To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Highly cited authors.
Journal articles on the topic 'Highly cited authors'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Highly cited authors.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
Small, Henry. "Why authors think their papers are highly cited." Scientometrics 60, no. 3 (2004): 305–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/b:scie.0000034376.55800.18.
Full text
2
Subbiah, Arunachalam. "Highly cited papers from India and China." Current Science 99, no. 6 (2010): 738–49. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10784713.
Full textAbstract:
Research papers published by Chinese and Indian researchers during 1998-2007 and cited at least 100 times by end of 2009 are analysed. There were 776 papers with at least one author from India (amounting to 0.32% of all papers from India) and 2260 papers with at least one author from China (0.4% of all papers from China) that have gone on to be cited at least 100 times. We have identified prominent authors and institutions, journals used and fields of research. Although highly cited Chinese papers were cited on average less often than the highly cited papers from India, Chinese authors have been able to place their papers in high impact journals such as Nature and Science far more often than Indian authors. The Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Tata Insti- tute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai and Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Bangalore are the prominent Indian institutions, whereas universities in Hong Kong, Peking University, Tshing Hua University and several institutions under the Chinese Academy of Science dominate in China. In terms of citations, Chinese National Human Genome Centre Shanghai, Shanghai, tops the list.
3
Ram, Shri, and Faizul Nisha. "Highly Cited Articles in Coronavirus Research." DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology 40, no. 04 (2020): 218–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.14429/djlit.40.04.15671.
Full textAbstract:
In this paper, an analysis of 806 highly cited articles was carried out based on the data retrieved from SCOPUS multidisciplinary database on ‘Coronavirus’ research published during 1970-2019 and 2020. The term ‘Coronavirus’ was used to retrieve data from the fields - title, abstract & keyword. Further, an analysis was carried out for the citation life cycle of the highly cited articles, performance of authors, institutions, country, and journals. During the period a total of 18,116 articles published up to 2019; and 1221 articles published in 2020 till 30 March 2020. The articles with more than 100 citations were taken as highly cited articles in coronavirus research. On this basis, there were 806 articles with more than 100 citations and considered for the data analysis. The highly cited articles were mostly published from the USA. The ‘Journal of Virology’ was most productive journal publishing most of the highly cited articles. These highly cited articles were published between 1973 to 2016. The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong was the most productive institute, published most number of highly cited articles. Kwok Yung Yuen from the University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen was the most productive author, who has published most number of highly cited articles. The seven articles had shown ‘sleeping beauty’ characteristics in citation trends.
4
Hsu, Y. H. E., and Y. S. Ho. "Highly Cited Articles in Health Care Sciences and Services Field in Science Citation Index Expanded." Methods of Information in Medicine 53, no. 06 (2014): 446–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.3414/me14-01-0022.
Full textAbstract:
SummaryObjective: This study aimed to identify and analyze characteristics of highly cited articles published in the Web of Science category of health care sciences and services from 1958 to 2012.Methods: Articles that have been cited at least 100 times were assessed regarding publication outputs, distribution of outputs in journals, publications of authors, institutions, countries as well as citation life cycles of the articles with the highest total citations since its publication up to 2012 and the highest citations in 2012. Six bibliometric indicators were used to evaluate source countries, institutions, and authors. Total citations from the time the articles were first published to the end of 2012 and citations in 2012 only were applied. Additionally, Y-index was applied to evaluate publication characteristics of authors. A high percentage of authors had the same numbers of first author and corresponding author status of highly cited articles in health care sciences and services field.Results: Results showed that 890 of the most highly referenced articles, published between 1977 and 2009, had been cited at least 100 times. Medical Care and Journal of General Internal Medicine published the most highly cited articles. The United States produced 76% of highly cited articles and also published the most number of independent, internationally collaborative, first authored, corresponding authored, and single author highly cited articles. The Harvard University was the most productive institute and was number one for the total highly cited articles, inter-institutionally collaborative articles, single institution articles, first author articles, and corresponding author articles.Conclusions: The application of quantitative techniques in the analysis of highly cited articles can improve the researchers’ understanding of the directions in health care sciences and services field. Y-index is useful for the evaluation of contributing authors.
5
Ho, Yuh-Shan. "Highly Cited Publications in WoS, Biomedical Engineering in Science Citation Index Expanded A Bibliometric Analysis." Biomedicine and Chemical Sciences 1, no. 1 (2022): 24–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.48112/bcs.v1i1.83.
Full textAbstract:
Identified and analyzed highly cited publications in the Web of Science category of biomedical engineering in the last three decades were investigated. Documents that have been cited more than 100 times from Web of Science Core Collection since publication year to the end of 2020 were defined as highly cited publications. The analyzed aspects covered document types, distribution of annual production and its citations per publication, journals, countries, institutes, authors, and the top cited articles. Publication performance of countries and institutions were evaluated by six publication indicators. Y-index was applied to evaluate authors’ publication potential and their publication characteristics. Citation indicators including total citation and citations in 2020 were used to compare the most frequently cited articles. Results shows that most highly cited papers were published in journals with high impact factors. The USA dominated the six publication indicators. The G7 were ranked in the top ten productive countries. Eight of the top ten productive institutes were all located in USA. Results from Y-index shows that highly cited authors had higher proportion of corresponding-author articles and first-author articles. The article by Kokubo and Takadama in 2006 was the most frequently cited and the article by Litjens et al. in 2017 was the most impactful in 2020.
6
Yuh-Shan, Ho. "Highly Cited Publications in WoS, Biomedical Engineering in Science Citation Index Expanded A Bibliometric Analysis." Biomedicine and Chemical Sciences 1, no. 1 (2022): 24–34. https://doi.org/10.48112/bcs.v1i1.83.
Full textAbstract:
Identified and analyzed highly cited publications in the Web of Science category of biomedical engineering in the last three decades were investigated. Documents that have been cited more than 100 times from Web of Science Core Collection since publication year to the end of 2020 were defined as highly cited publications. The analyzed aspects covered document types, distribution of annual production and its citations per publication, journals, countries, institutes, authors, and the top cited articles. Publication performance of countries and institutions were evaluated by six publication indicators. Y-index was applied to evaluate authors’ publication potential and their publication characteristics. Citation indicators including total citation and citations in 2020 were used to compare the most frequently cited articles. Results shows that most highly cited papers were published in journals with high impact factors. The USA dominated the six publication indicators. The G7 were ranked in the top ten productive countries. Eight of the top ten productive institutes were all located in USA. Results from Y-index shows that highly cited authors had higher proportion of corresponding-author articles and first-author articles. The article by Kokubo and Takadama in 2006 was the most frequently cited and the article by Litjens et al. in 2017 was the most impactful in 2020.
7
Ho, Yuh-Shan, and Leila Nemati-Anaraki. "Highly cited publication performance in the ophthalmology category in the Web of Science database: a bibliometric analysis." International Journal of Ophthalmology 16, no. 7 (2023): 1155–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2023.07.22.
Full textAbstract:
AIM: To determine and evaluate the features of highly cited articles (HCAs) in the ophthalmology category in the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) from 1991 to 2020. METHODS: The Web of Science Core Collection documents with at least 100 citations from their publication year until December 31, 2020, were evaluated as highly cited. The examined features were the distribution of yearly output and its average number of per publication, HCAs, authors, institutions, journals, and nations. The publication performance of nations and organizations was assessed using six publication indicators. The Y-index was employed to compare the research outputs of various authors. RESULTS: Publications that had cited the most references were highly published in high-impact factor journals. The United States of America came out on top across all six publication indicators, and it was home to eight of the top 10 most productive institutions. The articles written by Breivik et al (2006) and Farrar et al (2001) were highly cited and had a significant impact in 2020. The authors had a higher number of highly cited articles published as corresponding authors than as first authors. CONCLUSION: The findings of the present study highlight the current scope of global research in ophthalmology. The findings can help policy-makers and advisory groups of research centers to develop future policies. In addition, the findings can guide researchers in this field.
8
Mahapatra, Namita, and Jyotshna Sahoo. "Highly cited articles in social sciences: an analytical study." Library Hi Tech News 38, no. 10 (2021): 5–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/lhtn-01-2021-0001.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose This paper aims at analyzing the distinctive characteristics of highly cited articles (HCAs) in the domain of Social Sciences with respect to chronological growth pattern, productive journals, authorship pattern, prolific authors, top institutions and leading countries, network among institutions and top ranked keywords in social science research. Design/methodology/approach The required data has been retrieved from Scopus indexing database and further refined using various limits like document types, subject coverage and total citations, and finally, 839 articles were selected for detail analysis. A set of bibliometric indicators were used to make a quantitative analysis, whereas VOSviewer software tool was used to visualize the institutional network and keywords mapping of the HCAs. Findings This study revealed that highest number of HCAs (371) were published during the decade 2001–2010. Degree of collaboration, collaborative index and collaborative coefficient were observed to be 0.513, 1.98 and 0.988, respectively. The highly cited papers were emanated from 397 journals, contributed by 1,556 authors from 1,326 institutions placed in 46 countries. Social Science and Medicine was the most productive journal; J. Urry of Lancaster University, UK, was the most influential author; the USA, the UK and Canada are the torchbearers in social science research. The paper entitled “Five misunderstandings about case-study research,” authored by B. Flyvbjerg, published in 2006 in Qualitative Inquiry, received highest 4,730 citations. Originality/value The primary value of this paper lies in extending an understanding of the characteristics of HCAs in the domain of social sciences. It will provide an insight to the researchers to get acquainted with the most influential authors, journals, institutions, countries and major thrust areas of research in social sciences.
9
Kadam, Dr Santosh Dnyanobarao, and Shankar Chandrakant Bhusawar. "Webology: An Analysis of Citation Pattern." Webology 18, no. 2 (2021): 308–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.14704/web/v18i2/web18323.
Full textAbstract:
Efforts were made to analyze 5807 citations of Webology published during 2004 to 2019. The citations were classified on the basis of type of material which clearly indicates that periodicals and web resources were the most popular type of resources used by the authors for writing research papers. The study found that out of 5807 citations 2580 citations were authored by the single author and single authorship pattern was found as the most popular authorship pattern among the authors. The study founds the two oldest citations were from the books which were published before 1900. The findings of the study show the notable change in the use of type of resources being used for writing the research papers. The results of the study shoes that use the of periodicals and web resources for writing research papers was increased from 1951 and onward. The study also presented the list of the twenty five highly cited journals, ten highly cited authors, fifteen highly cited web links and five highly cited books.
10
Abramo, Giovanni, Tindaro Cicero, and Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo. "Are the authors of highly cited articles also the most productive ones?" Journal of Informetrics 8, no. 1 (2014): 89–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.10.011.
Full text
11
An, Juyoung, Namhee Kim, Min-Yen Kan, Muthu Kumar Chandrasekaran, and Min Song. "Exploring characteristics of highly cited authors according to citation location and content." Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 68, no. 8 (2017): 1975–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.23834.
Full text
12
Di Zeo-Sánchez, Daniel E., Pablo Sánchez-Núñez, Camilla Stephens, and M. Isabel Lucena. "Characterizing Highly Cited Papers in Mass Cytometry through H-Classics." Biology 10, no. 2 (2021): 104. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology10020104.
Full textAbstract:
Mass cytometry (CyTOF) is a relatively novel technique for the multiparametric analysis of single-cell features with an increasing central role in cell biology, immunology, pharmacology, and biomedicine. This technique mixes the fundamentals of flow cytometry with mass spectrometry and is mainly used for in-depth studies of the immune system and diseases with a significant immune load, such as cancer, autoimmune diseases, and viral diseases like HIV or the recently emerged COVID-19, produced by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus. The objective of this study was to provide a useful insight into the evolution of the mass cytometry research field, revealing the knowledge structure (conceptual and social) and authors, countries, sources, documents, and organizations that have made the most significant contribution to its development. We retrieved 937 articles from the Web of Science (2010–2019), analysed 71 Highly Cited Papers (HCP) through the H-Classics methodology and computed the data by using Bibliometrix R package. HCP sources corresponded to high-impact journals, such as Nature Biotechnology and Cell, and its production was concentrated in the US, and specifically Stanford University, affiliation of the most relevant authors in the field. HCPs analysis confirmed great interest in the study of the immune system and complex data processing in the mass cytometry research field.
13
Kolle, Shankar Reddy, M. S. Vijayashree, and T. H. Shankarappa. "Highly cited articles in malaria research: a bibliometric analysis." Collection Building 36, no. 2 (2017): 45–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/cb-10-2016-0028.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to reveal the bibliometric characteristics of highly cited articles in Malaria research for the period of 1991-2015. Design/methodology/approach The data of highly cited articles for the period of 1991 to 2015 were extracted from the Science Citation Index Expended of Web of Science. The keyword “Malaria” was used as topic term to search documents that contained this word in the title or keyword or abstract of the documents that published in 1991 to 2015. A total of 1,614 articles having TC2015 = 100 were retrieved as highly cited articles for further analysis, and Microsoft excel was used for the analysis purpose. Findings A total of 1,614 of highly cited articles were published in the 230 journals for the period of 1991 to 2015, and majority of the articles were appeared in journals that have top impact factor. The articles published in the 2011s have greater average citations and authors per article. Six journals have produced almost a quarter of highly cited articles and remaining articles were published in 224 journals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA was the most productive journal with 154 articles, which accounts for 9.53 per cent of the total articles, followed by Lancet (110; 6.81 per cent). We found degree collaboration value of 0.971 for the articles, which indicates the clear dominance of multiple authors in publication of highly cited articles in Malaria research. In this study, new indictor called P index was applied for the evaluation of the author’s productivity. As per the p-value, the White, NJ has emerged as the most productive author with the p-value of 0.41 (61 articles), followed by Marsh, K (p = 0.33), Nosten, F (p = 0.32) and Snow, RW (p = 0.31). The USA and the UK were the most productive countries. The article entitled as “Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of population health data” contributed by Lopez et al. (2006) was the most cited article with 2,245 citations in 2015. Research limitations/implications The data for the present study was limited to the publications that indexed in Science Citation index Expended of Web of Science. Originality/value This paper would be useful to the researchers to know the trends and achievements in the Malaria research and also to the library and information science professionals in collection building process.
