Academic literature on the topic 'Intellectual property systems'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Intellectual property systems.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Intellectual property systems"
Rejas-Muslera, Ricardo, Elena Davara, Alain Abran, and Luigi Buglione. "Intellectual Property Systems in Software." International Journal of Cyber Warfare and Terrorism 3, no. 1 (January 2013): 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/ijcwt.2013010101.
Full textSeville, Catherine. "I. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY." International and Comparative Law Quarterly 60, no. 4 (October 2011): 1039–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0020589311000480.
Full textNelson, Richard R. "Intellectual Property Protection for Cumulative Systems Technology." Columbia Law Review 94, no. 8 (December 1994): 2674. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1123153.
Full textMontenegro, Claudia. "Promoting innovation through intellectual property protection systems." International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management 3, no. 1/2 (2003): 126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/ijeim.2003.002224.
Full textLacy, Jack, Schuyler Quackenbush, Amy Reibman, and James Snyder. "Intellectual property protection systems and digital watermarking." Optics Express 3, no. 12 (December 7, 1998): 478. http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/oe.3.000478.
Full textOmorov, R. O. "Intellectual property and artificial intelligence." E-Management 3, no. 1 (May 20, 2020): 43–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.26425/2658-3445-2020-1-43-49.
Full textWhite, Michael. "World Intellectual Property Organization." Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship 8, no. 1 (February 2002): 71–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/j109v08n01_08.
Full textBech, Soeren. "Nonchalant about intellectual property protection?" Infosecurity 4, no. 2 (March 2007): 40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1754-4548(07)70045-1.
Full textAllarakhia, Minna, and Anthony Wensley. "Innovation and intellectual property rights in systems biology." Nature Biotechnology 23, no. 12 (December 2005): 1485–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt1205-1485.
Full textLeisten, Susanna, Terry Flew, and Greg Hearn. "Alternative Intellectual Property Systems for the Digital Age." Media International Australia 114, no. 1 (February 2005): 87–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1329878x0511400111.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Intellectual property systems"
Berardi, Christopher W. (Christopher Walter). "Intellectual property and architecture : how architecture influences intellectual property lock-in." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/112005.
Full textThis electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.
"June 2017." Cataloged from student-submitted PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (pages 237-247).
Intellectual property lock-in is a wicked problem particularly pervasive under monopsony market structures, such as the Department of Defense (DoD). However, little research exists on the mechanisms of action that induce intellectual property lock-in. This work postulates the conjuncture of architecture and intellectual property is one such mechanism of action and erects a research methodology to investigate this link. This dissertation began with a review of literature, which revealed more research is needed into basic trends or estimates of magnitude for intellectual property lock-in. To quantitatively frame the magnitude of the problem an investigation was conducted into all DoD contracts for the last eight fiscal years to establish bounds. These results were used to formulate a conceptual model of the problem and suggest the concept of intellectual property architecture, which is the conjuncture of architecture and intellectual property. To investigate links between intellectual property architecture and lock-in, an intermediate-N fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis research approach was formulated and executed using 14 DoD software cases representing over 34 million lines of code. The model used three input conditions: high quality technical architecture, accessible intellectual property architecture, and unlimited rights to study the avoidance of lock-in. The fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis concluded intellectual property architecture or unlimited rights were quasi-necessary conditions for the avoidance of lock-in. Additionally the model yielded both a five condition conservative expression and two condition parsimonious expression for sufficient conditions. From those expressions, this research concludes three direct findings. First, intellectual property architecture is an empirically supported mechanism of action for the avoidance of lock-in. Implying, intellectual property architecture, absent any other explanatory conditions, is sufficient to avoid lock-in. Second, the research herein finds evidence to support a novel taxonomy of intellectual property architectures. Allowing practitioners to understand potential trade-offs between architecture and intellectual property lock-in. Third, intellectual property architecture or unlimited rights is a theoretically supported expression for the avoidance of lock-in. This finding implies that as few as two conditions are required to understand whether a case may, or may not, avoid lock-in.
by Christopher W. Berardi.
Ph. D. in Engineering Systems
Ahuja, Rishi. "Intellectual property : strategy and policy." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/76923.
Full textCataloged from PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (p. 70-73).
