical trials, 23% of RR cHL pts received BV during salvage 1. In total, 37% received more than one salvage treatment and 52% received BV as part of salvage therapy prior SCT. It is unlikely that a prospective randomized trial will be conducted to compare various salvage treatment options. However, further analysis of sub-populations who may benefit from a particular regimen or optimal treatment sequences may lead to more effective and less toxic treatment strategies for pts with RR cHL. Disclosures Svoboda: Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Kyowa: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy. Andreadis:Genentech: Equity Ownership, Other: Spouse is Employee; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy. Feldman:Portola Pharma: Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Research Funding; Viracta: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Speakers Bureau; Kite Pharma: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Research Funding; Corvus: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Cell Medica: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Khan:Back Bay Life Science Advisors: Honoraria; ASCO/Conquer Cancer Foundation sponsored by Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Moskowitz:ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Consultancy; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Cell Medica: Consultancy; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cell Medica: Consultancy; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Cell Medica: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Portell:Roche/Genentech: Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Acerta/AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; AbbVie: Research Funding; Infinity: Research Funding. Dwivedy Nasta:Merck: Consultancy, Other: data safety monitorin; 47 (Forty Seven): Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Rafael: Research Funding; Debiopharm: Research Funding; Aileron: Research Funding; ATARA: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Millenium/takeda: Research Funding. Landsburg:Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Curis, INC: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Curis, INC: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding; Triphase: Research Funding; Triphase: Research Funding. Barta:Mundipharma: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Honoraria; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Chong:Tessa: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy. Schuster:Acerta: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Nordic Nanovector: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Loxo Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Patents & Royalties: Combination CAR-T and PD-1 Inhibitors, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Brentaximab vedotin containing salvage in Hodgkin lymphoma

Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation (HCT) is frequently considered for patients (pts) with relapsed T-cell lymphoma (TCL) and less often as consolidation of initial therapy. Outcomes from prior registry data show that only 31% of pts remain disease free 3 years after HCT (Smith et al. JCO 2013). However, several single institution studies have superior outcomes. We previously presented an analysis of allogeneic transplant in T-cell lymphoma but have expanded this effort to 12 academic centers with longer follow up (Mehta-Shah ASH 2017). Methods: We analyzed the patient characteristics at time of diagnosis and transplant, treatment history, overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in consecutive TCL pts who had an HCT from 1/1/2000-12/31/2019 at 12 academic institutions. Results: Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. 508 pts were identified with median age 51 years (16 - 72). 452 (86.5%) had known remission status at the time of HCT: 245 (54.4%) complete remission (CR), 168 (37.2%) partial remission (PR), 23 (5.0%) stable disease (SD), 16 (3.2%) progressive disease (PD). Seventy-eight (15.5%) had a prior autologous HCT. Thirty-six (7%) pts underwent HCT in CR1, 352 (69%) for relapsed/refractory TCL, and was not specified in 120 pts (24%). The median HCT comorbidity index (HCT-CI) score was 1 (0-11). Conditioning regimens were myeloablative (n=180), reduced intensity/non-myeloablative (n=323), unknown (n=3). Donor type was known for 471 pts: 192 matched related (MRD), 183 matched unrelated (MUD), 53 mismatched (MMD), 18 haploidentical donors, 25 umbilical cord blood. In this series, the 2 year OS and PFS rate following HCT were 59.1% (95%CI: 54.6-63.3%) and 45.8% (95%CI: 41.3-50.2%) respectively. 5 year OS and PFS rate were 50.8% (95%CI: 46.1-55.3%) and 39.4% (95%CI: 34.9-43.9%) (Fig 1) For disease specific 2-year and 5-year PFS, see Table 1. At a median follow-up of 29.7 mo (0.1-263 mo), 163 pts had relapsed and 261 pts had died. The median time from relapse post HCT to death was 10.2 mo (0-158.4 mo). Of 261 deaths: 81 were due to transplant related mortality (TRM), 69 were confirmed to be from TCL, and 111 were from non-relapse mortality/unknown. There was not a significant difference in PFS for pts with AITL, PTCL-NOS, ALK positive ALCL or ALK negative ALCL, with median PFS of 23.2 mo (95%CI:15.3-64.2). However, when AITL was compared specifically to PTCL-NOS or ALCL, those with AITL had a trend towards improved median PFS (51.4 mo vs. 18.4 mo, p=0.14) and improved median OS (not reached vs. 73.1 mo, p=0.26). At 5 years, PFS was worse for CTCL (18.6%, 95% CI: 9.7%-30.0%) compared to PTCL subtypes (43.8%; 95% CI: 37.3%-50.0%)(p&lt;0.001) . However, 5-year OS was similar for CTCL (44.0%, 95% CI: 30.1-56.4%) and PTCL (53.1%, 95% CI: 46.5-59.3%) (p=0.46). The rate of TRM at 1 year was 11.2% (95%CI:8.5%-14.0%). Of evaluable pts, 245/489 (46%) had acute GvHD and 192/473 (40.6%) had chronic GvHD. There were no differences in TRM according to recipient age (p=0.47). Higher HCT-CI was associated with an increased risk of TRM (HR 1.15, 95% CI: 1.031-1.286; p=0.012) Disease status at the time of HCT was associated with PFS (p&lt;0.001). Median PFS for those with CR (n=239), PR (n=164), SD (n=22) or PD (n=14) were 44.6 mo, 8.6 mo, 21 mo, 3.5 mo respectively. Degree of donor match was associated with cumulative TRM (p=0.0241). For pts who underwent MRD, MUD, or MMD HCT, cumulative TRM at 12 months was 8% (95%CI: 5.5-12.2%), 13.1% (95%CI: 9.7-17.8%), 14.7% (95%CI: 8.7-24.6%). Conclusions: We present the largest series of HCT in TCL. In this dataset, HCT provided durable disease control for a significant portion of pts with relapsed or refractory or otherwise high risk TCL. Depth of response to therapy immediate prior to HCT was associated with PFS. Patients with AITL appeared to have a trend towards improved outcome with HCT compared to other common PTCL histologies. Patients with CTCL had a higher rate of relapse compared to PTCL subtypes, but OS was similar. MRD HCTs were associated with lower TRM. This data supports the curative potential of HCT in a patient group with otherwise poor survival and limited treatment options. Disclosures Mehta-Shah: Corvus: Research Funding; Genetech/Roche: Research Funding; Verastem: Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Bristol Myers-Squibb: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; C4 Therapeutics: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy; Innate Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Dahi:Kite: Consultancy. Sauter:Sanofi-Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite - a Gilead Company: Consultancy; Spectrum Pharamaceuticals: Consultancy; Gamida Cell: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Genmab: Consultancy; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Moskowitz:Merck: Research Funding; Imbrium Therapeutics, L.P.: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Miragen Therapeutics: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Jacobsen:Novartis: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-LaRoche: Research Funding; Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy; Acerta: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy. William:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Dova: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria. Barta:Monsanto: Consultancy; Pfizer: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Atara: Honoraria. Allen:Clinical Care Options: Speakers Bureau; Curio Sciences: Honoraria; Research to Practice: Speakers Bureau; Imbrium: Consultancy, Other; Bayer: Consultancy, Other. Song:Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen, Celgene,Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Otsuka: Honoraria. Ruan:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding. McKinney:Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Kite/Gilead, Seattle Genetics, Molecular Templates, BTG, Pharmacyclics, Verastem, Genentech, Inc., Celgene: Consultancy; UNUM, Molecular Templates, Incyte, Beigene, Denovo Biopharma, Pharmacyclics, Nordic Nanovector, BMS, Genentech, Inc., Celgene: Research Funding. Beaven:Tessa Therapeutics: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; MorphoSysAb: Research Funding; LoxoOncology: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Haverkos:Viracta THerapeutics: Consultancy. Alpdogan:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Kiowa Kirin: Consultancy. Porcu:Kiowa Kirin: Research Funding; Kura Oncology: Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Galderma: Research Funding; Daiichi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Research Funding; Cell Medica: Research Funding; Miragen: Research Funding; Verastem: Consultancy; Viracta Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Horwitz:Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Myeloid Therapeutics: Consultancy; Miragen: Consultancy; ADCT Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Aileron: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Forty Seven: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity/Verastem: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakka Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millenium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Trillium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Corvus: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Portola: Consultancy, Research Funding; Beigene: Consultancy; C4 Therapeutics: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Vividion Therapeutics: Consultancy; Affirmed: Consultancy; ASTEX: Consultancy.