14
Yaroshenko, Tetiana, and Oleksandra Yaroshenko. "Highly Cited Documents of Ukrainian Scholars in Citation Databases: Correlation of Bibliometric Indicators." Ukrainian Journal on Library and Information Science, no. 5 (June 19, 2020): 108–26. https://doi.org/10.31866/2616-7654.5.2020.205734.
Full textAbstract:
The purpose of this work is to review the potential use of scientometric and bibliometric indicators to assess the results of scientific activities and outline current trends and correlations of data and indicators of highly cited documents of Ukrainian authors in leading citation databases. Based on the analysis of selected documents and citations of Ukrainian researchers in three citation databases Dimensions, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, as well as taking into account some indicators of Altmetrics and using indicators such as Scopus Citation benchmarking, Plum X Metrics for time period of 2017–2019, this paper highlights the features, trends and correlations of individual indicators for highly cited publications of Ukrainian researchers. There are a number of examples illustrating the study. It was found that the first ten highly cited documents of Ukrainian authors are the work of a large number of co-authors, in particular foreign ones, at the same time there are documents where scientists with Ukrainian affiliation are the main authors; top-list journals are not Ukrainian sources; most Ukrainian-affiliated documents obtained from searches in leading citation databases are published in journals with open access publication model, although the absence of full text and mention of the document on the Internet does not mean the absence of citations, if it is of interest to the scientific community; documents from Ukrainian authorsreceived the most citations in the following fields of knowledge: medical, physical, mathematical, computer and chemical sciences. The authors of this study confirm, in particular, the obtained data correlate between the number of citations and the international academic partnership, access type and type of publication, source and place of publication, etc.
15
Fitria, Laili. "A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF RESEARCH ON BIOCHAR FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT." Jurnal Sosioteknologi 20, no. 1 (2021): 29–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.5614/sostek.itbj.2021.20.1.3.
Full textAbstract:
ABSTRACT This paper investigates global research of highly cited articles on biochar for wastewater treatment using bibliometricanalysis from Scopus database. Based on bibliometric, highly cited articles were published between 2009-2018. We found33 highly cited articles with 6,429 citations from various journals, countries, institutions, and authors. The most activejournal to publish biochar in wastewater treatment is Journal of Hazardous Materials (JHM) from Netherlands. Mostactive authors come from America and China. University of Florida, USA, is the most active institution to research theuse of biochar in wastewater treatment. Then, the common keywords that authors used are biochar and heavy metals. Itshows that biochar is effective to remove heavy metals from wastewater. Also, biochar optimization in production andadsorption is a concern of future research. This is one of the first attempts to understand a stream of research which, overtime, has paved the way for the utilization of biochar as a material for wastewater treatment.
16
Huang, Qiqi. "Intercultural Communicative Competence in Language Education: A Bibliometric Analysis (1995–2022)." International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics 9, no. 5 (2023): 361–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.18178/ijlll.2023.9.5.432.
Full textAbstract:
This study conducted a bibliometric analysis for intercultural communicative competence in language education by using 401 research articles in this field spanning from 1995 to 2022 in Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection—SSCI database. CiteSpace visualized knowledge maps of this field of research. The research findings show that in the field of Intercultural Communicative Competence (ICC) in language education, The Modern Language Journal is found to be the most highly cited journal within the past twenty-seven years; the top three highly cited authors are Michael Byram, Claire Kramsch, and Robert O’Dowd; Ethical Issues in Teaching for Intercultural Citizenship in World/Foreign Language Education is the most highly cited article; transcultural skill, intercultural communicative competence, technology-assisted L2 research, and pragmatics instruction are found to be top four leading research streams. These findings provide considerable insights into the highly cited journals, authors, articles and leading streams concerning ICC in language education from the diachronic perspective. The visualization of ICC in language education literature by formulating a bibliometric approach might be beneficial for researchers and scholars to track the development of this field.
17
Shi, Runfeng, Huilin Cao, Meixin He, et al. "Global vaccine research and application hotspots and trends: a systematic bibliometric analysis based on SCIE highly cited papers." BMJ Open 15, no. 1 (2025): e094935. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094935.
Full textAbstract:
ObjectivesCOVID-19, a public health emergency affecting the world in 2019, not only greatly promoted the development and application of vaccines but also effectively shortened the publishing time of scientific papers. In view of these facts, the current situation, status, problems and development trends of vaccine research and application were explored through bibliometric analysis of highly cited papers in the vaccine field within the time frame of 2014–2024, and the countries, institutions, authors, funding agencies and other relevant information that contributed most to vaccine research and application were summarised.DesignBibliometric analysis through data analysis and visual mapping.Data sourcesScientific articles.Data extraction and synthesis‘Vaccine’ and ‘vaccines’ were used in the WoS database to retrieve the publications and to adequately collect the data; Microsoft Excel was used for data analysis; and VOSviewer was used for visual description of data. Overall publication trends, countries, institutions and funding agencies, authors and articles, journals and languages, and research areas and co-occurrence keywords were analysed by bibliometrics.ResultsA total of 3258 highly cited papers were published in the field of vaccines in the past decade, from 735 different journals. With the COVID-19 pandemic in 2019, the number of highly cited papers in the field of vaccine research increased significantly from 2020 to 2024, accounting for 76.12%. The number of highly cited papers for vaccines peaked in 2021 and 2022, followed by a rapid decline. Highly cited papers came from 7133 institutions in 153 countries, and the most influential country in the field of vaccines was the USA, which published 1733 highly cited papers, accounting for 53.19% of the highly cited papers. The top 15 institutions with the largest influence were all from the USA or UK with 2567 published papers in total, accounting for 78.79% of highly cited papers. 4787 funding agencies were recognised in funding 2368 highly cited papers. A total of 30 926 authors in 90 research areas contributed significantly to global vaccine research. The most highly cited paper was ‘Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine’ from theNew England Journal of Medicine, which was cited 9435 times in total. Among the 9848 co-occurrence keywords, COVID-19 (including SARS-CoV-2, 2019-COVID and SARS2) was the most frequently co-occurrence keyword. It appeared in 1720 articles, accounting for 52.79%, indicating that COVID-19 was the most popular study in the last decade.ConclusionsThis study visualised the research and application of vaccines in the world from the perspective of papers output, drew the knowledge map and identified the important research hotspots and development trends in the vaccine field in the recent 10 years (2014–2024), which is helpful for Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, clinicians, researchers and health policymakers to better understand the research status and problems in vaccine research and application and predict its future development direction.
18
Bellomo, Tiffany R., Charles Hwang, Gloria Kim, Nick Osborne, James Stanley, and Matthew A. Corriere. "Industry Compensation To Physician Vascular Specialist Authors Of Highly Cited Aortic Aneurysm Manuscripts." Annals of Vascular Surgery 63 (February 2020): 2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2020.01.021.
Full text
19
Gadad, Raju, B. Ravi, and Kiran Savanur. "Highly Cited paper of Bharat Ratna Prof. CNR Rao: A Scientometric Attempt." Asian Journal of Information Science and Technology 9, no. 1 (2019): 91–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.51983/ajist-2019.9.1.2628.
Full textAbstract:
This attempt scrutinizes Prof. CNR Rao’s one of the highly cited papers, published in the year 2009, has received 767 citations during 2010-2017out of which citations, 25 were self-citations and rest 742 citations by others. Highest numbers (139) of citing papers were published by 4authors, in which 32 citing papers were published in the year 2015.The article has highly cited by authors published in the journals journal (688), and Reviews (70). Total number of 767 citing articles further received 35563 citations during 2010-2017.
20
Ren, Yuanyuan, Ruoqing Chen, Chunying Li, Jing Sun, Na Chen, and Sichang Peng. "Highly cited papers on biological products: A bibliometric study." Trends in Immunotherapy 8, no. 2 (2024): 8458. http://dx.doi.org/10.24294/ti8458.
Full textAbstract:
The clinical application of biological products is increasingly extensive, bringing good therapeutic effects for patients with a variety of immune diseases. We searched the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-E) database in the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) and selected the highly cited papers based on biological products. The literature was analyzed based on journals, countries/regions, institutions, authors, and keywords, using VOSviewer, SCImago Graphica, and CiteSpace software to generate knowledge maps and identify hotspots and trends. The 193 highly cited papers appeared in 124 journals from 59 different countries/regions. Nature Reviews Rheumatology published most of the articles, while Nature Reviews Drug Discovery had the highest number of citations. The United States had the highest number of publications, and the top institution and author was the University of California San Diego and Fabbrocini, Gabriella. The top 5 co-occurrence keywords included drug delivery, double blind, in vitro, monoclonal antibody, and in vivo. Biological products are important adjunctive therapies for the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Lowering the nanotoxicity of biological products, reducing adverse events due to immunogenicity, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) the efficacy of biological products, and producing new substances with intrinsic antimicrobial activity may be the focus and trends for future biological products research.
21
Nguyen, Van Luong, Dinh-Hai Luong, and Hiep-Hung Pham. " Publications on COVID-19 from Vietnam during 2020 and 2021: A bibliometric analysis." European Science Editing 48 (December 9, 2022): e83724. https://doi.org/10.3897/ese.2022.e83724.
Full textAbstract:
<strong>Background:</strong> Following the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, published research from Vietnam related to the pandemic was analysed using bibliometrics.<strong>Objectives:</strong> To examine the status of research on COVID-19 by authors from Vietnam.<strong>Methods:</strong> The following bibliometric aspects were considered in the analysis: international collaboration, institutions from Vietnam and their partner institutions worldwide, subjects and topics, types of documents, and individual authors. The basis of the study was data obtained from the Scopus database between 2020 and 2021. The data were analysed using Microsoft Excel, R, and VOSviewer, and the emerging trends illustrated through descriptive analysis and science mapping. <strong>Results:</strong> Between 2020 and 2021, researchers from Vietnam co-authored 1034 documents related to COVID-19, amounting to 0.35% of the total of 296,148 such documents published worldwide as ascertained from the Scopus database. Vietnam’s top country collaborators in that research were USA, Australia, the United Kingdom, India, and Taiwan ROC. The top Vietnam institutions were Duy Tan University, Ton Duc Thang University, and the University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City. The research from Vietnam covered many subjects, from medicine and natural sciences to social sciences and economics. Eight clusters of topics related to COVID-19 were identified. In terms of citations, the most highly cited documents were the outcome of collaboration with international authors. Lastly, the study ranked top authors based on either the number of publications or the number of citations. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> This study provides a preliminary picture of studies related to COVID-19 co-authored by researchers in Vietnam. The picture may help the Vietnam government in devising appropriate strategies for post-COVID-19 restoration of the country’s socio-economic status.
22
Ioannidis, John P. A., Angelo Maria Pezzullo, Antonio Cristiano, Stefania Boccia, and Jeroen Baas. "Linking citation and retraction data reveals the demographics of scientific retractions among highly cited authors." PLOS Biology 23, no. 1 (2025): e3002999. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002999.
Full textAbstract:
Retractions are becoming increasingly common but still account for a small minority of published papers. It would be useful to generate databases where the presence of retractions can be linked to impact metrics of each scientist. We have thus incorporated retraction data in an updated Scopus-based database of highly cited scientists (top 2% in each scientific subfield according to a composite citation indicator). Using data from the Retraction Watch database (RWDB), retraction records were linked to Scopus citation data. Of 55,237 items in RWDB as of August 15, 2024, we excluded non-retractions, retractions clearly not due to any author error, retractions where the paper had been republished, and items not linkable to Scopus records. Eventually, 39,468 eligible retractions were linked to Scopus. Among 217,097 top-cited scientists in career-long impact and 223,152 in single recent year (2023) impact, 7,083 (3.3%) and 8,747 (4.0%), respectively, had at least 1 retraction. Scientists with retracted publications had younger publication age, higher self-citation rates, and larger publication volume than those without any retracted publications. Retractions were more common in the life sciences and rare or nonexistent in several other disciplines. In several developing countries, very high proportions of top-cited scientists had retractions (highest in Senegal (66.7%), Ecuador (28.6%), and Pakistan (27.8%) in career-long citation impact lists). Variability in retraction rates across fields and countries suggests differences in research practices, scrutiny, and ease of retraction. Addition of retraction data enhances the granularity of top-cited scientists’ profiles, aiding in responsible research evaluation. However, caution is needed when interpreting retractions, as they do not always signify misconduct; further analysis on a case-by-case basis is essential. The database should hopefully provide a resource for meta-research and deeper insights into scientific practices.
23
Hajesmaeel-Gohari, Sadrieh, and Kambiz Bahaadinbeigy Bahaadinbeigy. "The 100 Most Highly Cited Articles Published in the Telemedicine Journals." Frontiers in Health Informatics 11, no. 1 (2022): 122. http://dx.doi.org/10.30699/fhi.v11i1.391.
Full textAbstract:
Introduction: Identifying highly cited articles helps researchers find the most important areas, effective authors in the field, pioneer countries and frequently used journals. This study aimed to review the 100 most highly cited articles published in telemedicine journals.Material and Methods: The list of the telemedicine journals was found by searching the “master journal list” of the Web of Science database. Then, the name of each journal was searched separately in the “Publication Name” section of the same database and the results were sorted based on the “times cited” order. The first 100 articles that received the most citations were selected. The journal name, study type and study field were extracted from the final articles.Results: The top 100 highly cited articles were published in the Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (n=54, 53.5%), Telemedicine and e-Health (n=45, 44.5%) and International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications (n=2, 2%). Most of the highly cited articles were review studies (n=55, 54%) and almost one-third of the reviewed articles were conducted on general telemedicine (n=28, 28%).Conclusion: This study revealed that some characteristics such as review studies, studies on general telemedicine, and studies being published in the oldest telemedicine journals were more likely used and cited.
