Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Hip arthroplasty revision / Journal articles

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Hip arthroplasty revision.

Journal articles on the topic 'Hip arthroplasty revision'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 3 June 2025

Last updated: 31 July 2025

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Hip arthroplasty revision.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Bautista, Maria, Meilyn Muskus, Daniela Tafur, Guillermo Bonilla, Adolfo Llinás, and Daniel Monsalvo. "Thromboprophylaxis for Hip Revision Arthroplasty: Can We Use the Recommendations for Primary Hip Surgery? A Cohort Study." Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis 25 (January 1, 2019): 107602961882016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1076029618820167.

Full text

Abstract:

The risk of thromboembolic events after hip revision arthroplasty might be higher than in primary hip arthroplasty. However, evidence regarding the use of thromboprophylaxis in revisions is scarce. The purpose of this study is to determine whether thromboprophylaxis recommendations for primary arthroplasty produce similar results in hip revision arthroplasty. This comparative cohort study retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients undergoing primary hip arthroplasty and hip revision surgery between March 2004 and December 2015, who received thromboprophylaxis according to local clinical pra

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Leekha, Surbhi, Priya Sampathkumar, Daniel J. Berry, and Rodney L. Thompson. "Should National Standards for Reporting Surgical Site Infections Distinguish between Primary and Revision Orthopedic Surgeries?" Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 31, no. 05 (2010): 503–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/652156.

Full text

Abstract:

Objective. To compare the surgical site infection (SSI) rate after primary total hip arthroplasty with the SSI rate after revision total hip arthroplasty. Design. Retrospective cohort study. Setting. Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, a referral orthopedic center. Patients. All patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty or revision total hip arthroplasty during the period from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2006. Methods. We obtained data on total hip arthroplasties from a prospectively maintained institutional surgical database. We reviewed data on SSIs collected prospectivel

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Nuzhdin, V. I., V. V. Trotsenko, T. P. Popova, and S. V. Kagramanov. "Revision hip arthroplasty." N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics 8, no. 2 (2022): 66–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.17816/vto98420.

Full text

Abstract:

From 1990 to 2000 238 revision hip joint replacements were performed at Joint Replacement Department of CITO. Both cement and cementless implants as well as in case of need allografts in the form of bone chips and spongeous bone were used. Technique peculiarities of revision operations for Sivash and Compomed implants replacement are described. The working time for Com- pomed implants was detected to be up to 5 у ears, for Gerchev implants up to 7 years and for Sivash implants 10 years and more. In revision replacement the following complications occurred: lethal outcome 2 cases, acute myocard

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Herberts, Peter. "Hip arthroplasty revision." Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 63, no. 2 (1992): 109–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453679209154805.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Thornhill, Thomas S. "REVISION HIP ARTHROPLASTY." Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery 80, no. 9 (1998): 1403. http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199809000-00030.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Raut, V. V., B. M. Wroblewski, and P. D. Siney. "Revision hip arthroplasty." Journal of Arthroplasty 8, no. 4 (1993): 401–3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0883-5403(06)80039-2.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Taylor, James W., and Cecil H. Rorabeck. "Hip Revision Arthroplasty." Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 369 (December 1999): 208–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199912000-00022.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Shubnyakov, Igor I., Aymen Riahi, Alexey O. Denisov, et al. "The Main Trends in Hip Arthroplasty Based on the Data in the Vreden’s Arthroplasty Register from 2007 to 2020." Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia 27, no. 3 (2021): 119–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.21823/2311-2905-2021-27-3-119-142.

Full text

Abstract:

This publication is the official report describing all total hip arthroplasty procedures registered in the database from 01.01.2007 to 31.12.2020. During this period, 74762 operations were performed: 67019 (89.64%) primary and 7743 (10.36%) revision. The proportion of males and females underwent primary arthroplasty was 41.1% and 59.0%, respectively. The age of patients with primary arthroplasty was 57.8 years (95% CI from 57.7 to 57.9), with revision 59.3 years (95% CI from 59.0 to 59.6). The absolute number of primary hip arthroplasty procedures added into the database increased annually fro

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Nikolaev, Nikolay S., Nadezhda N. Pchelova, Elena V. Preobrazhenskaya, Valentina V. Nazarova, and Natal’ya Yu Dobrovol’skaya. "“Unexpected” Infections in Revision Arthroplasty for Aseptic Loosening." Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia 27, no. 3 (2021): 56–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.21823/2311-2905-2021-27-3-56-70.