Background: SYK and JAK signaling pathways may be critical mediators in the pathogenesis of peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). SYK expression is observed in these malignant cells, and pre-clinical data suggest it acts as an oncogenic driver possibly by mediating chronic T-cell antigen receptor-independent signaling. Consistently, transgenic expression of constitutively active SYK in CD4+ T cells in mice results in a lethal T-cell proliferative disease, while its expression in B cells did not result in clonal expansion. Moreover, evidence for JAK/STAT pathway involvement in these diseases has been demonstrated by gene expression profiling, and frequent activating mutations to common γ chain, JAK1, JAK3, or STAT5b are observed in PTCL. Malignant T-cell clones from CTCL patients secrete a host of Th2 cytokines (IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, and IL-13) and exhibit deregulation of the IL-2 receptor signaling pathway. These cytokines induce JAK/STAT signaling, which may promote T-cell proliferation and survival. Overall, the data suggest that dual inhibition of SYK and JAK may perturb multiple and independent survival mechanisms implicated in PTCL and CTCL. Cerdulatinib is a small-molecule reversible ATP competitive inhibitor of SYK and JAK family members. Results of cerdulatinib single-agent 30 mg BID in a phase 2a dose expansion study in patients with PTCL and CTCL are reported here. Methods: Patients with relapsed/refractory PTCL or CTCL who received at least 1 prior systemic therapy were eligible to be treated with cerdulatinib at 30 mg orally BID. These expansion cohorts were enrolled in 2 stages: initially 20 patients accrued and, if ≥3 responses were observed, the cohort was expanded. The primary endpoint is response according to either the Lugano criteria (PTCL) or Global Assessment (CTCL). Patients are treated until progression, intolerance, or response adequate to allow stem cell transplantation. All patients receive antimicrobial prophylaxis (typically sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim [Bactrim]). Results: An interim analysis of 61 patients with PTCL and 37 with CTCL who received cerdulatinib as a single agent was performed on July 18, 2019. Patient characteristics: median (range) age: PTCL: 65 (21-85) years and CTCL: 62 (24-80) years; median prior systemic therapies: PTCL: 2 (1-12) and CTCL: 5 (1-16); refractory to last therapy: PTCL: 48% and CTCL: 62%. For PTCL and CTCL combined, 41% of patients received prior romidepsin, 5% received prior belinostat, 12% received prior pralatrexate, and 32% received prior brentuximab. In the PTCL cohort, 60 patients were evaluable for response (overall response rate [ORR] of 35%). Responses were primarily seen in AITL/TFH subtype (ORR of 55% [12 of 22], of which 41% of patients achieved a complete response [CR]). Responses have additionally been observed in patients with PTCL-NOS, ATLL, ALCL, and gamma-delta TCL. The ORR in CTCL patients was 35%, with the greatest activity observed in mycosis fungoides (ORR of 45%, of which 9% of patients achieved CR) versus Sezary syndrome (ORR of 17%, with no CR). Rapid improvements in pruritus have been observed in CTCL patients, independent of tumor response. Median duration of response is pending for both cohorts, but several patients have been in response for over a year. Among all patients, the most common (&gt;5% incidence) treatment-emergent grade 3+ adverse events were lipase increase (21%) and amylase increase (18%), diarrhea (8%), neutropenia (8%), anemia (7%), and fatigue (6%). Grade 3+ infections occurred in 29% of patients, which were generally managed by standard care. The amylase and lipase increases occurred without clinical pancreatitis and resolved irrespective of dose modification. Conclusion: Cerdulatinib has shown good tolerability and clinical activity in PTCL and CTCL. Complete and durable responses across a spectrum of PTCL and CTCL subtypes were observed. Correlative studies are aimed at identifying predictors of response and resistance. This phase 2a study will inform the design of a pivotal trial in T-cell lymphoma. Disclosures Horwitz: Aileron: Research Funding; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astex: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding; Miragen: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kura: Consultancy; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Affimed: Consultancy; Affimed: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kura: Consultancy; Trillium: Research Funding; Astex: Consultancy; Aileron: Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Miragen: Consultancy; Miragen: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Forty-Seven: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astex: Consultancy; ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Portola: Consultancy; ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding; ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy; Aileron: Research Funding; Aileron: Research Funding; Astex: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy; Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Miragen: Consultancy; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Affimed: Consultancy; Trillium: Research Funding; Kura: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kura: Consultancy; Portola: Consultancy; Affimed: Consultancy. Feldman:Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Speakers Bureau; Viracta: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Portola Pharma: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Research Funding; Cell Medica: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Corvus: Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Research Funding. Khodadoust:Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Kim:Eisai: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Neumedicine: Research Funding; Elorac: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Galderma: Research Funding; Corvus: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; miRagen: Research Funding; Medivir: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Soligenix: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Forty Seven Inc: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Horizon: Research Funding; Portola Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Munoz:AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics LLC an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Research Funding; Portola: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Fosunkite: Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Patel:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Exelixis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Phillips:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Consultancy; Abbvie: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Smith:Acerta Pharma BV: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb (spouse): Research Funding; Denovo Biopharma: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Portola Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Ignyta (spouse): Research Funding; Ayala (spouse): Research Funding; Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp: Consultancy, Research Funding. Smith:Portola Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Wilcox:Millenium/Takeda: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Birrell:Portola Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Leeds:Portola Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Conley:Portola Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Michelson:Portola Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Coffey:Portola Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership, Research Funding. Curnutte:Portola Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Background: In the daily practice, clinical effectiveness of pegfilgrastim compared to that of daily filgrastim in patients with malignant lymphoma is still unclear. This study aimed to clarify the effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim, using a national inpatient database in Japan. Study Design and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 18095 patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who received the first R-CHOP treatment between July 2007 and March 2017. Patients who received primary G-CSF prophylaxis were divided into pegfilgrastim group and filgrastim group. Outcomes included incidence of febrile neutropenia, all-cause in-hospital death, length of hospital stay, and total costs. To account for measured confounding, patients' characteristics were adjusted using two different propensity score utilizing methods: propensity score matching (PSM) and stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Instrumental variable (IV) analysis was also performed to account for unmeasured confounding. Results: We identified 1299 patients in the pegfilgrastim group and 2203 patients in the filgrastim group. FN occurred in 380 of the 3502 (11%) total patients with a median of 9 days (interquartile range [IQR] 7-10) after the initiation of the chemotherapy. All-cause in-hospital death occurred in 94 (2.7%) of 3502 patients. Median of hospital stay was 17 days (IQR 13-22), and total medical costs during hospitalization were 7300 (IQR 5700-9500) in USD. By one-to-one PSM, 1294 patients for both the pegfilgrastim and filgrastim groups were selected. Pegfilgrastim was administered 2 days (median, IQR 1-3) after the chemotherapy. Daily filgrastim administration was initiated 5 days (median, IQR 3-6) after the chemotherapy, and continued for 6 days (median, IQR 2-7). Compared with the filgrastim group, the pegfilgrastim group showed significant lower risk of the FN incidence (risk difference 6.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.1-8.1) and all-cause in-hospital mortality (risk difference 0.9%, 95% CI 0.05-1.8). In similar, stabilized IPTW showed that pegfilgrastim group was significantly associated with the lower risk of FN (risk difference 7.0%, 95% CI 5.1-8.9) and in-hospital mortality (risk difference 1.8%, 95% CI 0.9-2.7). In PSM, the length of hospital stay and total costs during hospitalization were also significantly decreased in the pegfilgrastim group compared to the filgrastim group (percent reduction 34% [95% CI 31-37], percent reduction 12% [95% CI 9-15], respectively). Stabilized IPTW also showed the significant percent reduction of the pegfilgrastim group to the filgrastim group for length of hospital stay and total costs (31% [95% CI 25-35], 19% [95% CI 13-24], respectively). In the sensitivity analyses, IV methods showed significantly lower FN susceptibility (odds ratio 0.14, 95% CI 0.07-0.26). However, pegfilgrastim was not associated with the reduction in susceptibility of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 0.93, 95% CI 0.23-3.70). The ratio of the pegfilgrastim group to the filgrastim group for length of hospital stay and total costs were 55% (95% CI 51-60) and 78% (95% CI 73-84), respectively. Conclusion: Pegfilgrastim contributed to lower susceptibility of FN. Total length of hospital stay and medical costs were also decreased in the pegfilgrastim group. Disclosures Jo: Tsumura: Other: Laboratory of joint program, Research Funding. Miyauchi:kyowa Kirin: Research Funding. Toyama:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd.: Speakers Bureau; Eisai Co., Ltd.: Speakers Bureau; Celgene K.K.: Speakers Bureau; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Speakers Bureau; Chugai Pharmaceutical Company: Speakers Bureau; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.: Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo Conpany: Speakers Bureau; ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.: Speakers Bureau. Kurokawa:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.: Speakers Bureau; Novartis Pharma K.K.: Research Funding; Yakult Honsha Company: Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo Conpany: Speakers Bureau; Eisai Co., Ltd.: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene K.K.: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Shire Japan K.K.: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer Japan Inc.: Research Funding; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co.,Ltd.: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Shionogi & Co., Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria; MSD K.K.: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Chugai Pharmaceutical Company: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astellas Pharma Inc.: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Teijin Limited: Research Funding; ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.: Speakers Bureau; Boehringer Ingelheim: Speakers Bureau; Bioverativ Japan ltd.: Consultancy.