24
Jacimovic, Jelena, Renata Petrovic, Tihana Divnic-Resnik, et al. "Highly cited papers in dental medicine based on essential science indicators." Srpski arhiv za celokupno lekarstvo, no. 00 (2021): 22. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/sarh210121022j.
Full textAbstract:
Introduction/Aim. Essential Science Indicators (ESI) Highly Cited Papers (HCPs) refer to the most influential scientific articles and breakthrough research within a research field in the past decade. This study aimed to identify the characteristics of ESI HCPs in the subject category Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Medicine, to recognize authors, institutions and countries of origin, and determine research trends that attracted the most scientific interest in dentistry. Methods. A descriptive analysis of bibliographic data, network extraction and visualization were completed. Furthermore, analyzed ESI HCPs were classified according to a field of interest, main research domain, type of study, and level of evidence. Results. The set of 185 dental HCPs was published in 42 journals from 2010 to 2020, with an average number of 211.7 citations per paper. Nearly half of HCPs were issued by the Journal of Dental Research, Dental Materials, and Journal of Clinical Periodontology. There were 765 authors affiliated with 351 institutions from 42 countries. The most productive institutions were the University of Hong Kong, the University of Michigan, and the University of Bern. The USA contributed with the highest number of publications, followed by China, and the United Kingdom. Dental Materials, Dental Implantology, Periodontology, and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery represented areas of significant interest within this subject category. The highest proportion of HCPs were narrative and systematic reviews, expert opinions, consensus reports, and in vitro /lab studies. Conclusion. Results obtained from this study can provide valuable information for researchers to better identify present and future hotspots in dental research.
25
Lei, Lei, Yaochen Deng, and Dilin Liu. "Research on the learning/teaching of L2 listening: A bibliometric review and its implications." Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 13, no. 4 (2023): 781–810. http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.40216.
Full textAbstract:
This bibliometric study examined the development of research on the learning and teaching of second language (L2) listening from 1948 to 2020 (73 years). Specifically, the study involved: (1) a search and analysis of all the noun phrases to identify important research topics in the abstracts of the published journal articles on L2 listening over the 73 years (divided into three periods) using self-made Python scripts and (2) three co-citation analyses of the references in these articles regarding highly cited authors, publications, and journals, respectively, via the VOSviewer program. The keyword/phrase analysis produced results that helped uncover and delineate the research trends in L2 listening across the three time periods. The co-citation analyses identified the most highly cited authors, publications, and journals as well as the interrelations among the most highly cited items in each of the three categories illustrated with network maps. The results of the analyses and their implications are discussed.
26
Hartley, James, and Yuh-Shan Ho. "Classic papers in psychology: From theory to practice." Psychology Teaching Review 21, no. 1 (2015): 73–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.53841/bpsptr.2015.21.1.73.
Full textAbstract:
Who are the most prestigious authors cited in today’s psychology textbooks and journals? And where are (or where were) they based? This short note reports on the answers gained to such questions by using the Web of Science Core Collection to find the authors of the most highly cited papers in psychology published between 1927 and 2012. The findings suggest that well–known historic figures of the past have now been replaced with tool makers.
27
Borah, Ranjan, and Margam Madhusudhan. "Altmetric Mapping of Highly-Cited Articles on Plagiarism in India." International Journal of Library and Information Services 12, no. 1 (2023): 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/ijlis.321659.
Full textAbstract:
The study aims to explore the online attention received by the top twenty highly cited publications on plagiarism published between 2011 to 2020 from India by using the observation method. The bibliographical data were collected from SCOPUS database and the altmetric data were collected by using the altmetric harvesting tools AltmetricIt and PlumX. The study's findings show that the citation count and the Altmetric Attention Score of the top twenty highly cited publications on plagiarism published between 2011 to 2020 from India are much lower than those from other countries. The Spearman correlation analysis of the citation count and AAS shows that they are not correlated. The study hopes that in the future, the publications to be published from India on important subjects such as plagiarism will have a more significant online impact on the research community and will help the authors and the publishers to understand the current status of the popularity of their research publications and the impact they have made on the research community.
28
Sikandar, Huma, Yamunah Vaicondam, Shazia Parveen, Nohman Khan, and Muhammad Imran Qureshi. "Bibliometric Analysis of Telemedicine and E-Health Literature." International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering (iJOE) 17, no. 12 (2021): 52–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v17i12.25483.
Full textAbstract:
Emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, the internet of things, cloud computing, and wearable gadgets have broadened the scope of telemedicine and eHealth in past years. This research aims to investigate the past patterns of telemedicine and eHealth research over the past ten years. Scopus database was used to extract the article information of the selected articles. The research is conducted on 1401 articles in which we investigated the top authors, journals, institutions, countries, and highly cited articles. Our research findings project the growth trend of publications and the pattern of authors and distribution of articles and the core journals. The top 10 authors in the selected field were identified so were the highly cited articles. Co-occurrence analyses of keywords, authors, and countries co-authors analysis and bibliographic coupling of VOS viewer documents were conducted. The limitations and directions for future researchers have also been discussed.
29
Peppas, Nicholas A., Ruth Duncan, Gary E. Wnek, et al. "Highly cited research articles in Journal of Controlled Release: Commentaries and perspectives by authors." Journal of Controlled Release 190 (September 2014): 29–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0168-3659(14)00482-9.
Full text
30
Bauer, Johann, Loet Leydesdorff, and Lutz Bornmann. "Highly cited papers in Library and Information Science (LIS): Authors, institutions, and network structures." Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 67, no. 12 (2015): 3095–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.23568.
Full text
31
Sangwal, Keshra. "Comparative study of scaling parameters and research output of selected highly- and moderately-cited individual authors." Journal of Computer Sciences Institute 23 (June 30, 2022): 152–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.2920.
Full textAbstract:
The real data of cumulative citations ln of selected nth paper of individual N papers published by some highly- and moderately-cited individual authors are analyzed to compare Hirsch and Hirsch-type indices h, h1, hf and hm, and citation radii R and Rf from consideration of: (1) the number An of coauthors of the paper, (2) the normalization of citations ln and cumulative fraction lnf of citation of the nth paper by mean and median citations of the citations ln of all Nc cited papers, and (3) the determination of effective rank neff of the lnf citations. Analysis of the ln(n), lnf(n) and lnf(neff) data was also carried out by using a Langmuir-type function l = l0[1-aKn/(1+Kn)], where l denotes the citations ln and lnf of all cited Nc papers arranged in the decreasing order, a is an effectiveness parameter, K is the so-called Langmuir constant, n denotes the rank n or neff of citations and l0 is the value of l when n or neff approaches zero. For a comparison of the publication output of different authors it was found that the hm index is more consistent than other indices, and it can be normalized to account for the publication career of different authors. However, Langmuir-type function is not adequate for comparison of the publication output of different authors because it describes the rank-order distribution patterns satisfactorily in terms of two parameters. To compare the publication output of different authors independent of their career length t, it is suggested to use scaling parameters h/t, hf/t and hm/t.
32
Goedderz, Cody J., Colin K. Cantrell, Stephen D. Bigach, et al. "Characteristics and Trends of Highly Cited Articles in Calcaneus Fracture Research." Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics 7, no. 1 (2022): 247301142210884. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/24730114221088490.
