Academic literature on the topic 'Hyperglobalization'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Hyperglobalization.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Hyperglobalization"
1
González Martín, Andrés. "Hiperglobalización y Geoeconomía. ¿El futuro que emerge?." Araucaria, no. 44 (2020): 521–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.12795/araucaria.2020.i44.24.
Full text
2
Altuzarra, Amaia, Ricardo Bustillo, and Carlos Rodríguez. "Is world trade slowing down? New evidence on trade-income elasticity." Panoeconomicus, no. 00 (2020): 13. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/pan190722013a.
Full textAbstract:
This paper furthers and updates the research on the nature of the so-called global trade slowdown. Not only do we explain and discuss the determinants of this phenomenon, but we also offer an empirical description of the recent evolution of trade and trade elasticity. With the purpose of testing whether this is a structural phenomenon or not, we build an Error Correction Model for both world and regional data on trade and income using data from the World Bank for the period 1970-2017. World, OECD and Asian countries trade elasticity figures show a remarkable reduction after the hyperglobalization period (1986-2001), opposed to those of Latin America where trade volume has not stagnated so much. This slowdown might have major consequences for any country, but especially for those which have relied more intensively on trade as an engine for growth.
3
Haggart, Blayne. "Global platform governance and the internet-governance impossibility theorem." Journal of Digital Media & Policy 11, no. 3 (November 1, 2020): 321–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1386/jdmp_00028_1.
Full textAbstract:
Economist Dani Rodrik argues that global economic governance is characterized by a trilemma: ‘we cannot have hyperglobalization, democracy, and national self-determination all at once. We can have at most two out of three’. This trilemma can also be applied to internet governance and global platform governance as a corollary global internet-governance impossibility theorem. This trilemma, which emphasizes who sets the rules and the degree of democratic accountability they face, offers us a way to evaluate online content-regulation proposals. This article applies this framework to four prominent platform-governance proposals: Facebook’s proposal for a global ‘Oversight Board’; David Kaye’s book Speech Police; the United Kingdom’s Online Harms White Paper; and French president Emmanuel Macron’s speech to the 2018 Internet Governance Forum. Of the four, only Macron’s framework offers a pathway to reconciling democratic accountability with the existence of different legitimate views on how content should be regulated.
4
Mearsheimer, John J. "Bound to Fail: The Rise and Fall of the Liberal International Order." International Security 43, no. 4 (April 2019): 7–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00342.
Full textAbstract:
The liberal international order, erected after the Cold War, was crumbling by 2019. It was flawed from the start and thus destined to fail. The spread of liberal democracy around the globe—essential for building that order—faced strong resistance because of nationalism, which emphasizes self-determination. Some targeted states also resisted U.S. efforts to promote liberal democracy for security-related reasons. Additionally, problems arose because a liberal order calls for states to delegate substantial decisionmaking authority to international institutions and to allow refugees and immigrants to move easily across borders. Modern nation-states privilege sovereignty and national identity, however, which guarantees trouble when institutions become powerful and borders porous. Furthermore, the hyperglobalization that is integral to the liberal order creates economic problems among the lower and middle classes within the liberal democracies, fueling a backlash against that order. Finally, the liberal order accelerated China's rise, which helped transform the system from unipolar to multipolar. A liberal international order is possible only in unipolarity. The new multipolar world will feature three realist orders: a thin international order that facilitates cooperation, and two bounded orders—one dominated by China, the other by the United States—poised for waging security competition between them.
5
Rewizorski, Marek. "Between hyperglobalization and national policy. Is there a way to mitigate populist risks for global economic governance in the post-Covid-19 world?" International Organisations Research Journal 16, no. 2 (June 30, 2021): 132–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2021-02-07.
Full textAbstract:
Some scholars of global governance advocate rebalancing from global to national governance. They underline the incompatibility of global economic governance with democracies, which have the right to protect their social arrangements. They discern the fact that global (economic) governance is under heavy fire from a new vox populi, underscoring the socio-economic and cultural sources of their resentment and opposition to the liberal international order. While pointing at the timeliness of such argumentation, this article examines the fundamental problem with a sovereignty-related solution to the populist challenge. It lies in the fact that reconstituting global economic steering with a stronger emphasis on sovereignty may open the door for pursuing distinct national policies, which have blossomed during the Covid-19 pandemic and which not only overlap with populism but dismantle the benefits of international cooperation in the post-Covid-19 world. By asking about the role of the fragmented system of economic governance in inspiring populist resentment, this article creates an opportunity not only to address the challenges to global economic governance, but more specifically to reflect upon: the justification of decisive shifts toward national governance; risks which remain hidden for those discontented with economic globalization; and drafting an alternative solution, namely taking the middle way between hyper globalization and a more national policy.
