To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Illocutionary (speech) acts.

Books on the topic 'Illocutionary (speech) acts'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 23 books for your research on the topic 'Illocutionary (speech) acts.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse books on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Searle, John R. Foundations of illocutionary logic. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]: Cambridge University Press, 1985.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Illocutionary acts and sentence meaning. Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press, 2000.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Categories and complements of illocutionary verbs in a cognitive perspective. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1996.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Arnovick, Leslie K. Diachronic pragmatics: Seven case studies in English illocutionary development. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Pub., 1999.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Searle, John R. Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Vergaro, Carla. Illocutionary Shell Nouns in English. Lang AG International Academic Publishers, Peter, 2018.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Vergaro, Carla. Illocutionary Shell Nouns in English. Lang AG International Academic Publishers, Peter, 2018.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Vergaro, Carla. Illocutionary Shell Nouns in English. Lang AG International Academic Publishers, Peter, 2018.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Vergaro, Carla. Illocutionary Shell Nouns in English. Lang AG International Academic Publishers, Peter, 2018.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Hornsby, Jennifer. Speech Acts and Performatives. Edited by Ernest Lepore and Barry C. Smith. Oxford University Press, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199552238.003.0035.

Full text
Abstract:
This article aims to connect Austin's seminal notion of a speech act with developments in philosophy of language over the last forty odd years. It starts by considering how speech acts might be conceived in Austin's general theory. Then it turns to the illocutionary acts with which much philosophical writing on speech acts has been concerned, and finally to the performatives which Austin's own treatment of speech as action took off from.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Roberts, Craige. Speech Acts in Discourse Context. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198738831.003.0012.

Full text
Abstract:
This essay sketches an approach to speech acts in which mood does not semantically determine illocutionary force. The conventional content of mood determines the semantic type of the clause in which it occurs, and, given the nature of discourse, that type most naturally lends itself to a particular type of speech act, i.e. one of the three basic types of language game moves—making an assertion (declarative), posing a question (interrogative), or proposing to one’s addressee(s) the adoption of a goal (imperative). There is relative consensus about the semantics of two of these, the declarative and interrogative; and this consensus view is entirely compatible with the present proposal about the relationship between the semantics and pragmatics of grammatical mood. Hence, the proposal is illustrated with the more controversial imperative.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Arnovick, Leslie K. Diachronic Pragmatics: Seven Case Studies in English Illocutionary Development (Pragmatics and Beyond New Series). John Benjamins Publishing Co, 2000.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

Illocutionary Constructions in English : Cognitive Motivation and Linguistic Realization: A Study of the Syntactic Realizations of the Directive, Commissive and Expressive Speech Acts in English. Lang AG International Academic Publishers, Peter, 2013.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

Bianchi, Claudia. Perspectives and Slurs. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198791492.003.0011.

Full text
Abstract:
In discussing figurative speech, Lepore and Stone argue that metaphorical interpretation involves a process of perspective taking: metaphor invites us to organize our thinking about something through an analogical correspondence with something it is not. According to them, the same applies to slurs: some words come with an invitation to take a certain perspective, and uses of slurs are associated with ways of thinking about their targets that can harm people. My aim is to critically evaluate such a proposal, within a speech-acts framework. In the recent literature on hate speech, utterances containing slurs are conceived as speech acts in two distinct senses: 1. as perlocutionary acts that cause harm to their targets; 2. as illocutionary acts that constitute harm towards their targets. I will claim that Lepore and Stone’s proposal can be understood both in perlocutionary and illocutionary terms, and argue in favor of an illocutionary approach.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Henry, Rosita. Veiled commands: anthropological perspectives on directives. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198803225.003.0015.

Full text
Abstract:
The great diversity of command strategies that can be found cross-linguistically provides rich comparative material for consideration by speech act theorists and other linguistic philosophers. Speech act theory has generated productive debates on how illocutionary acts such as commands are situated in context, and the relationship between speech action, power relations, politics, and diplomacy. This chapter concerns the way culturally specific strategies for authority, politeness, and diplomacy are encoded in how people deliver directives to others. The focus is on veiled commands, especially in the context of public speeches in the Western Highlands of Papua New Guinea (PNG), as they relate to egalitarian values and concepts of autonomy. While veiled commands are not able to be universally correlated with an egalitarian ethos, in any context the veiling of words is related to the human awareness of others and that the world we inhabit is always a social world.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

Gerken, Mikkel. The Epistemic Norms of Assertion. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198803454.003.0008.

Full text
Abstract:
Chapter 7 extends the discussion of epistemic norms to the linguistic realm. Again, it is argued that a Knowledge Norm of Assertion (KNAS) is inadequate and should be replaced with a Warrant-Assertive Speech Act norm (WASA). According to WASA, S must be adequately warranted in believing that p relative to her conversational context in order to meet the epistemic requirements for asserting that p. This epistemic norm is developed and extended to assertive speech acts that carry implicatures or illocutionary forces. Particular attention is given to the development of a species of WASA that accounts for assertive speech acts having a directive force, such as a recommendation. Thus, Chapter 7 contributes to the debates concerning epistemic norms of assertions.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Murray, Sarah E., and William B. Starr. Force and Conversational States. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198738831.003.0009.

Full text
Abstract:
This essay sketches an approach to speech acts in which mood does not semantically determine illocutionary force. The conventional content of mood determines the semantic type of the clause in which it occurs, and, given the nature of discourse, that type most naturally lends itself to serving as a particular type of speech act, that is, to serving as one of the three basic types of language game moves-making an assertion (declarative); posing a question (interrogative); or proposing to one’s addressee(s) the adoption of a goal (imperative). This type of semantics for grammatical mood is illustrated with the imperative.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

Leech, Geoffrey. Pragmatics and Dialogue. Edited by Ruslan Mitkov. Oxford University Press, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199276349.013.0007.

Full text
Abstract:
This article introduces the linguistic subdiscipline of pragmatics and shows how this is being applied to the development of spoken dialogue systems — currently perhaps the most important applications area for computational pragmatics. It traces the history of pragmatics from its philosophical roots, and outlines some key notions of theoretical pragmatics — speech acts, illocutionary force, the cooperative principle and relevance. It then discusses the application of pragmatics to dialogue modelling, especially the development of spoken dialogue systems intended to interact with human beings in task-oriented scenarios such as providing travel information and shows how and why computational pragmatics differs from ‘linguistic’ pragmatics, and how pragmatics contributes to the computational analysis of dialogues. One major illustration of this is the application of speech act theory in the analysis and synthesis of service interactions in terms of dialogue acts.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

Rushdy, Ashraf H. A. Private Apologies. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190851972.003.0009.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter discusses two philosophical approaches to understanding the dynamics and work of private apologies: either as performative speech acts or as remedial exchanges. Drawing on the writings of J. L. Austin, an ordinary language philosopher, and Erving Goffman, a sociologist, this chapter examines the different ways of conceiving of apology as an illocutionary act, that is, an utterance that performs an action, or as a rehabilitative ritual, involving bodily gestures and facial expressions in addition to the utterance itself. It then explores how these theories from the 1950s and 1960s can shed light on contemporary writers on apology who wish more dogmatically to identify the categorical features of an apology.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. Sentence Types. Edited by Jan Nuyts and Johan Van Der Auwera. Oxford University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591435.013.8.

Full text
Abstract:
“Declarative,” “interrogative,” and “imperative” are grammatical labels, while “statement,” “command,” and “question” describe type of speech act. The major sentence types correspond to these types, and are found in every language. There are also minor, less well-described types, such as exclamatives. Boundaries between sentence types are not water-tight. A command can be phrased using a statement, or as a question, with a difference in illocutionary force. A question may imply a statement rather than seeking information or pronounced with command intonation, and then be understood as a plea, a request, or an order. The versatility of sentence types is often rooted in cultural conventions and strategies of “saving face.” Speech acts reflect numerous communicative tasks, and can be mapped onto the sentence types in a specific way. The number of sentence types in a given language is finite, while the number of potential communicative tasks can be open-ended.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Sorensen, Roy. Stoic Silencing of Insults. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198828310.003.0014.

Full text
Abstract:
“A gentleman will not insult me, and no man not a gentleman can insult me.” This enthymeme, widely attributed to Frederick Douglass, suggests a strengthening of the Stoic claim that no insult can disturb the tranquility of the sage. Instead of shielding the Stoic, virtue disarms the assailant attempting the insult. Un-insultability comports better with the Stoic’s concern for the moral welfare of others—even those who mean you harm. The feminist analysis of illocutionary silencing suggests a plausible mechanism for this stronger interpretation. Accordingly, Stoic counsel on insults is reinterpreted in light of J. L. Austin’s theory of speech acts.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

Yalcin, Seth. Expressivism by Force. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198738831.003.0015.

Full text
Abstract:
There is on the one hand the traditional speech act-theoretic notion of illocutionary force, and there is on the other hand the kind of notion of force we have in mind when we are theorizing in formal pragmatics about conversational states and their characteristic modes of update. These notions are different, and occur at different levels of abstraction.They are not helpfully viewed as in competition.The expressivist idea that normative language is distinctive in force can be developed in two sorts of directions, depending on which of the two senses of ’force’ is emphasized. I suggest expressivists do better to take the path stressing conversational update: they do better to start with the idea that normative discourse is distinctive in respect of its dynamic effect on the state of the conversation.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Anderson, Luvell. Calling, Addressing, and Appropriation. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198758655.003.0002.

Full text
Abstract:
What explains the difference in black and non-black use of the n-word? In the mouths of black speakers the n-word can take on friendly, or at least benign significance. This chapter will be concerned with providing an explanation. First, it will present three accounts—i.e., the Ambiguity thesis, an Expressivist account, and an Echoic account, ultimately arguing that none of them is satisfactory. Next, it introduces the concepts of a speech community and a community of practice and explicates their roles in in-group uses. It concludes with a distinction between calling and addressing, introduced by Geneva Smitherman, to explain the specific illocutionary act undertaken by in-group members that allows for endearing or neutral uses of slurs and argues that membership in the relevant community of practice licenses one to access the relevant illocution.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography