Academic literature on the topic 'Hitler, Adolf, 1889-1945 - Fiction'

Karakter pemimpin pada kisah Nabi Musa AS mencakup sejumlah karakter utama, seperti sabar, visioner, kompeten, integritas, pembaharu, solutif, religius, kredibel, cerdas, pandai bekerja sama, memiliki tekad yang kuat, informan, pembelajar dan tawadhu’. Penelitian ini memiliki perbedaan pendapat dengan: 1) Niccolo Machiavelli (L. 1469 M) yang memisahkan antara etika dan politik dalam melaksanakan dan menerapkan nilai-nilai kepemimpinannya. Pemerintah sebagai pemangku institusi kepemimpinan nasional harus menjalankan tugas-tugas negara dengan baik sesuai dengan nilai-nilai kepribadian bangsa sebagaimana yang tertuang dalam Undang-undang Dasar (UUD) 1945 dan Pancasila, 2) Alexander Agung (L. 340 SM) yang berambisius menumpuk harta kekayaan, bertindak brutal, memerintahkan pengikutnya untuk menyembah dirinya dan tidak segan-segan membantai siapa saja yang menentang kekuasaannya. Pemerintah dan semua pemangku jabatan sejatinya hidup dengan karakter kesederhanaan, santun terhadap rakyatnya dan siap mengakomodir aspirasi mereka seluas-luasnya ketika tidak sejalan dengan kebijakannya, 3) Adolf Hitler (L. 1889 M) yang menggunakan cara-cara militeristik seperti menjalankan dua fungsi; militer dan non-militer dalam menjalankan tampuk kepemimpinannya sehingga menyebabkan kurangnya trust masyarakat dan membawa negara Jerman ke jurang instabilitas nasionalnya. Pemerintah dan elemen masyarakat dalam mengemban tugasnya harus menjalankan prinsip penguatan nilai-nilai karakter pemimpin dan berusaha sekuat mungkin memegang prinsip ini sesuai dengan amanah yang diemban agar tercipta kualitas kepribadian anak bangsa yang bisa membawah negara ini ke arah perubahan yang lebih baik ke depannya.

Made available in DSpace on 2014-06-11T19:23:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2012-09-05Bitstream added on 2014-06-13T18:50:53Z : No. of bitstreams: 1 oliveira_rc_me_arafcl_parcial.pdf: 129881 bytes, checksum: 25c60896b9f252bf8d39104cf28d44ce (MD5) Bitstreams deleted on 2015-07-02T12:36:02Z: oliveira_rc_me_arafcl_parcial.pdf,. Added 1 bitstream(s) on 2015-07-02T12:37:27Z : No. of bitstreams: 1 000703015_20250219.pdf: 119841 bytes, checksum: 686c14c50ae36d3932da3114f8f10a53 (MD5)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
A presente pesquisa busca através do discurso e do projeto político nazista compreender as origens do pensamento conservador contemporâneo e as formas modernas de discriminação e violência, sobretudo as que são decorrentes da ideia de ordem e controle social, assim também como a relação entre o pensamento conservador e a sociedade de massas na crise da modernidade. Definimos nosso objeto em torno da análise do período que abarca do final da Primeira Guerra Mundial, até a expansão e chegada ao poder do Partido Nazista, na década de 1930. Tendo como objeto central a obra Mein Kampf de Adolf Hitler, analisaremos como diferentes ideologias concorreram para a criação de uma doutrina, e o papel do antissemitismo nesse processo. Remontamos as origens de diferentes discursos na sociedade alemã, e como esses discursos convergiram em um projeto político. Objetivamos compreender tanto o poder que a articulação de ideias pode ter dentro de um determinado contexto social, quanto as relações entre ideologia e sociedade. Analisamos as formas que o pensamento conservador assume para o reestabelecimento da ordem e do controle social e em última análise compreender como é possível “naturalizar” as diferenças e as práticas discriminatórias, num processo em que o outro é sub-humanizado, subalternizado, e que se legitimam a segregação, a violência e o extermínio
This research aims through political discourse and the Nazi project to understand the origins of contemporary conservative thought and modern forms of discrimination and violence, especially those arising from the idea of order and control partner, so as the relationship between conservative thought and mass society in the crisis of modernity. We define our object of analysis around the period spanning the end of World War I, to the expansion and rise to power of the Nazi Party in the 1930s. Taking as its central object the work of Adolf Hitler's Mein Kampf, consider how different ideologies contributed to the creation of a doctrine, and the role of anti-Semitism in this process. Reassemble the origins of different discourses in society, and how these discourses have converged on a political project. We aim to understand both the power of articulation of ideas can have within a given social context and the relationship between ideology and society. We analyzed the ways in which conservative thought takes for re-establishment of order and social control and ultimately understand how it is possible to naturalize the differences and discriminatory practices, a process in which the other is subhumanized, subordinazed, e its legitimized segregation, violence and the slaughter

