To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Interlingual homonyms.
Journal articles on the topic 'Interlingual homonyms'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 23 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Interlingual homonyms.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
Kezina, Svetlana V. "Interlingual homonymy as a way of expressing formal content asymmetry." Neophilology, no. 24 (2020): 699–708. http://dx.doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2020-6-24-699-708.
Full textAbstract:
We analyze Slavic interlingual cognate-homonyms in terms of content. The aim of the study is to explore the process of semantic deviations of modern words with initially common etymon and to reveal the reasons of such deviations. The main methods of linguistic research are comparative, comparative-historical and component analysis. The problem of Slavic interlanguage homonymy is connected, on the one hand, with the globalization of communication, as the result of which the importance of linguistic comparative analysis is increased in modern language study, and, on the other hand, it is connected with the division of the Slavic world, which makes the revival of the Slavic historical roots urgent. The novelty of the research is due to the systematic approach to the study of cognate-homonyms. The optimal system for studying homogeneous homonyms is the diachronic field. We reveal that the foundation of the diachronic fields’ evolution, which supplied the material of Slavic interlingual cognate-homonyms, is continual generating of polysemants, the consecutive one being modeled on the basis of the prototype generated by the previous. We substantiate that semantic deviation in modern words with a common etymon and consequently the formation of homonyms is determined by the split of a polysemant in the process of breaking classificational and associative connections which define its integrity, and subsequent actualization of polysemantic complexes (fragments) and separate meanings. We conclude that it is possible to use the study results in etymological research in the reconstruction of prototypes and original polysemy as a source of late homonymy.
2
Andrishko, Oleh. "Ukrainian-Rumeika interlingual homonyms and paronyms." Philological Review, no. 2 (December 5, 2021): 165–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.31499/2415-8828.2.2021.246101.
Full textAbstract:
The article deals with intermittent homonyms and paromies in the Ukrainian and Rumeika.
In 2019, the United Nations announced the International Year of Languages of Indigenous Peoples, and 2022–2032 – an International Decade of Languages of Indigenous Peoples. Rumeika is one of the languages of Greeks of Pryazovia – the indigenous people of Ukraine. Under the terms of the Kuchuk-Carnadzhi Peace Treaty of 1774 between the Ottoman and Russian Empire, the Crimean Khanate became independent. This and the decree of Catherine II caused a wave of the relocation of the Greeks in the Pryazovia. Rumeika has close ties with Modern Greek, while the other language of the Greeks of Pryazovia – Urum – is close to the Crimean Tatar language. For a long time, Rumeika did not have written writing, while in the twentieth century, the efforts of A. Biletskyi for the alphabet developed on the basis of Cyrillic. Despite the fact that in the 20th century Rumeika was an important ethno-forming factor, now it is in a threatening state primarily due to the influence of the Russian language.
Ukrainian and Rumeika languages are in close contact, therefore, the emergence of a large number of inter-digit homonyms and parones. Also, the research of Rumeika is important in view of the fact that it is in front of the disappearance, as well as in geopolitical terms through new social challenges to the population of Ukraine.
The purpose of the article is to find out the peculiarities of the Ukrainian-Rumeika homonyms and paromies, which involves the following tasks: the creation of a dictionary; explaining the values of words; determination of features of inter-life homonyms and paromies in the case of Ukrainian and Rumeika languages.
3
Lackova, Marta, and Eva Lelakova. "Interlingual Homonyms of Polysemic Origin in Related Languages." Communications - Scientific letters of the University of Zilina 16, no. 3 (July 31, 2014): 29–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.26552/com.c.2014.3.29-35.
Full text
4
Chról, Emil. "INTERLINGUAL HOMONYMS AND PARONYMS IN BULGARIAN AND RUSSIAN LANGUAGES." Zeszyty Cyrylo-Metodiańskie 3 (December 8, 2014): 106. http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/zcm.2014.0.1.106.
Full text
5
Kusal, Krzysztof. "Формальные и семантические сближения в сфере русско-польской межъязыковой омонимии." Studia Rossica Posnaniensia 46, no. 1 (May 5, 2021): 101–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/strp.2021.46.1.8.
