Academic literature on the topic 'Investor protection system'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Investor protection system.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Investor protection system"
Kozłowski, Tomasz. "INVESTOR PROTECTION AND FINANCIAL SYSTEM STRUCTURE." Ekonomia i Prawo 2, no. 1 (December 31, 2006): 49. http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/eip.2006.002.
Full textZhang, Lin. "Undue Interference of Governments and the Dysfunctional Legal Regime for Safeguarding Investors in China." Business Law Review 41, Issue 3 (May 1, 2020): 89–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/bula2020101.
Full textde Swart, Fai. "The Use of Mailbox Companies in International Investment Protection." European Company Law 12, Issue 1 (February 1, 2015): 19–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/eucl2015004.
Full textGeller, Gabriel, and Maria João Guedes. "Political institutions and investor protection." Corporate Ownership and Control 17, no. 4, Special Issue (2020): 339–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv17i4siart11.
Full textSulistyani, Ratu Vidi, Anis Mashdurohatun, and Lathifah Hanim. "The Protection of Investor Rights in Margin Transactions By Securities Companies when Force Selling is Performed." Law Development Journal 3, no. 4 (December 31, 2021): 774. http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/ldj.3.4.774-789.
Full textLepore, Luigi, Francesco Paolone, Sabrina Pisano, and Federico Alvino. "A cross-country comparison of the relationship between ownership concentration and firm performance: does judicial system efficiency matter?" Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society 17, no. 2 (April 3, 2017): 321–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/cg-03-2016-0049.
Full textPagano, Marco, and Paolo F. Volpin. "The Political Economy of Corporate Governance." American Economic Review 95, no. 4 (August 1, 2005): 1005–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/0002828054825646.
Full textAnderson, Anne, Parveen P. Gupta, and Andrey Zagorchev. "Does a country’s financial and legal systems contemporaneously impact the governance and performance relationship: Further evidence?" Corporate Ownership and Control 9, no. 4-3 (2012): 279–308. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv9i4c3art2.
Full textTan, Wenhao, Yun Sun, Jianfeng Zhao, and Dian Sun. "Accounting firms transformation and investor protection." ITM Web of Conferences 45 (2022): 01075. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20224501075.
Full textWardhani, Ratna. "The role of investor protection in corporate governance and accounting harmonization: Cross-country analysis in Asia." Journal of Economics, Business & Accountancy Ventura 18, no. 2 (August 28, 2015): 267. http://dx.doi.org/10.14414/jebav.v18i2.453.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Investor protection system"
Sheng, Jin. "Regulating China's corporate control transactions : accountability of transition to an investor protection centered regulatory system /." Click to view the E-thesis via HKUTO View the Table of Contents & Abstract, 2010. http://sunzi.lib.hku.hk/hkuto/record/B44016438.
Full textBzovii, Alice. "The Dual role of Most-Favoured-Nation-Clause in Investment Treaty System : Treatment of Protection of Foreign Investor." Thesis, Uppsala universitet, Juridiska institutionen, 2017. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-323181.
Full textZacharčenko, Jevhenij. "Eliminace ztrát materiálu a výsledného produktu při recyklaci tvrdokovového odpadu v METAL Holding CZ s.r.o." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2012. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-162415.
Full textLöhr, Stefan Franz. "Betrügerisches Verhalten bei geschlossenen Fonds: Eine Analyse aus ökonomischer und rechtlicher Perspektive." Universitätsverlag Chemnitz, 2018. https://monarch.qucosa.de/id/qucosa%3A21414.
Full textFraudulent behavior in closed-end funds is, according to statistics, responsible for annual capital losses in the mid-triple-digit millions. Legislators have repeatedly addressed the problem in the past and initiated a large number of civil, criminal and public-law measures to improve investor protection, which reached their peak in 2013 with the entry into force of the so-called “Kapitalanlagegesetzbuch” (KAGB). The usefulness of these measures are doubted by critics, moreover it appears that a new phenomenon of 'unsanctioned fraud' on the capital market appears to be established recently, where the perpetrators succeed either without or without significant sanctions, especially in criminal matters. Examples include the Debi Select funds from Landshut and the POC funds from Berlin, in which the 'stripping pullers' operating in the background could be held accountable neither in civil nor in criminal law despite millions in damage to investors. The present work is devoted to the systematic investigation of this phenomenon by theoretically analyzing the topics '(non-sanctioned) fraudulent closed-end funds' and 'investor protection' from an economic and legal perspective and deriving recommendations for improvement, which are then confirmed and supplemented by an explorative-empirical expert survey become. Specifically, the paper answers the following central research question: 'What is fraudulent behavior in closed-end funds and why is this partially sanctionless?' And four complementary research questions: (1) 'What is the anatomy of fraudulent closed-end funds?' (2) 'What are the causes and incentive structures that favor fraudulent behavior in closed-end funds? (3)'What measures are appropriate for the prevention or the containment of fraudulent behavior in closed-end funds?' (4) 'Do civil, criminal and public legislative measures, in particular the KAGB, provide sufficient protection against fraudulent closed-end funds?'
