Academic literature on the topic 'Inferential references'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Inferential references.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Inferential references"
Kokoszka, Piotr. "Dependent Functional Data." ISRN Probability and Statistics 2012 (October 16, 2012): 1–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/958254.
Full textGil-Egui, Gisela, William F. Vásquez, Alissa M. Mebus, and Sarah C. Sherrier. "The Environment as Part of the E-Government Agenda." International Journal of Electronic Government Research 7, no. 2 (April 2011): 78–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/jegr.2011040105.
Full textParini, Alejandro, and Anita Fetzer. "Evidentiality and stance in YouTube comments on smartphone reviews." Internet Pragmatics 2, no. 1 (May 20, 2019): 112–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/ip.00025.par.
Full textRobles, Jessica S. "Misunderstanding as a resource in interaction." Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 27, no. 1 (February 6, 2017): 57–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/prag.27.1.03rob.
Full textIftitah, Nurlaili, I. Wayan Widiana, and Alexander Hamonangan Simamora. "Think Talk Write Assisted Monopoly Media in Students' Simple Essay Writing Skills." Journal of Education Technology 4, no. 2 (July 2, 2020): 195. http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jet.v4i2.25144.
Full textFrana, Ilaria, and Paula Menéndez-Benito. "Evidence and Bias: The Case of the Evidential Future in Italian." Semantics and Linguistic Theory 29 (December 23, 2019): 727. http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/salt.v29i0.4629.
Full textKoné, Kadidja. "Exploring the Impact of Performance-based Assessment on Malian EFL Learners’ Motivation." Advances in Language and Literary Studies 12, no. 3 (July 1, 2021): 51. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.12n.3.p.51.
Full textKwon, Iksoo. "I Guess Korean Has More Mirative Markers: -Napo and -Nmoyang." LSA Annual Meeting Extended Abstracts 1 (May 2, 2010): 20. http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/exabs.v0i0.499.
Full textMcCullagh, Mark. "Inferentialism and Singular Reference." Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35, no. 2 (June 2005): 183–220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2005.10716587.
Full textRadiafilsan, Christian. "PENGARUH PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT (POS) TERHADAP KOMITMEN ORGANISASI SMA NEGERI DI KOTA PALANGKA RAYA." Equity In Education Journal 1, no. 1 (October 20, 2019): 48–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.37304/eej.v1i1.1552.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Inferential references"
Salazar, Ferro Gabriela. "Étude de l'importance de la dynamique culturelle et des croyances dans la construction des empires : le cas des Romains et des Incas." Thesis, Montpellier 3, 2013. http://www.theses.fr/2013MON30020.
Full textComparisons between Incas and Romans first started by 16th century Spanish chroniclers. We ail to highlight how Roman past and origins have been the bastion for European power justification and how Roman history and ideals became a cultural pattern. We suggest that Cuzco was stereotyped by European imaginary. As so, we chose to take an interest in mythical tricksters and their part in defining social boundaries. This leads to critical thinking on the way political power was perceived. We conclude that similar but not identical symbols were mobilized by Incas and Romans
Books on the topic "Inferential references"
Pearce, Kenneth L. Reference and Quasi‐Reference. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198790334.003.0006.
Full textWilson, Mark. A Second Pilgrim’s Progress. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198803478.003.0009.
Full textBook chapters on the topic "Inferential references"
Stapor, Katarzyna. "Descriptive and Inferential Statistics." In Intelligent Systems Reference Library, 63–131. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45799-0_2.
Full textGil-Egui, Gisela, William F. Vásquez, Alissa M. Mebus, and Sarah C. Sherrier. "The Environment as Part of the E-Government Agenda." In E-Government Services Design, Adoption, and Evaluation, 184–200. IGI Global, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2458-0.ch011.
Full textSchmid, Hans-Jörg. "The routinization of pragmatic associations." In The Dynamics of the Linguistic System, 269–85. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198814771.003.0014.
Full textMillikan, Ruth. "Embedding Language in the World." In Singular Thought and Mental Files, 251–64. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198746881.003.0012.
Full text"really what was at issue, so much as the means by which the inevitable outcome would be accomplished, and it is precisely those means which are problematized by the riddle structure. As usual, the answer is provided retrospectively and within the dramatic frame, but in this case the solution involves the introduc tion of new ‘facts’ of which the reader has hitherto been quite unaware. That night, in their prison cell, Theagenes and Charikleia talk over the day’s remarkable events. Charikleia suddenly remem bers a dream vision of her now dead mentor Kalasiris that had visited her the previous night and delivered this prophecy: If you wear pantarbe fear-all, fear not the power of flame Miracles may come to pass; for Fate ’tis easy game. (8.11.2) The solution to the riddle is itself a riddle, which Charikleia elucidates for her sceptical beloved: thinking she was about to die, she had secreted about herself the recognition tokens left her by her mother, including a ring set with the jewel called pantarbe and engraved with mystic characters. This, she surmises, protected her from the fire (8.11.7-8). Heliodoros’ manipulation of his narrative is obvious. Any ‘honest’ writer would have narrated this self-evidently important dream in its proper chronological place. The postponement is half heartedly explained within the dramatic frame by the suggestion that Charikleia simply forgot about it, but this is only for form’s sake.8 Heliodoros is deliberately withholding information, to induce puzzlement and speculation, to encourage the reader to take, in Umberto Eco’s notorious phrase, ‘inferential walks’. In comparison with the other riddles we have discussed, this one may seem adversarial rather than collaborative. Rather than slowly releasing material which will guide the reader safely to the correct solution, Heliodoros’ aim appears to be to keep us in the dark until such time as it suits him to tell us something we could not have otherwise known. But, although the author is playing more roughly here, he is still observing the rules: the clues are there, though probably their significance is realized only in retrospect. As Charikleia goes to face trial, intending to denounce herself and find release from the torment of her existence, Helio doros duly records that she wore her recognition tokens ‘as a kind of burial shroud, fastened around her waist beneath her clothes’ (8.9.8). And this reference to the tokens takes us back, across half." In Greek Literature in the Roman Period and in Late Antiquity, 324. Routledge, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203616895-39.
Full text"existing code correlating a whistle with the information that now is the moment to attack. The information is obvious enough: it is the only information that A could conceivably have intended to make manifest in the circumstances. Could not the repetition of such a situation lead to the development of a code? Imagine that the two prisoners, caught again, find themselves in the same predicament: again a whistle, again an escape, and again they are caught. The next time, prisoner B, who has not realised that both guards are distracted, hears pris-oner A whistle: this time, fortunately, B does not have to infer what the whistle is intended to make manifest: he knows. The whistle has become a signal associ-ated by an underlying code to the message ‘Let us overpower our guards now!’ Inferential theorists might be tempted to see language as a whole as having developed in this way: to see conventional meanings as growing out of natural inferences. This is reminiscent of the story of how Rockefeller became a million-aire. One day, when he was young and very poor, Rockefeller found a one-cent coin in the street. He bought an apple, polished it, sold it for two cents, bought two apples, polished them, sold them for four cents . . . After one month he bought a cart, after two years he was about to buy a grocery store, when he inherited the fortune of his millionaire uncle. We will never know how far hominid efforts at conventionalising inference might have gone towards establishing a full-fledged human language. The fact is that the development of human languages was made possible by a specialised biological endowment. Whatever the origin of the language or code employed, a piece of coded behaviour may be used ostensively – that is, to provide two layers of information: a basic layer of information, which may be about anything at all, and a second layer con-sisting of the information that the first layer of information has been intentionally made manifest. When a coded signal, or any other arbitrary piece of behaviour, is used ostensively, the evidence displayed bears directly on the individual’s intention, and only indirectly on the basic layer of information that she intends to make manifest. We are now, of course, dealing with standard cases of Gricean communication. Is there a dividing line between instances of ostension which one would be more inclined to describe as ‘showing something’, and clear cases of communica-tion where the communicator unquestionably ‘means something’? One of Grice’s main concerns was to draw such a line: to distinguish what he called ‘natural meaning’ – smoke meaning fire, clouds meaning rain, and so on – from ‘non-natural meaning’: the word ‘fire’ meaning fire, Peter’s utterance meaning that it will rain, and so on. Essential to this distinction was the third type of communi-cator’s intention Grice mentioned in his analysis: a true communicator intends the recognition of his informative intention to function as at least part of the audi-ence’s reason for fulfilling that intention. In other words, the first, basic, layer of information must not be entirely recoverable without reference to the second. What we have tried to show so far in this section is that there are not two distinct and well-defined classes, but a continuum of cases of ostension ranging from ‘showing’, where strong direct evidence for the basic layer of information is provided, to ‘saying that’, where all the evidence is indirect. Even in our very." In Pragmatics and Discourse, 158. Routledge, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203994597-29.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Inferential references"
Guo, Shenggang, Zhiling Yuan, Fenghe Wu, Yongxin Li, Shaoshuai Wang, Shunshun Qin, and Qingjin Peng. "TRIZ Application in Bionic Modeling for Lightweight Design of Machine Tool Column." In ASME 2018 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/detc2018-85516.
Full text