The thesis that follows is an attempt to gain a deeper understanding of intellectual property from a policy as well as a strategic perspective. While the discussion that follows is applicable to intellectual property in general, the focus of this thesis is on a particular aspect of intellectual property i.e patents. Policy and strategic perspectives are covered in section I and 11 respectively. The section on policy explores the origin and evolution of intellectual property related policies by discussing key legislation and court cases. The two questions that were most relevant when exploring the policy side of the patent system were: -- Is the intellectual property system hindering or encouraging innovation? -- What changes, if any, are required to make the system more effective? The section on strategy looks at IP strategies (or lack thereof) of three leading companies, Apple, Google and Microsoft. These three companies were selected because of their apparently differing strategies and this cursory judgement was confirmed when the strategies of the companies were put under a microscope. The question that were central while exploring the strategic aspects of intellectual property were: -- How are these three companies coping with the patent system as it exists today? -- What changes can make the strategies employed more effective? The summary section at the end tries to reconcile these two different ways of looking at the intellectual property system into a coherent whole.
by Rishi Ahuja.
S.M.in Engineering and Management
Bauer, Julia, Nikolaus Franke, and Philipp Türtscher. "Intellectual Property Norms in Online Communities: How User-Organized Intellectual Property Regulation Supports Innovation." INFORMS, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.2016.0649.
Full textKumar, Vishal S. M. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. "Software industry in India : product and intellectual property focus." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/67561.
Full textCataloged from PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (p. 103-105).
India has established itself well as a powerhouse of talent in Information Technology (IT)/Software services, indicated by its exports of USD 54.33 Billion in 2010. Established in 1980s by the late Mr. Rajiv Gandhi, Prime Minister of India at that time, the focus on education and IT has paid rich dividends for the next generation. While a lot has been achieved by Indian entrepreneurs when it comes to software services, the same cannot be said about the Software Product segment which has remained out of focus so far. This is evident from the fact that Software Product based exports have remained less than 2% of the overall IT/Software industry exports so far. Many reasons are obvious and have been well studied in the past, while some are not very obvious and are less well explored. Using this thesis as an opportunity, an attempt has been made to explore these reasons, and some recommendations have been shared for architecting an ecosystem that can help foster Software Product and Intellectual Property (IP) focus.
by Vishal Kumar.
S.M.in Engineering and Management
McMullin, Nathan K. (Nathan Keith) 1979. "Value creation through intellectual property acquisition." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/99013.
Full textThesis: S.M., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Engineering Systems Division, 2015. In conjunction with the Leaders for Global Operations Program at MIT.
Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (pages 91-93).
After Sanofi acquired intellectual property (IP) from bankrupt Pelikan Technologies it desired to leverage the IP to identify a product concept to enhance the company's portfolio. To facilitate the project, a structured opportunity identification process was utilized. This process consisted of four major steps: Problem Framing, Idea Search, Screen, and Refine. Problem Framing formulated the innovation challenge. Idea Search sourced over two dozen potential opportunities that spanned markets and industries. Using a tournament selection approach, the Screen step filtered the opportunities according technical and strategic objectives. This selected an integrated blood measurement device as the opportunity of focus. This leverages the IP to simplify at-home blood testing while simultaneously reducing pain. The Refine step evaluated the opportunity using a framework that assessed markets, product, competitiveness, economics, and risk. The beachhead market is the diabetes market and potential follow-on markets are oncology, multiple sclerosis, rare diseases, and cardio-metabolic diseases. Key technology elements were assembled into a variety of conceptual approaches and evaluated according to market fit. This identified a conceptual approach that integrates all disposable elements (i.e. lancet and blood test element) into a single disposable cartridge that can be inserted into an electronically actuated meter. The projected financial returns in the beachhead market have a positive nominal NPV. NPV sensitivity was calculated based on estimated cost and revenue item variations. In all cases the NPV remains positive, but this highlighted key drivers of economic performance along with risks that need to be resolved in future development work. With key assumptions identified, Sanofi is in an excellent position to decide whether or not to pursue the identified opportunity. In addition, this project acts as a pilot for a structured opportunity identification process within the company and it is recommended that Sanofi adopt a similar process as part of its product development workflow. Finally, the company should adjust resources and financial commitment to ensure full cross-functional teams can be staffed to execute opportunity identification work. These improvements will enable the company to more effectively execute corporate entrepreneurial activities.
by Nathan McMullin.
M.B.A.
S.M.
Gora, Michael Arthur. "Securing Software Intellectual Property on Commodity and Legacy Embedded Systems." Thesis, Virginia Tech, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/33473.
Full textMaster of Science
Monngakgotla, Oabona C. "Policy makers knowledge and practices of intellectual property rights on indigenous knowledge systems in Botswana." Pretoria : [s.n.], 2007. http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-07222008-123004/.
Full textHoye, Katherine. "University Intellectual Property Policies And University-Industry Technology Transfer In Canada." Thesis, University of Waterloo, 2006. http://hdl.handle.net/10012/2855.
Full textEmpirical research, chiefly conducted in the United States, has explored the link between the incentives that are governed by IP policies and various outcomes and found that financial incentives are correlated with a variety of outcomes. This research extends the literature by exploring the same underlying relationship, in Canada, where IP policies also determine ownership and control of the development of the IP; some universities retain control over the development and other universities let the ownership and control vest with the inventors.
The research question was pursued by conducting three studies, each of which provided a different perspective. The first study seeks to explain cross-institutional patterns in the numbers of patents held by Canadian universities using variables that represent the financial incentives and control offered to faculty inventors by the universities' policies. The second study investigated the impact of a policy change at the University of Toronto, using interrupted time series analysis techniques. The third study investigated the experiences of faculty inventors at the University of Waterloo through indepth interviews and thematic analysis of the resulting qualitative data.
The first, cross-sectional study failed to generate statistically significant results. In the second, longitudinal study, the change from a "university-owns" to an "inventor-owns" policy appeared to have significantly and substantially increased the number of invention disclosures submitted to the University of Toronto by its faculty members. The third, qualitative study suggests that faculty members interpret the incentives governed by intellectual property policies and that this interpretation is shaped by group norms, academic leadership, university culture and the inventors' experiences with technology transfer support organizations. Therefore, Studies 2 and 3 indicate that university intellectual property policies are effective levers with which to stimulate university-industry technology transfer and thus deserve further study. The importance of university factors in Study 3 implies that intellectual property policies must fit with their organizational contexts in order to be productive.
This research also has important policy implications. Many governments have been attempting to emulate the American Bayh-Dole Act by introducing or changing national regulations affecting university IP policies. This research suggests that these national regulations may actually depress researcher support for technology transfer and thus the amount of activity at those institutions that would benefit from an alternate policy. In effect, standardization of university IP policies through national regulations may deprive university administrators of an effective lever for encouraging technology transfer on their campuses. This inference will be the focus of further research which will broaden the work documented in this dissertation by exploring the relationship between university IP policies, university-industry technology transfer, and university factors, including culture, across a wider range of universities.
Gonzalez, Muriel Eugenia. "The effects of intellectual property on innovation : implications for R&D in biotechnology." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/59679.
Full textCataloged from PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (p. 75-80).
The effects of Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) on innovation in the field of biotechnology are considered through assessment of their effects on upstream innovation and downstream development. Two case studies involving research tools representing forms of upstream innovation are analyzed to identify factors enabling or hindering downstream innovation. The proprietary technologies of recombinant DNA (rDNA) and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) are assessed in relation to both their development and their diffusion strategies. Factors considered are: the type of IPRs, legal circumstances, the strategy regarding disclosure, whether a basic research exemption exists, enforcement of IPRs, the invention's characteristics, the economic resources available (private vs. public), and the development setting. Assessment of these cases requires consideration of the current intellectual property regime and its associated problems. These principally include the importance of the context (including the legal framework), the strategy adopted by the owners of the IPRs regarding diffusion, the type of development setting, and the invention's characteristics. Ways of dealing with these issues within the traditional IPR systems are assessed, such as patents and trade secrets, for which corresponding types of licenses can provide solutions. Additionally, new approaches are assessed, such as patent pools, clearinghouses, open source models, liability regimes, experimental use exemption, and compulsory licensing. These alternatives are considered both in the United States and under different international regimes. Finally, the potential policy implications of IPRs, both in the United States and internationally, are evaluated with regard to their effects on innovation in biotechnology.
by Muriel Eugenia Gonzalez.
S.M.in Technology and Policy
Cantuaria, Patricia Lucia Martins Cardoso. "Using Sui generis systems and biopartnerships to provide protection for plant genetic resources : a balance of stakeholder interests, rights and duties; case study Brazil." Thesis, University of Nottingham, 2000. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.364443.
Full textBooks on the topic "Intellectual property systems"
Monzur, Anis Uddin. Intellectual property law and land information systems. London: PEL, 1991.
Find full textThumm, Nikolaus. Intellectual property rights: National systems and harmonisation in Europe. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag, 2000.
Find full textTalbott, James N. New media: Intellectual property, entertainment, and technology law. New York: Clark Boardman Callaghan, 1997.
Find full textInformation technology for intellectual property protection: Interdisciplinary advancements. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference, 2012.
Find full textQu, Gang. Intellectual property protection in VLSI designs: Theory and practice. Boston, Mass: Kluwer Academic, 2003.
Find full textMoore, Adam D. Intellectual property & information control: Philosophic foundations and contemporary issues. New Brunswick, N.J: Transaction Publishers, 2001.
Find full textLefa, Thamae, and Phaqane Mofihli, eds. Analysis of traditional healers in Lesotho: Implications on intellectual property systems. Nairobi, Kenya: African Technology Policy Studies Network, 2012.
Find full textRöwer, Thomas. Programmable intellectual property modules for system design by reuse. Konstanz: Hartung-Gorre, 2000.
Find full textIntellectual property and information control: Philosophic foundations and contemporary issues. New Brunswick, N.J: Transaction Publishers, 2004.
Find full textDhar, Biswajit. Sui generis systems for plant variety protection: Options under TRIPS : a discussion paper. Geneva: Quaker United Nations Office, 2002.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Intellectual property systems"
Yang, Deli. "Intellectual Property Systems." In Understanding and Profiting from Intellectual Property in International Business, 39–69. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54034-0_3.
Full textMuthukrishnan, Lakshmipathy, and Sathish Kumar Kamaraj. "Disruptive Nanotechnology Implications and Bio-Systems – Boon or Bane?" In Intellectual Property Issues in Nanotechnology, 143–62. First edition. | Boca Raton : CRC Press, 2020.: CRC Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781003052104-11.
Full textLacy, Jack, Schuyler R. Quackenbush, Amy Reibman, and James H. Snyder. "Intellectual Property Protection Systems and Digital Watermarking." In Information Hiding, 158–68. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-49380-8_12.
Full textLando, Darya D., and Maryia V. Miashchanava. "Strengthening Intellectual Property Rights and Blockchain Technology." In Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 1532–40. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69415-9_169.
Full textCeglarek, Dariusz, Konstanty Haniewicz, and Wojciech Rutkowski. "Semantically Enhanced Intellectual Property Protection System - SEIPro2S." In Computational Collective Intelligence. Semantic Web, Social Networks and Multiagent Systems, 449–59. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04441-0_39.
Full textDelgado, Jaime, Isabel Gallego, Silvia Llorente, and Roberto García. "Regulatory Ontologies: An Intellectual Property Rights Approach." In On The Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2003: OTM 2003 Workshops, 621–34. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39962-9_65.
Full textTrumpke, Felix. "Effects and Potential of Extended Collective License Systems." In MPI Studies on Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 85–100. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53809-8_5.
Full textHilty, Reto M., and Tao Li. "Control Mechanisms for CRM Systems and Competition Law." In MPI Studies on Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 157–76. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53809-8_9.
Full textZhang, Xue. "Review of Agricultural Intellectual Property and Agricultural Science and Technology." In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 82–89. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43309-3_11.
Full textHahanov, Vladimir. "12 Infrastructure Intellectual Property for SoC Simulation and Diagnosis Service." In Design of Digital Systems and Devices, 289–330. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17545-9_12.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Intellectual property systems"
Kadim, H. J. "Robust parameter identification for virtual test of systems on a chip." In IEE Seminar on Intellectual Property. IEE, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/ic:20000409.
Full textKnechtel, Johann, Satwik Patnaik, and Ozgur Sinanoglu. "Protect Your Chip Design Intellectual Property." In COINS '19: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OMNI-LAYER INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3312614.3312657.
Full textRajendran, Jeyavijayan J. V. "An overview of hardware intellectual property protection." In 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS). IEEE, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iscas.2017.8050883.
Full textNeretin, Oleg P. "Intellectual property competencies for librarians’ professional development." In Twenty Fourth International Conference "Information technologies, computer systems and publications for libraries". Russian National Public Library for Science and Technology, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.33186/978-5-85638-231-9-2020-97-100.
Full textWei, Jiang, and Xiaolei Kong. "A framework to analyze different intellectual property systems." In EM). IEEE, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ieem.2010.5674445.
Full textKepa, Krzysztof, Fearghal Morgan, and Krzysztof Kosciuszkiewicz. "Intellectual property protection in self-reconfigurable embedded systems." In 2009 International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE). IEEE, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icce.2009.5012373.
Full textAlspaugh, Thomas A., Hazeline U. Asuncion, and Walt Scacchi. "Intellectual Property Rights Requirements for Heterogeneously-Licensed Systems." In 2009 17th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE). IEEE, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/re.2009.22.
Full textLi, Xueming, and Zhiyuan Wang. "Patent Property Appraisal Discussion in the Transaction Process of Intellectual Property Rights." In 2009 International Workshop on Intelligent Systems and Applications. IEEE, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iwisa.2009.5073003.
Full textPotkonjak, Miodrag, Gang Qu, Farinaz Koushanfar, and Chip-Hong Chang. "20 Years of research on intellectual property protection." In 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS). IEEE, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iscas.2017.8050602.
Full textGoodwin, John, and Peter Wilson. "Power analysis detectable watermarks for protecting intellectual property." In 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems - ISCAS 2010. IEEE, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iscas.2010.5537191.
Full textReports on the topic "Intellectual property systems"
Lacy, Jack, Schuyler R. Quackenbush, Amy Reibman, and James H. Snyder. Intellectual Property Protection Systems and Digital Watermarking. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, April 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada385324.
Full text