Full text

Abstract:

Background. Data from the national registers of arthroplasty showed that about 12% of hip and knee arthroplasty undergo revision within 10 years after the primary surgery. The leading cause of hip revisions is aseptic loosening of components, knee joint periprosthetic infection (PPI). Some of the infectious complications, including those related to mechanical causes, remain out of sight. The aim of the study was to identify the frequency of unexpected infections during revision knee and hip arthroplasty performed for aseptic complications of any etiology. Materials and Methods. 839 cases of re

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Bos, Pieter K., Anneke Spekenbrink-Spooren, Peter Croughs, Sita M. A. Bierma-Zeinstra, Max Reijman, and Jakob Van Oldenrijk. "Risk for re-revision and type of antibiotic-loaded bone cement in hip or knee arthroplasty revisions: report of the Dutch Arthroplasty Register." Acta Orthopaedica 94 (September 20, 2023): 471–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.18645.

Full text

Abstract:

Background and purpose: High-dose dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) may reduce the risk of revision after total hip and knee replacements. The aim of our study therefore was to determine the risk of re-revision following first time aseptic hip or knee revision using single versus dual ALBC.Patients and methods: Patients from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register treated from 2007 to 2018 with first time cemented aseptic hip (n = 2,529) or knee revisions (n = 7,124) were incorporated into 2 datasets. The primary endpoint of this observational cohort study was subsequent all-cause re-revision.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Rogers, B. A., A. Sternheim, D. Backstein, O. Safir, and A. E. Gross. "Proximal Femoral Allograft for Major Segmental Femoral Bone Loss: A Systematic Literature Review." Advances in Orthopedics 2011 (2011): 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/257572.

Full text

Abstract:

As the indications for total hip arthroplasty increase, the prevalence of extensive proximal femoral bone loss will increase as a consequence of massive osteolysis, stress shielding and multiple revisions. Proximal femoral bone stock deficiency provides a major challenge for revision hip arthroplasty and is likely to account for a significant future caseload. Various surgical techniques have been advocated included impaction allografting, distal press-fit fixation and massive endoprosthetic reconstruction. This review article provides a systematic review of the current literature to assess the

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Miettinen, S. S. A., T. J. Mäkinen, K. Mäkelä, H. Huhtala, J. S. Kettunen, and V. Remes. "Intraoperative Complications and Mid-Term Follow-Up of Large-Diameter Head Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty and Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty." Scandinavian Journal of Surgery 107, no. 2 (2018): 180–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1457496917748220.

Full text

Abstract:

Background and Aims: Large-diameter head total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing arthroplasty were popular in Finland from 2000 to 2012 for the treatment of hip osteoarthritis. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the mid-term survival of large-diameter head total hip arthroplasty patients operated on in three university hospitals and to compare these results to the survival of hip resurfacing arthroplasty patients. Material and Methods: A total of 3860 hip arthroplasties (3029 large-diameter head total hip arthroplasties in 2734 patients and 831 hip resurfacing arthroplas

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

RYKOV, A. G., V. YU KORSHNYAK, B. V. SCHEBENKOV, S. YU KOJEVNIKOVA, and V. E. VOLOVIK. "Early revisions of endoprothesis after hip joint arthroplasty." Practical medicine 20, no. 4 (2022): 95–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.32000/2072-1757-2022-4-95-97.

