To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Highly cited publications.
Journal articles on the topic 'Highly cited publications'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Highly cited publications.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
Wilcox, M. Angela, Nickalus R. Khan, Joseph H. McAbee, Frederick A. Boop, and Paul Klimo. "Highly cited publications in pediatric neurosurgery." Child's Nervous System 29, no. 12 (2013): 2201–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00381-013-2228-z.
Full text
2
Martinez, Magdalena, and Creso Sá. "Highly Cited in the South: International Collaboration and Research Recognition Among Brazil’s Highly Cited Researchers." Journal of Studies in International Education 24, no. 1 (2019): 39–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1028315319888890.
Full textAbstract:
For researchers in the global South, international recognition in science arguably involves engaging with the norms, ideas, and people leading research activity in the global North. This article explores the relationship between international research collaboration and the publication activity of highly cited researchers in Brazil, a country that exerts regional leadership in scientific production in Latin America, but remains relatively peripheral to global science. This study examined the career trajectories and publication patterns of highly cited researchers based in Brazilian universities, using Web of Science and CV data. Our findings show a pattern of international mobility among the Brazilian highly cited researchers from the early stages of their careers. With few exceptions, engagement with the academic Anglosphere is central to their achievement of highly cited status, which is derived from co-authored publications with collaborators from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia in large teams.
3
Ho, Yuh-Shan. "Highly Cited Publications in WoS, Biomedical Engineering in Science Citation Index Expanded A Bibliometric Analysis." Biomedicine and Chemical Sciences 1, no. 1 (2022): 24–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.48112/bcs.v1i1.83.
Full textAbstract:
Identified and analyzed highly cited publications in the Web of Science category of biomedical engineering in the last three decades were investigated. Documents that have been cited more than 100 times from Web of Science Core Collection since publication year to the end of 2020 were defined as highly cited publications. The analyzed aspects covered document types, distribution of annual production and its citations per publication, journals, countries, institutes, authors, and the top cited articles. Publication performance of countries and institutions were evaluated by six publication indicators. Y-index was applied to evaluate authors’ publication potential and their publication characteristics. Citation indicators including total citation and citations in 2020 were used to compare the most frequently cited articles. Results shows that most highly cited papers were published in journals with high impact factors. The USA dominated the six publication indicators. The G7 were ranked in the top ten productive countries. Eight of the top ten productive institutes were all located in USA. Results from Y-index shows that highly cited authors had higher proportion of corresponding-author articles and first-author articles. The article by Kokubo and Takadama in 2006 was the most frequently cited and the article by Litjens et al. in 2017 was the most impactful in 2020.
4
Yuh-Shan, Ho. "Highly Cited Publications in WoS, Biomedical Engineering in Science Citation Index Expanded A Bibliometric Analysis." Biomedicine and Chemical Sciences 1, no. 1 (2022): 24–34. https://doi.org/10.48112/bcs.v1i1.83.
Full textAbstract:
Identified and analyzed highly cited publications in the Web of Science category of biomedical engineering in the last three decades were investigated. Documents that have been cited more than 100 times from Web of Science Core Collection since publication year to the end of 2020 were defined as highly cited publications. The analyzed aspects covered document types, distribution of annual production and its citations per publication, journals, countries, institutes, authors, and the top cited articles. Publication performance of countries and institutions were evaluated by six publication indicators. Y-index was applied to evaluate authors’ publication potential and their publication characteristics. Citation indicators including total citation and citations in 2020 were used to compare the most frequently cited articles. Results shows that most highly cited papers were published in journals with high impact factors. The USA dominated the six publication indicators. The G7 were ranked in the top ten productive countries. Eight of the top ten productive institutes were all located in USA. Results from Y-index shows that highly cited authors had higher proportion of corresponding-author articles and first-author articles. The article by Kokubo and Takadama in 2006 was the most frequently cited and the article by Litjens et al. in 2017 was the most impactful in 2020.
5
Wang, Fenghua, Ying Fan, An Zeng, and Zengru Di. "Can we predict ESI highly cited publications?" Scientometrics 118, no. 1 (2018): 109–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2965-6.
Full text
6
Schreiber, Michael. "Inconsistencies in the highly cited publications indicator." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64, no. 6 (2013): 1298–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.22824.
Full text
7
Ding, Zuoqi, and Furong Li. "Publications in Integrative and Complementary Medicine: A Ten-Year Bibliometric Survey in the Field of ICM." Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2020 (October 6, 2020): 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4821950.
Full textAbstract:
Background. This article aims to analyze the research status of integrative complementary medicine (ICM) and features of highly cited papers in the field to provide reference of the future development of ICM. Methods. Publications in the field of ICM from 2009 to 2018 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection. The top 20 countries/territories, institutions, journals, keywords of highly cited and noncited papers, and characteristics of essential science indicator (ESI) papers, as well as open access (OA) and non-OA papers, were analyzed. Results. Mainland China had the largest number of ICM publications. The top 20 journals published a total of 31667 papers in 2009–2018, which represented 92.9% of all publications. Keywords of highly cited and noncited papers point to different research directions. 48 ESI highly cited/hot papers were identified, most of which are related to phytochemistry. Furthermore, the average citation rate (percentage of publications that have been cited one or more times) of OA papers was lower than that of total papers and non-OA papers. Conclusions. China leads in number of publications; however, publication quality in ICM field requires improvement. A few journals accounted for more than half of number of publications and citations, which are important for the development of ICM. Many of the keywords in ICM noncited publications pointed towards broad meaning that poorly reflect the exact research content. Most highly cited ICM studies focused on the identification and evaluation of plant active components. OA may not be an effective approach to increase paper citations in the field of ICM.
8
Khan, Nickalus R., Tyler Auschwitz, Joseph H. McAbee, Frederick A. Boop, and Paul Klimo. "Highly cited publications in pediatric neurosurgery: part 2." Child's Nervous System 29, no. 12 (2013): 2215–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00381-013-2293-3.
Full text
9
Beskaravaynaya, Elena V., and Tatyana N. Kharybina. "Joint research of Russia and Belarus in the field of biotechnology." Library & Information Discourse 2, no. 1 (2022): 22–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.47612/2791-2841-2022-2-1-22-30.
Full textAbstract:
The article presents an analysis of the current state of Russian-Belarusian cooperation in the field of biotechnology for 2011-2021 according to the databases Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus. The dynamics of the publication flow, the most active foreign partners and organizations have been determined, priority areas for cooperation have been identified. As a result of the bibliometric analysis, it was found that the most fruitful in joint research are: Ecology, Agriculture, Experimental Medicine, Scientific Technology, Mycology. The directions with highly cited publications were: Nanotechnology, Medical Chemistry, Cytology, Medical Technologies. The most relevant research, which was already cited in the year of publication, dealt with the development of nanocrystals and nanoplates, the study of programmable materials, the genetics of agricultural plants. As a result of the analysis of the keywords of highly cited and rapidly cited articles, it was concluded that the scientific community is interested in works that have a practical orientation. Based on the ratio of the volume of publications and citations in different scientific fields, the authors proposed topics for further cooperation, priority publications for the publication of articles. The results of the work may be of interest from the point of view of administrative policy, further financing of promising areas, organizing joint research, and establishing scientific ties.
10
Borah, Ranjan, and Margam Madhusudhan. "Altmetric Mapping of Highly-Cited Articles on Plagiarism in India." International Journal of Library and Information Services 12, no. 1 (2023): 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/ijlis.321659.
Full textAbstract:
The study aims to explore the online attention received by the top twenty highly cited publications on plagiarism published between 2011 to 2020 from India by using the observation method. The bibliographical data were collected from SCOPUS database and the altmetric data were collected by using the altmetric harvesting tools AltmetricIt and PlumX. The study's findings show that the citation count and the Altmetric Attention Score of the top twenty highly cited publications on plagiarism published between 2011 to 2020 from India are much lower than those from other countries. The Spearman correlation analysis of the citation count and AAS shows that they are not correlated. The study hopes that in the future, the publications to be published from India on important subjects such as plagiarism will have a more significant online impact on the research community and will help the authors and the publishers to understand the current status of the popularity of their research publications and the impact they have made on the research community.
11
Arumugam, J., and R. Balasubramani. "Scholarly Output of Material Science Research in India: A Scientometric Analysis." Asian Journal of Information Science and Technology 9, no. 1 (2019): 95–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.51983/ajist-2019.9.1.2629.
Full textAbstract:
Material Science is a discipline which elevates the properties of matter and its applications to various areas of science and engineering. This science investigates the relationship between the structure of material and its properties. The researcher has made an attempt to highlight quantitatively and qualitatively the growth and development of scholarly publications by Indian Scientists and researchers on Materials Science during 2009-2018 as reflected in Scopus. This study describes and focuses the various factors such as chronology wise distribution; country wise distribution; ranking of highly cited authors; ranking of highly cited institutions; highly cited journals on Material Science; and predominant funding agencies. The results revealed that the highest number of (16.7%) papers published in 2018 and Journal of Materials Science Materials in Electronics is the predominantly used source for the scholarly publication in Material Science research in India. Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore has the highest number of publications in the Material Science research.
12
Rizki, Iqbal Ainur. "Profile of Top 100 Cited in STEM Education for the Last Twenty Years." JPPS (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains) 12, no. 1 (2022): 69–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v12n1.p69-84.
Full textAbstract:
The research analyzes the top 100 cited publications in STEM education in the last twenty years. The research objectives are to analyze the publication type, year, sources publishing, authorship pattern, institution, country, and keywords pattern and review these top-cited publications using bibliometric analysis. The metadata used in this research is the Scopus database. The study result shows that among these top 100 publications, the most common type of publication is journal articles. Most of these publications were conducted at four-year intervals from 2014 to 2017, with an average citation per paper of 70.75. Belland is recognized as the most productive author, whereas National Research Council has become the institution with the most citations. The most contributed institutions included Purdue University and the University of Minnesota. The USA has led over highly cited publications, followed by Australia and the Netherlands. The research areas in these papers mainly emphasize education, STEM, STEM education, engineering education, and every stem aspect. The review result focus on research on the conceptual framework of STEM integration, STEM-based learning media, challenges to STEM, perspectives on STEM education, and the impact of Covid-19 on STEM education. This research implies finding research novelties about STEM education through the results of mapping and visualization patterns based on keywords that often appear.
13
Ho, Yuh-Shan, and Leila Nemati-Anaraki. "Highly cited publication performance in the ophthalmology category in the Web of Science database: a bibliometric analysis." International Journal of Ophthalmology 16, no. 7 (2023): 1155–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2023.07.22.
Full textAbstract:
AIM: To determine and evaluate the features of highly cited articles (HCAs) in the ophthalmology category in the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) from 1991 to 2020. METHODS: The Web of Science Core Collection documents with at least 100 citations from their publication year until December 31, 2020, were evaluated as highly cited. The examined features were the distribution of yearly output and its average number of per publication, HCAs, authors, institutions, journals, and nations. The publication performance of nations and organizations was assessed using six publication indicators. The Y-index was employed to compare the research outputs of various authors. RESULTS: Publications that had cited the most references were highly published in high-impact factor journals. The United States of America came out on top across all six publication indicators, and it was home to eight of the top 10 most productive institutions. The articles written by Breivik et al (2006) and Farrar et al (2001) were highly cited and had a significant impact in 2020. The authors had a higher number of highly cited articles published as corresponding authors than as first authors. CONCLUSION: The findings of the present study highlight the current scope of global research in ophthalmology. The findings can help policy-makers and advisory groups of research centers to develop future policies. In addition, the findings can guide researchers in this field.
14
Astaño, Jereme. "Scientific Mapping and Network Analysis of Scholarly Works on Short Videos in Education." JOURNAL OF DIGITAL LEARNING AND DISTANCE EDUCATION 3, no. 11 (2025): 1367–82. https://doi.org/10.56778/jdlde.v3i11.471.
Full textAbstract:
This study employs bibliometric analysis to examine research trends and emerging themes using short videos in education. Using 238 records from the Dimensions database, the investigation identifies and describes publication trends, highly cited works, leading journals, most cited authors, active countries, and country collaborations. Results indicate a consistent increase in publications, but citation trends have varied. The most cited study, Glance and colleagues, explores the pedagogical foundations of massive open online courses, while CBE-Life Sciences Education is the most cited journal. Most cited scholars include D. G. Glance, M. Forsey, M. Riley, E. A. van Vliet, N. Brouwer, and J. C. Winnips, with the United States leading in short video research and international collaborations. Co-citation analysis highlights Computers & Education as a frequently cited source and the publications from Frontiers in Psychology, Interactive Learning Environments, and Education and Information Technology. Moreover, bibliographic coupling reveals a close connection between publications on short videos and suggests strong shared intellectual content. Four themes emerge from short video publications: (1) addressing educational needs through digital learning innovations, (2) technology integration in teaching and learning in higher education, (3) short videos in post-pandemic education: opportunities and challenges, and (4) social media as a learning tool: the impact of platforms on student engagement and academic performance. Overall, this study offers valuable insights into publication trends on short videos and provides practical recommendations for future research and practice.
15
Jayasekara, P. K., and K. S. Abu. "Top Fifty Highly Cited Publications on the Internet of Things." Journal of the University Librarians Association of Sri Lanka 21, no. 2 (2018): 140. http://dx.doi.org/10.4038/jula.v21i2.7922.
Full text
16
Ho, Yuh-Shan, and James Hartley. "Highly cited publications in World War II: a bibliometric analysis." Scientometrics 110, no. 2 (2016): 1065–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2199-4.
Full text
17
Hsu, Y. H. E., and Y. S. Ho. "Highly Cited Articles in Health Care Sciences and Services Field in Science Citation Index Expanded." Methods of Information in Medicine 53, no. 06 (2014): 446–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.3414/me14-01-0022.
Full textAbstract:
SummaryObjective: This study aimed to identify and analyze characteristics of highly cited articles published in the Web of Science category of health care sciences and services from 1958 to 2012.Methods: Articles that have been cited at least 100 times were assessed regarding publication outputs, distribution of outputs in journals, publications of authors, institutions, countries as well as citation life cycles of the articles with the highest total citations since its publication up to 2012 and the highest citations in 2012. Six bibliometric indicators were used to evaluate source countries, institutions, and authors. Total citations from the time the articles were first published to the end of 2012 and citations in 2012 only were applied. Additionally, Y-index was applied to evaluate publication characteristics of authors. A high percentage of authors had the same numbers of first author and corresponding author status of highly cited articles in health care sciences and services field.Results: Results showed that 890 of the most highly referenced articles, published between 1977 and 2009, had been cited at least 100 times. Medical Care and Journal of General Internal Medicine published the most highly cited articles. The United States produced 76% of highly cited articles and also published the most number of independent, internationally collaborative, first authored, corresponding authored, and single author highly cited articles. The Harvard University was the most productive institute and was number one for the total highly cited articles, inter-institutionally collaborative articles, single institution articles, first author articles, and corresponding author articles.Conclusions: The application of quantitative techniques in the analysis of highly cited articles can improve the researchers’ understanding of the directions in health care sciences and services field. Y-index is useful for the evaluation of contributing authors.
18
ElHawary, Hassan, Ali Salimi, Nermin Diab, and Lee Smith. "Bibliometric Analysis of Early COVID-19 Research: The Top 50 Cited Papers." Infectious Diseases: Research and Treatment 13 (January 2020): 117863372096293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1178633720962935.
Full textAbstract:
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic is rapidly evolving with the number of cases exponentially rising. The research scientific community has reacted promptly as evidenced by an outstanding number of COVID-19 related publications. As the number of scientific publications rapidly rises, there is a need to dissect the factors that lead to highly impactful publications. To that end, the present paper summarizes the characteristics of the top 50 cited COVID-19-related publications that emerged early during the pandemic. Methods: A systematic search of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar was performed, using keywords related to COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-19. Two independent authors reviewed all the search results, screening for the top 50 cited COVID-19-related articles. Inclusion criteria comprised any publication on COVID-19 or the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Data extracted included the type of study, journal, number of citations, number of authors, country of publication, and study content. Results: As of May 29th, the top 50 cited articles were cited 63849 times during the last 4 months. On average, 14 authors contributed to each publication. Over half of the identified articles were published in only 3 journals. Furthermore, 42% and 26% of the identified articles were retrospective case series and correspondence/viewpoints, respectively, while only 1 article was a randomized controlled trial. In terms of content, almost half (48%) of the identified publications reported clinical/radiological findings while only 7 out of the 50 articles investigated potential treatments. Conclusion: By highlighting the characteristics of the top 50 cited COVID-19-related articles, the authors hope to disseminate information that could assist researchers to identify the important topics, study characteristics, and gaps in the literature.
19
Gregoriou, Stamatios, Aikaterini Tsiogka, and Dimitris Rigopoulos. "Bibliometric Trends in Nail Psoriasis Research Publications." Skin Appendage Disorders 8, no. 2 (2021): 122–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000519191.
Full textAbstract:
<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Bibliometric analysis provides an objective assessment of current research patterns and highlights the impact of selected publications in any given scientific discipline. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We sought to provide information about dynamic research trends in nail psoriasis by analyzing the 50 most cited articles on this topic, which were identified utilizing the Scopus citation database. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The median number of citations was 79 (range, 60–337) per article. Publication dates ranged from 1969 to 2020, while the majority of articles (46%) were published between 2000 and 2009. The top 50 highly cited articles were published in 19 different journals, with a median impact factor of 5.248 (range, 1.022–16.102). The <i>British Journal of Dermatology</i> published the greatest number of highly cited articles (<i>n</i> = 9). Most publications were original articles, and most cited research topics included medical treatment and correlation of nail psoriasis with psoriatic arthritis. Most publications originated from the USA and UK, while Phoebe Rich and Dennis McGonagle were the two most contributing authors. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> This analysis provides information about emerging bibliometric trends and may guide future research in the field of nail psoriasis.
20
Seivright, Justine R., Alyssa M. Thompson, Natalie M. Villa, Vivian Y. Shi, and Jennifer L. Hsiao. "Bibliometric Analysis of the 50 Most Cited Publications in Hidradenitis Suppurativa." Skin Appendage Disorders 7, no. 3 (2021): 173–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000513771.
Full textAbstract:
<b><i>Background:</i></b> Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) has historically been a neglected disease. However, research in this field has grown exponentially in the past decade. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The top-cited HS articles from 1950 to 2020 were analyzed for authorship, study topic, study design, and senior author country of origin. <b><i>Results:</i></b> We found that nearly half of the top 50 cited articles were published in the last decade, with a recent increase in the number of highly cited randomized controlled trials. Medical treatment is the most cited topic, with more attention on biologics over time. The past decade has seen an increase in highly cited articles on HS comorbidities, pathogenesis, and clinical practice guidelines. There has been a predominance of highly cited HS research from Europe; highly cited studies from Africa, Asia, Australia, and South America are lacking. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Recent advances in HS research have focused on investigating HS pathogenesis and drug development, highlighting disease comorbidities, and improving evidence-based care. Studies in pathogenesis have translated into a paradigm shift in medical treatment from antibiotics to incorporation of targeted therapies in recent years. Encouraging growth of HS research in countries outside of North America and Europe may help to optimize HS care globally.
21
Astaño, Jereme. "Scientific Mapping and Network Analysis of Scholarly Works on Short Videos in Education." Journal of Digital Learning and Distance Education (JDLDE) 3, no. 11 (2025): 1367–82. https://doi.org/10.56778/jdlde.v3i11.471.
Full textAbstract:
This study employs bibliometric analysis to examine research trends and emerging themes using short videos in education. Using 238 records from the Dimensions database, the investigation identifies and describes publication trends, highly cited works, leading journals, most cited authors, active countries, and country collaborations. Results indicate a consistent increase in publications, though citation trends have fluctuated. The most cited study, Glance and colleagues, explores the pedagogical foundations of massive open online courses, while <em>CBE-Life Sciences Education </em>is the most cited journal. Most cited scholars include D. G. Glance, M. Forsey, M. Riley, E. A. van Vliet, N. Brouwer, and J. C. Winnips, with the United States leading in short video research and international collaborations. Co-citation analysis highlights <em>Computers & Education </em>as a frequently cited source and the publications from <em>Frontiers in Psychology, Interactive Learning Environments, </em>and <em>Education and Information Technology</em>. Moreover, bibliographic coupling reveals a close connection between publication on short videos and suggests a strong shared intellectual content. Four themes emerge from short video publications: (1) addressing educational needs through digital learning innovations, (2) technology integration in teaching and learning in higher education, (3) short videos in post-pandemic education: opportunities and challenges, and (4) social media as a learning tool: the impact of platforms on student engagement and academic performance. Overall, this study offers valuable insights into publication trends on short videos and provides practical recommendations for future research and practice.
22
Hsu, Y.-Hsin Elsa, Ya-Ting Yang, Ming-Huang Wang, and Yuh-Shan Ho. "Bibliometric analysis of highly cited publications in health policy and Services." COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management 14, no. 1 (2020): 177–202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2020.1816513.
Full text
23
Starodubov, V. I., N. G. Kurakova, L. A. Tsvetkova, and Yu V. Polyakova. "Analysis of the internationalized highly cited segment of national surgery publications." Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova, no. 11 (2020): 137. http://dx.doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia2020111137.
Full text
24
Zahedi, Zohreh, Rodrigo Costas, and Paul Wouters. "Mendeley readership as a filtering tool to identify highly cited publications." Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 68, no. 10 (2017): 2511–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.23883.
Full text
25
Yan, Li, and Lihua Liu. "Bibliometric analysis of the highly cited publications in COVID-19 vaccine." Heliyon 9, no. 8 (2023): e18540. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18540.
Full text
26
Jamali, Seyedh Mahboobeh, Zain Ahmad Nurulazam Md, Mohd Ali Samsudin, and Ebrahim Nader Ale. "Publication Trends in Physics Education: A Bibliometric study." Journal of Educational Research 35 (June 2, 2015): 19–36. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.801889.
Full textAbstract:
A publication trend in Physics Education by employing bibliometric analysis leads the researchers to describe current scientific movement. This paper tries to answer “What do Physics education scientists concentrate in their publications?” by analyzing the productivity and development of publications on the subject category of Physics Education in the period 1980–2013. The Web of Science databases in the research areas of “EDUCATION - EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH” was used to extract the publication trends. The study involves 1360 publications, including 840 articles, 503 proceedings paper, 22 reviews, 7 editorial material, 6 Book review, and one Biographical item. Number of publications with “Physical Education” in topic increased from 0.14 % (n = 2) in 1980 to 16.54 % (n = 225) in 2011. Total number of receiving citations is 8071, with approximately citations per papers of 5.93. The results show the publication and citations in Physic Education has increased dramatically while the Malaysian share is well ranked
27
Ioannidis, John P. A., Angelo Maria Pezzullo, Antonio Cristiano, Stefania Boccia, and Jeroen Baas. "Linking citation and retraction data reveals the demographics of scientific retractions among highly cited authors." PLOS Biology 23, no. 1 (2025): e3002999. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002999.
Full textAbstract:
Retractions are becoming increasingly common but still account for a small minority of published papers. It would be useful to generate databases where the presence of retractions can be linked to impact metrics of each scientist. We have thus incorporated retraction data in an updated Scopus-based database of highly cited scientists (top 2% in each scientific subfield according to a composite citation indicator). Using data from the Retraction Watch database (RWDB), retraction records were linked to Scopus citation data. Of 55,237 items in RWDB as of August 15, 2024, we excluded non-retractions, retractions clearly not due to any author error, retractions where the paper had been republished, and items not linkable to Scopus records. Eventually, 39,468 eligible retractions were linked to Scopus. Among 217,097 top-cited scientists in career-long impact and 223,152 in single recent year (2023) impact, 7,083 (3.3%) and 8,747 (4.0%), respectively, had at least 1 retraction. Scientists with retracted publications had younger publication age, higher self-citation rates, and larger publication volume than those without any retracted publications. Retractions were more common in the life sciences and rare or nonexistent in several other disciplines. In several developing countries, very high proportions of top-cited scientists had retractions (highest in Senegal (66.7%), Ecuador (28.6%), and Pakistan (27.8%) in career-long citation impact lists). Variability in retraction rates across fields and countries suggests differences in research practices, scrutiny, and ease of retraction. Addition of retraction data enhances the granularity of top-cited scientists’ profiles, aiding in responsible research evaluation. However, caution is needed when interpreting retractions, as they do not always signify misconduct; further analysis on a case-by-case basis is essential. The database should hopefully provide a resource for meta-research and deeper insights into scientific practices.
28
Sharma, Navni, Vimal Arora, Gaurav Joshi, Bhupendra Gopalbhai Prajapati, and Akshay Parihar. "Role of nanoparticles in pancreatic drug delivery: Including a bibliography on Targeted drug delivery." IP International Journal of Comprehensive and Advanced Pharmacology 8, no. 2 (2023): 112–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.18231/j.ijcaap.2023.019.
Full textAbstract:
The number of times a publication or an individual author has been discussed in the scientific community is a common metric for measuring their impact. The goal of the bibliometric study was to look at the maximum cited articles in the area of "pancreatic cancer, nanoparticles, targeted ligand, binding, drug delivery and treatment.".The database SCOPUS was used to conduct a computerised literature search. The top 100 articles with the most citations were chosen and studied furtherThere were 298 citations in the most cited article, with an average of 62 citations per publication. These highly cited publications appeared in 33 journals, with the Journal of Controlled Release leading the pack (27 articles). The United States contributed 53 articles, which originated from 19 different countries. These 100 citations were provided by 85 institutions, with the “Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering” leading the way (4). The investigation of the top highly cited articles concedes for recognizing significant advances in pancreatic cancer targeted drug delivery study and gives a historical perspective on the advancement of this speciality of cancer research.
29
Scheidsteger, Thomas, and Robin Haunschild. "Telling the story of solar energy meteorology into the satellite era by applying (co-citation) reference publication year spectroscopy." Scientometrics 125, no. 2 (2020): 1159–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03597-0.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractStudying the history of research fields by analyzing publication records and topical and/or keyword searches with reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS) has been introduced as a powerful tool to identify the corresponding root publications. However, for some research fields (e.g., rather new and interdisciplinary fields) like solar energy meteorology, encompassing such research fields via a keyword- or topic-based search query is not feasible to get a reasonably exhaustive publication set. Therefore, we apply its variant RPYS-CO to all publications co-cited with two highly important marker papers, using the cited references explorer for inspecting the RPYS-CO results. We obtain two lists of seminal papers, which are able to adequately tell us the story of solar energy meteorology up to the 1990s, respectively in its subfield using satellite-based methods for solar irradiance estimation even to very recent years. Consequently, we recommend this method to gain valuable insights in (new) research fields.
30
Sitimuawanah, Azliyana Azizan, Nova Relida Samosir, Renni Hidayati Zein, Ismaningsih, and Susi Endrini. "A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis Trend of the Top 100 Most Cited Publications in Frailty Research." Jurnal teknologi Kesehatan Borneo 5, no. 2 (2024): 88–103. https://doi.org/10.30602/jtkb.v5i2.372.
