Contents
Academic literature on the topic 'Hilda's C.E'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Hilda's C.E.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Hilda's C.E"
1
Phillips, Ryan D., and Michael Batley. "Evidence for a food-deceptive pollination system using Hylaeus bees in Caladenia hildae (Orchidaceae)." Australian Journal of Botany 68, no. 2 (2020): 146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/bt20002.
Full textAbstract:
Numerous orchid species are pollinated by food deception, where rewardless flowers attract foraging pollinators through the mimicry of other flowers or the use of non-specific floral signals. Here we investigate the pollination of Caladenia hildae, a member of a diverse Australian genus containing species pollinated by sexual deception, and species pollinated by food foraging pollinators. Despite eight bee species occurring at the main study site, only food foraging bees of a single species of Hylaeus (Colletidae) were observed to remove and deposit pollen of C. hildae. Spectral reflectance of C. hildae flowers differed from co-flowering rewarding species in terms of both the wavelengths of light reflected, and the pattern of colouration. As such, there was no evidence that C. hildae uses a pollination strategy based on floral mimicry. However, the attraction of only a single bee species at this site suggests that C. hildae may use a deceptive strategy that exploits sensory biases or behaviours that differ between Hylaeus sp. and the remainder of the bee community. While Hylaeus have been recorded visiting orchid flowers in several parts of the world, C. hildae may represent the first documented case of an orchid species specialised on pollination by Hylaeus bees.
2
N. DA SILVA, LEONARDO, JEFFERY M. SAARELA, PAUL C. SOKOLOFF, LILIANA ESSI, and TATIANA T. DE SOUZA-CHIES. "Chascolytrum serranum (Poaceae: Pooideae: Poeae: Calothecinae), a new microendemic species from Campos de Cima da Serra, southern Brazil." Phytotaxa 435, no. 1 (March 4, 2020): 41–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.435.1.5.
Full textAbstract:
Chascolytrum serranum, a new species of C. sect. Hildaea restricted to Serra Geral National Park and surroundings, in Cambará do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, is described and illustrated. The new species is morphologically similar to C. ambiguum and C. juergensii var. angustilemma, but is distinguished from them mainly by having paleas more than 2/3 the length of the lemmas (up to 2/3 the length of the lemmas in C. ambiguum and C. juergensii var. angustilemma), glabrous and smooth lemmas (strigose in C. juergensii var. angustilemma), and puberulous paleas (glabrous in C. ambiguum). The species can be recognized in the field by the purplish and shiny spikelets. It inhabits river banks and, less frequently, swamps.
3
Chavez, V. M., R. E. Litz, and K. Norstog. "In vitro morphogenesis of Ceratozamia hildae and C. mexicana from megagametophytes and zygotic embryos." Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 30, no. 2 (August 1992): 93–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00034301.
Full text
4
Karlsson, Meriam G. "Leaf Unfolding Rate in Begonia × hiemulis." HortScience 27, no. 2 (February 1992): 109–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.27.2.109.
Full textAbstract:
The rate of leaf unfolding as a function of temperature was determined for Begonia × hiemalis Fotsch under long-day (16 hours of light) conditions before flower initiation. Irradiance was maintained at 280 ± 20 μmol·m–2·s–1 (16.1 mol·m–2·day–l). The two cultivars Hilda and Ballet had similar rates of leaf unfolding in the range from 13 to 28C. The rate increased to a maximum of 0.116 leaves/day at 21C and then decreased at higher temperature. The following quadratic function (where T is the temperature in °C) was selected to describe initial long-day leaf unfolding rate in B. × hiemalis: leaves/day = -0.2083 + 0.03145 × T – 0.0007631 × T2, (r2 = 0.97). The leaf unfolding response to temperature varied for plants of `Hilda' and `Ballet' during short days (10 hours of light) following the initial long-day period. Plants of `Ballet' continued to unfold leaves at a similar rate as under initial long photoperiods, while the leaf unfolding rate for `Hilda' decreased to half the rate observed under long days.
5
Vlahos, J. C. "018 EFFECTS OF ANCYMIDOL, PACLOBUTRAZOL, AND UNICONAZOLE ON GROWTH AND FLOWERING OF ACHIMENES cv HILDA UNDER TWO LIGHT LEVELS." HortScience 29, no. 5 (May 1994): 430b—430. http://dx.doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.29.5.430b.