Full textAbstract:
This article deals with the issue of structural and semantic relationships in the area of Russian-Polish interlingual homonymy, such as exclusion, inclusion, and hybridization. The analysis of Russian-Polish homonymous doublets made it possible to specify two basic reasons for the differences in meaning of the lexemes in both languages: semantic divergence of the words with a common etymon (disintegration of polysemy) and phonetic convergence. The study revealed that interlanguage Russian-Polish correspondences with a partial coincidence of lexical meanings make up the largest group of interlanguage homo-pairs. The types of semantic relations described at the word level do not exhaust the variety of semantic relations between Russian-Polish interlanguage homonyms. The depth of meaning development is another theoretical problem of modern lexicology and lexicography. In addition to the semantic differences between Russian-Polish homo-pairs, there may be more complex relationships. They are observed in cases where stylistic and functional discrepancies are layered on semantic inconsistencies. The differences in pragmatic significance are the most significant and can form the subject of independent study.
6
Rutkowski, Krzysztof. "Interlingual Polish-Russian homonyms and paronyms – a proposal of classification." Studia Wschodniosłowiańskie 12 (2012): 305–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.15290/sw.2012.12.23.
Full text
7
Faško, Ivan. "Ortograficzne i ortoepiczne zróżnicowanie słowacko-serbskich aproksymatów międzyjęzykowych." Studia z Filologii Polskiej i Słowiańskiej 51 (December 31, 2016): 58–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.11649/sfps.2016.005.
Full textAbstract:
Orthographic and orthoepic diversity of Serbo‑Slovak interlingual approximatesThe paper is a presentation of the results of a qualitative formal analysis of different types of Serbo-Slovak interlingual approximates (false friends, interlingual homonyms). In his earlier research on Serbo-Slovak approximation, the author of this paper defined the appropriate terminology and the meaning of the notions similar and identical in terms of quantitative analysis. The results of the study are based on lexical material containing 266 pairs of Serbo-Slovak approximates. They have been classified into four groups – interlingual homonyms, homophones, homographs and paronyms. We found that the differences between approximates are similar in their nature within the groups they were classified into. The existence of these types of differences is possible due to the presence of numerous spelling principles in the Slovak orthography – which features a combination of the phonetic, morphological, grammatical and etymological principles. In the Serbian language, the phonetic principle is the only one consistently present, and the morphological principle can be seen only in a few exceptions. Orthoepic differences are closely related to the orthographic ones. In addition, we can distinguish other kinds of differences which result from a different etymological development or are accidental. Comparing and understanding differences gives a comprehensive and clear view of the formal differentiation of Serbo-Slovak interlingual approximation. Ortograficzne i ortoepiczne zróżnicowanie słowacko‑serbskich aproksymatów międzyjęzykowychW niniejszym artykule zaprezentowane zostały wyniki analizy jakościowej pojedynczych rodzajów serbsko-słowackich aproksymatów międzyjęzykowych (wyrazów zdradliwych, homonimów międzyjęzykowych) pod względem ich formy. Autor w swoich wcześniejszych badaniach nad aproksymacją serbsko-słowacką zajął się zdefiniowaniem odpowiedniej terminologii i ustaleniem znaczenia pojęć podobny i identyczny za pomocą analizy ilościowej. Wyniki badań opierają się na materiale leksykalnym liczącym 266 par serbsko-słowackich aproksymatów. Zaklasyfikowano je do czterech grup – homonimy, homofony, homografy oraz paronimy międzyjęzykowe. Okazało się, że różnice między aproksymatami mają podobny charakter w zależności od tego, do której z grup aproksymaty zostały zaklasyfikowane. Pojawienie się tych różnic wynika z istnienia kilku zasad ortograficznych w pisowni języka słowackiego – połączenie zasady fonetycznej, morfologicznej, gramatycznej oraz etymologicznej, podczas gdy w języku serbskim obecna jest tylko zasada fonetyczna, morfologiczną można zauważyć w kilku wyjątkach. Różnice ortoepiczne są ściśle powiązane z ortograficznymi. Oprócz tego wskazać można takie różnice, które wynikają z odmiennego rozwoju etymologicznego lub są przypadkowe. Porównanie i poznanie różnic daje możliwość pełniejszego spojrzenia na formalne zróżnicowanie serbsko-słowackich aproksymatów międzyjęzykowych.
8
Kaleta, Radosław. "O wybranych polsko-białoruskich homonimach międzyjęzykowych w polsko-wielojęzycznym słowniku fałszywych przyjaciół tłumacza." Acta Polono-Ruthenica 3, no. XXIV (September 30, 2019): 7–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.31648/apr.4657.
