Academic literature on the topic '"Hudson", Expédition de l', 1970'

The northernmost porcupine (Erethizon dorsatum L.) populations in the western part of northern Quebec are found at tree line along the Hudson Bay coast. A dendrochronological analysis of feeding scars produced during the dormant period indicates that this species expanded significantly during the 20th century, particularly during the last 25 years. Confined to small, marginal forest sites during the 19th century, porcupine range increased afterwards and climaxed during the 1960's and 1970's with the occupance of remote altitudinal tundra sites. This change in porcupine range coincides with the area where white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) expanded during the last 100 years because of climatic warming. It is hypothesized that porcupine populations responded to climate change with a time lag of several decades associated with forest-niche building.

Erratum. In the paper "An Alternative Synthesis of Clindamicin" by K. Bowden and G.P. Stevens published in J. Serb. Chem. Soc. 65(10)(2000) 691-694 the end of the References on page 694 is omitted during the printing process. The page 694 should read: 7. D. Brett, I. M. Downie, J. B. Lee, J. Org. Chem. 32 (1967) 855 8. R. D. Birkenmeyer, U. S. Patent 3,475,407, Oct 28, 1969 (C. A. 73 (1970) 25835w) 9. D. R. Hepburn, H. R. Hudson, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 (1976) 754 10. R. M. Magid, O. S. Fruchey, W. L. Johnson, T. G. Allen, J. Org. Chem. 44 (1979) 359; R. M. Magid, B. G. Talley, S. K. Souther, J. Org. Chem. 46 (1981) 824. <br><br><font color="red"><b> Link to the corrected article <u><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/JSC0010691B">10.2298/JSC0010691B</a></b></u>

В статье рассматриваются вопросы датировки Остолоповского селища в Республике Татарстан. Селище располагалось в центральной части Волжской Булгарии и было связано с крупными городами этого государства. С 1955 г. оно разрушается Куйбышевским водохранилищем. Селище исследовалось в 1969 г. казанским археологом Т.А. Хлебниковой. Она считала, что селище возникло в Х в., возможно, в конце IX в. и существовало до XII в. В 1991 г. Е.П. Казаков высказал мнение, что это селище возникло не ранее второй половины Х в. Задача данной статьи – сделать заключение о времени возникновения этого селища. Для этого был использованы артефакты, собранные с 1980-х гг. и до 2000-х гг. из разрушенного культурного слоя, а также из раскопок на селище, которые проводил в 1997–2017 гг. К.А. Руденко. Были изучены предметы нескольких категорий. Это изделия из стекла, камня, железа и цветных металлов. Интересны стеклянные бусы, изготовленные на Ближнем Востоке, которые были распространены в Волжской Булгарии в XI–XII вв. Очень редкими являются находки на селище стеклянного перстня и браслета, датированные XI в., которые были изготовлены в Византии, миниатюрной подвески из лазурита этого же времени, а также фрагментов стеклянной лампы и парфюмерного стеклянного флакона, изготовленных в Сирии или Египте в XI–XII вв. Выявлены предметы, связанные с населением Прикамья – древними марийцами и удмуртами. Это предметы личной гигиены и украшения. Также были найдены арабские монеты Бувейхидов, выпущенных в конце Х – начале XI в. Кроме этого, найдено большое количество железных артефактов, связанных с аскизской археологической культурой Южной Сибири. Они датируются второй половиной XI в. – первой половиной XII в. Таким образом, анализ артефактов показал, что Остолоповское селище возникло не ранее конца Х в. Активно развивалось оно в XI – начале XII в. Библиографические ссылки Артамонова О.А. Могильник Саркела – Белой Вежи // Труды Волго-Донской археологической экспедиции. Том III / МИА. № 109 /Отв. ред. М.И. Артамонов. М.; Л.: Изд-во АН СССР, 1963. С. 5−215. Археологические памятники Центрального Закамья / Отв. ред. А.Х. Халиков. Казань: ИЯЛИ КФАН СССР, 1988. 98 с. Архипов Г.А. Марийцы XII–XIII вв. (к этнокультурной истории Поветлужья). Йошкар-Ола: Марийское книжное издательство, 1986. 115 с. Беговатов Е.А., Полубояринова М.Д. Восточные стеклянные лампы из Поволжья // РA. 2014. №1. С. 158–162. Белавин А.М., Крыласова Н.Б. Огурдинский могильник. Пермь: ПГГПУ, 2012. 259 с. Гайнуллин И.И., Дёмина Ю.В., Усманов Б.М. Опыт применения ГИС-технологий для оценки интенсивности разрушения археологических памятников в зоне влияния Куйбышевского водохранилища // КСИА. 2012. Вып. 226. С. 54−63. Голдина Е.В. Бусы могильников неволинской культуры (конец IV–IX вв.) // МИКВАЭ. Т. 6. Ижевск: Удмуртский государственный университет, 2010. 264 с. Голдина Р.Д., Королева О.П. Бусы средневековых могильников Верхнего Прикамья // Этнические процессы на Урале и в Сибири в первобытную эпоху / Отв. ред. В.Е. Владыкин. Ижевск: Удм. ун-т, 1983. С. 40–72. Доброва О.П. Стеклянные бусы Гнёздово по материалам раскопок Центрального городища // Гнёздовский археологический сборник. Материалы и исследования. Вып. 1 / Труды ГИМ. Вып. 210 / Отв. ред. С.Ю. Каинов. М.: ГИМ, 2018. С. 102−126. Журухина Е.Ю. Украшения из стекла: тенденции и проблемы исследования находок Киевского Подола // Стекло Восточной Европы с древности до начала ХХ века / Отв. ред. П.Г. Гайдуков, сост. Е.К. Столярова. М.: Нестор-История, 2015. С. 218−222. Захаров С.Д. Древнерусский город Белоозеро. М.: Индрик, 2004. 592 с. Иванова М.Г. Иднакар: Древнеудмуртское городище IX–XIII вв.: Монография. Ижевск: УИИЯЛ УрО РАН, 1998. 294 с. Иванова М.Г., Куликов К.И. Древнее искусство Удмуртии. Ижевск: УдмИИЯЛ УрО РАН, 2000. 216 с. Казаков Е.П. Булгарское село X–XIII веков низовий Камы. Казань: Татар. кн. изд-во, 1991. 176 с. Казаков Е.П. Об этнокультурных компонентах народов юго-восточной Европы в Волжской Болгарии (по археологическим материалам) // ТА. 1997. №1. С. 61–77. Крыласова Н.Б. Археология повседневности: материальная культура средневекового Предуралья. Пермь: ПГПУ, 2006. 352 с. Кызласов И.Л. Аскизская культура Южной Сибири X–XIV вв. // САИ. Вып. Е3-18. М.: Наука, 1983. 128 с. Леонтьев А.Е. Археология мери. К предыстории Северо-Восточной Руси. М.: Геоэко, 1996. 341 с. Мурашева В.В., Довгалюк Н.П., Фетисов А.А. Византийские импорты с территории пойменной части Гнездовского поселения // «Краеугольный камень». Археология, история, искусство, культура России и сопредельных стран. Т. 1 / Ред. Е.Н. Носов, С.В. Белецкий. СПб: Ломоносовъ, 2010. С. 512–536. Нигамаев А.З. Болгарские города Предкамья: Алабуга, Кирмень, Чаллы: Своеобразие материальной культуры населения. Казань: Изд-во Казанск. ун-та, 2005. 228 с. Никитина Т.Б. Погребальные памятники IX–XI вв. Ветлужско-Вятского междуречья // Археология Евразийских степей. Вып. 14. Казань: Отечество, 2012. 408 с. Полубояринова М.Д. Украшения из цветных камней Болгара и Золотой Орды. М.: ИА АН СССР, 1991. 