Full textAbstract:
Plants of Achimenes cv Hilda were treated with foliar sprays of Ancymidol, Paclobutrazol and Uniconazole at 3 different concentrations each, and were placed in a greenhouse at 21°C under 2 light levels (0 and 40% light exclusion) for 12 weeks. Reduced light level decreased plant height, number of axillary shoots and flowers. The three growth retardants in any concentration, supressed development of axillary shoots and flowers. Ancymidol at 25 and 50 mg.1-1, Uniconazole at 5 mg.1-1 and Paclobutrazol at 25, 50 or 100 mg.1-1 decreased plant height and number of leaf whorls. Number of rhizomes was reduced by the 3 chemicals at the highest concentration only. Paclobutrazol was most effective than the other 2 growth retardants. Effects of treatments were more pronounced under shade rather than in full sunlight. Days to anthesis was not affected by any of the treatments except by Paclobutrazol at 100 mg.1-1. The use of these growth retardants in concentration and mode of application similar to those used in this study is not recommended for “Hilda” as height retardation significantly reduces number of flowers
6
Gould, Victor E. "Re: Ortiz-Hildago C, Torres JE. Cytokeratin-positive Interstitial Reticulum Cells in Kikuchi-Fujimoto Disease (Appl Immunohistochem Molecul Morphol 2002;10:194–5)." Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology 10, no. 3 (September 2002): 287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00129039-200209000-00018.
Full text
7
Karlsson, M. G., J. W. Werner, and H. C. H. McIntyre. "TEMPERATURE DURING EARLY DEVELOPMENT AFFECTS PLANT MORPHOLOGY OF BEGONIA × HIEMALIS." HortScience 25, no. 9 (September 1990): 1086f—1086. http://dx.doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.25.9.1086f.
Full textAbstract:
The effect of temperature during the initial long day period on morphology and plant dry weight was determined for Begonia × hiemalis `Hilda'. Multistem cuttings were planted in 10 cm pots and grown at 13°, 16°, 19°, 22°, 25° or 28°C. The day length was 16 hours at an irradiance level of 280 ± 20 μmol·m-2s-1. After 21 days, the plants were moved to a greenhouse maintained at 20° ± 2°C and short days of 10 hours at 125 ± 20 μmol·m-2s-1. The plants were grown under short days for 14 days and then moved to a day length of 16 hours. At data collection 21 days later (56 days from planting), plant height averaged 185 mm for plants initially grown at 13°, 16°, 19° or 22°C while pants originally grown at 25° and 28°C were 40 and 78 mm shorter than plants started at lower temperatures. The mean number of shoots was 4 on plants exposed to 16°, 19°, 22° or 25°C during early development and decrease to 3 shoots for plants grown initially at 13° or 28°C. The average flower number on the main shoot was similar for plants first exposed to low and intermediate temperatures but decreased rapidly to 0 for plants with early exposure to 28°C. Plants in treatments with early temperatures of 19° or 22°C had the largest above ground dry weight at an average 460 mg.
8
Kvaček, Zlatko. "New fossil records of Ceratozamia (Zamiaceae, Cycadales) from the European Oligocene and lower Miocene." Acta Palaeobotanica 54, no. 2 (December 1, 2014): 231–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/acpa-2014-0012.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract New compression leaf material of Ceratozamia (Zamiaceae) has been recognised in the European Cenozoic. A leaflet of Ceratozamia floersheimensis (Engelhardt) Kvaček was recovered among unidentified material from the Oligocene of Trbovlje, former Trifail, Slovenia, housed in old collections of the Austrian Geological Survey, Vienna. It is similar in morphology and epidermal anatomy to other specimens previously studied from the lower Oligocene of Flörsheim, Germany and Budapest, Hungary. A fragmentary leaflet assigned to C. hofmannii Ettingsh. was recovered in the uppermost part of the Most Formation (Most Basin in North Bohemia, Czech Republic) and dated by magnetostratigraphy and cyclostratigraphy to CHRON C5Cn.3n, that is, the latest early Miocene. It yielded excellently preserved epidermal structures, permitting confirmation of the generic affinity and a more precise comparison with this lower Miocene species previously known from Austria (Münzenberg, Leoben Basin) and re-investigated earlier. Both the Oligocene and Miocene populations of Ceratozamia are based on isolated disarticulated leaflets matching some living representatives in the size and slender form of the leaflets. Such ceratozamias thrive today in extratropical areas near the present limits of distribution of the genus along the Sierra Madre Orientale in north-eastern Mexico, in particular C. microstrobila Vovides & J.D. Rees and others of the C. latifolia complex, as well as C. hildae G.P. Landry & M.C. Wilson (“bamboo cycad”). The occurrence of Ceratozamia suggests subtropical to warm-temperate, almost frostless climate and a high amount of precipitation. The accompanied fossil vegetation of both species corresponds well with the temperature regime. While the Oligocene species in Hungary probably thrived under sub-humid conditions, the remaining occurrences of fossil Ceratozamia were connected with humid evergreen to mixed-mesophytic forests.