Armanno, Maria. "Regulatory bodies in EC securities markets between self- and statutory regulation : investor protection and the new financial intermediaries; a study of the French, Italian and British systems." Thesis, University of Glasgow, 1995. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.268107.
Full textHenchiri, Hanène. "Essais sur l'incidence de l'environnement institutionnel sur les décisions financières des firmes." Thesis, Orléans, 2011. http://www.theses.fr/2011ORLE0513/document.
Full textThe imperfections of financial markets and the incompleteness of financial contracts cause commitments between firms and stakeholders to become more complex. Several solutions are suggested in order to reduce such problems and to facilitate the conclusion of financial contracts. Contracts evolve within an institutional structure, an environment by which they are conditioned. Institutions are one of many solutions to market imperfections and to contract incompleteness. Results bring out relevant effects of the financial system’s development and structure (particularly the amount of banking over market financing), banking regulation (the supervisory methods and their extent) and some characteristics of the legal systems (such as creditor protection) on investment constraints. It appears that sound and healthy institutions facilitate access to funding and strengthen the collateral required to secure bank financing. Consequently, poor quality of a country’s institutions hinders access to financing by the private sector
Rivière, Anne. "La régulation des gestionnaires de hedge funds en droit européen et américain : Enjeux et perspectives. Une étude comparée des régimes juridiques issus de la directive AIFM et du Dodd Franck Act." Thesis, Tours, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017TOUR1005.
Full textThe hedge fund industry manages several trillion dollars in assets. Though they are key players of the financial system, hedge funds remain mysterious creatures. Available only to professional or qualified investors, they managed, for a long time, to take advantage of exemptions and to avoid a heavy regulatory burden. The 2008 financial crisis profoundly changed perspectives and led the European Union and the United States to introduce new regulations targeting hedge funds, through their managers and advisers. This study is a comparative analysis of such regulations, brought about by the AIFM Directive and the Dodd Frank Act. After a brief overview of the industry, both texts are examined and compared so as to identify their respective strengths and weaknesses. Two imperatives emerged out of the crisis: increasing investor protection and preventing systemic risk. In light of these two objectives, part II discusses the validity of the reforms, their scope and their limits. This extensive analysis of hedge fund regulation also leads to broader remarks on financial regulation, its aims, contours and challenges. Finally, a roadmap for a revised version of the AIFM Directive is proposed and concrete measures are suggested, such as the total prohibition of marketing to retail investors and the creation of a global database of systemic risk
PEI-JUNG, CHEN, and 陳珮容. "The Research on The Protection System of Investor under Merger and Acquisition." Thesis, 2004. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/30820066509625725162.
Full text淡江大學
國際貿易學系
92
Corporations can use the type of external growth to expanse their business by mutual investing and merger & acquisition( M&A ).For following the trend of internationalization and improving the whole environment of corporate M&A, the related Act was legislated to suit the convenience of company’s activities from 2000 to 2003, especially the Act of corporation merger and acquisition. However, the rush nature of the legislative process cause the Act were questioned that corporations require enormous profits but neglect the main protections of investors. This thesis center on the system of protection of investors, discusses the derivated problems as enterprises proceeding their M&A activities. 1. By studying the process of corporation M&A, we can analyzes the regulations relating the process of determination of director board and the information disclosure. 2. Assembling and discussing the relating rules which can defend the rights of stockholders and creditors. 3. Examining the methods of implementing the appraisal right of minority shareholders under the M&A. 4. The due process of law that shareholders can use to request compensation as their rights damaged by the managers or directors. Through the systematic and comprehensive study, we can conclude that it is admirable that the new regulations regarding corporation M&A provide the enterprises multiple M&A models, however, there are still a lot of problems about the protection of investors should be amended. First, the inconsistency among the different Act should be modified. For example, the rules about requesting elements of appraisal rights of minority stockholders are different between The Company Law and The Act of corporation merger and acquisition. Second, directors face huge profits conflicts in it, so the legislative duty of board and supervisors should be enforced, for example, the independent board directors or supervisors need to be established. Third, the beginning day of information disclosure, the price estimation standard also have to be rule out. Finally, the elements of derivative suit of independent stockholder should be amended and enforce the system of Class Action under the Securities and Futures Investors Protection Center.