Full textAbstract:
This paper shows the project of the Polish-Multilingual dictionary of False Friends of a Trans-lator. Such kind of a dictionary has never been made before. It is the first project of a dictionary of this type, including numerous examples from 14 languages. Some Polish-Belarusian interlingual homonyms have been described in detail in the article.
9
Akhmedova, Mastura N., Ramil T. Yuzmukhametov, Iles M. Abrorov, Inessa G. Beloglazova, and Azim Bayzoev. "Lexical Features of Interlingual Homonyms in Modern Persian, Dari and Tajik." Journal of History Culture and Art Research 8, no. 3 (October 1, 2019): 234. http://dx.doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v8i3.2244.
Full text
10
Pysmennyi, T. E., A. A. Pliushchai, and M. Y. Onishchenko. "Interlingual Homonyms in Spanish and Italian: False Friends – Real Enemies of Translators." Alfred Nobel University Journal of Philology 2, no. 18 (2019): 280–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.32342/2523-4463-2019-2-18-24.
Full text
11
Poort, Eva D., and Jennifer M. Rodd. "Towards a distributed connectionist account of cognates and interlingual homographs: evidence from semantic relatedness tasks." PeerJ 7 (May 16, 2019): e6725. http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6725.
Full textAbstract:
Background Current models of how bilinguals process cognates (e.g., “wolf”, which has the same meaning in Dutch and English) and interlingual homographs (e.g., “angel”, meaning “insect’s sting” in Dutch) are based primarily on data from lexical decision tasks. A major drawback of such tasks is that it is difficult—if not impossible—to separate processes that occur during decision making (e.g., response competition) from processes that take place in the lexicon (e.g., lateral inhibition). Instead, we conducted two English semantic relatedness judgement experiments. Methods In Experiment 1, highly proficient Dutch–English bilinguals (N = 29) and English monolinguals (N = 30) judged the semantic relatedness of word pairs that included a cognate (e.g., “wolf”–“howl”; n = 50), an interlingual homograph (e.g., “angel”–“heaven”; n = 50) or an English control word (e.g., “carrot”–“vegetable”; n = 50). In Experiment 2, another group of highly proficient Dutch–English bilinguals (N = 101) read sentences in Dutch that contained one of those cognates, interlingual homographs or the Dutch translation of one of the English control words (e.g., “wortel” for “carrot”) approximately 15 minutes prior to completing the English semantic relatedness task. Results In Experiment 1, there was an interlingual homograph inhibition effect of 39 ms only for the bilinguals, but no evidence for a cognate facilitation effect. Experiment 2 replicated these findings and also revealed that cross-lingual long-term priming had an opposite effect on the cognates and interlingual homographs: recent experience with a cognate in Dutch speeded processing of those items 15 minutes later in English but slowed processing of interlingual homographs. However, these priming effects were smaller than previously observed using a lexical decision task. Conclusion After comparing our results to studies in both the bilingual and monolingual domain, we argue that bilinguals appear to process cognates and interlingual homographs as monolinguals process polysemes and homonyms, respectively. In the monolingual domain, processing of such words is best modelled using distributed connectionist frameworks. We conclude that it is necessary to explore the viability of such a model for the bilingual case. Data, scripts, materials and pre-registrations. Experiment 1: http://www.osf.io/ndb7p; Experiment 2: http://www.osf.io/2at49.
12
Besprozvanny, Vadim G. "“The Big Book of Errors” (New Collected Works of Vladimir Narbut)." Literary Fact, no. 17 (2020): 366–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.22455/2541-8297-2020-17-366-386.
Full textAbstract:
This review of the newly published book “Vladimir Narbut. Poetry. Translations. Prose” (Roman Kozhukharov, ed., Moscow, 2018) evaluates the textual criticism methods applied to this collection, reflects on the quality of the commentaries and the preface essay, and reveals a remarkable number of flaws the new edition has: the altered structure of the poetic cycles, chronological and bibliographical errors, and issues with text variants. The editor demonstrates little regard for the textual accuracy, and employs a self-contradictory strategy for the versions and drafts of the poetic texts. The commentaries that supply the book lack merely a professional approach: some are too detailed (or too telegraphic), others disconnect from the context, and some are irrelevant or misguided. The latter is particularly true for the Russian-Ukrainian interlingual homographs and homonyms, and ethnographic realia. The long-winded preface essay provides a detailed overview of the poet’s life, and is full of debatable esoteric assumptions and preposterous conclusions.
13
Klimkina, Оlga. "Associative Support in the Process of Learning Vocabulary of a Foreign Language: a Psycholinguistic Approach in Language Teaching." PSYCHOLINGUISTICS 25, no. 2 (April 18, 2019): 69–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2019-25-2-69-91.
Full textAbstract:
The subject of the article is description of the reserves for improving the efficiency of teaching foreign language vocabulary. The identification of effective strategies for mastering new words and supporting elements used in this case has been carried out taking into account the psycholinguistic theory of bilingualism as a basis for improving the theory and practice of teaching foreign languages. The illustrative part is presented by materials of the Russian lessons for students with native Turkish language.
The support is defined as a sign getting into the focus of attention and directing the search in the previous experience of the individual. Associative supports help the implementation of Association strategy in the process of memorizing a foreign word. It is suggested that if associative supports («keys» in terms of techniques) are offered at the same time with the introduction of a new verbal unit for its memorization, it will accelerate the capture of sound and graphic image of the word, ensure its introduction into long-term memory, enhance storage, simplify search and reproduction.
In order to optimize the memorization of lexical material, it is proposed to use: support on the morphemic component («familiar» roots in borrowings); support on the same sound-letter complex (interlingual homonyms); support on the language of personal meanings (etymological adaptation of the word); support on the pragmatic component (emotional-evaluative connotations of the word); support on a similar sound-letter complex («phonetic keys»); support on the grammatical analogy in the native language («positive transfer»); support on the previously formed speech skill.
The application of the strategy of association while learning vocabulary of a foreign language helps to mobilize internal resources of the memory, and is a condition for optimization of the learning process and a factor in the successful accumulation of vocabulary. The more different associative supports are involved in the process of learning a new word, the faster the memorization and the stronger the result will be.
Further methodological search in the framework of the lexical approach to language learning should be aimed at improving the teaching materials taking into account the associative principle and, in the long term, the creation of a «psycholinguistic version» of the methodological typology of vocabulary, taking into account the features of speech activity of students to learn different types of words.
14
Slaba, Oksana, Yaroslava Padalko, Olena Vasylenko, and Larysa Parfenova. "Functional Aspects of Interlingual Borrowings: Current Challenges." Arab World English Journal 12, no. 2 (June 15, 2021): 318–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no2.22.
Full textAbstract:
A particular status of the English language as the language of international communication and connections between the nearly related English and German languages resulted in the emergence of many interlingual borrowings in the Modern English and German language vocabularies. The paper aims to consider the functioning of borrowings (loanwords) in the English and German languages. To reach the aim of the research and to carry out the tasks assigned, the following methods were used: a descriptive method, the method of correlation, componential analysis and, comparative semantic analysis. The paper focuses on linguistic and extralinguistic factors of the German and English interaction. Special attention is paid to clarifying the notion of borrowing in modern linguistic science. The word-formative calques and half-calques (hybrids), which differ from ordinary lexical borrowings by using partially borrowed lexical material, are identified in addition to direct lexical borrowings in the language subsystem under study. The paper demonstrates the significant influence of English borrowings on the structural-semantic qualities of German words, on various semantic changes, as well as on the participation of loanwords in the lexico-semantic variation: synonymy, polysemy, homonymy, and antonymy. The results of the research can also be used in the teaching and learning of both languages, in the course of lexicology or linguistics.
15
Krapyva, Yu V. "INTERLINGUAL HOMONYMY AS THE BASIS FOR DESTRUCTIVE INTERFERENCE ON THE LEXICAL-SEMANTIC LEVEL." Тrаnscarpathian Philological Studies 2, no. 17 (2021): 43–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.32782/tps2663-4880/2021.17-2.8.
Full text
16
Saik, Alina. "Analysis of the Volynsko-Czech dialect from the point of view of interlingual homony." Сучасні дослідження з іноземної філології 19, no. 1 (2021): 153–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.32782/2617-3921.2021.19.153-162.
Full text
17
Pakhomova, S. "SLOVAK AND UKRAINIAN LINGUISTIC TERMINOLOGY: SEMANTIC CONTRASTS." Comparative studies of Slavic languages and literatures. In memory of Academician Leonid Bulakhovsky, no. 36 (2020): 74–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.17721/2075-437x.2020.36.07.