Full textAbstract:
Background: Despite significant effort expended toward exploring fracture patterns, surgical timing, surgical approaches, and possible implants within the calcaneus fracture literature, treatment is still fraught with complications and controversy. This study aims to conduct a citation analysis of the most cited articles related to calcaneus fractures to highlight the most historically influential articles, as well as the more recent breakthrough articles that are leading change within the field. Methods: A literature search was performed via Scopus on September 20, 2021 using the terms “(calcaneus OR calcaneal OR hindfoot) AND (fracture OR injury)” to search “article title, abstract, and keywords” of all primary and review articles. Search results were rigorously reviewed to ensure appropriateness for this study. The 50 highest total cited included articles were analyzed. Title, authors, journal, country of origin, institution, year of publication, citation variables (total citation count, total citation density, citation count from the last 5 years, and 5-year citation density), and level of evidence were collected for each article. One-way analysis of variance with post hoc testing was used to identify differences in citation variables and level of evidence. Pearson correlation was used to directly compare different citation variables. Results: The total citation count average was 178±33, with a total citation density average of 9±2. The year of publication for the 50 articles ranged from 1948 to 2014, with a median year of 1999. Roy W. Sanders was the most productive author in the field, authoring 6 articles and lead authoring 3. The most frequent level of evidence was IV with 19 articles. There was a strong correlation between total citation density and 5-year citation density. The article level of evidence showed no impact on the included measures of an article’s influence. Conclusion: This study successfully analyzes and presents the characteristics among the highest cited articles related to calcaneus fractures. The provided characterization of influential works and authors highlights trends, impactful findings, and future areas of focus within calcaneus fracture literature. Level of Evidence: Review Article.
33
Wu, Jia-Fen, and Xiaoxiao Lin. "Bibliometric analysis of publications on inclusive education from the Web of Science Core Collection published from 1992 to 2020." Science Editing 8, no. 1 (2021): 79–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.6087/kcse.233.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose: This study analyzed the bibliometric characteristics of publications on inclusive education in the Social Science Citation Index and Science Citation Index Expanded in the Web of Science Core Collection from 1992 to 2020.Methods: Terms related to “inclusive education” and “inclusion of education” were used as keywords to search for journal articles on July 3, 2020.Results: There were 1,786 articles, representing 3,376 authors, in the 345 journals scanned. The United States, United Kingdom, and Australia were the three leading countries/regions in this field. In the top 12 countries, the top 15 institutions and the top 10 most-cited journals were identified by either the number of publications or the number of total citations. Core themes from the 30 most highly-cited articles were teachers’ attitudes, teachers’ self-efficacy, and the effects of inclusive education. Teachers included both pre-service and in-service teachers; students represented those with and without special educational needs.Conclusion: The results indicate that the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia dominated inclusive education research, originating most of the highly-cited articles, having more prolific authors, and presenting the most-cited institutions. Furthermore, three emerging core themes from the 30 most highly-cited articles were teachers’ attitudes, teachers’ self-efficacy, and the effects of inclusive education. Frontline teachers are recommended to submit manuscripts about their teaching experiences to the most-cited journals, which have a large readership. To measure the effects of inclusive education, it is essential to formulate reliable, valid, and culture-free research instruments for future studies.
34
Han, Guosheng, Rundong Luo, Kaiyue Sa, Min Zhuang, and Hui Li. "Bibliometric Analysis of Highly Cited Papers on Resources and the Environment in China." Sustainability 14, no. 2 (2022): 604. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su14020604.
Full textAbstract:
To review the current state of resources and environmental sciences in China, this study assessed highly cited papers of five leading CSSCI journals sourced from the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure database. The fields of resources and environmental sciences were the research focus, and the bibliometric analysis software CiteSpace was used to perform co-occurrence analysis on keywords, authors, and research institutions based on bibliometrics and social network analysis. Furthermore, the research hotspots, scientist groups, and main cooperation models in the field of resources and environmental sciences in China were also explored. The results show that: (1) For 30 years, the interdisciplinarity of resources and environmental sciences has become more and more intense, and research themes have become increasingly extensive. The research hotspots of highly cited papers focused on energy, ecology, land, water resources, and sustainable development. In recent years, problems associated with energy and carbon emissions have aroused great interest. The ecological and sustainable development of resources and environmental elements has emerged as a future research trend. (2) An analysis of scientist-oriented networks shows that highly cited papers are mostly published by group authors. Scientists work closely within their respective academic groups, while intergroup academic cooperation is rare. Furthermore, connectedness between cooperation networks is poor, and scientists are largely connected through their research institutions. Cooperation among scientists is greatly affected by their geographical locations. Research institutions in the same region are more likely to cooperate. Beijing and Nanjing are high-producing areas of highly cited papers. The Institute of Geographic Sciences and Resources, CAS, is the most influential research institution. This paper introduces the state-of-the-art research hotspots of Chinese resources and environmental sciences to international academic circles and provides a basis for the research practice of resources and environmental sciences worldwide.
35
Selvi, G. Muthu, G. S. Mahalakshmi, and S. Sendhilkumar. "An Investigation on Collaboration Behavior of Highly Cited Authors in Journal of Informetrics (2007–2016)." Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience 14, no. 8 (2017): 3688–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1166/jctn.2017.6657.
Full text
36
Gutman, Sharon A., Ted Brown, and Yuh-Shan Ho. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Highly Cited and High Impact Occupational Therapy Publications by American Authors." Occupational Therapy In Health Care 31, no. 3 (2017): 167–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07380577.2017.1326192.
Full text
37
Levitt, Jonathan M., and Mike Thelwall. "The most highly cited Library and Information Science articles: Interdisciplinarity, first authors and citation patterns." Scientometrics 78, no. 1 (2008): 45–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1927-1.
Full text
38
B.N., Chigarev. "Identification of Promising Research Issues in the Digital Industry Topic by Analyzing Scopus Bibliometric Data for 2018 – 2022." Energy Systems Research 6, no. 2(22) (2023): 14–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.25729/esr.2023.02.0002.
Full textAbstract:
The paper aims to identify promising research issues on the topic of Digital Industry based on the analysis of bibliometric data from Scopus platform for 2018–2022. To this end, the titles and abstracts of highly cited works by authors with high publication activity were considered. Authors' Scopus profiles were used to determine their affiliations, which are important for an in-depth analysis of selected promising Digital Industry strands. Metadata filtering was performed to identify highly cited papers on particular issues by keyword, subject area, affiliation with countries and sponsoring organizations. Additionally, bibliometric metadata were clustered based on the co-occurrence of terms using VOSviewer. Within these clusters, articles of interest were identified for the formulation of promising research issues on the topic of Digital Industry, which will be thoroughly examined in separate papers.
39
Mohsen, Mohammed Ali. "A bibliometric study of the applied linguistics research output of Saudi institutions in the Web of Science for the decade 2011-2020." Electronic Library 39, no. 6 (2021): 865–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/el-06-2021-0121.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose This paper aims to analyse the research contributions of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in the field of applied linguistics (AL) indexed in the Web of Science core collection for the period between 2011 and 2020. Design/methodology/approach The author searched key terms in the Social Science Citation Index and Science Citation Index Expanded categories that publish documents in AL. The author compiled the data, classified these documents according to their research focus and investigated different metrics such as keywords analysis, citation analysis, overseas collaboration and productivity over authors, institutions and sources by using VOSviewer and Excel sheet. Findings Results found that publications in Saudi Arabia have tremendously increased around three times in the years 2016–2020 than before. As unexpected, highly cited researchers, sources and institutions for the social science and arts and humanities disciplines were higher than the scientific disciplines that investigated linguistic issues such as neurology, audiology and computer science. The area of language teaching and learning was the most researched area in which the highly cited author, journals and keywords analysis metrics occurred within its scope. The highly cited articles were those that collaborated with the world contributing authors and acted as corresponding authors. Originality/value The study contributes to the body of literature of AL which shares other categories that investigated language as a central issue. The study provides a fine-grained picture about the research productivity of AL in scientific and social science categories in Saudi Arabia.
40
Muhammad Abdul Mujeebu. "Editorial." International Journal of Advanced Thermofluid Research 7, no. 1 (2021): 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.51141/ijatr.v7i1.34.
Full textAbstract:
Research publications and their citation impact have been a topic of extensive studies in the recent past. In the current highly competitive environment, universities are struggling to maintain and enhance their research productivity and citations. This article presents the summary of a secondary analysis of the Elsevier-Stanford University list of the global 2% most-cited scientists released so far. The data regarding the career-long category were sorted according to the number of authors, affiliated university, and the country. Subsequently, the countries were ranked based on the total number of authors in each year from 2017 to 2020, and the top 100 countries were further analyzed to see their annual progress. The analysis shows that countries with clear, focused, and strategic approaches towards promoting collaborative research and open access to research data and publications could succeed in producing highly cited scientists.
41
Suryani, Ina, Aizan Yaacob, Ratnawati Mohd Asraf, Nadya Supian, Haniza MdHussin, and Mohammad Yousef Alsaraireh. "Techniques from Language Practices of Highly Cited Authors for Technical and Vocational Education and Training Research Writing." Arab World English Journal 15, no. 3 (2024): 202–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol15no3.12.
Full textAbstract:
Technical and Vocational Education and Training has gained importance but there is a noticeable gap between its research and teaching. While its teaching is more dynamic the research writing is scarce despite the performance measure demands. Rapid technological advancements, the multifaceted roles of the teachers, and the second language barrier escalate the pressure on research performance measures. Language models for research writing can help to alleviate research writing language practices. This paper explores the language practices of highly cited research articles for the technical and vocational education and training application. Specifically, it looks at how prolific writers write. Given the pressing need for a more accessible and more descriptive language model for technical and vocational research writing, this paper aims to assist by presenting techniques derived from the analysis of 62 highly cited research articles indexed in Scopus. Using move analysis, the study identifies 14 emerging techniques used in the introduction sections, offering a model for the writers and instructors. The techniques highlighted in this study not only enhance the engagement of introductions but also aim to increase readership and citation rates.
42
Arumugam, J., and R. Balasubramani. "Scholarly Output of Material Science Research in India: A Scientometric Analysis." Asian Journal of Information Science and Technology 9, no. 1 (2019): 95–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.51983/ajist-2019.9.1.2629.
Full textAbstract:
Material Science is a discipline which elevates the properties of matter and its applications to various areas of science and engineering. This science investigates the relationship between the structure of material and its properties. The researcher has made an attempt to highlight quantitatively and qualitatively the growth and development of scholarly publications by Indian Scientists and researchers on Materials Science during 2009-2018 as reflected in Scopus. This study describes and focuses the various factors such as chronology wise distribution; country wise distribution; ranking of highly cited authors; ranking of highly cited institutions; highly cited journals on Material Science; and predominant funding agencies. The results revealed that the highest number of (16.7%) papers published in 2018 and Journal of Materials Science Materials in Electronics is the predominantly used source for the scholarly publication in Material Science research in India. Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore has the highest number of publications in the Material Science research.
43
Jones, A. W. "Impact of JAT Publications 1981-2003: the Most Prolific Authors and the Most Highly Cited Articles." Journal of Analytical Toxicology 28, no. 7 (2004): 541–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jat/28.7.541.
Full text
44
Alqahtani, Hussam M., Ikram UI Haq, Mohammed Alrubayan, Faisal Alammari, Fahad Alotaibi, and Abdalrahman Al Khammash. "A Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 100 Cited Articles in Regenerative Periodontics Surgery: Insights and Trends." Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry 14, no. 3 (2024): 167–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_8_24.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract Aim: The aim of this study was to identify and appraise the bibliometric properties of top 100 most-cited articles on regenerative periodontics surgery (RPS). Materials and Methods: The bibliometric research technique was conducted using a dataset comprising the 100 highly cited articles obtained from Elsevier’s Scopus database on RPS. Information regarding the growth of articles by year, number of citations, citations per year, study design, study field, modalities, journals, authors, and countries were extracted for each article. Microsoft Excel (v.16) was utilized for data evaluation and tabulation. These articles on RPS were published over a span of 45 years, from 1975 to 2019, with citation metrics ranging from 144 to 820. Out of the 422 participating authors, 82% contributed to a single article. Results: The 100 most cited articles on RPS were published in 45 years from 1975 to 2019 and number of citations ranged from 144 to 820. Out of the 422 participating authors, 82% contributed in a single article.. The study design with the highest number of cited articles was laboratory/animal studies. Others/not specified was the preferred modality, followed by infrabony modality. The Journal of Periodontology published about one-fourth of the articles, with W. V. Giannobile emerging as the most productive author. Among the 100 most-cited articles on RPS, authors from 25 different countries contributed, with the United States producing half of the articles (n = 51). Bibliometric investigation revealed that the most cited papers published before 2000 had higher citation counts due to their longer period of exposure. The ratio of authors per article increased after the year 2000. Conclusions: Infrabony emerges as a trending topic in RPS, with laboratory/animal studies, clinical trials, and literature reviews being the most frequently employed study designs.
45
Han, Shi-Fan, Jin-Lian Cheng, Ya-Ping Wang, Qiong Chen, and Zhu-Ya Xu. "A bibliometric analysis of core articles of international nursing research frontiers based on the Web of Science database." Frontiers of Nursing 7, no. 1 (2020): 31–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/fon-2020-0010.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractObjectiveTo review and analyze the basic information and distribution of core articles in the global research frontier of nursing, so as to ascertain the current trend in the field.MethodsA total of 37 highly cited essential science indicator (ESI) papers in the nursing discipline were retrieved, which were compared with the core article collection of the ESI research frontier in January 2019 to understand the current nursing research frontiers. Subsequently, a statistical analysis of the core articles that constituted the nursing research frontiers was performed using a bibliometric method. The analysis was conducted with multiple aspects including the number of core articles, total number of citations, average publication year, issuing country, participating institution, citing paper, journal distribution, and core researcher.ResultsAt present, the two international research frontiers of nursing are patient-centered care (Research Frontier 1) and missed care (Research Frontier 2). These two frontiers include a total of 12 core articles, 6 of which are highly cited Web of Science-indexed nursing papers. Research Frontier 1 includes three core articles that were cited 389 times. Research Frontier 2 includes nine core articles that were cited 841 times. Articles in the two frontiers were cited by 454 and 841 papers, respectively, most of which are in the United States. In addition, the 12 core articles were published across eight journals, the impact factors of which are all relatively high. Lastly, Research Frontier 1 involves 11 authors, whereas Research Frontier 2 involves 49 authors, of which seven authors have published more than two articles.ConclusionsThe core articles in the frontier of international nursing research demonstrate distinctive features in their issuing country/region, journal distribution, and participating institution. Review and analysis of the core articles of international nursing research frontiers can help nursing staff understand the current research hotspots and consequently perform corresponding scientific research to promote the development of the nursing discipline.
46
Subbarayalu, Arun Vijay, Manuelraj Peter, Mohamed Idhris, et al. "Visualizing highly cited scientific output of Indian physiotherapists: A bibliometric study." F1000Research 9 (March 24, 2020): 207. http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.22390.1.
Full textAbstract:
Background: Physiotherapy research supports the advancement of evidence-based practice and development of a highly skilled workforce. This study aims to visualize highly cited scientific output of Indian physiotherapists from 1999 to 2018. Methods: A descriptive study design was adopted to visualize highly cited scientific output of Indian physiotherapists using the Web of Science (WoS) database from 1999 to 2018. A search was carried out using the following term "((TS=(physiotherapy) OR TS=("physical rehabilitation") OR TS=("physical therapy")) AND AD=(India))Indexes=SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI, A&HCI, CPCI-S, CPCI-SSH, ESCI, CCR-EXPANDED, IC Timespan=1999-2018”. Data collected were analyzed using Incites from WoS and VOSviewer software. Results: A total of 489 articles were published between 1999 and 2018, with a peak of 103 in 2016 with 2420 citations. A decline in publication count was observed after 2016. The journal International Journal of Physiotherapy published the highest number of articles (n=35). Manipal University (n=26) was found to be the most active institution for physiotherapy research in India, as determined by producing the most articles. Indian physiotherapists published the highest number of research articles in collaboration with US authors (n=24). Conclusion: There is an increasing trend in the scientific output of Indian physiotherapists over the past two decades; however, a decline is observed after 2016. It is recommended that research collaborations across the globe are increased and scientific output should be improved, leading to a higher number of citations. Future research should explore factors influencing scientific production of Indian physiotherapists and devise appropriate strategies to attain further improvement.
47
Tsai, Hsin-Luen, and Jia-Fen Wu. "Bibliometric analysis of flipped classroom publications from the Web of Science Core Collection published from 2000 to 2019." Science Editing 7, no. 2 (2020): 163–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.6087/kcse.212.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose: This study analyzed the bibliometric characteristics of flipped classroom publications in the Social Science Citation Index and Science Citation Index Expanded from 2000 to 2019. Methods: The terms related to “flipped classroom” and “inverted learning” were the keywords for searching journal articles on January 3, 2020. Results: There are 645 articles (including 33 early-access articles), representing 1,938 authors in the 210 journals scanned. The United States, China, and Taiwan were three leading countries/regions in this field. In the top 10 countries, to 10 institutions, the top eight most-cited journals were identified by either the number of publications or the number of citations. Hot-spot themes from the 24 highly-cited articles and author keyword co-occurrence analysis focus on empirical research in the flipped classroom, the overall feasibility of the flipped classroom course design and practical model, and students’ performances, and student-regulated learning (active learning and readiness) outcomes. Conclusion: TThe results indicate that the United States dominated flipped classroom research, originating most of the highly-cited articles, having more prolific authors, and presenting the most-cited institutions. Furthermore, little research has been undertaken into arriving at an understanding of evidentiary effectiveness or consistency in a flipped classroom. Based on the trends identified, we need a call for more specific types of research into the effectiveness of flipped classroom studies and systematic reviews.
48
Calma, Angelito. "The “celebrities” in finance: a citation analysis of finance journals." Studies in Economics and Finance 34, no. 2 (2017): 166–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/sef-02-2016-0048.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the ten highly ranked journals in finance, and identify the most published authors, most cited articles, top publishing countries, top publishing universities, top publication years and the most discussed topics using keywords. Design/methodology/approach Using the services of the Web of Science™ (WoS), all the available data about each journal’s published articles were extracted. A total of 6,029 articles containing 23,521 keywords and 208,905 cited references were analysed. Findings Results indicate that Viscusi, Chemmanur and Statman are the most published authors. The most cited article is Fama and French’s (1993) article – Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds – with 522 citations. The most cited author is Eugene Fama with 2,848 citations followed by Michael Jensen with 1,367 citations. USA and England contributed more articles than any other country, where US University of California System ranked first. “Information”, “risk” and “market” were the most discussed topics. Findings from this study reveal not only the popular authors, articles and topics in the scholarly finance literature, but also the lesser-known areas of research, which may need attention. Originality/value It is the first large-scale citation analysis study of its kind, representing data from 178 years of combined publication history.
49
Stankus, Tony. "Is PLOS ONE Attracting Highly Cited Papers in the Food Sciences? Comparing Authors' Most Cited Work to Their PLOS ONE Articles Published 2006–2016." Journal of Agricultural & Food Information 19, no. 1 (2017): 97–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10496505.2017.1363653.
Full text
50
ElHawary, Hassan, Ali Salimi, Nermin Diab, and Lee Smith. "Bibliometric Analysis of Early COVID-19 Research: The Top 50 Cited Papers." Infectious Diseases: Research and Treatment 13 (January 2020): 117863372096293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1178633720962935.
Full textAbstract:
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic is rapidly evolving with the number of cases exponentially rising. The research scientific community has reacted promptly as evidenced by an outstanding number of COVID-19 related publications. As the number of scientific publications rapidly rises, there is a need to dissect the factors that lead to highly impactful publications. To that end, the present paper summarizes the characteristics of the top 50 cited COVID-19-related publications that emerged early during the pandemic. Methods: A systematic search of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar was performed, using keywords related to COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-19. Two independent authors reviewed all the search results, screening for the top 50 cited COVID-19-related articles. Inclusion criteria comprised any publication on COVID-19 or the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Data extracted included the type of study, journal, number of citations, number of authors, country of publication, and study content. Results: As of May 29th, the top 50 cited articles were cited 63849 times during the last 4 months. On average, 14 authors contributed to each publication. Over half of the identified articles were published in only 3 journals. Furthermore, 42% and 26% of the identified articles were retrospective case series and correspondence/viewpoints, respectively, while only 1 article was a randomized controlled trial. In terms of content, almost half (48%) of the identified publications reported clinical/radiological findings while only 7 out of the 50 articles investigated potential treatments. Conclusion: By highlighting the characteristics of the top 50 cited COVID-19-related articles, the authors hope to disseminate information that could assist researchers to identify the important topics, study characteristics, and gaps in the literature.