Background: Pembrolizumab (PEM), an anti-PD-1 antibody is approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory cHL based on results of a pivotal trial demonstrating an overall response rate (ORR) of 69% and 22% complete response (CR) rate. To investigate the impact of PEM monotherapy in previously untreated patients (pts), we conducted a phase 2 clinical trial of sequential PEM followed by AVD chemotherapy for untreated cHL. Herein, we report the primary analysis of response (PET2) to single agent PEM in the frontline setting and the results of interim FDG18-FDG PET-CT (PET3) following AVD x 2. Methods: Pts &gt; 18 years of age with newly diagnosed cHL stages I-IV, including early stage pts with at least 1 risk factor according to NCCN criteria, were eligible. Pts were treated sequentially with 3 cycles of PEM at 200 mg every 3 weeks followed by an interim PET-CT (PET2) for primary analysis. Subsequently, pts received 4-6 cycles of AVD chemotherapy based on initial stage, with PET-CT's repeated after 2 cycles of AVD and at the end of therapy. There was no consolidative radiotherapy. Response to single agent PEM was assessed by Lugano criteria and decline in total metabolic tumor volume (TMV). We hypothesized that PEM monotherapy prior to AVD would result in a CR rate of 50% and would reduce the frequency of PET-positivity on the interim PET (PET3) following 2 cycles of AVD compared to prior reports. Results: Thirty pts enrolled from September 2017- March 2019 with a data cutoff of June 14, 2019. The median age of participants was 30 (range, 21-77), and 4 pts were ages &gt;60. Eleven were male, and the majority (83%) were Caucasian. Twelve pts had early unfavorable disease (6 each with elevated ESR, B-symptoms, and bulky mediastinal masses). Eighteen pts had advanced stage disease (5 Stage 3, 13 Stage 4; IPS score 3 -4 in 7, 1-2 in 10). Adverse risk factors for all 30 pts included bulky disease or large mediastinal mass (n=12), B-symptoms (n=14) and extranodal disease (n=16). Overall therapy was well tolerated and most adverse events were grade 1-2. Related events of any grade included hypertension (n=10), rash (n=9), anemia (n=8), infusion reactions (n=5), elevated liver function tests (n=5), arthralgias (n=4) and hypo- or hyperthyroidism (n=3). Grade 3 and 4 events (whether or not judged to be related) were as follows Gr3: lymphopenia (n=4), febrile neutropenia (n=3), neutropenia (n=3), hypertension (n=2), diarrhea (n=1), hyperglycemia (n=1), and hyponatremia (n=1); Gr 4: neutropenia (n=10); transaminitis (n=1); sepsis (n=1). The only Grade 3 or 4 immune-related adverse event was the one grade 4 transaminitis that resolved with steroid administration and a delay in therapy. Eleven of 30 pts achieved CR (37%; Deauville 1-3) following initial PEM monotherapy including three with large mediastinal masses. Four additional patients with bulky disease and four others had major reductions in disease following PEM monotherapy, but did not achieve CR by Lugano criteria (Fig 1A). To better characterize the depth of response, we quantitated the decline in total metabolic tumor volume (TMV) (Fig 1B). Eight of the 17 pts with &lt; CR to PEM monotherapy for whom TMV could be analyzed had &gt; 90% reduction in TMV. A single pt had an atypical response with clearance of original disease sites, but development of new sites that resolved after two cycles of AVD. Across all pts, the CR (Deauville 1-3) rate following 2 cycles of AVD, was 100%. Median follow up is 6.5 (range: 1 - 12) months among those who have completed therapy. No pt has required a change in treatment, relapsed, or progressed, with progression-free and overall survival rates both at 100%. Conclusion: Although the study did not meet its primary endpoint, our data demonstrate that 3 cycles of PEM is highly active in pts with newly diagnosed early unfavorable or advanced stage cHL. PEM monotherapy resulted in &gt; 90% reduction in TMV in the majority of pts, and when followed by AVD x's 2, CR in 100%. No pts have experienced progression or change of therapy to date and treatment was overall very well tolerated. This radiotherapy- and bleomycin-free approach warrants further investigation in larger trials to confirm response rates and assess efficacy compared with other novel combinations in the frontline setting. Disclosures Pro: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kyowa Hakka Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding. Karmali:Gilead/Kite; Juno/Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda, BMS: Other: Research Funding to Institution; Astrazeneca: Speakers Bureau. Gordon:Gilead: Other: Advisory Board; Juno/Celgene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Zylem LLC: Other: co-founder; research in nanoparticles in cancer; Bayer: Other: Advisory Board. Winter:Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Backgrounds Although bendamustine-plus rituximab therapy (BR) is considered as one of the standard therapy for several indolent B cell lymphomas, the optimal cycles of BR is not still uncovered. To elucidate the optimal cycles of BR, we performed a single center retrospective study of patients with indolent lymphoma treated with BR. Methods All patients with follicular lymphoma (n=40), lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (n=11) and mucosa associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma (n=6) who underwent BR in our institute in the period between April 2011 and September 2017 were included in this study. The clinical information including the number of repeated cycles, overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), laboratory findings, backgrounds, and the response to BR were analyzed retrospectively. Rituximab was administered at day 1 and bendamustine was administered at day 1 and 2, or 2 and 3, in each 28 days cycle. In the study cohort, the number of repeated cycles was allowed up to 6. The cessation of BR was allowed after 4 cycles in the patients with response to BR, according to the discretion of attending physicians. The dosage of bendamustine was reduced to 67% and 50% in 70 to 79 years and not less than 80 years, respectively. All patients in this study were prescribed trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole combination or pentamidine for the prevention of pneumocystis pneumonia, and acyclovir for the prevention of herpes zoster. Results In total 57 patients, the median age was 65 years (range, 37 to 83). Thirty four were male, and 23 were female. Three patients were newly diagnosed and 54 were relapsed or refractory patients. The median observation period was 51.7 months (5.1 to 83.6). The overall response rate was 86.0% (CR 54.4% and PR 31.6%). The median number of repeated cycles of BR was 4 (1 to 6). There was no significant correlation between patient characteristics and the number of repeated cycles of BR. All patients were stratified by their number of repeated cycles of BR. The early cessation group (n=17) was identified that the number was from 1 to 3, and the late cessation group (n=40) was identified that the number was from 4 to 6. The 5-year OS rates in early and late cessation groups were 56.1% and 87.0%, respectively. The 5-year PFS rates in early and late cessation groups were 31.4% and 50.6%, respectively. Both 5-year OS and PFS rates in late cessation group were significantly longer than that in early cessation group (p=0.011 and p<0.01, respectively). In late cessation group, the number of the patient who underwent 4 cycles of BR (4 cycles group) was 21, and the number of the patient who underwent 5 or 6 cycles of BR (over 4 cycles group) was 19. The 5-year OS rates in 4 cycles group and over 4 cycles group was 85.7% and 85.2%, respectively. There was no significant difference between these groups in the 5-year OS rates (p=0.58). The 5-year PFS rates in 4 cycles group and over 4 cycles group was 71.8% and 31.0%, respectively. The 5-year PFS rates in 4 cycles group were significantly longer than that in over 4 cycles group (p<0.01). The most common reason of the cessation of BR was adverse event (n=15). BR were stopped in 9 patients who achieved response after 4 or 5 cycles, and in 8 patients who became relapsed or refractory. Conclusions Our study indicated that the outcome of the patients with indolent lymphoma who stopped BR after 4 cycles was not inferior to that of the patients who stopped BR after 5 or 6 cycles. The results suggest that the cessation of BR after 4 cycles may be permissible in the patients with response to BR. Disclosures Toyama: Celgene K.K.: Speakers Bureau; Chugai Pharmaceutical Company: Speakers Bureau; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Speakers Bureau; ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.: Speakers Bureau; Eisai Co., Ltd.: Speakers Bureau; Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd.: Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo Conpany: Speakers Bureau; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.: Speakers Bureau. Nakamura:Astellas Pharma Inc.: Speakers Bureau. Kurokawa:Shionogi & Co., Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Chugai Pharmaceutical Company: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.: Speakers Bureau; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co.,Ltd.: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis Pharma K.K.: Research Funding; Eisai Co., Ltd.: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Boehringer Ingelheim: Speakers Bureau; Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.: Speakers Bureau; Yakult Honsha Company: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer Japan Inc.: Research Funding; Teijin Limited: Research Funding; Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Shire Japan K.K.: Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo Conpany: Speakers Bureau; Celgene K.K.: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; MSD K.K.: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astellas Pharma Inc.: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bioverativ Japan ltd.: Consultancy.

Introduction To date, various biochemical markers of bone remodeling have been investigated in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Serum C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (sICTP) is a well-known biochemical marker of bone remodeling. Although several reports showed the relationship between a high level of sICTP and poor prognosis in MM patients, little is known about the efficacy of bortezomib in high sICTP patients. In this single center retrospective study, we assessed the association between sICTP and the prognosis of plasma cell disorder patients, particularly in patients firstly treated with bortezomib-containing regimen. Methods We retrospectively reviewed untreated MM and other plasma cell disorder patients who were diagnosed at The University of Tokyo Hospital between January 2001 and December 2016. The clinical data of patients whose sICTP was measured before the start of first-line therapy were collected. Serum ICTP was measured at diagnosis in 59 patients: 56 patients with MM, 2 patients with plasmacytoma, and 1 patient with light chain amyloidosis. These patients were divided into high sICTP and low sICTP groups according to the median of sICTP level. Additionally, patients firstly treated with bortezomib-containing regimen were divided into two groups according to the median of sICTP level. Overall survival (OS) and bone fracture-free survival (FFS) were calculated from initiation of the first-line therapy using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests. Results In 59 patients, the median age was 65 years (range, 45-85 years) and median follow-up was 387 days (range, 22-2019 days). Thirty-three patients (55.9%) were male and 26 (44.1%) were female. IgG was the most frequent subtype of M-protein (58%), followed by IgA (19%), Bence Jones proteins (19%), and IgE (3%). International scoring system classified 16 (27.1%), 24 (40.7%), and 19 (32.2%) as stage I, II, and III, respectively. Levels of sICTP were high in 31 (52.5%) patients and low in 28 (47.4%) patients. The level of sICTP differed significantly (P<0.01) between the groups ISS stage I, II, and III, and increased parallel with the progression of the disease. Twenty-eight (47.4%) patients were administered bortezomib-containing regimen as first-line therapy, which was consisted of BD (bortezomib + dexamethasone), VCD (bortezomib + cyclophosphamide + dexamethasone), and VMP (bortezomib + melphalan + prednisolone). The remaining 31 (52.5%) patients were administered without proteasome inhibitors as first-line therapy. Nineteen patients (32.2%) achieved at least very good partial response after first-line therapy and 9 (15%) patients fractured after start of first-line therapy. Median OS for the entire cohort was 1874 days. In the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, high sICTP (above upper limit: 6.0 mg/l) significantly associated with worse 2-year OS (63% versus 96%, P=0.02) and worse 2-year FFS (51% versus 86%, P=0.04). Serum ICTP may be a useful marker to predict survival and future bone fracture in our cohort, and these results are consistent with previous reports. Interestingly, in the patients firstly treated with bortezomib-containing regimen, the level of sICTP had no effect on 2-year FFS (90% with high sICTP versus 100% with low sICTP, P=0.53) and 2-year OS (95% with high sICTP versus 100% with low sICTP, P=1). Conclusion In general, high sICTP is considered to be a poor prognostic factor in MM patients, and similar results were also demonstrated in our cohort. Importantly, our data suggest that bortezomib may overcome poor prognosis conferred by high sICTP in plasma cell disorder patients. Further studies based on more cases are warranted to elucidate the efficacy of bortezomib in high sICTP patients. In addition, further studies on other proteasome inhibitors, such as carfilzomib or ixazomib are also needed. Disclosures Honda: Hitachi, Ltd.: Speakers Bureau. Toyama:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.: Speakers Bureau; Eisai Co., Ltd.: Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Speakers Bureau; Celgene K.K.: Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo Conpany: Speakers Bureau; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Speakers Bureau; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.: Speakers Bureau; Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd.: Speakers Bureau; Chugai Pharmaceutical Company: Speakers Bureau. Kurokawa:Shire Japan K.K.: Speakers Bureau; Novartis Pharma K.K.: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo Conpany: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer Japan Inc.: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.: Speakers Bureau; Celgene K.K.: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Boehringer Ingelheim: Speakers Bureau; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co.,Ltd.: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astellas Pharma Inc.: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Yakult Honsha Company: Speakers Bureau; Bioverativ Japan ltd.: Consultancy; Chugai Pharmaceutical Company: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Eisai Co., Ltd.: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; MSD K.K.: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Shionogi & Co., Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria; Teijin Limited: Research Funding; Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.: Speakers Bureau.

Abstract Background: Adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL) is a highly aggressive peripheral T-cell neoplasm caused by human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1). Although most patients respond to initial therapy, relapse is inevitable and the overall prognosis is dismal. Therefore, we developed a novel immune therapy consisting of autologous dendritic cells (DC) pulsed with Tax peptides (ATL-DC-101) to prevent relapse. The used peptides are corresponding to the major epitopes of HTLV-1 Tax-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) that potentially act as anti-ATL effectors. Mogamulizumab is an anti-CCR4 antibody, which binds to ATL cells and regulatory T cells. A preceding pilot study suggested the safety of ATL-DC-101 monotherapy, and then we conducted a phase Ia/Ib study to investigate safety and efficacy of ATL-DC-101 combined with mogamulizumab. Methods: ATL patients pretreated and stable for at least 4 weeks were enrolled. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were obtained by apheresis and differentiated into DC, which was pulsed with Tax-peptides. The study consisted of 2 cohorts, i.e., Ia and Ib phase, in which patients were assigned ATL-DC-101 monotherapy and ATL-DC-101 combined with mogamulizumab, respectively. The protocol consisted of three subcutaneous injections of ATL-DC-101 at 2-week intervals. Mogamulizumab was administered once before ATL-DC-101 in Ib phase. The primary endpoint of the study was to evaluate safety and feasibility of ATL-DC-101. The secondary endpoints were anti-tumor effects, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and time to next treatment, estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. The safety and disease status were accessed at day 56 and followed until 2 years. Results: Six aggressive ATL patients who were in stable condition by previous therapies were enrolled in this study from 2015 to 2016. Frequent DC- related toxicities were mild injection site reaction (n=5, 83.3%), decreased WBC count (n=3, 50%), and liver damage (n=2, 33.3%), all of which were grade 1 or 2. Notably, 2 patients (1 in each cohort) with partial response (PR) after chemotherapy were converted into complete response (CR) after ATL-DC-101. The 2-year PFS and OS were both 83.3%. All three patients who received ATL-DC-101 monotherapy (Ia) maintained CR for more than two years. Although one patient in phase Ib developed progressive disease after one year, the other two patients remained in CR. Interestingly ATL cells in a relapsed case harbored deletion of Tax gene, which resulted in the loss of the target peptide presentation. After a median follow-up of 29 months, 5/6 patients are alive without any additional chemotherapy after ATL-DC-101. Conclusions: ATL-DC-101 was well tolerated and successfully maintained CR more than 2 years in 5/6 patients irrespective of additional mogamulizumab, indicating that this therapy could be a safe and effective long-lasting maintenance therapy even for elderly ATL patients. Currently, we are preparing Phase II trial to confirm anti-tumor effects of ATL-DC-101 monotherapy. Disclosures Shiratsuchi: Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co.Ltd: Research Funding; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co.Ltd: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo Co.Ltd: Research Funding. Fukuda:Chugai Pharmaceutical: Speakers Bureau. Ishida:Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co.Ltd: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene K.K: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer AG: Research Funding; Mundiparma K: Honoraria. Akashi:Ono Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Taiho Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; sanofi: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Eli Lilly Japan: Research Funding; Novartis pharma: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Otsuka Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Asahi-kasei: Research Funding; Chugai Pharma: Research Funding. Matsuoka:Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Suehiro:Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Research Funding; Ono Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Chugai Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceutical: Research Funding.

Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is frequently curable after frontline therapy, however, relapses can occur after achievement of a PET-negative complete remission (CR). Early detection of relapse may be associated with improved outcomes with second-line curative intent therapy or novel therapies. Controversy exists regarding the utility of post-therapy surveillance imaging which is associated with patient (pt) anxiety, radiation exposure, false-positive results, and cost. A retrospective study found that serial minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring during DLBCL surveillance could identify pts at risk of relapse before clinical evidence of disease (Roschewski, Lancet Oncol, 2015). In this multicenter prospective study, we assessed whether a next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based MRD assay could be used for early detection of molecular relapse in DLBCL. Methods: Eligible pts with DLBCL or high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBCL) who received anthracycline-containing chemotherapy were enrolled across five cancer centers. In pts who achieved a PET-negative CR, serial peripheral blood samples were obtained every 3 months (mos) and CT scans every 6 mos for 2 years (yrs) post-treatment. The clonoSEQ® next generation sequencing (NGS) MRD assay (Adaptive Biotechnologies, Seattle, WA) that leverages multiplex PCR followed by NGS to identify and track rearrangements of IgH, V-J, D-J and IgK/L loci and translocations in Bcl1/2-IgH was used. MRD positive was defined as any detectable rearrangement and MRD negative as no evidence of rearrangement. We also reported MRD positivity above the limit of detection (LOD) (observations required to have 95% reproducibility). Interim futility analysis was performed after approximately 50% of anticipated relapses occurred to assess the preliminary sensitivity of the assay. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as time from treatment start date to relapse or death. Results: 501 pts were enrolled and 401 were evaluable (pre-treatment tumor pathology available, completed frontline treatment, and achieved PET-negative CR at end-of-treatment). Baseline characteristics were median age of 62 yrs (range 19-95), male sex 58%, advanced stage 61%, and poor-risk by R-IPI 40% (Table 1). Histologies included DLBCL, NOS (86%), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (6%), HGBCL (5%), T-cell rich B-cell lymphoma (1%), and other (1%). Pts received regimens including RCHOP x 6 cycles (36%), REPOCH x 6 cycles (20%), clinical trial (15%), combined modality therapy (RCHOP+RT) (10%), and other RCHOP variations (19%). Among the 401 evaluable pts, 44 relapses have occurred as of June 1, 2020. In 47% of pts (18/38), clinical relapse was detected using surveillance imaging alone (typically CT CAP with IV contrast) in an otherwise asymptomatic pt with a normal physical exam and laboratory evaluation. Clinical relapse was detected by clinical symptoms alone in 11% (4/28), by the evaluation of an oncologist alone in 0%, and by imaging and clinical symptoms and/or evaluation by an oncologist in 42% (16/38) (missing data in 6 pts). With a median follow-up of 2.2 yrs, the 2-yr PFS was 88.1% (84.8, 91.4) (Figure 1). Advanced age, advanced stage, and poor-risk R-IPI were associated with inferior PFS. Of the 44 relapses, 43 pts were included in the interim analysis and tumor-specific clonotypes were identified in 39 pts (91%). In 56% (22/39), the MRD assay was positive at or before clinical relapse. In 38% (15/39), the MRD assay was positive above the limit of detection at or prior to clinical relapse, with only 10 relapses detected more than 3 mos prior to relapse, reflecting the poor clinical sensitivity of the assay. The NGS-MRD assay was more sensitive in the acellular (plasma cell-free DNA) than in the cellular (circulating leukocytes) compartment. Results: Overall outcomes are excellent for DLBCL and HGBCL pts who achieve PET-negative complete remission. In interim analysis, surveillance MRD assessment using the clonoSEQ® assay fails to consistently identify pts at risk of recurrence before clinical evidence of relapse in DLBCL. In a prospective analysis, a substantial proportion (47%) of clinical relapses are detected by imaging in asymptomatic pts, supporting the value of CT surveillance imaging in DLBCL, particularly for pts with advanced stage or high-risk disease. Additional analyses are forthcoming for MRD assessment in all pts, including those in remission. Disclosures Kumar: Celgene: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies,: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Honoraria for Advisory Board; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria, Other: Honoraria for Advisory Board; Kite Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Other: Honoraria for Advisory Board. Westin:Kite: Consultancy, Research Funding; Curis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Morphosys: Consultancy, Research Funding; 47: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding. Nowakowski:Curis: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Nanostrings: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy; Denovo: Consultancy; Kymera: Consultancy; Ryvu: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other. Lossos:Verastem: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Other; NCI: Research Funding; Stanford University: Patents & Royalties; Janssen Biotech: Honoraria; Janssen Scientific: Consultancy, Other. Batlevi:Life Sci, GLG, Juno/Celgene, Seattle Genetics, Kite: Consultancy; Janssen, Novartis, Epizyme, Xynomics, Bayer, Autolus, Roche/Genentech: Research Funding. Drullinsky:Roche: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Gerecitano:Janssen: Current Employment. Hamlin:Celgene: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy; Portola: Research Funding; Molecular Templates: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; J&J Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Portola Pharmaceutics: Consultancy. Horwitz:ASTEX: Consultancy; Affirmed: Consultancy; Vividion Therapeutics: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Myeloid Therapeutics: Consultancy; Miragen: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; C4 Therapeutics: Consultancy; Beigene: Consultancy; Portola: Consultancy, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Corvus: Consultancy; Trillium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millenium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakka Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity/Verastem: Research Funding; Forty Seven: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Aileron: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADCT Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Jacob:Adaptive Biotechnologies: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Joffe:AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Epizyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. von Keudell:Bayer: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Lahoud:MorphoSys: Other: Advisory Board. Matasar:Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Rocket Medical: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Consultancy; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; IGM Biosciences: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Immunovaccine Technologies: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Mullins:Adaptive Biotechnologies: Current Employment, Other: shareholder. Noy:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; NIH: Research Funding; Rafael Pharma: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Medscape: Consultancy; Targeted Oncology: Consultancy; Morphosys: Consultancy. Straus:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ASH: Other: Conference in December 2019 on HL to other physicians during ASH; Elsevier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: CME writer; OncLive: Speakers Bureau; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; NY Lymphoma Rounds: Consultancy; Targeted Oncology: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Imedex, Inc.: Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Younes:Takeda: Consultancy; HCM: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Current Employment; Novartis: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Epizyme: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; BioPath: Consultancy; Curis: Consultancy. Zelenetz:MEI Pharma: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Sandoz: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Adaptive Biotechnology: Consultancy; BeiGene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Background T-cell/histiocyte-rich large B-cell lymphoma (THRLBCL) is an uncommon variant of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), characterized by low content of lymphoma cells in a background of extensive infiltrate of T-cells and histiocytes. Historically, THRLBCL was considered an aggressive variant of DLBCL with poorer outcomes and a 3-year OS &lt;50% (Achten et al., J Clin Oncol, 2002). To date, most series evaluating outcomes for patients (pts) with THRLBCL were published in the pre-rituximab era. Recent analysis suggested that outcomes for this disease may be better for pts treated in the rituximab era (Ollila et el., Leukemia & Lymphoma, 2009). However, data regarding treatment patterns and outcomes for pts with THRLBCL in the rituximab era is limited. We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics, prognostic factors, response to treatment, and outcome among pts diagnosed with THRLBCL at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) in the rituximab era. Patients and Methods We retrospectively reviewed all cases of THRLBCL who were diagnosed in our center from January 2000 to October 2019. We collected data for demographic and clinical characteristics, pathology results, disease stage and sites of involvement, treatment regimen, and outcome. Fisher's exact test was used to assess associations between patient characteristics and treatment regimen. Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon test were used to assess associations between categorical or continuous characteristics and response to treatment, respectively. The likelihood ratio test was used to assess significance of Cox regression univariate models. Overall survival (OS) was measured from date of diagnosis until last follow up or death. Event-free survival (EFS) was measured from end of treatment to last follow up or pathology proven relapse or disease progression. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. Results A total of 100 pts were diagnosed with THRLBCL at our center during the study period. We excluded 33 pts who had missing data regarding stage, frontline treatment, or response. A total of 67 pts were included for analysis in our cohort. Median follow up duration among survivors was 3.4 years (range 0.4-10.8 years). Baseline characteristics are summarized in table 1. Forty-eight were males (72%). Median age at diagnosis was 41 years (range 19-86). Fifty-three (72%) pts were diagnosed at stage IV. Thirty-five (52%) pts had involvement of more than 1 extra-nodal site. The most common extranodal site was bone (60%). Fourteen pts had a positive bone marrow biopsy (26% of those evaluated). Univariate analysis was performed for age, gender, ethnicity, stage, extra-nodal sites, presence of B symptoms, performance status, elevated LDH, IPI score&gt;=3, and history of NLPHL. None of these factors were found significantly associated with response rate, EFS, or OS. Frontline treatment is shown in table 2 and included R-CHOP or R-CHOP based treatment in 48% (n=32), R-EPOCH in 12% (n=8), R-CHOP/R-ICE (4 cycles of R-CHOP-14 followed by 3 cycles of R-ICE, Moskowitz CH, et al. JCO 2010) in 33% (n=22) and other regimens in 7.5% (n=5). CNS prophylactic treatment was given in 19 pts. One pt had an autologous stem cell transplant and 1 pt had an allogeneic stem cell transplant as part of frontline treatment. Fifty-one (76%) pts had a complete response (CR) to frontline treatment. Among these pts, 6 relapsed. Sixteen (24%) pts had refractory disease. Among pts with relapsed or refractory disease, 18 received additional therapy. In the whole cohort, 3-year EFS was 68% and 3-year OS was 85%. In a sub-group analysis of pts who received R-CHOP/R-ICE compared to pts who were treated with R-CHOP or R-EPOCH, CR rates were 95% and 70% respectively (p=0.014). The R-CHOP/R-ICE regimen was also associated with higher 3-year EFS of 86% compared to 62% (p=0.049) and a better 3-year OS of 100% compared with 79% (p=0.016). See figures 1-2. The 2 treatment groups were not significantly different with regards to baseline characteristics. Conclusions Our study demonstrates better outcomes among pts with THRLBCL compared to available historical data from the pre-rituximab era. In addition, with the limitation of a retrospective, single-center study, our data suggests that for newly diagnosed THRLBCL, treatment with a higher intensity regimen, such as R-CHOP/R-ICE, may be associated with favorable outcome. Disclosures Batlevi: Life Sci, GLG, Juno/Celgene, Seattle Genetics, Kite: Consultancy; Janssen, Novartis, Epizyme, Xynomics, Bayer, Autolus, Roche/Genentech: Research Funding. Falchi:Roche: Research Funding; Genmab: Research Funding. Hamlin:Molecular Templates: Research Funding; Portola Pharmaceutics: Consultancy; J&J Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Portola: Research Funding. Horwitz:Forty Seven: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADCT Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; ASTEX: Consultancy; Beigene: Consultancy; Portola: Consultancy, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Corvus: Consultancy; Trillium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millenium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Infinity/Verastem: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakka Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Aileron: Consultancy, Research Funding; Vividion Therapeutics: Consultancy; Affirmed: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Miragen: Consultancy; Myeloid Therapeutics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; C4 Therapeutics: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding. Joffe:AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Epizyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kumar:AbbVie: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria, Other: Honoraria for Advisory Board; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Honoraria for Advisory Board; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies,: Research Funding; Kite Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Other: Honoraria for Advisory Board. Matasar:Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Immunovaccine Technologies: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; IGM Biosciences: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Rocket Medical: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Consultancy; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Noy:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Medscape: Consultancy; NIH: Research Funding; Rafael Pharma: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Morphosys: Consultancy; Targeted Oncology: Consultancy. Palomba:Genentech: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Juno: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria. Straus:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Targeted Oncology: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; NY Lymphoma Rounds: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; OncLive: Speakers Bureau; Elsevier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: CME writer; ASH: Other: Conference in December 2019 on HL to other physicians during ASH; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Imedex, Inc.: Speakers Bureau. Vardhana:Other: Other: SAV has received honoraria from Agios Pharmaceuticals and Rheos Pharmaceuticals, is an advisor for Immunai and has consulted for ADC Therapeutics. von Keudell:Bayer: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Zelenetz:Celgene: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy; Gilead: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnology: Consultancy; Sandoz: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; MEI Pharma: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; BeiGene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy. Moskowitz:Incyte: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Miragen Therapeutics: Consultancy; Imbrium Therapeutics, L.P.: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding.

Introduction Marginal Zone Lymphoma (MZL) includes three subtypes of indolent lymphoma: splenic MZL, extranodal MZL of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) and nodal MZL. The diagnosis of MZL is often made by exclusion of other lymphoma subtypes based on phenotype. One of the markers that are often involved in this discernment is CD5. The CD5 is not expressed in most of the cases of MZL, probably independently of the subtype, while it is usually expressed in different diseases such as Mantle Cell Lymphoma and Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma/Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. A subgroup of MZL, however, unequivocally expresses CD5, and very little is known about the characteristics and outcomes of these patients compared to their CD5 negative counterparts. Methods From our pathology database, we collected all the reports of indolent lymphoma containing the words "marginal zone" and/or "MALT" diagnosed or reviewed at MSKCC. We reviewed the text of the selected pathology reports to identify all cases that were unequivocally MZL and reported positivity or negativity of the CD5 marker in the lymphoma cells. From the electronic medical records, we collected all the relevant clinical information for all CD5+ MZL cases, and for a subset of CD5- MZL cases with a 1:2 match for age at diagnosis and sex. The survival and baseline characteristics analyses only included patients that were followed by our lymphoma group. We report differences between groups with the chi-squared test. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the cumulative incidence method, and time to treatment (TTT) was estimated using the subdistribution function to adjust for semi-competing risk of death on treatment initiation. A modified proportional hazards model was used to compare the subdistribution hazard between groups, and a standard Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare the hazard of death between groups. Results From 03/1998 to 09/2019, 64 patients were diagnosed with CD5+ MZL and followed by the Lymphoma Service at MSKCC. The control group of CD5- MZL included 137 patients that matched the CD5+ positive patients for age at diagnosis and sex. 20.3% of the CD5+ vs 14.6% of the CD5- MZL were nodal (p=0.30); Extra-nodal (EN) localizations included: GI tract - other than stomach (5.9% CD5+, 9.4% CD5-), stomach (17.7% CD5+, 17.1% CD5-), skin (7.8% CD5+, 12.0% CD5-), lung (9.8% CD5+, 12.0% CD5-), eye (9.8% CD5+, 7.7% CD5-), spleen (25.5% CD5+, 18% CD5-), multiple sites (13.7% CD5+, 10.3% CD5-), other single EN sites (9.8% CD5+, 13.7% CD5-). IPI score was low in 52% CD5+ vs 61% CD5-; low intermediate in 28% CD5+ vs 19% CD5-; high intermediate in 21% CD5+ vs 13% CD5-; no CD5+ had high IPI, while 7% of CD5- did (chi-square p=0.04). Transformation to DLBCL was similar in the 2 groups with 7% events in CD5+ and 4% in CD5- (p=0.42). Bone marrow involvement seemed to be more prevalent in the CD5+ MZL (67.5% vs 47.2% of the CD5-; p=0.04). IGHV was mutated in 80% of the CD5+ and 64% of the CD5- (p=0.24). OS analysis was performed first considering death by any cause: median OS was not reached for CD5+ MZL (95% C.I. 8.8 years - NE) and it was 27 years for CD5- (95% C.I. 14.3 years - NE). No difference was observed between CD5+ vs CD5- (p=0.9, Figure 1A). We also calculated MZL related survival, including deaths related to transformation to high grade lymphoma. No difference was observed between CD5+ vs CD5-, (p=0.3, Figure 1B). Median time to 1st treatment (including topical treatment and radiation therapy) was 1.4 years (95% C.I. 0.4 - 2.3) for CD5+ and 0.4 years (95% C.I. 0.3 - 0.9). No difference was observed between CD5+ vs CD5- (p=0.2, Figure 1C). Median time to first systemic treatment was 4.3 years (95% C.I. 1.6 - 12.9) for CD5+ and 7 years (95% C.I. 3.1 - 15.4) for CD5- MZL. No difference was observed between CD5+ vs CD5- (p=0.6, Figure 1D). Conclusions In this retrospective case-control analysis assessing the differences between CD5+ and CD5- MZL in terms of clinical presentation, survival, transformation occurrence and time to first topical or systemic treatment, we demonstrate that the two subgroups might have some differences in terms of bone marrow involvement but probably no difference in terms of outcome. Our sample size is small, and larger studies on a population with more events might clarify, with multivariate analysis, if these differences are real. Figure Disclosures Joffe: Epizyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Palomba:Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Regeneron: Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics, a Bristol-Meyers Squibb Company: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Noy:Rafael Pharma: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Medscape: Consultancy; Targeted Oncology: Consultancy; Morphosys: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; NIH: Research Funding. Matasar:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Immunovaccine Technologies: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; IGM Biosciences: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Research Funding; Rocket Medical: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Teva: Consultancy; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. Hamlin:J&J Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Portola Pharmaceutics: Consultancy; Portola: Research Funding; Molecular Templates: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy. Kumar:Kite Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Other: Honoraria for Advisory Board; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria, Other: Honoraria for Advisory Board; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Honoraria for Advisory Board; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies,: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Moskowitz:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Miragen Therapeutics: Consultancy; Imbrium Therapeutics, L.P.: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy. Falchi:Genmab: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding. von Keudell:Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria. Straus:Targeted Oncology: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ASH: Other: Conference in December 2019 on HL to other physicians during ASH; Elsevier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: CME writer; OncLive: Speakers Bureau; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; NY Lymphoma Rounds: Consultancy; Imedex, Inc.: Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Horwitz:Aileron: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADCT Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Forty Seven: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity/Verastem: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakka Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millenium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Trillium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Corvus: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Portola: Consultancy, Research Funding; Beigene: Consultancy; C4 Therapeutics: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Miragen: Consultancy; Myeloid Therapeutics: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Vividion Therapeutics: Consultancy; Affirmed: Consultancy; ASTEX: Consultancy. Dogan:Takeda: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Physicians Education Resource: Consultancy; Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; EUSA Pharma: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; National Cancer Institute: Research Funding. Zelenetz:BeiGene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnology: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy; Gilead: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Sandoz: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; MEI Pharma: Research Funding.