9
CHISHOLM, LESLIE A., and IAN D. WHITTINGTON. "Review of the Capsalinae (Monogenea: Capsalidae)." Zootaxa 1559, no. 1 (August 24, 2007): 1–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1559.1.1.
Full textAbstract:
The Capsalinae Baird, 1853 (Monogenea: Capsalidae) is revised based on a thorough review of original descriptions and examination of type museum material, where available, to validate species. A total of 262 type and voucher specimens was studied representing apparently 42 of the 60 currently described capsaline species. A combination of characters that should be independent of variation due to specimen preparation techniques was chosen to discriminate species. These characters include the presence/absence of papillae on the ventral surface of the haptor, the presence/absence and the morphology of haptoral accessory sclerites and the presence/absence of dorsomarginal body sclerites and their morphology and distribution. We consider that only 36 of the 60 nominal capsaline species are valid. We could find no support for Caballerocotyla Price, 1960 and therefore we synonymise it with Capsala Bosc, 1811. Under the current concept we recognise 22 species of Capsala, 7 species of Capsaloides Price, 1938, 3 species of Nasicola Yamaguti, 1968 and 4 species of Tristoma Cuvier, 1817. The following Capsala species are considered valid: C. albsmithi (Dollfus, 1962) n. comb.; C. biparasitica (Goto, 1894) Price, 1938; C. caballeroi Winter, 1955; C. foliacea (Goto, 1894) Price, 1938; C. gouri Chauhan, 1951; C. gregalis (Wagner & Carter, 1967) n. comb.; C. interrupta (Monticelli, 1891) Johnston, 1929; C. katsuwoni (Ishii, 1936) Price, 1938; C. laevis (Verrill, 1875) Johnston, 1929; C. maccallumi Price, 1939; C. magronum (Ishii, 1936) Price, 1938; C. manteri Price, 1951; C. manteriaffinis (Mamaev, 1968) n. comb.; C. martinierei Bosc, 1811; C. notosinense (Mamaev, 1968) n. comb.; C. nozawae (Goto, 1894) Price, 1938; C. onchidiocotyle (Setti, 1899) Johnston, 1929; C. ovalis (Goto, 1894) Price, 1938; C. paucispinosa (Mamaev, 1968) n. comb.; C. pelamydis (Taschenberg, 1878) Price, 1938; C. poeyi (Pérez-Vigueras, 1935) Price, 1938; C. pricei Hildago-Escalente, 1950. We consider the following Capsaloides species valid: C. cornutus (Verrill, 1875) Price, 1938; C. cristatus Yamaguti, 1968; C. hoffmannae Lamothe-Argumedo, 1996; C. magnaspinosus Price, 1939; C. nairagi Yamaguti, 1968; C. perugiai (Setti, 1898) Price, 1938; C. sinuatus (Goto, 1894) Price, 1938. The following Nasicola species are deemed valid: N. brasiliensis Kohn, Baptista-Farias, Santos & Gibson, 2004; N. hogansi Wheeler & Beverley-Burton, 1987; N. klawei Stunkard, 1962. Presently, we consider the following Tristoma species valid: T. adcoccineum Yamaguti, 1968; T. adintegrum Yamaguti, 1968; T. coccineum Cuvier, 1817; T. integrum Diesing, 1850. A list of new and re-established synonyms is provided. The status of each species is discussed in detail and a key to all capsaline species that we consider valid is presented. The following 5 capsaline species are considered to be species inquirendae: Caballerocotyla phillippina Velasquez, 1982; Capsala megacotyle (Linstow, 1906) Johnston, 1929; Tristoma fuhrmanni Guiart, 1938; T. levinsenii Monticelli, 1891; T. uncinatum Monticelli, 1889. The importance of careful character selection to discriminate between capsaline species and the need for studies of live parasites to obtain additional characters based on reproductive structures is addressed. Hostspecificity in the Capsalinae is also discussed.
10
Avila Perozo, Elba. "Árbitros Colaboradores." Revista EDUCARE - UPEL-IPB - Segunda Nueva Etapa 2.0 21, no. 3 (May 16, 2018): 96–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.46498/reduipb.v21i3.48.
Full textAbstract:
Dr. Alberto Rodríguez. UPEL-IPBDr. Enrique Reyes. UPEL-IPB Dr. Henry Mujica. UPEL-IPB Dr. Luis Paradas. UPEL-IPB Dr. Manuel Ramírez. UPEL-IPB Dr. Marcos Flores. UPEL-IPB Dra. Adilia Flores. UPEL-IPB Dra. Ana Cecilia Reyes. UPEL-IPB Dra. Ana Hilda Castellón. UPEL-IPB Dra. Any Montero. UPEL-IPB Dra. Francia Becerra. UPEL-IPB Dra. Ismeray Paez.UPEL-IPB Dra. Lexy Mujica.UPEL-IPB Dra. María Lourdes Piñero. UPEL-IPB Dra. Mary Carmen Guedez. UPEL-IPB Dra. Milexa Sequera.PEL-IPB Dra. Yaridem Mendoza. UPEL-IPB Dra. Yarines Perdomo. UPEL-IPB Dra. Zaida Salazar.UPEL-IPB Msc. Patricia Quiroga. UPEL-IPB Prof. José Antonio Ladino. UPEL-IPB Profª. Elvia Monsalve. UPEL-IPB Profª. Francis González. UPEL-IPB Profª. Giuliana Farci.UPEL-IPB Profª. Liliam Alvarado. UPEL-IPB Profª. Adlih C. González. UPEL-IPCProf. Jesús Aranguren. UPEL-IPCProfª. Catalina Betancourt. UPEL-IPCDr. Amilcar Arenas. UPEL-IPMACAROProfª. Ana C. Bolívar. UPEL-IPREMProfª. Zoraida Paredes. UPEL-MARACAYMsc. David González. UCLADr. Wilmer Chávez. UCLADra. Beatriz Veracoechea. UCLADr. José Rafael Prado.ULADra. Dayli Quiva. UNERMBDr. José Ortiz.UC Dra. Omaira Oñate. UCProfª. Rhadis G. de García. UCProfª. Yvel Palacios. UCDr. José A. Sánchez C. UDOLcdo. Samir El Hamra. UCProf. Antonio Vera. Luz-Punto FijoProf. José G. Olivero L. LUZ-Punto FijoProfª. María Carrera. LUZ-Punto FijoProfª. Marimily Segura. Universidad José Antonio PáezDr. Kleeder Bracho. Ministerio del Poder Popular para la EducaciónDr. José de Carvalho. Universidad de San Paulo-BrasilDr. Alejandro Díaz M. Universidad de Concepción -ChileDr. Napoleón Murcia.Universidad de Caldas. Manizales ColombiaDr. Oscar R. Ayala A. Universidad Autónoma Tomás Frías (Potosí, Bolivia)Dr. René Pedroza Flores. Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México (UAEM)Dra. Cristina López. Centro Universitario del Sur Universidad de GuadalajaraDra. Lorena Cruz. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo – ArgentinaDra. María S. Loutayf. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas de la UNAS- ArgentinaDra. Norma I. González A. Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México (UAEM)Ing. Edgar Serna. Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano-Medellín ColombiaLcda. Marjorie Rodríguez. Universidad del Norte. Barranquilla ColombiaLcdo. Luis Humacata.Universidad Nacional de Luján – ArgentinaProf. Carlos M. Tamayo. Universidad Técnica de Ambato. EcuadorProf. Jorge H. Aristizábal Z.Universidad del Quindío. Colombia Prof. Juan Jesús Velasco. Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México (UAEM)Prof. Luis Puga. Universidad Tecnológica Equinoccial- EcuadorDr. Alberto RodríguezDr. Enrique ReyesDr. Henry MujicaDr. Luis ParadasDr. Manuel RamírezDr. Marcos FloresDra. Adilia FloresDra. Ana Cecilia ReyesDra. Ana Hilda CastellónDra. Any MonteroDra. Francia BecerraDra. Ismeray PáezDra. Lexy MujicaDra. María Lourdes PiñeroDra. Mary Carmen GuedezDra. Milexa SequeraDra. Sandra FloresDra. Yaridem MendozaDra. Yarines PerdomoDra. Zaida SalazarMsc. Patricia QuirogaProf. José Antonio LadinoProfª. Elvia MonsalveProfª. Francis GonzálezProfª. GiulianaFarciProfª. Liliam Alvarado
Books on the topic "Hilda's C.E"
1
Austen, Chamberlain. The Austen Chamberlain diary letters: The correspondence of Sir Austen Chamberlain with his sisters Hilda and Ida, 1916-1937. London: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Find full text
2
1953-, Self Robert C., Chamberlain Hilda, Chamberlain Ida, and Royal Historical Society, eds. The Austen Chamberlain diary letters: The correspondence of Sir Austen Chamberlain with his sisters Hilda and Ida, 1916-1937. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press for the Royal Historical Society, 1995.