112 с. Путешествие ибн Фадлана: Волжский путь от Багдада до Булгара. Каталог выставки. М.: Издательский дом Марджани, 2016. 560 с. Руденко К.А. Тюркский мир и Волго-Камье в XI–XIV вв.: Изделия аскизского круга в Среднем Поволжье. Казань: Заман, 2001. 256 с. Руденко К.А. Волжская Булгария в системе торговых путей средневековья (по материалам раскопок Речного (Остолоповского) селища в Алексеевском районе Татарстана) // Великий Волжский путь: история формирования и развития. Материалы круглого стола / Отв. ред. М.А. Усманов Часть II, Казань: ИИ АН РТ, 2002. С. 31−52. Руденко К.А. О некоторых итогах исследования Остолоповского селища в Алексеевском районе Республики Татарстан // Поволжская археология. 2012. №2. С. 123 – 145. Руденко К.А. Украшения из лазурита XI - XIII вв. из Волжской Булгарии и древности Сибири // Древности Сибири и Центральной Азии. 2014. № 7(19). С. 224−244. Руденко К.А. О защитном вооружении булгарского воина XI в. (по материалам булгарского селища (Остолоповского) у с. Речное) // Военная археология. Вып.3 / Отв. ред. О.В. Двуреченский. М.; Тула: МедиаМир; Куликово поле, 2014а. С. 47−54. Руденко К.А. Исследования VI Алексеевского и Мурзихинского селищ в Татарстане в 1992–1996 г. Казань: Издательский дом «Казанская недвижимость», 2015. 400 с. Руденко К.А. Стратиграфия Остолоповского селища XI – XII вв. в Алексеевском районе Татарстана // Археология Евразийских степей. 2017. №1. С. 296–319. Руденко К.А. Новые данные о булгарских жилищах домонгольского времени (по материалам Остолоповского селища в Татарстане // Археология Евразийских степей. 2019. №6. С. 95−110 https://doi.org/10.244.11/2587-6112-2019-00082. Седова М.В. Ювелирные изделия древнего Новгорода (Х−XV вв.). М.: Наука, 1981. 196 с. Старая Ладога − древняя столица Руси. Каталог выставки / Науч. ред. Б.С. Короткевич. СПб.: Изд-во ГЭ, 2003. 190 с. Старостин П.Н. Раннее поселение на правом берегу Малого Иерусалимского оврага в Болгарах // Археология Волжской Булгарии: проблемы, поиски, решения / Отв. ред. Ф.Ш. Хузин. Казань: ИЯЛИ КФАН СССР, 1993. С. 53–63. Столярова Е.К. Стеклянные украшения булгарских селищ низовий Камы // Древности Поволжья: эпоха средневековья (исследования культурного наследия Волжской Булгарии и Золотой Орды) / Отв. ред. К.А. Руденко. Казань: Школа, 2005. С. 43–66. Столярова Е.К. Стеклянный сосуд из раскопок Остолоповского селища // Материалы Лихачевских чтений Национального музея РТ. Казань: ООО ИПЦ «Экспресс-формат», 2008. С. 272–277. Фехнер М.В. Предметы косторезного производства // Ярославское Поволжье X–XI вв. по материалам Тимеревского, Михайловского и Петровского могильников / Отв. ред. А.П. Смирнов.М.: ГИМ, 1963. С. 39–42. Хлебникова Т.А. Отчет о работах Отряда археологической экспедиции по исследованию болгарских поселений зоны Куйбышевского водохранилища в 1969 году. Казань, 1970 г. / Архив ИА РАН. Р-I. №3919. 75 л. Хлебникова Т.А. Некоторые итоги исследования булгарских памятников нижнего Прикамья // СА. 1974. № 1. С. 58–68. Хлебникова Т.А., Казаков Е.П. К археологической карте ранней Волжской Болгарии на территории ТАССР // Из археологии Волго-Камья / Отв. ред. А.Х. Халиков. Казань: ИЯЛИ КФАН СССР, 1976. С. 109–136. Энговатова А.В., Коваль В.Ю., Зоц Е.П., Столярова Е.К., Сарачева Т.Г. Мякининские курганы. Мякининский археологический комплекс в Подмосковье / Материалы спасательных археологических исследований. Т. 21. М.: ИА РАН, 2018. 344 с. Carboni S. Glass from Islamic Lands. The al-Sabah Collection, Dar al-Athar al-Islamiyyah, Kuwait National Museum. L.: Thames & Hudson, 2001. 416 p. Carboni S., Waitehouse D. Glass of the Sultans. N.-Y.: Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2002. 330 p. Kröger Jens Nishapur. Glass of th Early Islamic Period. N.-Y.: Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1995. 258 p.

The globe is engulfed by one of the most extensive public health crises as COVID-19 has become a leading cause of death worldwide. COVID-19 was first detected in Wuhan, China, in December 2019, causing the severe acute respiratory syndrome. This review discusses issues related to Covid-19 vaccines, such as vaccine development targets, vaccine types, efficacy, limitations and development prospects. Keywords: Covid-19, SARS-CoV-2, vaccine, spike protein. References [1] C. Wang, P. W. Horby, F. G. Hayden, G. F. Gao, A Novel Coronavirus Outbreak of Global Health Concern, The Lancet, Vol. 395, No. 10223, 2020, pp. 470-473, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30185-9.[2] T. Singhal, A Review of Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19), The Indian Journal of Pediatrics, Vol. 87, 2020, pp. 281-286, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-020-03263-6.[3] World Health Organization, WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard, https://covid19.who.int/, (accessed on: August 21st, 2021).[4] A. Alimolaie, A Review of Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19), Biological Science Promotion Vol. 3, No. 6, 2020, pp. 152-157.[5] J. Yang, Y. Zheng, X. Gou, K. Pu, Z. Chen, Q. Guo et al., Prevalence of Comorbidities and Its Effects in Patients Infected with SARS-Cov-2: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, International Journal of Infectious Diseases, Vol. 94, 2020, pp. 91-95, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.03.017.[6] H. E. Randolph, L. B. Barreiro, Herd Immunity: Understanding COVID-19, Immunity, Vol. 52, No. 5, 2020, pp. 737-741, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2020.04.012.[7] F. Jung, V. Krieger, F. Hufert, J. H. Küpper, Herd Immunity or Suppression Strategy to Combat COVID-19, Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation, Vol. 75, No. 1, 2020, pp. 13-17, https://doi.org/10.3233/CH-209006.[8] O. Sharma, A. A. Sultan, H. Ding, C. R. Triggle, A Review of the Progress and Challenges of Developing a Vaccine for COVID-19, Frontiers in Immunology, Vol. 11, No. 2413, 2020, pp. 1-17, https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.585354.[9] G. D. Sempowski, K. O. Saunders, P. Acharya, K. J. Wiehe, B. F. Haynes, Pandemic preparedness: Developing Vaccines and Therapeutic Antibodies for COVID-19, Cell, Vol. 181, No. 7, 2020, pp. 1458-1463, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.05. 041.[10] A. J. R. Morales, J. A. C. Ospina, E. G. Ocampo, R. V. Peña, Y. H. Rivera, J. P. E. Antezana et al., Clinical, Laboratory and Imaging Features of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease, Vol. 34, 2020, pp. 101-623, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101623.[11] C. Huang, Y. Wang, X. Li, L. Ren, J. Zhao, Y. Hu et al., Clinical Features of Patients Infected with 2019 Novel Coronavirus in Wuhan, China, The Lancet, Vol. 395, No. 10223, 2020, pp. 497-506, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5.[12] R. Lu, X. Zhao, J. Li, P. Niu, B. Yang, H. Wu et al., Genomic Characterisation and Epidemiology of 2019 Novel Coronavirus: Implications for Virus Origins and Receptor Binding, The Lancet, Vol. 395, No. 10224, 2020, pp. 565-574, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30251-8.[13] L. Chen, W. Liu, Q. Zhang, K. Xu, G. Ye, W. Wu et al., RNA Based mNGS Approach Identifies a Novel Human Coronavirus From Two Individual Pneumonia Cases in 2019 Wuhan Outbreak, Emerging Microbes & Infections, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2020, pp. 313-319, https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2020.1725399.[14] Y. Chen, Q. Liu, D. Guo, Emerging Coronaviruses: Genome Structure, Replication, and Pathogenesis, Journal of Medical Virology, Vol. 92, No. 4, 2020, pp. 418-423, https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25681.[15] D. R. Beniac, A. Andonov, E. Grudeski, T. F. Booth, Architecture of The SARS Coronavirus Prefusion Spike, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, Vol. 13, No. 8, 2006, pp. 751-752, https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb1123.[16] B. W. Neuman, G. Kiss, A. H. Kunding, D. Bhella, M. F. Baksh, S. Connelly et al., A Structural Analysis of M Protein in Coronavirus Assembly and Morphology, Journal of Structural Biology, Vol. 174, No. 1, 2011, pp. 11-22, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2010.11.021.[17] J. L. N. Torres, M. L. DeDiego, C. V. Báguena, J. M. J. Guardeño, J. A. R. Nava, R. F. Delgado et al., Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Envelope Protein Ion Channel Activity Promotes Virus Fitness and Pathogenesis, Plos Pathogens Vol. 10, No. 5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004077.[18] A. R. Fehr, S. Perlman. Coronaviruses: An Overview of Their Replication and Pathogenesis. Coronaviruses, New York, 2015, pp. 1-23.[19] M. Letko, A. Marzi, V. Munster, Functional Assessment of Cell Entry and Receptor Usage for SARS-CoV-2 and Other Lineage B Betacoronaviruses,. Nature Microbiology, Vol. 5, No. 4, 2020, pp. 562-569, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-020-0688-y.[20] A. Grifoni, D. Weiskopf, S. I. Ramirez, J. Mateus, J. M. Dan, C. R. Moderbacher et al., Targets of T Cell Responses to SARS-Cov-2 Coronavirus in Humans With COVID-19 Disease and Unexposed Individuals, Cell, Vol. 181, No. 7, 2020, pp. 1489-1501, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.015.[21] M. Leslie, T Cells Found in Coronavirus Patients Bode Well for Long-Term Immunity, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Vol. 368, No. 6493, 2020, pp. 809-810, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.368.6493.809.[22] N. L. Bert, A. T. Tan, K. Kunasegaran, C. Y. Tham, M. Hafezi, A. Chia et al., SARS-CoV-2-specific T Cell Immunity in Cases of COVID-19 and SARS, and Uninfected Controls, Nature, Vol. 584, No. 7821, 2020, pp. 457-462, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2550-z .[23] E. R. Adams, M. Ainsworth, R. Anand, M. I. Andersson, K. Auckland, J. K. Baillie et al., Antibody Testing for COVID-19: A Report from the National COVID Scientific Advisory Panel, Wellcome Open Research, Vol. 5, 2020, pp. 139-156, https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15927.1.[24] N. Vabret, G. J. Britton, C. Gruber, S. Hegde, J. Kim, M. Kuksin et al., Immunology of COVID-19: current state of the science, Immunity. Vol. 52, No. 6, 2020, pp. 910-941, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2020.05.002[25] W. Liu, A. Fontanet, P. H. Zhang, L. Zhan, Z. T. Xin, L. Baril et al., Two-Year Prospective Study of The Humoral Immune Response of Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Vol. 193, No. 6, 2006, pp. 792-795, https://doi.org/10.1086/500469.[26] E. Callaway, Coronavirus Vaccines Leap Through Safety Trials-But Which Will Work is Anybody's Guess, Nature, Vol. 583, No. 7818, 2020, pp. 669-671, https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-02174-y.[27] Y. Dong, T. Dai, Y. Wei, L. Zhang, M. Zheng, F. Zhou. A Systematic Review of SARS-Cov-2 Vaccine Candidates, Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2020, pp. 1-14, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-020-00352-y. [28] E. P. Regalado, Vaccines for SARS-CoV-2: Lessons from Other Coronavirus Strains. Infectious Diseases and Therapy, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2020, pp. 255-274, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-020-00300-x.[29] Y. Cai, J. Zhang, T. Xiao, H. Peng, S. M. Sterling, R. M. Walsh et al., Distinct Conformational States of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein, Science, Vol. 369, No. 6511, 2020, pp. 1586-1592, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abd4251.[30] M. S. Suthar, M. G. Zimmerman, R. C. Kauffman, G. Mantus, S. L. Linderman, W. H. Hudson et al., Rapid Generation of Neutralizing Antibody Responses in COVID-19 Patients, Cell Reports Medicine, Vol. 1, No. 3, 2020, pp. 100040-100047, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrm.2020.100040.[31] Q. Gao, L. Bao, H. Mao, L. Wang, K. Xu, M. Yang et al., Development of an Inactivated Vaccine Candidate for SARS-CoV-2, Science, Vol. 36, No. 6499, 2020, pp. 77-81, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abc1932.[32] L. Ni, F. Ye, M. L. Cheng, Y. Feng, Y. Q. Deng, H. Zhao et al., Detection of SARS-CoV-2-specific Humoral and Cellular Immunity in COVID-19 Convalescent Individuals, Immunity, Vol. 52, No. 6, 2020, pp. 971-977, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2020.04.023.[33] B. D. Quinlan, H. Mou, L. Zhang, Y. Guo, W. He, A. Ojha et al., The SARS-CoV-2 Receptor-binding Domain Elicits a Potent Neutralizing Response Without Antibody-dependent Enhancement, Available at SSRN, Vol. 3575134, 2020, pp. 1-24, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3575134.[34] D. B. Melo, B. E. N. Payant, W. C. Liu, S. Uhl, D. Hoagland, R. Moller et al., Imbalanced Host Responseto SARS-Cov-2 Drives Development of COVID-19, Cell, Vol. 181, No. 5, 2020, pp. 1036-1045, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.026.[35] J. Hadjadj, N. Yatim, L. Barnabei, A. Corneau, J. Boussier, N. Smith et al., Impaired Type I Interferon Activity and Inflammatory Responses in Severe COVID-19 Patients, Science, Vol. 36, No. 6504, 2020, pp. 718-724, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abc6027.[36] H. Pang, Y. Liu, X. Han, Y. Xu, F. Jiang, D. Wu et al., Protective Humoral Responses to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-associated Coronavirus: Implications for the Design of an Effective Protein-based Vaccine, Journal of General Virology, Vol. 85, No. 10, 2004, pp. 3109-3113, https://doi.org/10.1099/vir.0.80111-0.[37] Y. Li, R. Tenchov, J. Smoot, C. Liu, S. Watkins, Q. Zhou, A Comprehensive Review of The Global Efforts on COVID-19 Vaccine Development, ACS Central Science , Vol. 7, No. 4, 2021, pp. 512-533, https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.1c00120.[38] J. A. Wolff, R. W. Malone, P. Williams, W. Chong, G. Acsadi, A. Jani et al., Direct Gene Transfer Into Mouse Muscle in Vivo, Science, Vol. 247, No. 4949, 1990, pp. 1465-1468,. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1690918.[39] M. Ingolotti, O. Kawalekar, D. J. Shedlock, K. Muthumani, D. B. Weiner, DNA Vaccines for Targeting Bacterial Infections, Expert Review of Vaccines, Vol. 9, No. 7, 2010, pp. 747-763, https://doi.org/10.1586/erv.10.57.[40] S. Jones, K. Evans, H. M. Johnn, M. Sharpe, J. Oxford, R. L. Williams et al., DNA Vaccination Protects Against an Influenza Challenge in A Double-Blind Randomised Placebo-Controlled Phase 1b Clinical Trial, Vaccine, Vol. 27, No. 18, 2009, pp. 2506-2512, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.02.061.[41] J. Kim, INOVIO Doses First Subject in Phase 2 Segment of its INNOVATE Phase 2/3 Clinical Trial for INO-4800, its DNA Medicine to Prevent COVID-19, Cision PR Newswire: News Distribution, Targeting and Monitoring Home, https://www.prnewswire.com/newsreleases/inovio-doses-first-subject-in-phase-2-segment-of-its-innovate-phase-23-clinical-trial-for-ino-4800-its-dna-medicine-to-prevent-covid-19-301187002.html/, 2020, (accessed on: December 7th, 2020).[42] P. Tebas, S. Yang, J. D. Boyer, E. L. Reuschel, A. Patel, A. C. Quick et al., Safety and Immunogenicity of INO-4800 DNA Vaccine Against SARS-Cov-2: A Preliminary Report of an Open-Label, Phase 1 Clinical Trial, EClinical Medicine, Vol. 31, No. 1000689, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100689.[43] T. Schlake, A. Thess, M. F. Mleczek, K. J. Kallen. Developing mRNA-vaccine Technologies, RNA Biology, Vol. 9, No. 11, 2012, pp. 1319-1330, https://doi.org/10.4161/rna.22269.[44] K. J. Hassett, K. E. Benenato, E. Jacquinet, A. Lee, A. Woods, O. Yuzhakov et al., Optimization of lipid Nanoparticles for Intramuscular Administration of mRNA Vaccines, Molecular Therapy-Nucleic Acids, Vol. 15, 2019, pp. 1-11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omtn.2019.01.013.[45] A. Bashirullah, R. L. Cooperstock, H. D. Lipshitz, Spatial and Temporal Control of RNA Stability, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 98, No. 13, 2001, pp. 7025-7028. [46] K. Kariko, H. Muramatsu, J. Ludwig, D. Weissman, Generating the Optimal mRNA for Therapy: HPLC Purification Eliminates Immune Activation and Improves Translation of Nucleoside-Modified, Protein-Encoding mRNA, Nucleic Acids Research, Vol. 39, No. 21, 2011, pp. 142-152, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr695.[47] N. Pardi, M. J. Hogan, M. S. Naradikian, K. Parkhouse, D. W. Cain, L. Jones et al., Nucleoside-Modified mRNA Vaccines Induce Potent T Follicular Helper and Germinal Center B Cell Responses, Journal of Experimental Medicine, Vol. 215, No. 6, 2018, pp. 1571-1588, https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20171450.[48] L. A. Jackson, E. J. Anderson, N. G. Rouphael, P. C. Roberts, M. Makhene, R. N. Coler et al., An mRNA Vaccine Against SARS-CoV-2-Preliminary Report, New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 383, No. 20, 2020, pp. 1920-1931, https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2022483.[49] K. S. Corbett, D. K. Edwards, S. R. Leist, O. M. Abiona, S. B. Barnum, R. A. Gillespie et al., SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine Design Enabled by Prototype Pathogen Preparedness, Nature, Vol. 586, No. 7830, 2020, pp. 567-571, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2622-0.[50] K. S. Corbett, B. Flynn, K. E. Foulds, J. R. Francica, S. B. Barnum, A. P. Werner et al., Evaluation of the mRNA-1273 Vaccine Against SARS-CoV-2 in Nonhuman Primates, New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 383, No. 16, 2020, pp. 1544-1555, https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2024671.[51] E. E. Walsh, R. Frenck, A. R. Falsey, N. Kitchin, J. Absalon, A. Gurtman et al., RNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccine BNT162b2 Selected for a Pivotal Efficacy Study, Medrxiv, Vol. 2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.17.20176651.[52] M. J. Mulligan, K. E. Lyke, N. Kitchin, J. Absalon, A. Gurtman, S. Lockhart et al., Phase 1/2 Study to Describe the Safety and Immunogenicity of a COVID-19 RNA Vaccine Candidate (BNT162b1) in Adults 18 to 55 Years of Age: Interim Report, Medrxiv, Vol. 586, 2020, pp. 589-593, https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2028436.[53] E. J. Anderson, N. G. Rouphael, A. T. Widge, L. A. Jackson, P. C. Roberts, M. Makhene et al., Safety and Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-1273 Vaccine in Older Adults, New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 383, No. 25, 2020, pp. 2427-2438, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2639-4.[54] P. F. McKay, K. Hu, A. K. Blakney, K. Samnuan, J. C. Brown, R. Penn et al., Self-amplifying RNA SARS-CoV-2 Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Candidate Induces High Neutralizing Antibody Titers in Mice, Nature Communications, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2020, pp. 1-7, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17409-9.[55] J. H. Erasmus, A. P. Khandhar, A. C. Walls, E. A. Hemann, M. A. O’Connor, P. Murapa et al., Single-dose Replicating RNA vaccine Induces Neutralizing Antibodies Against SARS-CoV-2 in Nonhuman Primates, BioRxiv, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.28.121640.[56] R. D. Alwis, E. S. Gan, S. Chen, Y. S. Leong, H. C. Tan, S. L. Zhang et al., A Single Dose of Self-Transcribing and Replicating RNA-based SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Produces Protective Adaptive Immunity in Mice, Molecular Therapy, Vol. 29, No. 6, 2021, pp. 1970-1983, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2021.04.001.[57] M. R. Guroff, Replicating and Non-Replicating Viral Vectors for Vaccine Development, Current Opinion in Biotechnology, Vol. 18, No. 6, 2007, pp. 546-556, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2007.10.010.[58] K. Benihoud, P. Yeh, M. Perricaudet, Adenovirus Vectors for Gene Delivery, Current Opinion in Biotechnology, Vol. 10, No. 5,1999, pp. 440-447, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0958-1669(99)00007-5.[59] Z. Xiang, G. Gao, A. R. Sandoval, C. J. Cohen, Y. Li, J. M. Bergelson et al., Novel, Chimpanzee Serotype 68-Based Adenoviral Vaccine Carrier for Induction of Antibodies to A Transgene Product, Journal of Virology, Vol. 76, No. 6, 2002, pp. 2667-2675, https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.76.6.2667-2675.2002.[60] F. C. Zhu, X. H. Guan, Y. H. Li, J. Y. Huang, T. Jiang, L. H. Hou et al., Immunogenicity and Safety Of A Recombinant Adenovirus Type-5-Vectored COVID-19 Vaccine in Healthy Adults Aged 18 Years or Older: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2 Trial, The Lancet, Vol. 396, No. 10249, 2020, pp. 479-488, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31605-6.[61] F. C. Zhu, Y. H. Li, X. H. Guan, L. H. Hou, W. J. Wang, J. X. Li et al., Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of A Recombinant Adenovirus Type-5 Vectored COVID-19 Vaccine: A Dose-Escalation, Open-Label, Non-Randomised, First-in-Human Trial, The Lancet. Vol. 395, No. 10240, 2020, pp. 1845-1854.[62] S. Wu, G. Zhong, J. Zhang, L. Shuai, Z. Zhang, Z. Wen, et al. A Single Dose of An Adenovirus-Vectored Vaccine Provides Protection Against SARS-Cov-2 Challenge, Nature Communications Vol. 1, No. 11, 2020, pp. 1-7, https://doi.org/10.1016/s41467-020-17972-1.[63] P. M. Folegatti, K. J. Ewer, P. K. Aley, B. Angus, S. Becker, S. B. Rammerstorfer et al., Safety and Immunogenicity of The Chadox1 Ncov-19 Vaccine Against SARS-Cov-2: A Preliminary Report of A Phase 1/2, Single-Blind, Randomised Controlled Trial, The Lancet, Vol. 396, No. 10249, 2020, pp. 467-478, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31604-4.[64] N. V. Doremalen, T. Lambe, A. Spencer, S. B. Rammerstorfer, J. N. Purushotham, J. R. Port et al., ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccine Prevents SARS-Cov-2 Pneumonia in Rhesus Macaques, Nature, Vol. 586, No. 7830, 2020, pp. 578-582, https://doi.org/10.1016/s41586-020-2608-y.[65] D. Y. Logunov, I. V. Dolzhikova, O. V. Zubkova, A. I. Tukhvatullin, D. V. Shcheblyakov, A. S. Dzharullaeva et al., Safety and Immunogenicity of an Rad26 And Rad5 Vector-Based Heterologous Prime-Boost COVID-19 Vaccine in Two Formulations: Two Open, Non-Randomised Phase 1/2 Studies From Russia, The Lancet, Vol. 396, No. 10255, 2020, pp. 887-897, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31866-3.[66] S. Y. Jung, K. W. Kang, E. Y. Lee, D. W. Seo, H. L. Kim, H. Kim et al., Heterologous Prime-Boost Vaccination with Adenoviral Vector and Protein Nanoparticles Induces Both Th1 and Th2 Responses Against Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus, Vaccine, Vol. 36, No. 24, 2018, pp. 3468-3476, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.04.082.[67] S. Lu, Heterologous Prime-Boost Vaccination. Current Opinion in Immunology, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2009, pp. 346-351, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coi.2009.05.016.[68] D. Y. Logunov, I. V. Dolzhikova, D. V. Shcheblyakov, A. I. Tukhvatulin, O. V. Zubkova, A. S. Dzharullaeva et al., Safety and Efficacy of an Rad26 and Rad5 Vector-Based Heterologous Prime-Boost COVID-19 Vaccine: an Interim Analysis of A Randomised Controlled Phase 3 Trial in Russia, The Lancet, Vol. 397, No. 10275, 2021, pp. 671-681, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00234-8.[69] T. Ura, K. Okuda, M. Shimada. Developments in Viral Vector-Based Vaccines, Vaccines, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2014, pp. 624-641, https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines2030624.[70] B. E. Bache, M. P. Grobusch, S. T. Agnandji. Safety, Immunogenicity and Risk-Benefit Analysis of Rvsv-ΔG-ZEBOV-GP (V920) Ebola Vaccine in Phase I-III Clinical Trials Across Regions. Future Microbiology, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2020, pp. 85-106, https://doi.org/10.2217/fmb-2019-0237.[71] Ebola Vaccines, NIH: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Logo, 2020, https://www.niaid.nih.gov/diseases-conditions/ebola-vaccines/, (accessed on: January 9th, 2020).[72] F. Krammer, SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in Development, Nature, Vol. 586, No. 7830, 2020, pp. 516-527, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2798-3.[73] Y. Zhang, G. Zeng, H. Pan, C. Li, Y. Hu, K. Chu et al., Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of an Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Healthy Adults Aged 18-59 Years: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 1/2 Clinical Trial, The Lancet Infectious Diseases, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2021, pp. 181-192, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30843-4.[74] Sinovac Announces Phase III Results of Its COVID-19 Vaccine, Sinovac, 2021. https://www.businessswwire.com/news/home/20210205005496/en/Sinovac-Announces-Phase-III-Results-of-Its-COVID-19-Vaccine/, 2021, (accessed on: February 5th,2021).[75] Sinovac Receives Conditional Marketing Authorization in China for its COVID-19 Vaccine. Sinovac, https://www.businessswwire.com/news/ home/20210208005305/en/Sinovac-Receives-Conditional-Marketing-Authorization-in-China-for-its-COVID-19-Vaccin/, 2021, (accessed on: February 8th, 2021).[76] L. M. Rossen, A. M. Branum, F. B. Ahmad, P. Sutton, R. N. Anderson, Excess Deaths Associated with COVID-19, by Age and Race and Ethnicity-United States, January 26-October 3, 2020, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, Vol. 69, No. 42, 2020, pp. 1522-1527.[77] China Grants Conditional Market Approval for Sinopharm CNBG’s COVID-19 Vaccine. Sinopharm, http://www.sinopharm.com/en/s/1395-4173-38862.html/, 2021, (accessed on: January 2nd, 2021).[78] V. A. Fulginiti, J. J. Eller, A. W. Downie, C. H. Kempe, Altered Reactivity to Measles Virus: Atypical Measles in Children Previously Immunized with Inactivated Measles Virus Vaccines, Jama, Vol. 202, No. 12, 1967, pp. 1075-1080, https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1967.03130250057008.[79] H. W. Kim, J. G. Canchola, C. D. Brandt, G. Pyles, R. M. Chanock, K. Jensen et al., Respiratory Syncytial Virus Disease in Infants Despite Prior Administration of Antigenic Inactivated Vaccine. American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 89, No. 4, 1969, pp. 422-434, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a120955.[80] Novavax Confirms High Levels of Efficacy Against Original and Variant COVID-19 Strains in United Kingdom and South Africa Trials, Novavax 2021, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/novavax-confirms-high-levels-of-efficacy-against-original-and-variant-covid-19-strains-in-united-kingdom-and-south-africa-trials-301246019.html/, (accessed on: March 11th, 2021).[81] Our Vaccine, Covaxx, 2020, https://www.gavi.org/covax-vaccine-roll-out/, (accessed on: August 14th, 2021).[82] M. O. Mohsen, G. Augusto, M. F. Bachmann, The 3Ds in Virus‐like Particle Based‐vaccines: Design, Delivery and Dynamics, Immunological Reviews Vol. 296, No. 1, 2020, pp. 155-168, https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12863.

“...children’s play seems to become more and more a product of the educational and cultural orientation of parents...” — Stephen Kline, The Making of Children’s Culture We live in a world saturated by design and through design artefacts, one can glean unique insights into a culture's values and norms. In fact, some academics, such as British media and film theorist Ben Highmore, see the two areas so inextricably intertwined as to suggest a wholesale “re-branding of the cultural sciences as design studies” (14). Too often, however, everyday objects are marginalised or overlooked as objects of scholarly attention. The field of material culture studies seeks to change that by focussing on the quotidian object and its ability to reveal much about the time, place, and culture in which it was designed and used. This article takes on one such object, a mid-century children's toy tea set, whose humble journey from 1968 Sears catalogue to 2014 thrift shop—and subsequently this author’s basement—reveals complex rhetorical messages communicated both visually and verbally. As material culture studies theorist Jules Prown notes, the field’s foundation is laid upon the understanding “that objects made ... by man reflect, consciously or unconsciously, directly or indirectly, the beliefs of individuals who made, commissioned, purchased or used them, and by extension the beliefs of the larger society to which they belonged” (1-2). In this case, the objects’ material and aesthetic characteristics can be shown to reflect some of the pervasive stereotypes and gender roles of the mid-century and trace some of the prevailing tastes of the American middle class of that era, or perhaps more accurately the type of design that came to represent good taste and a modern aesthetic for that audience. A wealth of research exists on the function of toys and play in learning about the world and even the role of toy selection in early sex-typing, socialisation, and personal identity of children (Teglasi). This particular research area isn’t the focus of this article; however, one aspect that is directly relevant and will be addressed is the notion of adult role-playing among children and the role of toys in communicating certain adult practices or values to the child—what sociologist David Oswell calls “the dedifferentiation of childhood and adulthood” (200). Neither is the focus of this article the practice nor indeed the ethicality of marketing to children. Relevant to this particular example I suggest, is as a product utilising messaging aimed not at children but at adults, appealing to certain parents’ interest in nurturing within their child a perceived era and class-appropriate sense of taste. This was fuelled in large part by the curatorial pursuits of the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) in New York, coupled with an interest and investment in raising their children in a design-forward household and a desire for toys that reflected that priority; in essence, parents wishing to raise modern children. Following Prown’s model of material culture analysis, the tea set is examined in three stages, through description, deduction and speculation with each stage building on the previous one. Figure 1: Porcelain Toy Tea Set. Description The tea set consists of twenty-six pieces that allows service for six. Six cups, saucers, and plates; a tall carafe with spout, handle and lid; a smaller vessel with a spout and handle; a small round bowl with a lid; a larger oval bowl with a lid, and a coordinated oval platter. The cups are just under two inches tall and two inches in diameter. The largest piece, the platter is roughly six inches by four inches. The pieces are made of a ceramic material white in colour and glossy in texture and are very lightweight. The rim or edge of each piece is decorated with a motif of three straight lines in two different shades of blue and in different thicknesses, interspersed with a set of three black wiggly lines. Figure 2: Porcelain Toy Tea Set Box. The set is packaged for retail purposes and the original box appears to be fully intact. The packaging of an object carries artefactual evidence just as important as what it contains that falls into the category of a “‘para-artefact’ … paraphernalia that accompanies the product (labels, packaging, instructions etc.), all of which contribute to a product’s discourse” (Folkmann and Jensen 83). The graphics on the box are colourful, featuring similar shades of teal blue as found on the objects, with the addition of orange and a silver sticker featuring the logo of the American retailer Sears. The cover features an illustration of the objects on an orange tabletop. The most prominent text that confirms that the toy is a “Porcelain Toy Tea Set” is in an organic, almost psychedelic style that mimics both popular graphics of this era—especially album art and concert posters—as well as the organic curves of steam that emanate from the illustrated teapot’s spout. Additional messages appear on the box, in particular “Contemporary DESIGN” and “handsome, clean-line styling for modern little hostesses”. Along the edges of the box lid, a detail of the decorative motif is reproduced somewhat abstracted from what actually appears on the ceramic objects. Figure 3: Sears’s Christmas Wishbook Catalogue, page 574 (1968). Sears, Roebuck and Co. (Sears) is well-known for its over one-hundred-year history of producing printed merchandise catalogues. The catalogue is another important para-artefact to consider in analysing the objects. The tea set first appeared in the 1968 Sears Christmas Wishbook. There is no date or copyright on the box, so only its inclusion in the catalogue allows the set to be accurately dated. It also allows us to understand how the set was originally marketed. Deduction In the deduction phase, we focus on the sensory aesthetic and functional interactive qualities of the various components of the set. In terms of its function, it is critical that we situate the objects in their original use context, play. The light weight of the objects and thinness of the ceramic material lends the objects a delicate, if not fragile, feeling which indicates that this set is not for rough use. Toy historian Lorraine May Punchard differentiates between toy tea sets “meant to be used by little girls, having parties for their friends and practising the social graces of the times” and smaller sets or doll dishes “made for little girls to have parties with their dolls, or for their dolls to have parties among themselves” (7). Similar sets sold by Sears feature images of girls using the sets with both human playmates and dolls. The quantity allowing service for six invites multiple users to join the party. The packaging makes clear that these toy tea sets were intended for imaginary play only, rendering them non-functional through an all-capitals caution declaiming “IMPORTANT: Do not use near heat”. The walls and handles of the cups are so thin one can imagine that they would quickly become dangerous if filled with a hot liquid. Nevertheless, the lid of the oval bowl has a tan stain or watermark which suggests actual use. The box is broken up by pink cardboard partitions dividing it into segments sized for each item in the set. Interestingly even the small squares of unfinished corrugated cardboard used as cushioning between each stacked plate have survived. The evidence of careful re-packing indicates that great care was taken in keeping the objects safe. It may suggest that even though the set was used, the children or perhaps the parents, considered the set as something to care for and conserve for the future. Flaws in the glaze and applique of the design motif can be found on several pieces in the set and offer some insight as to the technique used in producing these items. Errors such as the design being perfectly evenly spaced but crooked in its alignment to the rim, or pieces of the design becoming detached or accidentally folded over and overlapping itself could only be the result of a print transfer technique popularised with decorative china of the Victorian era, a technique which lends itself to mass production and lower cost when compared to hand decoration. Speculation In the speculation stage, we can consider the external evidence and begin a more rigorous investigation of the messaging, iconography, and possible meanings of the material artefact. Aspects of the set allow a number of useful observations about the role of such an object in its own time and context. Sociologists observe the role of toys as embodiments of particular types of parental messages and values (Cross 292) and note how particularly in the twentieth century “children’s play seems to become more and more a product of the educational and cultural orientation of parents” (Kline 96). Throughout history children’s toys often reflected a miniaturised version of the adult world allowing children to role-play as imagined adult-selves. Kristina Ranalli explored parallels between the practice of drinking tea and the play-acting of the child’s tea party, particularly in the nineteenth century, as a gendered ritual of gentility; a method of socialisation and education, and an opportunity for exploratory and even transgressive play by “spontaneously creating mini-societies with rules of their own” (20). Such toys and objects were available through the Sears mail-order catalogue from the very beginning at the end of the nineteenth century (McGuire). Propelled by the post-war boom of suburban development and homeownership—that generation’s manifestation of the American Dream—concern with home décor and design was elevated among the American mainstream to a degree never before seen. There was a hunger for new, streamlined, efficient, modernist living. In his essay titled “Domesticating Modernity”, historian Jeffrey L. Meikle notes that many early modernist designers found that perhaps the most potent way to “‘domesticate’ modernism and make it more familiar was to miniaturise it; for example, to shrink the skyscraper and put it into the home as furniture or tableware” (143). Dr Timothy Blade, curator of the 1985 exhibition of girls’ toys at the University of Minnesota’s Goldstein Gallery—now the Goldstein Museum of Design—described in his introduction “a miniaturised world with little props which duplicate, however rudely, the larger world of adults” (5). Noting the power of such toys to reflect adult values of their time, Blade continues: “the microcosm of the child’s world, remarkably furnished by the miniaturised props of their parents’ world, holds many direct and implied messages about the society which brought it into being” (9). In large part, the mid-century Sears catalogues capture the spirit of an era when, as collector Thomas Holland observes, “little girls were still primarily being offered only the options of glamour, beauty and parenthood as the stuff of their fantasies” (175). Holland notes that “the Wishbooks of the fifties [and, I would add, the sixties] assumed most girls would follow in their mother’s footsteps to become full-time housewives and mommies” (1). Blade grouped toys into three categories: cooking, cleaning, and sewing. A tea set could arguably be considered part of the cooking category, but closer examination of the language used in marketing this object—“little hostesses”, et cetera—suggests an emphasis not on cooking but on serving or entertaining. This particular category was not prevalent in the era examined by Blade, but the cultural shifts of the mid-twentieth century, particularly the rapid popularisation of a suburban lifestyle, may have led to the use of entertaining as an additional distinct category of role play in the process of learning to become a “proper” homemaker. Sears and other retailers offered a wide variety of styles of toy tea sets during this era. Blade and numerous other sources observe that children’s toy furniture and appliances tended to reflect the style and aesthetic qualities of their contemporary parallels in the adult world, the better to associate the child’s objects to its adult equivalent. The toy tea set’s packaging trumpets messages intended to appeal to modernist values and identity including “Contemporary Design” and “handsome, clean-line styling for modern little hostesses”. The use of this coded marketing language, aimed particularly at parents, can be traced back several decades. In 1928 a group of American industrial and textile designers established the American Designers' Gallery in New York, in part to encourage American designers to innovate and adopt new styles such as those seen in the L’ Exposition Internationale des Arts Decoratifs et Industriels Modernes (1925) in Paris, the exposition that sparked international interest in the Art Deco or Art Moderne aesthetic. One of the gallery founders, Ilonka Karasz, a Hungarian-American industrial and textile designer who had studied in Austria and was influenced by the Wiener Werkstätte in Vienna, publicised her new style of nursery furnishings as “designed for the very modern American child” (Brown 80). Sears itself was no stranger to the appeal of such language. The term “contemporary design” was ubiquitous in catalogue copy of the nineteen-fifties and sixties, used to describe everything from draperies (1959) and bedspreads (1961) to spice racks (1964) and the Lady Kenmore portable dishwasher (1961). An emphasis on the role of design in one’s life and surroundings can be traced back to efforts by MoMA. The museum’s interest in modern design hearkens back almost to the institution’s inception, particularly in relation to industrial design and the aestheticisation of everyday objects (Marshall). Through exhibitions and in partnership with mass-market magazines, department stores and manufacturer showrooms, MoMA curators evangelised the importance of “good design” a term that can be found in use as early as 1942. What Is Good Design? followed the pattern of prior exhibitions such as What Is Modern Painting? and situated modern design at the centre of exhibitions that toured the United States in the first half of the nineteen-fifties. To MoMA and its partners, “good design” signified the narrow identification of proper taste in furniture, home decor and accessories; effectively, the establishment of a design canon. The viewpoints enshrined in these exhibitions and partnerships were highly influential on the nation’s perception of taste for decades to come, as the trickle-down effect reached a much broader segment of consumers than those that directly experienced the museum or its exhibitions (Lawrence.) This was evident not only at high-end shops such as Bloomingdale’s and Macy’s. Even mass-market retailers sought out well-known figures of modernist design to contribute to their offerings. Sears, for example, commissioned noted modernist designer and ceramicist Russel Wright to produce a variety of serving ware and decor items exclusively for the company. Notably for this study, he was also commissioned to create a toy tea set for children. The 1957 Wishbook touts the set as “especially created to delight modern little misses”. Within its Good Design series, MoMA exhibitions celebrated numerous prominent Nordic designers who were exploring simplified forms and new material technologies. In the 1968 Wishbook, the retailer describes the Porcelain Toy Tea Set as “Danish-inspired china for young moderns”. The reference to Danish design is certainly compatible with the modernist appeal; after the explosion in popularity of Danish furniture design, the term “Danish Modern” was commonly used in the nineteen-fifties and sixties as shorthand for pan-Scandinavian or Nordic design, or more broadly for any modern furniture design regardless of origin that exhibited similar characteristics. In subsequent decades the notion of a monolithic Scandinavian-Nordic design aesthetic or movement has been debunked as primarily an economically motivated marketing ploy (Olivarez et al.; Fallan). In the United States, the term “Danish Modern” became so commonly misused that the Danish Society for Arts and Crafts called upon the American Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to legally restrict the use of the labels “Danish” and “Danish Modern” to companies genuinely originating in Denmark. Coincidentally the FTC ruled on this in 1968, noting “that ‘Danish Modern’ carries certain meanings, and... that consumers might prefer goods that are identified with a foreign culture” (Hansen 451). In the case of the Porcelain Toy Tea Set examined here, Sears was not claiming that the design was “Danish” but rather “Danish-inspired”. One must wonder, was this another coded marketing ploy to communicate a sense of “Good Design” to potential customers? An examination of the formal qualities of the set’s components, particularly the simplified geometric forms and the handle style of the cups, confirms that it is unlike a traditional—say, Victorian-style—tea set. Punchard observes that during this era some American tea sets were actually being modelled on coffee services rather than traditional tea services (148). A visual comparison of other sets sold by Sears in the same year reveals a variety of cup and pot shapes—with some similar to the set in question—while others exhibit more traditional teapot and cup shapes. Coffee culture was historically prominent in Nordic cultures so there is at least a passing reference to that aspect of Nordic—if not specifically Danish—influence in the design. But what of the decorative motif? Simple curved lines were certainly prominent in Danish furniture and architecture of this era, and occasionally found in combination with straight lines, but no connection back to any specific Danish motif could be found even after consultation with experts in the field from the Museum of Danish America and the Vesterheim National Norwegian-American Museum (personal correspondence). However, knowing that the average American consumer of this era—even the design-savvy among them—consumed Scandinavian design without distinguishing between the various nations, a possible explanation could be contained in the promotion of Finnish textiles at the time. In the decade prior to the manufacture of the tea set a major design tendency began to emerge in the United States, triggered by the geometric design motifs of the Finnish textile and apparel company Marimekko. Marimekko products were introduced to the American market in 1959 via the Cambridge, Massachusetts-based retailer Design Research (DR) and quickly exploded in popularity particularly after would-be First Lady Jacqueline Kennedy appeared in national media wearing Marimekko dresses during the 1960 presidential campaign and on the cover of Sports Illustrated magazine. (Thompson and Lange). The company’s styling soon came to epitomise a new youth aesthetic of the early nineteen sixties in the United States, a softer and more casual predecessor to the London “mod” influence. During this time multiple patterns were released that brought a sense of whimsy and a more human touch to classic mechanical patterns and stripes. The patterns Piccolo (1953), Helmipitsi (1959), and Varvunraita (1959), all designed by Vuokko Eskolin-Nurmesniemi offered varying motifs of parallel straight lines. Maija Isola's Silkkikuikka (1961) pattern—said to be inspired by the plumage of the Great Crested Grebe—combined parallel serpentine lines with straight and angled lines, available in a variety of colours. These and other geometrically inspired patterns quickly inundated apparel and decor markets. DR built a vastly expanded Cambridge flagship store and opened new locations in New York in 1961 and 1964, and in San Francisco in 1965 fuelled in no small part by the fact that they remained the exclusive outlet for Marimekko in the United States. It is clear that Marimekko’s approach to pattern influenced designers and manufacturers across industries. Design historian Lesley Jackson demonstrates that Marimekko designs influenced or were emulated by numerous other companies across Scandinavia and beyond (72-78). The company’s influence grew to such an extent that some described it as a “conquest of the international market” (Hedqvist and Tarschys 150). Subsequent design-forward retailers such as IKEA and Crate and Barrel continue to look to Marimekko even today for modern design inspiration. In 2016 the mass-market retailer Target formed a design partnership with Marimekko to offer an expansive limited-edition line in their stores, numbering over two hundred items. So, despite the “Danish” misnomer, it is quite conceivable that designers working for or commissioned by Sears in 1968 may have taken their aesthetic cues from Marimekko’s booming work, demonstrating a clear understanding of the contemporary high design aesthetic of the time and coding the marketing rhetoric accordingly even if incorrectly. Conclusion The Sears catalogue plays a unique role in capturing cross-sections of American culture not only as a sales tool but also in Holland’s words as “a beautifully illustrated diary of America, it’s [sic] people and the way we thought about things” (1). Applying a rhetorical and material culture analysis to the catalogue and the objects within it provides a unique glimpse into the roles these objects played in mediating relationships, transmitting values and embodying social practices, tastes and beliefs of mid-century American consumers. Adult consumers familiar with the characteristics of the culture of “Good Design” potentially could have made a connection between the simplified geometric forms of the components of the toy tea set and say the work of modernist tableware designers such as Kaj Franck, or between the set’s graphic pattern and the modernist motifs of Marimekko and its imitators. But for a much broader segment of the population with a less direct understanding of modernist aesthetics, those connections may not have been immediately apparent. The rhetorical messaging behind the objects’ packaging and marketing used class and taste signifiers such as modern, contemporary and “Danish” to reinforce this connection to effect an emotional and aspirational appeal. These messages were coded to position the set as an effective transmitter of modernist values and to target parents with the ambition to create “appropriately modern” environments for their children. References Ancestry.com. “Historic Catalogs of Sears, Roebuck and Co., 1896–1993.” <http://search.ancestry.com/search/db.aspx?dbid=1670>. Baker Furniture Inc. “Design Legacy: Our Story.” n.d. <http://www.bakerfurniture.com/design-story/ legacy-of-quality/design-legacy/>. Blade, Timothy Trent. “Introduction.” Child’s Play, Woman’s Work: An Exhibition of Miniature Toy Appliances: June 12, 1985–September 29, 1985. St. Paul: Goldstein Gallery, U Minnesota, 1985. Brown, Ashley. “Ilonka Karasz: Rediscovering a Modernist Pioneer.” Studies in the Decorative Arts 8.1 (2000-1): 69–91. Cross, Gary. “Gendered Futures/Gendered Fantasies: Toys as Representatives of Changing Childhood.” American Journal of Semiotics 12.1 (1995): 289–310. Dolansky, Fanny. “Playing with Gender: Girls, Dolls, and Adult Ideals in the Roman World.” Classical Antiquity 31.2 (2012): 256–92. Fallan, Kjetil. Scandinavian Design: Alternative Histories. Berg, 2012. Folkmann, Mads Nygaard, and Hans-Christian Jensen. “Subjectivity in Self-Historicization: Design and Mediation of a ‘New Danish Modern’ Living Room Set.” Design and Culture 7.1 (2015): 65–84. Hansen, Per H. “Networks, Narratives, and New Markets: The Rise and Decline of Danish Modern Furniture Design, 1930–1970.” The Business History Review 80.3 (2006): 449–83. Hedqvist, Hedvig, and Rebecka Tarschys. “Thoughts on the International Reception of Marimekko.” Marimekko: Fabrics, Fashions, Architecture. Ed. Marianne Aav. Bard. 2003. 149–71. Highmore, Ben. The Design Culture Reader. Routledge, 2008. Holland, Thomas W. Girls’ Toys of the Fifties and Sixties: Memorable Catalog Pages from the Legendary Sears Christmas Wishbooks, 1950-1969. Windmill, 1997. Hucal, Sarah. "Scandi Crush Saga: How Scandinavian Design Took over the World." Curbed, 23 Mar. 2016. <http://www.curbed.com/2016/3/23/11286010/scandinavian-design-arne-jacobsen-alvar-aalto-muuto-artek>. Jackson, Lesley. “Textile Patterns in an International Context: Precursors, Contemporaries, and Successors.” Marimekko: Fabrics, Fashions, Architecture. Ed. Marianne Aav. Bard. 2003. 44–83. Kline, Stephen. “The Making of Children’s Culture.” The Children’s Culture Reader. Ed. Henry Jenkins. New York: NYU P, 1998. 95–109. Lawrence, Sidney. “Declaration of Function: Documents from the Museum of Modern Art’s Design Crusade, 1933-1950.” Design Issues 2.1 (1985): 65–77. Marshall, Jennifer Jane. Machine Art 1934. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2012. McGuire, Sheila. “Playing House: Sex-Roles and the Child’s World.” Child’s Play, Woman’s Work: An Exhibition of Miniature Toy Appliances : June 12, 1985–September 29, 1985. St. Paul: Goldstein Gallery, U Minnesota, 1985. Meikel, Jeffrey L. “Domesticating Modernity: Ambivalence and Appropriation, 1920–1940.” Designing Modernity; the Arts of Reform and Persuasion. Ed. Wendy Kaplan. Thames & Hudson, 1995. 143–68. O’Brien, Marion, and Aletha C. Huston. “Development of Sex-Typed Play Behavior in Toddlers.” Developmental Psychology, 21.5 (1985): 866–71. Olivarez, Jennifer Komar, Jukka Savolainen, and Juulia Kauste. Finland: Designed Environments. Minneapolis Institute of Arts and Nordic Heritage Museum, 2014. Oswell, David. The Agency of Children: From Family to Global Human Rights. Cambridge UP, 2013. Prown, Jules David. “Mind in Matter: An Introduction to Material Culture Theory and Method.” Winterthur Portfolio 17.1 (1982): 1–19. Punchard, Lorraine May. Child’s Play: Play Dishes, Kitchen Items, Furniture, Accessories. Punchard, 1982. Ranalli, Kristina. An Act Apart: Tea-Drinking, Play and Ritual. Master's thesis. U Delaware, 2013. Sears Corporate Archives. “What Is a Sears Modern Home?” n.d. <http://www.searsarchives.com/homes/index.htm>. "Target Announces New Design Partnership with Marimekko: It’s Finnish, Target Style." Target, 2 Mar. 2016. <http://corporate.target.com/article/2016/03/marimekko-for-target>. Teglasi, Hedwig. “Children’s Choices of and Value Judgments about Sex-Typed Toys and Occupations.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 18.2 (1981): 184–95. Thompson, Jane, and Alexandra Lange. Design Research: The Store That Brought Modern Living to American Homes. Chronicle, 2010.

<em>Abstract</em>.-Diadromous species encounter highly variable water quality as they traverse freshwater, estuarine, and marine environments. The U.S. federally endangered shortnose sturgeon <em>Acipenser brevirostrum </em>is a diadromous estuarine resident species that relies heavily on tidal freshwater regions of estuaries as spawning, nursery, and foraging habitat. A recent recovery in abundance in the Hudson River shortnose sturgeon population coincided with an ecosystem shift in the tidal freshwater estuary from hypoxia to normoxia (dissolved oxygen > 4 mg/L) during the summer juvenile rearing period. Decades of persistent summertime hypoxia encompassing as much as 40% of shortnose sturgeon nursery habitat was followed by a sudden shift to normoxia (1970 to 1978) due to the U.S. Clean Water Act legislation. Here, we evaluate how past and present water quality in the tidal freshwater Hudson River affects nursery habitat suitability. Habitat suitability, as indexed by potential instantaneous growth rate, was estimated with an empirically derived bioenergetic growth model before (pre-1978: 20% and 40% dissolved oxygen [DO] saturation) and after (1988: 85% DO saturation) the shift in seasonal ecosystem oxygenation. Habitat suitability was then forecast in the context of regional climate change and potential zebra mussel <em>Dreissena polymorpha </em>oxygen demand. Results from this simulation study indicated that even moderate reductions in water quality can significantly lower habitat suitability, supporting the circumstantial association between improved water quality and shortnose sturgeon recovery. Although presently occurring at high abundance levels, Hudson River shortnose sturgeon in the future may encounter diminished nursery habitat due to warming temperatures and increased benthic oxygen demand by zebra mussels.