The rationale for this study is Albert Speer's unique value as a source of information concerning the Third Reich and Adolf Hitler. Although there is a wealth of information available on Nazi Germany and Hitler, the observations of this intelligent man who was an important official of the regime and a close associate of Hitler himself carry weight that no other report can match. He was a well-educated, intellectual, and articulate man who left behind three comprehensive books and many articles and interviews. In addition to such publications, there are, in the National Archives in Washington, D.C., many records of interviews with Speer conducted by Allied personnel immediately following the war. Those documents have been used extensively in this study.There is no attempt either to indict or to vindicate Speer, as many authors have done, but rather the purpose is to present in narrative form an analytical study of the relationship between the two men. The central focus throughout examines Speer and Hitler in juxtaposition and forms conclusions on the nature of their complex and compelling attachment. In the process, historical events form the backdrop as Speer describes them for us. It is always Speer, not Hitler, with whom the primary interest lies.The question of how anyone of Speer's background and intelligence could have given his life to a regime devoted to gutter politics, conquest of a continent, and genocide always arises in any study of Speer. The strange hold the Nazis exert on the world's imagination seems to ebb and flow, but does not die out, nor does the awful suspicion that something similar could happen again. Speer used his writings to describe the process and warn against its resurrection, especially in light of the tremendous leap in technology we have seen. Do not look for monsters, he counseled, for monsters are easily identified and avoided. Beware the manipulators who orchestrate on a national scale those policies which bring harm to whole populations, men who loudly proclaim their humanness and ordinariness.This inquiry is not an attempt to prove a predetermined hypothesis, since it embodies a historical approach rather than an experimental one. Information is drawn from the books and papers of Speer, as well as official documents, but secondary works to corroborate the basic sources are cited at times. There is still no definitive biography of Speer, although he appears as a central figure in many works. Perhaps one of the reasons for this is that the Speer family has put his personal papers in Heidelberg beyond the reach of anyone until 1999, probably as a result of his negative treatment in various publications.The technical papers from the Ministry of Armaments and War Production are housed in the Bundesarchiv at Koblenz, but were not pertinent to this study. The Institut fur Zeitgeschichte in Munich houses official papers, as does the Berlin Document Center, while the Washington has the transcripts of Library of Congress in Hitler's Table Talks, some parts of which are used in this study. Speer's books and published material give an extensive look at his part in the Third Reich, his relationship with Hitler, and his own feelings and observations concerning both. The International Military Tribunal records from Nuremberg are both extensive and enlightening. One may also view the collection of Heinrich Hoffmann, Hitler's personal photographer, in the Special Collections section at Bracken Library.Chapter I deals with Speer in the pre-war years as he rose to fame and became part of Hitler's inner circle, while Chapter II views the war years through Speer's experiences. In Chapter III the early relationship between Speer and Hitler is developed, and in Chapter IV the war, the collapse of the Third Reich, and the attendant disasters are covered.

Hitler claimed to have studied Clausewitz and Machiavelli, but violated the tenets of both by permitting ideology to override strategy. Hitler's ideology is revealed from documentary sources: Mein Kampf, his speeches, and Tischreden (table talks.) Operation Sea Lion, the planned 1940 invasion of England, was cancelled because the Fuhrer regarded the British as nordic cousins. Operation Citadel, the 1943 Battle of Kursk, was conceived because he decided the racially inferior Slav must be subdued. Doomed from the outset, Hitler nevertheless launched Citadel and squandered most of Germany's remaining armor and elite troops. A general staff officer is interviewed as witness to the period. His background, training, and opinions of the Fuhrer are presented. Thesis conclusion: flawed ideology brought disastrous decisions.

This item is only available in print in the UCF Libraries. If this is your Honors Thesis, you can help us make it available online for use by researchers around the world by following the instructions on the distribution consent form at http://library.ucf.edu/Systems/DigitalInitiatives/DigitalCollections/InternetDistributionConsentAgreementForm.pdf You may also contact the project coordinator, Kerri Bottorff, at kerri.bottorff@ucf.edu for more information.
Bachelors
Office of Undergraduate Studies
Liberal Studies

Aux lendemains de la défaite allemande de 1918, Adolf Hitler, le caporal défait de la Première Guerre mondiale, psychiquement en guerre depuis de longues années, écoute attentivement ce qui, dans l'histoire du peuple allemand, sa langue et sa culture, maintient ses espoirs et ses craintes. Au XIXe siècle, le mythe 'völkisch' - l'idéologie du 'Volk' allemand- avait structuré l'identité des Allemands. La défaite allemande de 1918 sonnait la fin de ce mythe, laissant la jeune Allemagne auparavant si sûre de son destin exceptionnel, totalement humiliée. Dans cet 'Umwelt' déboussolée, Adolf Hitler, l'autodidacte de Braunau, aussitôt propulsé sur la scène politique bavaroise, glanait rancoeurs et inquiétudes sociales pour se constituer un discours. La langue qu'il était en train de fabriquer, bientôt fixée définitivement dans 'Mein Kampf', était une langue totalitaire et meurtrière. Totalitaire, en prétendant tout dire et répondre à toutes les inquiétudes d'une époque ; meurtrière par !'opérateur sémantique qui liait dans un même énoncé « Deutschland erwache » à sa haine antisémite «Juda verrecke ». Adolf Hitler fut l'homme d'une seule idée: une lutte mortelle entre Aryens et Juifs était engagée depuis des siècles. De l'issue de cette lutte dépendait le sort du peuple allemand. La victoire du peuple juif signerait l'anéantissement de la race aryenne et plus globalement du monde entier. Pour que le peuple allemand vive, il n'y avait d'autre solution que celle du 'Juda verrecke'. La langue qu'il avait fabriquée ne fut qu'un habillage de son délire paranoïaque, le moyen de propagande le plus puissant qui ait soutenu, pendant presque douze années, les illusions les plus mensongères. La néo-réalité nazie créait les conditions nécessaires pour qu'un peuple se tourne entièrement vers son mythe, renversant en terreur l'autre face qui n'était que ravissement. Face à la mystification du 'Deutsch/anderwache' doublée de l'entreprise meurtrière du 'Juda verrecke', la majorité du peuple allemand avait succombé
The days following the german defeat of 1918, Adolf Hitler, the defeated caporal from the First World War, psychologically at war for long many years, is carefully listening what, in the german people History, its language and its culture, holds his hopes and his fears together. During the 19th century, the ideology from the german « Volk », the« völkisch » myth, had structured the gerrnan identity.The gerrnan defeat of 1918 called this myth to an end, leaving this young Germany wich before was so sure about it special destiny, totally humiliated. In this totally lost « Umwelt », Adolf Hitler, Braunau's autodidact, was immediatly propelled on the bavarish politic scène, catching every resentment and social anxiety to build himself a speach. The language wich he was building, soon definitively fixed in « Mein Kampf », was a totalitarian and murderous language.Totalitarian, pretending to say everything, to answer to all periods of anxiety .Murderous, by the semantic operator wich bound in one speach « Deutschland erwache » to his antisemite hatred « Judverrecke ». Adolf Hitler was a one idea's man : a deadly fight between Aryans and Jews had been settled for centuries. From the result of this fight was depending the fate of the german people. The jewish victory would give the destruction of the aryan's race and most likely the destruction from the whole world

Cette étude comprend l'analyse et le commentaire de quelques cent-trente-cinq caricatures qui ont pour but de tenter de répondre à la question sur l'éventualité d'une reconstitution historique au travers des caricatures antihitlériennes de la presse satirique de la République de Weimar. Elles illustrent la montée du national-socialisme, du moins par le biais de la critique, puis de l'opposition et de la révolte, que ce dernier a pu susciter au cours des années 1923-1933. Ce travail a nécessité la recherche de faits politiques précis auxquels chaque caricature faisait référence et la comparaison de la représentation proposée par la caricature avec les informations et les jugements donnés rétrospectivement par les historiens. Ce jeu de va-et-vient entre le document-source et l'arrière-plan référentiel a aidé à proposer une estimation de l'écho suscité ou non par l'événement politique en question. Ce choix de caricatures a permis par exemple de voir quelles avaient été les apparitions de Hitler sur la scène politique qui avaient le plus déchaîné les passions. Toutefois il reste difficile de concevoir une histoire de la montée du national-socialisme et de l'opposition à Hitler avant 1933 à partir des seules caricatures.

The functioning and apparent successes of the political leadership in Nazi Germany, has for long presented political scientists with a very complex and seemingly ambiguous system to interpret and explain. This study addresses this very matter by firstly identifying the ideological environment within which it functioned as one in which an effective leader with effective leadership tactics was vital. Secondly, two factors are identified as key to the understanding and explanation of political leadership in the Third Reich. These factors are the 'Hitler myth' as a vibrant leadership cult that stood at the centre of Adolf Hitler's relationship with the German people and thus formed the base of Hitler's authority, and the 'Fahrer Prinzip' as expression of the totalitarian style of leadership present in the Nazi movement and the Nazi State, especially regarding the role of Hitler as Fahrer of the Nazi Party and later also of the Nazi State.
Dissertation (MA (Political Science))--University of Pretoria, 2007.
Political Sciences
unrestricted