Huang, Yu-Lan, and 黃郁嵐. "A Study of the Investor Protection System: Focusing on the Securities Class Action." Thesis, 2008. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/02084268056308158083.
Full text國立臺灣大學
法律學研究所
96
With the rapid growth of financial business, securities markets not only serve the need for publicly-held corporation to raise capital but also provide invesotrs an alternative way to use capital. Since the securities are intangible property, how to prevent fraud and protect investors becomes an important issue for countries all over the world. Among all the supervisory methods, full-disclosure appears to be the most efficient way to prevent fraud. Securities fraud claims are especially suitable for class-action proceedings in that the costs of bringing securities fraud litigation are almost always greater than the losses to individual investors. Furthermore, the proof of transaction causation and loss causation and the assesment of damages are much more difficult than any other kind of law suits. The U.S.-style class action is a unique American procedural device. It allows plaintiffs to sue not only for injury them sustaine but on behalf of other persons similarly situated for injury done to them. It serves the interests of economy by not having to try the same issues again in separate cases. Also, it serves the interests of consistency and finality by avoiding the possibilities of inconsistent outcomes in separate trials of similar cases and resolving all claims in a single case that is binding on all class members. The U.S.-style class action is once considered the most powerful mechanism to enforce federal securities laws. However, the danger of vexatious litigation may also jeopardize the soundness of securities markets. In 1995, the U.S. Congress passed the Private Securites Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA)to address the concern for frivolous suits and the agency problem of plaintiff’s attorneys. Nevertheless, the scholars are still concerned about whether the class action is a good solution for securities fraud. Recent corporate scandals in Europe have affected individual investors on a large scale with similar injuries. This has led to a recent shift in the role of enforcement in several EU member states, from soley state and public consumer group enforcement mechanism to the inclusion of private enforcement. Consequently, there is a trend that more and more EU member states start to adopt the U.S.-style class action. There are other kinds of unique approach of private enforcement. Some countries use their traditional civil procedure to enforce securities fraud claims, such as Germany. The German Capital Investors Model Proceeding is said to be the express rejection of the adoption of U.S.-style class action. Still some other countries use the “nonprofit organization” to enforce securities law claims, such as South Korea and Taiwan. In Taiwan, the corporate scandals in 1998 revealed the demand for better investor protection and related law-enforcement system. Because the participants of the securities markets were mostly unsophisticated individual investors and the barrier to litigation often impeded them from entering lawsuits, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) established an Investor Services Center (ISC) under the Securities and Futures Institute to coordinate claims against public companies on behalf individual investors. Due to the court costs, the security-posting and the lack of discovery proceeding, there was still desparate need to establish the class action device in Taiwan. In 2002, the congress passed the Securities and Futures Investors Protection Act (hereinafter “SFIPA”) to establish our own securities class action device. The most unique feature of the securities class action in Taiwan is that it is not driven by attorneys but by the “Securities and Futures Investors Protection Center” (hereinafter “SFIPA”). According to the SFIPA, the SFIPC may bring an action or submit a matter to arbitration in its own name with respect to a single securities or futures matter injurious to a majority of securities investors or futures traders, after having been so empowered by not less than 20 securities investors or futures traders. The concept of this regulation is borrowed from the Consumer Protection Act, which authorizes the authority to represent class members in the court and seek compensation arising from defendants’ product liability. To date, the SFIPC has brought 50 securities class action on behalf of more than 64,000 investors, seeking more than NT$24 billion in civil damages. The SFIPC has won 9 final judgments, including securities fraud, false financial statement, false prospectus statement and insider trading. In order to strengthen investors protection, the draft of the modification of the SFIPA addresses the need for further exemption of court costs and the authority for the SFIPC to open the shareholder derivative suit and the judicial procedure to remove directors and supervisors. This thesis will first introduce the securities class action in Taiwan in chapter 2, and compare the model of the securities class action in Taiwan with other jurisdictions in chapter 3. After analyzing the main features of securities class action in different jurisdictions, this thesis will further examine that whether the securities class action in Taiwan does give investors easier access to litigation and discuss the pros and cons of the draft of modification of the SFIPC in chapter 4. Finally, this thesis will examine the overall investor protection system in chapter 5. Chapter 6 will point out the necessities of the securities class action in Taiwan and the importance of the SFIPC as the conclusion.
Manurung, Jadi Haposan. "Investor Protection in the Indonesian Securities Market: Fact or Fiction?" Thesis, 2016. https://vuir.vu.edu.au/42316/.
Full textBooks on the topic "Investor protection system"
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. The Madoff investment securities fraud: Regulatory and oversight concerns and the need for reform : hearing before the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, United States Senate, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, first session, on how the securities regulatory system failed to detect the Madoff investment securities fraud, the extent to which securities insurance will assist defrauded victims, and the need for reform, January 27, 2009. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 2009.
Find full textThe Madoff investment securities fraud: Regulatory and oversight concerns and the need for reform : hearing before the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, United States Senate, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, first session, on how the securities regulatory system failed to detect the Madoff investment securities fraud, the extent to which securities insurance will assist defrauded victims, and the need for reform, January 27, 2009. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 2009.
Find full textUnited States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Enhancing investor protection and the regulation of securities markets: Hearing before the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, United States Senate, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, first session, on examining what went wrong in the securities markets, how we can prevent the practices that led to our financial system problems, and how to protect investors, March 10, 2009. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 2009.
Find full textEnhancing investor protection and the regulation of securities markets: Hearing before the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, United States Senate, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, first session, on examining what went wrong in the securities markets, how we can prevent the practices that led to our financial system problems, and how to protect investors, March 10, 2009. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 2009.
Find full textVan Harten, Gus. The Trouble with Foreign Investor Protection. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198866213.001.0001.
Full textGebert, Alexander. Legal Protection for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises through Investor-State Dispute Settlement. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198795650.003.0012.
Full textTietje, Christian, and Kevin Crow. The Reform of Investment Protection Rules in CETA, TTIP, and Other Recent EU FTAs: Convincing? Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198808893.003.0004.
Full textGriller, Stefan. Three Salient Issues of the New Comprehensive Free Trade Agreements. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198808893.003.0014.
Full textGrosse Ruse-Khan, Henning. Intellectual Property and International Investment Agreements. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199663392.003.0007.
Full textAloysius P, Llamzon. Part III Towards a Jurisprudence Constante in Investment Arbitration Decision-Making on Corruption, 11 Concluding Chapter: Legal and Policy Tensions Underlying Anti-Corruption Decision-making. Oxford University Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198714262.003.0011.
Full textBook chapters on the topic "Investor protection system"
Goodhart, C. A. E. "Investor Protection and Unprincipled Intervention? (1987)." In The Central Bank and the Financial System, 453–57. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230379152_20.
Full textHe, Dexu. "Institutional Construction (3)—Securities Investor Protection System." In Research Series on the Chinese Dream and China’s Development Path, 191–212. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0969-3_10.
Full textKhan, Rebecca E. "Not a Third Party: Home State Participation As a Matter of Right in Investment Treaty Arbitration." In Public Actors in International Investment Law, 97–115. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58916-5_6.
Full textSadowski, Wojciech. "The Rule of Law and the Roll of the Dice. The Uncertain Future of Investor-State Arbitration in the EU." In Defending Checks and Balances in EU Member States, 333–59. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62317-6_13.
Full textCristani, Federica. "The Role of Sub-Regional Systems in Shaping International Investment Law-Making: The Case of the Visegrád Group." In Public Actors in International Investment Law, 135–53. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58916-5_8.
Full textMartín-Artiles, Antonio, Vincenzo Fortunato, and Eduardo Chávez-Molina. "Unemployment Benefits: Discursive Convergence, Distant Realities." In Towards a Comparative Analysis of Social Inequalities between Europe and Latin America, 389–417. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48442-2_13.
Full textWimmer, Nancy. "100% Electrification but What Comes Next for Bangladesh? Lessons from Insiders." In Energiepolitik und Klimaschutz. Energy Policy and Climate Protection, 53–66. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-38215-5_3.
Full textGelb, Laura, and Mohamed Ali Marouani. "Access to Social Protection by Immigrants, Emigrants and Resident Nationals in Tunisia." In IMISCOE Research Series, 363–74. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51237-8_22.
Full textSpaeth, Walter, and Tomáš Peráček. "Cryptocurrencies, Electronic Securities, Security Token Offerings, Non Fungible Tokens: New Legal Regulations for “Crypto Securities” and Implications for Issuers and Investor and Consumer Protection." In Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, 217–38. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95813-8_10.
Full textKunitskaya, Olga M. "Legal Guarantees and Protection of Investors’ Rights During the Transformation of Public Relations in the Context of the Formation of the Industry 4.0 and the Intensification of Integration Processes." In Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 1858–71. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69415-9_205.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Investor protection system"
Huang, Cao. "Research on Investor Protection System of Chinese Depositary Receipts." In Proceedings of the 2018 2nd International Conference on Economic Development and Education Management (ICEDEM 2018). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/icedem-18.2018.86.
Full textKee, Ernie, and Martin Wortman. "Nuclear Power: On PRA and Protective System Maintenance." In ASME 2021 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/imece2021-73035.
Full textIpatyev, Ivan R., and Konstantin V. Krinichansky. "Actual problems of regulation of the release and circulation of structured financial products." In Sustainable and Innovative Development in the Global Digital Age. Dela Press Publishing House, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.56199/dpcsebm.pwgl5422.
Full textCannuscio, Robert E. "Fencing in Green: Intellectual Property Protection of Developments in Sustainability and Energy Efficient Systems." In ASME 2008 2nd International Conference on Energy Sustainability collocated with the Heat Transfer, Fluids Engineering, and 3rd Energy Nanotechnology Conferences. ASMEDC, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/es2008-54306.
Full textBazone, Guna, and Janis Ievins. "Labour protection problems in new forms of employment in Latvia." In 11th International Scientific Conference „Business and Management 2020“. VGTU Technika, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/bm.2020.632.
Full textMorain, Stanley A. "Critical Infrastructure Protection Using Image Intelligence From Space-Based Aerial Sensors." In ASME 2002 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. ASMEDC, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/imece2002-32926.
Full textLi, Menghe. "Research on the Protection of Minority Investors' Rights and Interests by Special Shareholding Structure Institutional Analysis on Science and Technology Innovation Board with Registration System." In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Economy, Judicature, Administration and Humanitarian Projects (JAHP 2019). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/jahp-19.2019.72.
Full textKrupowicz, Wioleta, and Katarzyna Sobolewska-Mikulska. "Possible Applications of Spatial Analyses in Designing the Agricultural Road Network with Particular Consideration of the Environmental and Landscape Aspects." In Environmental Engineering. VGTU Technika, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/enviro.2017.208.
Full textf Švajlenka, Joze, Mária Kozlovská, and Marcela Spišáková. "GREEN AND ENERGY EFFICIENT SOLUTIONS IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY." In GEOLINKS International Conference. SAIMA Consult Ltd, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.32008/geolinks2020/b2/v2/24.
Full textZimmermann, J. R. A., J. C. Schab, A. Stankowski, P. D. Grasso, S. Olliges, and C. Leyens. "Modular Coating for Flexible Gas Turbine Operation." In ITSC2015, edited by A. Agarwal, G. Bolelli, A. Concustell, Y. C. Lau, A. McDonald, F. L. Toma, E. Turunen, and C. A. Widener. ASM International, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.31399/asm.cp.itsc2015p1078.
Full textReports on the topic "Investor protection system"
Gombeda, Matthew, Estevan Rivera, and Zoe Lallas. Optimal Approach for Addressing Reinforcement Corrosion for Concrete Bridge Decks in Illinois. Illinois Center for Transportation, April 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.36501/0197-9191/22-005.
Full textMartin, Matthew, Jo Walker, Kwesi W. Obeng, and Christian Hallum. The West Africa Inequality Crisis: Fighting austerity and the pandemic. Development Finance International, Oxfam, October 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.21201/2021.8045.
Full textShapira, Roni, Judith Grizzle, Nachman Paster, Mark Pines, and Chamindrani Mendis-Handagama. Novel Approach to Mycotoxin Detoxification in Farm Animals Using Probiotics Added to Feed Stuffs. United States Department of Agriculture, May 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.32747/2010.7592115.bard.
Full textZhou, Ting, Roni Shapira, Peter Pauls, Nachman Paster, and Mark Pines. Biological Detoxification of the Mycotoxin Deoxynivalenol (DON) to Improve Safety of Animal Feed and Food. United States Department of Agriculture, July 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.32747/2010.7613885.bard.
Full textAfrican Open Science Platform Part 1: Landscape Study. Academy of Science of South Africa (ASSAf), 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/assaf.2019/0047.
Full text