Full textAbstract:
Observing the use of linguistic terminology in Slovak and Ukrainian educational and scientific practice allows us to identify numerous facts of asymmetry of linguistic terms in terms of their content and form. Differences in the intra-semantic structure of linguistic terms in Slovak and Ukrainian create problems for both students and teachers, especially in the bilingual environment or in teaching Slovak / Ukrainian as a foreign language. The article presents a comparative synchronous study of Slovak and Ukrainian linguistic terms, which are actively used in scientific and educational practice. The contrasting aspect allows us to capture and describe cases of semantic contrasts of a particular part of the linguistic terminology of the compared languages. The equivalence of linguistic terms and the reasons for their existence are analyzed. Specific examples are characterized by the phenomenon of interlingual homonymy and semantic inconsistencies of common terms. The terminological asymmetry is mainly due to different classifications and different interpretations of certain phenomena present in both languages.
18
Juan Pablo, Larreta Zulategui. "Scheinäquivalente/Potenzielle falsche Freunde im phraseologischen Bereich (am Beispiel des Sprachenpaares Deutsch–Spanisch)." Yearbook of Phraseology 10, no. 1 (December 18, 2019): 113–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/phras-2019-0007.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract In comparison to the contributions that address interlingual phraseological equivalence, the number of papers about the topic of phraseological false friends is relatively low. This is probably explained by the fact that this is a marginal phenomenon from a quantitative point of view. Nonetheless, there are relevant contributions in the field of foreign German Studies. The aim of this article is, on the one hand, to discuss theoretical questions about tertium comparationis and terminology and, on the other hand, to develop a classification of the types of potential phraseological false friends. This paper must therefore be understood as a preliminary stage for applied work in the areas of foreign language teaching, (not only) bilingual lexicography and translation theory and practice. Based on a comprehensive empirical basis, the present article studies nominal, adjectival and especially verbal idioms. For the collection of both corpora and the codification of the lemmas various methods were used: the consultation of specialized dictionaries, the use of the author’s own foreign and native language competence, the search of context examples from the databases Corpus de referencia del español actual (CREA) and Deutsches Referenzkorpus (DeReKo), and the consultation of informants. Through this methodological approach, the article tackles the levels of the language system and also of the language usage. In this respect, and due to the problem of the so-called broad or complex meaning of idioms, difficulties associated with the analysis of lexicographic definitions are of particular relevance. Depending on the lexicographic sources, differences in questions such as the complexity of the definitions or the number of sememes are noticeable. On the level of meaning, componential analysis represents the theoretical framework. Thus, the semantic structures of the idioms to be compared are analyzed in order to discover to what extent the whole meaning (sememe) or some of the minimal semantic features (semes) of the units are qualitatively different or in unequal numbers. Differences can be found both at the level of monosemic units – where either (i.1) the sememes of the units to be compared is basically different, or (i.2) one or several semes of the units to be compared differ – and also at the level of polysemic units, if the form of the idiom of one language with several sememes finds an identical or similar form in the other language but the latter does not have the same sememes. The semantic analysis performed is thus the basis for the determination of the different types of semantic interferences, which can lead to communicative misinterpretations to various degrees. On the level of expression, the analysis is based on a structural-cognitive hypothesis that postulates both a figurative and a logical-abstract formal identity. The formal similarity between idioms (and other types of phraseologisms) in different languages is not rooted in the phonetic and graphical (quasi-)identity of the units to be compared, but in the identity or in the somewhat similar height of the phrase image. Beyond such a concept of lexical-figurative identity, we find a broader conception of formal equality, which is understood not only as a structural lexical-figurative identity, but also as a likeness or identity of the logical-hidden scheme beyond the image; this scheme can initiate the same idiomatic inference procedures, even if the idioms diverge figurative-lexically. A meticulous interlinguistic analysis of the phraseological false friends is only possible by means of a clear distinction between both levels of meaning and expression, which must be reflected terminologically. In this sense, we refer to the proposal of B. Wotjak, which uses the term Kongruenz to denote cases of equality of linguistic forms, as a counterpart to the term Äquivalenz on the content level, i.e. the equality on the level of meaning. The term interlingual homonymy, on the other hand, is avoided because of the special nature of formal equality between idioms.