6
BILORUS, Oleh, Volodymyr VLASOV, Sergіi GASANOV, and Igor KHANIN. "The end of the globalization erа, deglobalization, “new” globalization, or transition to noospheric co-development?" Fìnansi Ukraïni 2020, no. 8 (October 23, 2020): 7–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.33763/finukr2020.08.007.
Full textAbstract:
The article highlights the controversial issues of the state, contradictions and trends of modern globalization in the face of new challenges and threats associated with political, immigration, pandemic, climate, economic and trade shocks – Britain’s exit from the EU, the implementation of the US President’s policy “America Above All”, the beginning of trade de-globalization as a result of the revision of free trade agreements (FTAs) and the trade “war” between the United States and China, the impact of the global COVID-19 pandemic and climate change on deepening the global economic recession, the collapse of national economies and international trade, lack of financial resources for active government support of the health care systems, social protection, small and medium-sized businesses. Political, economic, managerial and academic circles are actively discussing the problems of the “end” of globalization, de-globalization, “new” globalization, the need for a “new world order”, which will actually embody the fundamental values of democracy, economic freedom, free trade and, at the same time, will strengthen social responsibility of the world community and its international institutions, the main geopolitical, geo-economic and military centers of power (primarily the United States, China, the European Union, Russia, etc.) for the preservation of peace on the basis of consensus, recognition of global priorities in countering climatic and epidemic threats to human life on Earth , consistent implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals to eradicate poverty in all its forms and manifestations, combat inequality within and between countries, ensure continuous, inclusive and sustainable economic growth and promote social inclusion. The article drew attention to the strengthening of the trends of protectionism and economic nationalism, in particular, the US withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement and attempts to revise the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The article shows the loss of the US leadership in world trade due to the accelerated economic development of other countries, primarily the Asian region. The discussion of these problems at the Davos Economic Forum led to the conclusion about the likely end of Atlanticism and globalization. At the same time, the UN report (2018) highlighted a special section on trade hyperglobalization. The article hypothesizes that the Bali Round (2013) of negotiations on trade began the fourth wave of its globalization, and proposes a new theory of international trade – the theory of globalization impact.
7
BILORUS, Oleh, Volodymyr VLASOV, Sergіi GASANOV, and Igor KHANIN. "The end of the globalization erа, deglobalization, “new” globalization, or transition to noospheric co-development? (part 2)." Fìnansi Ukraïni 2020, no. 10 (December 24, 2020): 7–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.33763/finukr2020.10.007.
Full textAbstract:
The article highlights the controversial issues of the state, contradictions and trends of modern globalization in the face of new challenges and threats associated with political, immigration, pandemic, climate, economic and trade shocks – Britain’s exit from the EU, the implementation of the US President’s policy “America Above All”, the beginning of trade de-globalization as a result of the revision of free trade agreements (FTAs) and the trade “war” between the United States and China, the impact of the global COVID-19 pandemic and climate change on deepening the global economic recession, the collapse of national economies and international trade, lack of financial resources for active government support of the health care systems, social protection, small and medium-sized businesses. Political, economic, managerial and academic circles are actively discussing the problems of the “end” of globalization, de-globalization, “new” globalization, the need for a “new world order”, which will actually embody the fundamental values ??of democracy, economic freedom, free trade and, at the same time, will strengthen social responsibility of the world community and its international institutions, the main geopolitical, geo-economic and military centers of power (primarily the United States, China, the European Union, Russia, etc.) for the preservation of peace on the basis of consensus, recognition of global priorities in countering climatic and epidemic threats to human life on Earth , consistent implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals to eradicate poverty in all its forms and manifestations, combat inequality within and between countries, ensure continuous, inclusive and sustainable economic growth and promote social inclusion. The article drew attention to the strengthening of the trends of protectionism and economic nationalism, in particular, the US withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement and attempts to revise the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The article shows the loss of the US leadership in world trade due to the accelerated economic development of other countries, primarily the Asian region. The discussion of these problems at the Davos Economic Forum led to the conclusion about the likely end of Atlanticism and globalization. At the same time, the UN report (2018) highlighted a special section on trade hyperglobalization. The article hypothesizes that the Bali Round (2013) of negotiations on trade began the fourth wave of its globalization, and proposes a new theory of international trade – the theory of globalization impact.
8
Subramanian, Arvind, and Martin Kessler. "The Hyperglobalization of Trade and its Future." SSRN Electronic Journal, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2297994.
Full text
9
Porcile, Gabriel. "Financial Globalization as a Barrier to Democratic Consolidation: a North-South Model with Public Goods." Journal of Globalization and Development, July 7, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jgd-2019-0009.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractThis paper modifies the Acemoglu–Robinson model of the economic basis of democracy to discuss the impact of the international regime regulating capital flows on the consolidation and quality of democracy. Two regimes of capital mobility are considered, Bretton Woods and Rodrik’s hyperglobalization, in an international economy formed by an advanced North and a developing South. The model shows that hyperglobalization compromises the stability of democracy in the South by limiting the ability of the citizens to tax the elite and provide public goods which are critical for technical change and income distribution. At variance with the mainstream results, it is argued that financial globalization is a barrier to democratic consolidation. The model is consistent with key findings of the empirical literature on globalization and democracy, as well as with evidence from the economic history of Latin America.
Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Hyperglobalization"
1
Tenier, Solenn. "Hypermondialisation et pensée artistique critique : enjeux d'un écrit du réel et d'une émancipation spéculative à l'ère des NTIC." Thesis, Strasbourg, 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2019STRAC019.
Full textAbstract:
Ce travail de recherche artistique, soulève et propose d’étudier ces questions par le biais d’un fil conducteur : les enjeux de la pensée artistique. Une des perspectives envisageables, est celle de l’inclusion de la création artistique au sein des différents niveaux intellectuels et décisionnels œuvrant à la construction de notre monde ; mais aussi de la mutation du statut de l’artiste, rendue possible par l’utilisation des Nouvelles technologies de l’information et de la communication et permettant une liberté d’expression et de création artistique « nouvelle ». La créativité ne serait-elle pas la clé de l’avenir de notre société ? Les innovations technologiques et sociétales ne dépendront-elles pas des artistes ? La majorité des formes artistiques ont depuis longtemps démontré l’indépendance de leur pensée, leur humanité, leur force d’anticipation et de clairvoyance. C’est la raison pour laquelle ce travail construit ses mécanismes de pensées d’un point de vue artistique. Artistique dans l’exercice d’une mémoire citoyenne. Artistique dans ses propres expérimentations créatives (narration et pratique spéculative). Artistique dans la méthodologie de recherche et dans l’approche scientifique. Et enfin, artistique dans la forme, celle de l’objet-thèseThis artistic research’s work raises these questions through a common thread: the stakes of artistic thought. One of the possible perspectives, is the inclusion of the artistic creation within the different intellectual and decisive levels that contribute to the construction to the world as we know it. The mutation of the status of the artist that is made possible by the use of new technologies of information and communication that allows freedom of expression. Will creativity be the key to the future of our society ? Will technological and social innovations depend on artists ? The majority of artistic forms have long since demonstrated the independence of their thought, their humanity, their strength of anticipation and clairvoyance. That's the reason this work constructs its thought processes from an artistic point of view. Artistic in the exercise of a citizen memory. Artistic in his own creative experiments (narration and speculative practice). Artistic in the research methodology and in the scientific approach. And finally, artistic in the form, that of the object-thesis
Book chapters on the topic "Hyperglobalization"
1
Braunstein, Elissa, Piergiuseppe Fortunato, and Richard Kozul-Wright. "Trade and Investment in the Era of Hyperglobalization." In The Palgrave Handbook of Development Economics, 727–62. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14000-7_21.
Full text
2
"Dissatisfaction with hyperglobalization." In Latin America and the Caribbean in the World Economy, 29–86. UN, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.18356/8d45a349-en.
Full text
3
Subramanian, Arvind, and Martin Kessler. "The Hyperglobalization of Trade and Its Future." In Towards a Better Global Economy, 216–88. Oxford University Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198723455.003.0004.
Full text