Full text

Abstract:

An analysis of 1195 total hip arthroplasties was carried out. Of these, revision operations accounted for 13%. In total, 152 revision surgical interventions were performed in the clinic in 2011–2021, of which early (up to 3 weeks) revisions accounted for 15% of all operations. The main reasons for early revision interventions were: hematomas — 57%, dislocations — 17%, poor wound healing — 9%, limb lengthening — 9%. Most of the early complications require surgical aid, and despite the fact that most surgeons are unhappy about early revisions, they should be performed in due time. The availabili

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Gray, Frank B. "Total Hip Revision Arthroplasty." Orthopedic Clinics of North America 23, no. 2 (1992): 313–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0030-5898(20)31741-7.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Lawrence, Jeffrey M., Charles A. Engh, and Grace E. Macalino. "Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty." Orthopedic Clinics of North America 24, no. 4 (1993): 635–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0030-5898(20)31843-5.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Paprosky, Wayne G., and Scott M. Sporer. "Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty." Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research 417 (December 2003): 203–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000096803.78689.0c.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Elsersawy, Ahmed, Hatem Ahmed, and Hisham Elsedeeq. "REVISION TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY." Zagazig University Medical Journal 19, no. 5 (2013): 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.21608/zumj.2013.4310.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Hanssen, Arlen D. "Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty." Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery 91 (August 2009): 22. http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.i.00362.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Kikukawa, Kenshi, Makio Yamaga, Junji Ide, et al. "Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty." Orthopedics & Traumatology 46, no. 2 (1997): 386–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.5035/nishiseisai.46.386.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Kavanagh, B. F., D. M. Ilstrup, and R. H. Fitzgerald. "Revision total hip arthroplasty." Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery 67, no. 4 (1985): 517–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/00004623-198567040-00003.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Strömberg, Christer N., Peter Herberts, and Bo Palmertz. "Cemented revision hip arthroplasty." Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 63, no. 2 (1992): 111–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453679209154806.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Skinner, Harry B. "Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty." Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume 84, no. 5 (2002): 897. http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200205000-00058.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Crowe, John F., Thomas P. Sculco, and Barbara Kahn. "Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty." Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 413 (August 2003): 175–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000072469.32680.b6.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Barrack, Robert L., J. Thomas McClure, Corey F. Burak, John C. Clohisy, Javad Parvizi, and William Hozack. "Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty." Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 453 (December 2006): 173–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000246537.67500.50.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Drake, Cynthia, Marcia Ace, and Gerhard E. Maale. "Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty." AORN Journal 76, no. 3 (2002): 412–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0001-2092(06)61655-4.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Zmolek, James C., and Lawrence D. Dorr. "Revision total hip arthroplasty." Journal of Arthroplasty 8, no. 4 (1993): 361–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0883-5403(06)80034-3.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

WILSON, PHILIP D. "Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty." Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research &NA;, no. 225 (1987): 218???228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003086-198712000-00018.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Nunn, David. "Revision total hip arthroplasty." Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume 81-B, no. 5 (1999): 936–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.81b5.0810936d.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Hanif, Muhammad, Naveed Arshad, Yasir Habib, et al. "Effect of cementing technique on aseptic stem loosening in cemented primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis." Annals of Medicine & Surgery 85, no. 6 (2023): 2884–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ms9.0000000000000734.

Full text

Abstract:

Background and objective: Aseptic stem loosening after total hip arthroplasty surgery is the commonest complication, whether stem is cemented or uncemented. The aseptic cemented stem loosening has been a challenging problem over the years and a leading cause for revision since the inception of total hip arthroplasty. The objective of systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the impact of cementing technique on aseptic stem loosening in total hip arthroplasty. Methods: Cochrane, CINAHL, Embase, Google scholar, Medline, PubMed were searched in 13 December 2020. Two independent invest

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Agrawal, Alok Chandra, Ankit Kumar Garg, Shivam Chauhan, Jagprit Singh, Harshal Sakale, and Lohitesh Saparey. "Re-revision Following Failed Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in a Case of Neglected Inferior Dislocation of the Hip: An Interesting Case Report." Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports 15, no. 5 (2025): 10–15. https://doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i05.5536.

