Relevant bibliographies by topics / Interpersonal Reconstructive Therapy

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters

Academic literature on the topic 'Interpersonal Reconstructive Therapy'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 7 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Interpersonal Reconstructive Therapy.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Interpersonal Reconstructive Therapy"

1

De La Torre, Jorge. "Interpersonal Reconstructive Therapy." American Journal of Psychotherapy 58, no. 2 (April 2004): 244–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2004.58.2.244.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

WETZLER, SCOTT. "Interpersonal Reconstructive Therapy: Promoting Change in Nonresponders." American Journal of Psychiatry 162, no. 3 (March 2005): 639. http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.162.3.639.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Anderson, Timothy. "Review of Interpersonal Reconstructive Therapy: Promoting Change in Nonresponders." Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training 43, no. 1 (2006): 119–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-3204.43.1.119.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Westerman, Michael A. "Comparing Interpersonal Defense Theory and Interpersonal Reconstructive Therapy and Their Views of Sharon’s Case." Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy 17, no. 1 (April 19, 2021): 63–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.14713/pcsp.v17i1.2088.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper compares the approaches to Sharon’s case presented in two articles that appear earlier in this module, my paper (Westerman, 2021a), which was based on Interpersonal Defense Theory, and the paper by Critchfield, Dobner-Pereira, and Stucker (2021a), which was based on Interpersonal Reconstructive Therapy (IRT). I begin by considering differences in general between the ways in which these two perspectives approach case formulation. I then turn to comparing the formulations of Sharon’s case based on the two perspectives. Among other things, this part of the paper contrasts IRT’s focus on copy processes and the Gift of Love with Interpersonal Defense Theory’s focus on functionalist processes that involve the temporal organization of the parts of noncoordinating defensive interpersonal patterns. The second half of the paper compares the treatment implications of the two approaches in general terms and as they relate to Sharon’s case in particular. Implications for treatment are discussed regarding both insight-oriented interventions and enacted interventions at the level of therapy relationship processes.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Critchfield, Kenneth L., Julia Dobner-Pereira, and Eliza Stucker. "The Case of Sharon Considered from the Vantage Point of Interpersonal Reconstructive Therapy." Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy 17, no. 1 (April 19, 2021): 42–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.14713/pcsp.v17i1.2087.

Full text
Abstract:
In Interpersonal Reconstructive Therapy (IRT: Benjamin, 2003/2006; 2018) a case formulation is used to tailor interventions to each patient’s unique patterns. Using the IRT lens, psychopathology is understood as reflecting attempts to adapt to current environments using maladaptive rules and values that were learned and internalized in the context of close attachment relationships. IRT identifies precise ways in which early learning shapes present experience. Additionally, the "gift of love" (GOL) hypothesis posits that motivation to repeat maladaptive ways is linked to the wish to receive love and acceptance from specific internalized attachment figures by repeating their ways and values for the patient. The IRT case formulation has been shown to be reliable and valid (Critchfield, Benjamin, Levenick, 2015). The therapy adherence measure is also reliable (Critchfield, Davis, Gunn, Benjamin, 2008) and correlates well with retention as well as reduced symptoms and rehospitalization rates (Karpiak, Critchfield, Benjamin, 2011) among "difficult to treat" patients characterized as having high levels of personality disorder, chronic and severe problems, and prior failed treatment attempts. To illustrate the case formulation process, an IRT formulation is applied to the case of a 28-year-old female patient for whom a poor outcome was documented.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Rajabi, Gholamreza, Ghasem Khoshnoud, Mansour Sodani, and Reza Khojastehmehr. "The Effectiveness of Affective-reconstructive Couple Therapy in Increasing the Trust and Marital Satisfaction of Couples With Remarriage." Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology 26, no. 1 (April 1, 2020): 114–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.32598/ijpcp.26.1.218.18.

Full text
Abstract:
Objectives: This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of affective-reconstructive couple therapy in increasing the trust in close relationships and marital satisfaction of couples with remarriage and divorce experience. Methods: This is a single-case experimental study with a non-concurrent multiple baseline design. Three distressed couples were selected from among couples with remarriage and divorce experience referred to private and government counseling centers in Ahvaz, Iran, based on inclusion/exclusion criteria using purposive sampling method during September-December 2018, They participated at eight sessions of affective-reconstructive couple therapy, once a week each 90 minutes. They completed the Trust in Close Interpersonal Relationships Questionnaire and Marital Satisfaction Scale before and after treatment, and at the follow-up period. The data analysis was conducted by using visual analysis (graph drawing), reliable change index, recovery rate formula (increase rate), and normative comparison methods. Results: Affective-reconstructive couple therapy increased the trust in close relationships and marital satisfaction in couples after treatment and at the follow-up period. Conclusion: Affective-reconstructive couple therapy, due to special attention to the couples’ past relationships and increasing their insight into the causes of distress development in relationship can increase the trust in close relationships and marital satisfaction in remarried couples with divorce experience.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Fishman, Daniel B. "Editor's Introduction: The Psychotherapy Case of "Sharon" -- A Comparative Analysis Using Contrasting Interpersonal Theories." Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy 17, no. 1 (April 19, 2021): 1–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.14713/pcsp.v17i1.2083.

Full text
Abstract:
This article is a brief orientation to the current PCSP issue, which presents and compares two contrasting, interpersonal theories—Interpersonal Defense Theory and Interpersonal Reconstructive Therapy—for developing a case formulation and treatment plan for the case of "Sharon," a 28-year, unmarried social worker with no children. At the beginning of Sharon’s therapy, which was part of a randomized clinical trial (RCT), Sharon presented with comorbid anxiety and personality disorders. A major focus of her problems was being stuck between being simultaneously drawn to and repelled by "Jeff," her former finance. In reading this article series, a number of important themes to keep in mind are mentioned, including (a) comparing theoretical similarities and differences between the two theories; (b) the differences in the information selected by each theory from the large database of quantitative and qualitative clinical information in the database generated by the RCT; and (c) the enrichment of theory that occurs when it is applied to an individual case.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Westerman, Michael A., and Kenneth L. Critchfield. "Goals and Design of the Project and Basic Information About Sharon’s Case." Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy 17, no. 1 (April 19, 2021): 5–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.14713/pcsp.v17i1.2084.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper sets the stage for subsequent papers in this set of articles, which collectively offer a comparative examination of two approaches to case formulation and treatment by examining the same case from the two theoretical perspectives. One approach is based on Interpersonal Defense Theory (e.g., Westerman, 2018, 2019), the other is Interpersonal Reconstructive Therapy (IRT, Benjamin, 2006, 2018). In this paper, we present the goals of the project and its design, which was novel in some respects. We also introduce the case by presenting basic clinical information about the patient, Sharon (pseudonym), and describing the short-term therapy approach that was employed. The concluding section introduces the subsequent papers in this set, which includes a commentary by Stanley Messer that raises fundamental methodological/philosophy of science issues about comparing the relative merits of different therapy approaches and a reply to that commentary that addresses the important questions it poses.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Westerman, Michael A. "The Case of Sharon Considered from the Vantage Point of Interpersonal Defense Theory." Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy 17, no. 1 (April 19, 2021): 19–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.14713/pcsp.v17i1.2086.

Full text
Abstract:
As part of this project comparing analyses of the case of Sharon based on Interpersonal Defense Theory (e.g., Westerman, 2018, 2019) and Interpersonal Reconstructive Therapy (e.g., Benjamin Critchfield, 2010), this paper considers the case from the vantage point of Interpersonal Defense Theory. The first half of the paper presents the theory’s novel approach to case formulation. It begins by explaining the kind of case formulations the Interpersonal Defense Theory calls for in general and then presents a formulation of Sharon’s case based on the theory, illustrating that formulation with an examination of a transcript of a session excerpt from her therapy. The second half of the paper discusses the theory’s implications for treatment, beginning with a presentation of its treatment implications in general and then turning to its specific implications for Sharon’s case. Overall, the paper shows that the theory sheds new light on how to understand Sharon’s problems, provides a possible explanation for why the treatment, which was based on Brief Adaptive Psychotherapy (Pollack, Flegenheimer, Kaufman, Sadow, 1992), resulted in a poor outcome, and suggests a different therapeutic approach that might have been more successful.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Critchfield, Kenneth L., Lorna Smith Benjamin, and Kathleen Levenick. "Reliability, Sensitivity, and Specificity of Case Formulations for Comorbid Profiles in Interpersonal Reconstructive Therapy: Addressing Mechanisms of Psychopathology." Journal of Personality Disorders 29, no. 4 (August 2015): 547–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2015.29.4.547.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Interpersonal Reconstructive Therapy"

1

Canate, Rebecca R. "Change in Group Therapy: A Grounded Theory Inquiry into Group and Interpersonal Patterns in a Community Sample." BYU ScholarsArchive, 2012. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/2986.

Full text
Abstract:
This qualitative study investigated the group process and impact of pre-group feedback information on individuals in an eight-week therapy group. The feedback information was based on group members' results on the Structural Analysis of Social Behavior (SASB) Intrex questionnaire given before the group began. The Intrex is based on Interpersonal Reconstructive Therapy (IRT) theory, which is a combination of interpersonal psychoanalysis, attachment theory, operant conditioning, and studies of imitative learning, and has been utilized primarily in an individual treatment format. Because only a limited number of treatment strategies have utilized IRT theory in the group treatment setting, and because group treatment results often rival those of individual therapy, the researcher chose to introduce IRT information into group therapy in a grounded-theory study. IRT information was given to the group leader and members mainly to inform them of patterns. They were the primary source of IRT feedback in the group sessions. The purpose of this study was to gain an in-depth understanding of the process experience of this group and the potential impact of IRT theory-based feedback-receiving on this group's therapy. Participants completed the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP) and the Outcome Questionnaire-45 (OQ-45) at specified points to provide quantitative support for qualitative analyses of group member outcomes. Therapy tapes were transcribed verbatim, watched, and analyzed by two clinical psychology students for important process themes using grounded theory methods. Two main themes were revealed during the qualitative search: 1) Group members tended to express information gained during their interview in covert ways and were highly resistant to overt discussions of early patterns; and 2) For this particular group, religious beliefs played a large role in how information was processed and the degree to which positive change occurred distilled through their struggle internalizing norms and standards.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Interpersonal Reconstructive Therapy"

1

Benjamin, Lorna Smith. Interpersonal reconstructive therapy for anger, anxiety, and depression: It's about broken hearts, not broken brains. Washington: American Psychological Association, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0000090-000.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Interpersonal Reconstructive Therapy: Promoting Change in Nonresponders. The Guilford Press, 2003.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Interpersonal Reconstructive Therapy: An Integrative, Personality-Based Treatment for Complex Cases. The Guilford Press, 2006.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Interpersonal Reconstructive Therapy for Anger, Anxiety, and Depression: It's About Broken Hearts, Not Broken Brains. American Psychological Association, 2018.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Svrakic, Dragan M., and Mirjana Divac Jovanovic. The Fragmented Personality. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780190884574.001.0001.

Full text
Abstract:
This book pioneers a new model of personality disorder primarily intended to serve mental health professionals, those already in practice and equally those in training. In contrast to the static concepts of mental normalcy and pathology, the presented nosology is dynamic (accounts for the reversibility of mental functioning) and personalized, context- and time sensitive. In a 3D diagnostic cylinder, the coordinates cross match the person’s common level of mental functioning (vertical diagnosis) with his or her behavior style (horizontal diagnosis) at a point in space and a unit of time, giving the clinician precise milestones to monitor changes in diagnosis and progress in therapy. The central problem with persons suffering from personality disorder does not rest in their extreme behaviors but rather underneath the surface, in the fragmented substrate of personality (a core deficit sine qua non shared by all individual variants), while extreme behaviors merely represent variable compensatory strategies. Based on this model, mechanism-based treatments are outlined: reconstructive interpersonal psychotherapy (a novel, integrative, transtheoretical approach which relies on psychoanalytic and humanist traditions) and mechanism-based pharmacotherapy of neurobiological vulnerabilities associated with excessive temperament traits.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Interpersonal Reconstructive Therapy"

1

Critchfield, Kenneth L., Mariafé T. Panizo, and Lorna Smith Benjamin. "Formulating Key Psychosocial Mechanisms of Psychopathology and Change in Interpersonal Reconstructive Therapy." In Case Formulation for Personality Disorders, 181–201. Elsevier, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-813521-1.00010-2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Svrakic, Dragan M., and Mirjana Divac-Jovanovic. "Psychotherapy of Personality Disorder." In The Fragmented Personality, 197–238. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780190884574.003.0005.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter reviews the therapeutic process, strategies, and goals in psychotherapy of personality disorder that have been accepted by consensus. Psychotherapy can be thought of as environmental intervention that consistently trends in the right direction, proven capable of correcting the pathogenic impact of past environments or excessive neurobiology. The correction is both mental and structural. With personality disorder, psychotherapy must be transtheoretical, integrative, and eclectic in order to meet the uniquely multicausal and multidimensional nature of the syndrome. The chapter introduces Reconstructive Interpersonal Therapy (RIT), an integrative, transtheoretical psychotherapy of personality disorder drawing from psychoanalytic, cognitive, and humanist traditions. The RIT is presented in detail, with a comprehensive review of its basic principles and tools along with a number of practical tips in everyday therapeutic work. A detailed review of empirical studies of the efficacy and effectiveness of psychotherapy in personality disorder concludes the chapter.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Wade, N., J. M. Schultz, and M. Schenkenfelder. "Forgiveness Therapy in the Reconstruction of Meaning Following Interpersonal Trauma." In Reconstructing Meaning After Trauma, 69–81. Elsevier, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-803015-8.00005-x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

"Shared formulation of functioning: enriching autobiographical memory, improving access to inner states and reconstructing schemas." In Metacognitive Interpersonal Therapy for Personality Disorders, 115–34. Routledge, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315744124-11.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Interpersonal Reconstructive Therapy' for particular source types:
Journal articles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography