Dissertations / Theses on the topic 'Insolvency proceedings'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 dissertations / theses for your research on the topic 'Insolvency proceedings.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse dissertations / theses on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
Wee, Meng Seng. "Contracts and corporate insolvency proceedings." Thesis, University of Oxford, 2002. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.249894.
Full textStavjaník, David. "Valuation of companies in insolvency proceedings." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2011. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-142204.
Full textLunetti, Chiara. "Actions deriving directly from insolvency proceedings and closely linked with them under regulation EU 2015/848 on insolvency proceedings." Thesis, Paris 1, 2020. http://www.theses.fr/2020PA01D011.
Full textThe thesis, entitled "Actions deriving directly from insolvency proceedings and closely linked with them under regulation EU 2015/848 on insolvency proceedings", focuses on the criteria for determining the courts having jurisdiction for disputes arising in the context of cross-border Insolvency proceedings. According to its Article l(l)(b), insolvency proceedings are excluded from the scope of Regulation (EU) 1215/2012 ('Brussels Regulation') and should be covered by Regulation (EU) No 848/2015 ('EIR). For this reason, in principle, the interpretation of the two regulations should, as far as possible, fill in the regulatory gaps between the two instruments. The text of the new Article 6 EIR now provides that any action with cross-border elements that prove to be 'directly deriving from Insolvency proceedings and closely linked with them' must be attracted to the jurisdiction of the Member State opening the insolvency procedure under Article 3 EIR. Nevertheless, this principle (referred to as the 'reduced' vis attractiva concursus), despite some clarifications provided by the European Court of Justice, does not resolve the issue, and the interpretation of the scope of application of the Insolvency Regulation and the Brussels Regulation's remains questionable, as there are still many grey zones in the interpretation of this rule. The aim of the thesis is to analyse what kind of actions should be regarded as 'directly deriving from' and 'closely linked with' insolvency proceedings, and to analyse those cases where it is controversial whether the action should fall within the scope of the EIR rather than the Brussels Regulation
LUNETTI, CHIARA TERESA MARIA. "ACTIONS DERIVING DIRECTLY FROM INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS AND CLOSELY LINKED WITH THEM UNDER REGULATION EU 848/2015 ON INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS." Doctoral thesis, Università degli Studi di Milano, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/2434/710018.
Full textHistorically, the topic of individual actions directly deriving from and closely linked with insolvency proceedings (hereinafter referred to as “Annex Actions”) has been addressed in the European scenario with reference to the scope ratione materiae of the Brussels Convention dated 1968 on the jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (the “Brussels Convention”). In the absence (at that time) of Community rules on cross-border insolvencies, in the Gourdain judgment the ECJ interpreted the notion of Annex Actions under the prism of the exception relating to “bankruptcy, proceedings relating to the winding-up of insolvent companies or other legal persons, judicial arrangements, compositions and analogous proceedings”, set forth by Article 1(2)(2) Brussels Convention. It was on that occasion that the Court held that actions which are related to insolvency proceedings are excluded from the scope of the Brussels Convention (now the Brussels 1a Regulation), with the proviso that they derive directly from insolvency proceedings and are closely linked with them (thus coining what has been called, over the years, the “Gourdain Formula”). The interpretative uncertainties arising from such an ambiguous wording - at the time referring only to the scope of application of the Brussels Convention - were not removed (and possibly were even exacerbated) by the introduction of the European regime on insolvency proceedings. Indeed, the Regulation (EC) 1346/2000 (the “Insolvency Regulation”), on the one hand, revealed a serious regulatory gap, since it did not provide for a rule on the jurisdiction of Annex Actions and, on the other hand, even where it mentioned them (for purposes other than jurisdiction), it laconically restated the Gourdain Formula, with no further clarifications. The nebulous legislative framework described above has been partly clarified by Regulation (EU) 2015/848 (the “Recast Regulation”), which has remedied the aforementioned omission, expressly providing for the (halved) European vis attractiva concursus. According to that principle, the courts of the Member State in the territory of which insolvency proceedings are opened, are vested with the jurisdiction to hear and determine Annex Actions. The impact of the reform over the “dynamic” profile of the vis attractiva concursus must be positively assessed since it has dispelled many of the doubts concerning the allocation of jurisdiction on Annex Actions. Yet, the problem of the autonomous definition of Annex Actions remains partially unsolved, because also under the Recast Regulation, the contours of that concept continue to be defined by the vague Gourdain Formula. Only partial indications can be drawn from Recital 35 Recast Regulation and, above all, from the extensive case-law of the ECJ. The latter, however, allows only to some extent to draw a systematic notion of Annex Actions, as it substantially reveals a wavering orientation, which does not permit to trace (yet) a general criterion, certain and shared on this point. It is suggested that, for the purposes of the European legislation, Annex Actions are those actions underpinning a right or obligation which stems from the opening of insolvency proceedings, whose DNA, we might say, is ontologically linked to insolvency proceedings. They would count a very small number of actions such as (predictably) avoidance actions, liability actions against the trustee and other bodies of the procedure, and actions arising from the termination of contracts exercised by the trustee by virtue of the express powers conferred upon him by insolvency law. On the contrary, all other actions in respect of which the procedure is a neutral (legal) event should not be characterised as Annex Actions (e.g. actions that have only an occasional link with insolvency proceedings and those that existed in the legal sphere of the insolvent debtor prior to the opening of the procedure). However, considerable doubts remain with respect to the characterisation of some actions, which can be placed in an uncertain twilight-zone at the crossline between civil, commercial law and bankruptcy law. Although the legal foundation of those action exists even before insolvency proceedings, they prove to be affected by the opening of the procedure to such an extent that they may be considered as different actions. In the wake of these preliminary observations, the thesis aims to specifically analyse the topic of Annex Actions under the European regime of cross-border insolvencies. Not only it investigates the procedural aspects of the issue (in particular, the jurisdiction), but it also assesses whether it is possible to draw an autonomous notion of Annex Action and elaborate a catalogue of actions, which, despite the differences inherent in each national system, reveal a jus commune europaeum that allows to trace them back under the umbrella of the Recast Regulation.
La thèse intitulé « les actions qui découlent directement de la procédure d’insolvabilité et qui y sont étroitement liées dans le cadre du Règlement UE 2015/848 sur les procédures d'insolvabilité » se concentre sur les critères de détermination des juridictions compétentes en matière de litiges découlant de la procédure d’insolvabilité dans le contexte de procédures transfrontalières. Selon son Article 1(1)(b), les procédures d’insolvabilité sont exclues du Règlement (UE) n° 1215/2012 concernant la compétence judiciaire, la reconnaissance et l’exécution des décisions en matière civile et commerciale (« Règlement Bruxelles ») et devraient relever du champ d’application du Règlement (UE) n° 848/2015 relatif aux procédures d’insolvabilité (« Règlement Refondu »). Pour cette raison, en principe, l’interprétation de deux susmentionnés Règlements devrait, autant que possible, combler les lacunes entre les deux instruments. Le texte du nouvel article 6 du Règlement Refondu prévoit désormais que les juridictions compétentes en vertu de son article 3 soient compétentes également pour toutes les actions qui découlent directement de la procédure d’insolvabilité et y sont étroitement liées. Toutefois, ce principe (appelé la vis attractiva concursus européenne), malgré quelques clarifications ont été fournies par la Cour de Justice, ne résoudre pas la question et l’interprétation du champ d’application du Règlement Refondu par rapport au Règlement Bruxelles est encore douteuse, car il y a encore beaucoup de zones grises dans l’interprétation de cette règle. L'objectif de la thèse est d'analyser quel type d'actions doit être considéré comme « découlant directement » et « étroitement lié » aux procédures d'insolvabilité, et d'analyser les cas où il est controversé de savoir si l'action doit entrer dans le champ d'application du Règlement Refondu plutôt que dans celui du Règlement Bruxelles.
Omar, Paul J. "The private international law of insolvency with emphasis on the European regulation on insolvency proceedings." Thesis, University of Sussex, 2002. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.249117.
Full textVeder, Paul Michael. "Cross-border insolvency proceedings and security rights : a comparison of Dutch and German law, the EC insolvency regulation and the UNCITRAL model law on cross-border insolvency /." Utrecht : Kluwer legal publ, 2004. http://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb41063898b.
Full textEC = European communauty, UNCITRAL = United Nations. Commission on international trade law. Résumé en néerlandais. Bibliogr. p. 449-468.
Beránek, Jaromír. "Insolvency Law in the Czech Republic and in the USA: Comparison of Reorganization Proceedings of Kordárna and General Motors Corporation." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2011. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-72686.
Full textBennephtali, Johanna. "Le nantissement de créance et les procédures collectives." Thesis, Paris Est, 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2019PESC0004/document.
Full textPledges over receivables have long been neglected by actors of the economy because of its inadequate legal system. But since the order from March 23rd, 2006 and the new provisions regarding security it implemented, the consistent, appropriate and flexible system has become more attractive for creditors.In practice however, the current provisions are too imprecise to reassure the involved parties who remain uncertain and insecure in their litigations.This uncertainty increases when creditors need to ensure that their security is efficient, i.e. when launching collective insolvency proceedings against the grantor.Indeed, the debtor has become more protected with each alteration of bankruptcy proceedings law which seeks to keep companies active. To that end, creditors’ rights have been greatly restricted: they are subjected to collective discipline and cannot continue paying their receivables.In this context, it appears necessary to study pledges over receivables to ascertain if said security can work for the secured creditor in case of collective insolvency proceedings against the grantor.We shall demonstrate that the efficiency of pledges over receivables depends directly on the rights it gives to the creditor, such as notifying the security and granting exclusive right of payment of the secured receivable. However, this guarantee can only become one of the most protecting securities if these rights are also granted in case of collective proceedings.By examining how pledges over receivables and the right they grant work, we can highlight the possibility for the secured creditor to exercise and keep their exclusive right of payment, even after the opening judgment; thus confirming the efficiency of the pledge over receivables
Plzáková, Nikol. "Pohledávky v insolvečním řízení – povinnosti insolvenčního správce." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2015. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-205119.
Full textSmeliková, Petra. "Insolvenční řízení: konkurs versus reorganizace." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2011. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-124951.
Full textGalajdová, Mária. "Analýza príčin a dôsledkov insolvencie spoločnosti Saab." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2013. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-191934.
Full textZahradníková, Lenka. "Institut "Úvěrové financování" v insolvenčním řízení." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2012. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-162969.
Full textBartošová, Petra. "Průběh insolvenčního řízení v České republice." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2011. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-114171.
Full textЖительний, М. Д., Людмила Дмитрівна Руденко, Людмила Дмитриевна Руденко, and Liudmyla Dmytrivna Rudenko. "Щодо особливостей провадження у справах про неплатоспроможність фізичних осіб." Thesis, Сумський державний університет, 2020. https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/79011.
Full textKovář, Ondřej. "Úspěšná vs. neúspěšná reorganizace." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2017. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-359048.
Full textTušková, Barbora. "Konkurs jako forma řešení úpadku s praktickým příkladem firmy Z plus M TRADING s.r.o." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2015. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-201577.
Full textBejčková, Radka. "Přepodklady úspěšné reorganizace firmy - MOTORPAL, a.s." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2017. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-359115.
Full textTomková, Anna. "Postavení věřitelů v konkurzu." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2010. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-75075.
Full textSkukauskas, Simonas. "Jurisdikcijos klausimai pagal Tarybos reglamentą (EB) Nr. 1346/2000 dėl bankroto bylų." Master's thesis, Lithuanian Academic Libraries Network (LABT), 2011. http://vddb.laba.lt/obj/LT-eLABa-0001:E.02~2011~D_20110207_105905-71287.
Full textCouncil Regulation 1346/2000 on Insolvency Proceedings is the outcome of forty years of efforts to harmonize the rules regarding the jurisdictional issues on cross-border insolvency in the context of European Union. By combining the two models of international insolvency proceedings – universality and territoriality – the Regulation provides different jurisdictional rules on cross-border insolvency proceedings depending on whether the main insolvency proceedings or the secondary insolvency proceedings are going to be opened. The Master thesis deals with the content of the category determining the jurisdiction to open the main insolvency proceedings, i.e. the centre of main interests. As a result the Thesis concludes that the Regulation does not provide the explicit content of the centre of main interests’ category. Therefore it encourages the different interpretation and application of Regulation’s provisions related to the opening the main insolvency proceedings by the courts of Member States. Regulation deals with issue regarding the jurisdictional conflicts by determining the priority rule under which the judgment opening the insolvency proceeding should be automatically recognized in all other Member States from the time that it becomes effective in the State of the opening of proceedings. Master thesis deals with the issues regarding the seeking to obtain a more favorable legal position (forum shopping). The Author concludes that on of the main aims of this Regulation –... [to full text]
Valíček, Jan. "Úpadkové trestné činy." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2011. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-150140.
Full textBézert, Adrien. "Les effets de l'extension de la procédure collective pour confusion des patrimoines." Thesis, Montpellier, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017MONTD051.
Full textExtending a collective insolvency procedure in the case of estate compels a number of debtors to comply with a unique collective procedure. Recent reforms have deeply modified the nature of this mechanism: for a long time perceived as a sanction, it is now used as a simple tool for restructuring, and to an extent a tool for protection. Its consequences were once dreaded, whereas now they are coveted. This thesis enhances the complementarity that exists between the latter when dealing with situations of estate confusion and offers several solutions enabling foreseeability. Furthermore, it opens up to several lines of thoughts that can correlate cases when resorting to this mechanism to the particularly original effects generated by the latter
Badaras, Mindaugas. "Įmonių bankroto proceso ypatumai Lietuvoje ir užsienio valstybėse." Master's thesis, Lithuanian Academic Libraries Network (LABT), 2006. http://vddb.library.lt/obj/LT-eLABa-0001:E.02~2006~D_20060310_092123-53880.
Full textThe process of bankruptcy is the separate part of the civil process, and is distinguished by an object’, the process participants’, the case hearing stages’ particularity and by the exceptional purposes. In the Republic of Lithuania, the main purpose of the process of bankruptcy is liquidation, i.e., direction to the legal end of the enterprise. In the scientific work, there is presented analysis of the laws, which are regulating the process of bankruptcy in the Republic of Lithuania, and their application in the judicial practice, when bankruptcy cases are heard, also, is fulfilled the comparative analysis on the urgent questions of the laws, which regulate the process of bankruptcy in the Republic of Lithuania and in the foreign countries, having an aim to define the purposes of the process of bankruptcy in Lithuania, the gaps of legal regulation, the mistakes of judicial practice, and to offer possible solutions of the above-mentioned problem matters.
Štelcl, Jakub. "Oceňování majetkové podstaty a věřitelských nároků dlužníka v úpadku." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2017. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-359540.
Full textBezuchová, Alena. "Finanční analýza podniků následně procházejících konkurzem." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2011. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-114084.
Full textSobotová, Dana. "Reorganizace společnosti podle americké právní a účetní úpravy." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2015. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-262375.
Full textPařezová, Kateřina. "Insolvenční řízení z pohledu povinností insolvenčního správce." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2011. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-85771.
Full textŠmídová, Stanislava. "Rozbor finanční situace podniku a řešení insolvence v účetnictví." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2010. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-72025.
Full textOssagou, Diane Loïca. "Arbitrage et procédures collectives." Thesis, Toulouse 1, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017TOU10059.
Full textThe purpose of the thesis is to deal with the meeting between arbitration and collective proceedings. It is organized around a triple statement. At first, marked by a strong imperialism, considerations of public order, the opening of a collective procedure is not without incidence on the arbitration bodies in course and on the arbitration bodies which have not yet started . The public order of collective proceedings has an impact both on the conduct of the arbitral proceedings and on the outcome of the arbitral award.Secondly, arbitration, which is marked by the will of the parties, contractual freedom, survives despite the opening of a collective proceeding. Indeed, the public order of the collective proceedings is not sufficient to exclude arbitration. The arbitrator's jurisdiction is upheld for all disputes that are not born of the collective proceeding and over which the latter has no legal influence. Lastly, persists during the meeting between arbitration and collective proceeding, a post-arbitration litigation
Caklová, Karolína. "Příčiny vyhlášení insolvenčního řízení s následným úpadkem." Master's thesis, Vysoké učení technické v Brně. Fakulta podnikatelská, 2009. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-391875.
Full textClivaz, Gabrielle. "La notion de centre des intérêts principaux : Réflexion à partir du Règlement CE 1346/2000 du 29 mai 2000 relatif aux procédures d’insolvabilité." Thesis, Montpellier 1, 2013. http://www.theses.fr/2013MON10033/document.
Full textIn the era of globalisation and permanent growth of trade between States, the matter of cross-border insolvency has become an issue of choices at the heart of a system that shows multiple failures. The market rules are no longer governed by a territory or a State, but truly by an economic area that extends far beyond the borders of France. The EC regulation 1346/2000 on insolvency proceedings that came into effect on the 31st of May, 2002 is the first achievement on this matter for the European Union. It apprehends cross-border insolvency while successfully articulating both the universal and territorial proceedings as well as binding jurisdiction with the applicable substantive law. The lex fori concursus with its universal scope is designated by the sole criterion of applicable jurisdiction for initiating the main procedure of insolvency: the debtor's centre of main interests. As an autonomous and undeniably central concept, it has no settled definition. The understanding of the centre of main interests concept which supposedly coincides with the registered office for the legal person debtor, has been put in the hands of Court over the years. Such definition is still not covered in Article 2 of the 1346/2000 regulation. However, this turns out to be an advantage on an international dimension when the concept of centre of main interests tends also to be considered on a world-wide basis
Peterková, Vendula. "Finanční analýza podniků procházejících insolvenčním řízením v České republice." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2017. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-359571.
Full textLIN, HSIN-HUI, and 林欣慧. "The Balance of the Interests in Insolvency Proceedings." Thesis, 2016. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/00770921361858978164.
Full text東吳大學
法律學系
104
There are different types of interests, whether the public interests or the private interests, come together at insolvency proceedings. In order to solve the conflict, the bankruptcy law shall be measured by a variety of interests and priorities to make a choice. This article will introduces the interests involved in the insolvency proceedings, methods to measure the benefit, the legislative principles and the rule of law policy. And then, this article will classify the system or event which is involving interests balance in insolvency proceedings, and analysis based on current bankruptcy law, consumer insolvency law, judicial decisions, draft law, foreign legislation and so on. In the part of selecting proceedings is not a conflict of interest, but a neutrality benefit type. The applicant choose the most appropriate procedure at will, and for the balance of the applicant abuse of rights, thus have compulsory process for conversion provisions. But in the practical operation of the bankruptcy case, because of exemption, the court strictly limit the opening of insolvency proceeding. And consumer insolvency operation, due to the rehabilitation get a higher proportion of the exemption ruling, which led to the number of applications is higher than the liquidation. In the type of private interest conflict and the creditor take precedence, mainly reflected in confirmation of property of estate of debtor and preservation of the debtor's assets. Property of estate is debtor's liability basis, so how to ensure the debtor’s right to living and the maximum repayments is the main issue. And in the part of the debtor's property preservation, not only the conflict between the private interests of the debtor and the creditor, but also relates to the security of transactions which is thought of public interest. For revocation system, is the best weapon to prevent debtor selling off property, but at the same time also a change in the existing state of the transaction, thereby affecting the public interest. And in the type of private interests conflict, priority to the protection of the debtor which mainly show in debtor exemption. Current bankruptcy law adopt disclaimer of course, if the debtor fulfill all insolvency proceedings, regardless of the amount of repayment. But in the consumer insolvency proceeding and the draft have been changed to adopt exemption ruling, the court have to review whether the debtor exempt or not. In the type of private interest and public interest conflict, which show in distribution of debtor’s assets. There are necessary fee for the operation of insolvency proceedings which was for the overall interests of the creditor, thus the fee should be paid first.
Dvořáková, Tereza. "Uplatňování pohledávek v insolvenčním řízení." Master's thesis, 2021. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-446162.
Full textPařízek, Petr. "Determinanty uspokojenosti pohledávek v insolvenčních řízeních v České republice." Master's thesis, 2017. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-267702.
Full textVacková, Kateřina. "Postavení insolvenčního správce v insolvenčním řízení." Master's thesis, 2014. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-327773.
Full textChen, Hsin-Chia, and 陳新佳. "The Obligations and Responsibilities of Directors and Supervisors in Corporate Insolvency Proceedings." Thesis, 2012. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/15114060518089405225.
Full text國立中正大學
財經法律學研究所
100
In recent years, due to the frequent occurrence of the financial crisis, the worlds realize that the integrity of the bankruptcy legal system is a key link in the financial reform and the economic stability. In the bankruptcy law of Taiwan, the amendment of bankruptcy law and the announcement of the draft of insolvency law, cooperate with the internationals trend and the social change, are the important indicator in the financial reform. Furthermore, it’s the core of the reform to complete the corporate insolvency procedures. In the corporate insolvency proceeding, besides implementing the preservation of debtor's property has to ensure the creditor to obtain the fair defray, chasing the directors and supervisors' responsibility in bankruptcy proceeding is also the focus of amending of the corporate insolvency proceeding. For this issue, it is divided into proceeding and substance way: In proceeding way, did the director have a duty and liability to creditors, when the company is insolvent or in the zone of insolvency? In the substance way, there are two provisions: the draft of insolvency law (article 174) with filling system and the civil code (article 35) impose a compulsory insolvency filling obligation on the corporate director, comparing the above, which one could achieve the purpose of carrying out obligation and examining responsibility of the director? For the above, this thesis start from the insight of directors' fiduciary duty. Besides the provisions of law of Taiwan, it also focus on the basic type of the theory of the directors duty. Moreover, this thesis also comparison and analysis each provision, which chases the responsibility in corporate bankruptcy proceedings with its characteristic and appropriateness in Taiwan’s law, of directors and supervisors. Throughout the above discussion, this thesis will reveal some thinking view to impetus the complete of Insolvency Law and increase the appropriateness of fiduciary duty, in the bankruptcy proceedings of directors and supervisors in Taiwan Law.
Nel, Imo-Rhesa. "The impact of the National Credit Act 34 of 2005 on insolvency proceedings." Thesis, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/10210/12643.
Full textWhen a debtor runs into financial problems and starts neglecting to satisfy his financial obligations as and when they fall due, there are various statutory procedures or remedies available to both the debtor and his creditor(s). The first and most obvious remedy available to the creditor is to demand the satisfaction of the outstanding claim by the issuance of a letter of demand, followed by a summons and subsequent court proceedings in which the creditor will claim what is due to him. If the debtor still neglects to satisfy the judgement debt, the creditor may proceed to have the judgement enforced by means of a warrant of execution in terms of which the debtor’s property will be attached and be sold at a public auction. Another procedure that is available is for either party to apply for a sequestration order in terms of the Insolvency Act.3 The Insolvency Act provides for two ways in which a debtor’s estate may be sequestrated. These two ways have their own separate requirements. The two ways are: 1. Voluntary surrender; and 2. Compulsory sequestration.
Hlaváčková, Kateřina. "Institut reorganizace v českém a anglickém právu a jeho použití v praxi." Master's thesis, 2017. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-358620.
Full textValtr, Tomáš. "Insolvenční správce a jeho úloha v insolvenčním řízení." Master's thesis, 2020. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-411476.
Full textHriníková, Eliška. "Insolvenční správce v případě řešení úpadku konkursem." Master's thesis, 2017. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-267026.
Full textZouchová, Barbora. "Práva a povinnosti insolvenčního správce v konkursu." Master's thesis, 2012. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-305519.
Full textŠtefeček, Ondřej. "Postavení věřitelů v insolvenčním řízení." Master's thesis, 2012. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-307536.
Full textHradílková, Pavla. "Právní úprava reorganizace." Master's thesis, 2013. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-329319.
Full textMráčková, Monika. "Postavení insolvenčního správce v oddlužení." Master's thesis, 2020. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-411472.
Full textKadlec, Tomáš. "Insolvenční návrh a jeho zneužití." Master's thesis, 2016. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-347652.
Full textŠerák, Martin. "Mezinárodní insolvenční právo." Master's thesis, 2016. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-349172.
Full textBistárová, Eva. "Majetková podstata v insolvenčním řízení." Master's thesis, 2020. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-411471.
Full textMarian, Daniel. "Majetková podstata v insolvenčním řízení." Master's thesis, 2016. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-353719.
Full textMánek, Václav. "Majetková podstata v insolvenčním řízení." Master's thesis, 2018. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-389249.
Full textISRAEL, Jona. "European cross-border insolvency regulation : a critical appraisal of Council Regulation 1346 2000 on insolvency proceedings in the light of a paradigm of cooperation and a Comitas Europaea." Doctoral thesis, 2004. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/4661.
Full textExamining board: Prof. Christian Joerges (supervisor), European University Institute ; Prof. Ian F. Fletcher, University College London ; Prof. Marie-Ange Moreau, European University Institute ; Prof. Peter von Wilmowsky, University of Erfurt
PDF of thesis uploaded from the Library digitised archive of EUI PhD theses completed between 2013 and 2017
This dissertation presents a comprehensive analysis of the regulation of cross-border insolvencies in Europe. Council Regulation 1346/2000 on Insolvency Proceedings forms the natural focal point of such a study. However, while this book explores in detail the background, legal basis as well as the substance of the Regulation, it also contains an examination of the Regulation from two wider perspectives: that of international cross-border insolvency regulation and Community law. The approach adopted by the Regulation to the problems raised by cross-border insolvency forms part of a paradigmatic shift at the global level. The ‘struggle over jurisdiction’ - the natural state of affairs under the old principles of ‘universality & territoriality’ – is increasingly being replaced by co-operation between the jurisdictions involved. The Regulation must be understood against the backdrop of these new cooperative approaches, including the UNCITRAL Model Law and ancillary proceedings. Doing so, this dissertation argues that the co-operative framework of the Regulation is limited and may ultimately not suffice to realise the efficient and effective cross-border proceedings it is aiming for. Although the Regulation is an exponent of this global shift towards cooperation, the legal context in which it operates is nevertheless very different. Community law, as an autonomous legal order, has limited the private international law autonomy of Member States and generated a comitas Europaea. This dissertation argues that Community law and its comitas must be taken seriously. They are an important source of principles to guide courts in the interpretation and application of the Regulation and may reinforce and expand the co-operative mechanisms of the Regulation.