Full textAbstract:
Frailty among older adults is a critical health issue with complex dimensions. This study presents a bibliometric analysis of frailty literature from 1990 to 2023, focusing on publication trends, leading contributors, and highly cited works.Methods: Using Web of Science and Scopus databases, the top 100 publications were analyzed to identify key countries, institutions, and research themes shaping the field. Results indicate a consistent growth in frailty-related research, with Web of Science emerging as a primary source. Leading countries and institutions demonstrate varying contributions, while highly cited papers highlight pivotal advancements. The findings underscore disparities in global research output and the role of influential journals in shaping geriatric health discourse. This analysis provides valuable insights into research gaps and serves as a guide for future studies and interventions in frailty management.
31
Ma, Qian, Yandan Li, and Yan Zhang. "Informetric Analysis of Highly Cited Papers in Environmental Sciences Based on Essential Science Indicators." International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 11 (2020): 3781. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113781.
Full textAbstract:
Highly cited papers in the Essential Science Indicators database refer to papers with citations in the top 1% of all papers in a research field, and they are considered to be symbols of scientific excellence and top performance of the past ten years. This study provided an informetric analysis of 7791 highly cited papers in the environmental sciences category during 2009–2019. Informetric indicators and visualization tools were applied to evaluate and present the performances of journals, countries/territories, institutions, top cited papers, and research hotspots. The results showed that the cumulative number of publications has increased exponentially, suggesting strong development of the environmental sciences category. There were 211 journals publishing highly cited papers, with Energy & Environmental Science as the leading journal. The USA ranked first with the highest number of publications and occupied the core position in the collaboration network, while Mainland China took the first place in independent research output. Review articles have an obvious advantage in terms of achieving high citations. “Adsorption”, “climate change”, and “heavy metal” were the most frequent keywords, with “microplastic” rising rapidly as a new research frontier in recent years. Five research hotspots were visualized from highly cited papers via cluster analysis.
32
Prahani, Binar Kurnia, Khoirun Nisa', Budi Jatmiko, Nadi Suprapto, Tan Amelia, and Emilia Candrawati. "The Comparison of the Top 100 Cited Publications of Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality for the Last Thirty Years." International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering (iJOE) 18, no. 06 (2022): 13–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v18i06.30069.
Full textAbstract:
The development of technology like mobile devices, computers and other smart devices is developing rapidly, especially AR and VR technologies. This study describes comparison among 100 cited papers in the field of AR and VR studies. Research data covering the top one hundred cited publications for the last thirty years were obtained from the Scopus database. Article is most publication document type. The majority of these top-cited papers were published in 2005 for VR and 2013 for AR. The journal Computer and Education is the primary source of the Elsevier, which governs the publication of the most influential AR-VR studies. Most research articles have multiple authors. Slater and Feiner are recognized as the most productive author. The United States dominates the production of highly cited AR-VR papers. Future research should focus on other disciplines, use one or more keywords, and collaborate with Google Scholar, the Web of Science data, for in-depth analysis.
33
Nieder, Carsten, Anca L. Grosu, and Minesh P. Mehta. "Brain Metastases Research 1990–2010: Pattern of Citation and Systematic Review of Highly Cited Articles." Scientific World Journal 2012 (2012): 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/721598.
Full textAbstract:
Background. High and continuously increasing research activity related to different aspects of prevention, prediction, diagnosis and treatment of brain metastases has been performed between 1990 and 2010. One of the major databases contains 2695 scientific articles that were published during this time period. Different measures of impact, visibility, and quality of published research are available, each with its own pros and cons. For this overview, article citation rate was chosen.Results. Among the 10 most cited articles, 7 reported on randomized clinical trials. Nine covered surgical or radiosurgical approaches and the remaining one a widely adopted prognostic score. Overall, 30 randomized clinical trials were published between 1990 and 2010, including those with phase II design and excluding duplicate publications, for example, after longer followup or with focus on secondary endpoints. Twenty of these randomized clinical trials were published before 2008. Their median number of citations was 110, range 13–1013, compared to 5-6 citations for all types of publications. Annual citation rate appeared to gradually increase during the first 2-3 years after publication before reaching high levels.Conclusions. A large variety of preclinical and clinical topics achieved high numbers of citations. However, areas such as quality of life, side effects, and end-of-life care were underrepresented. Efforts to increase their visibility might be warranted.
34
Nassa, Anil Kumar, Jagdish Arora, Priyanka Singh, et al. "Five Years of India Rankings NIRF and its Impact on Performance Parameters of Engineering Institutions in India Pt 2 Research and Professional Practices." DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology 41, no. 02 (2021): 116–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.14429/djlit.41.02.16674.
Full textAbstract:
This article analyses data on five years of India Rankings to assess its impact on performance parameters of institutions of higher education in terms of publications, citations, patents, highly-cited publications and research funding under broad category of parameter named “Research and Professional Practices”. The analysis on data on five years of India Rankings, i.e. 2016 to 2020 on various performance parameters of HEIs provides an interesting insight and reveals that participating institutions are making strenuous effort to improve their performance on various parameters or sub-parameters identified by the NIRF for ranking of HEIs. It is note that the number of publications, citations, and highly-cited publications (HCP) by eligible applicant institutions have increased exponentially over a period of five years from 2016 to 2020. It is interesting to note that per cent of publications, citations, and HCP by the 100 top-ranked institutions has decreased with corresponding increase of publications, citations, and HCP of the remaining institutions. This trend indicates that a good number of remaining institutions have not only intensified their research and publications activities but are also attracting their share of citations. It is also observed that a significant number of NIRF eligible applicants did not have any publication, however, per cent of institutions having “0” publications have decreasing gradually every year from 2017 to 2020. Noticeable and consistent increase in total publications of India, NIRF Eligible Applicants, 100 top-ranked institutions and remaining institutions in Overall category was noticed during past four years, i.e. 2017 to 2020. However, per cent increase in publications of the 100 top-ranked institutions was the highest in overall category.
35
Song, Xue, Jiaqi Wang, Lu Bai, and Wei Zou. "Bibliometric Analysis of 100 Most Highly Cited Publications on Acupuncture for Migraine." Journal of Pain Research Volume 16 (March 2023): 725–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/jpr.s396909.
Full text
36
Dardas, Latefa Ali, Malik Sallam, Amanda Woodward, Nadia Sweis, Narjes Sweis, and Faleh A. Sawair. "Evaluating Research Impact Based on Semantic Scholar Highly Influential Citations, Total Citations, and Altmetric Attention Scores: The Quest for Refined Measures Remains Illusive." Publications 11, no. 1 (2023): 5. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/publications11010005.
Full textAbstract:
Background: The evaluation of scholarly articles’ impact has been heavily based on the citation metrics despite the limitations of this approach. Therefore, the quest for meticulous and refined measures to evaluate publications’ impact is warranted. Semantic Scholar (SS) is an artificial intelligence-based database that allegedly identifies influential citations defined as “Highly Influential Citations” (HICs). Citations are considered highly influential according to SS when the cited publication has a significant impact on the citing publication (i.e., the citer uses or extends the cited work). Altmetrics are measures of online attention to research mined from activity in online tools and environments. Aims: The current study aimed to explore whether SS HICs provide an added value when it comes to measuring research impact compared to total citation counts and Altmetric Attention Score (AAS). Methods: Dimensions was used to generate the dataset for this study, which included COVID-19-related scholarly articles published by researchers affiliated to Jordanian institutions. Altmetric Explorer was selected as an altmetrics harvesting tool, while Semantic Scholar was used to extract details related to HICs. A total of 618 publications comprised the final dataset. Results: Only 4.57% (413/9029) of the total SS citations compiled in this study were classified as SS HICs. Based on SS categories of citations intent, 2626 were background citations (29.08%, providing historical context, justification of importance, and/or additional information related to the cited paper), 358 were result citations (3.97%, that extend on findings from research that was previously conducted), and 263 were method citations (2.91%, that use the previously established procedures or experiments to determine whether the results are consistent with findings in related studies). No correlation was found between HICs and AAS (r = 0.094). Manual inspection of the results revealed substantial contradictions, flaws, and inconsistencies in the SS HICs tool. Conclusions: The use of SS HICs in gauging research impact is significantly limited due to the enigmatic method of its calculation and total dependence on artificial intelligence. Along with the already documented drawbacks of total citation counts and AASs, continuous evaluation of the existing tools and the conception of novel approaches are highly recommended to improve the reliability of publication impact assessment.
37
Dahlawi, Saad, Ritesh G. Menezes, Mohammad Ajmal Khan, Abu Waris, Saifullah, and Mirza Muhammad Naseer. "Medical negligence in healthcare organizations and its impact on patient safety and public health: a bibliometric study." F1000Research 10 (March 3, 2021): 174. http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.37448.1.
Full textAbstract:
Background: Medical negligence is an increasing public health concern among healthcare providers worldwide as it affects patient safety. It poses a significant risk of patient injury, disease, disability, or death. The WHO has recognized deficiencies in patient safety as a global healthcare issue to be addressed. This study aimed to analyze various components of medical negligence research literature. Methods: Bibliographic data visualizations tools like Biblioshiny (RStudio) and VOSviewer were used besides MS Excel to examine the types of documents, annual scientific production, top contributing authors and their impact, authorship patterns and collaboration, top contributing countries and organizations, most significant sources of publication, most cited documents, and most frequently used keywords. Bibliometric methods were used to analyze the bibliographic records of research output on medical negligence downloaded from the Web of Science Core Collection. Results: The annual productivity of medical negligence research was increasing gradually. The most productive period for medical negligence research was 2011-2020. Bird contributed the highest number of publications to medical negligence literature while Brennan emerged as the highly cited author. Single-authored publications on medical negligence were not highly cited. The United States was the highest contributing country and the University of South Florida was the highest contributing organization while Harvard University was a highly cited organization. Nine out of the top ten contributing organizations were academic institutions and most of them belonged to the United States. The most important sources of publication on this topic were The Lancet and British Medical Journal. Localio et al. was the most important research article on medical negligence research. Conclusion: Due to increasing attention on this topic, there was a sharp increase in the research output on medical negligence. This is of significance as the WHO set in motion a patient safety program almost two decades ago.
38
Yaroshenko, Tetiana, and Oleksandra Yaroshenko. "Highly Cited Documents of Ukrainian Scholars in Citation Databases: Correlation of Bibliometric Indicators." Ukrainian Journal on Library and Information Science, no. 5 (June 19, 2020): 108–26. https://doi.org/10.31866/2616-7654.5.2020.205734.
Full textAbstract:
The purpose of this work is to review the potential use of scientometric and bibliometric indicators to assess the results of scientific activities and outline current trends and correlations of data and indicators of highly cited documents of Ukrainian authors in leading citation databases. Based on the analysis of selected documents and citations of Ukrainian researchers in three citation databases Dimensions, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, as well as taking into account some indicators of Altmetrics and using indicators such as Scopus Citation benchmarking, Plum X Metrics for time period of 2017–2019, this paper highlights the features, trends and correlations of individual indicators for highly cited publications of Ukrainian researchers. There are a number of examples illustrating the study. It was found that the first ten highly cited documents of Ukrainian authors are the work of a large number of co-authors, in particular foreign ones, at the same time there are documents where scientists with Ukrainian affiliation are the main authors; top-list journals are not Ukrainian sources; most Ukrainian-affiliated documents obtained from searches in leading citation databases are published in journals with open access publication model, although the absence of full text and mention of the document on the Internet does not mean the absence of citations, if it is of interest to the scientific community; documents from Ukrainian authorsreceived the most citations in the following fields of knowledge: medical, physical, mathematical, computer and chemical sciences. The authors of this study confirm, in particular, the obtained data correlate between the number of citations and the international academic partnership, access type and type of publication, source and place of publication, etc.
39
S, Satish, Sylvia Grace J, Vasna Joshua, and Prabakaran M. "Scientometric Research Mapping of OMICRON for Scientific Production: A Global Perception Analysis." National Journal of Community Medicine 14, no. 03 (2023): 187–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.55489/njcm.140320232593.
Full textAbstract:
Background: South Africa reported a new variant of SARS-CoV-2, named 'Omicron,' to the World Health Organization on November 24, 2021. Scientometric analysis quantify all currently available written communication, the authors of that communication, and their citation analysis. The study's goal was to use the Scopus and Web of Science databases to look at the research metrics of Omicron publications published between January 1965 and March 2020. Methods: All scientific research outputs with the word 'Omicron' in the title were retrieved from the Web of Science (January 1965 to March 2022) and Scopus (January 1896 to March 2022) databases on April 10, 2022. The data was analyzed based on year-wise publications; leading authors; predominant journals in publishing, highly cited articles with citations; type of publications; subject classification, frequently used keywords, geographical distribution of publication, language, and more contributed institutions. Results: There were 1229 research outputs for WoS and 655 from Scopus. The number of publications for WoS increased from 22 in 1965 to 265 in 2022, while Scopus increased from 1 in 1896 to 356 in 2022. Both the databases identified the author Yuen KY as the highest contributor; Journal of Virology and Nature as the predominant journals; the Lancet as highly cited journal; majority as original articles; frequently used keywords as 'SARS-CoV-2'; the United States of America as the most productive country; majority publication in English. The publications were mainly on the subjects Chemistry and Medicine by WoS and Scopus, respectively. The most productive institute was the ‘University of California Systems’ by WoS and the ‘University of Hong Kong’ by Scopus. Conclusion: The term 'Omicron' first appeared in the domain of Chemistry in the late 18th century. The growth pattern of publication was not consistent. The above research metrics will be helpful to researchers in the coming days.
40
Kolle, Shankar Reddy, M. S. Vijayashree, and T. H. Shankarappa. "Highly cited articles in malaria research: a bibliometric analysis." Collection Building 36, no. 2 (2017): 45–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/cb-10-2016-0028.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to reveal the bibliometric characteristics of highly cited articles in Malaria research for the period of 1991-2015. Design/methodology/approach The data of highly cited articles for the period of 1991 to 2015 were extracted from the Science Citation Index Expended of Web of Science. The keyword “Malaria” was used as topic term to search documents that contained this word in the title or keyword or abstract of the documents that published in 1991 to 2015. A total of 1,614 articles having TC2015 = 100 were retrieved as highly cited articles for further analysis, and Microsoft excel was used for the analysis purpose. Findings A total of 1,614 of highly cited articles were published in the 230 journals for the period of 1991 to 2015, and majority of the articles were appeared in journals that have top impact factor. The articles published in the 2011s have greater average citations and authors per article. Six journals have produced almost a quarter of highly cited articles and remaining articles were published in 224 journals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA was the most productive journal with 154 articles, which accounts for 9.53 per cent of the total articles, followed by Lancet (110; 6.81 per cent). We found degree collaboration value of 0.971 for the articles, which indicates the clear dominance of multiple authors in publication of highly cited articles in Malaria research. In this study, new indictor called P index was applied for the evaluation of the author’s productivity. As per the p-value, the White, NJ has emerged as the most productive author with the p-value of 0.41 (61 articles), followed by Marsh, K (p = 0.33), Nosten, F (p = 0.32) and Snow, RW (p = 0.31). The USA and the UK were the most productive countries. The article entitled as “Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of population health data” contributed by Lopez et al. (2006) was the most cited article with 2,245 citations in 2015. Research limitations/implications The data for the present study was limited to the publications that indexed in Science Citation index Expended of Web of Science. Originality/value This paper would be useful to the researchers to know the trends and achievements in the Malaria research and also to the library and information science professionals in collection building process.
41
Funada, Satoshi, Takashi Yoshioka, Yan Luo, et al. "Global Trends in Highly Cited Studies in COVID-19 Research." JAMA Network Open 6, no. 9 (2023): e2332802. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.32802.
Full textAbstract:
ImportanceSince the onset of the COVID-19 outbreak, an extremely high number of studies have been published worldwide, with variable quality. Research trends of highly cited papers may enable identification of influential research, providing insights for new research ideas; it is therefore important to investigate trends and focus on more influential publications in COVID-19–related studies.ObjectiveTo examine research trends of highly cited studies by conducting a bibliometric analysis of highly cited studies in the previous 2 months about COVID-19.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this cross-sectional study, Essential Science Indicators (ESI) and Web of Science (WOS) Core Collection were used to find studies with a focus on COVID-19 that were identified as highly cited studies from Clarivate Analytics. Highly cited studies were extracted from the ESI database bimonthly between January 2020 and December 2022. Bibliographic details were extracted from WOS and combined with ESI data using unique accession numbers. The number of highly cited studies was counted based on the fractional counting method. Data were analyzed from January through July 2023.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe number of publications by research field, country, and institutional affiliation.ResultsThe number of published COVID-19–related highly cited studies was 14 studies in January to February 2020, peaked at 1292 studies in November to December 2021, and showed a downward trend thereafter, reaching 649 studies in November to December 2022. China had the highest number of highly cited studies per 2-month period until July to August 2020 (138.3 studies vs 103.7 studies for the US, the second highest country), and the US had the greatest number of highly cited studies afterward (159.9 studies vs 157.6 studies for China in September to October 2020). Subsequently, the number of highly cited studies per 2-month period published by China declined (decreasing from 179.7 studies in November to December 2020 to 40.7 studies in September to October 2022), and the UK produced the second largest number of such studies in May to June 2021 (171.3 studies). Similarly, the top 5 institutional affiliations in May to June 2020 by highly cited studies per 2-month period were from China (Huazhong University: 14.7 studies; University of Hong Kong: 6.8 studies; Wuhan University: 4.8 studies; Zhejiang University: 4.5 studies; Fudan University: 4.5 studies), while in November to December 2022, the top 5 institutions were in the US and UK (Harvard University: 15.0 studies; University College London: 11.0 studies; University of Oxford: 10.2 studies; University of London: 9.9 studies; Imperial College London: 5.8 studies).Conclusions and RelevanceThis study found that the total number of highly cited studies related to COVID-19 peaked at the end of 2021 and showed a downward trend until the end of 2022, while the origin of these studies shifted from China to the US and UK.
42
Rai, Somesh, Kunwar Singh, and Akhilesh Kumar Varma. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Deep Web Research during 1997 to 2019." DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology 40, no. 02 (2020): 452–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.14429/djlit.40.02.15461.
Full textAbstract:
This study provides a bibliometric account of global deep web research published from 1997 to 2019. A total of 1995 records were imported from the Scopus database in a bibtex file. The bibliometrix package in RStudio was used for analyses. Publication Growth, Citations, Authorship, Country and Affiliations has been analysed. It was found that deep web research had a slow growth rate. In the last four years it has seen a recovery in the growth rate. Furthermore, this study shows the distribution of highly cited papers in the field over 23 years. It shows the country and institutional affiliation pattern of prolific authors. It also presents the most preferred sources, search terms and preferred medium of research communication. It is found that deep web research had a slow growth rate, but since 2016 it is picking up. China is the leading contributor of publications followed by the United States of America, Japan, and the United Kingdom. India is the fifth largest contributor. Contribution of citable publications has been led by Canada and USA with 81.9 per cent of efficiency followed by Australia (79.7 %), France (73.4 %) and Spain (73.1 %). It is also found that most of the prolific authors (by number of publications) do not appear in highly cited publications’ list. Deep web researchers mostly preferred using conference publications to communicate their findings. ‘Machine Learning’ and ‘cryptomarkets’ are two contemporarily popular terms being used by deep web researchers also, which indicates interest towards these topics.
43
Ahmad, Khurshid, Arslan Sheikh, and Muhammad Rafi. "Scholarly research in Library and Information Science: an analysis based on ISI Web of Science." Performance Measurement and Metrics 21, no. 1 (2019): 18–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/pmm-06-2019-0024.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present a quantitative analysis of the Library and Information Science (LIS) scholarly literature published worldwide. Design/methodology/approach The ISI Web of Science database was used as a source for extracting the data of published documents during the period 2003–2017. The analysis of the published literature was based on the following indicators: research productivity of each county, annual publications, annual citations, highly cited articles, highly cited LIS journals, most productive institutions in the field of LIS and most prolific authors. The types of documents included in this study were research articles, conference proceeding papers, book reviews and editorials. Findings The findings revealed that the USA had the highest overall output of LIS scholarly publications. The year 2016 was identified as the most productive year for the number of publications, whereas 2017 was identified as the most productive year for the number of citations. “Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar” was the most highly cited article. The Journal of Medical Library Association was the most highly cited journal in LIS. Indiana University from the USA was the most productive LIS research institution. Mike Thelwall, from the UK, is identified as the most prolific author in LIS. Originality/value The study will be of interest for those researchers, who intend to conduct bibliometric research studies in LIS.
44
Gupta, Ritu. "Global Research on Tinospora cordifolia (Medicinal Plant) with Special Reference to India: A Scientometric Assessment Publications Output during 2001-2016." International Journal of Pharmacognosy & Chinese Medicine 2, no. 4 (2018): 1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.23880/ipcm-16000141.