Introduction: The standard approach for relapsed or refractory (RR) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) following front-line treatment failure is second line therapy (SLT) aimed to achieve complete response (CR), followed by consolidation with high dose therapy and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HDT/AHCT). No one standard SLT exists and options include regimens containing platinum, gemcitabine, and more recently brentuximab vedotin (BV). Complete response rates associated with these regimens range from 50-70%. Due to the increasing use of BV in the front-line setting, development of SLT regimens that are both highly effective and BV-sparing are needed. Programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors are highly active in RR cHL and have the potential to enhance the efficacy of standard chemotherapy. Here we report the results of our phase II study evaluating a novel anti-PD-1-based regimen, pembrolizumab plus gemcitabine, vinorelbine, and liposomal doxorubicin (pembrolizumab-GVD), as SLT for RR cHL. Methods: Transplant eligible patients (pts) with RR cHL following failure of 1-line of therapy were eligible. Treatment consisted of 2 to 4 cycles of pembrolizumab (200mg IV, day 1), gemcitabine (1000mg/m2 IV, days 1 and 8), vinorelbine (20mg/m2 IV, days 1 and 8) and liposomal doxorubicin (15mg/m2, days 1 and 8), given on 21-day cycles. Pts who achieved CR by PET (Deauville ≤3) after 2 or 4 cycles proceeded to HDT/AHCT. HDT/AHCT was carried out according to institutional standards and BV maintenance was allowed following HDT/AHCT. The primary endpoint was CR rate after 2 or 4 cycles of pembrolizumab-GVD. Enrollment occurred according to a Simon 2-stage design with sample size based upon a projected CR rate of 70%. In stage 1, 23 pts enrolled and 12 or more CRs were required to proceed to stage II; in stage II, an additional 16 pts enrolled. Out of a total of 39 pts, 24 CRs were required to declare this regimen promising. Results: Among 39 patients enrolled, 37 are evaluable for toxicity (2 pts have not yet started treatment) and 34 are evaluable for response (4 pts too early, 1 pt found to have composite lymphoma after enrollment). Of 37 treated pts, median age is 36 (range 21-71), 43% are male, 23 (62%) had advanced stage disease, and 15 (41%) had primary refractory disease. With regard to RR cHL risk factors (B-symptoms, extranodal disease, and relapse/refractory disease within 1 year of initial treatment), 4(11%) had no risk factors (RFs), 21 (57%) had 1 RF, 9 (24%) had 2 RFs, and 3 (8%) had all 3 RFs. Treatment was well tolerated with most adverse events being grade 1 or 2 (see figure 1). Grade 3 AEs included rash (n=1), elevated AST/ALT (n=3), oral mucositis (n=2), and neutropenia (n=3). Figure 2 shows the outcome for all 37 treated pts. Among 34 evaluable pts, 31 (91%) achieved CR after 2 cycles and 3 achieved partial response. An additional 1 pt achieved CR after 4 cycles of pembrolizumab-GVD, therefore in total, 32 of 34 (94%) achieved CR following pembrolizumab-GVD. 4 pts with CR after 2 cycles received an additional 2 cycles of pembrolizumab-GVD in order to delay HDT/AHCT during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic (n=3) or due to refusing HDT/ASCT (n=1). To date, 32 have undergone HDT/AHCT following 2 (n=27) or 4 (n=5) cycles of treatment. 1 pt is awaiting HDT/AHCT; 1 pt refused HDT/ASCT and received pembrolizumab maintenance instead. 2 pts received involved site radiation therapy to initial area of relapsed disease prior to planned HDT/AHCT and 10 pts received post-HDT/ASCT maintenance with BV. Median follow-up post-HDT/AHCT is 9 mos (range 0.03-20.9 mos) and all pts remain in remission to date. Conclusion: Second-line therapy with pembrolizumab-GVD is a highly effective and well-tolerated regimen that can efficiently bridge pts with RR cHL to HDT/AHCT. Updated results including all 39 enrolled pts will be presented at the meeting. Given the high CR rate observed with pembrolizumab-GVD, an expansion cohort evaluating 8 cycles of pembrolizumab maintenance (instead of HDT/AHCT) for patients who achieve CR after 4 cycles of pembrolizumab-GVD is planned. Disclosures Moskowitz: Merck: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Miragen Therapeutics: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Imbrium Therapeutics, L.P.: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Shah:Amgen Inc.: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Kumar:AbbVie: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Honoraria for Advisory Board; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria, Other: Honoraria for Advisory Board; Celgene: Research Funding; Kite Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Other: Honoraria for Advisory Board; Adaptive Biotechnologies,: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Lahoud:MorphoSys: Other: Advisory Board. Batlevi:Life Sci, GLG, Juno/Celgene, Seattle Genetics, Kite: Consultancy; Janssen, Novartis, Epizyme, Xynomics, Bayer, Autolus, Roche/Genentech: Research Funding. Hamlin:J&J Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Portola: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Portola Pharmaceutics: Consultancy; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Molecular Templates: Research Funding. Straus:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Imedex, Inc.: Speakers Bureau; Targeted Oncology: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; NY Lymphoma Rounds: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; OncLive: Speakers Bureau; Elsevier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: CME writer; ASH: Other: Conference in December 2019 on HL to other physicians during ASH; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Horwitz:ASTEX: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Myeloid Therapeutics: Consultancy; Miragen: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; C4 Therapeutics: Consultancy; Affirmed: Consultancy; Vividion Therapeutics: Consultancy; Beigene: Consultancy; Portola: Consultancy, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Corvus: Consultancy; Trillium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millenium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakka Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity/Verastem: Research Funding; Forty Seven: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Aileron: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADCT Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Falchi:Genmab: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding. Joffe:Epizyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Noy:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Rafael Pharma: Research Funding; NIH: Research Funding; Morphosys: Consultancy; Medscape: Consultancy; Targeted Oncology: Consultancy. Matasar:Teva: Consultancy; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Research Funding; IGM Biosciences: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Immunovaccine Technologies: Honoraria, Research Funding; Rocket Medical: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Vardhana:Other: Other: SAV has received honoraria from Agios Pharmaceuticals and Rheos Pharmaceuticals, is an advisor for Immunai and has consulted for ADC Therapeutics. von Keudell:Genentech: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Zelenetz:Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Adaptive Biotechnology: Consultancy; BeiGene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Sandoz: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; MEI Pharma: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Pembrolizumab as second-line therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma

Abstract Background Following activation by recognition of foreign antigens, human T-cells alter their metabolic pathways to meet the increasing energetic demands for efficient immune response. Like cancer cells, alloreactive T-cells show a preference for aerobic glycolysis rather than oxidative phosphorylation, which is referred to as "Warburg effect". Until recently, it has been thought that extracellular fatty acid (FA) uptake and β-oxidation are severely reduced in alloreactive T-cells; however, some studies have indicated that lipid metabolism is rather increased in alloreactive mouse T-cells, and that metabolic pathway of FA can be a promising target for GVHD. To determine the role of lipid metabolism in human alloreactive T-cells after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, we investigated the metabolic changes in human T-cells in vivo using human-into-mouse xenogeneic GVHD models. Methods NOG mice received 250cGy of total body irradiation (TBI) and were subsequently injected intravenously with human pan T-cells. All mice developed severe GVHD and died within 2 weeks, while mice that received TBI only survived without any symptoms of GVHD. Cells were harvested from GVHD target organs of mice at day 9 after transplantation. For the measurement of glucose and fatty acid (FA) uptake by flow cytometry, cells were stained with fluorescent-labeled deoxyglucose analogue (2-NBDG) and long-chain fatty acid analogue (BODIPY 500/510 C12), respectively. PCR array and extracellular flux analysis were performed according to manufacturer's instructions. Results Glucose uptake, determined by flow cytometry, was significantly increased in human T-cells obtained from GVHD mice. Extracellular FA uptake was also increased in human T-cells in GVHD mice, and was associated with cell proliferation rate. Effector memory T-cells followed by central memory T-cells showed a higher FA uptake than did naive T-cells. These findings were similarly observed in both human CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells. Robust T-cell proliferation was observed even in MHC class I/II deficient (MHC−/−) NOG mice after transplantation, although to a lesser extent than MHC+/+ NOG mice, in a process known as homeostatic proliferation. Extracellular uptake of FA as well as glucose in T-cells was significantly decreased in MHC−/− NOG mice. Of note, even when compared among only fully proliferated T-cells between MHC+/+ and MHC−/− NOG mice, FA uptake was still significantly decreased in MHC−/− NOG mice, suggesting that the recognition of host MHC molecules by allogeneic T-cells accelerate this process. To compare the ability of human naive and memory T-cells to incorporate extracellular FA, we isolated human naive (CD45RA high) and memory (CD45RA low) T-cells and separately injected into NOG mice. Although it has been shown that memory T-cells exhibit different effector functions, the FA uptake in memory T-cells was comparable to that in naive T-cells. This suggests that memory T-cells can also alter their lipid metabolism following encounter with alloantigens. Finally, we assessed the expression of genes associated with lipid metabolism in human T-cells obtained from GVHD mice. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis detected up-regulation of mRNAs encoding the enzymes involved in FA transport including carnitine palmitoyltransferase (CPT1B), fatty acid binding protein (FABP1-4, FABP6, and FABP7), and β-oxidation pathway including acyl-CoA synthase (ACSBG2) and acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (ACAD9-11, ACADS, and ACADL) when compared with T-cells in MHC−/− NOG mice. Similarly, the expression of genes encoding the enzymes in triacylglycerol metabolism such as glycerol kinase (GK, GK2) and lipoprotein lipase (LPL) was up-regulated in GVHD mice. Furthermore, the expression of genes associated with mevalonate pathways such as HMG-CoA synthase (HMGCS1, HMGCS2), was also upregulated. These observations suggest that T-cells activated by alloantigens in vivo promote lipid hydrolysis, mitochondrial FA transport, and β-oxidation, resulting in greater utilization of free FA. Conclusion Human alloreactive T-cells increased extracellular uptake of FA as well as glucose, and intracellular lipid metabolism in response to alloantigens (summarized in the graphical abstract). Therapeutic effects of specific inhibition of lipid metabolic pathways by pharmacological inhibitors including etomoxir are now being investigated in this model. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Fujiwara: Shire: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Chugai: Consultancy; Kirin: Consultancy; Kyowa-Hakko: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy. Ohmine:Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Speakers Bureau; Takara Bio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda Pharmaceutical: Speakers Bureau; Celgene Corporation: Speakers Bureau; Chugai Pharmaceutical: Speakers Bureau; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau; Ono Pharmaceutical: Consultancy. Muroi:Japanese Red Cross Society: Speakers Bureau; Dickinson and Company: Speakers Bureau; Becton: Speakers Bureau; JCR: Speakers Bureau. Kanda:Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Eisai: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Taiho: Research Funding; Nippon-Shinyaku: Research Funding; Chugai: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Dainippon-Sumitomo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Otsuka: Research Funding; Shionogi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kyowa-Hakko Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Asahi-Kasei: Research Funding; Ono: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Taisho-Toyama: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Tanabe-Mitsubishi: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Mochida: Consultancy, Honoraria; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takara-bio: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Abstract Germline mutations of DEAD-box helicase 41 (DDX41) have recently been implicated in adult-onset myeloid neoplasms, including myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, with their prevalence being largely based on the studies from Caucasian populations, the prevalence of DDX41 pathogenic variants in other ethnicities and their risks for myeloid neoplasms have not been fully investigated. Moreover, the clinicopathological features of DDX41-mutated myeloid neoplasms and their genetic profiles have not been elucidated either. To address these issues, we investigated germline DDX41 variants among a large cohort of Japanese patients (n=1,609) with sporadic myeloid neoplasms including MDS (n=1,102), myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (n=14), myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) (n=31), secondary AML derived from these myeloid neoplasms (sAML) (n=47), and de novo AML (n=410), as well as Japanese healthy controls (n=17,186) using targeted deep sequencing, whole exome sequencing, and/or whole genome sequencing, though which pathogenic germline DDX41 variants and their clinical, pathological, and genetic features were investigated. Risk of detected germline variant for myeloid neoplasms was evaluated by comparing their frequencies between patients and healthy individuals. The germline origin of candidate risk alleles was confirmed using buccal mucosa samples. We identified 4 germline variants that were significantly enriched in the patient cohort (n=58, 3.6 %) compared to healthy controls (n=42, 0.2%) (OR=15; 95%CI: 10.2-22.8), including two truncating variants, p.A500fs (OR=14; 95%CI: 8.7-24.4), p.E7X (OR=12.6; 95%CI: 2.1-86), and two missense alleles, p.Y259C (OR=15; 95%CI: 4.1-60), and p.S363del (OR=11; 95%CI: 3.4-35). Four additional truncating and splice-site variants, Y279X (n=1), R124fs (n=1), c.571+2T>G (n=2), and c.298+1G>T (n=1), were also considered as risk alleles, although a small number of each variant precluded an accurate estimation of enrichment in the patient cohort. Overall, as many as 63 (3.9%) patients harbored one of these variants, where each variant allele was invariably heterozygous. Of note, none of these 8 risk variants have been reported in the Caucasian population. To further evaluate the pathogenic role of these DDX41 germline variants, clinical features and somatic genetic events were investigated. The median age at diagnosis did not significantly differ between patients with and without DDX41 variants (60 and 56 years old in variant carrier and in non-carrier, respectively), suggesting that DDX41-mediated myeloid leukemogenesis shows an age-dependence similar to that in other sporadic cases. Compared with DDX41-unmutated cases, DDX41-mutated cases showed a higher male predominance (52/11 and 987/559, respectively; OR=2.7; 95%CI: 1.4-5.1) and were more likely to have an initial diagnosis of MDS rather than de novo AML (55/8 and 1,094/402, respectively; OR=2.5; 95%CI: 1.2-5.4). Patients with germline DDX41 mutations had a median of 1 (0-5) somatic mutations. Somatic DDX41 mutations were found in 43 (2.6%) cases, a majority of which harbored a germline DDX41 risk variants (32/63 (52%) and 11/1,549 (0.7%), respectively; OR=143; 95%CI: 67-311). Other targets of somatic mutations in risk allele-positive cases included ASXL1 (n=9), DNMT3A (n=6), TP53 (n=5), and JAK2 (n=4), for which no significant correlation was observed between risk allele-positive and negative cases. Abnormal cytogenetics and copy number abnormalities were detected in 30 (48%) of the patients with DDX41 risk alleles, none of which were significantly in the risk allele-positive cases. In conclusion, we identified DDX41 germline risk variants among the Japanese population. Germline DDX41 variants were seen in a substantial fraction of Japanese patients with sporadic myeloid neoplasms. Found in the general Japanese population at very low frequencies, these risk alleles account for the largest germline risk for myeloid neoplasms. Somatic DDX41 mutations were common with a prominent mutational hotspot, almost exclusive found in patients with DDX41 risk alleles. Given the high prevalence of DDX41 germline variants and the late onset of associated MDS and sAML, their detection may help better manage patients and carriers who carried DDX41 risk alleles, even when no family history is known. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Ishiyama: Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria. Chiba:Bristol Myers Squibb, Astellas Pharma, Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Research Funding. Asou:Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma Inc.: Research Funding; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Asahi Kasei Pharma Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Eisai Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; SRL Inc.: Consultancy; Yakult Honsha Co., Ltd.: Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Speakers Bureau. Naoe:Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Toyama Chemical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Pfizer Japan Inc.: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma Inc.: Research Funding; Fujifilm Corporation: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Usuki:Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline K.K.: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma Inc.: Research Funding; Sanofi K.K.: Research Funding; Shire Japan: Research Funding; SymBio Pharmaceuticals Limited.: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Boehringer-Ingelheim Japan: Research Funding; Pfizer Japan: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K: Research Funding; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Ono Pharmaceutical: Speakers Bureau; Takeda Pharmaceutical: Speakers Bureau; Chugai Pharmaceutical: Speakers Bureau; Nippon Shinyaku: Speakers Bureau; Mochida Pharmaceutical: Speakers Bureau; MSD K.K.: Speakers Bureau. Miyawaki:Novartis Pharma KK: Consultancy; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Consultancy; Astellas Pharma Inc.: Consultancy.