Academic literature on the topic 'Human cloning – Research – Law and legislation'

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science. Human Cloning Research Prohibition Act: Report (to accompany H.R. 922) (including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office). U.S. G.P.O., 1997.

Human Cloning Prohibition Act of 2001: Report together with dissenting views (to accompany H.. 2505) (including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office). U.S. G.P.O., 2001.

The Human Cloning Prohibition Act of 2001 and the Cloning Prohibition Act of 2001: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Health of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, One Hundred Seventh Congress, first session on H.R. 1644 and H.R. 2172,, June 20, 2001. U.S. G.P.O., 2001.

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Appropriations. Subcommittee on Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies. Cloning, 2002: Hearings before a subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, United States Senate, One Hundred Seventh Congress, second session : special hearings, January 24, 2002, Washington, DC, March 12, 2002, Washington, DC. U.S. G.P.O., 2002.

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Appropriations. Subcommittee on Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies. Cloning, 2001: Hearing before a subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, United States Senate, One Hundred Seventh Congress, first session : special hearing, December 4, 2001, Washington, DC. U.S. G.P.O., 2002.

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Institute of Government and Public Affairs. The challenges of human cloning for public policy in Illinois. Institute of Government and Public Affairs, University of Illinois, 2001.

Sándor, Judit. Perfect copy?: Law and ethics of reproductive medicine. Center for Ethics and Law in Biomedicine, 2009.

Commission, European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies to the European. Opinion on ethical aspects of patenting inventions involving human stem cells: Opinion no. 16. Office of Official Publications of the European Communities, 2002.

(Japan), Kagaku Gijutsuchō Kagaku Gijutsu Seisaku Kenkyūjo. Seimei to hō: Kurōn kenkyū wa doko made jiyū ka. Ōkurashō Insatsukyoku, 2000.

Environment, United States Congress House Committee on Commerce Subcommittee on Health and the. Cloning: Legal, medical, ethical, and social issues : hearing before the Subcommittee on Health and Environment of the Committee on Commerce, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fifth Congress, second session, February 12, 1998. U.S. G.P.O., 1998.

Guangliang, Tang. "Patentability of Research Results in Connection with Human-Embryonic Stem Cells, especially with the So-Called Therapeutic Cloning – Chinese Points of View." In MPI Studies on Intellectual Property, Competition and Tax Law. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02496-2_3.

Lalova, Teodora, Anastassia Negrouk, Laurent Dollé, et al. "An Overview of Belgian Legislation Applicable to Biobank Research and Its Interplay with Data Protection Rules." In GDPR and Biobanking. Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49388-2_10.

Jackson, Emily. "13. Embryo Research, Stem Cells, and Emerging Biotechnologies." In Medical Law. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198825845.003.0013.

Olmos, Samuel, and José Julio Nares. "Applying Fault Trees to the Analysis at the Minimum Age for Sexual Consent in the Criminal Law of México." In Handbook of Research on Trends and Issues in Crime Prevention, Rehabilitation, and Victim Support. IGI Global, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1286-9.ch005.

Kartskhiya, Alexander. "LEGAL ASPECTS OF MODERN BIOTECHNOLOGY." In LAW IN FUTURE: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, INNOVATION, INTERNET. INION RAN, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.31249/pravbud/2019.00.11.

Luong, Hai Thanh. "Contributions and Responsibilities of Police Forces in Natural Disasters." In Advances in Human and Social Aspects of Technology. IGI Global, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-7210-8.ch005.

Weir, Alan, and Kate Macdougall. "Ethics." In An Introduction to Clinical Research. Oxford University Press, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199570072.003.0011.

Berlin, Mark S. "Explaining the Criminalization of Atrocities." In Criminalizing Atrocity. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198850441.003.0002.

Berlin, Mark S. "The Puzzle of Atrocity Criminalization." In Criminalizing Atrocity. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198850441.003.0001.

"The important point here is that no act of fertilisation is involved and it is on this point that the arguments were made. The original Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 was amended in 2000 so that cloned embryos were covered, but the definition of an embryo, that is a fertilised egg, was not altered. Since a cloned embryo has not undergone fertilisation it is not in fact covered by the Act. So although a contradiction in terms, for the purpose of the law a cloned embryo is not an embryo. The outcome of this was that the High Court decided that the licensing arrangements for embryo cloning did not hold for implantation of cloned embryos. All of a sudden it became apparent that producing an infant from a cloned adult cell was not ruled out. This legislative anomaly was that it should never have been exposed by a court ruling; it should have been dealt with by Parliament long ago. When Dolly the sheep was born in 1997 it was immediately obvious that sex may not be the only way to produce new offspring. In the US, the government quickly took this on board and revised its own definition of an embryo. In the UK, the committee of MPs dealing with science and technology warned the government of the potential problems this definition of an embryo might cause. On Friday, 18 January 2002, the Master of Rolls, Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers, sitting with two other judges, said that an embryo created by cloning did fall within the legal definition of an embryo, even though no fertilisation had taken place. This finally brought human cloning in the UK for medical research into the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990. Whether you agree or disagree with the principles involved there are many questions which are raised. Broadly speaking, there are two types of cloning in use here. One is cloning fertilised embryo cells and the other is cloning of other cells. But what is the difference? If nature can, and does, produce complete individuals from a single cell, then at what point do we say that cloning a cell is tantamount to usurping the position of nature. But it is the very nature of human curiosity to try to understand the world about us, including how it is that we cannot artificially create a viable organism. Put bluntly, if it happens in nature, why can’t we do it? This debate is complicated because identical twins can be seen as clones of each other. Although semantic debates in themselves can be interesting it would at this stage be worth considering what we mean by ‘clone’ and why it results in some very specific grammar. A clone is any group of cells, which includes a complete organism, which derives from a single progenitor cell. So Dolly the sheep is a clone of her mother, cloned from a cell of her mother. Identical twins are clones of each other from an original ovum. So not only do we clone by accident, in the case of identical twins, but for at least the last half century we have been cloning human cells deliberately and this deliberate cloning has been done in the quest for methods of prenatal diagnostics. When foetal cells are removed so that they can be tested for large scale genetic defects, such as Down’s syndrome and other conditions not compatible with life, the cells are routinely grown before the testing is carried out. Each group of cells is a clone of the first one which started dividing, each clone has the entire genetic content of the foetus from which it originated, but no one would suggest that there is sentience or soul present. Many of the samples of cloned cells are then frozen." In Genetics and DNA Technology: Legal Aspects. Routledge-Cavendish, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781843146995-19.

Bobrovnyk, S. V. "Institution of the protection of human rights: the doctrinal level of research." In EUROPEAN POTENTIAL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF LEGAL SCIENCE, LEGISLATION AND LAW ENFORCEMENT PRACTICE. Baltija Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-040-7-1.

Cherkasova, Yelena Valeryevna. "RELEVANCE OF LINGUISTIC RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF LAW." In Russian science: actual researches and developments. Samara State University of Economics, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.46554/russian.science-2020.03-1-427/430.