Full text

Abstract:

Introduction: Revision arthroplasty is challenging, especially in severe acetabular bone loss cases. Metal augments have emerged as a viable option for managing such complex defects. Case Report: We report a case of a 59-year-old male who underwent re-revision arthroplasty using a metal augment for severe acetabular bone loss, restoring limb length and anatomical hip center following a failed revision total hip arthroplasty in a case of neglected inferior hip dislocation. The patient presented with significant pain, instability, and limited mobility. Postoperative outcomes showed considerable

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Kurtinaitis, Jaunius, Narūnas Porvaneckas, Giedrius Kvederas, Tomas Butėnas, and Valentinas Uvarovas. "Revision Rates After Surgical Treatment for Femoral Neck Fractures: Results of 2-Year Follow-up." Medicina 49, no. 3 (2013): 22. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina49030022.

Full text

Abstract:

Background and Objective. Intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck account for a major share of fractures in the elderly. Open reduction and internal fixation has been shown to have a higher rate of revision surgery than arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to assess and compare the rates of revision surgery performed after internal fixation and primary total hip arthroplasty. Material and Methods. Between 2004 and 2006, 681 intracapsular femoral neck fractures in 679 consecutive patients were treated with internal fixation or total hip arthroplasty at our institution. Revision surgery r

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Hanslmeier, Maximilian G., Michael W. Maier, Manuel Feisst, and Nicholas A. Beckmann. "Femoral Head and Liner Exchange in Patients with Atraumatic Dislocation. Results of a Retrospective Study with 6 Years Follow-Up." Medicina 57, no. 11 (2021): 1188. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57111188.

Full text

Abstract:

Background and Objectives: Femoral head and liner exchange is an established treatment for polyethylene wear but has had a more limited role in the treatment of other conditions including dislocation, because of concerns about an increased postoperative dislocation rate. Some authors have considered dislocation associated with polyethylene wear to be a contraindication for this procedure. Materials and Methods: Our retrospective review evaluated the outcome of head and liner exchange in a small consecutively operated heterogeneous cohort of 20 patients who presented with dislocation unrelated

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Jämsä, Pyry, Aleksi Reito, Niku Oksala, Antti Eskelinen, and Esa Jämsen. "Does chronic kidney disease affect implant survival after primary hip and knee arthroplasty?" Bone & Joint Journal 103-B, no. 4 (2021): 689–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.103b4.bjj-2020-0715.r2.

Full text

Abstract:

Aims To investigate whether chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with the risk of all-cause revision or revision due to a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after primary hip or knee arthroplasty. Methods This retrospective cohort study comprised 18,979 consecutive hip and knee arthroplasties from a single high-volume academic hospital. At a median of 5.6 years (interquartile range (IQR) 3.5 to 8.1), all deaths and revisions were counted. To overcome the competing risk of death, competing risk analysis using the cumulative incidence function (CIF) was applied to analyze the association

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Tabutin, Jacques, and Pier M. Cambas. "Hip Arthroplasty up to the Age of 30 and Considerations in Relation to Subsequent Revision." HIP International 19, no. 3 (2009): 201–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/112070000901900302.

Full text

Abstract:

We reviewed a series of 17 hip arthroplasties in 16 patients performed when the patients were 30 years old or younger who presented to us for consideration of revision. The mean age was 23.1 years (14 to 30) at the initial arthroplasty. At the time of the original procedure there were 4 sequelae of septic arthritis, 7 old traumatic hip injures, 3 cases of developmental dysplasia (DDH), 1 case of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 1 steroid-induced avascular necrosis, and 1 old slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE) The implants inculded 11 total hip arthroplasties (THA), 3 double cup arthroplasties, 1

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

El-Husseiny, M., B. Masri, C. Duncan, and D. S. Garbuz. "Long-term results of tripolar constrained total hip arthroplasty in revision hip arthroplasty." Bone & Joint Journal 101-B, no. 6_Supple_B (2019): 123–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.101b6.bjj-2018-1484.r1.

Full text

Abstract:

AimsWe investigated the long-term performance of the Tripolar Trident acetabular component used for recurrent dislocation in revision total hip arthroplasty. We assessed: 1) rate of re-dislocation; 2) incidence of complications requiring re-operation; and 3) Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) pain and functional scores.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively identified 111 patients who had 113 revision tripolar constrained liners between 1994 and 2008. All patients had undergone revision hip arthroplasty before the constrained liner was used: 13 after the fir

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Alfaro-Adrian, J., R. W. Crawford, A. Wulke, D. W. Murray, and P. Mclardy-Smith. "Proximal Cementing for Revision Hip Arthroplasty." HIP International 8, no. 2 (1998): 62–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/112070009800800201.

Full text

Abstract:

We report the results of a new technique of proximal cement fixation in 41 patients having revision hip arthroplasty using the Oxford modular femoral component. This consists of two parts, a metaphised wedge and a stem. The metaphyseal wedge is cemented and applies the load proximally to encourage bone healing. The wedge is free to slide on an uncemented stem that gains fixation distal to areas of bone loss, with the intention of reducing the risk of fracture. The clinical and radiographic follow-up ranged from a minimum of 3 years to 7 years. There have been no re-revisions. Ninety percent of

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Lindberg-Larsen, Martin, Pelle Baggesgaard Petersen, Yasemin Corap, Kirill Gromov, Christoffer Calov Jørgensen, and Henrik Kehlet. "Fast-track revision hip arthroplasty: a multicenter cohort study on 1,345 elective aseptic major component revision hip arthroplasties." Acta Orthopaedica 93 (February 23, 2022): 341–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2022.2196.

Full text

Abstract:

Background and purpose: Data on application of fasttrack/enhanced recovery protocols in revision hip arthroplasty (R-THA) surgery is scarce. We report length of stay (LOS), risk of LOS > 5 days, and readmission ≤ 90 days after revision hip arthroplasty in centers with a well-established fast-track protocol in both primary and revision procedures. Patients and methods: This is an observational cohort study from the Centre for Fast-track Hip and Knee Replacement and the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Consecutive elective aseptic major component revision hip arthroplasties from 6 dedicated

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Electricwala, Ali J., Derek F. Amanatullah, Rapeepat I. Narkbunnam, James I. Huddleston, William J. Maloney, and Stuart B. Goodman. "Comprehensive Operative Note Templates for Primary and Revision Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty." Open Orthopaedics Journal 10, no. 1 (2016): 725–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001610010725.

Full text

Abstract:

Background: Adequate preoperative planning is the first and most crucial step in the successful completion of a revision total joint arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the availability, adequacy and accuracy of operative notes of primary surgeries in patients requiring subsequent revision and to construct comprehensive templates of minimum necessary information required in the operative notes to further simplify re-operations, if they should become necessary. Methods: The operative notes of 144 patients (80 revision THA’s and 64 revision TKA’s) who underwent revision total

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Ho-Man, Truong Phu, and Thanh Long Nguyen. "Revision hip replacement by minimally invasive technique with anterior approach: three case study." Romanian Journal of Medical Practice 19, no. 3 (2024): 291–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.37897/rjmp.2024.3.13.

Full text

Abstract:

Revision total hip arthroplasty is becoming more and more popular, the surgical approach can vary based on anatomy, patient position, experience, and surgeon habits. The posterior incision is often chosen by surgeons while the current literature has very few articles related to revision total hip arthroplasty using anterior incision. In this paper, we present 3 clinical cases revision total hip arthroplasty using minimally invasive anterior incision technique for the 3 patients who had been treated the primary total hip replacement combined with the disaster complications to emphasize the feas

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Goveia, Vania Regina, Isabel Yovana Quispe Mendoza, Bráulio Roberto Gonçalves Marinho Couto, et al. "Profile of hip arthroplasty patients in a teaching hospital." Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões 42, no. 2 (2015): 106–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-69912015002007.

Full text

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: to characterize the epidemiological profile of patients undergoing hip replacement, primary or revisional. METHODS: we conducted a retrospective, descriptive study, including hip arthroplasties performed from January 2009 to June 2012 in a Belo Horizonte teaching hospital, Minas Gerais State - MG, Brazil. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: orthopedic procedures represented 45% of the operations at the hospital in the period, 1.4% hip arthroplasties. There were 125 hip replacements, 85 total, 27 partial and 13 reviews. Among the patients, 40% were male and 60%

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Kaminskiy, A. V., L. O. Marchenkova, and A. V. Pozdnyakov. "Revision Hip Arthroplasty: Epidemiology, Causes, Risk Factors (foreign literature review)." Vestnik travmatologii i ortopedii imeni N.N. Priorova, no. 2 (June 30, 2015): 83–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.32414/0869-8678-2015-2-83-89.