19
Kiyko, Svitlana, and Yuriy Kiyko. "Genuszuweisungsstrategien im DaF-Unterricht." Glottotheory, August 20, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/glot-2020-2011.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractThis paper focuses on the phonetic, morphological and semantic principles determining the grammatical gender of nouns in German. Based on the experiments we established the main trends in determining the gender of the German equivalents and interlingual homonyms and the role of the interlingual and intralingual interference in this process. The results of two experiments show that Ukrainian students take into consideration suffixes of German nouns when choosing the correct gender. Phonetic or semantic gender allocation rules play a subordinate role. The interlingual interference determinates the gender choice in the target language: the gender of the mother tongue lemma interferes the selection of the gender in the foreign language equivalent. This effect appears more frequently in interlingual homonyms than in translation equivalents. A plausible interpretation of these results could be: the lemmas of two similar nouns or translation equivalents share the same concepts, the relationship between them is rather close, and the competition between the two lemmas and their genus nodes is strong and influences language production. This conclusion supports the hypothesis that both languages, the mother tongue and the foreign one, can be activated during language producing.
20
Akhmedova, Mastura N., Ramil T. Yuzmukhametov, Iles M. Abrorov, Inessa G. Beloglazova, and Azim Bayzoev. "Lexical features of interlingual homonyms in modern persian, dari and tajik." Revista EntreLinguas, August 1, 2021, e021051. http://dx.doi.org/10.29051/el.v7iesp.3.15711.
Full textAbstract:
The relevance of the researched problem is caused by the need to study the lexical features of these languages, and to show students of a real linguistic situation when studying the Persian language. The aim of the article is to consider the lexical features of interlingual homonyms in modern Persian, Dari and Tajik. The leading approach in the studying of this issue is a problem-thematic approach. The study of interlingual homonyms in terms of their features and the review of the situations in which they are used in the Persian and Tajik languages, shows the possible approaches to the description of their semantics [19, 281]. And at its queue this is a new direction in the modern Persian lexicography, which is of a great scientific benefit. The submissions of this article may be useful in the teaching of the modern Persian, Tajik, Dari languages as well as when lecturing on the lexicology and dialectology of Persian, Tajik, Dari.
21
Didenko, Natalya. "Межъязыковые омонимы в лексико-семантической группе „Религия” (на примере польского и русского языков)." Studia Rossica Posnaniensia 45, no. 2 (October 28, 2020). http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/strp.2020.45.2.17.
Full textAbstract:
The paper aims to present the types of semantic relations which hold between the interlingual homonyms existing in the semantic field of “people’s spiritual life”. The primary type of the relations among the studied lexical units is exclusion (the presence of a religious component in the semantics of a word of one of the studied languages and the lack of such a component in the other language). Because of the significant number of the examples of this type of relation, the words were divided into three thematic groups: 1) concepts (пассия – pasja), 2) objects (арка – arka), 3) people (лектор – lektor). The relation type of inclusion (with the shared religious semantics, one of the homonyms has an additional meaning related to this area) was observed in a few pairs (катафалк – katafalk). The relation type of overlapping (with the shared religious semantics, each of the homonyms has an additional meaning) in a given lexical field was not identified. No relation of overlapping in a given lexical field and only a few cases of the inclusion relation can prove that the resources of Russian and Polish homonymous words belonging to the religious theme of the Orthodox and Catholic Churches contrast with one another in quite an unobvious way. It is conditioned by both linguistic as well as cultural factors.
22
Pavlova, A. V., and A. A. Bykovskaya. "INTERLINGUAL HOMONYMY AND PARONYMY: DIFFICULTIES OF TRANSLATION (ON THE MATERIAL OF N. HORNBY’S NOVEL «ABOUT A BOY»)." BALTIC HUMANITARIAN JOURNAL 9, no. 30 (February 29, 2020). http://dx.doi.org/10.26140/bgz3-2020-0901-0042.
Full text
23
Hofmański, Wojciech. "Jak (z)rozumieć obcy język pokrewny? Słowiańska adaptacja "techniki siedmiu sit" (na materiale czesko-polskim)." Socjolingwistyka 34 (2020). http://dx.doi.org/10.17651/socjoling.34.13.
Full textAbstract:
The article is a demo version of "The Seven Sieves Technique" in its author’s adaptation to the Slavic languages family. The illustration (based on Czech-Polish material) is preceded by a theoretical introduction related to the background of research on intercomprehensiveness and methodological assumptions of the technique. "The Seven Sieves Technique" allows you to acquire the informational value of a message written in a closely related foreign language to your native one in the following steps („sieves”). Uses linguistic competences from native language extended only by elementary knowledge of interlingual analogies. It is an alternative to the classic glottodidactic process in the field of non-professional (i.e. primarily active and normative) use of a foreign language. The article refers to prior publications that have dealt with the issue of the phenomenon of inter-language communication, mutual comprehensibility and interpretation of the phenomenon of interlanguage homonymy (Hofmański 2018, 2019).