Full textAbstract:
The paper examines 865 global and 747 Indian publications on Tinospora cordifolia research, as indexed in international Scopus database during 2001-2016. Indian research output experienced an annual average growth rate of 11.85%, global publication share of 86.36%, international collaborative publication share of 7.50% and qualitative citation impact averaged to 15.15 citations per paper. Pharmacology, toxicology & pharmaceutics, among subjects, accounted for the highest publications share (57.30%) in Indian output, followed by medicine (33.60%), biochemistry, genetics & molecular biology (23.83%), agricultural & biological sciences (16.06%), chemistry (5.62%), immunology & microbiology (4.55%), environmental science (4.28%) and veterinary science (2.95%) during 2001-2016.The top 15 most productive Indian research organizations and the authors collectively contributed 24.23% and 14.73% respectively as their Indian publication share and 42.70% and 16.59% respectively as their Indian citation share during 2001-2016. Among the total Indian journal output with 98.39% Indian share, the top 20 journals contributed 31.32% share to the Indian journal output during 2001-2016. Of the total Tinospora cordifolia Indian research output, the top 18 highly cited publications registered citations from 104 to 1014 and they together received 4110 citations, with 228.33 citations per paper. These 18highly cited papers involved the participation of 72 authors and 33 organizations and were published in 9 journals.
45
Lei, Lei, Yaochen Deng, and Dilin Liu. "Research on the learning/teaching of L2 listening: A bibliometric review and its implications." Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 13, no. 4 (2023): 781–810. http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.40216.
Full textAbstract:
This bibliometric study examined the development of research on the learning and teaching of second language (L2) listening from 1948 to 2020 (73 years). Specifically, the study involved: (1) a search and analysis of all the noun phrases to identify important research topics in the abstracts of the published journal articles on L2 listening over the 73 years (divided into three periods) using self-made Python scripts and (2) three co-citation analyses of the references in these articles regarding highly cited authors, publications, and journals, respectively, via the VOSviewer program. The keyword/phrase analysis produced results that helped uncover and delineate the research trends in L2 listening across the three time periods. The co-citation analyses identified the most highly cited authors, publications, and journals as well as the interrelations among the most highly cited items in each of the three categories illustrated with network maps. The results of the analyses and their implications are discussed.
46
Siwach, Anil Kumar, and Seema Parmar. "Research Contributions of CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar : A Bibliometric Analysis." DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology 38, no. 5 (2018): 334. http://dx.doi.org/10.14429/djlit.38.5.13188.
Full textAbstract:
<span>CCS Haryana Agricultural University (CCSHAU) is among the top ten agricultural universities of India according to ICAR ranking 2016-17. The present study has been undertaken to find out the publication trends in this university during 2001-2015. The study mainly focus on year-wise research output, major subject categories, national and international collaborations, top journals for publications, most prolific authors, citations pattern and highly cited papers of CCSHAU. The results indicate that among the top ten agricultural universities of India, CCSHAU stands at fourth position in terms of publications and sixth position in terms of citations. It has collaborated with many institutions at national and international level in its research publications.</span>
47
M., Surulinathi, and Rajalakshmi N. "Bibliometric Analysis : A Study on Highly Cited Papers in Social Sciences in Bharathidasan University, Tamil Nadu." RESEARCH REVIEW International Journal of Multidisciplinary 03, no. 10 (2018): 556–61. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1471743.
Full textAbstract:
Bibliometrics provides powerful tools for the evaluation of scientific research. The application of bibliometric method to research in disciplinary areas in which consensus is reached has become almost routine. Bibliometric studies are used to identify the pattern of publications, authorship, citations and journal coverage with the hope to give an insight into the dynamics of the field under consideration (Warraich, 2011). This study utilizes quantitative analysis and statistics to describe year wise distribution of articles, authorship pattern, and average number of citations per article and so on.
48
Bu, Yi, Ludo Waltman, and Yong Huang. "A multidimensional framework for characterizing the citation impact of scientific publications." Quantitative Science Studies 2, no. 1 (2021): 155–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00109.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract The citation impact of a scientific publication is usually seen as a one-dimensional concept. We introduce a multidimensional framework for characterizing the citation impact of a publication. In addition to the level of citation impact, quantified by the number of citations received by a publication, we also conceptualize and operationalize the depth and breadth and the dependence and independence of the citation impact of a publication. The proposed framework distinguishes between publications that have a deep citation impact, typically in a relatively narrow research area, and publications that have a broad citation impact, probably covering a wider area of research. It also makes a distinction between publications that are strongly dependent on earlier work and publications that make a more independent scientific contribution. We use our multidimensional citation impact framework to report basic descriptive statistics on the citation impact of highly cited publications in all scientific disciplines. In addition, we present a detailed case study focusing on the field of scientometrics. The proposed citation impact framework provides a more in-depth understanding of the citation impact of a publication than a traditional one-dimensional perspective.
49
Turki, Elarjani, Othman T. Almutairi, Alhussinan Modhi, Bafaquh Mohammed, and Abdulrahman Y. Alturki. "A bibliometric analysis on the most-cited publications on carotid endarterectomy throughout history." Journal of Cerebrovascular and Endovascular Neurosurgery 23, no. 4 (2021): 314–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.7461/jcen.2021.e2021.03.010.
Full textAbstract:
Objective: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is the gold standard surgical procedure for managing carotid stenosis due to atherosclerosis and reducing the risk of ischemic stroke. This bibliometric analysis summarizes the most-cited articles on CEA and highlights the contributing articles to today’s evidence-based practice.Methods: A title-specific search using the Scopus database was used to perform the search. Pertinent article-based, journal-based, and author-based parameters were obtained for review.Results: A total of 6,824 articles were published between 1970 and 2020. The top 100 most-cited articles accumulated a total of 54,153 citations with an average citation count (CC) of 541, with only a 4.53% self-citation rate for all authors. The publication trends peaked between 1997 and 2010, in which two-third of the highly cited works were published. The most prolific categories with top citations are the clinical, indications, and management, in a descending order. There were 41 published Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) in the most-cited list.Conclusions: Citation analysis on carotid endarterectomy has witnessed a marked shift in the publication trends from studying the outcome and complications to comparing carotid stenting with endarterectomy. This analysis is a good introductory article to physicians interested in this topic, as it summarizes the highly impactful articles and enlists the most-cited RCT on CEA.
50
Rykova, Valentina, and Maria Voronkova. "Plant flow cytometry: a scientometric analysis of documentary arrays from Scopus and Web of Science databases." BIO Web of Conferences 24 (2020): 00070. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20202400070.
Full textAbstract:
The article presents a scientometric analysis of documentary arrays selected of the world science citation databases Scopus and Web of Science on the topic “Plant flow cytometry”. The analysis of documentary arrays shows their positive dynamics and especially active growth currently. It names countries and organizations actively carrying on research in the area, and leading in the publication amount; rating journals with high publication activity, authors who work productively on the topic. The paper reveals thematic structure of the studied corpus of documents and highly cited publications.