Full text

Abstract:

Publications related to revision hip arthroplasty were analyzed. Data of National Registers from different countries were presented, problems of epidemiology and prognostication of need in revision arthroplasty were highlighted, the causes (demographic, clinical, surgical, rehabilitation) and the most significant risk factors that conditioned the failure of primary hip arthroplasty were described.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Kaminskiy, A. V., L. O. Marchenkova, and A. V. Pozdnyakov. "Revision Hip Arthroplasty: Epidemiology, Causes, Risk Factors (foreign literature review)." N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics 22, no. 2 (2015): 83–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.17816/vto201522283-89.

Full text

Abstract:

Publications related to revision hip arthroplasty were analyzed. Data of National Registers from different countries were presented, problems of epidemiology and prognostication of need in revision arthroplasty were highlighted, the causes (demographic, clinical, surgical, rehabilitation) and the most significant risk factors that conditioned the failure of primary hip arthroplasty were described.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Schwarzkopf, Ran. "Conversion total hip arthroplasty: Primary or revision total hip arthroplasty." World Journal of Orthopedics 6, no. 10 (2015): 750. http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v6.i10.750.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Klein, Gregg R., Javad Parvizi, Shani Shastri, Harrison G. Frank, Peter F. Sharkey, and William J. Hozack. "Simultaneous Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty and Contralateral Revision Hip Arthroplasty." Journal of Arthroplasty 21, no. 4 (2006): 527–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2005.12.011.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Worth, LJ, AL Bull, and MJ Richards. "Reporting Surgical Site Infections Following Primary and Revision Hip Arthroplasty— One Size Does Not Fit All." Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 32, no. 3 (2011): 296–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/658912.

Full text

Abstract:

The risk of surgical site infection (SSI) is greater after revision hip arthroplasty than after primary procedures. While this is accepted as a clinical phenomenon, standardized surveillance strategies for healthcare-associated infections, including SSIs, do not currently take this into consideration. Most notably, the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) risk index for stratification does not differentiate between primary and revision surgeries. Using data from a single US center, Leekha et al. recently demonstrated that the risk for SSI was almost twice as high after revision t

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Patetta, Michael J., Erdan Kayupov, Joseph A. Karam, and Samuel J. Chmell. "Fourth-Generation Ceramic Head Fracture in Dual Mobility Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Case Report." Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports 12, no. 1 (2022): 98–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2022.v12.i01.2638.

Full text

Abstract:

Introduction: Rare cases of Biolox® delta ceramic head fractures in ceramic-on-polyethylene bearings have been reported in the literature. Virtually none of these catastrophic injuries have been documented in dual mobility constructs. Case Report:We report a case of fourth-generation delta ceramic head fracture 4.5 years after implantation in a dual mobility total hip replacement constructs as a result of a ground-level fall. The patient underwent revision arthroplasty with another delta ceramic dual mobility construct and was able to return to work in custodial services 2 weeks after the revi

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Etoh, Masao, Daishiro Yugue, Toshihiro Fukazawa, Hiroshi Mimura, Youji Maehara, and Kanji Akiyama. "Revision of total hip arthroplasty." Orthopedics & Traumatology 36, no. 2 (1987): 545–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.5035/nishiseisai.36.545.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Frankel, Andrew, and William Hozack. "Ultrasound for revision hip arthroplasty." Current Opinion in Orthopaedics 4, no. 1 (1993): 43–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001433-199302000-00009.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Tofighi, Medhi, and Stephen A. Jones. "(ii) Planning revision hip arthroplasty." Orthopaedics and Trauma 29, no. 2 (2015): 86–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mporth.2014.12.006.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Behairy, Yaser, Russell D. Meldrum, and William H. Harris. "Hybrid revision total hip arthroplasty." Journal of Arthroplasty 16, no. 7 (2001): 829–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/arth.2001.24950.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!