Find full text
3
D, H. The gift: The complete text. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida, 1998.
Find full text
4
Ellen, Snodgrass Mary. CliffsNotes American Poets of the 20th Century. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2000.
Find full text
5
Augustine, Jane, and H. D. The Gift by H.D.: The Complete Text. University Press of Florida, 1999.
Find full text
6
Ellen, Snodgrass Mary. American Poets of the 20th Century (Cliffs Notes). Cliffs Notes, 2000.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Hilda's C.E"
1
de Oliveira, Maria A. "Virginia Woolf’s Reception and Impact on Brazilian Women’s Literature." In The Edinburgh Companion to Virginia Woolf and Contemporary Global Literature, 246–66. Edinburgh University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474448475.003.0014.
Full textAbstract:
This chapter discusses Woolf’s reception in Brazil as revealed through the work of Brazilian women writers. As a theoretical framework, the chapter relies on a transnational approach including Jessica Berman’s Modernist Commitments: Ethics, Politics and Transnational Modernism; Chandra Talpade Mohanty’s ‘Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourse’, Gayatri C. Spivak’s article ‘Can the subaltern speak?’ and Pelogia Goulimari’s Women Writing Across Cultures. The chapter traces the waves of feminism in Brazil over the decades, examines Woolf’s surge of popularity in Brazil following the publication of Brenda Silver’s Virginia Woolf Icon (1999), and analyses Woolf’s impact on multiple Brazilian women writers: Tetrá de Teffé (1897–1995), Lucia Miguel Pereira (1901–59), Clarice Lispector (1920–77), Carolina Maria de Jesus (1914–77), Ana Cristina Cesar (1952–83), Lygia Fagundes Telles (1923–), Hilda Hilst (1930–2004), Sônia Coutinho (1939–), Adriana Lunardi (1964–), Luiza Lobo (1948–) and Hilda Gouveia de Oliveira (1946–). By the twenty-first century, Woolf’s work has become truly global. Woolf died more than sixty years ago, but her texts are still alive, and she is still moving and inspiring other women writers, to the point that we can talk about a multiplicity of Woolfs.
2
Toumpanakis, Christos, and Martyn Caplin. "Gastrinoma." In Oxford Textbook of Endocrinology and Diabetes, 908–13. Oxford University Press, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199235292.003.0634.
Full textAbstract:
Gastrin is a gastrointestinal hormone, produced predominantly by the G cells of the gastric antrum and duodenum, although small amounts of gastrin have been isolated in the pituitary and some vagal nerve fibres. The biologically active forms of gastrin include carboxy-amidated gastrin-17 and carboxy-amidated gastrin-34, which bind mainly to the cholecystokinin (CCK)-2 receptor. The main role of amidated gastrin is the stimulation of gastric acid secretion by regulation of histamine release from the gastric enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cells, while it may also have a trophic effect on gastric mucosa. There is evidence that the precursor forms of gastrin, such as progastrin and glycine-extended gastrin, are also of biological importance, binding to a separate CCK-C receptor. These precursor may induce cellular and tumour growth and they are implicated in several cancers, such as colon and pancreatic adenocarcinomas. Gastrinomas represent a group of functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours, characterized by autonomous release of gastrin by the tumour cells, which results in symptoms not only due to the tumour growth per se, but also to gastric acid hypersecretion. In 1955, at the annual meeting of American Surgical Association, Robert M. Zollinger and Edwin H. Ellison presented a study entitled Primary Peptic Ulcerations of the Jejunum Associated with Islet Cell Tumour of the Pancreas. They proposed a new clinical syndrome of: (1) ulceration in unusual locations in the upper gastrointestinal tract or recurrent ulcerations; (2) gastric acid hyperseretion; and (3) non-β islet cell tumours of the pancreas. However, the potent gastric secretagogue for the Zollinger–Ellison syndrome was not identified until 1960, when Rodney Gregory and Hilda Tracy of the University of Liverpool discovered that the extract from the pancreas of a patient with Zollinger–Ellison syndrome was the hormone gastrin. Thus, these pancreatic tumours were termed ‘gastrinomas’.