Academic literature on the topic 'IIndians'

Foreign iExchange iRisk imanagement iis itechnique iof iminimising ithe irisk idue ito ifluctuation iin ivalue iof icurrency iin iconcern. iIf iwe italk iof iIndian iRupees iagainst iUS iDollars. iIt icould ibe iwithout idifficulty iobserved ithat iUS idollar ilook ilike ito ibe ivalued iagainst ithe ivalue iof iIndian iRupee iwith iway iof itime. iAlthough iit iis itough ito icomment ion iany isingle ireason ifor isuch isort iof iappreciation ior idepreciation iof icurrencies. iAs ithere iare iso imany ifactors iat iMicro iand iMacro ilevel ilike iInflation, iInterest iRates, iExport-Import, iBalance iof iPayment, iTrade iDeficit, iCurrency iin iUsage, iEconomic iPolicies iof iNation ior iUnion, iHolding iTendency iof iForex iTraders/ iSpeculators, iCirculation. iAlthough iits ihard ito icomment ithat iwhat iaccurate icurrency ipolicy ishould ibe iaccepted iso ithat ieconomy iwould ihave isustainable idevelopment. iThe iObjective iof iResearch iPaper iis ito istudy ithe irelationship ibetween iInflation iof iIndia iand iUS iwith ialter iwith ivalue iof iRupee iagainst iUS iDollar. iEven iif iinflation iis inot iseparate ifactor ito idecide icurrency iprice ibut istill iimperative ifactor iin iformative icurrency ivalue, ias iinflation iimpacts iinvestment, iimport iand iexports itoo. iTo icheck ithe iimpact iof iRupee ivalue iin icontext iof iUS idollars, ithe idata iof i30 iYears iof iConsumer iPrice iIndex iof iUnited iStates iand iIndia ialong iwith i1USD=X iRupees ivalue iannual ihas ibeen itake iand iMultiple iCorrelation/ iRegression ianalysis iin iSPSS ihas ibeen iapplied. iForex iRate iis icomposite ivariable ithat idepends ion ia inumber iof imacroeconomic ivariables ilikeiLevel iof iForex iReserve-Low iforex ireserve iis ione imore ireason ifor icurrency ifall. iIndia‟s iforex ireserves ihave ideclined iin irecent ipast. iSo iIndia ihas ito iimport ithese iat iupper iprice. iWhen ithe irupee ivalue igets idepreciated i-Dollar iacquiring istrength iagainst iother icurrencies- iDollar iacquiring istrength iagainst iother icurrencies iis ianother ireason ias iin itoday‟s iworld iCross iCurrency iexchange irate ialso iexists idue itoarbitrage iand iease iin iGlobal iFinancial iTransactions. iAnother ireason ifor ireduction iof icurrency iis: ithere iis ino iclarity ion ipolicy ireforms iand inon iclarity ion iguiding iprinciple iin ireforms. iThis iresearch ihad ito ifind iout ithe irelationship ibetween iInflation i(Consumer iPrice iIndexiIndia i, iUnited iStates) iand isignificant ieconomical ifactors iand igot isome iuseful iresults ilinked ito ithis. iMultiple iCorrelation/ iRegression istudy ihas ibeen iused ito ido ithe ianalysis ibased ion iannual ibasis. I

his istudy iplanned ito ibuild iup ia isystem ifor iappropriate iuse iof irecycled iaggregate iin iwet imix imacadam i(WMM) icourse igot ifrom iconstruction iwaste iof ihighway iduring ithe iroad imaintenance iand iconstruction iThis iwill ihelp iin iaccomplishing ieconomy iin idevelopment iof iroads ijust ias isaving imoney ion icondition idebasement iin iterm iof idiminished imining iand iless ipollution. iDifferent ilab itests iwere iled ito idiscover ithe ilikelihood iof iutilizing irecycled iaggregate ifrom ivarious isources iin iIndia, ias ithe isubstitution iof ifresh iaggregate. iVarious itests iwas idone ito idecide ithe iproperties iof ithe ifresh iand irecycled iaggregate. iThe itest ioutcomes idemonstrated ithat ithe ispecific igravity iof ithe irecycled iaggregate iis i2.53 iand ielongation iindex irecord ias i12.5 i% iwhich iis iclose ito ifresh iaggregate. iThe imaximum idry idensity i(MDD) iand ioptimum imoisture icontent i(OMC) iof irecycled iaggregate iis i2.06 iand i9% iand ifor ifresh iaggregate iit iis i2.04 iand i8 i%. iThe ipermeability ifor ithe imaterial iutilized iin ipresent iresearch iis i3-6 iminute ifor i1 ito i10 icm idepth iand i3-7 iminute ifor i1 ito i10 icm idepth. iFrom ithe itest iit iconclude ithat ithe irecycled iaggregate iis ialso iusable iin ivarious iapplication iof ithe iroads, iwhere ithere iis ia irepetation iof iloads iis ilow ias icompared ito iroads iwith ihigh irepetation iof iloads ivalue.

Le Cerf (Cervus elaphus) et le Chevreuil (Capreolus capreolus) sont 2 cervidés qui abondent en Europe, ils partagent souvent le même habitat. Les cervidés passent en moyenne 50% de leur temps au repos, cependant les critères de sélection des sites de repos ont été peu étudiés. L'objectif de notre travail est double : i) décrire les patrons de sélection des sites de repos, pour chaque espèce et à différentes échelles spatiales et temporelle, et ii) comparer les patrons de sélection des deux espèces. L'étude a été menée au sein du Parc National des Cévennes, dans la Forêt Domaniale du Bougès. L'échantillonnage par transects a permis de décrire les caractéristiques de 425 reposées, au cours de 2 hivers et de 2 étés. La méthode PCR appliquée à l'ADN de poils prélevés sur les reposées s'est révélée pertinente pour distinguer Cerf et Chevreuil. A l'échelle du peuplement forestier, nous montrons un fort chevauchement entre Cerf et Chevreuil dans l'utilisation, pour se reposer, des différents types de peuplement. Les 2 cervidés ont tendance à éviter les peuplements résineux adultes été comme hiver. Le Chevreuil est moins sélectif à cette échelle, et utilise indifféremment les peuplements forestiers en été. Le Cerf a par contre un comportement très sélectif et manifeste une préférence marquée pour les jeunes peuplements résineux. A l'échelle du microhabitat, le Cerf et le Chevreuil recherchent toujours une bonne protection visuelle, à travers un couvert latéral important. Ce couvert est essentiellement composé de résineux pour le Cerf, alors que le Chevreuil utilise aussi les feuillus quand ils sont disponibles en été. En hiver, le Chevreuil se couche sous un fort couvert dans la canopée, ce couvert est plus élevé que pour le Cerf. Il se repose à proximité des lisières contrairement au Cerf qui s'en éloigne. Nous discutons ces différences de patron de sélection entre le Cerf, qui occupe un domaine vital étendu, et le Chevreuil, territorial, qui vit sur un domaine beaucoup plus restreint
Red Deer (Cervus elaphus) and Roe Deer (Capreolus capreolus) are two abundant cervids in Europe, and they often share the same habitat. Cervids rest for about half of the time. However their bedsite selection criteria have rarely been studied. Our goal is double : i) to describe bedsite selection patterns for each species at different temporospatial scales and ii) to compare those selection patterns between species. The study took place in the Forêt Domaniale du Bougès, Parc National des Cévennes, France. Transect sampling helped us describe the characteristics of 425 bedsites, within 2 winter and 2 summer periods. PCR methodology applied to hair DNA collected on the bedsites proved to be efficient to distinguish between Red and Roe Deer. At the forest stand scale, Red and Roe Deer widely overlap in their use of different stands types as bedding sites. Both cervids tend to avoid adult coniferous stands in winter and summer. Roe Deer is less selective than Red Deer at this scale and uses forest stands relative to their availability. Red Deer is highly selective and shows a marked preference for young coniferous stands. At the microhabitat scale, Red and Roe Deer always search for good visual protection, through a well developed lateral cover. That cover is predominantly composed by conifers for the Red Deer, whereas the Roe Deer also uses deciduous cover when it is available during summer. In winter, Roe Deer beds under a large canopy cover, this cover is larger than for Red Deer. It chooses bedsites near edges whereas Red Deer rests far away from them. We discuss those differences in the selection patterns between the Red Deer, that occupies a wide home range, and the territorial Roe Deer, that lives on a more restricted range